Are we alone?

Are we alone? Might Earth be the sole exception to an otherwise dead universe? We shouldn’t be. The ingredients for life are everywhere — life should be common. But then, where is everyone?

This article explains the three possible answers to this question. By the time you finish reading, you will have a firm grasp of the relevant science, enough to form an opinion on which answer is probably right.

Requirements of Life

To arise, life needs three things: Matter, Energy, and Time.

All can be found wherever there are stars. Each star is like a scratch-off lottery ticket — a chance to win by having the right combination. The prize: the universe gains a new planet full of life.

The chance a ticket pays off remains unknown, but science has made progress in estimating the odds.

Given the huge number of tickets, (there are 10^{22} stars in the observable universe), the chances seem good that more than one has paid off.

Let’s review the specific requirements life has for matter, energy and time.


Matter is the stuff life is made of, the building blocks. These are the chemical elements — hydrogen, oxygen, carbon, nitrogen, and so on. These elements exist everywhere. They’re created as byproducts of fusion — the ash of nuclear fires which burn in every star.

The nitrogen in our DNA, the calcium in our teeth, the iron in our blood, the carbon in our apple pies were made in the interiors of collapsing stars. We are made of star stuff.

Carl Sagan

Hydrogen, oxygen, carbon, and nitrogen make up over 99% of the atoms in our bodies. The others are needed only in trace amounts. These same four elements that compose the bulk of our bodies are also the most common chemically-active elements in the solar system.

The same physics and chemistry that operate here apply everywhere in the universe. The familiar elements on Earth are found in every star and galaxy we see. This is more than conjecture. Through analysis of light astronomers can determine the chemical composition of far away stars, nebulae, and galaxies.

Radio telescopes can detect the presence of organic molecules in the center of the Milky Way Galaxy
The ALMA observatory detected complex organic molecules in a gas cloud 27,000 light years away. Image Credit: Y. Beletsky (LCO)/ESO

Complex organic (carbon-containing) molecules, the precursors to life including amino acids, have been detected in distant star-forming gas clouds, or stellar nurseries near the center of the galaxy.

So you are made of the same stuff as stars, planets, comets and gas clouds.

Given the availability of these vital ingredients, the whole universe is filled with the matter needed for life. But life still needs energy and enough time to evolve.


All life feeds on energy. Energy forestalls the natural tendency towards disorder. Any time order is created, such as in growing a body, energy must be expended.

Plants obtain energy from sunlight and store it in chemical bonds. Animals get energy from plants, by eating them and breaking those bonds to release energy, or they eat other animals.

The energy that drives the entire food chain and powers all living things on Earth started in the core of our sun. The same fusion responsible for cooking the chemicals of life provides stars, and life, their energy.

Though all life needs energy, not every life form gets it from sunlight.

Europa, one of Jupiter’s moons, appears on the surface to be a frozen ball of ice. But scientists believe that 10 miles under its frozen surface lies an ocean with twice the liquid water of Earth’s oceans.

What provides the energy to melt this ice? The tides!

Tidal friction creates heat that could melt the ice and provide energy for life. Ultimately this energy comes from the spinning of Jupiter. As Europa’s own tidal forces drag on Jupiter, Jupiter’s rotation slows and its days become longer.

The oldest known lifeforms used geothermal, rather than solar energy. They got their energy from hydrothermal vents like the Lost City — undersea geysers powered by the heat of Earth’s interior.

Life uses energy wherever it finds it.

Fossilized hematite tubes are the oldest evidence of life on earth
Fossilized hematite tubes from the NSB hydrothermal vent deposits are the oldest evidence of life on Earth.
Image Credit: Matthew Dodd, University College London.

In 2017, researchers discovered fossilized hematite tubes that are 4.28 billion years old. This is the oldest evidence for life known. In comparison, Earth is 4.54 billion years old and its oceans, 4.41 billion years.

Once conditions permitted, it didn’t take long for life to start.


The final requirement for life is time — time for life to arise and evolve.

After the formation of Earth, it took a few hundred million years for life to appear. Several billion more were needed to evolve multicellular life. It took a total of 4.3 billion years to get to mammals, and 4.5 billion to yield a tool-making civilization.

To progress through these stages required an environment that remains stable for long periods.

The large stars exhaust their nuclear fuel and explode or collapse after millions of years. This time is too short to host planets with complex life. But in their demise they give hope to others. The elements baked in their cores is what enables life in other star systems.

This explains why life could not appear much earlier in the universe’s history: several generations of large stars had to form, live, die, and explode to spread their ash–the stuff of life–into interstellar space.

Smaller stars are needed to tend to a life-bearing planet. They offer sufficient time for life to do its thing. The lifespan of a star depends on its mass. The smaller its size the longer it lives. Medium-sized stars like our sun last for billions of years. Smaller stars, like red dwarfs, can live for trillions.

Time is one thing the universe is not in short supply of. But life also needs stability.

For a planet to nurture life, it must provide stability. It needs a stable orbit and a host star with a consistent brightness. The planet must also avoid potentially life-ending calamities — asteroid impacts, super volcanoes, and gamma-ray bursts.

Earth has had her own share of catastrophes. The Moon is thought to have formed when Earth collided with a Mars-sized planet called Theia. It’s also believed that at one time the entire surface of Earth was covered in ice.

Despite these, and many asteroid impacts and super volcanoes, once it got started life has held on.

Life’s Tenacity

Life has been found as deep as 19 kilometers underground, 77 kilometers up in the atmosphere, in lakes under the ice of Antarctica and in the scalding 80°C pools of Yellowstone. Where life can exist it will.

Rapidity of Life

Life took hold nearly as soon as conditions permitted.

Of Earth’s 4.54 billion year history, 94% of that time it’s been home to life.

If life arose relatively quickly on Earth, then it could be common in the universe.

Stephen Blair Hedges

Despite many attempts by nature to kill it off, life hasn’t let go since it took hold. Life is hardy.


As an indication of the extreme conditions life might tolerate on other planets, biologists on Earth have taken particular interest in extremophiles — creatures that can survive under extreme conditions.

The Bacillus bacteria has been found to survive temperatures of 420°C (788 °F), and have been revived from a dormant state after 10,000 years. One report even claims to have revived it after being locked in a piece of amber for 25 million years.

Perhaps the most resilient species on Earth is the Tardigrade, also known as water bears. They’re about 1 mm long and look like tiny 8-legged hippos. They can be found almost anywhere.

Water bears are nearly indestructible
A water bear, also known as a tardigrade, can survive almost anywhere. Image Credit: EYE OF SCIENCE / GETTY IMAGES

Water bears live mainly in fresh water and moss, but have been found on the tops of mountains, at the bottom of the sea, in hot springs and rainforests and even in the icy antarctic.

They can survive ionizing radiation, dehydration, starvation, being chilled to near absolute zero and heated to over 150°C. Tardigrades can tolerate exposure to the vacuum of space as well as pressures 600 times that of Earth’s atmosphere. They can put themselves in suspended animation and reanimate a century later.

The European Space Agency sent water bears to space to be exposed to solar radiation, cosmic rays and the vacuum — two thirds survived. Some of the females even laid healthy eggs while in space.

If creatures can be so tough as to survive in space without suits, could they hitch rides to other worlds?


A theory called panspermia proposes that it’s not just the elements of life that are spread throughout space, but the seeds of life itself — primitive organisms that can survive trips through space and colonize suitable worlds they land on.

It sounds outlandish, but there are indications it’s possible. Though no mission to Mars has ever returned with a sample of Martian rocks, you can see a rock from Mars at the London Natural History Museum.

In fact, to date over 266 Martian rocks have been found on Earth. How did they get here?

These rocks were blasted into space by impact events on the surface of Mars. Once in space they floated for unknown amounts of time before getting caught in Earth’s gravity, and falling to the surface.

Mars had oceans before Earth. Some scientists believe life began on Mars.

