Are we alone?

Are we alone? Might Earth be the sole exception to an otherwise dead universe? We shouldn’t be. The ingredients for life are everywhere — life should be common. But then, where is everyone?

This article explains the three possible answers to this question. By the time you finish reading, you will have a firm grasp of the relevant science, enough to form an opinion on which answer is probably right.

Requirements of Life

To arise, life needs three things: Matter, Energy, and Time.

All can be found wherever there are stars. Each star is like a scratch-off lottery ticket — a chance to win by having the right combination. The prize: the universe gains a new planet full of life.

The chance a ticket pays off remains unknown, but science has made progress in estimating the odds.

Given the huge number of tickets, (there are 10^{22} stars in the observable universe), the chances seem good that more than one has paid off.

Let’s review the specific requirements life has for matter, energy and time.


Matter is the stuff life is made of, the building blocks. These are the chemical elements — hydrogen, oxygen, carbon, nitrogen, and so on. These elements exist everywhere. They’re created as byproducts of fusion — the ash of nuclear fires which burn in every star.

The nitrogen in our DNA, the calcium in our teeth, the iron in our blood, the carbon in our apple pies were made in the interiors of collapsing stars. We are made of star stuff.

Carl Sagan

Hydrogen, oxygen, carbon, and nitrogen make up over 99% of the atoms in our bodies. The others are needed only in trace amounts. These same four elements that compose the bulk of our bodies are also the most common chemically-active elements in the solar system.

The same physics and chemistry that operate here apply everywhere in the universe. The familiar elements on Earth are found in every star and galaxy we see. This is more than conjecture. Through analysis of light astronomers can determine the chemical composition of far away stars, nebulae, and galaxies.

Radio telescopes can detect the presence of organic molecules in the center of the Milky Way Galaxy
The ALMA observatory detected complex organic molecules in a gas cloud 27,000 light years away. Image Credit: Y. Beletsky (LCO)/ESO

Complex organic (carbon-containing) molecules, the precursors to life including amino acids, have been detected in distant star-forming gas clouds, or stellar nurseries near the center of the galaxy.

So you are made of the same stuff as stars, planets, comets and gas clouds.

Given the availability of these vital ingredients, the whole universe is filled with the matter needed for life. But life still needs energy and enough time to evolve.


All life feeds on energy. Energy forestalls the natural tendency towards disorder. Any time order is created, such as in growing a body, energy must be expended.

Plants obtain energy from sunlight and store it in chemical bonds. Animals get energy from plants, by eating them and breaking those bonds to release energy, or they eat other animals.

The energy that drives the entire food chain and powers all living things on Earth started in the core of our sun. The same fusion responsible for cooking the chemicals of life provides stars, and life, their energy.

Though all life needs energy, not every life form gets it from sunlight.

Europa, one of Jupiter’s moons, appears on the surface to be a frozen ball of ice. But scientists believe that 10 miles under its frozen surface lies an ocean with twice the liquid water of Earth’s oceans.

What provides the energy to melt this ice? The tides!

Tidal friction creates heat that could melt the ice and provide energy for life. Ultimately this energy comes from the spinning of Jupiter. As Europa’s own tidal forces drag on Jupiter, Jupiter’s rotation slows and its days become longer.

The oldest known lifeforms used geothermal, rather than solar energy. They got their energy from hydrothermal vents like the Lost City — undersea geysers powered by the heat of Earth’s interior.

Life uses energy wherever it finds it.

Fossilized hematite tubes are the oldest evidence of life on earth
Fossilized hematite tubes from the NSB hydrothermal vent deposits are the oldest evidence of life on Earth.
Image Credit: Matthew Dodd, University College London.

In 2017, researchers discovered fossilized hematite tubes that are 4.28 billion years old. This is the oldest evidence for life known. In comparison, Earth is 4.54 billion years old and its oceans, 4.41 billion years.

Once conditions permitted, it didn’t take long for life to start.


The final requirement for life is time — time for life to arise and evolve.

After the formation of Earth, it took a few hundred million years for life to appear. Several billion more were needed to evolve multicellular life. It took a total of 4.3 billion years to get to mammals, and 4.5 billion to yield a tool-making civilization.

To progress through these stages required an environment that remains stable for long periods.

The large stars exhaust their nuclear fuel and explode or collapse after millions of years. This time is too short to host planets with complex life. But in their demise they give hope to others. The elements baked in their cores is what enables life in other star systems.

This explains why life could not appear much earlier in the universe’s history: several generations of large stars had to form, live, die, and explode to spread their ash–the stuff of life–into interstellar space.

Smaller stars are needed to tend to a life-bearing planet. They offer sufficient time for life to do its thing. The lifespan of a star depends on its mass. The smaller its size the longer it lives. Medium-sized stars like our sun last for billions of years. Smaller stars, like red dwarfs, can live for trillions.

Time is one thing the universe is not in short supply of. But life also needs stability.

For a planet to nurture life, it must provide stability. It needs a stable orbit and a host star with a consistent brightness. The planet must also avoid potentially life-ending calamities — asteroid impacts, super volcanoes, and gamma-ray bursts.

Earth has had her own share of catastrophes. The Moon is thought to have formed when Earth collided with a Mars-sized planet called Theia. It’s also believed that at one time the entire surface of Earth was covered in ice.

Despite these, and many asteroid impacts and super volcanoes, once it got started life has held on.

Life’s Tenacity

Life has been found as deep as 19 kilometers underground, 77 kilometers up in the atmosphere, in lakes under the ice of Antarctica and in the scalding 80°C pools of Yellowstone. Where life can exist it will.

Rapidity of Life

Life took hold nearly as soon as conditions permitted.

Of Earth’s 4.54 billion year history, 94% of that time it’s been home to life.

If life arose relatively quickly on Earth, then it could be common in the universe.

Stephen Blair Hedges

Despite many attempts by nature to kill it off, life hasn’t let go since it took hold. Life is hardy.


As an indication of the extreme conditions life might tolerate on other planets, biologists on Earth have taken particular interest in extremophiles — creatures that can survive under extreme conditions.

The Bacillus bacteria has been found to survive temperatures of 420°C (788 °F), and have been revived from a dormant state after 10,000 years. One report even claims to have revived it after being locked in a piece of amber for 25 million years.

Perhaps the most resilient species on Earth is the Tardigrade, also known as water bears. They’re about 1 mm long and look like tiny 8-legged hippos. They can be found almost anywhere.

Water bears are nearly indestructible
A water bear, also known as a tardigrade, can survive almost anywhere. Image Credit: EYE OF SCIENCE / GETTY IMAGES

Water bears live mainly in fresh water and moss, but have been found on the tops of mountains, at the bottom of the sea, in hot springs and rainforests and even in the icy antarctic.

They can survive ionizing radiation, dehydration, starvation, being chilled to near absolute zero and heated to over 150°C. Tardigrades can tolerate exposure to the vacuum of space as well as pressures 600 times that of Earth’s atmosphere. They can put themselves in suspended animation and reanimate a century later.

The European Space Agency sent water bears to space to be exposed to solar radiation, cosmic rays and the vacuum — two thirds survived. Some of the females even laid healthy eggs while in space.

If creatures can be so tough as to survive in space without suits, could they hitch rides to other worlds?


A theory called panspermia proposes that it’s not just the elements of life that are spread throughout space, but the seeds of life itself — primitive organisms that can survive trips through space and colonize suitable worlds they land on.

It sounds outlandish, but there are indications it’s possible. Though no mission to Mars has ever returned with a sample of Martian rocks, you can see a rock from Mars at the London Natural History Museum.

In fact, to date over 266 Martian rocks have been found on Earth. How did they get here?

These rocks were blasted into space by impact events on the surface of Mars. Once in space they floated for unknown amounts of time before getting caught in Earth’s gravity, and falling to the surface.

Mars had oceans before Earth. Some scientists believe life began on Mars.

An ancient Mars once held oceans and the promise of life.
Mars may have had oceans while Earth was still recovering from its collision with Theia. Image Credit: NASA/GSFC

If life began on Mars, it is possible that it hitched a ride to Earth on a Martian meteorite.

