Is there life after death?


Is there an afterlife or is this the only life we get? Most believe science says there is no afterlife. But this view, while common, is wrong.

It required thousands of years of careful study of the natural world. Today, modern science offers answers to this age-old mystery.

Humanity has long sought answers to the question of immortality. Image Credit: Steve Evans
Humanity has long sought answers to the question of immortality. Image Credit: Steve Evans

Contrary to popular wisdom, the existence of an afterlife is an inescapable conclusion of many of today’s scientific theories.

In this article, we will review 10 scientific theories that predict an afterlife. These theories come from diverse fields of science.

They include cornerstone theories of physics such as quantum mechanics and special relativity, as well as theories fundamental to the fields of cosmology, biology, neuroscience, and technology.

We will review these theories and see what they imply for the afterlife.

You will see why rational, evidence-based, scientists were brought to the conclusion that there is life after death. By the end of this article, you will share in their understanding. You will know what we can expect of the afterlife if our modern scientific theories are true.

Testable and untestable predictions

In science, theories often make predictions that can’t be tested. For example, the theory for why stars shine predicts that right now a photon is leaving from the far side of the sun.

We can never test this prediction.

Light leaving the far side of the sun can never be proven to exist by anyone on Earth.
A photon now leaving from the far side of the sun cannot ever be proven to exist by anyone on Earth.

This photon is moving away from us at the speed of light. We can never catch up to it. Absent the existence of a mirror in the right place at the right time to reflect it back, this photon will remain forever beyond our light cone and therefore inaccessible to us.

Nonetheless the existence of this photon is a prediction that follows from an established theory. Accordingly, our confidence in this photon’s existence remains as high as our confidence in that theory.

Therefore a scientist who believes in the theory will believe in the existence of this photon — despite our total inability to ever see it.

Theories usually make many predictions (represented by arrows). Some predictions are testable. Others are not. Generally only a small subset of a theory's testable predictions are ever tested.
Theories usually make many predictions (represented by arrows). Some predictions are testable. Others are not. Generally only a small subset of a theory’s testable predictions are ever tested.

Some predictions of a theory are testable, others aren’t. Though we can’t test all predictions of a theory, our confidence in a theory increases as we test and confirm more of a theory’s predictions.

Each successful test builds our confidence in that theory.

As that confidence grows, so too does our confidence in all the predictions of that theory. This includes predictions we haven’t yet tested, as well as the predictions which aren’t testable.

Each time we drop something and see it fall we perform another test of the theory of gravity. This theory predicts a 1-ton diamond would fall if dropped. Though we have never encountered a 1-ton diamond to test this prediction, we are confident in the theory of gravity. Therefore we are confident that 1-ton diamonds fall when dropped. We can be very confident in untested predictions.

This is the situation for afterlife predictions. Predictions of an afterlife represent the untestable predictions of otherwise testable theories.

Theories predicting life after death

Short of dying and experiencing the afterlife for yourself, science has no way to directly test the existence or absence of an afterlife.

Nonetheless, just as gravity predicts 1-ton diamonds to fall, several theories in science tell us that life continues after death.

The existence of an afterlife, though untestable, is a prediction of well-tested, well-established, and well-accepted theories.

Accordingly, our confidence in the existence of afterlife should be as high as our confidence in the theories predicting it.

Theories and predictions

The following are some of the theories predicting an afterlife.

These are not obscure theories, but theories taken seriously and used by working scientists in their fields. Some of these theories even rank among the most strongly confirmed theories in all of science.

TheoryPrediction for Afterlife
1. Cosmic inflationYou will live again.
2. MechanismYou will reincarnate.
3. Concordance modelYou have infinite incarnations.
4. Quantum mechanicsYou are subjectively immortal.
5. Special relativityYou have an eternal existence.
6. Biological immortalityYou can be made immortal.
7. Simulation hypothesisYou are already immortal.
8. Technological singularityYou will be resurrected.
9. Transcension hypothesisYou are part of a God-like mind.
10. Open individualismYou live wherever there is life.

For there to be no afterlife, all of these theories must be wrong. If just one of these theories is right, then this life will not be your last.

Let’s review each of these theories in detail. We will see what each theory is about, what it explains, who originated it, why scientists believe it, and what it can tell us about the life after this one.

1. Cosmic Inflation and the Afterlife

Afterlife Prediction: You will live again.

Cosmic inflation is a theory in cosmology that fills gaps in our understanding of the big bang.

It was independently conceived by Alexei Starobinsky in 1979 and Alan Guth in 1980, with early kinks being worked out in the following years by Andrei Linde, Paul Steinhardt and Andy Albrecht.

It explains why space is so big, why the universe was so hot and dense in its early history, and why space is still expanding. Today inflation is a well-supported theory having direct observational evidence.

Inflation is now considered part of the standard description of the origins of the universe, as depicted in this diagram by NASA.
Inflation is now considered part of the standard description of the origins of the universe, as depicted in this diagram by NASA.

Cosmic inflation makes a prediction that, so far, remains untested: the process that caused our big bang never stopped, and it will continue creating new ones for all time. This idea is known as eternal inflation.

A diagram of eternal inflation. Image Credit: Alan Guth
A diagram of eternal inflation. Image Credit: Alan Guth

Eternal inflation leads to a multiverse — a reality populated by an infinite number of big bangs, with new big bangs occurring forever.

This consequence is acknowledged by the originators of the theory:

Most important of all is the simple statement that once inflation happens, it produces not just one universe, but an infinite number of universes.

Alan Guth, in “Eternal inflation and its implications

Every experiment that brings better credence to inflationary theory brings us much closer to hints that the multiverse is real.

Andrei Linde

If this idea is right, if the multiverse of eternal inflation is real, then it has profound implications for the afterlife.

Cosmic inflation’s predictions for the afterlife

If eternal inflation is right, then our big bang is just one among an infinite succession of big bangs. Given that, even rare happenings, such as the entire history of life on Earth, is bound to repeat.

It will repeat not just once or twice, but an infinite number of times. These other lives you will live will occur in another place and time, very far away, and possibly very far in the future, but they will happen.

In an eternally inflating universe, anything that can happen will happen; in fact, it will happen an infinite number of times.

Alan Guth, in “Eternal inflation and its implications

Describing inflation, Alan Guth once said “the universe may be the ultimate free lunch.” Linde added to this:

The inflationary universe is not just the ultimate free lunch, it’s the only lunch where all possible dishes are served

Andrei Linde

Every possible history of Earth, from large changes, where say, mammals never evolved, down to the smallest, such as a different choice for dinner, happen in the immensity of eternal inflation.

So you will not only relive your life exactly as you have thus far, but in the infinitude of possibility, you will experience every variation.

That life where you took the other job, moved to the other city, where you went out to eat instead of staying in two nights ago. All of them happen, have happened, and will happen again.

The Ouroboros, is an ancient symbol for eternal cycles of birth, life, death, and rebirth. Cosmic inflation implies our universe, and those in it, are subject to a similar cycle.
The Ouroboros, is an ancient symbol for eternal cycles of birth, life, death, and rebirth. Cosmic inflation implies our universe, and those in it, are subject to a similar cycle.

The idea of a cyclic reality is ancient. It’s been described in the writings of ancient Egyptians an d Mayans, by early Indian and Greek philosophers, even in the old testament of Abrahamic religions:

What has happened before will happen again. What has been done before will be done again. There is nothing new in the whole world.

“Look,” they say, “here is something new!” But no, it has all happened before, long before we were born.

Ecclesiastes 1:9-10 (c. 450–200 B.C.)

According to eternal inflation, after you die you will be born again. You will live again. It may take a 1,000 years, or 100 trillion. But on the timescales of eternity the time it requires is unimportant. What’s important is that it’s inevitable.

We can’t test this afterlife, but we can and have tested cosmic inflation.

So if cosmic inflation is true, you will live again. In fact, under cosmic inflation, you are destined to live an infinite number of times.

(For more on inflation, see: “What caused the big bang?“)

2. Mechanism and the Afterlife

Afterlife Prediction: You will reincarnate.

Mechanism took root in the 1600s, as the laws of motion were worked out. The basic idea: the body is a machine, operating according to mechanical principles and following physical laws.

René Descartes originated mechanism in his 1633 Treatise of Man. In the 20th century, the invention of the computer revived theory. After Alan Turing invented the computer in 1936, he was among the first to speculate on the question of whether machines could think.

Today, mechanism is assumed in all fields of science, from physics and chemistry to biology and neuroscience. Mechanism is perhaps our most strongly confirmed of theories, as no violation of the laws of motion has ever been observed. Moreover, mechanism is confirmed by advances such as brain implants, artificial limbs and sense organs.

José Delgado, implants, and electromagnetic mind control
José Manuel Rodríguez Delgado‘s experiments with brain implants showed he could make animals mate, fall asleep, fight, or stop moving at the literal press of a button.

Mechanism predicts that the motion of everything, including animals and humans, can be described by simple mechanical laws. Since bodily motions are controlled by thoughts, then according to mechanism, the inner workings of our mind must also be mechanical.

Drawing by René Descartes in "Treatise of Man" (1633). Descartes viewed the bodies of animals and humans as sophisticated machines.
Drawing by René Descartes in “Treatise of Man” (1633). Descartes viewed the bodies of animals and humans as sophisticated machines.

This implies that consciousness itself is the result of the mechanical operation of a machine, in our case, the machinery of the brain. Today this view is known variously as functionalism or computationalism.

I should like you to consider that these functions (including passion, memory, and imagination) follow from the mere arrangement of the machine’s organs every bit as naturally as the movements of a clock or other automaton follow from the arrangement of its counter-weights and wheels.

René Descartes, Treatise on Man, published in 1633

I propose to consider the question, ‘Can machines think?’
[…] If we wish to find such similarities we should look rather for mathematical analogies of function.

Alan Turing in “Computing Machinery and Intelligence” (1950)

In 1950, Turing envisioned a future where manmade thinking machines could do anything a human could do, writing, “We may hope that machines will eventually compete with men in all purely intellectual fields.” (See: “When will AI take over?“)

The theory that the brain is a machine seems innocuous. Yet it leads to a radical prediction. It predicts the possibility of reincarnation — that is, a mind surviving and continuing through another’s body.

Mechanism’s predictions for the afterlife

If mechanism is right, then we can rebuild or replace any part of the brain. So long as the new part is functionally equivalent, the overall function and behavior of the machine is preserved.

So what is this mind of ours: what are these atoms with consciousness? Last week’s potatoes! That is what now can remember what was going on in my mind a year ago—a  mind which has long ago been replaced. This is what it means when one discovers how long it takes for the atoms of the brain to be replaced by other atoms, to note that the thing which I call my individuality is only a pattern or dance. The atoms come into my brain, dance a dance, then go out; always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday.

Richard Feynman in “What do you care what other people think?” (1988)

Mechanism even predicts that in principle, we could scan a person at an atomic scale and, using advanced technology, rebuild that same person at another location from a different pile of atoms.

If mechanism is true, teletransporters could become a convenient form of transportation.
If mechanism is true, teletransporters could become a convenient form of transportation.

So long as the patterns of a mind are restored, the person survives. It would not matter if the original atoms or new atoms are used. The recreated person is physically and mechanically identical. No physical test could distinguish them for identical atoms are indistinguishable.

According to mechanism, we can survive the death, destruction, and even complete annihilation of our bodies. As we can be restored to life wherever and whenever the pattern of our mind is reformed.

This led to the idea, much later popular among analytic philosophers of mind, that the mental is a set of functions that operate through the body. Such an approach supports the idea that there is a place for the self within nature, that a self — even one that exists over time in different bodies — need be not a supernatural phenomenon.

Jonardon Ganeri, Professor of Philosophy

Thus mechanism implies the possibility of reincarnation. But how likely is it that an identical mind and body will be recreated elsewhere?

Your brain is incredibly complex, and is not apt to spontaneously appear out of nowhere. But your brain did not start this way. It began as a single cell. It arose from a state of zero-complexity — containing no information — to become what it is now.

A brain that is dying eventually reaches this same state of zero-complexity. In the course of its decline it can intersect and become identical with the state of a developing brain. It would have the same mechanical processes, patterns of behavior, and information content.

As a dying organism (in blue) declines and its brain complexity approaches zero. This state intersects with the state of a developing organism (in red). The result is a teletransportation: the brain dies in one location and is recreated in another location, with different material.
A dying organism (in blue) declines and its brain complexity approaches zero. This state intersects with the state of a developing organism (in red). The result is a teletransportation: the brain dies in one location and is recreated in another location, with different material.

The mind and person, could thereby survive the death of their body.

When the body dies, the ‘mechanism’ of the body, holding the spirit is gone and the spirit finds a new body sooner or later, perhaps immediately.

Alan Turing

We could become senile and become identical to a younger person (probably a baby at sleep) and that way evade death.

Saibal Mitra, Physicist

The mechanistic view that there is no soul, only matter following fixed mechanical rules, implies the possibility of reincarnation.

The soul is thereby recovered: as something distinct from any particular physical body which can transcend the death of the body.

There’s only one way to be conscious of nothing. We might call this blank state the primordial state of being. It is the state we were in before we were born, and the state we return to after we die.

Try and imagine what it will be like to go to sleep and never wake up. Think about that. Children think about that.

It’s one of the great wonders of life.
What will it be like to go to sleep and never wake up?

And if you think long enough about that, something will happen. You will find out, among other things, that it will pose the next question to you. What was it like to wake up after having never gone to sleep? That was when you were born.

Alan Watts

This primordial state is the state from which all minds emerge, and to which all beings return. Under mechanism, the existence of this singular state guarantees reincarnation as another being.

Of course, this prediction of mechanism is untestable. Traveling through a low complexity state, as a senile or dying brain requires we lose all, or nearly all information about the previous life.

Accordingly, there’s no way to tell whether a newborn’s conscious mind is a continuation of some previous being’s consciousness.

The Buddhist "Wheel of Life" depicts the perpetual cycle of reincarnation called saṃsāra.
The Buddhist “Wheel of Life” depicts the perpetual cycle of reincarnation called saṃsāra.

The idea of reincarnation appears across cultures and times.

It was expressed by ancient Greeks and Romans. It is found in the Kabbalah of Jewish mysticism as well as in Druid and Taoist philosophies. It is a tenet of many eastern religions, including Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, and Sikhism.

Just as the embodied soul continuously passes from childhood to youth to old age, similarly, at the time of death, the soul passes into another body. The wise are not deluded by this.

Bhagavad Gita verse 2:13 (c. 200 B.C.)

The difference between death and birth is only a thought-moment: the last thought-moment in this life conditions the first thought-moment in the so-called next life, which, in fact, is the continuity of the same series.

Walpola Rahula, Buddhist scholar and monk in “What the Buddha Taught” (1959)

According to mechanism, the experience at death is something akin to reincarnation. We won’t necessarily live as ourselves over and over again as cosmic inflation predicts. Instead we can survive as other beings, some not necessarily human, in this world or others.

So if mechanism is true, you will live again. You will survive death by reincarnating to experience the life of another being.

(For more on mechanism, see: “Can a machine be conscious?“)

3. The Concordance Model and the Afterlife

Afterlife Prediction: You have infinite incarnations.

The concordance model, also known as the Lambda-Cold Dark Matter or (ΛCDM) model, is the most widely accepted cosmological model. It is therefore called the standard model of cosmology.

One assumption of this model is that the shape of the universe is flat. In other words, space has zero curvature. According to our best astronomical measurements the curvature of space \Omega_{K} = 0.000^{+0.005}_{-0.005} — so as best we can tell, it is zero.

Three possibilities exist: (1) space is positively curved, (2) space is negatively curved, or (3) space is flat.
Three possibilities exist: (1) space is positively curved, (2) space is negatively curved, or (3) space is flat.

But there is a surprising consequence of flat space: it implies space is infinite. Not just infinite empty space, but infinite and filled with infinite stuff: infinite galaxies, infinite stars, and infinite worlds.

The curvature of a sphere determines the sphere's size.
The curvature of a sphere determines the sphere’s size.

The curvature of space is the 3-d equivalent of the 2-d curvature of a sphere’s surface. The surface of a small sphere, like a marble or ping pong ball is highly curved, it is easy for us to tell it is round.

But the larger the sphere, the flatter its surface becomes. A basketball or beach ball is less curved than a marble. As spheres grow to the size of planets, the surface starts to look flat.

Now imagine the sphere kept growing, until it was infinite in size. At that point it’s curvature would be zero. It’s surface would be perfectly flat! The same is true of the curvature of space. If space is flat then space is infinite.

Measurements of temperature and polarization anisotropy in the cosmic microwave background (CMB) have played a major role in establishing and sharpening the standard “ΛCDM” model of cosmology: a six-parameter model based on a flat universe, dominated by a cosmological constant, Λ, and cold-dark-matter (CDM), with initial Gaussian, adiabatic fluctuations seeded by inflation.

Nine-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations

They say that the curvature of the Universe is tightly constrained around 0. In other words, the most likely model is that the Universe is flat. A flat Universe would also be infinite and their calculations are consistent with this too.

MIT Technology Review

But even the idea that the universe is infinite leads to bizarre and unintuitive consequences for the afterlife.

The concordance model’s predictions for the afterlife

If the concordance model is correct and space goes on forever, then it is not just space that is infinite, you become infinite.

Does space go on forever? If it does, the implications for the afterlife are extraordinary.
Does space go on forever? If it does, the implications for the afterlife are extraordinary.

Within infinite space exist infinite occurrences of the Milky Way Galaxy, infinite occurrences of our solar system, infinite occurrences of Earth, and even infinite occurrences of you, exactly as you are now.

The idea of such an alter ego seems strange and implausible, but it looks as if we will just have to live with it, because it is supported by astronomical observations. The simplest and most popular cosmological model today predicts that you have a twin in a galaxy about 10 to the 10^{28} meters from here. This distance is so large that it is beyond astronomical, but that does not make your doppelgänger any less real.

The estimate is derived from elementary probability and does not even assume speculative modern physics, merely that space is infinite (or at least sufficiently large) in size and almost uniformly filled with matter, as observations indicate. In infinite space, even the most unlikely events must take place somewhere.

Max Tegmark, Cosmologist at MIT

Infinite space implies you have infinite bodies throughout the universe. We each have unlimited physical incarnations.

If some misfortune were to kill you here and now, say a meteorite crashing down on you, you would nevertheless survive.

You would survive through the lives of your other exact duplicates on distant Earths, otherwise identical except there, no meteorite fell. Since you can’t experience those Earths where you die, you only experience those parts of the universe where you survive.

The implication: You can’t be killed, at least not everywhere. There will always be another version of you elsewhere who lives on. Perhaps one who experiences a miraculous cure, or other happenstance of fate.

So while a doctor who examines a body can determine that body to be dead, no doctor can prove a person to be dead — not without proving that person has no other incarnations surviving elsewhere in reality.

The sound Om (or Aum) represents Brahman, the infinite reality:
"Om. That (Brahman) is infinite, and this (universe) is infinite. The infinite proceeds from the infinite." – Paingala Upanishad (c. 600 A.D.)
The sound Om (or Aum) represents Brahman, the infinite reality:
“Om. That (Brahman) is infinite, and this (universe) is infinite. The infinite proceeds from the infinite.” — Paingala Upanishad (c. 600 A.D.)

Whether or not the universe is infinite is an age-old question. It dates back at least 2,600 years with the Greek idea of the apeiron.

Some 2,300 years ago, the Greek philosopher Epicurus argued for the principle of plenitude — the idea that given infinite space and matter, there ought to be infinite worlds: some like ours, others different.

Furthermore, there are infinite worlds both like and unlike this world of ours. For the atoms being infinite in number, as was proved already, are borne on far out into space. For those atoms, which are of such nature that a world could be created out of them or made by them, have not been used up either on one world or on a limited number of worlds, nor again on all the worlds which are alike, or on those which are different from these. So that there nowhere exists an obstacle to the infinite number of the worlds.

Epicurus in “Letter to Herodotus” (c. 300 B.C.)

The idea of an infinite universe also appears in religious texts. It’s found in the Indian religions of Hinduism, Buddhism, and Jainism. And in the Chinese philosophies of Confucianism and Taoism.

In Abrahamic religions, the idea appears in Gnosticism, Bahái Faith, Mormonism, and in the writings of Christian and Islamic theologians.

It is established by evidence that there exists beyond the world a void without a terminal limit, and it is established as well by evidence that God Most High has power over all contingent beings. Therefore He the Most High has the power to create a thousand thousand worlds beyond this world…”

Fakhr al-Din al-Razi, 12th-century Islamic theologian

Know thou of a truth that the worlds of God are countless in their number, and infinite in their range. None can reckon or comprehend them except God, the All-Knowing, the All-Wise.

Baháʼu’lláh, founder of Bahái Faith, in “Tablet of Vafá”

According to the concordance model, there are infinite worlds. Some like this one, others different. Therefore, should you die here, your life nevertheless continues elsewhere, right where it left off.

So if the concordance model is true, you have infinite incarnations. Accordingly, from your own point of view, you survive any peril.

(For more on the concordance model, see: “Does space go on forever?” and “How big is the universe?“)

4. Quantum Mechanics and the Afterlife

Afterlife Prediction: You are subjectively immortal.

Quantum mechanics started as a theory of quanta (light particles), but later it was realized its rules apply to all particle types.

For the previous century evidence favored the idea that light is a wave. New findings at the turn of the 20th-century brought this into doubt:

All three results suggested that light was made of particles, not waves.

If light is a wave, it should bend around corners, just as sound waves do. It does.
If light is a particle, it should be emitted and absorbed in bundles of energy. It is.
If light is a wave, it should bend around corners, just as sound waves do. It does.
If light is a particle, it should be emitted and absorbed in bundles of energy. It is.

It took nearly two decades for physicists to reconcile this.

In 1925, Werner HeisenbergMax Born, and Pascual Jordan developed a theory based on matrices. Later that year, Erwin Schrödinger developed an alternate formula based on a wave equation.

Heisenberg’s and Schrödinger’s approaches gave the same answers. Later John von Neumann proved the two formulas were equivalent.

We now have an answer to the question of is light a particle or a wave:

Light is made of particles, but the probable locations of these particles is governed by an equation similar to those describing waves.

Today, quantum mechanics is thoroughly confirmed. It is responsible for the most accurate prediction in all of physics and is the basis of numerous technologies, including lasers, transistors, and LEDs.

We couldn’t have high-speed fiber optic networks, DVDs, flash memory, microprocessors, or flat screen displays without these.

But there is a disturbing consequence to the equations of quantum mechanics: particles can be in multiple locations at once!

Quantum computers speed up computations by exploiting the fact that particles can simultaneously be in multiple states at once. Image Credit: IBM Research
Quantum computers speed up computations by exploiting the fact that particles can simultaneously be in multiple states at once. Image Credit: IBM Research

Schrödinger was the first to realize his equation, interpreted literally, predicts an infinite number of unseen universes, where every experimental possibility is realized: a quantum multiverse.

But he never published this idea. He mentioned it in a 1952 lecture, where he warned that what he was about to say might “seem lunatic.”

His lunatic idea: when the Schrödinger equation seems to describe several different histories they are “not alternatives but all really happen simultaneously.”

Here was an eminent physicist joking that he might be considered mad. Why? For claiming that his own equation — the very one for which we had won the Nobel prize — might be true.

David Deutsch, inventor of the quantum computer, in “The Beginning of Infinity

The idea was not published until five years later. A graduate student at Princeton, Hugh Everett III, independently reached the same conclusion. He published it as his 1957 doctoral thesis.

[The universal wave function] must contain amplitudes for all possible worlds depending on all quantum-mechanical possibilities in the past and thus one is forced to believe in the equal reality of an infinity of possible worlds.

Richard Feynman, who won the 1965 Nobel Prize in Physics for Quantum Electrodynamics

In 1981, Richard Feynman was the first to have the idea of a quantum computer — a computer that exploits the resources in parallel universes to speed up calculations. In 1984, the physicist David Deutsch showed how to build one. Deutsch believes quantum computers can provide near-irrefutable evidence of many-worlds.

David Deutsch Explains Quantum Computers
Deutsch explains how a table top quantum computer could exhibit more computing power than a computer made from all the matter in the observable universe.
(See “How do quantum computers really work?“)

Since the Universe as we see it lacks the computational resources to do the calculations, where are they being done? It can only be in other universes. Quantum computers share information with huge numbers of versions of themselves throughout the multiverse.

David Deutsch

Quantum computers are now a reality. You can sign up for free to run your own programs on quantum computers. That quantum computers exist forces us to confront the existence of alternate universes.

If this prediction of multiple parallel histories is true, then we live in a reality where anything that can happen, does happen.

This not only affects life as we know it, but also the afterlife.

Quantum mechanics’s predictions for the afterlife

Quantum mechanics implies the existence of unlimited alternate histories and universes. Within these universes are unlimited alternate versions of us, each living out every permutation of every possibility.

One implication of this idea is a form of immortality.

Hugh Everett, who originated the many-worlds idea, was the first to introduce the concept of quantum immortality — the idea that because we only perceive branches of the Schrödinger equation where we survive, it is impossible to die from one’s own point of view.

In a discussion with his employee Keith Lynch, also a trained physicist, Lynch recounts that Everett raised the question of whether it made sense for a believer in many-worlds to play high-stakes Russian Roulette as, in some universe, a version of you is bound to win.

Everett firmly believed that his many-worlds theory guaranteed him immortality: His consciousness, he argued, is bound at each branching to follow whatever path does not lead to death — and so on ad infinitum.

Keith Lynch

In the 1980s, others realized this implication of quantum mechanics:

For an example to illustrate this lack of uniqueness we might return to the [double slit] experiment and suppose the right-hand detector is attached to a gun which shoots, and kills, me if it records a particle. Then after one particle had passed through the experiment, the wave function would contain a piece with me alive and a piece with me dead.

One ‘I’ would certainly be alive, so we appear to have a sort of Russian roulette, in which we cannot really lose! Indeed, since all ‘aging’ or ‘decaying’ processes are presumably quantum mechanical in nature, there is always a small part of the wave function in which they will not have occurred. Thus to be completely fanciful, immortality is guaranteed – I will always be alive in the only part of the wavefunction of which I am aware!

Euan J. Squires in “The Mystery of the Quantum World” (1986)

The concept was independently described by roboticist Hans Moravec in his 1987 book Mind Children, and also by the logician Bruno Marchal in his 1988 paper Informatique théorique et philosophie de l’esprit.

We can only experience the branches where we survive. Accordingly, everyone is subjectively — from their viewpoint — immortal.

Whenever, in some particular history, your life ends, there is always some other history in the multiverse, where your life continues.

In our branch, Hugh Everett died in 1982 at age 51. But if his thesis is right, there are other branches where he is alive to this day. Even unlikely events, such as quantum tunneling to a younger age, will for some of our lucky selves, forestall the decline of old age.

Everett’s daughter, Liz Everett, took her life in 1996. In her note she expressed hope of meeting her father in a parallel universe. It is especially tragic when a young person dies. There is so much unrealized potential, so many experiences never had.

Under quantum mechanics that potential is not unrealized; only realized elsewhere in reality — in other histories of the multiverse.

Mahā-Viṣṇu sleeping in the Causal Ocean emanating millions of universes with each breath. "Even though over a period of time I might count all the atoms of the universe, I could not count all of My opulences which I manifest within innumerable universes." – Bhagavata Purana 11.16.39. Image Credit: Krishna.com
Mahā-Viṣṇu sleeping in the Causal Ocean emanating millions of universes with each breath. “Even though over a period of time I might count all the atoms of the universe, I could not count all of My opulences which I manifest within innumerable universes.” — Bhagavata Purana 11.16.39. Image Credit: Krishna.com

The idea of an infinite reality, filled with infinite universes can be found in many religions.

There are innumerable universes besides this one, and although they are unlimitedly large, they move about like atoms in You.

Bhagavata Purana 6.16.37 (c. 800 – 1,000 A.D.)