An ancient Mars once held oceans and the promise of life.
Mars may have had oceans while Earth was still recovering from its collision with Theia. Image Credit: NASA/GSFC

If life began on Mars, it is possible that it hitched a ride to Earth on a Martian meteorite.

In 1996, NASA scientists found evidence of fossilized microbes in a Martian meteorite. The meteorite was discovered in the Allan Hills of Antarctica in 1984, giving it the designation: Allan Hills 84001.

Today, rock 84001 speaks to us across all those billions of years and millions of miles. It speaks of the possibility of life. If this discovery is confirmed, it will surely be one of the most stunning insights into our universe that science has ever uncovered. Its implications are as far-reaching and awe-inspiring as can be imagined. Even as it promises answers to some of our oldest questions, it poses still others even more fundamental.

President Bill Clinton

But the evidence was speculative: it was based on nothing more than microscopic bacteria-like shapes found in the rock. The scientific community did not accept this as definitive evidence of life on Mars.

But in 2019, Hungarian scientists studying another meteorite of the same region, Allan Hills 77005, had a significant finding. It turned out these bacteria-like shapes not only had similar forms and size to bacteria, but chemical analysis revealed mineralized organic compounds–chemicals we would expect to find if these shapes are indeed the fossilized remains of once living cells.

If the first life did arrive here on a meteorite, we’re not Earthlings but Martians.

Though life may have started on Mars, complex life could not arise there. Mars’s feeble gravity couldn’t hold on to her ocean or thick atmosphere. As they leaked into space, Mars became progressively colder and drier. This fact demonstrates the equally important requirement of time.

Earth’s oceans are destined to suffer a similar fate. But not for another 1.1 billion years.

In April 2019, the Beresheet lunar lander — a privately funded project — accidentally crashed on the moon. Among its cargo was a sample of water bears, who are believed to have survived.

We believe the chances of survival for the tardigrades… are extremely high.

Nova Spivack

So there is life on other worlds. It came from Earth and it’s now on the Moon–panspermia in action.

The Fermi Paradox

Enrico Fermi is the architect of the nuclear age. He built the first nuclear reactor by arranging tons of Uranium and graphite in a massive pile in downtown Chicago. The reactor was built in secret in an abandoned racket court under Stagg Field at the University of Chicago.

The undertaking was top secret–part of the Manhattan Project. Despite the dangers of building a reactor in a densely populated area, project leaders trusted Fermi’s calculations.

In the summer of 1950, Fermi made a visit to the Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory. At the time, Edward Teller and others were working on the fusion bomb–a bomb that would release the energy of the stars on Earth.

During a casual lunch with fellow nuclear scientists Edward Teller, Herbert York and Emil Konopinski, Fermi blurted “But where is everybody?

The result of his question was general laughter because of the strange fact that in spite of Fermi’s question coming from the clear blue, everybody around the table seemed to understand at once that he was talking about extraterrestrial life.

Edward Teller

In the ensuing conversation, Fermi did some rough calculations. He estimated the number of stars, the fraction of stars with planets, the fraction of those planets the right distance from their star, and so on, to arrive at a rough approximation of the number of planets with life.

The number he arrived at was so great, Fermi concluded we should have been visited many times over.

Here was a contradiction. On one hand, the calculations say we should have been visited. On the other hand, the lack of evidence suggests we haven’t.

This contradiction is the Fermi Paradox.

The Drake Equation

In 1961, the astrophysicist Frank Drake formalized Fermi’s estimations in The Drake Equation.

It is a simple formula. It simply multiplies together seven values to provide a final estimate for: N — the number of presently detectable alien civilizations in our galaxy.

N = R_{*} \cdot f_{p} \cdot n_{e} \cdot f_{l} \cdot f_{i} \cdot f_{c} \cdot L

Each of the seven numbers is a parameter whose estimate can be refined over time as new data comes in.

The parameters span distinct areas of human knowledge, including astrophysics, biology, evolution, anthropology, and technology. As our knowledge concerning these parameters improves, so too does our estimate for N.

Below is a Drake Equation calculator. You can change the inputs and see what kinds of estimates you obtain for the number of intelligent civilizations that are out there and presently detectable.

R (1.5 – 3) annual rate of star formation in our galaxy
fp (0.2 – 1) fraction of stars with planets
ne (0.1 – 5) environments suitable for life per star with planets
fl (~1) of suitable environments, the fraction that develop life
fi (0.01 – 1) the fraction of life that develops intelligence
fc (0.1 – 0.2) the fraction of intelligent life that emits detectable signals
L (>100) the number of years intelligent life remains detectable
Detectable Civilizations:

One pattern you may notice from playing with the equation is how difficult it is to get the number of predicted civilizations in the universe down to one. It requires what seem to be insanely conservative estimates for the parameters. This is a reflection of the sheer quantity of stars in the observable universe.

There are some hundred billion stars in our galaxy, and there are about a hundred billion visible galaxies. This amounts to 10^{22} stars. Could Earth be the only civilization in the observable universe?

This requires the probability of a star system producing intelligent life to be extremely low — on the order of one out of 10^{22}. That’s one in 10 billion trillion or: 1 followed by 22 zeros. To appreciate the magnitude of this number it helps to see it written out: \text{1 in 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000}.

Even if life is very rare, so long as it is not incredibly rare, the universe ought to be teeming with it.

One in 10 billion trillion is incredibly small. To me, this implies that other intelligent, technology producing species very likely have evolved before us. Think of it this way. Before our result you’d be considered a pessimist if you imagined the probability of evolving a civilization on a habitable planet were, say, one in a trillion. But even that guess, one chance in a trillion, implies that what has happened here on Earth with humanity has in fact happened about 10 billion other times over cosmic history!

Frank Drake

To imagine just how many stars there are, try to imagine all the grains of sand on a beach. One handful of sand contains about 10,000 grains. More than the few thousand stars you might see in a perfectly dark sky.

Yet the total number of stars in the observable universe exceeds all the grains of sand on all of Earth’s beaches. You would need 10,000 Earths to have as many sand grains as there are stars.

How likely is it that of all these grains, only one is blessed with life?

Our Search for ET

Today there are four tracks in our search for extraterrestrial life:

  • Listening for intelligent signals
  • Looking for habitable planets
  • Searching for alien artifacts
  • Sending our friendly greetings

Listening for Signals

The Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) began in earnest in 1984. Frank Drake was one of the SETI Institute’s first leaders. The mission of SETI is to understand the origin of life and the evolution of intelligence.

The Arecibo Radio Telescope in Puerto Rico is one of the most sensitive and powerful antennae on Earth.
The Arecibo Radio Telescope in Puerto Rico is one of the most sensitive and powerful antennae on Earth.

SETI employs a network of radio telescopes to comb the sky for transmissions by technological civilizations.

To date, SETI has scanned only a minuscule fraction of the sky. So far, there have been no confirmed detections of alien signals. However, one detected signal defies all explanation.

In 1977, Dr. Jerry Ehman was a volunteer at SETI. One day, he looked over data collected from the Big Ear radio telescope a few days prior. The telescope was listening in the direction of the Sagittarius constellation.

It was then that Ehman noticed something that astonished him and his colleagues.

I came across the strangest signal I had ever seen, and immediately scribbled ‘Wow!‘ next to it. At first, I thought it was an earth signal reflected from space debris, but after I studied it further, I found that couldn’t be the case.

Jerry Ehman

The event is known as the Wow! signal.

Nothing like it has ever been observed since. The Wow! signal is surprising on many levels:

  • No known astronomical phenomenon produces a signal like what was seen
  • The signal was strong and clear, many times stronger than the background noise
  • The signal was at 1420 MHz, the exact frequency astronomers expect ET to use, and in a frequency range where international law prohibits transmissions (1400 – 1427 MHz is restricted)
  • The signal’s Doppler shift indicated it came from a fixed point in the sky not moving with the Earth or solar system. This rules out any spacecraft, aircraft or terrestrial origin.
  • NASA confirmed there were no space probes in the direction of the sky at the time
  • The direction of the signal was 90 degrees off from any planet including Pluto
  • Despite hundreds of attempts to detect the signal again, it was never seen since

The Big Ear Telescope points in a fixed direction and only sweeps across the sky as the Earth spins. Accordingly, the Big Ear Telescope was only able to hear the Wow! signal for 72 seconds. These 72 seconds represent the only concrete evidence we have of extraterrestrial intelligence, and it’s far from conclusive.