In 1996, NASA scientists found evidence of fossilized microbes in a Martian meteorite. The meteorite was discovered in the Allan Hills of Antarctica in 1984, giving it the designation: Allan Hills 84001.

Today, rock 84001 speaks to us across all those billions of years and millions of miles. It speaks of the possibility of life. If this discovery is confirmed, it will surely be one of the most stunning insights into our universe that science has ever uncovered. Its implications are as far-reaching and awe-inspiring as can be imagined. Even as it promises answers to some of our oldest questions, it poses still others even more fundamental.

President Bill Clinton

But the evidence was speculative: it was based on nothing more than microscopic bacteria-like shapes found in the rock. The scientific community did not accept this as definitive evidence of life on Mars.

But in 2019, Hungarian scientists studying another meteorite of the same region, Allan Hills 77005, had a significant finding. It turned out these bacteria-like shapes not only had similar forms and size to bacteria, but chemical analysis revealed mineralized organic compounds–chemicals we would expect to find if these shapes are indeed the fossilized remains of once living cells.

If the first life did arrive here on a meteorite, we’re not Earthlings but Martians.

Though life may have started on Mars, complex life could not arise there. Mars’s feeble gravity couldn’t hold on to her ocean or thick atmosphere. As they leaked into space, Mars became progressively colder and drier. This fact demonstrates the equally important requirement of time.

Earth’s oceans are destined to suffer a similar fate. But not for another 1.1 billion years.

In April 2019, the Beresheet lunar lander — a privately funded project — accidentally crashed on the moon. Among its cargo was a sample of water bears, who are believed to have survived.

We believe the chances of survival for the tardigrades… are extremely high.

Nova Spivack

So there is life on other worlds. It came from Earth and it’s now on the Moon–panspermia in action.

The Fermi Paradox

Enrico Fermi is the architect of the nuclear age. He built the first nuclear reactor by arranging tons of Uranium and graphite in a massive pile in downtown Chicago. The reactor was built in secret in an abandoned racket court under Stagg Field at the University of Chicago.

The undertaking was top secret–part of the Manhattan Project. Despite the dangers of building a reactor in a densely populated area, project leaders trusted Fermi’s calculations.

In the summer of 1950, Fermi made a visit to the Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory. At the time, Edward Teller and others were working on the fusion bomb–a bomb that would release the energy of the stars on Earth.

During a casual lunch with fellow nuclear scientists Edward Teller, Herbert York and Emil Konopinski, Fermi blurted “But where is everybody?

The result of his question was general laughter because of the strange fact that in spite of Fermi’s question coming from the clear blue, everybody around the table seemed to understand at once that he was talking about extraterrestrial life.

Edward Teller

In the ensuing conversation, Fermi did some rough calculations. He estimated the number of stars, the fraction of stars with planets, the fraction of those planets the right distance from their star, and so on, to arrive at a rough approximation of the number of planets with life.

The number he arrived at was so great, Fermi concluded we should have been visited many times over.

Here was a contradiction. On one hand, the calculations say we should have been visited. On the other hand, the lack of evidence suggests we haven’t.

This contradiction is the Fermi Paradox.

The Drake Equation

In 1961, the astrophysicist Frank Drake formalized Fermi’s estimations in The Drake Equation.

It is a simple formula. It simply multiplies together seven values to provide a final estimate for: N — the number of presently detectable alien civilizations in our galaxy.

N = R_{*} \cdot f_{p} \cdot n_{e} \cdot f_{l} \cdot f_{i} \cdot f_{c} \cdot L

Each of the seven numbers is a parameter whose estimate can be refined over time as new data comes in.

The parameters span distinct areas of human knowledge, including astrophysics, biology, evolution, anthropology, and technology. As our knowledge concerning these parameters improves, so too does our estimate for N.

Below is a Drake Equation calculator. You can change the inputs and see what kinds of estimates you obtain for the number of intelligent civilizations that are out there and presently detectable.

R (1.5 – 3) annual rate of star formation in our galaxy
fp (0.2 – 1) fraction of stars with planets
ne (0.1 – 5) environments suitable for life per star with planets
fl (~1) of suitable environments, the fraction that develop life
fi (0.01 – 1) the fraction of life that develops intelligence
fc (0.1 – 0.2) the fraction of intelligent life that emits detectable signals
L (>100) the number of years intelligent life remains detectable
Detectable Civilizations:

One pattern you may notice from playing with the equation is how difficult it is to get the number of predicted civilizations in the universe down to one. It requires what seem to be insanely conservative estimates for the parameters. This is a reflection of the sheer quantity of stars in the observable universe.

There are some hundred billion stars in our galaxy, and there are about a hundred billion visible galaxies. This amounts to 10^{22} stars. Could Earth be the only civilization in the observable universe?

This requires the probability of a star system producing intelligent life to be extremely low — on the order of one out of 10^{22}. That’s one in 10 billion trillion or: 1 followed by 22 zeros. To appreciate the magnitude of this number it helps to see it written out: \text{1 in 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000}.

Even if life is very rare, so long as it is not incredibly rare, the universe ought to be teeming with it.

One in 10 billion trillion is incredibly small. To me, this implies that other intelligent, technology producing species very likely have evolved before us. Think of it this way. Before our result you’d be considered a pessimist if you imagined the probability of evolving a civilization on a habitable planet were, say, one in a trillion. But even that guess, one chance in a trillion, implies that what has happened here on Earth with humanity has in fact happened about 10 billion other times over cosmic history!

Frank Drake

To imagine just how many stars there are, try to imagine all the grains of sand on a beach. One handful of sand contains about 10,000 grains. More than the few thousand stars you might see in a perfectly dark sky.

Yet the total number of stars in the observable universe exceeds all the grains of sand on all of Earth’s beaches. You would need 10,000 Earths to have as many sand grains as there are stars.

How likely is it that of all these grains, only one is blessed with life?

Our Search for ET

Today there are four tracks in our search for extraterrestrial life:

  • Listening for intelligent signals
  • Looking for habitable planets
  • Searching for alien artifacts
  • Sending our friendly greetings

Listening for Signals

The Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) began in earnest in 1984. Frank Drake was one of the SETI Institute’s first leaders. The mission of SETI is to understand the origin of life and the evolution of intelligence.

The Arecibo Radio Telescope in Puerto Rico is one of the most sensitive and powerful antennae on Earth.
The Arecibo Radio Telescope in Puerto Rico is one of the most sensitive and powerful antennae on Earth.

SETI employs a network of radio telescopes to comb the sky for transmissions by technological civilizations.

To date, SETI has scanned only a minuscule fraction of the sky. So far, there have been no confirmed detections of alien signals. However, one detected signal defies all explanation.

In 1977, Dr. Jerry Ehman was a volunteer at SETI. One day, he looked over data collected from the Big Ear radio telescope a few days prior. The telescope was listening in the direction of the Sagittarius constellation.

It was then that Ehman noticed something that astonished him and his colleagues.

I came across the strangest signal I had ever seen, and immediately scribbled ‘Wow!‘ next to it. At first, I thought it was an earth signal reflected from space debris, but after I studied it further, I found that couldn’t be the case.

Jerry Ehman

The event is known as the Wow! signal.

Nothing like it has ever been observed since. The Wow! signal is surprising on many levels:

  • No known astronomical phenomenon produces a signal like what was seen
  • The signal was strong and clear, many times stronger than the background noise
  • The signal was at 1420 MHz, the exact frequency astronomers expect ET to use, and in a frequency range where international law prohibits transmissions (1400 – 1427 MHz is restricted)
  • The signal’s Doppler shift indicated it came from a fixed point in the sky not moving with the Earth or solar system. This rules out any spacecraft, aircraft or terrestrial origin.
  • NASA confirmed there were no space probes in the direction of the sky at the time
  • The direction of the signal was 90 degrees off from any planet including Pluto
  • Despite hundreds of attempts to detect the signal again, it was never seen since

The Big Ear Telescope points in a fixed direction and only sweeps across the sky as the Earth spins. Accordingly, the Big Ear Telescope was only able to hear the Wow! signal for 72 seconds. These 72 seconds represent the only concrete evidence we have of extraterrestrial intelligence, and it’s far from conclusive.