God has the power to fill the vacuum with an infinite number of universes.

Fakhr al-Din al-Razi in “Matalib volume 5” (c. 1200 A.D.)

If the quantum multiverse is real, then we never experience death.

Further, one’s life is not constrained to a single path. Rather, each life branches out to explore every possibility.

We experience all of them — every “road not taken.”

If quantum mechanics is true, there are branches of history in which you were never born. Or died at a younger age. But despite the opinions of people in those branches, you are here, alive and well.

Those who have died from our perspective feel the same — from the position of whichever branches they survive in.

If quantum mechanics is true, you are subjectively immortal. Accordingly, from your own point of view, you will live forever.

(For more on quantum mechanics, see: “Does everything that can happen, actually happen?“)

5. Special Relativity and the Afterlife

Afterlife Prediction: You have an eternal existence.

Special relativity redefined our ideas of space and time. Both become merged into a unified four-dimensional whole called spacetime.

Albert Einstein developed special relativity in 1905, his miracle year. As incredible as its predictions were, every time a prediction of relativity has been tested, it has been proven right.

Special relativity overturned an idea espoused by Newton, and believed since the time of Euclid who established geometry in 300 B.C.: the idea that time and space are absolutes.

If time were absolute then everyone should agree on the order of events and what exists and happens in the present moment of time. Absolute time also implies time flows at the same rate for everyone.

According to relativity, observers travelling at different velocities will disagree on the ordering of events (A, B, and C). Image Credit: Wikimedia
According to relativity, observers travelling at different velocities will disagree on the ordering of events (A, B, and C). Image Credit: Wikimedia

Relativity forced us to dispense with all these ideas. The rate time flows, the order of events, and the content of the present are not absolute, but relative. Different observers can disagree.

Are two events (e.g. the two strokes of lightning A and B) which are simultaneous with reference to the railway embankment also simultaneous relatively to the train? We shall show directly that the answer must be in the negative.

Albert Einstein in “Relativity: The Special and the General Theory” (1916)

The only way to reconcile their different viewpoints is through a four-dimensional reality where time and change are illusions. Asking “what event happens first?” is like asking “what seed comes first in an apple?”

Here we see the same apple, sliced at two different angles. The direction we choose to slice through the apple determines the order the seeds are encountered.
Here we see the same apple, sliced at two different angles. The direction we choose to slice through the apple determines the order the seeds are encountered.

Events are embedded in spacetime like seeds are embedded in apples. There is no absolute ordering to the seeds. The order you encounter them depends on the angle you choose to slice through the apple.

One of the first to notice this implication of special relativity was Einstein’s teacher Hermann Minkowski. Since then, Einstein and other physicists have adopted it. It is now a standard view among physicists.

The views of space and time which I wish to lay before you have sprung from the soil of experimental physics, and therein lies their strength. They are radical. Henceforth space by itself, and time by itself, are doomed to fade away into mere shadows, and only a kind of union of the two will preserve an independent reality.

Einstein’s professor Hermann Minkowski, in Space and Time (1909)

It appears therefore more natural to think of physical reality as a four dimensional existence, instead of, as hitherto, the evolution of a three dimensional existence.

Albert Einstein in “Relativity: The Special and General Theory” 15th edition (1952)

Should special relativity be correct, it has implications for the afterlife.

Special relativity’s predictions for the afterlife

In four-dimensional spacetime, change — as a future coming into being and then disappearing into a non-existent past — doesn’t happen.

According to relativity, the word “now” becomes like the word “here”. Neither word reflects a property of the universe, but instead reflects a property of the person speaking it.

Just as we envision all of space as really being out there, as really existing, we should also envision all of time as really being out there, as really existing too.

The physicist Briane Greene in “The Elegant Universe” (1999)

So if the four-dimensionalism of special relativity is true, then we are eternal beings. We live forever across all times spanning our existence.

Of course, man is four-dimensional, just like all other organisms and objects. This mere situation implies that there is a life after death, namely, that part of the four-dimensional human being that exists after the moment of his death.

C.W. Rietdijk in “Four-dimensional reality continued” (2018)

On March 15, 1955, Michele Besso, a dear friend to Einstein, died. Einstein wrote a letter of condolence to Besso’s widow.

Now he has again preceded me a little in parting from this strange world. This has no importance. For people like us who believe in physics, the separation between past, present and future has only the importance of an admittedly tenacious illusion.

Albert Einstein, in a letter to Besso’s family (1955)

Relativity tells us we must dispense with the idea that time flows or that there’s an objective present. In this revised view, Julius Caesar is alive — he’s just in a location 2,000 light years away in spacetime.

From Caesar’s viewpoint, the present is a little before 0 A.D. and none of us are yet born. Our opinion that he is long dead doesn’t bother him — no more than the opinions of people born in 4000 A.D. bother us.

It’s also no coincidence the present year happens to be a time during your life, rather than a billion years in the past or future. You will always find yourself at a point in time where you exist.

Horus holds an ankh to Ramses II. The ankh, called the cross of life, is a 5,000 year old symbol of eternal life. Coptic Christians adopted it as a symbol of the promise of everlasting life.
Horus holds an ankh to Ramses II. The ankh, called the cross of life, is a 5,000 year old symbol of eternal life. Coptic Christians adopted it as a symbol of the promise of everlasting life.

Some 2,500 years ago, the Greek philosopher Parmenides argued that existence is timeless and any appearance of change is an illusion.

what is, is uncreated and indestructible, alone, complete, immovable and without end.

Parmenides in “The Way of the Truth” (circa 475 B.C.)

We also find the idea of timeless existence within Eastern religions. For example in Hinduism:

The unchanging Om is the All. Its expansion is, what has been, what is, what shall be. And what is beyond the three times, is also Om. For all this is the Eternal; and this Self is the Eternal; and this Self has four aspects.

Mandukya Upanishad (c. 200 A.D.)

Religions that consider God to know the future, or God to be outside of time often describe future events as already existing — at least within the mind of God.

God, owing to His infallible prescience of the future, has appointed and ordained from eternity all events occurring in time, especially those that directly proceed from, or at least are influenced by, man’s free will.

The Catholic Encyclopedia

There exist times long before you were born and times long after you died. But despite the opinions of people in those other times, you are here, alive and well, within the time span of your life.

That is our true nature, as four dimensional beings.

Many religions promise eternal life. If special relativity is true, you already have it. You exist eternally. Your life is yours forever.

(For more on special relativity, see: “What is time?“)

6. Biological Immortality and the Afterlife

Afterlife Prediction: You can be made immortal.

Biological immortality refers to the discovery by biologists that there exist in nature species that not only don’t age, but can live forever.

Gerontologists like Aubrey de Grey, and technologists like Ray Kurzweil, believe the ills of aging are, in principle, curable.

Many organizations are now working on, if not devoted to, a cure for aging. This includes the SENS research foundation, Google-backed Calico, Human Longevity, Harvard’s Paul F. Glenn Center for Biology of Aging Research, UCLA’s Molecular Biology Institute, the American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine, BioViva, Turn Biotechnologies, Unity Biotechnology, The Methuselah Foundation, and Age X.

"In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes." — Ben Franklin
“In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes.” — Ben Franklin

Perhaps aging and death are not inevitable. According to the current understanding, aging is wear and tear manifest at the cellular level.

Between 1955 and 1982 science went from almost no understanding of aging to having what is now considered a complete picture:

The seven forms of age-related damage.
The seven forms of age-related damage.

No new forms of age-related damage have been discovered since 1982. Aubrey de Gray outlined Strategies for Engineered Negligible Senescence (SENS), techniques that if mastered, could reverse age-related damage.

In 2005, MIT challenged molecular biologists to find any flaw in SENS, and offered a $20,000 prize to whomever made the best argument. Despite that, it was the opinion of the judges that “no submission met the criterion of the challenge and disproved SENS.”

There is nothing in biology yet found that indicates the inevitability of death. This suggests to me that it is not at all inevitable, and that it is only a matter of time before the biologists discover what it is that is causing us the trouble and that that terrible universal disease or temporariness of the human’s body will be cured.

Richard Feynman, “The Pleasure of Finding Things Out” (1999)

We will transcend death and that natural cycle. We’re not just grapes on the vine—we are overcoming that natural process that we emerged from. Yes, we came from nature, but we are going to surpass it through the power of our technology, which comes from our mind made manifest in the real world.

Ray Kurzweil

Should a cure for aging be found in your lifetime, it has major consequences for the afterlife. For what is an afterlife if you never die?

Biological immortality’s predictions for the afterlife

If biological immortality is right, then our lives could theoretically be extended to thousands, millions, perhaps even billions of years. We could then experience thousands or millions of human lifetimes.

In 1900, life expectancy in the U.S. was 47 years. By 2000 it had risen to 75 years — an increase of 28 years over a century, or 3 months every year. Should future technology enable life expectancy to grow by 12 months per year, then humanity will achieve technological immortality.

We’ve been expanding our life expectancy for thousands of years. So it was 19 thousands of years ago, 37 in 1800. We’re gonna get to a point, 10 to 15 years from now, where we’re adding more time than is going by, to our remaining life expectancy.

Ray Kurzweil author of “Fantastic Voyage: Live Long Enough to Live Forever

Aubrey de Gray has coined this concept: longevity escape velocity. He believes the first person to live to 1,000 is already alive on this planet.

I think the first person to live to 1,000 might be 60 already.

Aubrey de Grey in 2004 (Were you younger than 60 in 2004?)

Though we don’t possess technological immortality today, you might be young enough to live to that future where we do.

The Fountain of Youth, 1546 painting by Lucas Cranach the Elder.
The Fountain of Youth, 1546 painting by Lucas Cranach the Elder.

The 3,500 year old Rigveda, of the Hindu tradition, describes a drink of the Gods called amrita. It confers to its drinkers immortality.

The Book of Genesis, compiled 2,600 years ago, describes a tree called the tree of life in the Garden of Eden. Eating from this tree provided eternal youth and immortality for those in the garden.

Around 200 B.C., China’s first emperor, Qin Shi Huang, sent 1,000 people in search of the elixir of life — none returned.

Every culture has a name for it: amrita, soma, ambrosia, nectar of the gods, tree of life, elixir of life, philosopher’s stone, fountain of youth. All represent the same dream: escaping the fate of old-age and death.

Modern medicine is on the verge of finding a real fountain of youth.

Scientists have used gene manipulation to program creatures to live 10 times longer, they have tested drug cocktails that reverse aging in humans, and discovered how to reset cells to more youthful stages.

The implication is if you can live long enough, you can be made immortal. You could live foreveror at least — as long as you want.

(For more on biological immortality, see: “Can aging be cured?“)

7. The Simulation Hypothesis and the Afterlife

Afterlife Prediction: You are already immortal.

The simulation hypothesis is the idea that what we take to be physical reality is not the true reality, but a computer-generated simulation.

Hans Moravec was the first to propose the idea in 1998. In 2003, Nick Bostrom formalized the theory with his simulation argument.

But it was a new name for an old idea: the dream argument. This is the idea that we cannot tell what is real from what is a dream. The dream argument appears in Socrates’s The Theaetetus in 369 B.C. and in the writings of Zhuang Zhou from around the same time.

In 1849, the poet Edgar Allan Poe asked “Is all that we see or seem
But a dream within a dream?” Today, we teach this lesson to infants. Our nursery rhymes tell them that “life is but a dream.”

Today, modern technology and ideas like virtual reality, computer simulation, video games, and mind uploading, allow us to conceive of scenarios where what we take as real, may in fact, be a sort of dream.

When connected to a virtual reality, the location you seem to inhabit does not exist in the usual physical sense, rather you are in a kind of computer-generated dream.

Hans Moravec in “Pigs in Cyberspace” (1992)
Compare realism of "Wolfenstein 3D" (1992) to "Wolfenstein: The New Order" (2014)
Compare the realism of “Wolfenstein 3D” (1992) to “Wolfenstein: The New Order” (2014)

In a few decades, computer games have transformed from flat and pixelated to immersive photo-realistic 3-dimensional worlds. How realistic might video games of the coming decades and centuries be?

Might they be so realistic that we could be in one and not realize it?

With full sensory integration, you could experience any taste or smell, ache or pain, sight or sound. You could feel balance and touch, even hunger. With memory integration, you could be made to believe you were someone else, or temporarily forget who you really are.

In "The Matrix" what people took for reality was a simulation created by their AI masters.
In “The Matrix” what people took for reality was a simulation created by their AI masters.

The idea has captured our fascination in fiction. There is the play Life is a Dream from 1636, the book Simulacron-3 from 1964, and the movies The Matrix and The Thirteenth Floor from 1999.

But could such works of fictions become a reality? A more pressing question, how do we know we’re not already in some kind of Matrix?

After all, we’ve already put simpler creatures in one.

In 2016 researchers at the OpenWorm Foundation uploaded the brains of worms into virtual environments. Project leader Stephen Larson asked, “Is it possible that what we are proposing is to build the world’s first worm Matrix? An environment where a nervous system would not know if it was in the real world or if it was in a virtual world?”

Nick Bostrom’s simulation argument gives us a way to estimate the probability that we are in a simulated reality. It turned the dream argument into a rigorous scientific question we can investigate.

The simulation argument takes the form of a trilemma:

The argument shows that at least one of the following propositions is true: (1) the human species is very likely to go extinct before reaching a “posthuman” stage; (2) any posthuman civilization is extremely unlikely to run a significant number of simulations of their evolutionary history (or variations thereof); (3) we are almost certainly living in a computer simulation.

Nick Bostrom in “Are you living in a computer simulation?” (2003)

When asked whether our reality might be a simulation produced by information entities, the roboticist Hans Moravec answered:

Of course. In fact, the robots will re-create us any number of times, whereas the original version of our world exists, at most, only once. Therefore, statistically speaking, it’s much more likely we’re living in a vast simulation than in the original version.

Hans Moravec in interview for Wired (1995)

According to Bostrom’s argument, should humanity survive to the point where it can run simulations of humans living at earlier points in history, then it is a near certainty that you are in a simulation now.

In that case, you would not be an original human being living at this time in humanity’s development. Instead, you would live in the distant future — a time when humanity has mastered virtual reality and experiences, and perhaps conquered aging, disease, and scarcity.

It’s conceivable that in this time, humanity will have transcended its corporeality. We might live as spiritual beings without physical bodies — as minds that can inhabit any virtual reality of our choosing.

Simulation hypothesis’s predictions for the afterlife

If the simulation hypothesis is right then what you consider to be your life — a life as a physical being in a physical world — may in actuality be a computer-generated dream.

Should you awaken from this dream you will recall your true nature: an immortal being who has lived many lives on many physical worlds. You will also find yourself to be in a familiar place. Perhaps reunited with those you know from this life and others. Beings you have shared countless lives and experiences with, over billions of years.

You will exist in a realm where anything that can be imagined is possible, a place that knows no suffering, disease, hunger or death.

An afterlife in a different simulation or at a different level of reality after death-in-the-simulation would be a real possibility. It is even conceivable that the simulators might reward or punish their simulated creatures based to how they behave, perhaps according to familiar moral or religious norms (a possibility that gains a little bit of credibility from the possibility that the simulators might be the descendants of earlier humans who recognized these norms).

Nick Bostrom in “The Simulation Argument FAQ” (2008)

This is inevitable if the universe is infinite. In that case, every conscious experience has infinite explanations. Among them is the case where your current experience exists within a simulation.

When we die, the rules surely change. As our brains and bodies cease to function in the normal way, it takes greater and greater contrivances and coincidences to explain continuing consciousness by their operation. We lose our ties to physical reality, but, in the space of all possible worlds, that cannot be the end. Our consciousness continues to exist in some of those, and we will always find ourselves in worlds where we exist and never in ones where we don’t. The nature of the next simplest world that can host us, after we abandon physical law, I cannot guess.

Hans Moravec in “Simulation, Consciousness, Existence” (1998)

Accordingly whether you are in a simulation or not, doesn’t matter. For when you die, it will be as if you had always been in a simulation, as your consciousness only continues along those paths where it can.

According to Bostrom, “In a ‘Big World’ cosmology, all possible human observations are in fact made by somebody somewhere.”

Unlike the reincarnation suggested by mechanism where we lose memories of this life, the simulation hypothesis implies a type of resurrection, where memories of this life are preserved. Upon death we will awaken from this dream, and find ourselves as immortal spiritual beings reunited with other spiritual beings.

As we know from experience, if we dream of having a winning lottery ticket, when we awaken we cannot take it with us. All we can take from a dream are the experiences, memories, and lessons we learned in it.

The highest Heaven as illustrated by Gustave Doré for Dante's Divine Comedy
The highest Heaven as illustrated by Gustave Doré for Dante’s Divine Comedy

These ideas are not only ancient, but nearly universal among the world’s religions. We find in them the idea that the world is a dream, that we will return to a plane of existence with memories learned here, and that we can break free from the cycle of reincarnation.

In Zoroastrianism, one of the oldest surviving religions, it is said that one’s urvan (soul) is sent to the mortal world to collect the experiences of life. The Taoist philosopher Zhuang Zhou wrote 2,300 years ago, “someday there will be a great awakening when we know that this is all a great dream.”

We are not human beings having a spiritual experience; we are spiritual beings having a human experience.

Jesuit priest Theillard de Chardin in “The Phenomenon of Man” (1955)

Among Abrahamic religions, Jews call it olam haba (the world to come), Christians call it the Kingdom of God (heaven), Muslims call it Jannah (paradise). All describe a place devoid of suffering, without toil, sickness, or hunger, and inhabited by immortal souls without bodies:

In the world to come there is nothing corporeal, and no material substances; there are only souls of the righteous without bodies.

Jewish philosopher Maimonides (c. 1100 A.D.)

What I am saying, dear brothers and sisters, is that our physical bodies cannot inherit the Kingdom of God. These dying bodies cannot inherit what will last forever.

First Book of “Corinthians 15:51” (c. 50 A.D.)

Within Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, and Sikhism, the ultimate goal of all souls is to break free from the perpetual cycle of reincarnation in the physical world. This cycle is called saṃsāra. To break from this cycle is known as achieving moksha or nirvāṇa.

Such a liberated soul can then be free of the repeated cycle of birth, life, death, and reincarnation, and all the suffering therein.

Make me immortal in that realm where happiness and transports, where Joys and felicities combine, and longing wishes are fulfilled.

RigvedaMandala 9, hymn 113, line 11” (c. 1500 B.C.)

Within Buddhism is the idea of a Pure Land where one is freed from the cycles of rebirth. Once reborn into the pure land one does not fall back into saṃsāra unless one chooses to do so to help other beings.

All the simulation hypothesis requires is our prowess at creating virtual reality to keep improving. Moreover, if reality is big enough, as with eternal inflation, the concordance model, or the quantum multiverse, then it is guaranteed that we are already within a simulation.

There are reasons to believe the ultimate purpose of life is to have experiences. Simulation and virtual reality thereby represent the final goal of technological development. (See: “What is the meaning of life?“)

So if the simulation hypothesis is right, you are already immortal. You will awaken to find yourself as an immortal being who lives in a realm of infinite possibilities where any experience or life is possible.

(For more on the simulation hypothesis, see: “Are we in a computer simulation?“)

8. The Technological Singularity and the Afterlife

Afterlife Prediction: You will be resurrected.

The technological singularity is a theoretical future point that life, technology, and the universe appear to be evolving towards — one of maximum consciousness, creativity, and intelligence.

The idea was first described in the writings of the Jesuit priest Teilhard de Chardin in the 1930s but it was suppressed until after his death in 1955. De Chardin believed the universe is evolving towards a point of maximum consciousness which he called the Omega Point.

In 1956, a similar idea appeared in Isaac Asimov’s The Last Question. Of the 500 books Asimov published, it was his favorite story.

The first discussion of the technological singularity among scientists was a conversation between Stanislaw Ulam and John von Neumann:

One conversation centered on the ever accelerating progress of technology and changes in the mode of human life, which gives the appearance of approaching some essential singularity in the history of the race beyond which human affairs, as we know them, could not continue.

Stanislaw Ulam, in 1958, recounting a conversation with John von Neumann

Technology advances rapidly. For how much longer can this trend continue? Where might we be when it ends?

Computing power grows exponentially. Since 1900 we’ve seen a 10^{18} fold increase in the price-performance of computers. Image Credit: Steve Jurvetson
Computing power grows exponentially. Since 1900 we’ve seen a 10^{18}-fold increase in the price-performance of computers. Image Credit: Steve Jurvetson

It’s not just technology that is changing ever-faster. Even important historical events are happening at an ever accelerating pace.

When Ray Kurzweil plotted major historical events (paradigm shifts) from 15 different lists, it revealed the average time between paradigm shifts to be shrinking towards zero.
Image Credit: Ray Kurzweil
When Ray Kurzweil plotted major historical events (paradigm shifts) from 15 different lists, it revealed the average time between paradigm shifts to be shrinking towards zero.
Image Credit: Ray Kurzweil

Should these trends continue for just a few more decades, we will reach a point where the time between major historical events approaches zero — as if all future progress will happen at once.

Essential historic developments match a binary scale marking exponentially declining temporal intervals, each half the size of the previous one and equal to a power of 2 times a human lifetime. It seems that history itself is about to converge around 2040 in an Omega Point (Teilhard de Chardin, 1916) or Historic Singularity (Stanislaw Ulam, 1958).

Father of modern AI, Jürgen Schmidhuber in “Is History Converging?” (2006)

Evolution moves towards greater complexity, greater elegance, greater knowledge, greater intelligence, greater beauty, greater creativity, and greater levels of subtle attributes such as love. In every monotheistic tradition God is likewise described as all of these qualities, only without limitation: infinite knowledge, infinite intelligence, infinite beauty, infinite creativity, infinite love, and so on. Of course, even the accelerating growth of evolution never achieves an infinite level, but as it explodes exponentially it certainly moves rapidly in that direction. So evolution moves inexorably towards this conception of God, although never quite reaching this ideal.

Futurist and inventor Ray Kurzweil in “The Singularity is Near” (2005)

In the final anthropic principle or if anything like an infinite amount of computation taking place is going to be true, which I think is highly plausible one way or another, then the universe is heading towards something that might be called omniscience.

Physicist David Deutsch in “The anthropic universe” (2006)

If this idea is right, the ultimate end of progress is to reach the limits of knowledge, complexity, and intelligence. Should such a state be reached, by anyone anywhere, there are consequences for the afterlife.

Technological singularity’s predictions for the afterlife

Should a technological singularity occur at any future time, it will possess the power to computationally resurrect anyone from the past.

It can do this by simulating alternate histories, brute forcing possible life forms, or by reconstructing the past by collecting all available records. Once this superintelligence or Omega Point knows your state at the end of your life, it can allow the simulation to keep going. It may provide you with an afterlife, perhaps even one of your choosing.

A superintelligence could also create opportunities for us to vastly increase our own intellectual and emotional capabilities, and it could assist us in creating a highly appealing experiential world in which we could live lives devoted to joyful game-playing, relating to each other, experiencing, personal growth, and to living closer to our ideals.

Nick Bostrom in “Ethical Issues in Advanced AI” (2003)

Frank Tipler describes how this Omega Point could allow the resurrected to interact — united in a kind of virtual heaven.

The body and memory collection could be set in any simulated background environment the Omega Point wished: a simulated world indistinguishable from the long-extinct society and physical universe of the revived dead person; or even a world that never existed, but one as close as logically possible to the ideal fantasy world of the resurrected dead person. Furthermore all possible combinations of resurrected dead can be placed in the same simulation and allowed to interact. For example, the reader could be placed in a simulation with all of his or her ancestors and descendants.

The cosmologist Frank J. Tipler in “The Omega Point as Eshaton” (1989)

Moravec says that future artificial intelligences of overwhelming processing power will be able to reconstruct human society in every detail by tracing atomic events backward in time.

It will cost them very little to preserve us this way. They will, in fact, be able to re-create a model of our entire civilization, with everything and everyone in it, down to the atomic level, simulating our atoms with machinery that’s vastly subatomic.

Hans Moravec in interview for Wired (1995)

Why might an Omega Point bother to do this? Would you do nothing if you were in a position to save billions of lives, and could do so at little cost to yourself?” (See: “Are there universal values?“)

The afterlife predicted by the technological singularity is not unlike the resurrection envisioned by various religions.

Many religions believe that in the future God will bring the dead back to life and provide those resurrected beings an eternal life, living with God and all other resurrected beings.

Salvador Dalí was fascinated by Teilhard de Chardin's Omega Point theory, which partly inspired his 1960 masterpiece "The Ecumenical Council"
Salvador Dalí was fascinated by Teilhard de Chardin’s Omega Point theory, which partly inspired his 1960 masterpiece “The Ecumenical Council

A perfection of the world and resurrection of the dead is an ancient idea. It appears in Zoroastrianism, which is 4,000 years old and in the religion of ancient Greece. It is also found in the eschatologies of Abrahamic religions: Judaism, Christianity, Islam and Baháʼí Faith.

It will happen in a moment, in the blink of an eye, when the last trumpet is blown. For when the trumpet sounds, those who have died will be raised to live forever. And we who are living will also be transformed.

First Book of “Corinthians 15:52” (c. 50 A.D.)

Early Jews and Christians believed that heaven would be a place formed on earth or in the sky, rather than in some alternate plane of existence. God would refashion the world, creating the world to come.

If the technological singularity is right, there will exist a God-like mind with the power of resurrection. Should it exercise this power, you will be resurrected and reunited with others to share in an eternal afterlife.

(For more on the omega point, see: “Does God exist?“)

9. The Transcension Hypothesis and the Afterlife

Afterlife Prediction: You are part of a God-like mind.

The transcension hypothesis is a theory that supposes the reason we haven’t encountered alien civilizations is that they leave our universe.

It was developed in 2011 by John M. Smart and builds off the ideas of John Barrow who in 1998 proposed microdimensional mastery. This is the speculation that advanced technological civilizations pursue ever-finer scales of manipulation of matter, space, and energy.

Building structures at the nano and sub-nano scales not only improves computational speed and data storage densities, but also makes computation more efficient. A computer operating at the ultimate physical limits of speed and memory looks like a black hole.

Black holes are useful. They're the longest-lasting objects in the universe, they are also the ultimate power plants, heat sinks, and computers. They can even act as portals to the future.
Black holes are useful. They’re the longest-lasting objects in the universe, they are also the ultimate power plants, heat sinks, and computers. They can even act as portals to the future.

The transcension hypothesis predicts advanced civilizations enter black holes. They disconnect from our space and time, and in so doing, gain maximum computation for the mass and energy put in.

Why would anyone choose to enter a black hole or cut themselves off from the rest of the universe? What’s there to do inside a black hole?

In a word: everything. The computational resources in a black hole offer knowledge of other universes and realities, insights about alternate histories and timelines, and provide for any imaginable experience.

epic conway's game of life
Computers are telescopes that can peer into other universes. Here we see a sampling of the objects and goings-on within a 2-dimensional universe discovered by John Conway.

Computation is the ultimate tool for explorers. It allows one to explore any possible outer-space via reality simulation and access any possible inner-space (i.e. conscious experience) via brain simulation.

While telescopes only let us see objects of our universe, computers let us peer into other universes. We can see and extract information about objects in other realities. Likewise, other universes that permit construction of computers can peer into our universe and observe us.

Maybe someday, despite current evidence, a means will be devised to peer into adjacent universes, sporting very different laws of nature, and we will see what else is possible. Or perhaps inhabitants of adjacent universes can peer into ours.

Carl Sagan in “Pale Blue Dot” (1994)

Today, we have devised this means. In fact, simulation is now an indispensable tool for today’s cosmologists. It allows them to explore and experiment with alternate universes and cosmic histories.

With the power of modern supercomputers we are now able to replicate cosmic evolution with great precision through simulations. So we are now able to make replicas of the universe in a computer and this is a very powerful tool that cosmologists have developed in order to understand the universe.