But we don’t have to wait for alien life to make the first move. We can go out and look for it.

Looking for Planets

When the moon crosses between the Earth and Sun, the result is a solar eclipse. During such an eclipse, the sky darkens as the Moon’s shadow crosses over the Earth.

But the moon is not the only body that can create an eclipse. Eclipses that don’t fully block out the sun are known as transits. This is when we see an astronomical body, such as Mercury or Venus, cross the disc of the sun.

Venus transiting the sun in 2012.
Venus transiting the sun in 2012. The next transit of Venus will not recur until 2117. Image Credit NASA/SDO
Transits by Mercury occur much more frequently. The most recent was in 2019.

Whenever a body crosses between Earth and the sun, the result is an apparent dimming. Less light makes it to Earth as a result of it being blocked by that body, be it the Moon, Venus or Mercury.

Astronomers realized this dimming effect could reveal planets in far away star systems.

Finding Habitable Planets

The Kepler Space Telescope remained in service from 2009 to 2018. In that time, it monitored over half a million stars for periodic dimming–evidence of transiting planets. Based on the amount of dimming and how long it lasts, astronomers can determine both the size of the planet and the speed of its orbit.

Using the laws of planetary motion formulated by Johannes Kepler, the speed a planet orbits its star depends on its distance from that star. Thus, the patterns of dimming of a star give scientists enough data to know if there is a planet in the habitable zone of that star.

The habitable zone, also called the Goldilocks zone, is a distance from a star that’s not too hot, nor too cold, but just right. For instance, Earth sits sandwiched between blistering Venus and freezing Mars.

The Kepler Space Telescope was a great success. Kepler discovered 2,662 planets beyond the solar system. Moreover, its data gives us better estimates for two parameters of the Drake Equation.

The fraction of stars with planets f_{p} appears to be very close to 1.

Kepler was also able to provide estimates for the number of environments n_{e} suitable for life in each star system. Kepler’s data indicates at least 20% of star systems have a planet in the habitable zone.

Artist’s conception of a habitable-zone planets identified by the Kepler satellite.
Artist’s conception of habitable-zone planets identified by the Kepler satellite. Image Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech

One habitable zone planet, K2-18b, is especially interesting. The planet was noticed by Kepler and found to be orbiting a star about 100 light years away–close enough for Hubble to analyze the planet’s atmosphere.

In 2019, researchers determined the atmosphere contains water vapor — the first discovery of water on a planet beyond the solar system. The concentrations may even be high enough for the planet to have clouds.

Given the success of Kepler, NASA moved to immediately replace it once the satellite ran out of fuel.

In 2018, NASA launched a new and improved version of Kepler, called the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS). TESS is able to monitor 400 times more sky than Kepler, and its greater sensitivity will allow it to detect even smaller planets on stars that are much closer to Earth.

But a planet being in the right place isn’t an indication it has life. A new experiment aims to correct that.

Searching for Signs of Life

Just as astronomers detected organic molecules in remote regions of the galaxy, new experiments plan to analyze the atmospheres of exoplanets to look for biogenic gases. These are gases created by biological processes and if observed would be telltale signatures for the presence of life.

Mirror Assembly of the James Webb Space Telescope
NASA Scientists looking at the Mirror Assembly for the James Webb Space Telescope. Image Credit: NASA/Chris Gunn

No apparatus has yet been built with the required sensitivity to analyze atmospheres of planets beyond the solar system. But there is one device that will: the James Webb Telescope, the successor to Hubble.

The James Webb Telescope may provide definitive proof for life beyond the solar system. But we won’t know for some time. The Telescope is scheduled for launch in March 2021.

Searching for Artifacts

If aliens have visited our solar system in the past, they may have left behind signs of their presence.

When humans went to the moon, we left footprints, a flag, a plaque, even bags of feces. Absent interference, these signs might survive for eons. If humanity is not careful, they may even outlast us.

If alien races perform engineering feats on planetary or stellar scales, if they leave behind probes, signaling stations, or other artifacts, it is possible we may one day discover one.

Von Neumann Probes

In the 1940s, the polymath John von Neumann invented a machine that could reproduce itself. Crossing the idea of a self-reproducing machine with a space probe resulted in the idea of von Neumann probes–space probes that could stop in a star system to reproduce and then disperse outward in all directions to each of the next closest star systems. Such probes would only need a few million years to reach every star in the galaxy.

An artifact of unknown origin is discovered buried on the Moon in "2001: A Space Odyssey"
An artifact of unknown origin is discovered buried on the Moon in “2001: A Space Odyssey”

This idea served as the basis of Arthur C. Clarke’s short story The Sentinel, which itself was the basis of Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey. In the story, humans discover that aliens passing through our star system eons ago left something behind — a token of their presence in the form of a beacon on the moon.

As we turn our eyes toward the heavens, we may notice other, less subtle, clues of alien intelligence.


Intelligence and technology gave us the power to alter our environment.

Some of our changes are visible from space. For instance, city lights cause parts of the Earth to glow at night.

Our cities glow on the dark side of the Earth.
Our cities glow on the dark side of the Earth. Image Credit: NASA Earth Observatory, Robert Simmon

As our technology increases, so does our our ability to change our environment. According to the Kardashev scale, present humans rank below a Type I civilization. Type I civilizations make use of all the energy resources available to a planet.

The next stage according to this scale, is a Type II civilization — a civilization that makes use of all the energy output by their home star. This requires technology to build stellar engines.

Stellar engines have been envisioned as large Dyson spheres or swarms of solar cells that orbit the star to capture large fractions of its energy output.

Stellar engines would change the spectrum of the star in a very noticeable way, but none have been detected so far, though Tabby’s star has caught the imaginations of many.

The strange behavior of Tabby’s star was detected by the Kepler Space Telescope and reported by Tabetha Boyajian who noticed irregular fluctuations in the star’s brightness. The behavior remains unexplained.

Sending our Greetings

Perhaps aliens are shy. They might be waiting for us to make the first move, to signal our willingness to talk.

Since the 1970s, humans have made several overtures to invite interstellar conversation.


In 1974, renovations on the giant Arecibo Radio Telescope in Puerto Rico were completed. To mark the occasion, the powerful dish was used to broadcast a message to the stars, it is known as the Arecibo message.

The Arecibo Message is man's first attempt at making contact with an alien race.
The Arecibo Message is man’s first attempt at making contact with an alien race.

The message was written by Frank Drake with help from Carl Sagan and others. It is meant to be easily deciphered by anyone who might intercept it. It was encoded in binary, as a series of 1,679 black and white pixels. When arranged in a grid of 73 rows by 23 columns it forms a simple pictorial diagram.

The message encodes a numbering scheme, the atomic numbers of the elements that compose our DNA, a picture of a person, and the radio antenna that broadcast the message.

A telescope of an equivalent size and sensitivity to the Arecibo Telescope on the receiving end could pick up the signal from a distance of tens of thousands of light years–on the other side of the galaxy.

Decades passed before any other deliberate attempt was made to speak to aliens. In 2012, the Arecibo Telescope was once again used to send a message.

This time it sent a reply to the part of the sky from which the Wow! signal was detected 35 years earlier. The message consisted of 10,000 Twitter messages solicited by the National Geographic Channel.

Who would have guessed that Twitter could be used to communicate with ET?

Greeting Cards

In 1977, the four outer planets Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune were aligned in a way that would not repeat until 2153. It provided the perfect opportunity to leave the solar system.