But we don’t have to wait for alien life to make the first move. We can go out and look for it.

Looking for Planets

When the moon crosses between the Earth and Sun, the result is a solar eclipse. During such an eclipse, the sky darkens as the Moon’s shadow crosses over the Earth.

But the moon is not the only body that can create an eclipse. Eclipses that don’t fully block out the sun are known as transits. This is when we see an astronomical body, such as Mercury or Venus, cross the disc of the sun.

Venus transiting the sun in 2012.
Venus transiting the sun in 2012. The next transit of Venus will not recur until 2117. Image Credit NASA/SDO
Transits by Mercury occur much more frequently. The most recent was in 2019.

Whenever a body crosses between Earth and the sun, the result is an apparent dimming. Less light makes it to Earth as a result of it being blocked by that body, be it the Moon, Venus or Mercury.

Astronomers realized this dimming effect could reveal planets in far away star systems.

Finding Habitable Planets

The Kepler Space Telescope remained in service from 2009 to 2018. In that time, it monitored over half a million stars for periodic dimming–evidence of transiting planets. Based on the amount of dimming and how long it lasts, astronomers can determine both the size of the planet and the speed of its orbit.

Using the laws of planetary motion formulated by Johannes Kepler, the speed a planet orbits its star depends on its distance from that star. Thus, the patterns of dimming of a star give scientists enough data to know if there is a planet in the habitable zone of that star.

The habitable zone, also called the Goldilocks zone, is a distance from a star that’s not too hot, nor too cold, but just right. For instance, Earth sits sandwiched between blistering Venus and freezing Mars.

The Kepler Space Telescope was a great success. Kepler discovered 2,662 planets beyond the solar system. Moreover, its data gives us better estimates for two parameters of the Drake Equation.

The fraction of stars with planets f_{p} appears to be very close to 1.

Kepler was also able to provide estimates for the number of environments n_{e} suitable for life in each star system. Kepler’s data indicates at least 20% of star systems have a planet in the habitable zone.

Artist’s conception of a habitable-zone planets identified by the Kepler satellite.
Artist’s conception of habitable-zone planets identified by the Kepler satellite. Image Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech

One habitable zone planet, K2-18b, is especially interesting. The planet was noticed by Kepler and found to be orbiting a star about 100 light years away–close enough for Hubble to analyze the planet’s atmosphere.

In 2019, researchers determined the atmosphere contains water vapor — the first discovery of water on a planet beyond the solar system. The concentrations may even be high enough for the planet to have clouds.

Given the success of Kepler, NASA moved to immediately replace it once the satellite ran out of fuel.

In 2018, NASA launched a new and improved version of Kepler, called the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS). TESS is able to monitor 400 times more sky than Kepler, and its greater sensitivity will allow it to detect even smaller planets on stars that are much closer to Earth.

But a planet being in the right place isn’t an indication it has life. A new experiment aims to correct that.

Searching for Signs of Life

Just as astronomers detected organic molecules in remote regions of the galaxy, new experiments plan to analyze the atmospheres of exoplanets to look for biogenic gases. These are gases created by biological processes and if observed would be telltale signatures for the presence of life.

Mirror Assembly of the James Webb Space Telescope
NASA Scientists looking at the Mirror Assembly for the James Webb Space Telescope. Image Credit: NASA/Chris Gunn

No apparatus has yet been built with the required sensitivity to analyze atmospheres of planets beyond the solar system. But there is one device that will: the James Webb Telescope, the successor to Hubble.

The James Webb Telescope may provide definitive proof for life beyond the solar system. But we won’t know for some time. The Telescope is scheduled for launch in March 2021.

Searching for Artifacts

If aliens have visited our solar system in the past, they may have left behind signs of their presence.

When humans went to the moon, we left footprints, a flag, a plaque, even bags of feces. Absent interference, these signs might survive for eons. If humanity is not careful, they may even outlast us.

If alien races perform engineering feats on planetary or stellar scales, if they leave behind probes, signaling stations, or other artifacts, it is possible we may one day discover one.

Von Neumann Probes

In the 1940s, the polymath John von Neumann invented a machine that could reproduce itself. Crossing the idea of a self-reproducing machine with a space probe resulted in the idea of von Neumann probes–space probes that could stop in a star system to reproduce and then disperse outward in all directions to each of the next closest star systems. Such probes would only need a few million years to reach every star in the galaxy.

An artifact of unknown origin is discovered buried on the Moon in "2001: A Space Odyssey"
An artifact of unknown origin is discovered buried on the Moon in “2001: A Space Odyssey”

This idea served as the basis of Arthur C. Clarke’s short story The Sentinel, which itself was the basis of Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey. In the story, humans discover that aliens passing through our star system eons ago left something behind — a token of their presence in the form of a beacon on the moon.

As we turn our eyes toward the heavens, we may notice other, less subtle, clues of alien intelligence.


Intelligence and technology gave us the power to alter our environment.

Some of our changes are visible from space. For instance, city lights cause parts of the Earth to glow at night.

Our cities glow on the dark side of the Earth.
Our cities glow on the dark side of the Earth. Image Credit: NASA Earth Observatory, Robert Simmon

As our technology increases, so does our our ability to change our environment. According to the Kardashev scale, present humans rank below a Type I civilization. Type I civilizations make use of all the energy resources available to a planet.

The next stage according to this scale, is a Type II civilization — a civilization that makes use of all the energy output by their home star. This requires technology to build stellar engines.

Stellar engines have been envisioned as large Dyson spheres or swarms of solar cells that orbit the star to capture large fractions of its energy output.

Stellar engines would change the spectrum of the star in a very noticeable way, but none have been detected so far, though Tabby’s star has caught the imaginations of many.

The strange behavior of Tabby’s star was detected by the Kepler Space Telescope and reported by Tabetha Boyajian who noticed irregular fluctuations in the star’s brightness. The behavior remains unexplained.

Sending our Greetings

Perhaps aliens are shy. They might be waiting for us to make the first move, to signal our willingness to talk.

Since the 1970s, humans have made several overtures to invite interstellar conversation.


In 1974, renovations on the giant Arecibo Radio Telescope in Puerto Rico were completed. To mark the occasion, the powerful dish was used to broadcast a message to the stars, it is known as the Arecibo message.

The Arecibo Message is man's first attempt at making contact with an alien race.
The Arecibo Message is man’s first attempt at making contact with an alien race.

The message was written by Frank Drake with help from Carl Sagan and others. It is meant to be easily deciphered by anyone who might intercept it. It was encoded in binary, as a series of 1,679 black and white pixels. When arranged in a grid of 73 rows by 23 columns it forms a simple pictorial diagram.

The message encodes a numbering scheme, the atomic numbers of the elements that compose our DNA, a picture of a person, and the radio antenna that broadcast the message.

A telescope of an equivalent size and sensitivity to the Arecibo Telescope on the receiving end could pick up the signal from a distance of tens of thousands of light years–on the other side of the galaxy.

Decades passed before any other deliberate attempt was made to speak to aliens. In 2012, the Arecibo Telescope was once again used to send a message.

This time it sent a reply to the part of the sky from which the Wow! signal was detected 35 years earlier. The message consisted of 10,000 Twitter messages solicited by the National Geographic Channel.

Who would have guessed that Twitter could be used to communicate with ET?

Greeting Cards

In 1977, the four outer planets Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune were aligned in a way that would not repeat until 2153. It provided the perfect opportunity to leave the solar system.

NASA took advantage of the opportunity and launched two robots, the Voyager 1 and Voyager 2 space probes. On their way out, they were boosted by stealing a tiny bit of energy from each of the four gas giants, using a technique known as a gravitational slingshot.

The gravitational slingshot: trajectories of Voyager 1 and 2. Credit The JLR Group.