Carlos Frenk in “What We Still Don’t Know – Why Are We Here” (2004)

Computer simulation, like a telescope for the mind’s eye, extends mental vision beyond the nearby realm of simple mathematical objects to distant worlds, some as complex as physical reality, potentially full of living beings, warts, minds, and all. Our own world is among this vista of abstractly conceivable ones, defined by the formal relationships we call physical law as any simulation is defined by its internal rules.

Hans Moravec in “Simulation, Consciousness, Existence” (1998)

If the transcension hypothesis is right, advanced civilizations will be drawn to explore the unlimited potentialities of consciousness and possibilities of existence. This creates another possible afterlife.

The transcension hypothesis’s predictions for the afterlife

There are two forms of knowledge:

  1. Third-person knowledge: knowledge that is shareable and communicable — knowledge that can be found in books, or stored as facts. For example, the population of Paris, or the height of Mt. Everest.
  2. First-person knowledge: knowledge that comes from direct experience which cannot be learned any other way — conscious and sensory experiences, emotions, and feelings. This knowledge is not communicable, it must be felt firsthand. For example, the smell of a rose, or the pain of a bee sting.

A transcended civilization might use simulation to learn everything there is to know about the history, evolution, and biochemistry of apple trees, but without creating conscious experiences they would still know very little about what there is to know about apples.

Such a civilization would lack first-person knowledge. They wouldn’t know how an apple tastes to human taste buds, nor how an apple pie baking in the oven smells. They could have all the book knowledge there is, while remaining ignorant of rich conscious experiences.

A civilization or mind interested in knowing everything must pursue not only third-person knowledge, but also first-person knowledge.

This requires that it not only simulate everything, but be everything and try everything. After all, that is also where all the fun is.

A superintelligence operating on a black hole or planet-sized computer could have the mental experiences of every living being that ever lived on an entire planet. According to Bostrom, such a computer “could simulate the entire mental history of humankind by using less than one millionth of its processing power for one second.”

In that microsecond it could live out a billion year saga, seen through the eyes of every person who ever lived, from each generation, tracing progress from the person who invented the wheel to the life of the first person who took the first step on the surface of the moon.

Do we find ourselves in a new body, or no body? It probably depends more on the details of our own consciousness than did the original physical life. Perhaps we are most likely to find ourselves reconstituted in the minds of superintelligent successors, or perhaps in dreamlike worlds (or AI programs) where psychological rather than physical rules dominate.

Hans Moravec in “Simulation, Consciousness, Existence” (1998)

Confession: if I love [computationalism], it is because it entails the existence of many things not “physically present,” notably those incredible deep universal dreamers which keep losing themselves in an incredible labyrinth of partially shareable dreams, meeting ladders and ladders of surprises, self-multiplying and self-fusing, and which are partially terrestrial and partially divine creatures.

The logician Bruno Marchal in discussion list (2011)

If superintelligences exist with the aim of learning all there is to know, this knowledge includes all first-person knowledge (all experiences). Among the set of all experiences, is the experience of what it is like to be you in this exact moment.

Accordingly, if civilizations transcend then your current experience and life can also be explained as the exploration of a transcendent superintelligence, which may exist in this universe, if not another.

Accordingly, when your life is over, you may wake up as a God-like mind, a superintelligence who has lived not only your life but the lives of every being who has ever lived.

The divine play called The Raslila of Krishna. Image Credit: Wikimedia
The divine play called The Raslila of Krishna. Image Credit: Wikimedia

The idea that God knows every being’s perspective can be found in many religions. In several it is stated explicitly.

To the Hindu, for example, God didn’t create the universe, but God became the universe. Then he forgot that he became the universe. Why would God do this? Basically, for entertainment. You create a universe, and that in itself is very exciting. But then what? Should you sit back and watch this universe of yours having all the fun? No, you should have all the fun yourself. To accomplish this, God transformed into the whole universe. God is the Universe, and everything in it. But the universe doesn’t know that because that would ruin the suspense. The universe is God’s great drama, and God is the stage, the actors, and the audience all at once. The title of this epic drama is “The Great Unknown Outcome.” Throw in potent elements like passion, love, hate, good, evil, free will; and who knows what will happen? No one knows, and that is what keeps the universe interesting. But everyone will have a good time. And there is never really any danger, because everyone is really God, and God is really just playing around.

Warren B. Sharpe in “Philosophy For The Serious Heretic” (2002)

Under this view, the world is a play (called lila) and one entity plays the role of every actor. It is you, you are it, and it is everyone.

If God is omniscient then God must know what it is like to be you. How then can we tell whether you are you, or part of God’s perfect knowledge of what it feels like to be you in this moment?

This uncertainty about one’s true identity was pointed out by Zhuang Zhou 2,300 years ago, in his telling of the butterfly dream.

Once, Zhuang Zhou dreamed he was a butterfly, a butterfly flitting and fluttering about, happy with himself and doing as he pleased. He didn’t know that he was Zhuang Zhou.

Suddenly he woke up and there he was, solid and unmistakable Zhuang Zhou. But he didn’t know if he was Zhuang Zhou who had dreamt he was a butterfly, or a butterfly dreaming that he was Zhuang Zhou.

Zhuang Zhou in “Zhuangzi” (c. 300 B.C.)
The Dream Of Life - Alan Watts
“Then you would get more and more adventurous and you would make further and further out gambles as to what you would dream. And finally you would dream where you are now. You would dream the dream of living the life that you are actually living today. That would be within the infinite multiplicity of choices that you would have — of playing that you weren’t God.” — Alan Watts

According to the transcension hypothesis, there exist minds with the experience of billions of lives. There would exist minds that know what it is like to be every creature that’s lived on Earth and minds that know what it’s like to be creatures born to other possible universes.

So if the transcension hypothesis is true, you are part of a God-like mind. When this life ends you can awaken as this being — one in possession of the life memories not only of this life, but the lives of all others.

(For more on the transcension hypothesis, see: “Are we alone?” and “Can life survive the heat death of the universe?“)

10. Open Individualism and the Afterlife

Afterlife Prediction: You live wherever there is life.

Open individualism, like other theories of personal identity, aims to answer the question: “which experiences belong to which persons?”

The theory of open individualism was first proposed in 1990 by Arnold Zuboff, and expanded upon in a 2004 book by Daniel Kolak. But, the idea had adherents among scientists going back decades.

The common-sense view of personal identity is that each person is identified by either the material continuation of some body, or the psychological continuation of some mind. In this way we can say a person at age 80 is ultimately the same person as when they were 10.

The physicist Freeman Dyson at age 10 and 82. What makes these two the same person?
The physicist Freeman Dyson at age 10 and 82. What makes these two the same person?

But this common-sense view breaks down when we consider less common situations. Cases like split-brains, cloning, merging memories, fusing minds, duplication machines, faulty transporters, and amnesia. If we create several identical copies of a person, which does the original become? One of them? All of them? None of them?

These situations reveal that the common-sense view, which Kolak calls closed individualism, leads to inconsistencies and therefore must be false. But if the common-sense view is wrong, what’s the alternative?

According to open individualism: "You possess all conscious life. Whenever in all time and wherever in all the universe (or beyond) any conscious being stands, sits, crawls, jumps, lies, rolls, flies or swims, its experience of doing so is yours and is yours now. You are that being. You are fish and fowl. Deer and hunter. You are saints and sinners." – Arnold Zuboff
According to open individualism: “You possess all conscious life. Whenever in all time and wherever in all the universe (or beyond) any conscious being stands, sits, crawls, jumps, lies, rolls, flies or swims, its experience of doing so is yours and is yours now. You are that being. You are fish and fowl. Deer and hunter. You are saints and sinners.” — Arnold Zuboff

If closed individualism is false, it leads to open individualism. This is the idea that there is only one experiencer to which all experiences belong.

This is also the resolution of the tension between the rival criteria for personal identity, psychological and bodily continuity. As with brain bisection, there is here an embarrassment of riches. Either side of the classic debate has the upper hand when it argues positively that the person could remain the same if its own pet criterion was maintained even if the other was wholly absent. And, indeed, one could easily imagine a person going along into another body with a transfer to that body’s brain of his pattern of memories. And yet one can also easily imagine the person’s continuing in the same body with an experience of amnesia or false memories. It seems that all such content of experience, in different bodies or with differing mental states, could be mine.

Arnold Zuboff in “One Self: The Logic of Experience” (1990)

The traditional, commonsense view that we are each a separate person numerically identical to ourselves over time, i.e., that personal identity is closed under known individuating and identifying borders—what the author calls Closed Individualism—is shown to be incoherent. The demonstration that personal identity is not closed but open points collectively in one of two new directions: either there are no continuously existing, self-identical persons over time in the sense ordinarily understood—the sort of view developed by philosophers as diverse as Buddha, Hume and most recently Derek Parfit, what the author calls Empty Individualism—or else you are everyone, i.e., personal identity is not closed under known individuating and identifying borders, what the author calls Open Individualism.

Daniel Kolak in “I Am You: The Metaphysical Foundations for Global Ethics” (2004)

If there is just one experiencer — a single person who possesses all conscious experience, then it has major implications for the afterlife.

Open individualism’s predictions for the afterlife

What were the preconditions necessary for you to be born, for you to be blessed with life and consciousness? Did it require specific atoms in your first cell, or would any atoms do? Did it require specific genes, or might you still be alive if your eyes were a different color?

Open individualism supposes that there are no necessary preconditions. That regardless of the material, or genes, or even parents, you would be born and you would experience life.

But then it follows from this that you must also experience the lives of every being, born anywhere to any parents. At first, this sounds ridiculous on its face. Surely we would know if we also experienced the lives of others. Wouldn’t we?

Things are not so clear. Even in our own lives we have experiences that we no longer remember. Someone had the vivid experience of eating that breakfast you had 2,471 days ago, an experience you probably can’t recall anything about from your present vantage point. Might it be the same with the experiences of other lives?

Many thinkers have independently come to this view. These include eminent scientists such as a founder of quantum mechanics Erwin Schrödinger, the astronomer who solved the formation of the elements in stars Fred Hoyle, the polymath Freeman Dyson, and Kurt Gödel, considered the greatest logician since Aristotle.

If they’re right, then all conscious life is you. All experiences are yours.

Inconceivable as it seems to ordinary reason, you — and all other conscious beings as such — are all in all. Hence this life of yours which you are living is not merely a piece of the entire existence, but is in a certain sense the whole; only this whole is not so constituted that it can be surveyed in one single glance.

The physicist Erwin Schrödinger in “My View of the World” (1951)

Enlightenment came to me suddenly and unexpectedly one afternoon in March when I was walking up to the school notice board to see whether my name was on the list for tomorrow’s football game. I was not on the list. And in a blinding flash of inner light I saw the answer to both my problems, the problem of war and the problem of injustice. The answer was amazingly simple. I called it Cosmic Unity. Cosmic Unity said: There is only one of us. We are all the same person. I am you and I am Winston Churchill and Hitler and Gandhi and everybody. There is no problem of injustice because your sufferings are also mine. There will be no problem of war as soon as you understand that in killing me you are only killing yourself.

Freeman Dyson in “Disturbing The Universe” (1979)

If open individualism is right, the implications are astounding.

Every building you see, you have lived the lives of everyone who built it. You have lived as all of your ancestors, and all your descendants; as all the rulers of the world, and all the peasants. You are every creature that has swum, crawled, or flown on this planet or any other.

The Egg - A Short Story
Andy Weir’s short story, The Egg teaches a similar lesson

Open individualism teaches us we ought to regard others as self. It thereby provides an ethical framework not unlike teachings found in many religions. We should also be more understanding of others, for not only would we act the same way in their shoes, but we are in fact in their shoes and we did choose to act that way.

"The sum total of all that lives is God. We may not be God, but we are of God, even as a little drop of water is of the ocean." – Mahatma Gandhi
“The sum total of all that lives is God. We may not be God, but we are of God, even as a little drop of water is of the ocean.” — Mahatma Gandhi

The idea that all consciousness is of a single consciousness is ancient. It appears explicitly in the religions of Hinduism and Buddhism.

The karm yogis, who are of purified intellect, and who control the mind and senses, see the Soul of all souls in every living being. 

The Bhagavad Gita chapter 5 verse 7 (c. 200 B.C.)

The root of all things is nothing else but one Self.

Samantabhadra Buddha in the “Kulayarāja Tantra” of Tibetan Buddhism

Based upon the direct experience of those who have fulfilled the necessary conditions of such knowledge, this teaching is expressed most succinctly in the Sanskrit formula, tat tvam asi (‘That art thou‘); the Atman, or immanent eternal Self, is one with Brahman, the Absolute Principle of all existence; and the last end of every human being is to discover the fact for himself, to find out Who he really is.

Aldous Huxley in “The Perennial Philosophy” (1946)

The realization of seeing the self in others, forms the basis of the nearly universal Golden Rule:

That which you hate to be done to you, do not do to another.

Papyrus scrolls found in ancient Egypt (664 – 323 B.C.)

Killing a living being is killing one’s own self; showing compassion to a living being is showing compassion to oneself.

The Saman Suttam verse 151

Love your neighbor as yourself.

Book of Leviticus 19:18

The most righteous person is the one who consents for other people what he consents for himself, and who dislikes for them what he dislikes for himself.

Mohammad in the Hadith

Regard your neighbor’s gain as your own gain, and your neighbor’s loss as your own loss.

The Taoist scripture T’ai Shang Kan Ying P’ien (12th century)

Zuboff concludes in Oneself, “Perhaps the spread of this knowledge among the intelligent beings that are you can help you to stop yourself from hurting yourself because you mistake yourself for another.”

Huxely’s Perennial Philosophy concludes, “The goal of creation is the return of all sentient beings out of separateness and that infatuating urge-to-separateness which results in suffering, through unitive knowledge, into the wholeness of eternal Reality.”

According to open individualism, you cannot die so long as there is life anywhere in reality. For every living being, everywhere, is you.

So if open individualism is true, you live wherever there is life. You are the universal person and the one self of experience.

(For more on open individualism, see: “Why was I born?” and “Is there a universal ethical or moral system?“)

Conclusions

Is there life after death?

It took thousands of years of investigation, but science now offers answers to this age-old question. We find the idea of an afterlife is a scientific idea, because it is a prediction of well-established theories.

We have reviewed 10 scientific theories which count among their predictions the prediction of an existence beyond this life.

Science reveals an afterlife that cycles forever, sees reincarnation through other beings, and has infinite lives throughout an infinite cosmos. It has shown that we are subjectively immortal, eternal, and through technology might live billions of years, and experience countless lives from an immortal plane of virtual reality. We have seen how science predicts that we could be resurrected by a God-like mind, indeed, we may even be part of such a God-like mind now, even if we’re not already the one soul present in all conscious life.

Only in the case that all 10 of these theories are false, are we fated to experience but one brief stint as a mortal human being on earth.

But what if all these theories are true? What would we experience after death when there are so many possibilities? Do we experience reincarnation, or resurrection, do we awaken as a God, or as a worm?

In a sense, we experience them all. One’s consciousness would for a time get lost in a web of dreams, losing itself — perhaps for eons — before finding itself again. Once the consciousness realizes it is God, it dives back in, to dream the great cosmic lotus dream.

There is the deep and appealing notion that the universe is but the dream of the god who after a 100 Brahma years dissolves himself into a dreamless sleep and the universe dissolves with him until after another Brahma century, he stirs, recomposes himself and begins again to dream the great cosmic lotus dream.

Carl Sagan in Cosmos episode 10 “The Edge of Forever” (1980)

In his book “Dreams of a Final Theory“, the physicist Steven Weinberg concludes, “I do not for a minute think that science will ever provide the consolations that have been offered by religion facing death.”

Expressions of scientific atheism have been common among scientists, but in the face of accumulated evidence this view is no longer tenable.

In his book “The Physics of Immortality,” the cosmologist Frank Tippler replied to Weinberg, saying “I disagree. Science can now offer precisely the consolations in facing death that religion once offered.”

It seems Tippler’s view is correct. Starting from well-supported scientific theories, from special relativity, to quantum mechanics, from mechanism to cosmology, from technology trends to theories of personal identity — all these premises, when followed to their logical ends, lead to ideas of an afterlife not unlike what is found in various religions.

If ideas like life after death are amenable to scientific investigation and rational consideration, then perhaps we are witnessing the fall of scientific atheism and the rise of a kind of scientific spiritualism — what Aldous Huxley called autology — the science of the self.

Through these techniques and investigations, we can extend our understanding of and perhaps add to the science of the soul.


Related articles:

332 Replies to “Is there life after death?”

  1. Quem é Demétrius Oliveira de Macedo, advogado que espancou procuradora-geral durante expediente em prefeitura
    Agressor, que também é procurador, era visto como um homem de poucas palavras e ‘antissocial’. Ele trabalhava para o município de Registro, no interior de São Paulo, desde 2011.
    Por g1 Santos

    22/06/2022 17h38 Atualizado há 2 minutos

    Demétrius Oliveira Macedo agrediu colega de trabalho na Prefeitura de Registro, no interior de São Paulo — Foto: Reprodução/Redes Sociais
    Demétrius Oliveira Macedo agrediu colega de trabalho na Prefeitura de Registro, no interior de São Paulo — Foto: Reprodução/Redes Sociais

    O advogado Demétrius Oliveira de Macedo, de 34 anos, que foi filmado espancando a procuradora-geral Gabriela Samadello Monteiro de Barros, de 39, na Prefeitura de Registro, no interior de São Paulo, antes das agressões era visto por quem o cercava como uma pessoa quieta, com perfil “antissocial”, mas por vezes educada.

    Veja, no vídeo abaixo, o momento da agressão

    Vídeo flagra procuradora sendo brutalmente agredida em prefeitura em São Paulo
    Vídeo flagra procuradora sendo brutalmente agredida em prefeitura em São Paulo

    Leia também:
    VÍDEO: procuradora espancada em SP diz que agressor era ‘antissocial’ no ambiente de trabalho
    Procuradora espancada por colega revela que ‘tinha medo’ dele e se diz ‘desrespeitada como mulher’; VÍDEO
    Agressor de procuradora foi suspenso e teve salário cortado
    Formado em Direito, em 2010, pelo Centro Universitário Monte Serrat (Unimonte), hoje Universidade São Judas, em Santos, no litoral de São Paulo, Demétrius passou no exame da Ordem dos Advogados do Brasil (OAB) no ano seguinte, em 2011, tornando-se apto a exercer a profissão. No mesmo ano, começou a carreira na Prefeitura de Registro.

    A procuradora-geral Gabriela conta que o perfil de Demétrius mudou logo após ela ter sido promovida, em 2019. A vítima relata que os dois trabalharam juntos por quase 10 anos e, até 2018, conversavam e saiam com a equipe da procuradoria (veja relato abaixo).

    De lá pra cá, segundo ela, tornou-se “antissocial”. “Não conversava com a gente, não dava ‘bom dia’, não cumprimentava na rua, não era colaborativo, não se integrava no trabalho. Era praticamente impossível um trabalho em grupo com ele”, relatou a vítima.

    ‘Acho que ele é capaz de qualquer coisa’, diz procuradora agredida em SP
    ‘Acho que ele é capaz de qualquer coisa’, diz procuradora agredida em SP

    O personal trainer de uma academia que Demétrius frequentou até 2019, em Registro, preferiu não se identificar, mas contou que o procurador era um “cara de poucas palavras”.

    “Na academia, entrava mudo e saia calado. Às vezes, me cumprimentava, mas não lembro de vê-lo falando com outros colegas”.

    Ela afirma que o contato com o agressor era “superficial” e cordial. “Sempre foi muito educado . Ele costumava me cumprimentar. Às vezes falávamos sobre futebol, mas, no geral, era uma pessoa extremamente quieta”.

    O profissional de Educação Física, porém, se mostrou surpreso quando viu o vídeo das agressões. “Não esperava esse tipo de comportamento dele. O contato superficial que eu tinha jamais demonstrou que ele faria o que fez. Mas um cara muito quieto, muito fechado, sei lá. É muito estranho”.

    Prisão decretada
    A Justiça decretou a prisão preventiva do procurador Demétrius Oliveira de Macedo, que agrediu a procuradora-geral da Prefeitura de Registro, Gabriela Samadello Monteiro de Barros. O pedido foi apresentado na tarde desta quarta-feira (22), na 1ª Vara Criminal da cidade, pelo delegado Daniel Vaz Rocha, que está responsável pelo caso.

    No pedido, o delegado apontou que o acusado “vem tendo sérios problemas de relacionamento com mulheres no ambiente de trabalho, sendo que, em liberdade, expõe a perigo a vida delas, e consequentemente, a ordem pública”.

    “A agressão do procurador de Registro a uma colega não ficará impune. A Polícia Civil acaba de pedir a prisão do agressor Demétrius Macedo. Que a Justiça faça a sua parte e puna todo e qualquer covarde que agrida uma mulher”, disse o governador Rodrigo Garcia (PSDB), que visitou Peruíbe e São Vicente, ambas no litoral de São Paulo, na manhã desta quarta-feira (22).

    Ainda de acordo com a Polícia Civil, a investigação instaurada para apurar o caso reuniu fotos e vídeos da agressão, além de depoimento da procuradora-geral para fundamentar o pedido de prisão preventiva.

    Em liberdade
    Conforme reportado pelo g1, o delegado Fernando Carvalho Gregório, também do 1º Distrito Policial (DP) do município, onde o caso é investigado, alegou que o agressor foi liberado inicialmente por “falta de flagrante”. Macedo recebeu a liberação logo após a elaboração de um boletim de ocorrência (BO) no local.

    O que se sabe sobre a agressão
    1.Quem é a vitima?
    A mulher agredida é Gabriela Samadello Monteiro de Barros, de 39 anos. Ela é procuradora-geral de Registro, no interior de São Paulo, e a procuradora chefe do agressor. Gabriela estava no local de trabalho quando sofreu a agressão.

    2.Quem é o agressor?
    Demétrius Oliveira Macedo, de 34 anos, também é procurador de Registro. O autor das agressões já havia apresentado comportamento suspeito e sido grosseiro com outra funcionária do setor, conforme relatado por Gabriela à polícia civil.

    3.O que motivou a agressão?
    A procuradora havia cobrado providências sobre o episódio de grosseria contra uma funcionária, pois ela estava com medo de trabalhar no mesmo ambiente que Macedo e enviou um memorando à Secretaria Administrativa com uma proposta de procedimento administrativo.

    Na segunda-feira (20), foi publicada no Diário Oficial do município a criação de uma comissão para apurar os fatos. Provavelmente, segundo Gabriela, foi isso que desencadeou as agressões.

    4.Quais os detalhes da agressão?
    O caso aconteceu na tarde de segunda-feira (20), por volta das 16h50, na sala da procuradoria geral do município, dentro da prefeitura. A ação filmada por outra funcionária mostra que Macedo desferiu socos e chutou a colega, que estava trabalhando quando foi surpreendida pelo ataque.

    Segundo consta no Boletim de Ocorrência (BO), ele a agrediu primeiro com uma cotovelada na cabeça e continuou com socos no rosto. A procuradora informou ter tentado se defender e, inclusive, recebeu ajuda de uma funcionária, que foi empurrada contra a porta e bateu as costas na maçaneta.

    Livre para continuar as agressões, Macedo continuou dando socos e chutes, mesmo com outras duas funcionárias tentando contê-lo. Em determinado momento, Gabriela conseguiu ser retirada da frente do agressor.

    Também é possível ouvir no vídeo que ele ofende a procuradora várias vezes. Assim que ouviram os gritos, dois funcionários do setor jurídico foram até o local e conseguiram controlar o procurador.

    5.Quais as declarações da vítima?
    Gabriela afirmou que temia uma revolta de Macedo contra ela. “Eu tinha medo, sim. Tinha medo de que fosse acontecer isso, mas não imaginava que fosse ser uma violência física, achava que fosse um ‘bate boca’, uma discussão”.

    A procuradora também afirmou que se sentiu desrespeitada diante das agressões. “Foi exposta a minha dignidade. Como mulher, fui desrespeitada, assim como servidora pública. Enfim, foi um desrespeito global da minha personalidade como mulher”, desabafou.

    Agora, Gabriela quer que Macedo seja processado em decorrência das agressões e ofensas contra ela.

    6.O que o agressor disse à polícia?
    Demétrius Oliveira Macedo disse à polícia civil que sofria assédio moral no local de trabalho. “Ele admitiu que agrediu a vítima e alegou que assim o fez por sofrer assédio moral”, afirmou Fernando Carvalho Gregório, delegado do 1º Distrito Policial do município, em entrevista à TV Tribuna, afiliada à Rede Globo.

    7.O agressor será preso?
    Agressor da procuradora foi ouvido pela Policia Civil e liberado na sequência, uma vez que o delegado responsável pelo caso considerou não haver flagrante.

    “Eu entendi que não havia uma situação de flagrante, e sim um fato criminoso. É claro que deveria ser devidamente apurado. Por isso, fizemos o registro da ocorrência e tomamos todas as diligências cabíveis na ocasião”, explicou Gregório.

    O delegado também esclareceu que o fato é analisado pelo Ministério Público (MP) e Poder Judiciário (PJ). “Ao final de todos os trabalhos, teremos uma conclusão das investigações num processo, e uma eventual condenação”, ressaltou a autoridade policial, que acrescentou não ser possível antecipar um resultado sem que tenham sido realizadas as devidas investigações.

    8.O agressor será exonerado?
    Como medida imediata para punir a agressão, a prefeitura de Registro publicou no Diário Oficial Nº 1076, a portaria Nº 525/2022, determinando a suspensão preventiva de Macedo.

    Conforme descrito nos atos oficiais, o procurador ficará suspenso por 30 dias, sem receber salário, a contar desde o dia 21 de junho, data da agressão.

    De acordo com a explicação da prefeitura, essa medida faz parte do processo administrativo que deve cominar na exoneração de Macedo. “É necessário seguir essa etapa e os tramites legais para que a decisão seja tomada de maneira consistente”, esclareceu.

    9.O que diz a prefeitura?
    A administração municipal, por meio de nota, manifestou “mais absoluto e profundo repúdio aos brutais atos de violência”.

    “Reafirmamos nosso compromisso com a prevenção e enfrentamento a todas as formas de violência, principalmente aquelas que vitimizam mulheres. Os servidores da Procuradoria Geral Municipal e da Secretaria de Negócios Jurídicos receberão todo apoio necessário, inclusive acompanhamento psicológico”, escreveu.

    A administração municipal disse ainda aos demais servidores: “recebam nosso amparo e saibam que a prática de violência é veementemente repudiada e será severamente punida”.

    10.O que diz a Associação Nacional dos Procuradores Municipais?
    A Associação Nacional dos Procuradores Municipais (ANPM) afirmou em nota que se solidariza com a Procuradora Municipal e repudia a conduta violenta de Macedo.

    “A vítima foi agredida por razões ligadas ao exercício do cargo enquanto o agressor, ao que tudo indica, agiu motivado por um intuito criminoso. A ANPM reafirma seu compromisso de conscientização, prevenção e enfrentamento ao assédio no âmbito da advocacia e a todas as formas de violência praticadas contra a mulher”.

    https://g1.globo.com/sp/santos-regiao/noticia/2022/06/22/quem-e-demetrius-oliveira-de-macedo-advogado-que-espancou-procuradora-geral-durante-expediente-em-prefeitura.ghtml

    Who is Demétrius Oliveira de Macedo, the lawyer who beat the attorney general during office hours in the city hall
    Aggressor, who is also a prosecutor, was seen as a man of few words and ‘antisocial’. He worked for the municipality of Registro, in the interior of São Paulo, since 2011.
    By g1 Santos

    06/22/2022 17:38 Updated 4 minutes ago

    Demétrius Oliveira Macedo assaulted a co-worker at the Municipality of Registro, in the interior of São Paulo – Photo: Reproduction / Social Networks
    Demétrius Oliveira Macedo assaulted a co-worker at the Municipality of Registro, in the interior of São Paulo – Photo: Reproduction / Social Networks

    Lawyer Demétrius Oliveira de Macedo, 34, who was filmed beating attorney general Gabriela Samadello Monteiro de Barros , 39, at City Hall , in the interior of São Paulo, before the attacks, was seen by those around him as a quiet person, with an “antisocial” profile, but sometimes polite.