NASA took advantage of the opportunity and launched two robots, the Voyager 1 and Voyager 2 space probes. On their way out, they were boosted by stealing a tiny bit of energy from each of the four gas giants, using a technique known as a gravitational slingshot.

The gravitational slingshot: trajectories of Voyager 1 and 2. Credit The JLR Group.

The speed is gained by falling in towards the planet, riding behind it as it orbits the sun. The effect slows the orbit of the planet ever so slightly. The years for each of these four planets are now a bit longer. But in slowing down Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune, the speed of the Voyager probes was greatly boosted.

It provided them with enough speed to break free of the sun’s gravity. Both probes are now free to roam the galaxy. It took over 4 decades, but as of 2018 both probes have left the solar system.

Despite being over 20 billion kilometers away, we remain in contact with them via their 23 watt radio transmitters–surprising given that’s only a few times stronger than a cell phone’s 3 watt transmitter.

Each of the probes contains a greeting card, in the form of a Golden Record.

"The Sounds of Earth" are recorded on Golden Records on board each of the Voyager Probes.
“The Sounds of Earth” are recorded on Golden Records on board each of the Voyager Probes.

The records contain a selection of greetings in various languages, music, and sounds from nature.

This is a present from a small, distant world, a token of our sounds, our science, our images, our music, our thoughts and our feelings. We are attempting to survive our time so we may live into yours.

President Jimmy Carter

The records are made of copper and plated in gold. They’re designed to last for billions of years. If the sun is to one day envelop the Earth, these probes may constitute the only evidence humanity was ever here.

Solutions to Fermi’s Paradox

Two possibilities exist: either we are alone in the Universe or we are not. Both are equally terrifying.

Arthur C. Clarke

Thanks to Kepler, we can estimate there are 40 billion rocky planets in our galaxy with the right orbits to have liquid water. Despite this, science has yet to find solid evidence of alien life.

Our galaxy is not filled with stellar engines, radio beacons, or self-replicating probes. Nor have little green men landed at the UN to establish an embassy. Our lack of evidence is not from lack of trying. How then do we square the idea that alien life should be common with the plain fact that we have yet to find any proof?

There are many proposed answers to Fermi’s Paradox. But all fall loosely into one of three categories:

  1. We are alone: Life, or intelligent life, is rare. It’s either hard to evolve, or too fragile to maintain.
  2. They isolate: Aliens choose not to spread through the galaxy making noticeable changes to it.
  3. They are here: Aliens are here but they conceal their presence from us.

Each of these possibilities is consistent with existing observations. To get an idea for which type of answer is most likely correct, we must review the proposed solutions in more detail.

We are Alone

Physically speaking, anything that can happen in one time or place can happen in another. All of science is based on this notion of reproducibility: given the same starting conditions, the same outcomes result.

If the universe is infinite, which by all indications it seems to be, then the possibility of life combined with an infinite extent of space statistically guarantees other life, including intelligent life, exists out there.

But this doesn’t tell us how near or far that life is. If intelligent life is so rare that it occurs on less than one star in 10^{22}, then we might be the only example in the observable universe.

The vast distances implied by being the only intelligence in the observable universe would, for all practical purposes, mean we are alone, even if infinite other intelligences exist across our infinite universe.

Life is Rare

The most obvious answer to Fermi’s paradox is simply that he got his math wrong. He may have overlooked some Great Filter–something difficult to have, obtain, or pass, but necessary for life.

For example, it might be important, but also rare, to have a large moon and a large planet like Jupiter nearby. Both help clear away and deflect debris in the inner solar system. This debris might otherwise plague Earth with perpetual planetary bombardment from asteroids, comets, and meteors.

Comet Shoemaker–Levy 9 impacts Jupiter's southern hemisphere at 60 kilometers a second.
On July 16, 1994, Jupiter took one for the team. It absorbed the full brunt of the Comet Shoemaker–Levy 9, which impacted Jupiter’s southern hemisphere at 60 kilometers a second.

This idea is known as the Rare Earth Hypothesis. It is a proposed solution to the Fermi Paradox.

Other proposed rare coincidences relate to the fact that Earth has a fairly active interior. This interior both creates a protective magnetic shield and also makes for geothermal vents. These vents may have played a key role in kick-starting life.

The hypothesized collision with Theia would be a relatively uncommon event. But it gave Earth her large moon. The moon creates tides, which create tide pools. Tide pools also might have played a role in the appearance of life–they provided a place for the chemical stuff of life to mix together and concentrate.

The theory remains hotly debated. The counterevidence for life being difficult is the speed at which it arose on Earth. It appeared relatively quickly, within a fraction of a billion years after Earth’s oceans formed.

The other argument is statistical. For Earth to be the only planet with life, life would have to be incredibly rare.

It is conceivable that with a billion year head-start, an intelligent civilization 100 million light years away could spread to us using von Neumann probes. For Earth to be the only planet with life for a 100 million light years, life would have to occur on less than one out of every 200 trillion star systems.

More data will be required to settle the question of the Rare Earth Hypothesis. It may come within a few years, when results of surveys for biogenic gasses are completed by the James Webb Telescope.

It could also be disproved if conclusive evidence is found indicating primitive life on Mars, as suggested by chemical analysis of the bacteria-like shapes on the Allan Hills 77005 Martian meteorite.

Intelligence is Rare

According to this solution to the Paradox, life may be common, but evolving complex intelligent life is not. This would explain why we haven’t heard radio signals or found alien megastructures.

Intelligence is a key factor in the success and survival of the human species. But for most of the millions of other species on this planet, it is not. Might we be biased in assuming evolution favors intelligence?

Moreover, perhaps there are barriers to evolving through the various required stages. It may be that evolving multicellular life is difficult–after all it took several billion years to get from single-celled organisms to animals.

While evolving intelligence is not inevitable, there are reasons to believe intelligence is favored. The evidence for this is convergent evolution–independent branches of the evolutionary tree separately evolved intelligence.

Outside of our own primate lineage there are: dolphins and elephants among mammals, grey parrots and crows among the birds, and even the mollusks have octopuses and cuttlefish.

A crow bends a wire into a hook to get at a piece of food.

Greater intelligence provides advantages to those species who evolve it. It enables predators to out-think their prey, and social creatures to out-think each other.

Given that intelligence has arisen multiple times from different lines of evolution, it is reasonable to suspect that it will arise so long as life can bridge the gap from single-celled life to multicellular life.

We are the First

Perhaps neither life, nor intelligence is inherently rare–we just happen to be the first.

This theory is in line with the understanding that life should be common, and intelligence should be favored by evolution. It also explains the complete lack of observational evidence for other alien civilizations.

However, the view that we’re first runs counter to two facets of our cosmological understanding.

The first is that life could have arisen billions of years earlier than it did on Earth. Rocky planets formed in the first billion years after the Big Bang, and carbon was abundant after 1.5 billion years. We know carbon and other necessary elements were available then by looking at old far-away galaxies.

It’s estimated that the first intelligent civilizations existed as early as 5 billion years ago. Given the rate of formation and destruction of star systems, the average extraterrestrial civilization has a 1.7 billion year head start on us. In the words of Carl Sagan, “We’re Johnny-come-latelies.”

The second cosmological idea this runs counter to is the Copernican principle. The Copernican principle says we should not expect to hold any privileged position in the universe. Statistically, its far more likely that we occupy some average or middle position, than hold a special spot like being first.

If billions of civilizations are expected to live in this universe, the odds that we’re the first would correspondingly be one in billions.

Intelligence Destroys Itself

In a twist of fate, perhaps Fermi’s own work provides the very answer to his question. Fermi ushered in the nuclear age, paving the way to technologies that could bring about our destruction.

Fermi's work unleashed the power of the atom on Earth.
Fermi’s work unleashed the power of the atom on Earth.

What’s scarier is that nuclear weapons are just the first of many technologies that carry such a burden.

We now contend with the risks from biological weapons, AI, nanotechnology, and environmental destruction. Some even fear that modern physics experiments like particle accelerators pose an existential risk–though this particular threat is low given that higher energy collisions occur naturally.