The speed is gained by falling in towards the planet, riding behind it as it orbits the sun. The effect slows the orbit of the planet ever so slightly. The years for each of these four planets are now a bit longer. But in slowing down Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune, the speed of the Voyager probes was greatly boosted.

It provided them with enough speed to break free of the sun’s gravity. Both probes are now free to roam the galaxy. It took over 4 decades, but as of 2018 both probes have left the solar system.

Despite being over 20 billion kilometers away, we remain in contact with them via their 23 watt radio transmitters–surprising given that’s only a few times stronger than a cell phone’s 3 watt transmitter.

Each of the probes contains a greeting card, in the form of a Golden Record.

"The Sounds of Earth" are recorded on Golden Records on board each of the Voyager Probes.
“The Sounds of Earth” are recorded on Golden Records on board each of the Voyager Probes.

The records contain a selection of greetings in various languages, music, and sounds from nature.

This is a present from a small, distant world, a token of our sounds, our science, our images, our music, our thoughts and our feelings. We are attempting to survive our time so we may live into yours.

President Jimmy Carter

The records are made of copper and plated in gold. They’re designed to last for billions of years. If the sun is to one day envelop the Earth, these probes may constitute the only evidence humanity was ever here.

Solutions to Fermi’s Paradox

Two possibilities exist: either we are alone in the Universe or we are not. Both are equally terrifying.

Arthur C. Clarke

Thanks to Kepler, we can estimate there are 40 billion rocky planets in our galaxy with the right orbits to have liquid water. Despite this, science has yet to find solid evidence of alien life.

Our galaxy is not filled with stellar engines, radio beacons, or self-replicating probes. Nor have little green men landed at the UN to establish an embassy. Our lack of evidence is not from lack of trying. How then do we square the idea that alien life should be common with the plain fact that we have yet to find any proof?

There are many proposed answers to Fermi’s Paradox. But all fall loosely into one of three categories:

  1. We are alone: Life, or intelligent life, is rare. It’s either hard to evolve, or too fragile to maintain.
  2. They isolate: Aliens choose not to spread through the galaxy making noticeable changes to it.
  3. They are here: Aliens are here but they conceal their presence from us.

Each of these possibilities is consistent with existing observations. To get an idea for which type of answer is most likely correct, we must review the proposed solutions in more detail.

We are Alone

Physically speaking, anything that can happen in one time or place can happen in another. All of science is based on this notion of reproducibility: given the same starting conditions, the same outcomes result.

If the universe is infinite, which by all indications it seems to be, then the possibility of life combined with an infinite extent of space statistically guarantees other life, including intelligent life, exists out there.

But this doesn’t tell us how near or far that life is. If intelligent life is so rare that it occurs on less than one star in 10^{22}, then we might be the only example in the observable universe.

The vast distances implied by being the only intelligence in the observable universe would, for all practical purposes, mean we are alone, even if infinite other intelligences exist across our infinite universe.

Life is Rare

The most obvious answer to Fermi’s paradox is simply that he got his math wrong. He may have overlooked some Great Filter–something difficult to have, obtain, or pass, but necessary for life.

For example, it might be important, but also rare, to have a large moon and a large planet like Jupiter nearby. Both help clear away and deflect debris in the inner solar system. This debris might otherwise plague Earth with perpetual planetary bombardment from asteroids, comets, and meteors.

Comet Shoemaker–Levy 9 impacts Jupiter's southern hemisphere at 60 kilometers a second.
On July 16, 1994, Jupiter took one for the team. It absorbed the full brunt of the Comet Shoemaker–Levy 9, which impacted Jupiter’s southern hemisphere at 60 kilometers a second.

This idea is known as the Rare Earth Hypothesis. It is a proposed solution to the Fermi Paradox.

Other proposed rare coincidences relate to the fact that Earth has a fairly active interior. This interior both creates a protective magnetic shield and also makes for geothermal vents. These vents may have played a key role in kick-starting life.

The hypothesized collision with Theia would be a relatively uncommon event. But it gave Earth her large moon. The moon creates tides, which create tide pools. Tide pools also might have played a role in the appearance of life–they provided a place for the chemical stuff of life to mix together and concentrate.

The theory remains hotly debated. The counterevidence for life being difficult is the speed at which it arose on Earth. It appeared relatively quickly, within a fraction of a billion years after Earth’s oceans formed.

The other argument is statistical. For Earth to be the only planet with life, life would have to be incredibly rare.

It is conceivable that with a billion year head-start, an intelligent civilization 100 million light years away could spread to us using von Neumann probes. For Earth to be the only planet with life for a 100 million light years, life would have to occur on less than one out of every 200 trillion star systems.

More data will be required to settle the question of the Rare Earth Hypothesis. It may come within a few years, when results of surveys for biogenic gasses are completed by the James Webb Telescope.

It could also be disproved if conclusive evidence is found indicating primitive life on Mars, as suggested by chemical analysis of the bacteria-like shapes on the Allan Hills 77005 Martian meteorite.

Intelligence is Rare

According to this solution to the Paradox, life may be common, but evolving complex intelligent life is not. This would explain why we haven’t heard radio signals or found alien megastructures.

Intelligence is a key factor in the success and survival of the human species. But for most of the millions of other species on this planet, it is not. Might we be biased in assuming evolution favors intelligence?

Moreover, perhaps there are barriers to evolving through the various required stages. It may be that evolving multicellular life is difficult–after all it took several billion years to get from single-celled organisms to animals.

While evolving intelligence is not inevitable, there are reasons to believe intelligence is favored. The evidence for this is convergent evolution–independent branches of the evolutionary tree separately evolved intelligence.

Outside of our own primate lineage there are: dolphins and elephants among mammals, grey parrots and crows among the birds, and even the mollusks have octopuses and cuttlefish.

A crow bends a wire into a hook to get at a piece of food.

Greater intelligence provides advantages to those species who evolve it. It enables predators to out-think their prey, and social creatures to out-think each other.

Given that intelligence has arisen multiple times from different lines of evolution, it is reasonable to suspect that it will arise so long as life can bridge the gap from single-celled life to multicellular life.

We are the First

Perhaps neither life, nor intelligence is inherently rare–we just happen to be the first.

This theory is in line with the understanding that life should be common, and intelligence should be favored by evolution. It also explains the complete lack of observational evidence for other alien civilizations.

However, the view that we’re first runs counter to two facets of our cosmological understanding.

The first is that life could have arisen billions of years earlier than it did on Earth. Rocky planets formed in the first billion years after the Big Bang, and carbon was abundant after 1.5 billion years. We know carbon and other necessary elements were available then by looking at old far-away galaxies.

It’s estimated that the first intelligent civilizations existed as early as 5 billion years ago. Given the rate of formation and destruction of star systems, the average extraterrestrial civilization has a 1.7 billion year head start on us. In the words of Carl Sagan, “We’re Johnny-come-latelies.”

The second cosmological idea this runs counter to is the Copernican principle. The Copernican principle says we should not expect to hold any privileged position in the universe. Statistically, its far more likely that we occupy some average or middle position, than hold a special spot like being first.

If billions of civilizations are expected to live in this universe, the odds that we’re the first would correspondingly be one in billions.

Intelligence Destroys Itself

In a twist of fate, perhaps Fermi’s own work provides the very answer to his question. Fermi ushered in the nuclear age, paving the way to technologies that could bring about our destruction.

Fermi's work unleashed the power of the atom on Earth.
Fermi’s work unleashed the power of the atom on Earth.

What’s scarier is that nuclear weapons are just the first of many technologies that carry such a burden.

We now contend with the risks from biological weapons, AI, nanotechnology, and environmental destruction. Some even fear that modern physics experiments like particle accelerators pose an existential risk–though this particular threat is low given that higher energy collisions occur naturally.

As doomsday technology becomes more broadly available, an ever-increasing number of hands will hover over big red buttons. It is an unstable situation. Even if there’s just a 1% chance per year that one of these technologies wipes us out, that means humanity has less than a 5% chance of surviving the next 300 years.