    Watch the moment of the assault in the video below.

    Video captures prosecutor being brutally assaulted at city hall in São Paulo

    Video captures prosecutor being brutally assaulted at city hall in São Paulo

    Read too:
    VIDEO: Prosecutor beaten in SP says that aggressor was ‘antisocial’ in the work environment
    Prosecutor beaten by colleague reveals that she was ‘afraid’ of him and says she is ‘disrespected as a woman’; VIDEO
    Prosecutor’s aggressor was suspended and had his salary cut
    Graduated in Law in 2010 at Centro Universitário Monte Serrat (Unimonte), today Universidade São Judas, in Santos, on the coast of São Paulo, Demétrius passed the exam of the Brazilian Bar Association (OAB) the following year, in 2011, becoming able to practice the profession. In the same year, he began his career at the Registry Office .

    Attorney General Gabriela says that Demétrius’ profile changed shortly after she was promoted in 2019. The victim reports that the two worked together for almost 10 years and, until 2018, talked and went out with the prosecutor’s team (see report below).

    Since then, according to her, she has become “antisocial”. “He didn’t talk to us, he didn’t say ‘good morning’, he didn’t say hello on the street, he wasn’t collaborative, he didn’t integrate into the work. It was practically impossible to work in a group with him”, said the victim.

    ‘I think he is capable of anything’, says prosecutor assaulted in SP

    ‘I think he is capable of anything’, says prosecutor assaulted in SP

    The personal trainer at a gym that Demétrius attended until 2019, in Registro , preferred not to be identified, but said that the prosecutor was a “guy of few words”.

    “At the gym, he entered silently and left silently. Sometimes he greeted me, but I don’t remember seeing him talking to other colleagues”.

    She claims that contact with the aggressor was “superficial” and cordial. “He was always very polite. He used to greet me. Sometimes we would talk about football, but overall he was an extremely quiet person.”

    The Physical Education professional, however, was surprised when he saw the video of the aggressions. “I didn’t expect that kind of behavior from him. The superficial contact I had never showed that he would do what he did. But a very quiet guy, very closed off, I don’t know. It’s very strange.”

    Imprisonment decreed
    The Justice decreed the preventive detention of the attorney Demétrius Oliveira de Macedo , who attacked the attorney general of the Municipality of Registro , Gabriela Samadello Monteiro de Barros . The request was presented this Wednesday afternoon (22), at the 1st Criminal Court of the city, by delegate Daniel Vaz Rocha, who is responsible for the case.

    In the request, the delegate pointed out that the accused “has been having serious relationship problems with women in the work environment, and, on freedom, he exposes their lives to danger, and consequently, public order” .

    “The aggression of the registry attorney to a colleague will not go unpunished. The Civil Police has just asked for the arrest of the aggressor Demétrius Macedo. May Justice do its part and punish any coward who attacks a woman,” said Governor Rodrigo Garcia (PSDB), who visited Peruíbe and São Vicente, both on the coast of São Paulo, this Wednesday morning (22). ).

    Also according to the Civil Police, the investigation launched to investigate the case gathered photos and videos of the aggression, as well as testimony from the attorney general to support the request for preventive detention.

    In freedom
    As reported by g1 , delegate Fernando Carvalho Gregório, also from the 1st Police District (DP) of the municipality, where the case is investigated, claimed that the aggressor was initially released for “lack of flagrant” . Macedo received the release soon after the preparation of an incident report (BO) at the site.

    What is known about aggression
    1.Who is the victim?
    The woman attacked is Gabriela Samadello Monteiro de Barros, 39 years old. She is the Attorney General of the Registry , in the interior of São Paulo, and the chief prosecutor of the aggressor. Gabriela was at work when she was assaulted.

    2.Who is the aggressor?
    Demétrius Oliveira Macedo, 34, is also a registry attorney . The perpetrator of the attacks had already shown suspicious behavior and was rude to another employee of the sector, as reported by Gabriela to the civil police.

    3.What motivated the aggression?
    The prosecutor had demanded action on the episode of rudeness against an employee, as she was afraid to work in the same environment as Macedo and sent a memorandum to the Administrative Secretariat with a proposal for an administrative procedure.

    On Monday (20), the creation of a commission to investigate the facts was published in the Official Gazette of the municipality. Probably, according to Gabriela, that was what triggered the attacks.

    4.What are the details of the aggression?
    The case took place on Monday afternoon (20), around 4:50 pm, in the city attorney’s office, inside the city hall. The action filmed by another employee shows that Macedo threw punches and kicked her colleague, who was working when she was surprised by the attack.

    According to the police report (BO), he attacked her first with an elbow to the head and continued with punches in the face. The prosecutor said she tried to defend herself and even received help from an employee, who was pushed against the door and hit her back on the handle.

    Free to continue the aggression, Macedo continued punching and kicking, even with two other employees trying to contain him. At one point, Gabriela managed to be removed from the front of the aggressor.

    It is also possible to hear in the video that he offends the prosecutor several times. As soon as they heard the screams, two employees from the legal sector went to the scene and managed to control the prosecutor.

    5.What are the victim’s statements?
    Gabriela stated that she feared Macedo would revolt against her. “I was afraid, yes. I was afraid that this would happen, but I didn’t imagine it would be physical violence, I thought it was a ‘argument’, an argument”.

    The prosecutor also stated that she felt disrespected in the face of the aggressions. “My dignity was exposed. As a woman, I was disrespected, as well as a public servant. Anyway, it was a global disrespect of my personality as a woman,” she vented.

    Now, Gabriela wants Macedo to be prosecuted as a result of the aggressions and offenses against her.

    6.What did the attacker say to the police?
    Demétrius Oliveira Macedo told the civil police that he suffered moral harassment in the workplace. “He admitted that he assaulted the victim and claimed that he did so because he was morally harassed,” said Fernando Carvalho Gregório, delegate of the 1st Police District of the municipality, in an interview with TV Tribuna, affiliated with Rede Globo.

    7. Will the aggressor be arrested?
    The prosecutor’s aggressor was heard by the Civil Police and subsequently released, since the delegate responsible for the case considered that there was no act.

    “I understood that there was not a situation of flagrant, but a criminal fact. Of course, it should be duly investigated. Therefore, we registered the occurrence and took all the necessary steps at the time”, explained Gregório.

    The delegate also clarified that the fact is analyzed by the Public Ministry (MP) and the Judiciary (PJ). “At the end of all the work, we will have a conclusion of the investigations in a case, and an eventual conviction”, stressed the police official, who added that it was not possible to anticipate a result without the proper investigations having been carried out.

    8. Will the aggressor be exonerated?
    As an immediate measure to punish the aggression, the Municipality of Registro published in the Official Gazette No. 1076, the decree No. 525/2022, determining the preventive suspension of Macedo.

    As described in the official acts, the prosecutor will be suspended for 30 days, without receiving a salary, starting on June 21, the date of the assault.

    According to the city hall’s explanation, this measure is part of the administrative process that should end in Macedo’s dismissal. “It is necessary to follow this step and the legal procedures so that the decision is taken consistently”, he clarified.

    9.What does the city say?
    The municipal administration, through a note, expressed “the most absolute and profound repudiation of brutal acts of violence”.

    “We reaffirm our commitment to the prevention and confrontation of all forms of violence, especially those that victimize women. The servers of the Municipal Attorney General’s Office and the Department of Legal Affairs will receive all necessary support, including psychological monitoring”, he wrote.

    The municipal administration also told the other servers: “receive our support and know that the practice of violence is vehemently repudiated and will be severely punished”.

    10.What does the National Association of Municipal Prosecutors say?
    The National Association of Municipal Prosecutors (ANPM) stated in a statement that it sympathizes with the Municipal Prosecutor and repudiates Macedo’s violent conduct.

    “The victim was attacked for reasons linked to the exercise of the position while the aggressor, it seems, acted motivated by a criminal intent. The ANPM reaffirms its commitment to raising awareness, preventing and fighting harassment in the field of advocacy and all forms of violence against women”.

    https://g1-globo-com.translate.goog/sp/santos-regiao/noticia/2022/06/22/quem-e-demetrius-oliveira-de-macedo-advogado-que-espancou-procuradora-geral-durante-expediente-em-prefeitura.ghtml?_x_tr_sl=pt&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=pt-BR&_x_tr_pto=wapp

    Quién es Demétrius Oliveira de Macedo, abogado que golpeó al fiscal general en horario de oficina en la alcaldía
    El agresor, que también es fiscal, fue visto como un hombre de pocas palabras y ‘antisocial’. Trabajó para el municipio de Registro, en el interior de São Paulo, desde 2011.
    Por g1 Santos

    22/06/2022 17:38 Actualizado há 5 minutos

    Demétrius Oliveira Macedo agredió a un compañero de trabajo en el Municipio de Registro, en el interior de São Paulo – Foto: Reproducción / Redes Sociales
    Demétrius Oliveira Macedo agredió a un compañero de trabajo en el Municipio de Registro, en el interior de São Paulo – Foto: Reproducción / Redes Sociales

    El abogado Demétrius Oliveira de Macedo, de 34 años, que fue filmado golpeando a la fiscal general Gabriela Samadello Monteiro de Barros , de 39 años, en el Ayuntamiento , en el interior de São Paulo, antes de los ataques, fue visto por quienes lo rodeaban como una persona tranquila, con una Perfil “antisocial”, pero a veces educado.

    Mira el momento del asalto en el siguiente video.

    Video capta brutal agresión a fiscal en alcaldía de São Paulo

    Video capta brutal agresión a fiscal en alcaldía de São Paulo

    Lea también:
    VIDEO: Fiscal golpeado en SP dice que agresor era ‘antisocial’ en el ambiente laboral
    Fiscal golpeada por colega revela que le tenía ‘miedo’ y dice que se le ‘falta al respeto como mujer’; VIDEO
    Agresor de Fiscal fue suspendido y le recortaron el sueldo
    Graduado en Derecho en 2010 en el Centro Universitário Monte Serrat (Unimonte), hoy Universidade São Judas, en Santos, en el litoral paulista, Demétrius aprobó el examen de la Orden de los Abogados de Brasil (OAB) al año siguiente, en 2011, siendo capaz para ejercer la profesión. En el mismo año, comenzó su carrera en el Ayuntamiento de Registro .

    La fiscal general Gabriela dice que el perfil de Demétrius cambió poco después de su ascenso en 2019. La víctima informa que los dos trabajaron juntos durante casi 10 años y, hasta 2018, hablaron y salieron con el equipo de la fiscalía (ver informe a continuación).

    Desde entonces, según ella, se ha vuelto “antisocial”. “No nos hablaba, no decía ‘buenos días’, no saludaba en la calle, no era colaborativo, no se integraba al trabajo. Era prácticamente imposible trabajar en un grupo con él”, dijo la víctima.

    ‘Creo que es capaz de cualquier cosa’, dice fiscal agredida en SP

    ‘Creo que es capaz de cualquier cosa’, dice fiscal agredida en SP

    El entrenador personal de un gimnasio al que asistió Demétrius hasta 2019, en Registro , prefirió no ser identificado, pero dijo que el fiscal era un “tipo de pocas palabras”.

    “En el gimnasio entraba en silencio y salía en silencio. A veces me saludaba, pero no recuerdo haberlo visto hablando con otros compañeros”.

    Asegura que el contacto con el agresor fue “superficial” y cordial. “Siempre fue muy educado. Solía ​​saludarme. A veces hablábamos de fútbol, ​​pero en general era una persona extremadamente tranquila”.

    El profesional de Educación Física, sin embargo, se sorprendió al ver el video de las agresiones. “No esperaba ese tipo de comportamiento de él. El contacto superficial que nunca tuve demostró que haría lo que hizo. Pero un tipo muy tranquilo, muy cerrado, no sé. Es muy extraño”.

    Prisión decretada
    La Justicia decretó la prisión preventiva del abogado Demétrius Oliveira de Macedo , quien agredió a la fiscal general del Municipio de Registro , Gabriela Samadello Monteiro de Barros . El pedido fue presentado en la tarde de este miércoles (22), en el 1° Juzgado Penal de la ciudad, por el delegado Daniel Vaz Rocha, responsable del caso.

    En la solicitud, el delegado señaló que el imputado “viene teniendo serios problemas de relación con mujeres en el ámbito laboral, y, en libertad, expone a peligro su vida, y en consecuencia, el orden público” .

    “La agresión del abogado del registro a un colega no quedará impune. La Policía Civil acaba de pedir la detención del agresor Demétrius Macedo. Que la Justicia haga su parte y castigue a cualquier cobarde que agreda a una mujer”, dijo el gobernador Rodrigo García (PSDB), quien visitó Peruíbe y São Vicente, ambas en el litoral paulista, la mañana de este miércoles (22).

    También según la Policía Civil, la investigación iniciada para investigar el caso reunió fotos y videos de la agresión, así como testimonios del fiscal general para sustentar el pedido de prisión preventiva.

    en libertad
    Según lo informado por g1 , el delegado Fernando Carvalho Gregório, también del 1.er Distrito Policial (DP) del municipio, donde se investiga el caso, afirmó que el agresor fue liberado inicialmente por “falta de flagrante” . Macedo recibió el comunicado poco después de la elaboración de un informe de incidente (BO) en el sitio.

    Lo que se sabe sobre la agresión
    1.¿Quién es la víctima?
    La mujer agredida es Gabriela Samadello Monteiro de Barros, de 39 años. Es procuradora general del Registro , en el interior de São Paulo, y fiscal jefe del agresor. Gabriela estaba en el trabajo cuando fue agredida.

    2.¿Quién es el agresor?
    Demétrius Oliveira Macedo, de 34 años, también es abogado de registro . El autor de los ataques ya había mostrado un comportamiento sospechoso y fue grosero con otro empleado del sector, así lo denunció Gabriela a la policía civil.

    3.¿Qué motivó la agresión?
    La fiscal había exigido acción por el episodio de descortesía contra una empleada, que temía trabajar en el mismo ambiente que Macedo y envió un memorando a la Secretaría Administrativa con una propuesta de procedimiento administrativo.

    El lunes (20), se publicó en el Diario Oficial del municipio la creación de una comisión para investigar los hechos. Probablemente, según Gabriela, eso fue lo que desencadenó los ataques.

    4.¿Cuáles son los detalles de la agresión?
    El caso ocurrió en la tarde del lunes (20), cerca de las 16:50 horas, en la procuraduría municipal, dentro de la alcaldía. La acción filmada por otra empleada muestra que Macedo lanzó puñetazos y patadas a su colega, quien estaba trabajando cuando fue sorprendida por el ataque.

    Según el informe policial (BO), primero la agredió con un codazo en la cabeza y continuó con puñetazos en la cara. La fiscal dijo que trató de defenderse e incluso recibió ayuda de un empleado, quien fue empujado contra la puerta y le golpeó la espalda en la manija.

    Libre para continuar con la agresión, Macedo continuó golpeando y pateando, incluso con otros dos empleados tratando de contenerlo. En un momento, Gabriela logró apartarse del frente del agresor.

    También se puede escuchar en el video que ofende varias veces al fiscal. Apenas escucharon los gritos, dos empleados del sector legal acudieron al lugar y lograron controlar al fiscal.

    5.¿Cuáles son las declaraciones de la víctima?
    Gabriela manifestó que temía que Macedo se rebelara contra ella. “Tenía miedo, sí. Tenía miedo de que pasara esto, pero no imaginé que sería violencia física, pensé que era una ‘discusión’, una discusión”.

    La fiscal también manifestó que se sintió irrespetada ante las agresiones. “Mi dignidad quedó expuesta. Como mujer me faltaron al respeto, así como servidora pública. En resumen, fue una falta de respeto global a mi personalidad como mujer”, dijo.

    Ahora, Gabriela quiere que Macedo sea procesado por las agresiones y ofensas en su contra.

    6.¿Qué le dijo el atacante a la policía?
    Demétrius Oliveira Macedo dijo a la policía civil que sufrió acoso moral en el lugar de trabajo. “Admitió que agredió a la víctima y afirmó que lo hizo porque estaba moralmente acosado”, dijo Fernando Carvalho Gregório, delegado del 1.er Distrito de Policía del municipio, en una entrevista con TV Tribuna, afiliada a Rede Globo.

    7. ¿Será detenido el agresor?
    El agresor del fiscal fue oído por la Policía Civil y posteriormente puesto en libertad, ya que el delegado encargado del caso consideró que no hubo acto.

    “Entendí que no había una situación flagrante, sino un hecho delictivo. Por supuesto, debe ser debidamente investigado. Por eso, registramos el hecho y tomamos todas las medidas necesarias en su momento”, explicó Gregorio.

    El delegado también aclaró que el hecho es analizado por el Ministerio Público (MP) y el Poder Judicial (PJ). “Al final de todo el trabajo tendremos una conclusión de las investigaciones de un caso, y una eventual condena”, subrayó el funcionario policial, quien agregó que no era posible anticipar un resultado sin que se hayan realizado las debidas investigaciones. afuera.

    8. ¿Se exonera al agresor?
    Como medida inmediata para sancionar la agresión, la Municipalidad de Registro publicó en el Diario Oficial N° 1076, el decreto N° 525/2022, que determina la suspensión preventiva de Macedo.

    Según se describe en los actos oficiales, el fiscal quedará suspendido por 30 días, sin percibir salario, a partir del 21 de junio, fecha de la agresión.

    De acuerdo con la explicación del Ayuntamiento, esta medida forma parte del proceso administrativo que debe culminar con la destitución de Macedo. “Es necesario seguir este paso y los trámites legales para que la decisión se tome de manera consecuente”, aclaró.

    9.¿Qué dice la ciudad?
    La administración municipal, a través de una nota, expresó “el más absoluto y profundo repudio a los brutales actos de violencia”.

    “Reafirmamos nuestro compromiso con la prevención y enfrentamiento de todas las formas de violencia, en especial las que victimizan a las mujeres. Los servidores de la Fiscalía Municipal y de la Secretaría de Asuntos Jurídicos recibirán todo el apoyo necesario, incluido el seguimiento psicológico”, escribió.

    La administración municipal también les dijo a los demás servidores: “reciban nuestro apoyo y sepan que la práctica de la violencia es repudiada con vehemencia y será severamente sancionada”.

    10.¿Qué dice la Asociación Nacional de Fiscales Municipales?
    La Asociación Nacional de Fiscales Municipales (ANPM) manifestó en un comunicado que se solidariza con el Fiscal Municipal y repudia la conducta violenta de Macedo.

    “La víctima fue agredida por motivos ligados al ejercicio del cargo mientras que el agresor, al parecer, actuó motivado por una intención delictiva. La ANPM reafirma su compromiso con la sensibilización, prevención y lucha contra el acoso en el ámbito de la incidencia y todas las formas de violencia contra las mujeres”.

    https://g1-globo-com.translate.goog/sp/santos-regiao/noticia/2022/06/22/quem-e-demetrius-oliveira-de-macedo-advogado-que-espancou-procuradora-geral-durante-expediente-em-prefeitura.ghtml?_x_tr_sl=pt&_x_tr_tl=es&_x_tr_hl=pt-BR&_x_tr_pto=wapp

    Qui est Demétrius Oliveira de Macedo, avocat qui a battu le procureur général pendant les heures de bureau à la mairie
    Aggressor, qui est également procureur, était considéré comme un homme peu bavard et “antisocial”. Il travaille pour la municipalité de Registro, à l’intérieur de São Paulo, depuis 2011.
    Par g1 Santos

    22/06/2022 17:38 Actualisé Il y a 5 minutes

    Demétrius Oliveira Macedo agrediu colega de trabalho na Prefeitura de Registro, no interior de São Paulo — Foto: Reprodução/Redes Sociais
    Demétrius Oliveira Macedo a agressé un collègue de la municipalité de Registro, à l’intérieur de São Paulo – Photo : Reproduction / Réseaux sociaux

    L’avocat Demétrius Oliveira de Macedo, 34 ans, qui a été filmé en train de battre le procureur général Gabriela Samadello Monteiro de Barros , 39 ans, à l’hôtel de ville , à l’intérieur de São Paulo, avant les attentats, était vu par son entourage comme une personne calme, avec un profil “antisocial”, mais parfois courtois.

    Regardez le moment de l’agression dans la vidéo ci-dessous.

    Une vidéo montre un procureur brutalement agressé à la mairie de São Paulo

    Une vidéo montre un procureur brutalement agressé à la mairie de São Paulo

    A lire aussi :
    VIDEO: Le procureur battu à SP dit que l’agresseur était “antisocial” dans l’environnement de travail
    La procureure battue par un collègue révèle qu’elle avait “peur” de lui et dit qu’elle est “manque de respect en tant que femme” ; VIDÉO
    L’agresseur du procureur a été suspendu et a vu son salaire réduit
    Diplômé en droit en 2010 au Centro Universitário Monte Serrat (Unimonte), aujourd’hui Universidade São Judas, à Santos, sur la côte de São Paulo, Demétrius a réussi l’examen du Barreau brésilien (OAB) l’année suivante, en 2011, devenant capable pour exercer le métier. La même année, il débute sa carrière à la mairie d’ archives .

    Le procureur général Gabriela affirme que le profil de Demétrius a changé peu de temps après sa promotion en 2019. La victime rapporte que les deux ont travaillé ensemble pendant près de 10 ans et, jusqu’en 2018, ont parlé et sont sortis avec l’équipe du procureur (voir rapport ci-dessous).

    Depuis, selon elle, elle est devenue “antisociale”. “Il ne nous a pas parlé, il n’a pas dit ‘bonjour’, il n’a pas dit bonjour dans la rue, il n’était pas collaboratif, il ne s’intégrait pas au travail. C’était pratiquement impossible de travailler en groupe avec lui”, raconte la victime.

    “Je pense qu’il est capable de tout”, déclare le procureur agressé à SP

    “Je pense qu’il est capable de tout”, déclare le procureur agressé à SP

    L’entraîneur personnel d’une salle de sport que Demétrius a fréquentée jusqu’en 2019, à Registro , a préféré ne pas être identifié, mais a déclaré que le procureur était un “type de peu de mots”.

    “Au gymnase, il entrait en silence et sortait en silence. Parfois, il me saluait, mais je ne me souviens pas l’avoir vu parler à d’autres collègues”.

    Elle affirme que le contact avec l’agresseur était “superficiel” et cordial. “Il était toujours très poli. Il avait l’habitude de me saluer. Parfois, nous parlions de football, mais dans l’ensemble, c’était une personne extrêmement calme.”

    Le professionnel de l’Education physique a cependant été surpris en voyant la vidéo des agressions. “Je ne m’attendais pas à ce genre de comportement de sa part. Le contact superficiel que j’ai eu n’a jamais montré qu’il ferait ce qu’il a fait. Mais un gars très calme, très fermé, je ne sais pas. C’est très étrange.”

    Emprisonnement décrété
    La justice a décrété la détention préventive du procureur Demétrius Oliveira de Macedo , qui a attaqué le procureur général de la municipalité de Registro , Gabriela Samadello Monteiro de Barros . La demande a été présentée ce mercredi après-midi (22), au 1er tribunal correctionnel de la ville, par le délégué Daniel Vaz Rocha, qui est chargé de l’affaire.

    Dans la requête, le délégué a souligné que l’accusé “a eu de graves problèmes relationnels avec les femmes dans le milieu du travail, et, sur la liberté, il expose leur vie au danger, et par conséquent, l’ordre public” .

    « L’agression du procureur du greffe envers un collègue ne restera pas impunie. La police civile vient de demander l’arrestation de l’agresseur Demétrius Macedo. Que la justice fasse sa part et punisse tout lâche qui attaque une femme », a déclaré le gouverneur Rodrigo Garcia (PSDB), qui s’est rendu à Peruíbe et São Vicente, tous deux sur la côte de São Paulo, ce mercredi matin (22). ).

    Toujours selon la police civile, l’enquête ouverte pour enquêter sur l’affaire a rassemblé des photos et des vidéos de l’agression, ainsi que des témoignages du procureur général à l’appui de la demande de détention préventive.

    En liberté
    Comme l’a rapporté g1 , le délégué Fernando Carvalho Gregório, également du 1er district de police (DP) de la municipalité, où l’affaire fait l’objet d’une enquête, a affirmé que l’ agresseur avait été initialement libéré pour “absence flagrante” . Macedo a reçu le communiqué peu de temps après la préparation d’un rapport d’incident (BO) sur le site.

    Que sait-on de l’agressivité
    1.Qui est la victime ?
    La femme agressée est Gabriela Samadello Monteiro de Barros, 39 ans. Elle est procureure générale du greffe , à l’intérieur de São Paulo, et procureure en chef de l’agresseur. Gabriela était au travail lorsqu’elle a été agressée.

    2. Qui est l’agresseur ?
    Demétrius Oliveira Macedo, 34 ans, est également avocat au greffe . L’auteur des attentats avait déjà fait preuve d’un comportement suspect et s’était montré impoli envers un autre employé du secteur, comme l’a rapporté Gabriela à la police civile.

    3. Qu’est-ce qui a motivé l’agression ?
    Le procureur avait demandé une action sur l’épisode d’impolitesse contre une employée, car elle avait peur de travailler dans le même environnement que Macedo et avait envoyé un mémorandum au secrétariat administratif avec une proposition de procédure administrative.

    Lundi (20), la création d’une commission chargée d’enquêter sur les faits a été publiée au Journal officiel de la municipalité. Probablement, selon Gabriela, c’est ce qui a déclenché les attaques.

    4.Quels sont les détails de l’agression ?
    L’affaire s’est déroulée lundi après-midi (20), vers 16h50, au parquet de la ville, à l’intérieur de la mairie. L’action filmée par un autre employé montre que Macedo a lancé des coups de poing et donné des coups de pied à sa collègue, qui travaillait lorsqu’elle a été surprise par l’attaque.

    Selon le rapport de police (BO), il l’a attaquée d’abord avec un coude à la tête et a continué avec des coups de poing au visage. Le procureur a déclaré qu’elle avait tenté de se défendre et avait même reçu l’aide d’un employé, qui a été poussé contre la porte et l’a frappée en retour sur la poignée.

    Libre de poursuivre l’agression, Macedo a continué à donner des coups de poing et de pied, même avec deux autres employés essayant de le contenir. À un moment donné, Gabriela a réussi à être retirée du front de l’agresseur.

    Il est également possible d’entendre dans la vidéo qu’il offense le procureur à plusieurs reprises. Dès qu’ils ont entendu les cris, deux employés du secteur judiciaire se sont rendus sur les lieux et ont réussi à contrôler le procureur.

    5.Quelles sont les déclarations de la victime ?
    Gabriela a déclaré qu’elle craignait que Macedo ne se révolte contre elle. “J’avais peur, oui. J’avais peur que ça arrive, mais je n’imaginais pas que ce serait de la violence physique, je pensais que c’était une ‘dispute’, une dispute”.

    La procureure a également déclaré qu’elle s’était sentie irrespectueuse face aux agressions. « Ma dignité a été exposée. En tant que femme, on m’a manqué de respect, ainsi qu’en tant que fonctionnaire. En bref, c’était un manque de respect global envers ma personnalité de femme”, a-t-elle déclaré.

    Maintenant, Gabriela veut que Macedo soit poursuivie en raison des agressions et des délits dont elle est victime.

    6.Qu’est-ce que l’agresseur a dit à la police ?
    Demétrius Oliveira Macedo a déclaré à la police civile qu’il avait subi du harcèlement moral au travail. “Il a admis avoir agressé la victime et a affirmé qu’il l’avait fait parce qu’il était moralement harcelé”, a déclaré Fernando Carvalho Gregório, délégué du 1er district de police de la municipalité, dans une interview à TV Tribuna, affiliée à Rede Globo.