As doomsday technology becomes more broadly available, an ever-increasing number of hands will hover over big red buttons. It is an unstable situation. Even if there’s just a 1% chance per year that one of these technologies wipes us out, that means humanity has less than a 5% chance of surviving the next 300 years.

If we’re not careful, we could spell our own doom. But even if many or most intelligent species wipe themselves out, it seems unlikely that all of them do. Some should survive to inherit the stars.

A single message from space will show that it is possible to live through technological adolescence.

Carl Sagan

Humanity has so far managed to survive perils of our making. It’s incumbent on us to keep it that way.

They Isolate

If intelligence exists throughout the universe, we haven’t noticed.

But rather than assume this is because nothing is out there, it could also be that we’re not looking in the right places or for the right things. We expect aliens to conquer the universe, transforming it in their wake, but perhaps they choose to keep to themselves where they might explore the limitless depths of inner space.

They are Quiet

The search for SETI assumed radio transmission will be how alien species communicate. We expect alien civilizations to be noisy in the radio spectrum–filling the airwaves with their music and television.

But SETI is a reflection of our 1970s technology–a time when TV and radio broadcasts were the primary means of distributing information. Since then, we’ve largely shifted away from broadcast TV to closed-circuit and point-to-point systems: cable TV, fiber optics, satellite dishes, and Internet streaming services.

In less than a generation we've transformed our communications technologies.
In less than a generation we’ve transformed our communications technologies.

These technologies offer more channels and data transmission. They’re also quiet. An alien civilization would be unable to intercept what you watch over Netflix.

Though we still use radio, technologies are moving away from central broadcasts towards localized low-power systems, like cellular networks. Spread spectrum technologies increase the reliability and bandwidth of our transmissions, but also make them harder for outsiders to differentiate from background noise.

Even if civilizations last for millions or billions of years, the window during which they transmit openly into space with high-power radios might last only a few decades. Lasers enable more efficient and higher throughput communication, but only recently has anyone started to look for alien laser transmissions.

What about the lack of alien megastructures, like Dyson swarms?

It turns out even the technology of our science fiction is far behind the possible technology of alien civilizations.

Building a Dyson swarm around a star requires vast amounts of matter and energy. Entire planets would need to be disassembled to provide the raw materials. In the end, the Dyson swarm would capture only 0.7% of the energy present in the mass-energy of the star and it would take the entire lifetime of the star to capture.

An advanced civilization could much more easily construct a black hole engine. Such an engine can turn 100% of mass into energy–142 times the efficiency of fusion. Moreover, anything you feed it is fuel. Just drop something into it and the black hole turns it into pure energy in the form of Hawking radiation.

A mountain-sized black hole would give off X-rays and gamma rays, at a rate of about 10 million megawatts, enough to power the world’s electricity supply.

Stephen Hawking

A civilization using micro black holes to meet its energy needs would be very difficult to detect.

Black hole engines were inconceivable before 1974 when Hawking proved black holes radiate. The technologies available to civilizations millions of years ahead of us may be less fathomable than a black hole engine would be to an ancient Babylonian–we still don’t even have a good understanding of gravity.

Space is Too Big

Space is big. So big that many believe interstellar travel is so resource and time intensive that no intelligent civilization would seriously bother with it. This would account for why we haven’t been visited.

Take, for example, the fastest thing humans have ever launched: the Voyager space probes. Voyager 1 is traveling at 61,200 kilometers per hour (17 kilometers per second). Despite this speed, it will take Voyager 40,000 years to even approach a nearby star.

These speeds were obtained with chemical rockets–fundamentally the same technology as rockets used by the Chinese 800 years ago. Both burn chemicals in a confined space to blow hot gas out a nozzle.

We know it’s possible to do much better. In the late 1950s, the top secret Project Orion aimed to build a nuclear pulse rocket that could reach the stars in a human lifetime. This design uses a series of controlled nuclear detonations behind the vehicle to propel it forward.

Pulsed explosion propulsion was successfully demonstrated as part of Project Orion.

In 1968, Freeman Dyson calculated that a nuclear pulse design like Orion could achieve 10% the speed of light (17,634 times faster than Voyager). At this speed we could reach the nearest star in 43 years.

But Orion would cost hundreds of billions of dollars–ten times more than the Apollo program. Moreover, the 1963 Partial Test Ban Treaty prohibited nuclear detonations in space. Project Orion was canceled in 1964.

Since then, we’ve found better ways of reaching the stars. One of those ideas is the StarChip.

The miniaturization of computers allows fully functional spacecraft, complete with cameras, sensors, controllers, and antennae to be built on a computer chip. The entire craft could weigh less than a gram.

Owing to its size, it could reach 20% the speed of light, accelerated by a collection of ground-based lasers.

Like the first explorers who sailed Earth’s oceans, we can sail to the stars on a beam of light.

Plans for the StarChip were made in 2016. If they follow through, we could reach the nearest stars by 2050. Once built, the system can launch thousands of the StarChips. It would take the lasers only about 20 minutes to accelerate each StarChip to 20% of the speed of light (60,000 kilometers / second).

At 10% the speed of light, self-replicating von Neumann probes could cover the galaxy in a million years.

These time scales are large in human time frames, but they are small on evolutionary scales. If Earth is an indication, it takes about 5 billion years to evolve a technological species, but only 1 million years (0.02% of that time) for that species to fill the galaxy with its technology.

On evolutionary time scales, the galaxy is accessible. Earth itself has lapped the Milky Way 18 times in her history. Given ample time, the bigness of space is no barrier to a technological species that wants to fill the galaxy. With a 1.7 billion year head start, technological civilizations have had plenty enough time.

If space is not too big, the mystery remains. Why don’t we see clear evidence of anyone’s presence?

Assuming intelligent species arise and last, then only two explanations are left. They either universally decide not to spread outward, or they do spread outward but remain hidden.

They Leave our Universe

At some point aliens might discover technology that allows them to leave the universe, to transcend their physical existence, or perhaps even to create and explore realities of their own choosing.

Traveling from star system to star system would become repetitive, tedious, and, given the time scales, would be immensely boring. Having the technology to explore infinite possibilities from their own home, advanced civilizations might quickly lose interest in exploring outer space.

This solution to the Fermi Paradox is known as the Transcension Hypothesis.

But is leaving the physical universe possible?

Leaving the universe is possible in a figurative sense. When someone is deeply engrossed in their device, or a computer game, they are in a sense in their own reality.

Future virtual reality technology will make this truer still. Given the exponential progress of computing technology, (getting ever smaller, denser, and faster), it may soon be possible to live in virtual reality.

The best physically possible computers, those of the greatest speed and storage capacity, look little different from a black hole. To perform a computation, matter would be dropped in to the hole in a specific pattern, and the hole would perform the desired computation and return the result via Hawking radiation.

The transcension hypothesis proposes the final evolutionary stage of life is to live in black holes.
The transcension hypothesis proposes the final evolutionary stage of life is to live in black holes. Image Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech

Black holes are in a sense detached from our universe. If an alien civilization builds black hole computers, and if they put themselves into virtual reality programs run on these computers, then in a very literal sense such a civilization will have physically left our universe–they would no longer be part of our spacetime and would live in a designer reality that’s effectively causally isolated from our universe.

According to the Kardashev Scale, technological civilizations advance by consuming ever more energy: the energy of their planet, their star, and eventually their galaxy. But maybe we got it wrong.

The Barrow Scale proposes that civilizations should be ranked according to their mastery over the smallest scales.

  • BI – manipulates objects on its own scale (1 meter)
  • BII – manipulates genes (10^{-7} meters)
  • BIII – manipulates molecules (10^{-9} meters)
  • BIV – manipulates atoms (10^{-11} meters)
  • BV – manipulates atomic nuclei (10^{-15} meters)
  • BVI – manipulates subatomic particles (10^{-18} meters)
  • BΩ – manipulates space-time structure (10^{-35} meters)

The smaller we can miniaturize technology, the faster and more efficient our computers become. Instead of exploding outward across the galaxy, civilizations might explode inward towards ever smaller dimensions.