If we’re not careful, we could spell our own doom. But even if many or most intelligent species wipe themselves out, it seems unlikely that all of them do. Some should survive to inherit the stars.

A single message from space will show that it is possible to live through technological adolescence.

Carl Sagan

Humanity has so far managed to survive perils of our making. It’s incumbent on us to keep it that way.

They Isolate

If intelligence exists throughout the universe, we haven’t noticed.

But rather than assume this is because nothing is out there, it could also be that we’re not looking in the right places or for the right things. We expect aliens to conquer the universe, transforming it in their wake, but perhaps they choose to keep to themselves where they might explore the limitless depths of inner space.

They are Quiet

The search for SETI assumed radio transmission will be how alien species communicate. We expect alien civilizations to be noisy in the radio spectrum–filling the airwaves with their music and television.

But SETI is a reflection of our 1970s technology–a time when TV and radio broadcasts were the primary means of distributing information. Since then, we’ve largely shifted away from broadcast TV to closed-circuit and point-to-point systems: cable TV, fiber optics, satellite dishes, and Internet streaming services.

In less than a generation we've transformed our communications technologies.
In less than a generation we’ve transformed our communications technologies.

These technologies offer more channels and data transmission. They’re also quiet. An alien civilization would be unable to intercept what you watch over Netflix.

Though we still use radio, technologies are moving away from central broadcasts towards localized low-power systems, like cellular networks. Spread spectrum technologies increase the reliability and bandwidth of our transmissions, but also make them harder for outsiders to differentiate from background noise.

Even if civilizations last for millions or billions of years, the window during which they transmit openly into space with high-power radios might last only a few decades. Lasers enable more efficient and higher throughput communication, but only recently has anyone started to look for alien laser transmissions.

What about the lack of alien megastructures, like Dyson swarms?

It turns out even the technology of our science fiction is far behind the possible technology of alien civilizations.

Building a Dyson swarm around a star requires vast amounts of matter and energy. Entire planets would need to be disassembled to provide the raw materials. In the end, the Dyson swarm would capture only 0.7% of the energy present in the mass-energy of the star and it would take the entire lifetime of the star to capture.

An advanced civilization could much more easily construct a black hole engine. Such an engine can turn 100% of mass into energy–142 times the efficiency of fusion. Moreover, anything you feed it is fuel. Just drop something into it and the black hole turns it into pure energy in the form of Hawking radiation.

A mountain-sized black hole would give off X-rays and gamma rays, at a rate of about 10 million megawatts, enough to power the world’s electricity supply.

Stephen Hawking

A civilization using micro black holes to meet its energy needs would be very difficult to detect.

Black hole engines were inconceivable before 1974 when Hawking proved black holes radiate. The technologies available to civilizations millions of years ahead of us may be less fathomable than a black hole engine would be to an ancient Babylonian–we still don’t even have a good understanding of gravity.

Space is Too Big

Space is big. So big that many believe interstellar travel is so resource and time intensive that no intelligent civilization would seriously bother with it. This would account for why we haven’t been visited.

Take, for example, the fastest thing humans have ever launched: the Voyager space probes. Voyager 1 is traveling at 61,200 kilometers per hour (17 kilometers per second). Despite this speed, it will take Voyager 40,000 years to even approach a nearby star.

These speeds were obtained with chemical rockets–fundamentally the same technology as rockets used by the Chinese 800 years ago. Both burn chemicals in a confined space to blow hot gas out a nozzle.

We know it’s possible to do much better. In the late 1950s, the top secret Project Orion aimed to build a nuclear pulse rocket that could reach the stars in a human lifetime. This design uses a series of controlled nuclear detonations behind the vehicle to propel it forward.

Pulsed explosion propulsion was successfully demonstrated as part of Project Orion.

In 1968, Freeman Dyson calculated that a nuclear pulse design like Orion could achieve 10% the speed of light (17,634 times faster than Voyager). At this speed we could reach the nearest star in 43 years.

But Orion would cost hundreds of billions of dollars–ten times more than the Apollo program. Moreover, the 1963 Partial Test Ban Treaty prohibited nuclear detonations in space. Project Orion was canceled in 1964.

Since then, we’ve found better ways of reaching the stars. One of those ideas is the StarChip.

The miniaturization of computers allows fully functional spacecraft, complete with cameras, sensors, controllers, and antennae to be built on a computer chip. The entire craft could weigh less than a gram.

Owing to its size, it could reach 20% the speed of light, accelerated by a collection of ground-based lasers.

Like the first explorers who sailed Earth’s oceans, we can sail to the stars on a beam of light.

Plans for the StarChip were made in 2016. If they follow through, we could reach the nearest stars by 2050. Once built, the system can launch thousands of the StarChips. It would take the lasers only about 20 minutes to accelerate each StarChip to 20% of the speed of light (60,000 kilometers / second).

At 10% the speed of light, self-replicating von Neumann probes could cover the galaxy in a million years.

These time scales are large in human time frames, but they are small on evolutionary scales. If Earth is an indication, it takes about 5 billion years to evolve a technological species, but only 1 million years (0.02% of that time) for that species to fill the galaxy with its technology.

On evolutionary time scales, the galaxy is accessible. Earth itself has lapped the Milky Way 18 times in her history. Given ample time, the bigness of space is no barrier to a technological species that wants to fill the galaxy. With a 1.7 billion year head start, technological civilizations have had plenty enough time.

If space is not too big, the mystery remains. Why don’t we see clear evidence of anyone’s presence?

Assuming intelligent species arise and last, then only two explanations are left. They either universally decide not to spread outward, or they do spread outward but remain hidden.

They Leave our Universe

At some point aliens might discover technology that allows them to leave the universe, to transcend their physical existence, or perhaps even to create and explore realities of their own choosing.

Traveling from star system to star system would become repetitive, tedious, and, given the time scales, would be immensely boring. Having the technology to explore infinite possibilities from their own home, advanced civilizations might quickly lose interest in exploring outer space.

This solution to the Fermi Paradox is known as the Transcension Hypothesis.

But is leaving the physical universe possible?

Leaving the universe is possible in a figurative sense. When someone is deeply engrossed in their device, or a computer game, they are in a sense in their own reality.

Future virtual reality technology will make this truer still. Given the exponential progress of computing technology, (getting ever smaller, denser, and faster), it may soon be possible to live in virtual reality.

The best physically possible computers, those of the greatest speed and storage capacity, look little different from a black hole. To perform a computation, matter would be dropped in to the hole in a specific pattern, and the hole would perform the desired computation and return the result via Hawking radiation.

The transcension hypothesis proposes the final evolutionary stage of life is to live in black holes.
The transcension hypothesis proposes the final evolutionary stage of life is to live in black holes. Image Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech

Black holes are in a sense detached from our universe. If an alien civilization builds black hole computers, and if they put themselves into virtual reality programs run on these computers, then in a very literal sense such a civilization will have physically left our universe–they would no longer be part of our spacetime and would live in a designer reality that’s effectively causally isolated from our universe.

According to the Kardashev Scale, technological civilizations advance by consuming ever more energy: the energy of their planet, their star, and eventually their galaxy. But maybe we got it wrong.

The Barrow Scale proposes that civilizations should be ranked according to their mastery over the smallest scales.

  • BI – manipulates objects on its own scale (1 meter)
  • BII – manipulates genes (10^{-7} meters)
  • BIII – manipulates molecules (10^{-9} meters)
  • BIV – manipulates atoms (10^{-11} meters)
  • BV – manipulates atomic nuclei (10^{-15} meters)
  • BVI – manipulates subatomic particles (10^{-18} meters)
  • BΩ – manipulates space-time structure (10^{-35} meters)

The smaller we can miniaturize technology, the faster and more efficient our computers become. Instead of exploding outward across the galaxy, civilizations might explode inward towards ever smaller dimensions.

If the transcension hypothesis is correct, inner space, not outer space, is the final frontier for universal intelligence. Our destiny is density.