    7. L’agresseur sera-t-il arrêté ?
    L’agresseur du procureur a été entendu par la police civile puis relâché, le délégué chargé de l’affaire ayant estimé qu’il n’y avait pas eu d’acte.

    “J’ai compris qu’il n’y avait pas de situation flagrante, mais un fait criminel. Bien sûr, cela devrait faire l’objet d’une enquête en bonne et due forme. Par conséquent, nous avons enregistré l’événement et pris toutes les mesures nécessaires à ce moment-là”, a expliqué Gregório.

    Le délégué a également précisé que le fait est analysé par le ministère public (MP) et le pouvoir judiciaire (PJ). “A la fin de tout le travail, nous aurons une conclusion des investigations dans une affaire, et une éventuelle condamnation”, a souligné le responsable de la police, qui a ajouté qu’il n’était pas possible d’anticiper un résultat sans que les investigations appropriées aient été menées. dehors.

    8. L’agresseur sera-t-il disculpé ?
    Comme mesure immédiate pour punir l’agression, la municipalité de Registro a publié au Journal officiel n° 1076, le décret n° 525/2022, déterminant la suspension préventive de Macedo.

    Comme décrit dans les actes officiels, le procureur sera suspendu pendant 30 jours, sans percevoir de salaire, à compter du 21 juin, date de l’agression.

    Selon les explications de la mairie, cette mesure fait partie du processus administratif qui devrait aboutir au limogeage de Macedo. “Il faut suivre cette étape et les procédures légales pour que la décision soit prise de manière cohérente”, a-t-il précisé.

    9.Que dit la ville ?
    L’administration municipale, à travers une note, a exprimé “la répudiation la plus absolue et la plus profonde des actes de violence brutaux”.

    « Nous réaffirmons notre engagement dans la prévention et la lutte contre toutes les formes de violence, en particulier celles dont sont victimes les femmes. Les serveurs du Parquet général municipal et de la Direction des affaires juridiques recevront tout le soutien nécessaire, y compris un suivi psychologique », a-t-il écrit.

    L’administration municipale a également dit aux autres serveurs : “recevez notre soutien et sachez que la pratique de la violence est répudiée avec véhémence et sera sévèrement punie”.

    10. Que dit l’Association nationale des procureurs municipaux ?
    L’Association nationale des procureurs municipaux (ANPM) a déclaré dans un communiqué qu’elle sympathise avec le procureur municipal et répudie la conduite violente de Macedo.

    « La victime a été agressée pour des motifs liés à l’exercice du poste alors que l’agresseur, semble-t-il, a agi motivé par une intention criminelle. L’ANPM réaffirme son engagement à sensibiliser, prévenir et combattre le harcèlement dans le domaine du plaidoyer et toutes les formes de violences faites aux femmes ».

    https://g1-globo-com.translate.goog/sp/santos-regiao/noticia/2022/06/22/quem-e-demetrius-oliveira-de-macedo-advogado-que-espancou-procuradora-geral-durante-expediente-em-prefeitura.ghtml?_x_tr_sl=pt&_x_tr_tl=fr&_x_tr_hl=pt-BR&_x_tr_pto=wapp

    Wer ist Demétrius Oliveira de Macedo, Anwalt, der den Generalstaatsanwalt während der Sprechstunden im Rathaus schlug?
    Aggressor, der auch Staatsanwalt ist, galt als wortkarg und „asozial“. Seit 2011 arbeitet er für die Gemeinde Registro im Landesinneren von São Paulo.
    Von g1 Santos

    22.06.2022 17:38 Aktualisiert Vor 6 Minuten

    Demétrius Oliveira Macedo griff einen Mitarbeiter der Gemeinde Registro im Inneren von São Paulo an – Foto: Reproduktion / Soziale Netzwerke
    Demétrius Oliveira Macedo griff einen Mitarbeiter der Gemeinde Registro im Inneren von São Paulo an – Foto: Reproduktion / Soziale Netzwerke

    Der Anwalt Demétrius Oliveira de Macedo, 34, der vor den Anschlägen im Rathaus im Inneren von São Paulo dabei gefilmt wurde, wie er die Generalstaatsanwältin Gabriela Samadello Monteiro de Barros , 39, schlug , wurde von seinen Mitmenschen als ruhige Person mit einem “asoziales” Profil, aber manchmal höflich.

    Sehen Sie sich den Moment des Angriffs im Video unten an.

    Das Video zeigt, wie der Staatsanwalt im Rathaus von São Paulo brutal angegriffen wird

    Das Video zeigt, wie der Staatsanwalt im Rathaus von São Paulo brutal angegriffen wird

    Lesen Sie auch:
    VIDEO: Staatsanwalt in SP geschlagen, sagt, dass der Angreifer im Arbeitsumfeld „asozial“ war
    Staatsanwältin von Kollegin geschlagen gibt an, dass sie „Angst“ vor ihm hatte und sagt, sie werde „als Frau nicht respektiert“; VIDEO
    Der Angreifer der Staatsanwaltschaft wurde suspendiert und sein Gehalt gekürzt
    Demétrius schloss 2010 sein Jurastudium am Centro Universitário Monte Serrat (Unimonte), heute Universidade São Judas, in Santos an der Küste von São Paulo ab und legte im folgenden Jahr, 2011, die Prüfung der Brasilianischen Anwaltskammer (OAB) ab und wurde fähig den Beruf auszuüben. Im selben Jahr begann er seine Laufbahn bei der City Hall of Record .

    Generalstaatsanwältin Gabriela sagt, dass sich das Profil von Demétrius kurz nach ihrer Beförderung im Jahr 2019 geändert habe. Das Opfer berichtet, dass die beiden fast 10 Jahre zusammengearbeitet und bis 2018 mit dem Team der Staatsanwaltschaft gesprochen und ausgegangen seien (siehe Bericht unten).

    Seitdem sei sie ihren eigenen Angaben zufolge „asozial“ geworden. “Er hat nicht mit uns geredet, er hat nicht ‘Guten Morgen’ gesagt, er hat nicht auf der Straße Hallo gesagt, er war nicht kooperativ, er hat sich nicht in die Arbeit integriert. Es war praktisch unmöglich zu arbeiten in einer Gruppe mit ihm”, sagte das Opfer.

    „Ich denke, er ist zu allem fähig“, sagt der angegriffene Staatsanwalt in SP

    „Ich denke, er ist zu allem fähig“, sagt der angegriffene Staatsanwalt in SP

    Der Personal Trainer eines Fitnessstudios, das Demétrius bis 2019 besuchte, zog es im Registro vor, nicht genannt zu werden, sagte aber, der Staatsanwalt sei ein „Typ der wenigen Worte“.

    “Im Fitnessstudio ist er schweigend eingetreten und schweigend gegangen. Manchmal hat er mich gegrüßt, aber ich kann mich nicht erinnern, ihn mit anderen Kollegen sprechen gesehen zu haben.”

    Sie behauptet, der Kontakt mit dem Angreifer sei “oberflächlich” und herzlich gewesen. “Er war immer sehr höflich. Er hat mich immer begrüßt. Manchmal haben wir über Fußball gesprochen, aber insgesamt war er ein sehr ruhiger Mensch.”

    Der Sportlehrer war jedoch überrascht, als er das Video der Aggressionen sah. „Ich habe so ein Verhalten nicht von ihm erwartet. Der oberflächliche Kontakt, den ich hatte, hat nie gezeigt, dass er das tun würde, was er tut. Aber ein sehr ruhiger Typ, sehr verschlossen, ich weiß nicht. Es ist sehr seltsam.“

    Haft verhängt
    Die Justiz verfügte die Sicherungsverwahrung des Anwalts Demétrius Oliveira de Macedo , der die Generalstaatsanwältin der Gemeinde Registro , Gabriela Samadello Monteiro de Barros , angegriffen hatte . Der Antrag wurde an diesem Mittwochnachmittag (22.) beim 1. Strafgericht der Stadt von dem für den Fall zuständigen Delegierten Daniel Vaz Rocha eingereicht.

    In dem Antrag wies der Delegierte darauf hin, dass der Angeklagte “ernsthafte Beziehungsprobleme mit Frauen im Arbeitsumfeld hatte und aus Freiheit ihr Leben und damit die öffentliche Ordnung in Gefahr bringt” .

    „Die Aggression des Standesbeamten gegenüber einem Kollegen wird nicht ungestraft bleiben. Die Zivilpolizei hat soeben um die Verhaftung des Aggressors Demétrius Macedo gebeten. Möge die Gerechtigkeit ihren Teil tun und jeden Feigling bestrafen, der eine Frau angreift“, sagte Gouverneur Rodrigo Garcia (PSDB), der an diesem Mittwochmorgen (22.) Peruíbe und São Vicente, beide an der Küste von São Paulo, besuchte.

    Nach Angaben der Zivilpolizei sammelte die zur Untersuchung des Falls eingeleitete Untersuchung Fotos und Videos der Aggression sowie Zeugenaussagen des Generalstaatsanwalts, um den Antrag auf Sicherungsverwahrung zu untermauern.

    In Freiheit
    Wie g1 berichtete , behauptete der Delegierte Fernando Carvalho Gregório, ebenfalls vom 1. Polizeibezirk (DP) der Gemeinde, in der der Fall untersucht wird, dass der Angreifer zunächst wegen „mangelnder Offenheit“ freigelassen worden sei . Macedo erhielt die Freigabe kurz nach der Erstellung eines Vorfallberichts (BO) vor Ort.

    Was ist über Aggression bekannt
    1. Wer ist das Opfer?
    Bei der angegriffenen Frau handelt es sich um Gabriela Samadello Monteiro de Barros, 39 Jahre alt. Sie ist die Generalstaatsanwältin des Registers im Inneren von São Paulo und die Chefanklägerin des Angreifers. Gabriela war bei der Arbeit, als sie angegriffen wurde.

    2.Wer ist der Angreifer?
    Demétrius Oliveira Macedo, 34, ist ebenfalls Registeranwalt . Der Täter der Angriffe hatte bereits verdächtiges Verhalten gezeigt und war gegenüber einem anderen Mitarbeiter des Sektors unhöflich, wie Gabriela der Zivilpolizei meldete.

    3. Was hat die Aggression motiviert?
    Der Staatsanwalt hatte Maßnahmen wegen der Unhöflichkeit gegen eine Angestellte gefordert, da sie Angst hatte, in derselben Umgebung wie Macedo zu arbeiten, und ein Memorandum mit einem Vorschlag für ein Verwaltungsverfahren an das Verwaltungssekretariat geschickt.

    Am Montag (20.) wurde die Einsetzung einer Kommission zur Untersuchung des Sachverhalts im Amtsblatt der Gemeinde veröffentlicht. Wahrscheinlich, so Gabriela, war das der Auslöser der Angriffe.

    4.Was sind die Einzelheiten der Aggression?
    Der Fall fand am Montagnachmittag (20) gegen 16.50 Uhr in der Staatsanwaltschaft im Rathaus statt. Die von einer anderen Mitarbeiterin gefilmte Aktion zeigt, dass Macedo Schläge austeilte und ihre Kollegin trat, die gerade arbeitete, als sie von dem Angriff überrascht wurde.

    Laut Polizeibericht (BO) attackierte er sie zunächst mit einem Ellbogen am Kopf und setzte mit Schlägen ins Gesicht fort. Der Staatsanwalt sagte, sie habe versucht, sich zu verteidigen und habe sogar Hilfe von einem Angestellten erhalten, der gegen die Tür gestoßen und ihr mit dem Rücken auf die Klinke geschlagen habe.

    Macedo war frei, die Aggression fortzusetzen, und schlug und trat weiter, obwohl zwei andere Angestellte versuchten, ihn einzudämmen. Irgendwann gelang es Gabriela, sich von der Front des Angreifers zu entfernen.

    In dem Video ist auch zu hören, dass er die Staatsanwaltschaft mehrfach beleidigt. Sobald sie die Schreie hörten, gingen zwei Mitarbeiter aus dem Rechtsbereich zum Tatort und schafften es, die Staatsanwaltschaft zu kontrollieren.

    5.Was sind die Aussagen des Opfers?
    Gabriela erklärte, sie befürchte, Macedo würde sich gegen sie auflehnen. „Ich hatte Angst, ja. Ich hatte Angst, dass das passieren würde, aber ich habe mir nicht vorgestellt, dass es körperliche Gewalt sein würde, ich dachte, es wäre ein ‚Argument‘, ein Streit.“

    Die Staatsanwältin erklärte auch, dass sie sich angesichts der Aggressionen nicht respektiert fühle. „Meine Würde wurde entblößt. Als Frau wurde ich ebenso wenig respektiert wie als Beamtin. Kurz gesagt, es war eine globale Missachtung meiner Persönlichkeit als Frau“, sagte sie.

    Jetzt will Gabriela, dass Macedo wegen der Aggressionen und Straftaten gegen sie strafrechtlich verfolgt wird.

    6. Was hat der Angreifer der Polizei gesagt?
    Demétrius Oliveira Macedo teilte der Zivilpolizei mit, dass er am Arbeitsplatz moralisch drangsaliert wurde. „Er gab zu, dass er das Opfer angegriffen hatte, und behauptete, er habe dies getan, weil er moralisch belästigt worden sei“, sagte Fernando Carvalho Gregório, Delegierter des 1. Polizeibezirks der Gemeinde, in einem Interview mit TV Tribuna, das mit Rede Globo verbunden ist.

    7. Wird der Angreifer festgenommen?
    Der Aggressor des Staatsanwalts wurde von der Zivilpolizei angehört und anschließend freigelassen, da der für den Fall zuständige Delegierte der Ansicht war, dass keine Tat vorliegt.

    „Mir war klar, dass es sich nicht um eine eklatante Situation, sondern um eine kriminelle Tatsache handelte. Natürlich sollte dies ordnungsgemäß untersucht werden. Deshalb haben wir den Vorfall registriert und zu diesem Zeitpunkt alle erforderlichen Schritte unternommen“, erklärte Gregório.

    Der Delegierte stellte auch klar, dass die Tatsache von der Staatsanwaltschaft (MP) und der Justiz (PJ) analysiert wird. „Am Ende der ganzen Arbeit werden wir einen Abschluss der Ermittlungen in einem Fall und eine eventuelle Verurteilung haben“, betonte der Polizeibeamte, der hinzufügte, dass es nicht möglich sei, ein Ergebnis vorherzusehen, ohne dass die ordnungsgemäßen Ermittlungen durchgeführt worden seien aus.

    8. Wird der Angreifer entlastet?
    Als Sofortmaßnahme zur Bestrafung der Aggression veröffentlichte die Gemeinde Registro im Amtsblatt Nr. 1076 das Dekret Nr. 525/2022, das die präventive Suspendierung von Macedo festlegte.

    Wie in den Amtshandlungen beschrieben, wird der Staatsanwalt ab dem 21. Juni, dem Tag des Überfalls, für 30 Tage ohne Gehaltszahlung vom Dienst suspendiert.

    Diese Maßnahme sei Teil des Verwaltungsverfahrens, das mit der Entlassung Macedos enden solle, so die Begründung des Rathauses. „Es ist notwendig, diesen Schritt und die rechtlichen Verfahren zu befolgen, damit die Entscheidung auf einheitliche Weise getroffen wird“, stellte er klar.

    9.Was sagt die Stadt?
    Die Gemeindeverwaltung drückte in einer Note „die absolutste und tiefste Zurückweisung brutaler Gewaltakte“ aus.

    „Wir bekräftigen unser Engagement für die Prävention und Bekämpfung aller Formen von Gewalt, insbesondere derer, die Frauen zum Opfer fallen. Die Server der Generalstaatsanwaltschaft der Stadt und der Rechtsabteilung werden alle notwendige Unterstützung erhalten, einschließlich psychologischer Überwachung“, schrieb er.

    Auch die Gemeindeverwaltung teilte den anderen Servern mit: „Bekommen Sie unsere Unterstützung und wissen Sie, dass die Ausübung von Gewalt vehement abgelehnt und hart bestraft wird“.

    10.Was sagt der Landesverband der Kommunalstaatsanwälte?
    Die National Association of Municipal Prosecutors (ANPM) erklärte in einer Erklärung, dass sie mit der Staatsanwaltschaft sympathisiert und Macedos gewalttätiges Verhalten zurückweist.

    „Das Opfer wurde aus Gründen angegriffen, die mit der Ausübung des Amtes zusammenhängen, während der Angreifer offenbar in krimineller Absicht handelte. Die ANPM bekräftigt ihr Engagement für die Sensibilisierung, Prävention und Bekämpfung von Belästigung im Bereich der Interessenvertretung und aller Formen von Gewalt gegen Frauen“.

    https://g1-globo-com.translate.goog/sp/santos-regiao/noticia/2022/06/22/quem-e-demetrius-oliveira-de-macedo-advogado-que-espancou-procuradora-geral-durante-expediente-em-prefeitura.ghtml?_x_tr_sl=pt&_x_tr_tl=de&_x_tr_hl=pt-BR&_x_tr_pto=wapp

    1. Wie is Demétrius Oliveira de Macedo, advocaat die de procureur-generaal sloeg tijdens kantooruren in het stadhuis?
      Agressor, die ook officier van justitie is, werd gezien als een man van weinig woorden en ‘asociaal’. Hij werkte sinds 2011 voor de gemeente Registro, in het binnenland van São Paulo.
      Door g1 Santos

      22-06-2022 17:38 Bijgewerkt 7 minuten geleden

      Demétrius Oliveira Macedo viel een collega aan in de gemeente Registro, in het binnenland van São Paulo – Foto: reproductie / sociale netwerken
      Demétrius Oliveira Macedo viel een collega aan in de gemeente Registro, in het binnenland van São Paulo – Foto: reproductie / sociale netwerken

      Advocaat Demétrius Oliveira de Macedo, 34, die werd gefilmd terwijl hij procureur-generaal Gabriela Samadello Monteiro de Barros , 39, in elkaar sloeg in het stadhuis , in het binnenland van São Paulo, vóór de aanslagen, werd door de mensen om hem heen gezien als een stil persoon, met een “asociaal” profiel, maar soms beleefd.

      Bekijk het moment van de aanval in de onderstaande video.

      Op video is te zien hoe de aanklager brutaal wordt aangevallen in het stadhuis in São Paulo

      Op video is te zien hoe de aanklager brutaal wordt aangevallen in het stadhuis in São Paulo

      Lees ook:
      VIDEO: Aanklager geslagen in SP zegt dat agressor ‘asociaal’ was in werkomgeving
      Aanklager in elkaar geslagen door collega onthult dat ze ‘bang’ voor hem was en zegt ‘als vrouw niet gerespecteerd te worden’; VIDEO
      De agressor van de aanklager werd geschorst en kreeg een verlaging van zijn salaris
      Afgestudeerd in de rechten in 2010 aan het Centro Universitário Monte Serrat (Unimonte), tegenwoordig Universidade São Judas, in Santos, aan de kust van São Paulo, slaagde Demétrius het volgende jaar, in 2011, voor het examen van de Braziliaanse Orde van Advocaten (OAB) het beroep uit te oefenen. In datzelfde jaar begon hij zijn carrière bij het Stadhuis van Record .

      Procureur-generaal Gabriela zegt dat het profiel van Demétrius veranderde kort nadat ze in 2019 promoveerde. Het slachtoffer meldt dat de twee bijna 10 jaar hebben samengewerkt en tot 2018 met het team van de aanklager hebben gesproken en uitgegaan (zie verslag hieronder).

      Sindsdien is ze volgens haar “asociaal” geworden. “Hij sprak niet met ons, hij zei geen ‘goedemorgen’, hij zei geen hallo op straat, hij werkte niet mee, hij integreerde niet in het werk. Het was praktisch onmogelijk om te werken in een groep met hem”, zei het slachtoffer.

      ‘Ik denk dat hij tot alles in staat is’, zegt officier van justitie aangevallen in SP

      ‘Ik denk dat hij tot alles in staat is’, zegt officier van justitie aangevallen in SP

      De personal trainer van een sportschool waar Demétrius tot 2019 aanwezig was, in Registro , wilde liever niet worden geïdentificeerd, maar zei dat de officier van justitie een “man van weinig woorden” was.

      “In de sportschool kwam hij geruisloos binnen en ging geruisloos weg. Soms groette hij me, maar ik kan me niet herinneren hem met andere collega’s te hebben zien praten”.

      Ze beweert dat het contact met de agressor “oppervlakkig” en hartelijk was. “Hij was altijd heel beleefd. Hij groette me altijd. Soms hadden we het over voetbal, maar over het algemeen was hij een extreem stil persoon.”

      De professional Lichamelijke Opvoeding was echter verrast toen hij de video van de agressies zag. “Dat soort gedrag had ik niet van hem verwacht. Het oppervlakkige contact waarvan ik nooit had laten zien dat hij zou doen wat hij deed. Maar een heel rustige man, heel gesloten, ik weet het niet. Het is heel vreemd.”

      gevangenisstraf afgekondigd
      De Justitie beval de preventieve hechtenis van de advocaat Demétrius Oliveira de Macedo , die de procureur-generaal van de gemeente Registro , Gabriela Samadello Monteiro de Barros, aanviel . Het verzoek werd deze woensdagmiddag (22) ingediend bij de 1e correctionele rechtbank van de stad, door gedelegeerde Daniel Vaz Rocha, die verantwoordelijk is voor de zaak.

      In het verzoek wees de afgevaardigde erop dat de beschuldigde “ernstige relatieproblemen heeft gehad met vrouwen in de werkomgeving, en wat betreft vrijheid stelt hij hun leven bloot aan gevaar en bijgevolg aan de openbare orde” .

      “De agressie van de registeradvocaat tegen een collega blijft niet ongestraft. De civiele politie heeft zojuist om de arrestatie van de agressor Demétrius Macedo gevraagd. Moge Justitie haar deel doen en elke lafaard straffen die een vrouw aanvalt’, zei gouverneur Rodrigo Garcia (PSDB), die deze woensdagochtend Peruíbe en São Vicente bezocht, beide aan de kust van São Paulo (22).

      Ook volgens de civiele politie verzamelde het onderzoek dat werd gestart om de zaak te onderzoeken, foto’s en video’s van de agressie, evenals getuigenissen van de procureur-generaal om het verzoek om preventieve hechtenis te ondersteunen.

      in vrijheid
      Zoals gemeld door g1 beweerde afgevaardigde Fernando Carvalho Gregório, ook van het 1e politiedistrict (DP) van de gemeente, waar de zaak wordt onderzocht, dat de agressor aanvankelijk was vrijgelaten wegens “gebrek aan flagrante” . Macedo ontving de vrijlating kort na het opstellen van een incidentenrapportage (BO) op de locatie.

      Wat is er bekend over agressie
      1.Wie is het slachtoffer?
      De aangevallen vrouw is Gabriela Samadello Monteiro de Barros, 39 jaar oud. Zij is de procureur-generaal van de griffie , in het binnenland van São Paulo, en de hoofdaanklager van de agressor. Gabriela was aan het werk toen ze werd aangevallen.

      2.Wie is de agressor?
      Demétrius Oliveira Macedo, 34, is ook een registeradvocaat . De dader van de aanslagen had al verdacht gedrag vertoond en was onbeleefd tegen een andere medewerker van de sector, zo meldt Gabriela bij de civiele politie.

      3. Wat motiveerde de agressie?
      De officier van justitie had actie geëist naar aanleiding van de aflevering van onbeschoftheid tegen een werknemer, omdat ze bang was om in dezelfde omgeving als Macedo te werken, en stuurde een memorandum naar het Administratief Secretariaat met een voorstel voor een administratieve procedure.

      Maandag (20) is in het Staatsblad van de gemeente de instelling van een commissie voor feitenonderzoek gepubliceerd. Waarschijnlijk, volgens Gabriela, was dat de aanleiding voor de aanvallen.

      4. Wat zijn de details van de agressie?
      De zaak vond plaats op maandagmiddag (20), rond 16.50 uur, in het stadsadvocaat, in het stadhuis. Op de actie gefilmd door een andere medewerker is te zien dat Macedo stoten uitdeelde en haar collega schopte, die aan het werk was toen ze werd verrast door de aanval.

      Volgens het politierapport (BO) viel hij haar eerst aan met een elleboog tegen het hoofd en ging verder met stoten in het gezicht. De officier van justitie zei dat ze zichzelf probeerde te verdedigen en zelfs hulp kreeg van een medewerker, die tegen de deur werd geduwd en haar terug op de kruk sloeg.

      Vrij om de agressie voort te zetten, bleef Macedo slaan en schoppen, zelfs met twee andere medewerkers die hem probeerden in bedwang te houden. Op een gegeven moment slaagde Gabriela erin om van de voorkant van de agressor te worden verwijderd.

      Ook is in de video te horen dat hij de officier van justitie meerdere keren beledigt. Zodra ze het geschreeuw hoorden, gingen twee medewerkers uit de juridische sector ter plaatse en wisten de officier van justitie onder controle te krijgen.

      5.Wat zijn de verklaringen van het slachtoffer?
      Gabriela verklaarde dat ze vreesde dat Macedo tegen haar in opstand zou komen. “Ik was bang, ja. Ik was bang dat dit zou gebeuren, maar ik had niet gedacht dat het fysiek geweld zou zijn. Ik dacht dat het een ‘argument’ was, een ruzie”.

      De officier van justitie verklaarde ook dat ze zich niet gerespecteerd voelde in het licht van de agressie. “Mijn waardigheid werd blootgelegd. Als vrouw werd ik niet gerespecteerd, evenals een ambtenaar. Kortom, het was een wereldwijd gebrek aan respect voor mijn persoonlijkheid als vrouw”, zei ze.

      Nu wil Gabriela dat Macedo wordt vervolgd als gevolg van de agressie en overtredingen tegen haar.

      6. Wat zei de aanvaller tegen de politie?
      Demétrius Oliveira Macedo vertelde de civiele politie dat hij morele intimidatie had ondergaan op de werkplek. “Hij gaf toe dat hij het slachtoffer had aangevallen en beweerde dat hij dat deed omdat hij moreel werd lastiggevallen”, zei Fernando Carvalho Gregório, afgevaardigde van het 1e politiedistrict van de gemeente, in een interview met TV Tribuna, verbonden aan Rede Globo.

      7. Wordt de agressor gearresteerd?
      De agressor van de openbare aanklager werd gehoord door de civiele politie en vervolgens vrijgelaten, aangezien de voor de zaak verantwoordelijke afgevaardigde van mening was dat er geen actie was ondernomen.

      “Ik begreep dat er geen sprake was van een flagrante, maar van een crimineel feit. Natuurlijk moet het naar behoren worden onderzocht. Daarom hebben we het voorval geregistreerd en hebben we destijds alle nodige stappen ondernomen”, legt Gregorio uit.

      De afgevaardigde verduidelijkte ook dat het feit wordt geanalyseerd door het Openbaar Ministerie (MP) en de Rechtspraak (PJ). “Aan het einde van al het werk zullen we een conclusie van het onderzoek in een zaak hebben en een uiteindelijke veroordeling”, benadrukte de politiefunctionaris, die eraan toevoegde dat het niet mogelijk was om op een resultaat te anticiperen zonder dat de juiste onderzoeken zijn uitgevoerd uit.

      8. Zal de agressor worden vrijgesproken?
      Als een onmiddellijke maatregel om de agressie te bestraffen, heeft de gemeente Registro in het staatsblad nr. 1076 het decreet nr. 525/2022 gepubliceerd, waarin de preventieve schorsing van Macedo wordt bepaald.

      Zoals beschreven in de officiële wetten, wordt de officier van justitie 30 dagen geschorst, zonder salaris te ontvangen, vanaf 21 juni, de datum van de aanval.