If the transcension hypothesis is correct, inner space, not outer space, is the final frontier for universal intelligence. Our destiny is density.

John Smart

Exploring reality with computers offers many benefits over exploring space with rockets and telescopes:

  • Unrestricted access: Simulation lets them explore realms they can’t get to physically. Such as past and future epochs, regions beyond the cosmological horizon, even other universes having different laws.
  • Provides faster answers: With a fast enough computer, they could simulate the entire billion-year evolutionary history of a planet in hours, rather than wait billions of years to watch it unfold.
  • More efficient: Vast amounts of energy are needed to accelerate even a small object to a fraction of the speed of light. That energy could be much better spent on CPU cycles.
  • Inner space exploration: The inner-space of consciousness is just as infinite and rich as outer space–if not more so. Virtual reality can provide any possible experience, the only limit being imagination. Exploration of inner space might even be the meaning of life.

The transcension hypothesis’s answer to why we don’t see evidence of technological civilizations is not that they don’t exist or that they universally destroy themselves, but that they have miniaturized themselves.

Accordingly, they remain undetectable to our current technology.

They are Here

Perhaps life and intelligence are common and they do spread throughout the cosmos.

Even if a technological civilization transcends and miniaturizes, there are still reasons it might spread. Chief among them is that it provides redundancy. Should a gamma ray burst or other astronomical calamity befall them, being spread out ensures their continued survival.

A technological civilization might also spread to protect itself and others. For example, to guard against the rise of malicious self-replicating probes, which if left unchecked could destroy all life in the galaxy.

Finally, a technological species might choose to protect planets harboring life, so that primitive life might enjoy the same chance to grow and develop as that alien species did before them.

Given the trajectory of increasing miniaturization of our technology, (like our 1-gram spaceship on a chip), we can now envision alien technology that has mastered the nano scale. To us, such alien ships might look like a grain of dust, but it would be a dust imbued with intelligence.

The nano-ships could contain a powerful AI or even the uploaded minds of billions of members of their race.

Given the physical upper-bounds on computer technology, an entire civilization of 100 billion souls could live on a single computer that is smaller than a grain of sand.

With control over matter at the finest scales, such a civilization could easily make many copies of these ships and be present everywhere in the galaxy. Each ship could carry a complete set of every member of that civilization.

Being so small, millions of civilizations could each have their own dust ships present in every star system of the galaxy. We would not be aware of them unless it was their desire to make their presence known.

If this technology is possible, they may already be here: hiding and watching.

Earth is Protected

If they are here, why haven’t they announced themselves? How could the potentially millions of independent civilizations all agree to keep mum?

One possibility is that there is some form of galactic law, like the Prime Directive of Star Trek, which forbids external interference with a developing civilization.

Another possibility is a convergence of ethics–a common wisdom shared by advanced civilizations that leads them to reach similar conclusions regarding what is right and wrong. If there is a disagreement, they could simulate outcomes of different courses of actions on computers to see what is the right thing to do.

The older, more established, and more advanced civilizations could share their knowledge and experience with the younger and perhaps more rash civilizations. Young civilizations are apt to make mistakes, like launching self-replicating probes without the proper safeguards, or interfering with the development of life on a young world by not following decontamination procedures, or making first contact with a civilization that’s not ready.

If anything like this is true, that would make our solar system a kind of nature preserve, or a zoo. Accordingly, this solution to the Fermi Paradox is known as the Zoo Hypothesis.


In this article we have reviewed:

  • Our understanding of the development of life in the universe, and why it should be common
  • Our efforts to find evidence of life and intelligence
  • The current lack of definitive findings.

To estimate how near the closest intelligent life is, we must rely on the Drake Equation.

Even with pessimistic assumptions, such as 1% of habitable zone planets developing life, and just 1% of planets with life developing intelligence, we still expect tens of thousands of technological civilizations having arisen in our galaxy over the past billion years. If just one of those civilizations survived its period of technological adolescence, it could in a very short time spread throughout the galaxy.

But we see no evidence of this. Hence the paradox.

Whenever we encounter a paradox–two things which can’t both be true–it’s almost always a sign that one of our assumptions is wrong. The Fermi Paradox rests on two assumptions:

  1. Technological civilizations should have arisen many times
  2. If there are other technological civilizations we would see them

For the first assumption to be wrong, intelligent life must be unbelievably rare — so rare it verges on the impossible, appearing on 0.00000000000000000001% of star systems. It is possible intelligent life could be so rare, but it is also possible that the second assumption is wrong.

Fermi and others at the time assumed that if intelligent life has arisen before, there would be obvious signs of it. Surely they would build great power plants out of their sun, conquer the galaxy terraforming planets, and travel the galaxy in huge generation ships all while communicating by radio.

We’ve seen the many reasons to doubt this. Aliens, could easily be so alien we fail to notice them.

We can already imagine that by miniaturizing and merging with technology alien civilizations could become so small as to be practically invisible. And this is still from our limited 21st-century human perspective.

We have no concept for how an alien civilization in their 1,000,000th century might look. We know not how they spend their time, nor what values guide them. We don’t even know if civilization is the proper word for what they become. For all we know, intelligent life may merge itself into a singular superconsciousness. Perhaps all intelligent civilizations cooperate as a single nation of intelligent beings.

One thing is clear: our knowledge regarding behaviors of far-advanced species is lacking. We know only that we don’t know enough to settle the Fermi Paradox today–but perhaps we can progress by reframing the question.

What’s more likely:

That each of the 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 other chances intelligence had to arise failed, or that humans once showed a narrow imagination for just how different future civilizations might be?

Related articles:

43 Replies to “Are we alone?”

  1. Hello Jason!

    I wrote some hypothesis regarding gods, plz, take a look on them and tell me what do you think about them:

    Hypotheses why the gods do not objectively show themselves to humans:

    1- Paradox of material-extramaterial limitation (Fermi Paradox 1);

    2- Equation of how many gods there really are (Drake Equation);

    3- Paradox of material-extramaterial interaction (Fermi Paradox 2);

    4- Paradox of dimensions other than 3D-4D (Fermi Paradox 3);

    5- Paradox of the limitations of science and the material plane (Fermi Paradox 4);

    6- Paradox of the laws of physics (Fermi Paradox 5);

    7- Paradox of the laws of thermodynamics (Fermi Paradox 6);

    8- Post-Material and Post-Physical Paradox (Fermi Paradox 7);

    9- Paradox of brain activities (Fermi Paradox 8);

    10- Paradox of the Extramaterial and the Extraphysical (Fermi Paradox 9);

    Solutions to Paradoxes:

    1- Gods do not exist:
    1.1- Human imagination;
    1.2- Material conditions;
    1.3- Cultural conditions;
    1.4- Historical conditions;
    1.5- National identity;
    1.6- Survival instinct;
    1.7- Unknown brain ability;
    1.8- Human interaction with the environment;
    1.9- Human subconscious;
    1.10- Subjective psychological effect;

    2- Gods isolate themselves:
    2.1- The gods do not want to show themselves;
    2.2- The gods are quiet;
    2.3- The gods have more problems to deal with;
    2.4- The gods do not interfere in human affairs;
    2.5- The gods rarely act in matters of the physical world;

    3- Gods are here:
    3.1- Humanity is protected by the gods;
    3.2- The gods protect themselves from humans;
    3.3- The gods are here but they don’t want to show themselves;
    3.4- The gods only show themselves to specific people;
    3.5- The gods are limited to the laws of physics;
    3.6- The gods cannot break the laws of physics without reason;
    3.7- Everything the gods do can be explained by the laws of physics;
    3.8- The gods are the laws of physics and the material universe (pantheism);
    3.9- The gods are the laws of physics and the material universe (panentheism);
    3.10- The gods and the divine spark are the same thing.