John Smart

Exploring reality with computers offers many benefits over exploring space with rockets and telescopes:

  • Unrestricted access: Simulation lets them explore realms they can’t get to physically. Such as past and future epochs, regions beyond the cosmological horizon, even other universes having different laws.
  • Provides faster answers: With a fast enough computer, they could simulate the entire billion-year evolutionary history of a planet in hours, rather than wait billions of years to watch it unfold.
  • More efficient: Vast amounts of energy are needed to accelerate even a small object to a fraction of the speed of light. That energy could be much better spent on CPU cycles.
  • Inner space exploration: The inner-space of consciousness is just as infinite and rich as outer space–if not more so. Virtual reality can provide any possible experience, the only limit being imagination. Exploration of inner space might even be the meaning of life.

The transcension hypothesis’s answer to why we don’t see evidence of technological civilizations is not that they don’t exist or that they universally destroy themselves, but that they have miniaturized themselves.

Accordingly, they remain undetectable to our current technology.

They are Here

Perhaps life and intelligence are common and they do spread throughout the cosmos.

Even if a technological civilization transcends and miniaturizes, there are still reasons it might spread. Chief among them is that it provides redundancy. Should a gamma ray burst or other astronomical calamity befall them, being spread out ensures their continued survival.

A technological civilization might also spread to protect itself and others. For example, to guard against the rise of malicious self-replicating probes, which if left unchecked could destroy all life in the galaxy.

Finally, a technological species might choose to protect planets harboring life, so that primitive life might enjoy the same chance to grow and develop as that alien species did before them.

Given the trajectory of increasing miniaturization of our technology, (like our 1-gram spaceship on a chip), we can now envision alien technology that has mastered the nano scale. To us, such alien ships might look like a grain of dust, but it would be a dust imbued with intelligence.

The nano-ships could contain a powerful AI or even the uploaded minds of billions of members of their race.

Given the physical upper-bounds on computer technology, an entire civilization of 100 billion souls could live on a single computer that is smaller than a grain of sand.

With control over matter at the finest scales, such a civilization could easily make many copies of these ships and be present everywhere in the galaxy. Each ship could carry a complete set of every member of that civilization.

Being so small, millions of civilizations could each have their own dust ships present in every star system of the galaxy. We would not be aware of them unless it was their desire to make their presence known.

If this technology is possible, they may already be here: hiding and watching.

Earth is Protected

If they are here, why haven’t they announced themselves? How could the potentially millions of independent civilizations all agree to keep mum?

One possibility is that there is some form of galactic law, like the Prime Directive of Star Trek, which forbids external interference with a developing civilization.

Another possibility is a convergence of ethics–a common wisdom shared by advanced civilizations that leads them to reach similar conclusions regarding what is right and wrong. If there is a disagreement, they could simulate outcomes of different courses of actions on computers to see what is the right thing to do.

The older, more established, and more advanced civilizations could share their knowledge and experience with the younger and perhaps more rash civilizations. Young civilizations are apt to make mistakes, like launching self-replicating probes without the proper safeguards, or interfering with the development of life on a young world by not following decontamination procedures, or making first contact with a civilization that’s not ready.

If anything like this is true, that would make our solar system a kind of nature preserve, or a zoo. Accordingly, this solution to the Fermi Paradox is known as the Zoo Hypothesis.


In this article we have reviewed:

  • Our understanding of the development of life in the universe, and why it should be common
  • Our efforts to find evidence of life and intelligence
  • The current lack of definitive findings.

To estimate how near the closest intelligent life is, we must rely on the Drake Equation.

Even with pessimistic assumptions, such as 1% of habitable zone planets developing life, and just 1% of planets with life developing intelligence, we still expect tens of thousands of technological civilizations having arisen in our galaxy over the past billion years. If just one of those civilizations survived its period of technological adolescence, it could in a very short time spread throughout the galaxy.

But we see no evidence of this. Hence the paradox.

Whenever we encounter a paradox–two things which can’t both be true–it’s almost always a sign that one of our assumptions is wrong. The Fermi Paradox rests on two assumptions:

  1. Technological civilizations should have arisen many times
  2. If there are other technological civilizations we would see them

For the first assumption to be wrong, intelligent life must be unbelievably rare — so rare it verges on the impossible, appearing on 0.00000000000000000001% of star systems. It is possible intelligent life could be so rare, but it is also possible that the second assumption is wrong.

Fermi and others at the time assumed that if intelligent life has arisen before, there would be obvious signs of it. Surely they would build great power plants out of their sun, conquer the galaxy terraforming planets, and travel the galaxy in huge generation ships all while communicating by radio.

We’ve seen the many reasons to doubt this. Aliens, could easily be so alien we fail to notice them.

We can already imagine that by miniaturizing and merging with technology alien civilizations could become so small as to be practically invisible. And this is still from our limited 21st-century human perspective.

We have no concept for how an alien civilization in their 1,000,000th century might look. We know not how they spend their time, nor what values guide them. We don’t even know if civilization is the proper word for what they become. For all we know, intelligent life may merge itself into a singular superconsciousness. Perhaps all intelligent civilizations cooperate as a single nation of intelligent beings.

One thing is clear: our knowledge regarding behaviors of far-advanced species is lacking. We know only that we don’t know enough to settle the Fermi Paradox today–but perhaps we can progress by reframing the question.

What’s more likely:

That each of the 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 other chances intelligence had to arise failed, or that humans once showed a narrow imagination for just how different future civilizations might be?

Related articles:

43 Replies to “Are we alone?”

  1. Our understanding of gravity is wrong.i may not be able to write an article here but let me just share a cinch with you. If i was every experiencing pull or push as i zoom out of planet earth then gravity is more or less of a particle. What makes the world think that space is a vacuum?

    1. Hi Jacob,

      I think many physicists now recognize our understanding of gravity is wrong (or at least incomplete) and hope to discover a workable quantized theory of gravity. String theory is a candidate, but it’s difficulty is that it doesn’t seem to point out any single theory but rather vasts numbers of different possible systems of physics.

      Regarding the vacuum, this is another area where our understanding has changed significantly. Rather than viewing the vacuum as nothingness, quantum field theory views the vacuum as “something” — a series of overlapping fields of various kinds which can interact with one another.

      Some of these ideas are covered in the “Is the universe fine-tuned?” article.

  2. That is an interesting article, yet, I still think and believe that we should rally on the development of the ideas of agnosticology and deistology and even the whole idea about the Extended SETI (E-SETI), we seriously should consider looking for life beyond what we can see and physically/empirically prove, since it is very likely that aliens have already evolved into a post-physical/post-biological society or even that they’ve even developed themselves beyond physics and beyond the spacetime as well, one may say “but it violates the laws of physics” or even “it is unrealistic”, it may be somehow, but we never know if those aliens have actually developed enough technology or discovered enough ways to break out classical “laws of physics” or even break the “spacetime” and evolve into a post-physical/post-biological species, our knowledge about physics and the world is still very limited, and still we cannot exclude the existence of extranatural/supernatural things, as spiritual beings and gods, they exist beyond the spacetime and beyond physics, so yes, physics, as well as natural sciences and empirical sciences, are limited into what is physical, material and natural, and deny the existence of things beyond those is very ignorance or even purely militant atheism (atheist fanaticism), militant scientism (scientific/scientistic fanaticism), militant secularism (secular fanaticism), or militant skepticism (skeptical fanaticism), and we still cannot forget about multiverses and that we should develop means to study multiverses by post-positivist/post-empirical ways as well as search for gods, spiritual beings, and post-physical/post-biological/extraphysical lifeforms by post-positivist/post-empirical ways. I am being agnostic about that and we really should consider develop agnosticology/deistology and the whole idea/plan of E-SETI or even an analogue of E-SETI in real life.

    1. Hi Guilherme Monteiro Jr.,

      I agree that if there are technological civilizations to be found, they have likely transcended (into nano-technological, ultra-powerful computing substrates), or perhaps even as you suggest, broken free or out of our spacetime. Therefore our current SETI efforts are quite unlikely to succeed because we are looking for the wrong signs. Based on what you’ve written so far I think you will very much enjoy my planned article on “Does God Exist?” — it will cover quite a number of these ideas and possibilities.