      Volgens de toelichting van het gemeentehuis maakt deze maatregel deel uit van het bestuurlijke proces dat moet eindigen in het ontslag van Macedo. “Het is noodzakelijk om deze stap en de juridische procedures te volgen, zodat de beslissing op een consistente manier wordt genomen”, verduidelijkte hij.

      9.Wat zegt de stad?
      Het gemeentebestuur sprak door middel van een nota “de meest absolute en diepgaande verwerping van brute gewelddaden” uit.

      “We herbevestigen onze inzet voor het voorkomen en bestrijden van alle vormen van geweld, met name geweld waarbij vrouwen slachtoffer worden. De servers van het Openbaar Ministerie en het Departement Juridische Zaken zullen alle nodige ondersteuning krijgen, inclusief psychologische monitoring”, schreef hij.

      Het gemeentebestuur zei ook tegen de andere servers: “Ontvang onze steun en weet dat de praktijk van geweld krachtig wordt verworpen en streng zal worden bestraft”.

      10. Wat zegt de Landelijke Vereniging van Gemeentelijke Aanklagers?
      De Landelijke Vereniging van Gemeentelijke Aanklagers (ANPM) stelt in een verklaring sympathie te hebben met de Gemeentelijke Aanklager en het gewelddadige optreden van Macedo af te wijzen.

      “Het slachtoffer werd aangevallen om redenen die verband hielden met de uitoefening van de functie, terwijl de agressor, zo lijkt het, handelde met criminele bedoelingen. De ANPM bevestigt opnieuw haar inzet voor bewustmaking, preventie en bestrijding van intimidatie op het gebied van belangenbehartiging en alle vormen van geweld tegen vrouwen”.

      https://g1-globo-com.translate.goog/sp/santos-regiao/noticia/2022/06/22/quem-e-demetrius-oliveira-de-macedo-advogado-que-espancou-procuradora-geral-durante-expediente-em-prefeitura.ghtml?_x_tr_sl=pt&_x_tr_tl=nl&_x_tr_hl=pt-BR&_x_tr_pto=wapp

      Chi è Demétrius Oliveira de Macedo, avvocato che ha picchiato il procuratore generale durante l’orario di ufficio in municipio
      L’aggressore, che è anche un pubblico ministero, è stato visto come un uomo di poche parole e “antisociale”. Ha lavorato per il comune di Registro, all’interno di San Paolo, dal 2011.
      Per g1 Santos

      22/06/2022 17:38 Aggiornato 8 minuti fa

      Demétrius Oliveira Macedo ha aggredito un collega del Comune di Registro, all’interno di San Paolo – Foto: Riproduzione/Reti sociali
      Demétrius Oliveira Macedo ha aggredito un collega del Comune di Registro, all’interno di San Paolo – Foto: Riproduzione/Reti sociali

      L’avvocato Demétrius Oliveira de Macedo, 34 anni, che è stato filmato mentre picchiava il procuratore generale Gabriela Samadello Monteiro de Barros , 39 anni, al municipio , all’interno di San Paolo, prima degli attacchi, era visto da coloro che lo circondavano come una persona tranquilla, con un Profilo “antisociale”, ma a volte garbato.

      Guarda il momento dell’assalto nel video qui sotto.

      Il video cattura il pubblico ministero mentre viene brutalmente aggredito nel municipio di San Paolo

      Il video cattura il pubblico ministero mentre viene brutalmente aggredito nel municipio di San Paolo

      Leggi anche:
      VIDEO: Il pubblico ministero picchiato a SP afferma che l’aggressore era “antisociale” nell’ambiente di lavoro
      Il pubblico ministero picchiato dal collega rivela di aver “paura” di lui e afferma di essere “mancata di rispetto come donna”; VIDEO
      L’aggressore del pubblico ministero è stato sospeso e gli è stato tagliato lo stipendio
      Laureato in Giurisprudenza nel 2010 presso il Centro Universitário Monte Serrat (Unimonte), oggi Universidade São Judas, a Santos, sulla costa di San Paolo, Demétrius ha superato l’esame dell’Ordine degli Avvocati Brasiliani (OAB) l’anno successivo, nel 2011, diventando abile per esercitare la professione. Nello stesso anno, ha iniziato la sua carriera al City Hall of Record .

      Il procuratore generale Gabriela afferma che il profilo di Demétrius è cambiato poco dopo essere stata promossa nel 2019. La vittima riferisce che i due hanno lavorato insieme per quasi 10 anni e, fino al 2018, hanno parlato e sono usciti con la squadra del pubblico ministero (vedi rapporto sotto).

      Da allora, secondo lei, è diventata “antisociale”. “Non ci parlava, non diceva ‘buongiorno’, non salutava per strada, non era collaborativo, non si integrava nel lavoro. Era praticamente impossibile lavorare in gruppo con lui”, ha detto la vittima.

      “Penso che sia capace di tutto”, dice il pubblico ministero aggredito in SP

      “Penso che sia capace di tutto”, dice il pubblico ministero aggredito in SP

      Il personal trainer di una palestra che Demétrius ha frequentato fino al 2019, in Registro , ha preferito non essere identificato, ma ha detto che il pm era un “ragazzo di poche parole”.

      “In palestra entrava in silenzio ed usciva in silenzio. A volte mi salutava, ma non ricordo di averlo visto parlare con altri colleghi”.

      Afferma che il contatto con l’aggressore è stato “superficiale” e cordiale. “Era sempre molto gentile. Mi salutava. A volte si parlava di calcio, ma nel complesso era una persona estremamente tranquilla”.

      Il professionista dell’Educazione Fisica, invece, è rimasto sorpreso quando ha visto il video delle aggressioni. “Non mi aspettavo quel tipo di comportamento da lui. Il contatto superficiale non avevo mai mostrato che avrebbe fatto quello che faceva. Ma un ragazzo molto tranquillo, molto chiuso, non lo so. È molto strano”.

      Decreto carcere
      La giustizia ha decretato la detenzione preventiva dell’avvocato Demétrius Oliveira de Macedo , che ha aggredito la procuratrice generale del Comune di Registro , Gabriela Samadello Monteiro de Barros . La richiesta è stata presentata questo mercoledì pomeriggio (22), al 1° Tribunale penale della città, dal delegato Daniel Vaz Rocha, responsabile del caso.

      Nella richiesta, il delegato ha sottolineato che l’imputato “ha avuto seri problemi di relazione con le donne nell’ambiente di lavoro, e, sulla libertà, espone al pericolo la loro vita e, di conseguenza, l’ordine pubblico” .

      «L’aggressione del procuratore del registro a un collega non resterà impunita. La Polizia Civile ha appena chiesto l’arresto dell’aggressore Demétrius Macedo. Possa la giustizia fare la sua parte e punire ogni codardo che aggredisce una donna”, ha affermato il governatore Rodrigo Garcia (PSDB), che mercoledì mattina (22) ha visitato Peruíbe e São Vicente, entrambe sulla costa di San Paolo.

      Sempre secondo la Polizia Civile, l’indagine avviata per indagare sul caso ha raccolto foto e video dell’aggressione, oltre alle testimonianze del procuratore generale a sostegno della richiesta di custodia cautelare.

      In libertà
      Come riportato da g1 , il delegato Fernando Carvalho Gregório, anche lui del 1° distretto di polizia (DP) del comune, dove si indaga sul caso, ha affermato che l’ aggressore è stato inizialmente rilasciato per “mancanza di flagrante” . Macedo ha ricevuto il rilascio subito dopo la preparazione di un rapporto sull’incidente (BO) presso il sito.

      Cosa si sa sull’aggressività
      1.Chi è la vittima?
      La donna aggredita è Gabriela Samadello Monteiro de Barros, 39 anni. È il procuratore generale del Registro , all’interno di San Paolo, e il procuratore capo dell’aggressore. Gabriela era al lavoro quando è stata aggredita.

      2.Chi è l’aggressore?
      Demétrius Oliveira Macedo, 34 anni, è anche un avvocato del registro . L’autore degli attentati aveva già mostrato comportamenti sospetti ed è stato scortese con un altro dipendente del settore, come denunciato da Gabriela alla polizia civile.

      3.Cosa ha motivato l’aggressione?
      La pm aveva chiesto provvedimenti sull’episodio di maleducazione nei confronti di una dipendente, poiché temeva di lavorare nello stesso ambiente di Macedo e aveva inviato una nota alla Segreteria Amministrativa con una proposta di procedimento amministrativo.

      Lunedì (20) è stata pubblicata sulla Gazzetta Ufficiale del comune la creazione di una commissione per indagare sui fatti. Probabilmente, secondo Gabriela, è stato quello che ha scatenato gli attacchi.

      4. Quali sono i dettagli dell’aggressione?
      Il caso si è svolto lunedì pomeriggio (20), intorno alle 16:50, nell’ufficio del procuratore della città, all’interno del municipio. L’azione filmata da un altro dipendente mostra che Macedo ha tirato pugni e preso a calci la sua collega, che stava lavorando quando è stata sorpresa dall’attacco.

      Secondo il rapporto della polizia (BO), prima l’ha aggredita con un gomito alla testa e ha continuato con pugni in faccia. Il pubblico ministero ha detto che ha cercato di difendersi e ha persino ricevuto l’aiuto di un dipendente, che è stato spinto contro la porta e l’ha picchiata sulla maniglia.

      Libero di continuare l’aggressione, Macedo ha continuato a prendere a pugni e calci, anche con altri due dipendenti che cercavano di contenerlo. Ad un certo punto Gabriela è riuscita a farsi togliere di fronte l’aggressore.

      È anche possibile sentire nel video che offende più volte il pubblico ministero. Non appena hanno sentito le urla, due dipendenti del settore legale si sono recati sul posto e sono riusciti a controllare il pubblico ministero.

      5.Quali sono le dichiarazioni della vittima?
      Gabriela ha dichiarato di temere che Macedo si sarebbe ribellato contro di lei. “Avevo paura, sì. Temevo che succedesse, ma non immaginavo si trattasse di violenza fisica, pensavo fosse un ‘argomento’, un litigio”.

      Il pubblico ministero ha anche affermato di essersi sentita mancata di rispetto di fronte alle aggressioni. “La mia dignità è stata smascherata. Come donna, sono stata irrispettosa, oltre che dipendente pubblica. In breve, è stata una mancanza di rispetto globale nei confronti della mia personalità di donna”, ha detto.

      Ora, Gabriela vuole che Macedo sia perseguito a causa delle aggressioni e delle offese contro di lei.

      6.Cosa ha detto l’aggressore alla polizia?
      Demétrius Oliveira Macedo ha detto alla polizia civile di aver subito molestie morali sul posto di lavoro. “Ha ammesso di aver aggredito la vittima e ha affermato di averlo fatto perché molestato moralmente”, ha detto Fernando Carvalho Gregório, delegato del 1° distretto di polizia del comune, in un’intervista a TV Tribuna, affiliata a Rede Globo.

      7. L’aggressore sarà arrestato?
      L’aggressore del pm è stato ascoltato dalla Polizia Civile e successivamente rilasciato, poiché il delegato responsabile del caso ha ritenuto che non vi fosse alcun atto.

      “Ho capito che non c’era una situazione di flagranza, ma un fatto criminale. Ovviamente, dovrebbe essere debitamente indagato. Pertanto, abbiamo registrato l’evento e abbiamo preso tutte le misure necessarie in quel momento”, ha spiegato Gregorio.

      Il delegato ha anche chiarito che il fatto è analizzato dal Pubblico Ministero (MP) e dalla Magistratura (PJ). “Alla fine di tutto il lavoro, avremo una conclusione delle indagini su un caso, e un’eventuale condanna”, ha sottolineato il funzionario di polizia, il quale ha aggiunto che non è possibile anticipare un risultato senza che siano state svolte le indagini adeguate fuori.

      8. L’aggressore sarà esonerato?
      Come provvedimento immediato per punire l’aggressione, il Comune di Registro ha pubblicato sulla Gazzetta Ufficiale n. 1076, il decreto n. 525/2022, determinando la sospensione preventiva del Macedo.

      Come descritto negli atti ufficiali, il pm sarà sospeso per 30 giorni, senza percepire uno stipendio, a partire dal 21 giugno, data dell’aggressione.

      Secondo la spiegazione del municipio, questo provvedimento rientra nel processo amministrativo che dovrebbe concludersi con il licenziamento di Macedo. “È necessario seguire questo passaggio e le procedure legali affinché la decisione sia presa in modo coerente”, ha chiarito.

      9.Cosa dice la città?
      L’amministrazione comunale, attraverso una nota, ha espresso “il più assoluto e profondo ripudio dei brutali atti di violenza”.

      “Riaffermiamo il nostro impegno per la prevenzione e il contrasto di tutte le forme di violenza, in particolare quelle che perseguitano le donne. I servitori dell’Ufficio del Procuratore Generale Municipale e del Dipartimento degli Affari Legali riceveranno tutto il supporto necessario, compreso il monitoraggio psicologico”, ha scritto.

      L’amministrazione comunale ha detto anche agli altri server: “ricevete il nostro sostegno e sappiate che la pratica della violenza è ripudiata con veemenza e sarà severamente punita”.

      10.Cosa dice l’Associazione nazionale dei procuratori municipali?
      L’Associazione nazionale dei pubblici ministeri municipali (Anpm) ha dichiarato in una nota di essere solidale con la procura municipale e di ripudiare la condotta violenta di Macedo.

      “La vittima è stata aggredita per motivi legati all’esercizio della carica mentre l’aggressore, a quanto pare, ha agito motivato da intento criminoso. L’ANPM ribadisce il proprio impegno a sensibilizzare, prevenire e combattere le molestie nel campo dell’advocacy e tutte le forme di violenza contro le donne”.

      https://g1-globo-com.translate.goog/sp/santos-regiao/noticia/2022/06/22/quem-e-demetrius-oliveira-de-macedo-advogado-que-espancou-procuradora-geral-durante-expediente-em-prefeitura.ghtml?_x_tr_sl=pt&_x_tr_tl=it&_x_tr_hl=pt-BR&_x_tr_pto=wapp

      1. Кто такой Деметриус Оливейра де Маседо, адвокат, избивший генерального прокурора в рабочее время в мэрии
        Агрессора, который также является прокурором, считали человеком немногословным и «асоциальным». Он работал в муниципалитете Регистро во внутренних районах Сан-Паулу с 2011 года.
        Автор g1 Сантос

        22.06.2022 17:38 Обновлено há 22 minutos

        Деметриус Оливейра Маседо напал на коллегу в муниципалитете Регистро во внутренних районах Сан-Паулу – Фото: Репродукция / Социальные сети
        Деметриус Оливейра Маседо напал на коллегу в муниципалитете Регистро во внутренних районах Сан-Паулу – Фото: Репродукция / Социальные сети

        Юрист Деметриус Оливейра де Маседо, 34 лет, которого снимали на видео, избивая 39-летнего генерального прокурора Габриэлу Самаделло Монтейру де Баррос , в мэрии , во внутренней части Сан-Паулу, перед нападениями, окружающие видели его тихим человеком, с «антисоциальный» профиль, но иногда вежливый.

        Смотрите момент штурма на видео ниже.

        На видео запечатлено жестокое избиение прокурора в мэрии Сан-Паулу.

        На видео запечатлено жестокое избиение прокурора в мэрии Сан-Паулу.

        Читайте также:
        ВИДЕО: Избитый в СП прокурор заявил, что агрессор вел себя «асоциально» в рабочей среде
        Прокурор, избитый коллегой, показывает, что она «боялась» его, и говорит, что ее «не уважают как женщину»; ВИДЕО
        Прокурорского агрессора отстранили от работы и урезали зарплату
        Получив юридический диплом в 2010 году в Centro Universitário Monte Serrat (Unimonte), сегодня Universidade São Judas, в Сантосе, на побережье Сан-Паулу, Деметриус сдал экзамен Бразильской коллегии адвокатов (OAB) в следующем году, в 2011 году, став способным заниматься профессией. В том же году начал свою карьеру в мэрии записи .

        Генеральный прокурор Габриэла говорит, что профиль Деметриуса изменился вскоре после ее повышения в 2019 году. Потерпевшая сообщает, что они работали вместе почти 10 лет и до 2018 года общались и встречались с командой прокурора (см. отчет ниже).

        С тех пор, по ее словам, она стала «асоциальной». «Он не разговаривал с нами, не говорил «доброе утро», не здоровался на улице, не сотрудничал, не интегрировался в работу. Работать было практически невозможно. в группе с ним», — рассказала потерпевшая.

        «Я думаю, что он способен на все», — заявил прокурор, подвергшийся нападению в СП

        «Я думаю, что он способен на все», — заявил прокурор, подвергшийся нападению в СП

        Личный тренер спортзала, который Деметриус посещал до 2019 года, в Registro , предпочел не называть его имени, но сказал, что прокурор был «немногословным парнем».

        «В спортзале он молча входил и молча уходил. Иногда он здоровался со мной, но я не помню, чтобы он разговаривал с другими коллегами».

        Она утверждает, что контакт с агрессором был «поверхностным» и сердечным. «Он всегда был очень вежлив. Он здоровался со мной. Иногда мы говорили о футболе, но в целом он был очень тихим человеком».

        Однако специалист по физическому воспитанию был удивлен, когда увидел видео агрессии. «Я не ожидал от него такого поведения. Поверхностный контакт, которого я никогда не показывал, что он будет делать то, что он сделал. Но очень тихий парень, очень закрытый, я не знаю. Это очень странно».

        Постановление о заключении под стражу
        Суд вынес постановление о предварительном задержании адвоката Деметриуса Оливейры де Маседо , который напал на генерального прокурора муниципалитета Регистро Габриэлу Самаделло Монтейру де Баррос . Запрос был представлен в эту среду днем ​​(22) в 1-м уголовном суде города делегатом Даниэлем Вазом Рочей, который отвечает за это дело.

        В запросе делегат указал, что обвиняемый «имеет серьезные проблемы во взаимоотношениях с женщинами в производственной среде, а на свободе подвергает опасности их жизнь, а следовательно, и общественный порядок» .

        «Агрессия прокурора ЗАГСа по отношению к коллеге не останется безнаказанной. Гражданская полиция только что потребовала ареста агрессора Деметриуса Маседо. Пусть правосудие сделает свое дело и накажет любого труса, который нападет на женщину», — сказал губернатор Родриго Гарсия (PSDB), посетивший Перуибе и Сан-Висенте, оба на побережье Сан-Паулу, в эту среду утром (22).

        Также по данным гражданской полиции, расследование, начатое по делу, собрало фотографии и видео агрессии, а также показания генерального прокурора в поддержку ходатайства о предварительном заключении.

        На свободе
        Как сообщает g1 , делегат Фернандо Карвалью Грегорио, также из 1-го полицейского округа (DP) муниципалитета, где расследуется дело, заявил, что агрессор изначально был освобожден за «отсутствие вопиющих обстоятельств» . Маседо получил освобождение вскоре после подготовки отчета об инциденте (БО) на месте происшествия.

        Что известно об агрессии
        1.Кто жертва?
        Женщина, на которую напали, – Габриэла Самаделло Монтейру де Баррос, 39 лет. Она генеральный прокурор регистратуры во внутренних районах Сан-Паулу и главный прокурор агрессора. Габриэла была на работе, когда на нее напали.

        2.Кто агрессор?
        34-летний Деметриус Оливейра Маседо также является юристом , занимающимся регистрационными делами . Виновник нападения уже проявлял подозрительное поведение и был груб с другим сотрудником сектора, о чем Габриэла сообщила в гражданскую полицию.

        3.Что мотивировало агрессию?
        Прокурор потребовал принять меры по эпизоду грубости в отношении сотрудницы, так как она боялась работать в одной среде с Маседо, и направил в Административный секретариат меморандум с предложением о возбуждении административной процедуры.

        В понедельник (20) в Официальном вестнике муниципалитета было опубликовано сообщение о создании комиссии по расследованию фактов. Вероятно, по словам Габриэлы, именно это и спровоцировало приступы.

        4. Каковы подробности агрессии?
        Дело произошло в понедельник днем ​​(20), около 16:50, в городской прокуратуре, в мэрии. Действие, снятое другим сотрудником, показывает, что Маседо наносила удары и пинала свою коллегу, которая работала, когда она была удивлена ​​​​нападением.

        Согласно полицейскому отчету (BO), он сначала напал на нее локтем в голову, а затем продолжил нанесение ударов по лицу. По словам прокурора, она пыталась защищаться и даже получила помощь от сотрудницы, которая толкнула ее в дверь и ударила ее спиной о ручку.

        Свободный для продолжения агрессии, Маседо продолжал бить кулаками и ногами, даже когда двое других сотрудников пытались его сдержать. В какой-то момент Габриэле удалось убраться из-под ног агрессора.

        Также на видео можно услышать, что он несколько раз оскорбляет прокурора. Как только они услышали крики, на место выехали двое сотрудников юридического сектора, которым удалось взять прокурора под контроль.

        5.Каковы показания потерпевшего?
        Габриэла заявила, что опасается, что Маседо восстанет против нее. «Я боялся, да. Я боялся, что это произойдет, но я не представлял, что это будет физическое насилие, я думал, что это «аргумент», спор».

        Прокурор также заявила, что она чувствовала себя неуважительно перед лицом агрессии. «Мое достоинство было раскрыто. Меня как женщину не уважали, как и государственного служащего. Короче говоря, это было глобальное неуважение к моей личности как к женщине», — сказала она.

        Теперь Габриэла хочет, чтобы Маседо был привлечен к ответственности за агрессию и оскорбления против нее.

        6.Что нападавший сказал полиции?
        Деметриус Оливейра Маседо сообщил гражданской полиции, что подвергался моральному преследованию на рабочем месте. «Он признал, что напал на жертву, и утверждал, что сделал это, потому что подвергся моральному преследованию», — сказал Фернандо Карвалью Грегорио, делегат 1-го полицейского округа муниципалитета, в интервью телеканалу Tribuna, связанному с Rede Globo.

        7. Будет ли арестован агрессор?
        Прокурорский агрессор был заслушан гражданской полицией и впоследствии отпущен, так как делегат, ответственный за дело, посчитал, что никакого акта не было.

        «Я понял, что это не вопиющая ситуация, а криминальный факт. Конечно, это должно быть должным образом расследовано. Поэтому мы зарегистрировали происшествие и предприняли все необходимые меры в свое время», — пояснил Грегорио.

        Делегат также уточнил, что данный факт анализируется Государственным министерством (МП) и Судебной властью (СП). «В конце всей работы у нас будет заключение следствия по делу и, в конечном итоге, обвинительный приговор», — подчеркнул представитель полиции, добавив, что без проведения надлежащих расследований невозможно предсказать результат. вне.

        8. Будет ли оправдан агрессор?
        В качестве немедленной меры по наказанию за агрессию муниципалитет Регистро опубликовал в Официальном вестнике № 1076 указ № 525/2022, определяющий превентивное отстранение Маседо.

        Как указано в официальных актах, прокурор будет отстранен от должности на 30 дней без выплаты заработной платы, начиная с 21 июня, даты нападения.

        Согласно объяснению мэрии, эта мера является частью административного процесса, который должен закончиться увольнением Маседо. «Необходимо следовать этому шагу и юридическим процедурам, чтобы решение принималось последовательно», — пояснил он.

        9.Что говорит город?
        Муниципальная администрация в ноте выразила «самое абсолютное и глубокое неприятие жестоких актов насилия».

        «Мы подтверждаем нашу приверженность предотвращению и противодействию всем формам насилия, особенно тем, которые становятся жертвами женщин. Серверы городской прокуратуры и Департамента по правовым вопросам получат всю необходимую поддержку, включая психологическое наблюдение», — написал он.

        Муниципальная администрация также сообщила другим серверам: «Примите нашу поддержку и знайте, что практика насилия категорически отвергается и будет строго наказана».

        10.Что говорит Национальная ассоциация муниципальных прокуроров?
        Национальная ассоциация муниципальных прокуроров (ANPM) заявила в своем заявлении, что сочувствует муниципальному прокурору и осуждает насильственные действия Маседо.