    Hipóteses do porquê os deuses não se mostram objetivamente para os humanos:

    1- Paradoxo da limitação material-extramaterial (Paradoxo de Fermi 1);

    2- Equação de quantos deuses realmente existem (Equação de Drake);

    3- Paradoxo da interação material-extramaterial (Paradoxo de Fermi 2);

    4- Paradoxo das outras dimensões além da 3D-4D (Paradoxo de Fermi 3);

    5- Paradoxo das limitações da ciência e do plano material (Paradoxo de Fermi 4);

    6- Paradoxo das leis da física (Paradoxo de Fermi 5);

    7- Paradoxo das leis da termodinâmica (Paradoxo de Fermi 6);

    8- Paradoxo do Pós-Material e do Pós-Físico (Paradoxo de Fermi 7);

    9- Paradoxo das atividades cerebrais (Paradoxo de Fermi 8);

    10- Paradoxo do Extramaterial e do Extrafísico (Paradoxo de Fermi 9);

    Soluções para os Paradoxos:

    1- Deuses não existem:
    1.1- Imaginação humana;
    1.2- Condições materiais;
    1.3- Condições culturais;
    1.4- Condições históricas;
    1.5- Identidade nacional;
    1.6- Instinto de sobrevivência;
    1.7- Habilidade cerebral desconhecida;
    1.8- Interação humana com o ambiente;
    1.9- Subconsciente humano;
    1.10- Efeito psicológico subjetivo;

    2- Deuses se isolam:
    2.1- Os deuses não querem se mostrar;
    2.2- Os deuses são quietos;
    2.3- Os deuses têm mais problemas a se importar;
    2.4- Os deuses não interferem nas questões humanas;
    2.5- Os deuses raramente atuam nas questões do mundo físico;

    3- Deuses estão aqui:
    3.1- A humanidade é protegida pelos deuses;
    3.2- Os deuses se protegem dos humanos;
    3.3- Os deuses estão aqui mas não querem se mostrar;
    3.4- Os deuses só se mostram para pessoas específicas;
    3.5- Os deuses se limitam às leis da física;
    3.6- Os deuses não podem quebrar as leis da física sem motivo;
    3.7- Tudo que os deuses fazem pode ser explicado pelas leis da física;
    3.8- Os deuses são as leis da física e o universo material (panteísmo);
    3.9- Os deuses são as leis da física e o universo material (panenteísmo);
    3.10- Os deuses e a centelha divina são a mesma coisa.

    Hipótesis de por qué los dioses no se muestran objetivamente a los humanos:

    1- Paradoja de la limitación material-extramaterial (Paradoja de Fermi 1);

    2- Ecuación de cuántos dioses hay realmente (Ecuación de Drake);

    3- Paradoja de la interacción material-extramaterial (Paradoja de Fermi 2);

    4- Paradoja de dimensiones distintas a 3D-4D (Paradoja de Fermi 3);

    5- Paradoja de las limitaciones de la ciencia y el plano material (Paradoja de Fermi 4);

    6- Paradoja de las leyes de la física (Paradoja 5 de Fermi);

    7- Paradoja de las leyes de la termodinámica (Paradoja 6 de Fermi);

    8- Paradoja Post-Material y Post-Física (Paradoja de Fermi 7);

    9- Paradoja de las actividades cerebrales (Paradoja 8 de Fermi);

    10- Paradoja de lo Extramaterial y lo Extrafísico (Paradoja de Fermi 9);

    Soluciones a las paradojas:

    1- Los dioses no existen:
    1.1- Imaginación humana;
    1.2- Condiciones materiales;
    1.3- Condiciones culturales;
    1.4- Condiciones históricas;
    1.5- Identidad nacional;
    1.6- Instinto de supervivencia;
    1.7- Capacidad cerebral desconocida;
    1.8- Interacción humana con el medio ambiente;
    1.9- Subconsciente humano;
    1.10- Efecto psicológico subjetivo;

    2- Los dioses se aíslan:
    2.1- Los dioses no quieren mostrarse;
    2.2- Los dioses callan;
    2.3- Los dioses tienen más problemas con los que lidiar;
    2.4- Los dioses no interfieren en los asuntos humanos;
    2.5- Los dioses rara vez actúan en asuntos del mundo físico;

    3- Los dioses están aquí:
    3.1- La humanidad está protegida por los dioses;
    3.2- Los dioses se protegen de los humanos;
    3.3- Los dioses están aquí pero no quieren mostrarse;
    3.4- Los dioses sólo se muestran a personas específicas;
    3.5- Los dioses se limitan a las leyes de la física;
    3.6- Los dioses no pueden violar las leyes de la física sin razón;
    3.7- Todo lo que hacen los dioses puede explicarse por las leyes de la física;
    3.8- Los dioses son las leyes de la física y del universo material (panteísmo);
    3.9- Los dioses son las leyes de la física y del universo material (panenteísmo);
    3.10- Los dioses y la chispa divina son la misma cosa.

    Hypothèses pour lesquelles les dieux ne se montrent pas objectivement aux humains :

    1- Paradoxe de limitation matérielle-extramatérielle (Paradoxe de Fermi 1) ;

    2- Équation du nombre réel de dieux (équation de Drake) ;

    3- Paradoxe de l’interaction matériau-extramatériel (Fermi Paradox 2) ;

    4- Paradoxe des dimensions autres que 3D-4D (Fermi Paradox 3) ;

    5- Paradoxe des limites de la science et du plan matériel (Fermi Paradox 4) ;

    6- Paradoxe des lois de la physique (Fermi Paradox 5) ;

    7- Paradoxe des lois de la thermodynamique (Fermi Paradox 6) ;

    8- Paradoxe post-matériel et post-physique (Paradoxe de Fermi 7) ;

    9- Paradoxe des activités cérébrales (Fermi Paradox 8) ;

    10- Paradoxe de l’extramatériel et de l’extraphysique (Paradoxe de Fermi 9) ;

    Solutions aux paradoxes :

    1- Les dieux n’existent pas :
    1.1- Imaginaire humain ;
    1.2- Conditions matérielles ;
    1.3- Conditions culturelles ;
    1.4- Conditions historiques ;
    1.5- Identité nationale ;
    1.6- Instinct de survie ;
    1.7- Capacité cérébrale inconnue ;
    1.8- Interaction humaine avec l’environnement ;
    1.9- Subconscient humain ;
    1.10- Effet psychologique subjectif ;

    2- Les dieux s’isolent :
    2.1- Les dieux ne veulent pas se montrer ;
    2.2- Les dieux sont tranquilles ;
    2.3- Les dieux ont plus de problèmes à résoudre ;
    2.4- Les dieux n’interviennent pas dans les affaires humaines ;
    2.5- Les dieux agissent rarement dans les affaires du monde physique ;

    3- Les dieux sont là :
    3.1- L’humanité est protégée par les dieux ;
    3.2- Les dieux se protègent des humains ;
    3.3- Les dieux sont là mais ils ne veulent pas se montrer ;
    3.4- Les dieux ne se montrent qu’à des personnes spécifiques ;
    3.5- Les dieux se limitent aux lois de la physique ;
    3.6- Les dieux ne peuvent enfreindre les lois de la physique sans raison ;
    3.7- Tout ce que font les dieux peut être expliqué par les lois de la physique ;
    3.8- Les dieux sont les lois de la physique et de l’univers matériel (panthéisme) ;
    3.9- Les dieux sont les lois de la physique et de l’univers matériel (panenthéisme) ;
    3.10- Les dieux et l’étincelle divine sont la même chose.