  3. I simply get really mad and angry with people saying like there aren’t aliens among us and call people who believe there are aliens among us and that they can talk with aliens are “insane people” and such, I’ve talked with so many of them and I can conclude they aren’t that insane, I mean, yeah, maybe UFOs are aliens or not, but we cannot deny that aliens might and probably exist beyond physics and beyond the spacetime, aliens or are highly evolved/advanced civilizations that reached a post-physical level of existence or they simply exist at spiritual level or both of them. It makes me insane to see the massive number of atheist zealots and skeptical zealots who keep mocking those people and making ‘memes’ (propaganda) against them. Aliens indeed exist, and we shouldn’t allow a bunch of atheist zealots, skeptical zealots and scientific zealots (or scientistic zealots) like Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, Bill Nye, Richard Wiseman, Daniel Foschetti Gontijo, Luciano Lobato, Bibi Bailas, Jason Ferrer, Dave Farina, and so many others (as the ones on that crappy website named Quora, and the ones on social media) to affech those people in bad ways, debunkism and the culture of debunking are as bad as cancel culture and most of the so called “debunkings” are very pointless and filled with false statements, and logical fallacies are relative as well and often alleged fallacies are not fallacious at all, besides the concepts/terms of ‘nonsense’ and ‘bullsh1t’ are also relative and subjective as well in the sense they often mean something they person disagree the most or do not believe the most, as well as related concepts/terms like delusion, irrationality, illogic, stupidity and others, and do not forget that rationality and logic are relative and subjective in the sence they depend of the experiences of each person and of the reality of each person, much better of those atheist zealots and scientific zealots who believe their views are objective when they aren’t and such kind of people. And as I told in the other comment, the idea of deistology, agnosticology and E-SETI are valid, and we should use epistemological pluralism for study those things and develop spiritual sciences as well. I will still be a harsh critic of atheism, as well as a harsh critic of science, skepticism, debunkism, and so many other things out there, and no one will stop me, regardless I am having Asperger’s syndrome with some psychotic traits (which is normal for some aspies and people with autism), and being unable to write books and long articles as well.

    1. Hi Guilherme Monteiro Jr.,

      Indeed, the existence of other life and other intelligent life is not the least bit controversial given our current scientific knowledge. Science has gathered strong evidence for both the idea that our universe is spatially infinite (the concordance model), as well as the idea that there are infinite big bangs (eternal inflation), and not to mention the idea that there is a multiverse (quantum mechanics).

      Any of these three ideas taken alone is sufficient to establish beyond doubt other intelligent life exists out there. The only uncertainty is how near or far that next intelligent is from us. Max Tegmark has calculated an upper bound:

      As for writing long articles or books, I find it helpful to break it down into smaller steps. Write an outline first, then write a few paragraphs for each part of the outline. This can give you a chapter or article. Do this for enough chapters and you have a book.

  4. I understand what you mean, anyway, the ideas/notions of agnosticology and deistology, as well as E-SETI, spiritual sciences and post-empirical/post-positivist sciences are very necessary to be developed and embraced, it is very necessary to start with the development of deistology/agnosticology (both are the same thing, the only difference is the philosophy behind them), the analogue of E-SETI (but yet, the development of post-physical telescopes and post-physical radio would be an issue, but it could be possible with massive investments and studies), spiritual sciences (since things related to the spirit and to the consciousness should have their own studying methods), and post-empirical/post-positivist sciences (yes, it is very necessary and needed nowadays, epistemological pluralism is necessary nowadays), and people should stop thinking that scientific evidences prove everything when they don’t prove anything, the only thing scientific evidences prove is how ‘X is related to Y’ and nothing else (same for objective evidences), and most people cannot see it, that is the why we have this wave of scientism and scientific fanaticism nowadays (as well as militant atheism, atheist fanaticism, militant skepticism and skeptical fanaticism). And yes, people who often talking with aliens are not delusional at all and not insane at all, but they might have some form of autism and such kinds of things, but the relationship with their mental illnesses with their contacts is not like a causal relationship, but most like a simple relationship, since it would be just like say that the DNA of humans and the DNA of a Banana is 95% similar and yet we do not have a peel nor we are yellow or have the same texture of a banana. And also, people who talk with aliens are just like people who talks with gods and spiritual beings, I do not deny that most of them are fake or just trying to get famous and get money, but there are genuine ones as I am with the Anunnas (I can talk with Nammu, Anu, Utu, Ishtar, Ki, Nergal, Enki, Enlil, Nanar and some others, but the ones I mentioned are the ones I talk with the most), and I know it is subjective and personal, that is the why I wrote about agnosticology/deistology and about spiritual sciences and epistemological pluralism. And also, aliens and gods, as well as spiritual beings and highly evolved beings, do not show themselves to humans, simply because humans are very primitive, it is just you see popular culture, filled with tribalism, speciesism, xenospeciesism (also species xenophobia), theospeciesism, misotheism, antitheism, demonsism, deicidism, militant speciesism, militant xenospeciesism, militant misotheism, human supremacism, human nationalism, and others, and people still liking it and even worshipping it (pop culture paganism is an example of that), and do not forget capitalism, militant atheism, scientism, scientific fanaticism, scientific fundamentalism, scientific extremism, atheist fanaticism, atheist fundamentalism, atheist extremism, antitheism, skepticism, skeptical fanaticism, skeptical fundamentalism, skeptical extremism, secular humanism, debunkism, neoliberalism, anarcho-capitalism, right-wing libertarianism, objectivism, classical transhumanism, neoconservatism, and so many others, and it has to change for aliens, gods, spiritual beings, angelics, celestials, and highly evolved beings decide to interact with humans in better and direct ways. Humans are so far from become a species of highly evolved beings as aliens and gods are, but still humans can develop means to do that and how to do it, and what I’ve said before are some examples of that.

  5. I do agree with Guilherme Monteiro Jr. when he mentioned about deistology/agnosticology, E-SETI, spiritual sciences and aliens, the development of such areas is a must and very necessary nowadays, mainly the whole idea of post-empirical/post-positivist sciences and spiritual sciences as well, the idea of search for gods, spiritual beings and extraphysical lifeforms as we search for aliens on SETI is something very necessary nowadays, the idea of E-SETI is valid, regardless it was created by an AI in that Bellard website. Anyway, what Monteiro said about gods and spiritual beings, I do agree with him, mainly about talking with them, I am an agnostic, despite I am also very closed to anunnakism, and I also had some experiences with the Anunnas as well, and I indeed agree with Monteiro when he said science is limited and such, science fails to study about those things and things related to spirituality simply because they are outside the domains of natural sciences and hard sciences, that is the why the development of spiritual sciences, post-empirical sciences and epistemological pluralism is something necessary to the condition we are living in nowadays, agnosticology is also a good idea that should be put in practice, as well as conscientiology, spiritology, divinology and such areas, we should call them “pseudoscience”, because besides pseudoscience be a bad category and even a flawed category, it would also mean include soft sciences, social sciences, humanities, philosophy, metaphysics and all else as “pseudosciences”, it is just a very bad category and very flawed category as well. It is just very sad that Monteiro cannot express himself well outside Quozio, but that is fine, one day in a near future Quozio will leak his quotes somewhere else or even someone else will do it, but that is fine anyway.