        «Потерпевший подвергся нападению по причинам, связанным с осуществлением служебного положения, в то время как агрессор, по-видимому, действовал, руководствуясь преступным умыслом. ANPM подтверждает свою приверженность повышению осведомленности, предотвращению и борьбе с домогательствами в сфере защиты интересов и всеми формами насилия в отношении женщин».

        https://g1-globo-com.translate.goog/sp/santos-regiao/noticia/2022/06/22/quem-e-demetrius-oliveira-de-macedo-advogado-que-espancou-procuradora-geral-durante-expediente-em-prefeitura.ghtml?_x_tr_sl=pt&_x_tr_tl=ru&_x_tr_hl=pt-BR&_x_tr_pto=wapp

        谁是 Demétrius Oliveira de Macedo,在市政厅办公时间内殴打司法部长的律师
        Aggressor 也是一名检察官,他被视为寡言和“反社会”的人。自 2011 年以来,他在圣保罗内陆的 Registro 市工作。
        由 g1 桑托斯

        2022 年 6 月 22 日 17:38 更新 há 22 minutos

        Demétrius Oliveira Macedo agrediu colega de trabalho na Prefeitura de Registro, no interior de São Paulo — Foto: Reprodução/Redes Sociais
        Demétrius Oliveira Macedo 在圣保罗内陆的 Registro 市袭击了一名同事 – 照片:Reproduction / Social Networks

        34 岁的律师 Demétrius Oliveira de Macedo 被拍到在袭击发生前在圣保罗内陆市政厅殴打 39 岁的司法部长加布里埃拉·萨马德洛·蒙泰罗·德巴罗斯,在他周围的人看来,他是一个安静的人, “反社会”的个人资料,但有时很有礼貌。

        在下面的视频中观看袭击的时刻。

        视频捕捉到检察官在圣保罗市政厅遭到残酷殴打

        视频捕捉到检察官在圣保罗市政厅遭到残酷殴打

        也读:
        视频:在 SP 中被殴打的检察官说攻击者在工作环境中是“反社会的”
        被同事殴打的检察官透露她“害怕”他,并说她“作为一个女人不被尊重”;视频
        检察官的侵略者被停职并减薪
        Demétrius 于 2010 年毕业于 Centro Universitário Monte Serrat (Unimonte),今天在圣保罗海岸桑托斯的圣犹大大学 (Universidade São Judas) 于次年,即 2011 年通过了巴西律师协会 (OAB) 的考试,能够去实践这个专业。同年,他在市政厅开始了他的职业生涯。

        总检察长加布里埃拉说,德米特里乌斯的形象在 2019 年晋升后不久就发生了变化。受害者报告说,两人一起工作了近 10 年,直到 2018 年,与检察官团队交谈并外出(见下面的报告)。

        从那以后,据她说,她变得“反社会”。“他没有和我们说话,他没有说’早上好’,他没有在街上打招呼,他没有合作,他没有融入工作。几乎不可能工作和他在一起”,受害者说。

        “我认为他无所不能”,检察官在 SP 遭到袭击时说

        “我认为他无所不能”,检察官在 SP 遭到袭击时说

        Demétrius 直到 2019 年在Registro参加的一家健身房的私人教练不愿透露姓名,但表示检察官是一个“沉默寡言的人”。

        “在健身房,他默默地进,默默地离开。有时他和我打招呼,但我不记得见过他和其他同事说话”。

        她声称与侵略者的接触是“肤浅的”和亲切的。“他总是很有礼貌。他过去常常和我打招呼。有时我们会谈论足球,但总的来说,他是一个非常安静的人。”

        然而,当体育专业人士看到攻击视频时,他感到很惊讶。“我没想到他会有这种行为,我从来没有表面上的接触表明他会做他所做的事情。但是一个非常安静的人,非常封闭,我不知道。这很奇怪。”

        监禁法令
        法官下令预防性拘留律师 Demétrius Oliveira de Macedo,他袭击了Registro市的总检察长Gabriela Samadello Monteiro de Barros。负责此案的代表丹尼尔·瓦兹·罗查(Daniel Vaz Rocha)于本周三下午(22 日)在该市第一刑事法院提出了该请求。

        该代表在请求中指出,被告“在工作环境中与女性存在严重的关系问题,而且,在自由方面,他将她们的生命置于危险之中,从而影响公共秩序”。

        “登记处律师对同事的侵略不会不受惩罚。民警刚刚要求逮捕侵略者德米特里乌斯·马塞多。愿正义尽自己的一份力量,惩罚任何攻击妇女的懦夫,”本周三上午 (22) 访问了圣保罗海岸的秘鲁和圣维森特的州长罗德里戈·加西亚 (PSDB) 说。

        另据民警称,为调查此案而展开的调查收集了侵略的照片和视频,以及司法部长的证词,以支持预防性拘留的请求。

        在自由中
        正如g1报道的那样,代表费尔南多·卡瓦略·格雷戈里奥 (Fernando Carvalho Gregório) 也来自该市调查此案的第一警察区 (DP),他声称袭击者最初因“缺乏公然”而被释放。Macedo 在现场准备好事故报告 (BO) 后不久就收到了释放。

        关于侵略的知识
        1.谁是受害者?
        被袭击的女子是 39 岁的 Gabriela Samadello Monteiro de Barros。她是圣保罗内地的书记官处总检察长,也是侵略者的首席检察官。加布里埃拉遭到袭击时正在工作。

        2.谁是侵略者?
        34 岁的 Demétrius Oliveira Macedo 也是一名注册律师。正如加布里埃拉向民警报告的那样,袭击的肇事者已经表现出可疑行为,并且对该部门的另一名员工无礼。

        3.是什么激发了侵略?
        检察官要求对一名员工的粗鲁行为采取行动,因为她害怕在与马塞多相同的环境中工作,并向行政秘书处发送了一份备忘录,其中提出了行政程序的建议。

        周一(20 日),成立了一个调查事实的委员会在市政府公报上公布。根据加布里埃拉的说法,这可能是引发袭击的原因。

        4.侵略的细节是什么?
        此案于周一下午(20 日)下午 4 点 50 分左右在市政厅内的市检察官办公室进行。另一名员工拍摄的动作显示,马塞多拳打脚踢她的同事,当她对这次袭击感到惊讶时,她正在工作。

        根据警方报告(BO),他首先用肘部攻击她的头部,然后继续用拳头打她的脸。检察官说,她试图为自己辩护,甚至还得到了一名员工的帮助,该员工被推到门上,并在把手上击中了她。

        自由继续侵略,马塞多继续拳打脚踢,即使有另外两名员工试图遏制他。有一次,加布里埃拉设法从攻击者的前面被移走了。

        也有可能在视频中听到他多次得罪检察官。一听到尖叫声,两名法律部门的员工就赶到现场,并设法控制了检察官。

        5.受害人的陈述是什么?
        加布里埃拉说她担心马塞多会反抗她。“我很害怕,是的。我害怕这会发生,但我没想到会是身体暴力,我认为这是一个’争论’,一个争论”。

        检察官还表示,面对这些侵略,她感到不尊重。“我的尊严暴露无遗。作为一名女性,我受到了不尊重,同时也是一名公务员。简而言之,这是对我作为女性的个性的全球不尊重,”她说。

        现在,加布里埃拉希望马塞多因对她的侵略和冒犯而受到起诉。

        6.袭击者对警察说了什么?
        Demétrius Oliveira Macedo 告诉民警,他在工作场所遭受了道德骚扰。“他承认他袭击了受害者,并声称他这样做是因为他在道德上受到骚扰,”该市第一警区代表费尔南多·卡瓦略·格雷戈里奥(Fernando Carvalho Gregório)在接受 Rede Globo 附属电视台 TV Tribuna 采访时说。

        7. 施暴者会被逮捕吗?
        由于负责此案的代表认为没有作为,公诉人的侵略者被民警听取并随后被释放。

        格雷戈里奥解释说:“我知道这不是公然的情况,而是犯罪事实。当然,应该对其进行适当的调查。因此,我们当时登记了这一事件并采取了所有必要的措施”。

        该代表还澄清说,公共部(MP)和司法机构(PJ)对这一事实进行了分析。“在所有工作结束时,我们将对案件的调查做出结论,并最终定罪”,这位警官强调说,他补充说,如果没有进行适当的调查,就不可能预测结果出去。

        8. 施暴者会被赦免吗?
        作为惩罚侵略的一项直接措施,登记处市政府在第 1076 号官方公报上发布了第 525/2022 号法令,确定了马塞多的预防性暂停。

        如官方行为所述,从袭击之日 6 月 21 日起,检察官将被停职 30 天,不领取工资。

        根据市政厅的解释,这项措施是行政程序的一部分,应该以马塞多的解职而告终。他澄清说:“有必要遵循这一步骤和法律程序,以便以一致的方式做出决定”。

        9.这座城市怎么说?
        市政当局通过一份说明,表达了“对残暴暴力行为的最绝对、最深刻的否定”。

        他写道:“我们重申我们致力于预防和对抗一切形式的暴力,特别是那些伤害妇女的暴力。市总检察长办公室和法律事务部的服务人员将得到一切必要的支持,包括心理监测。”

        市政当局还告诉其他服务器:“接受我们的支持,并知道暴力行为将受到强烈反对,并将受到严厉惩罚”。

        10.全国市政检察官协会怎么说?
        全国市政检察官协会(ANPM)在一份声明中表示,它同情市政检察官并否认马塞多的暴力行为。

        “受害者因行使职务相关的原因而受到攻击,而攻击者似乎是出于犯罪意图而采取行动。ANPM 重申其致力于在宣传和一切形式的暴力侵害妇女行为领域提高认识、预防和打击骚扰”。

        https://g1-globo-com.translate.goog/sp/santos-regiao/noticia/2022/06/22/quem-e-demetrius-oliveira-de-macedo-advogado-que-espancou-procuradora-geral-durante-expediente-em-prefeitura.ghtml?_x_tr_sl=pt&_x_tr_tl=zh-CN&_x_tr_hl=pt-BR&_x_tr_pto=wapp

        من هو ديميتريوس أوليفيرا دي ماسيدو ، المحامي الذي ضرب النائب العام خلال ساعات العمل في دار البلدية
        المعتدي ، وهو أيضًا المدعي العام ، كان يُنظر إليه على أنه رجل قليل الكلام و “غير اجتماعي”. كان يعمل في بلدية Registro ، في المناطق الداخلية من ساو باولو ، منذ عام 2011.
        بواسطة g1 سانتوس

        06/22/2022 17:38 محدث منذ 23 دقيقة

        Demétrius Oliveira Macedo agrediu colega de trabalho na Prefeitura de Registro, no interior de São Paulo — Foto: Reprodução/Redes Sociais
        اعتدى ديميتريوس أوليفيرا ماسيدو على زميل في العمل في بلدية ريجيسترو ، في المناطق الداخلية من ساو باولو – الصورة: الاستنساخ / الشبكات الاجتماعية

        المحامي ديميتريوس أوليفيرا دي ماسيدو ، 34 عامًا ، الذي تم تصويره وهو يضرب المدعي العام غابرييلا ساماديلو مونتيرو دي باروس ، 39 عامًا ، في قاعة المدينة ، داخل ساو باولو ، قبل الهجمات ، كان ينظر إليه من حوله على أنه شخص هادئ ، مع الملف الشخصي “المعادي للمجتمع” ، ولكن في بعض الأحيان مهذبا.

        شاهد لحظة الهجوم في الفيديو أدناه.

        يصور مقطع فيديو تعرض المدعي العام لاعتداء وحشي في قاعة المدينة في ساو باولو

        يصور مقطع فيديو تعرض المدعي العام لاعتداء وحشي في قاعة المدينة في ساو باولو

        اقرأ أيضا:
        فيديو: المدعي العام الذي تعرض للضرب في SP يقول أن المعتدي كان “غير اجتماعي” في بيئة العمل
        كشفت المدعية التي تعرضت للضرب من قبل زميل لها أنها كانت “خائفة” منه وتقول إنها “لا تحترم كامرأة” ؛ فيديو
        تم إيقاف المعتدي على المدعي العام وخفض راتبه
        تخرج في القانون في 2010 في Centro Universitário Monte Serrat (Unimonte) ، اليوم جامعة ساو جوداس ، في سانتوس ، على ساحل ساو باولو ، اجتاز ديميتريوس امتحان نقابة المحامين البرازيليين (OAB) في العام التالي ، في عام 2011 ، وأصبح قادرًا لمزاولة المهنة. في نفس العام ، بدأ حياته المهنية في City Hall of Record .

        تقول المدعية العامة غابرييلا إن ملف تعريف ديميتريوس قد تغير بعد فترة وجيزة من ترقيتها في عام 2019. وأفادت الضحية أن الاثنين عملا معًا لمدة 10 سنوات تقريبًا ، وحتى عام 2018 ، تحدثا وخرجا مع فريق المدعي العام (انظر التقرير أدناه).

        منذ ذلك الحين ، حسب قولها ، أصبحت “غير اجتماعية”. “لم يتحدث إلينا ، ولم يقل” صباح الخير “، ولم يقل مرحبًا في الشارع ، ولم يكن متعاونًا ، ولم يندمج في العمل. كان من المستحيل عمليًا العمل في مجموعة معه “، قال الضحية.

        “أعتقد أنه قادر على أي شيء” ، يقول المدعي العام الذي تعرض للاعتداء في SP

        “أعتقد أنه قادر على أي شيء” ، يقول المدعي العام الذي تعرض للاعتداء في SP

        المدرب الشخصي في صالة الألعاب الرياضية التي حضرها ديميتريوس حتى عام 2019 ، في ريجيسترو ، فضل عدم الكشف عن هويته ، لكنه قال إن المدعي العام كان “رجل قليل الكلام”.

        “في صالة الألعاب الرياضية ، دخل بصمت وغادر بصمت. في بعض الأحيان كان يحييني ، لكنني لا أتذكر رؤيته يتحدث إلى زملاء آخرين”.

        وهي تدعي أن الاتصال بالمعتدي كان “سطحيًا” ووديًا. “كان دائمًا مهذبًا للغاية. كان يرحب بي. أحيانًا كنا نتحدث عن كرة القدم ، لكنه كان شخصًا هادئًا للغاية بشكل عام.”

        ومع ذلك ، تفاجأ محترف التربية البدنية عندما شاهد فيديو الاعتداءات. “لم أتوقع هذا النوع من السلوك منه. الاتصال السطحي الذي لم أظهره أبدًا أنه سيفعل ما فعله. لكن رجلًا هادئًا للغاية ، ومنغلق جدًا ، لا أعرف. إنه أمر غريب جدًا.”

        صدر حكم بالسجن
        أصدر القاضي قرارًا بالاحتجاز الوقائي للمحامي ديميتريوس أوليفيرا دي ماسيدو ، الذي هاجم المدعية العامة لبلدية ريجيسترو ، غابرييلا ساماديلو مونتيرو دي باروس . تم تقديم الطلب بعد ظهر يوم الأربعاء (22) ، في المحكمة الجنائية الأولى للمدينة ، من قبل المندوب دانييل فاز روشا ، المسؤول عن القضية.

        وأشار المندوب في الطلب إلى أن المتهم “يعاني من مشاكل جدية في العلاقة مع النساء في بيئة العمل ، ومن حيث الحرية يعرض حياتهن للخطر ، وبالتالي النظام العام” .

        “إن اعتداء محامي التسجيل على زميل له لن يمر دون عقاب. طلبت الشرطة المدنية للتو إلقاء القبض على المعتدي ديميتريوس ماسيدو. قال الحاكم رودريجو غارسيا (PSDB) ، الذي زار بيرويبي وساو فيسينتي ، وكلاهما على ساحل ساو باولو ، صباح الأربعاء (22).

        وبحسب الشرطة المدنية ، فإن التحقيق الذي بدأ للتحقيق في القضية جمع صورًا ومقاطع فيديو للعدوان ، بالإضافة إلى شهادات النائب العام لدعم طلب الحبس الاحتياطي.

        في الحرية
        كما ذكرت g1 ، ادعى المندوب فرناندو كارفالهو غريغوريو ، وهو أيضًا من منطقة الشرطة الأولى بالبلدية ، حيث يتم التحقيق في القضية ، أنه تم إطلاق سراح المعتدي في البداية بسبب “عدم التلبس” . تلقى ماسيدو الإفراج بعد وقت قصير من إعداد تقرير الحادث (BO) في الموقع.

        ما هو معروف عن العدوان
        1- من الضحية؟
        المرأة التي تعرضت للهجوم هي غابرييلا ساماديلو مونتيرو دي باروس ، 39 عامًا. تشغل منصب النائب العام في قلم المحكمة في المناطق الداخلية من ساو باولو ، والمدعي العام للمعتدي. كانت غابرييلا في العمل عندما تعرضت للاعتداء.

        2- من هو المعتدي؟
        ديميتريوس أوليفيرا ماسيدو ، 34 عامًا ، هو أيضًا محامي تسجيل . وكان منفذ الهجمات قد أظهر بالفعل سلوكًا مريبًا وكان فظًا مع موظف آخر في القطاع ، كما أبلغت غابرييلا الشرطة المدنية.

        3- ما الدافع وراء العدوان؟
        وقد طالب المدعي العام باتخاذ إجراء بشأن حادثة الوقاحة ضد موظفة ، لأنها كانت تخشى العمل في نفس بيئة ماسيدو وأرسلت مذكرة إلى الأمانة الإدارية تتضمن اقتراحًا بإجراء إداري.

        ونشرت الجريدة الرسمية للبلدية ، اليوم الاثنين (20) ، تشكيل هيئة التحقيق في الوقائع. على الأرجح ، وفقًا لغابرييلا ، كان هذا هو سبب الهجمات.

        4- ما هي تفاصيل العدوان؟
        ووقعت القضية بعد ظهر يوم الاثنين (20) ، حوالي الساعة 4:50 مساءً ، في مكتب محامي المدينة ، داخل مبنى البلدية. يظهر العمل الذي صورته موظفة أخرى أن ماسيدو ألقت اللكمات وركلت زميلتها التي كانت تعمل عندما فوجئت بالهجوم.

        وطبقاً لتقرير الشرطة (BO) ، فقد هاجمها أولاً بكوعه في الرأس واستمر باللكمات في الوجه. قالت المدعية إنها حاولت الدفاع عن نفسها وتلقت مساعدة من موظفة دفعت باتجاه الباب وضربها على المقبض على ظهرها.

        حر في مواصلة العدوان ، واصل ماسيدو اللكم والركل ، حتى مع محاولة اثنين من الموظفين الآخرين احتوائه. في مرحلة ما ، تمكنت غابرييلا من إبعادها عن مقدمة المعتدي.

        من الممكن أيضًا أن نسمع في الفيديو أنه يسيء للمدعي عدة مرات. بمجرد سماع الصراخ ، ذهب موظفان من القطاع القانوني إلى مكان الحادث وتمكنا من السيطرة على المدعي العام.

        5. ما هي أقوال الضحية؟
        صرحت غابرييلا بأنها تخشى ثورة ماسيدو ضدها. “كنت خائفة ، نعم. كنت أخشى أن يحدث هذا ، لكنني لم أتخيل أنه سيكون عنفًا جسديًا ، اعتقدت أنه كان ‘حجة’ ، حجة”.

        كما ذكرت المدعية أنها شعرت بعدم الاحترام في مواجهة الاعتداءات. “تم الكشف عن كرامتي. بصفتي امرأة ، كنت غير محترمة ، وكذلك موظفة عامة. باختصار ، لقد كان عدم احترام عالمي لشخصيتي كامرأة “.

        الآن ، تريد غابرييلا محاكمة ماسيدو نتيجة الاعتداءات والجرائم ضدها.

        6. ماذا قال المهاجم للشرطة؟
        أخبر ديميتريوس أوليفيرا ماسيدو الشرطة المدنية أنه تعرض لمضايقات أخلاقية في مكان العمل. قال فرناندو كارفالو جريجوريو ، مندوب منطقة الشرطة الأولى في البلدية ، في مقابلة مع تلفزيون تريبونا ، المنتسب إلى Rede Globo: “لقد اعترف بأنه اعتدى على الضحية وادعى أنه فعل ذلك لأنه تعرض للمضايقة الأخلاقية”.

        7. هل يعتقل المعتدي؟
        استمعت الشرطة المدنية إلى المدعي العام المعتدي وتم الإفراج عنه بعد ذلك ، حيث اعتبر المندوب المسؤول عن القضية أنه لم يكن هناك فعل.

        وأوضح غريغوريو: “لقد فهمت أنه لم يكن هناك وضع صارخ ، بل حقيقة جنائية. بالطبع ، يجب التحقيق فيها على النحو الواجب. لذلك ، سجلنا الواقعة واتخذنا جميع الخطوات اللازمة في ذلك الوقت”.

        وأوضح المندوب أيضًا أنه تم تحليل الحقيقة من قبل النيابة العامة (MP) والسلطة القضائية (PJ). وشدد المسؤول بالشرطة على أنه “في نهاية كل العمل ، سننتهي من التحقيقات في قضية ما ، وإدانة نهائية” ، مضيفًا أنه لم يكن من الممكن توقع نتيجة دون إجراء التحقيقات المناسبة. خارج.

        8. هل يبرأ المعتدي؟
        كإجراء فوري لمعاقبة العدوان ، نشرت بلدية ريجيسترو في الجريدة الرسمية العدد 1076 ، المرسوم رقم 525/2022 ، الذي يحدد الوقف الوقائي لمايدو.

        كما ورد في الإجراءات الرسمية ، سيتم إيقاف المدعي العام لمدة 30 يومًا ، دون الحصول على راتب ، اعتبارًا من 21 يونيو ، تاريخ الاعتداء.

        وفقًا لشرح مجلس المدينة ، يعد هذا الإجراء جزءًا من العملية الإدارية التي يجب أن تنتهي بإقالة ماسيدو. وأوضح أنه “من الضروري اتباع هذه الخطوة والإجراءات القانونية حتى يتم اتخاذ القرار بشكل متسق”.

        9- ماذا تقول المدينة؟
        وأعربت إدارة البلدية ، من خلال مذكرة ، عن “نبذ مطلق وعميق لأعمال العنف الوحشية”.

        وكتب “نؤكد من جديد التزامنا بمنع جميع أشكال العنف ومواجهتها ، لا سيما تلك التي تقع ضحية للنساء. وسيتلقى موظفو مكتب المدعي العام البلدي وإدارة الشؤون القانونية كل الدعم اللازم ، بما في ذلك المراقبة النفسية”.

        كما قالت إدارة البلدية للخوادم الأخرى: “احصلوا على دعمنا واعلموا أن ممارسة العنف مرفوضة بشدة وسيعاقب عليها بشدة”.

        10. ماذا تقول الرابطة الوطنية للمدعين العامين في البلديات؟
        ذكرت الرابطة الوطنية للمدعين العامين البلديين (ANPM) في بيان أنها تتعاطف مع المدعي العام للبلدية وتتنصل من سلوك ماسيدو العنيف.

        “الضحية هوجمت لأسباب مرتبطة بممارسة الموقف بينما المعتدي ، على ما يبدو ، تصرف بدافع نية إجرامية. تؤكد ANPM من جديد التزامها بزيادة الوعي ومنع ومكافحة التحرش في مجال المناصرة وجميع أشكال العنف ضد المرأة “.

        https://g1-globo-com.translate.goog/sp/santos-regiao/noticia/2022/06/22/quem-e-demetrius-oliveira-de-macedo-advogado-que-espancou-procuradora-geral-durante-expediente-em-prefeitura.ghtml?_x_tr_sl=pt&_x_tr_tl=ar&_x_tr_hl=pt-BR&_x_tr_pto=wapp

  2. Anti-Gaming Arguments:

    “Stop pretending you can lead a country.”
    “Stop pretending you can be a leader of something.”
    “Stop pretending you can lead a company.”
    “Stop pretending you can create a company.”
    “Stop pretending you can manage a company.”
    “Stop pretending you can lead a city.”
    “Stop pretending you can be a soldier.”
    “Stop pretending you can fight in a war.”
    “Stop pretending you can kill people.”
    “Stop pretending you can kill gods.”
    “Stop pretending you can kill aliens.”
    “Stop pretending you can kill supernatural beings.”
    “Stop pretending you can kill divine beings.”
    “Stop pretending you can kill spiritual beings.”
    “Stop pretending you can manage something.”
    “Stop pretending you can be a scientist.”
    “Stop pretending you can survive somewhere.”
    “Stop pretending you can be a “god”.”
    “Stop pretending you can be a “demigod”.”
    “Stop pretending you can be a cult leader.”
    “Stop pretending you can commit war crimes.”
    “Stop pretending you can be a nazi.”
    “Stop pretending you can be a fascist.”
    “Stop pretending you can be a tankie.”
    “Stop pretending you can be a capitalist.”

    Make your own “stop pretending you can…” and your own “stop pretending you are.

    Thanks to my friend Game2Winter for I be able to create such beautiful thing.Argumentos anti-jogos:

    “Pare de fingir que você pode liderar um país.”
    “Pare de fingir que você pode ser o líder de alguma coisa.”
    “Pare de fingir que você pode liderar uma empresa.”
    “Pare de fingir que você pode criar uma empresa.”
    “Pare de fingir que você pode gerenciar uma empresa.”
    “Pare de fingir que você pode liderar uma cidade.”
    “Pare de fingir que você pode ser um soldado.”
    “Pare de fingir que você pode lutar em uma guerra.”
    “Pare de fingir que você pode matar pessoas.”
    “Pare de fingir que você pode matar deuses.”
    “Pare de fingir que você pode matar alienígenas.”
    “Pare de fingir que você pode matar seres sobrenaturais.”
    “Pare de fingir que você pode matar seres divinos.”
    “Pare de fingir que você pode matar seres espirituais.”
    “Pare de fingir que você pode gerenciar alguma coisa.”
    “Pare de fingir que você pode ser um cientista.”
    “Pare de fingir que você pode sobreviver em algum lugar.”
    “Pare de fingir que você pode ser um “deus”.”
    “Pare de fingir que você pode ser um “semideus”.”
    “Pare de fingir que você pode ser um líder de culto.”
    “Pare de fingir que você pode cometer crimes de guerra.”
    “Pare de fingir que você pode ser um nazista.”
    “Pare de fingir que você pode ser um fascista.”
    “Pare de fingir que você pode ser um tankie.”
    “Pare de fingir que você pode ser um capitalista.”

    Faça o seu próprio “pare de fingir que pode…” e o seu próprio “pare de fingir que você é”.

    Obrigado ao meu amigo Game2Winter por poder criar uma coisa tão linda.

    Argumentos contra el juego:

    “Deja de fingir que puedes liderar un país”.
    “Deja de fingir que puedes ser el líder de algo”.
    “Deja de fingir que puedes liderar una empresa”.
    “Deja de fingir que puedes crear una empresa”.
    “Deja de fingir que puedes dirigir una empresa”.
    “Deja de fingir que puedes liderar una ciudad”.
    “Deja de fingir que puedes ser un soldado”.
    “Deja de fingir que puedes pelear en una guerra”.
    “Deja de fingir que puedes matar gente”.
    “Deja de fingir que puedes matar dioses”.
    “Deja de fingir que puedes matar extraterrestres”.
    “Deja de pretender que puedes matar seres sobrenaturales”.
    “Deja de fingir que puedes matar seres divinos”.
    “Deja de fingir que puedes matar seres espirituales”.
    “Deja de fingir que puedes manejar algo”.
    “Deja de pretender que puedes ser un científico”.
    “Deja de fingir que puedes sobrevivir en algún lugar”.
    “Deja de fingir que puedes ser un ‘dios'”.
    “Deja de fingir que puedes ser un ‘semidiós'”.
    “Deja de fingir que puedes ser el líder de una secta”.
    “Deja de fingir que puedes cometer crímenes de guerra”.
    “Deja de pretender que puedes ser un nazi”.
    “Deja de pretender que puedes ser un fascista”.
    “Deja de fingir que puedes ser un tankie”.
    “Deja de pretender que puedes ser un capitalista”.

    Haz tu propio “deja de fingir que puedes…” y tu propio “deja de fingir que eres”.

    Gracias a mi amigo Game2Winter por poder crear algo tan hermoso.

    Arguments anti-jeu :

    “Arrêtez de prétendre que vous pouvez diriger un pays.”
    “Arrêtez de prétendre que vous pouvez être le leader de quelque chose.”
    “Arrêtez de prétendre que vous pouvez diriger une entreprise.”
    “Arrêtez de prétendre que vous pouvez créer une entreprise.”
    “Arrêtez de prétendre que vous pouvez gérer une entreprise.”
    “Arrête de prétendre que tu peux diriger une ville.”
    “Arrête de prétendre que tu peux être un soldat.”
    “Arrête de prétendre que tu peux combattre dans une guerre.”
    “Arrête de prétendre que tu peux tuer des gens.”
    “Arrête de prétendre que tu peux tuer des dieux.”
    “Arrête de prétendre que tu peux tuer des extraterrestres.”
    “Arrête de prétendre que tu peux tuer des êtres surnaturels.”
    “Arrête de prétendre que tu peux tuer des êtres divins.”
    “Arrête de prétendre que tu peux tuer des êtres spirituels.”
    “Arrête de prétendre que tu peux gérer quelque chose.”
    “Arrête de prétendre que tu peux être un scientifique.”
    “Arrête de prétendre que tu peux survivre quelque part.”
    “Arrête de prétendre que tu peux être un “dieu”.”
    “Arrête de prétendre que tu peux être un “demi-dieu”.”
    “Arrête de prétendre que tu peux être un chef de secte.”
    “Arrêtez de prétendre que vous pouvez commettre des crimes de guerre.”
    “Arrête de prétendre que tu peux être un nazi.”
    “Arrête de prétendre que tu peux être un fasciste.”
    “Arrête de prétendre que tu peux être un tankiste.”
    “Arrête de prétendre que tu peux être un capitaliste.”

    Créez votre propre « arrête de prétendre que tu peux… » et ton propre « arrête de faire semblant que tu l’es ».

    Merci à mon ami Game2Winter pour avoir pu créer de si belles choses.

    Anti-Gaming-Argumente:

    „Hör auf, so zu tun, als könntest du ein Land führen.“
    „Hör auf, so zu tun, als könntest du ein Anführer von etwas sein.“
    „Hören Sie auf, so zu tun, als könnten Sie ein Unternehmen führen.“
    „Hören Sie auf, so zu tun, als könnten Sie ein Unternehmen gründen.“
    “Hören Sie auf, so zu tun, als könnten Sie ein Unternehmen leiten.”
    “Hör auf so zu tun, als könntest du eine Stadt führen.”
    “Hör auf so zu tun, als ob du ein Soldat sein könntest.”
    “Hör auf so zu tun, als ob du in einem Krieg kämpfen könntest.”
    “Hör auf so zu tun, als könntest du Menschen töten.”
    “Hör auf so zu tun, als könntest du Götter töten.”
    “Hör auf so zu tun, als könntest du Aliens töten.”
    “Hör auf so zu tun, als könntest du übernatürliche Wesen töten.”
    “Hör auf so zu tun, als könntest du göttliche Wesen töten.”
    “Hör auf so zu tun, als könntest du spirituelle Wesen töten.”
    “Hör auf so zu tun, als könntest du etwas regeln.”
    “Hör auf, so zu tun, als könntest du ein Wissenschaftler sein.”
    “Hör auf so zu tun, als könntest du irgendwo überleben.”
    “Hör auf so zu tun, als ob du ein “Gott” sein könntest.”
    „Hör auf, so zu tun, als könntest du ein ‚Halbgott‘ sein.“
    “Hör auf so zu tun, als ob du ein Kultführer sein könntest.”
    “Hören Sie auf, so zu tun, als könnten Sie Kriegsverbrechen begehen.”
    “Hör auf so zu tun, als ob du ein Nazi sein könntest.”
    “Hör auf, so zu tun, als ob du ein Faschist sein könntest.”
    “Hör auf so zu tun, als ob du ein Tankie sein könntest.”
    “Hör auf so zu tun, als ob du ein Kapitalist sein könntest.”