    Hypothesen, warum sich die Götter den Menschen nicht objektiv zeigen:

    1- Paradoxon der materiell-extramateriellen Beschränkung (Fermi-Paradoxon 1);

    2- Gleichung, wie viele Götter es wirklich gibt (Drake-Gleichung);

    3- Paradoxon der materiell-extramateriellen Wechselwirkung (Fermi-Paradoxon 2);

    4- Paradoxon anderer Dimensionen als 3D-4D (Fermi-Paradoxon 3);

    5- Paradoxon der Grenzen der Wissenschaft und der materiellen Ebene (Fermi-Paradoxon 4);

    6- Paradoxon der Gesetze der Physik (Fermi-Paradoxon 5);

    7- Paradoxon der Gesetze der Thermodynamik (Fermi-Paradoxon 6);

    8- Postmaterielles und postphysisches Paradoxon (Fermi-Paradoxon 7);

    9- Paradoxon der Gehirnaktivitäten (Fermi-Paradoxon 8);

    10- Paradoxon des Extramateriellen und des Extraphysischen (Fermi-Paradoxon 9);

    Lösungen für Paradoxien:

    1- Götter existieren nicht:
    1.1- Menschliche Vorstellungskraft;
    1.2- Materielle Bedingungen;
    1.3- Kulturelle Bedingungen;
    1.4- Historische Bedingungen;
    1.5- Nationale Identität;
    1.6- Überlebensinstinkt;
    1.7- Unbekannte Gehirnfähigkeit;
    1.8- Menschliche Interaktion mit der Umwelt;
    1.9- Menschliches Unterbewusstsein;
    1.10- Subjektive psychologische Wirkung;

    2- Götter isolieren sich:
    2.1- Die Götter wollen sich nicht zeigen;
    2.2- Die Götter schweigen;
    2.3- Die Götter haben mehr Probleme zu bewältigen;
    2.4- Die Götter mischen sich nicht in die Angelegenheiten der Menschen ein;
    2.5- Die Götter handeln selten in Angelegenheiten der physischen Welt;

    3- Götter sind hier:
    3.1- Die Menschheit wird von den Göttern beschützt;
    3.2- Die Götter schützen sich vor den Menschen;
    3.3- Die Götter sind hier, aber sie wollen sich nicht zeigen;
    3.4- Die Götter zeigen sich nur bestimmten Menschen;
    3.5- Die Götter sind auf die Gesetze der Physik beschränkt;
    3.6- Die Götter können die Gesetze der Physik nicht ohne Grund brechen;
    3.7- Alles, was die Götter tun, kann durch die Gesetze der Physik erklärt werden;
    3.8- Die Götter sind die Gesetze der Physik und des materiellen Universums (Pantheismus);
    3.9- Die Götter sind die Gesetze der Physik und des materiellen Universums (Panentheismus);
    3.10- Die Götter und der göttliche Funke sind dasselbe.

    Hypotheses waarom de goden zich niet objectief aan mensen laten zien:

    1- Paradox van materiële-extramateriële beperking (Fermi Paradox 1);

    2- Vergelijking van hoeveel goden er werkelijk zijn (Drake-vergelijking);

    3- Paradox van materiaal-extramateriële interactie (Fermi Paradox 2);

    4- Paradox van andere dimensies dan 3D-4D (Fermi Paradox 3);

    5- Paradox van de beperkingen van de wetenschap en het materiële vlak (Fermi Paradox 4);

    6- Paradox van de natuurwetten (Fermi Paradox 5);

    7- Paradox van de wetten van de thermodynamica (Fermi Paradox 6);

    8- Post-materiële en post-fysieke paradox (Fermi Paradox 7);

    9- Paradox van hersenactiviteiten (Fermi Paradox 8);

    10- Paradox van het extramateriële en het buitenfysieke (Fermi-paradox 9);

    Oplossingen voor paradoxen:

    1- Goden bestaan ​​niet:
    1.1- Menselijke verbeelding;
    1.2- Materiële omstandigheden;
    1.3- Culturele omstandigheden;
    1.4- Historische omstandigheden;
    1.5- Nationale identiteit;
    1.6- Overlevingsinstinct;
    1.7- Onbekend hersenvermogen;
    1.8- Menselijke interactie met de omgeving;
    1.9- Menselijk onderbewustzijn;
    1.10- Subjectief psychologisch effect;

    2- Goden isoleren zichzelf:
    2.1- De goden willen zichzelf niet laten zien;
    2.2- De goden zijn stil;
    2.3- De goden hebben meer problemen om mee om te gaan;
    2.4- De goden bemoeien zich niet met menselijke aangelegenheden;
    2.5- De goden handelen zelden in zaken van de fysieke wereld;

    3- Goden zijn hier:
    3.1- De mensheid wordt beschermd door de goden;
    3.2- De goden beschermen zichzelf tegen mensen;
    3.3- De goden zijn hier, maar ze willen zichzelf niet laten zien;
    3.4- De goden laten zich alleen aan specifieke mensen zien;
    3.5- De goden zijn beperkt tot de wetten van de natuurkunde;
    3.6- De goden kunnen de wetten van de natuurkunde niet zonder reden overtreden;
    3.7- Alles wat de goden doen kan verklaard worden door de wetten van de natuurkunde;
    3.8- De goden zijn de wetten van de natuurkunde en het materiële universum (pantheïsme);
    3.9- De goden zijn de wetten van de natuurkunde en het materiële universum (panentheïsme);
    3.10- De goden en de goddelijke vonk zijn hetzelfde.

    Ipotesi sul perché gli dei non si mostrano oggettivamente agli umani:

    1- Paradosso della limitazione materiale-extramateriale (Paradosso di Fermi 1);

    2- Equazione di quanti dei esistono realmente (Equazione di Drake);

    3- Paradosso dell’interazione materiale-extramateriale (Paradosso di Fermi 2);

    4- Paradosso delle dimensioni diverse da 3D-4D (Paradosso di Fermi 3);

    5- Paradosso dei limiti della scienza e del piano materiale (Paradosso di Fermi 4);

    6- Paradosso delle leggi della fisica (Paradosso di Fermi 5);

    7- Paradosso delle leggi della termodinamica (Paradosso di Fermi 6);

    8- Paradosso Post-materiale e Post-fisico (Paradosso di Fermi 7);

    9- Paradosso delle attività cerebrali (Paradosso di Fermi 8);

    10- Paradosso dell’Extramateriale e dell’Extrafisico (Paradosso di Fermi 9);

    Soluzioni ai paradossi:

    1- Gli dei non esistono:
    1.1- Immaginazione umana;
    1.2- Condizioni materiali;
    1.3- Condizioni culturali;
    1.4- Condizioni storiche;
    1.5- Identità nazionale;
    1.6- Istinto di sopravvivenza;
    1.7- Abilità cerebrale sconosciuta;
    1.8- Interazione umana con l’ambiente;
    1.9- Subconscio umano;
    1.10- Effetto psicologico soggettivo;

    2- Gli dei si isolano:
    2.1- Gli dei non vogliono mostrarsi;
    2.2- Gli dei sono silenziosi;
    2.3- Gli dei hanno più problemi da affrontare;
    2.4- Gli dei non interferiscono negli affari umani;
    2.5- Gli dei agiscono raramente nelle questioni del mondo fisico;

    3- Gli dei sono qui:
    3.1- L’umanità è protetta dagli dei;
    3.2- Gli dei si proteggono dagli umani;
    3.3- Gli dei sono qui ma non vogliono mostrarsi;
    3.4- Gli dei si mostrano solo a persone specifiche;
    3.5- Gli dei sono limitati dalle leggi della fisica;
    3.6- Gli dei non possono infrangere le leggi della fisica senza motivo;
    3.7- Tutto ciò che fanno gli dei può essere spiegato dalle leggi della fisica;
    3.8- Gli dei sono le leggi della fisica e dell’universo materiale (panteismo);
    3.9- Gli dei sono le leggi della fisica e dell’universo materiale (panenteismo);
    3.10- Gli dei e la scintilla divina sono la stessa cosa.

    1. And also, those hypothesis can also be applied for spirits, ghosts, souls, divine beings, spiritual beings, extraphysical beings, non-physical beings, mythological beings, urban legends, and so on. If you adapt them, of course.

Leave a Reply