  6. Criticism of atheism, criticism of antitheism, criticism of irreligion, criticism of skepticism, criticism of rationalism, criticism of materialism, criticism of positivism, criticism of neopositivism, criticism of eliminativism, criticism of scientism, and criticism of science are a must nowadays and people should be encouraged to do those things, me, Guilherme Antonio Monteiro Gomes Junior, is a harsh critic of those things, yet I am alone in that and I do not have enough people for support me on that, but I still do my best on doing that, I do not mind to being cyberstalked or even IP tracked because of those things, it is something I do with pleasure and that I do for my own best and because of my Asperger’s syndrome with psychotic symptoms, I’ve already wrote a ton of Quotes and articles and I do not regret doing so, despite I cannot write long articles, since I am only 21 and I do not know how to argue/debate well, I am very bad at arguing and debating, and I seriously hope someone will help my theories and ideas/notions/concepts and develop them even more, increasing the criticism of atheism, criticism of antitheism, criticism of irreligion, criticism of skepticism, criticism of rationalism, criticism of materialism, criticism of positivism, criticism of neopositivism, criticism of eliminativism, criticism of scientism, and criticism of science, as well as the criticism of the concept of pseudoscience, criticism of the concept of antiscience, criticism of the concept of science denial, criticism of the concept of bullsh1t, criticism of the concept of nonsense, criticism of the concept of ridiculous/ludicrous, criticism of the concepts of based and cringe, criticism of the concept of bad science, criticism of the concept of logical fallacy, criticism of the concept of pseudophilosophy, criticism of the concept of delusion, criticism of the concept of scientific evidence, criticism of the concept of objective evidence, criticism of the concept of mumbojumbo, criticism of the concept of superstition, criticism of the concept of evidence, criticism of the concept of credulity, criticism of the concept of cult, criticism of the concept of irrationality, criticism of the concept of illogic, criticism of misotheism, criticism of theospeciesism, criticism of xenospeciesism, criticism of speciesism, criticism of classical transhumanism, criticism of microchipism (criticism of human microchips), criticism of carlinism, criticism of anti-postmodernism, criticism of psychiatry, criticism of psychology, criticism of neuroscience, criticism of psychoatheism, criticism of neuroatheism, criticism of social media, criticism of the Internet, criticism of smartphones, criticism of debunking, criticism of capitalism, criticism of liberalism, criticism of neoliberalism, criticism of libertarianism, criticism of anarcho-capitalism, criticism of individualism, criticism of anti-collectivism, criticism of anti-communism, criticism of popular culture, criticism of videogames, criticism of movies, criticism of the scientific method, and so many others. I do not regret making such kinds of criticisms and I would even do so much more if I had resources and I could develop arguments well. Anyway, I think I’ve made enough for now, despite I am just 21 years old and I’ve got enough problems with my parents because of that, but still, I should focus on my gemology studies (I am in the third period of gemology), despite I would like to study something else that doesn’t have calculations and such, crystallography and mineralogy are really hard to study, at least for me, and also, I really should focus on my studies and stop wasting my time on the Internet, despite it is hard because of the pandemic, anyway, I seriously should focus on my college and stop wasting time on the Internet, and learn new languages as well, I already know how to speak Portuguese, English, Spanish, French and Italian, and it is very good for me, anyway, I really like the concepts I’ve theorized and wrote, and I seriously hope I will be able to live a good life and find a way to deal with the whole cyberstalking and IP tracking things, but I know it will end soon as possible, but it will take some time. Anyway, I wish my best for you and that you publish your book about the Science of the Soul as soon as possible.

  7. We are not alone, that is very clear, there are aliens, spiritual beings, divine beings, gods, celestials, angelics, highly evolved beings and so many other kinds of beings among us, but those atheist zealots, skeptical zealots, scientistic zealots, rationalist zealots, and fanatical debunkers like the ones on Quora, Facebook, Youtube, Instagram, VK, TikTok, Reddit, social media as a whole, and in websites like Wikipedia, RationalWiki, Skeptical Science, Revista Questão de Ciência, Universo Racionalista, and so many others out there, and mentioning names of people like Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, Daniel Dennett, Michael Shermer, Richard Wiseman, Daniel Foschetti Gontijo, Bill Nye, Bibi Bailas, Dave Farina, Luciano Lobato, Bruno Farias, Carlos Orsi, and so many other names around there, cannot accept it nor even understand it as well, that is the why I am a harsh critic of atheism, skepticism, rationalism, scientism, science and debunkism, because the conditions of this world leaded me to become like that, without mention the ones who make fun of aliens and put them as evil, as Hollywood, Bethesda, Santa Monica Studio, Activision Blizzard, Ubisoft, Games Workshop, ID Software, 3D Realms, and so many others out there. Pure mix of atheist fanaticism, skeptical fanaticism, scientistic/scientific fanaticism, rationalist fanaticism, and fanatical debunkism with speciesism, xenospeciesism, theospeciesism, human supremacism, species xenophobia, tribalism and human nationalism. That is the why I am what I am now and I have no regrets for that, except for my family and for my studies.

  8. Those atheist zealots, scientistic zealots, skeptical zealots and rationalist zealots will never acccept there are aliens, spiritual beings, divine beings, gods, celestials, angelics, highly evolved beings and so many other kinds of beings among us, and it is very clear now, and there is nothing I can do or we can do about them, except question them and criticize them, thanks to the atheist zealot, skeptical zealot, scientistic zealot and neuroatheist of Daniel Foschetti Gontijo and of the enlightenment centrist and atheist/scientistic/skeptical zealot of Bibi Bailas and that enlightenment centrist and scientistic spiritual-materialist of @espiritualidademercantil (which I do not even know her name since he never said her name) I became as I am now and radicalized myself a lot, not just because of them, Quora also helped me a lot and Google too, and people often disagreeing with me and questioning me and me being very bad at arguing and debating, anyway, I will continue my criticisms towards them and I will never give up doing so. I’ve done a lot of things already related to such criticisms and questionings and I should do a lot more, those atheist zealots, skeptical zealots and scientistic zealots must be countered before it is too late, and my radicalization shows it very well, maybe I should take my meds even more or even stop using so much Internet, but I prefer post those kind of comments here than get myself even more hacked and IP tracked by spamming questions on Quora in 2-4 different languages and still get very few answers or get a lot of very condescending, passive-aggressive, sarcastic, and low quality answers on Quora, mainly answers by atheist zealots, scientistic zealots, skeptical zealots, atheist extremists, scientistic extremists, and skeptical extremists, and still the atheist-scientistic-skeptical search engine of Google putting their answers on the top-3 results and even as featured snippets that are worse than fake news.

  9. To be respected as a scientist (or an intellectual) in modern society, one must meet certain requirements, several of which relate to closed-mindedness about the most important and interesting concepts. One must deny the existence of God, and hold firm materialist views about death. One must dismiss, downplay or ignore the role of consciousness outside of a very circumscribed scope. And one must deny the potential validity all evidence of intelligent beings from other parts of the universe.

    Despite a very significant amount of evidence, of greatly varying quality, that extraterrestrial beings have interacted with our planet, most scientists speak as though there is literally no evidence whatsoever. I believe that, even if a public scientist had a life-changing personal experience involving extraterrestrials, he or she would never breathe a word of it to anyone, knowing that doing such would immediately destroy their career. Such things are absolute heresy in the modern scientific establishment, which clearly is less interested in science than it is in getting new grants and keeping a certain level of respectability in the scientific community.

    Because science has erected a forbidding fortress wall around the topic of extraterrestrial life, it has in large part dismissed the subject entirely. And in society, even displaying curiosity or openness towards these ideas is risking being considered insane or stupid. I think it’s tragic that as a society, we so often end up professing positions on matters which we do not actually believe, and this trend seems to be worsening over time, as more and more positions are considered off limits. How can we make the most of all of our tools and intellectual heritage if we are so cowardly and self-interested? In the name of science, scientists are destroying the core of science itself, which is free and open inquiry. This, despite all the history of the greatest scientists risking not only their reputations, but also their precious lives, to pursue truth.

  10. I don’t think we are alone at all, at least not according to Abzunianism, it is very likely that Intelligent Extraterrestrials are out there in our galaxy, maybe waiting to be discovered, or maybe they have just evolved and overcame the physical, the material, and the spacetime. We maybe will never know for now. Yet, I like how Abzunianism explains very well the existence of souls, spirits, gods, divine beings, spiritual beings, and supernatural beings with the help of philosophy, theology, evolutionary creationism (theistic evolution), theosophy, divinology, and of fractology/fractalogy/fractalology (the study of fractals in form of a philosophy/theology), and so other fields and areas of knowledge.

Leave a Reply