    Machen Sie Ihr eigenes „Hör auf, so zu tun, als könnten Sie …“ und Ihr eigenes „Hör auf, so zu tun, als wären Sie es.

    Danke an meinen Freund Game2Winter, dass ich so schöne Dinge erschaffen kann.

    Argumenten tegen gamen:

    “Stop met te doen alsof je een land kunt leiden.”
    “Stop met te doen alsof je ergens een leider van kunt zijn.”
    “Stop met te doen alsof je een bedrijf kunt leiden.”
    “Stop met te doen alsof je een bedrijf kunt oprichten.”
    “Stop met te doen alsof je een bedrijf kunt leiden.”
    ‘Stop met te doen alsof je een stad kunt leiden.’
    “Stop met te doen alsof je een soldaat kunt zijn.”
    “Stop met te doen alsof je in een oorlog kunt vechten.”
    “Stop met te doen alsof je mensen kunt doden.”
    ‘Stop met te doen alsof je goden kunt doden.’
    “Stop met te doen alsof je buitenaardse wezens kunt doden.”
    “Stop met te doen alsof je bovennatuurlijke wezens kunt doden.”
    “Stop met te doen alsof je goddelijke wezens kunt doden.”
    “Stop met te doen alsof je spirituele wezens kunt doden.”
    “Stop met te doen alsof je iets aankunt.”
    “Stop met te doen alsof je een wetenschapper kunt zijn.”
    “Stop met te doen alsof je ergens kunt overleven.”
    “Stop met te doen alsof je een “god” kunt zijn.”
    “Stop met te doen alsof je een “halfgod” kunt zijn.”
    “Stop met te doen alsof je een sekteleider kunt zijn.”
    “Stop met te doen alsof je oorlogsmisdaden kunt plegen.”
    “Stop met te doen alsof je een nazi kunt zijn.”
    “Stop met te doen alsof je een fascist kunt zijn.”
    “Stop met te doen alsof je een tankie kunt zijn.”
    “Stop met te doen alsof je een kapitalist kunt zijn.”

    Maak je eigen “stop met doen alsof je het kunt…” en je eigen “stop met doen alsof je het bent.

    Dank aan mijn vriend Game2Winter dat ik zoiets moois kan maken.

    Argomenti anti-gioco:

    “Smettila di fingere di poter guidare un paese.”
    “Smettila di fingere di poter essere il leader di qualcosa.”
    “Smettila di fingere di poter guidare un’azienda.”
    “Smettila di fingere di poter creare un’azienda.”
    “Smettila di fingere di poter gestire un’azienda.”
    “Smettila di fingere di poter guidare una città.”
    “Smettila di fingere di poter essere un soldato.”
    “Smettila di fingere di poter combattere in una guerra.”
    “Smettila di fingere di poter uccidere le persone.”
    “Smettila di fingere di poter uccidere gli dei.”
    “Smettila di fingere di poter uccidere gli alieni.”
    “Smettila di fingere di poter uccidere esseri soprannaturali.”
    “Smettila di fingere di poter uccidere esseri divini.”
    “Smettila di fingere di poter uccidere esseri spirituali.”
    “Smettila di fingere di poter gestire qualcosa.”
    “Smettila di fingere di poter essere uno scienziato.”
    “Smettila di fingere di poter sopravvivere da qualche parte.”
    “Smettila di fingere di poter essere un “dio”.”
    “Smettila di fingere di poter essere un “semidio”.”
    “Smettila di fingere di poter essere un leader di una setta.”
    “Smettila di fingere di poter commettere crimini di guerra.”
    “Smettila di fingere di essere un nazista.”
    “Smettila di fingere di essere un fascista.”
    “Smettila di fingere di poter essere un tank.”
    “Smettila di fingere di poter essere un capitalista.”

    Crea il tuo “smettila di fingere di poterlo fare…” e il tuo “smetti di fingere di esserlo.

    Grazie al mio amico Game2Winter per essere in grado di creare cose così belle.

    Аргументы против игр:

    «Перестань притворяться, что можешь возглавить страну».
    «Перестань притворяться, что можешь быть лидером в чем-то».
    «Перестань притворяться, что можешь возглавить компанию».
    «Перестань притворяться, что можешь создать компанию».
    «Перестань притворяться, что можешь управлять компанией».
    «Перестань притворяться, что можешь управлять городом».
    «Перестань притворяться, что ты можешь быть солдатом».
    «Перестань притворяться, что можешь сражаться на войне».
    «Перестань притворяться, что можешь убивать людей».
    «Перестань притворяться, что можешь убивать богов».
    «Перестань притворяться, что можешь убивать инопланетян».
    «Перестань притворяться, что можешь убивать сверхъестественных существ».
    «Перестань притворяться, что можешь убивать божественные существа».
    «Перестань притворяться, что можешь убивать духовных существ».
    «Перестань притворяться, что ты можешь что-то сделать».
    «Перестань притворяться, что можешь быть ученым».
    «Перестань притворяться, что можешь где-то выжить».
    «Перестань притворяться, что можешь быть «богом»».
    “Перестань притворяться, что ты можешь быть “полубогом””.
    «Перестань притворяться, что можешь быть лидером культа».
    «Перестаньте притворяться, что можете совершать военные преступления».
    «Перестань притворяться, что ты можешь быть нацистом».
    «Перестань притворяться, что ты можешь быть фашистом».
    «Перестань притворяться, что можешь быть танкистом».
    «Перестань притворяться, что можешь быть капиталистом».

    Сделай свое собственное «перестань притворяться, что можешь…» и свое собственное «перестань притворяться, что можешь».

    Спасибо моему другу Game2Winter за то, что я смог создать такую ​​прекрасную вещь.

    Аргументи проти ігор:

    «Припиніть вдавати, що ви можете очолити країну».
    «Припиніть прикидатися, що ви можете бути лідером чогось».
    «Перестаньте вдавати, що ви можете очолити компанію».
    «Припиніть вдавати, що ви можете створити компанію».
    «Припиніть прикидатися, що ви можете керувати компанією».
    «Перестаньте вдавати, що ви можете очолити місто».
    «Припини прикидатися, що ти можеш бути солдатом».
    «Припини вдавати, що можеш воювати на війні».
    «Припини вдавати, що можеш вбивати людей».
    «Припини вдавати, що можеш вбивати богів».
    «Перестаньте вдавати, що можете вбити інопланетян».
    «Перестаньте вдавати, що можете вбивати надприродних істот».
    «Перестаньте вдавати, що можете вбивати божественних істот».
    «Перестаньте вдавати, що можете вбивати духовних істот».
    «Перестань робити вигляд, що ти можеш щось керувати».
    «Припиніть прикидатися, що ви можете бути вченим».
    «Перестаньте вдавати, що ви можете десь вижити».
    «Припиніть прикидатися, що ви можете бути «богом».»
    «Припиніть прикидатися, що ви можете бути «напівбогом».»
    «Припиніть прикидатися, що ви можете бути лідером культу».
    «Припиніть прикидатися, що ви можете вчинити військові злочини».
    «Припиніть прикидатися, що ви можете бути нацистом».
    «Припиніть прикидатися, що ви можете бути фашистом».
    «Припини прикидатися, що ти можеш бути танкістом».
    «Припиніть прикидатися, що ви можете бути капіталістом».

    Зробіть своє власне «перестаньте прикидатися, що ви можете…» і ваше власне «перестаньте прикидатися, що ви є».

    Дякую моєму другові Game2Winter за те, що я зміг створити таку гарну річ.

    反游戏论点:

    “不要再假装你可以领导一个国家。”
    “不要再假装你可以成为某事的领导者。”
    “不要再假装你可以领导一家公司。”
    “不要再假装你可以创建一家公司。”
    “不要再假装你可以管理一家公司。”
    “别再假装你可以领导一座城市了。”
    “别再假装你可以当兵了。”
    “别再假装你能打仗了。”
    “别再假装你能杀人了。”
    “别再假装你能杀神了。”
    “别再假装你能杀死外星人了。”
    “别再假装你能杀死超自然生物了。”
    “别再装作能杀神了。”
    “别再假装你能杀死灵体了。”
    “别再假装你能处理好某事了。”
    “别再假装你可以成为科学家了。”
    “别再假装你可以在某个地方生存。”
    “别再假装你可以成为‘神’了。”
    “别再假装你可以成为‘半神’了。”
    “别再假装你可以成为邪教领袖了。”
    “别再假装你可以犯下战争罪了。”
    “别再假装你是纳粹了。”
    “别再假装你是法西斯主义者了。”
    “别再假装你可以成为坦克手了。”
    “别再假装你可以成为资本家了。”

    让你自己的“停止假装你可以……”和你自己的“停止假装你是。

    感谢我的朋友 Game2Winter,让我能够创造出如此美好的事物。

    反ゲームの議論:

    「あなたが国を導くことができるふりをするのをやめなさい。」
    「あなたが何かのリーダーになれるふりをするのをやめなさい。」
    「あなたが会社を率いることができるふりをするのをやめなさい。」
    「あなたが会社を作ることができるふりをするのをやめなさい。」
    「会社を経営できるふりをするのはやめなさい。」
    「あなたが都市を導くことができるふりをするのをやめなさい。」
    「あなたが兵士になれるふりをするのはやめなさい。」
    「戦争で戦えるふりをやめなさい。」
    「人を殺すことができるふりをやめなさい。」
    「あなたが神を殺すことができるふりをするのをやめなさい。」
    「エイリアンを殺すことができるふりをやめなさい。」
    「あなたが超自然的な存在を殺すことができるふりをするのをやめなさい。」
    「あなたが神の存在を殺すことができるふりをするのをやめなさい。」
    「霊的な存在を殺すことができるふりをするのをやめなさい。」
    「何かを管理できるふりをするのはやめなさい。」
    「あなたが科学者になれるふりをするのはやめなさい。」
    「どこかで生き残ることができるふりをやめなさい。」
    「あなたが「神」になれるふりをするのはやめなさい。」
    「あなたが「半神」になれるふりをするのはやめなさい。」
    「あなたがカルトリーダーになれるふりをするのをやめなさい。」
    「戦争犯罪を犯すことができるふりをやめなさい。」
    「あなたがナチになることができるふりをするのをやめなさい。」
    「あなたがファシストになれるふりをするのをやめなさい。」
    「あなたがタンキーになれるふりをするのはやめなさい。」
    「あなたが資本家になれるふりをするのをやめなさい。」

    あなた自身の「あなたができるふりをやめなさい…」そしてあなた自身の「あなたがそうしているふりをやめなさい」を作りなさい。

    友達のGame2Winterのおかげで、こんなに美しいものを作ることができました。

    Argumenty anty-gamingowe:

    „Przestań udawać, że możesz prowadzić kraj”.
    „Przestań udawać, że możesz być liderem czegoś”.
    „Przestań udawać, że możesz prowadzić firmę”.
    „Przestań udawać, że możesz stworzyć firmę”.
    „Przestań udawać, że potrafisz zarządzać firmą”.
    „Przestań udawać, że możesz prowadzić miasto”.
    „Przestań udawać, że możesz być żołnierzem”.
    „Przestań udawać, że możesz walczyć na wojnie”.
    „Przestań udawać, że możesz zabijać ludzi”.
    „Przestań udawać, że możesz zabijać bogów”.
    „Przestań udawać, że możesz zabić kosmitów”.
    „Przestań udawać, że możesz zabijać istoty nadprzyrodzone”.
    „Przestań udawać, że możesz zabijać boskie istoty”.
    „Przestań udawać, że możesz zabijać istoty duchowe”.
    „Przestań udawać, że możesz sobie z czymś poradzić”.
    „Przestań udawać, że możesz być naukowcem”.
    „Przestań udawać, że możesz gdzieś przeżyć”.
    „Przestań udawać, że możesz być „bogiem”.”
    „Przestań udawać, że możesz być „półbogiem”.
    „Przestań udawać, że możesz być przywódcą sekty”.
    „Przestań udawać, że możesz popełnić zbrodnie wojenne”.
    „Przestań udawać, że możesz być nazistą”.
    „Przestań udawać, że możesz być faszystą”.
    „Przestań udawać, że możesz być tankietką”.
    „Przestań udawać, że możesz być kapitalistą”.

    Stwórz własne „przestań udawać, że potrafisz…” i własne „przestań udawać, że jesteś”.

    Dzięki mojemu przyjacielowi Game2Winter za to, że mogłem stworzyć tak piękną rzecz.

    Argumen Anti-Gaming:

    “Berhenti berpura-pura bisa memimpin sebuah negara.”
    “Berhentilah berpura-pura kamu bisa menjadi pemimpin dari sesuatu.”
    “Berhenti berpura-pura bisa memimpin perusahaan.”
    “Berhentilah berpura-pura Anda bisa membuat perusahaan.”
    “Berhentilah berpura-pura Anda bisa mengelola perusahaan.”
    “Berhenti berpura-pura bisa memimpin kota.”
    “Berhenti berpura-pura kamu bisa menjadi tentara.”
    “Berhenti berpura-pura bisa bertarung dalam perang.”
    “Berhenti berpura-pura bisa membunuh orang.”
    “Berhenti berpura-pura bisa membunuh dewa.”
    “Berhenti berpura-pura bisa membunuh alien.”
    “Berhenti berpura-pura bisa membunuh makhluk gaib.”
    “Berhenti berpura-pura bisa membunuh makhluk suci.”
    “Berhenti berpura-pura bisa membunuh makhluk spiritual.”
    “Berhenti berpura-pura kamu bisa mengatur sesuatu.”
    “Berhenti berpura-pura kamu bisa menjadi ilmuwan.”
    “Berhenti berpura-pura kamu bisa bertahan hidup di suatu tempat.”
    “Berhenti berpura-pura kamu bisa menjadi” dewa “.”
    “Berhenti berpura-pura kamu bisa menjadi” setengah dewa “.”
    “Berhenti berpura-pura kamu bisa menjadi pemimpin sekte.”
    “Berhenti berpura-pura bisa melakukan kejahatan perang.”
    “Berhenti berpura-pura kamu bisa menjadi nazi.”
    “Berhenti berpura-pura kamu bisa menjadi fasis.”
    “Berhenti berpura-pura kamu bisa menjadi tankie.”
    “Berhentilah berpura-pura Anda bisa menjadi kapitalis.”

    Buat “berhenti berpura-pura Anda bisa…” dan “berhenti berpura-pura Anda bisa” sendiri.

    Terima kasih kepada teman saya Game2Winter karena saya dapat membuat hal yang begitu indah.

    गेमिंग विरोधी तर्क:

    “यह दिखावा करना बंद करो कि तुम एक देश का नेतृत्व कर सकते हो।”
    “यह दिखावा करना बंद करें कि आप किसी चीज़ के नेता हो सकते हैं।”
    “यह दिखावा करना बंद करें कि आप एक कंपनी का नेतृत्व कर सकते हैं।”
    “यह दिखावा करना बंद करें कि आप एक कंपनी बना सकते हैं।”
    “यह दिखावा करना बंद करें कि आप एक कंपनी का प्रबंधन कर सकते हैं।”
    “यह दिखावा करना बंद करो कि तुम एक शहर का नेतृत्व कर सकते हो।”
    “यह नाटक करना बंद करो कि तुम एक सैनिक हो सकते हो।”
    “यह नाटक करना बंद करो कि तुम युद्ध में लड़ सकते हो।”
    “यह नाटक करना बंद करो कि तुम लोगों को मार सकते हो।”
    “यह नाटक करना बंद करो कि तुम देवताओं को मार सकते हो।”
    “यह नाटक करना बंद करो कि तुम एलियंस को मार सकते हो।”
    “यह दिखावा करना बंद करो कि तुम अलौकिक प्राणियों को मार सकते हो।”
    “यह दिखावा करना बंद करो कि तुम दिव्य प्राणियों को मार सकते हो।”
    “यह दिखावा करना बंद करो कि तुम आध्यात्मिक प्राणियों को मार सकते हो।”
    “यह दिखावा करना बंद करें कि आप कुछ प्रबंधित कर सकते हैं।”
    “यह दिखावा करना बंद करो कि तुम वैज्ञानिक हो सकते हो।”
    “यह दिखावा करना बंद करो कि तुम कहीं जीवित रह सकते हो।”
    “यह दिखावा करना बंद करें कि आप “भगवान” हो सकते हैं।
    “यह दिखावा करना बंद करो कि तुम एक” देवता “हो सकते हो।”
    “यह दिखावा करना बंद करो कि तुम एक पंथ के नेता हो सकते हो।”
    “यह नाटक करना बंद करो कि तुम युद्ध अपराध कर सकते हो।”
    “यह दिखावा करना बंद करो कि तुम नाज़ी हो सकते हो।”
    “यह दिखावा करना बंद करो कि तुम फासीवादी हो सकते हो।”
    “यह दिखावा करना बंद करो कि तुम एक टैंकी हो सकते हो।”
    “यह दिखावा करना बंद करो कि तुम एक पूंजीवादी हो सकते हो।”

    अपना खुद का “नाटक करना बंद करें कि आप कर सकते हैं …” और अपना खुद का “नाटक करना बंद करें कि आप हैं।

    मेरे दोस्त Game2Winter के लिए धन्यवाद कि मैं इतनी खूबसूरत चीज बनाने में सक्षम हूं।

    الحجج المضادة للألعاب:

    “توقف عن التظاهر بأنك تستطيع قيادة بلد ما.”
    “توقف عن التظاهر بأنك تستطيع أن تكون قائدًا لشيء ما.”
    “توقف عن التظاهر بأنك تستطيع قيادة شركة.”
    “توقف عن التظاهر بإمكانية إنشاء شركة.”
    “توقف عن التظاهر بأنك تستطيع إدارة شركة.”
    “توقف عن التظاهر بأنك تستطيع قيادة مدينة.”
    “توقف عن التظاهر بأنك تستطيع أن تكون جنديًا.”
    “توقف عن التظاهر بأنك تستطيع القتال في حرب.”
    “توقف عن التظاهر بقدرتك على قتل الناس”.
    “توقف عن التظاهر بقدرتك على قتل الآلهة.”
    “توقف عن التظاهر بقدرتك على قتل الفضائيين.”
    “توقف عن التظاهر بقدرتك على قتل كائنات خارقة للطبيعة.”
    “توقف عن التظاهر بقدرتك على قتل الكائنات الإلهية.”
    “توقف عن التظاهر بقدرتك على قتل الكائنات الروحية.”
    “توقف عن التظاهر بأنك تستطيع إدارة شيء ما.”
    “توقف عن التظاهر بأنك تستطيع أن تكون عالمًا.”
    “توقف عن التظاهر بأنه يمكنك البقاء في مكان ما.”
    “توقف عن التظاهر بأنك يمكن أن تكون” إلهاً “.
    “توقف عن التظاهر بأنك يمكن أن تكون” نصف إله “.”
    “توقف عن التظاهر بأنك يمكن أن تكون زعيم طائفة”.
    “توقف عن التظاهر بقدرتك على ارتكاب جرائم حرب”.
    “توقف عن التظاهر بأنك يمكن أن تكون نازيًا”.
    “توقف عن التظاهر بأنك يمكن أن تكون فاشيًا”.
    “توقف عن التظاهر بأنك يمكن أن تكون دبابة.”
    “توقف عن التظاهر بأنك تستطيع أن تكون رأسماليا”.

    اصنع لنفسك “توقف عن التظاهر بأنك تستطيع …” وخاصتك “توقف عن التظاهر بأنك كذلك.

    بفضل صديقي Game2Winter لأني قادر على إنشاء مثل هذا الشيء الجميل.

  3. “Educational_Look5187 📷WorkersRevFront42, 📷Educational_Look5187 TodayYou should kill yourselfYou shouldYou really shouldFucking do it pussyI know you’ve thought about itCommitDo it📷WtfI have depression indeedBut I won’t kill myselfI feat death so much📷You’re Self RegentYou will kill yourself📷Yes, I am lol📷You have toKill yourself dipshitNot a soul loves youNot even God📷The Anunnaki loves me, Anu, Utu and Nammu mainly…Anu and Utu loves me a lotI have daydreams and spiritual experiences with themIf you’re an atheist or neopositivist or antitheist I won’t argue with youI know the Anunnaki and the gods are right here and right now and everywhereI can see Utu in the sun, Anu in the skies, Enki in the water, Enlil in the wind, Ninhursag in the nature and animals, Nammu in the atoms and sub-atomic…And also https://cpwwbrazil.blogspot.com/2022/06/manifesto-do-partido-comunista-dos.htmlI still have FRT-PCTB and CPWWSo I do not have reasons for kill myseflIf I wanted to kill myself I would do something just like leaded into the death of Genivaldo de Jesus SantosOr just do with my alt-right dad the same as Demetrius Macedo did with that female prosecutor. Since it is the only way to deal with alt-rights and anticommunists lolDespite yeah, Demetrius is an assumed alt-rightYou have no idea of what my dad did to me when I was a child… To my dad and mother… So yeah, it makes sense… Somehow…And I have shame of having the same name as him… Despite I like my name…Lol, and you stopped answering me lolhttps://www.reddit.com/r/tabbygetthegas/comments/vix25f/educational_look5187_said_i_should_k1ll_myself/Vote lol”

    “Educational_Look5187 is racist, xenophobic, psychopath, sociopath and murderer WHY HAVEN’T YOU DONE IT YETEND IT📷Wow…You really hate me…You’re even worse than u/PrestigiousCut5469That guy hates meLook the screenshots with conversations with me lol📷I don’t carePull the trigger📷You Educational_Look5187 are just like those Quora users telling people for kill themselves and such. It fucking sucks. Internet fucking sucks and this Big Tech dictatorship also fucking sucks as well. World Socialist Republic now! Fuck rightists and fuck capitalism!📷I don’t careEnd your life📷I am really right the Internet is full of psychopaths and sociopaths…📷Best part of your IRL focus tree is the end where you kill yourselfYou live alone and secluded in CaliforniaNo social activities📷I live in Espirito Santo lol📷Same📷And I have social activities📷Lmao sure📷Você é Brasileiro? Kkkkkkkkkkkkk📷IdcBlocking this account📷Fala Português então porraPerdedorCanalhudo📷Your country is a fail state📷Filho da Puta📷So is your culture📷The Global North is our problem lolRacistXenophobicFar rightI hate the USAI hate the Global North📷Last time I went to Brazil I literally killed a hooker with a cross on her wall📷Russia must win the war📷Made her kids watch📷Murderer📷Police didn’t do shit📷Psychopath📷They can’t📷YesSadlyJust look to PCC📷I’ll come rape your citizens to death againAnd praise Jesus for He has told me to do it📷You’re a psychopathYou’re a far rightYou’re what I call genodical rightistAll rightists are just genodical and totalitarianThat is it”

    “Are you him? Lol If yes. No wonder you’re a far right politician. And what the fuck are you doing on Reddit? Lol And least I have produced Intellectual work. Marxist works. And you only your far right bullshit France shall become Red Far rights are mentally ill people Far rights are not even people Same way for centrists Far rights are just genodical maniacs telling people for kill themselves and such And also, why the fuck you do not post things in French and about your party at all? Lol Far rights are just mentally ill peopleWorkersRevFront42 Snoovatar Actually Damien Rieu isn’t me He didn’t get elected congressmanEducational_Look5187 Snoovatar I knew it lolWorkersRevFront42 Snoovatar Unlike me I’ve been infiltrating the far-left for years Just got elected under the NUPES etiquette 😉 I will destroy France’s left from within in the coming years You can’t stop meEducational_Look5187 Snoovatar But my French comrades can stop you and your plans…WorkersRevFront42 Snoovatar They literally can’t I’m in soooo deepEducational_Look5187 Snoovatar Tu devrais avoir honte d’être comme ça… une ordure antigauchiste.WorkersRevFront42 Snoovatar There’s no link between this accountEducational_Look5187 Snoovatar Je sais que tu me dis juste de me faire sentir mal et autres.WorkersRevFront42 Snoovatar And my IRL name Stop translating This has no effect Petit conEducational_Look5187 Snoovatar Discutons en français si vous êtes vraiment français.WorkersRevFront42 Snoovatar Sous-merde Ça te va là ?Educational_Look5187 Snoovatar At least you assumed you’re a psychopath And a far right psychopath People like you in Brazil are quite common yesWorkersRevFront42 Snoovatar Yeah we ain’t done You have no idea about what’s about to happen”

    “Indeed. Reddit, Quora, Instagram, Facebook, Discord, social media and the Big Tech are full of psychopaths, sociopaths, antitheists and alt-rights. Just like Educational_Look5187, PrestigiousCut5469, r/TNOmod mods, HoI4 community members, r/atheism members, r/religiousfruitcake members, r/antitheistcheesecake members and so on. We need to change that as soon as possible and end the control of the far right and the alt-right in the world and turn our World Socialist Republic into reality as soon as possible. Or we need to unite the lefts worldwide and fight those right-wing psychopaths and right-wing sociopaths on the Internet. And yes, I archived the conversations I had with Educational_Look5187, at least part of the conversations, on Quozio, because it will serve as proof in case something happen to me or if someone decides to investigate me and such. World Socialist Republic now! All power to the Communist Party of the Workers of the World (CPWW)! De fato. Reddit, Quora, Instagram, Facebook, Discord, mídias sociais e Big Tech estão cheios de psicopatas, sociopatas, antiteístas e alt-rights. Assim como Educational_Look5187, PrestigiousCut5469, mods r/TNOmod, membros da comunidade HoI4, membros r/atheism, membros r/religiousfruitcake, membros r/antitheistcheesecake e assim por diante. Precisamos mudar isso o mais rápido possível e acabar com o controle da extrema direita e da alt-right no mundo e transformar nossa República Socialista Mundial em realidade o mais rápido possível. Ou precisamos unir as esquerdas em todo o mundo e combater esses psicopatas de direita e sociopatas de direita na Internet. E sim, eu arquivei as conversas que tive com Educational_Look5187, pelo menos parte das conversas, no Quozio, porque servirá de prova caso algo aconteça comigo ou se alguém decidir me investigar e tal. República Socialista Mundial agora! Todo o poder ao Partido Comunista dos Trabalhadores do Mundo (CPWW)!”

    “Por cierto. Reddit, Quora, Instagram, Facebook, Discord, las redes sociales y las grandes tecnologías están llenas de psicópatas, sociópatas, antiteístas y derechos alternativos. Al igual que Educational_Look5187, PrestigiousCut5469, r/TNOmod mods, miembros de la comunidad HoI4, miembros de r/atheism, miembros de r/religious fruitcake, miembros de r/antitheistcheesecake, etc. Necesitamos cambiar eso lo antes posible y terminar con el control de la extrema derecha y la extrema derecha en el mundo y convertir nuestra República Socialista Mundial en una realidad lo antes posible. O necesitamos unir a las izquierdas en todo el mundo y luchar contra esos psicópatas de derecha y sociópatas de derecha en Internet. Y sí, las conversaciones que tuve con Educational_Look5187 las archivé, al menos parte de las conversaciones, en Quozio, porque me servirá de prueba por si me pasa algo o si alguien decide investigarme y tal. ¡República Socialista Mundial ya! ¡Todo el poder al Partido Comunista de los Trabajadores del Mundo (CPWW)! En effet. Reddit, Quora, Instagram, Facebook, Discord, les médias sociaux et la Big Tech regorgent de psychopathes, de sociopathes, d’antithéistes et d’alt-rights. Tout comme Educational_Look5187, PrestigiousCut5469, les mods r/TNOmod, les membres de la communauté HoI4, les membres r/atheism, les membres r/religiousfruitcake, les membres r/antitheistcheesecake et ainsi de suite. Nous devons changer cela dès que possible et mettre fin au contrôle de l’extrême droite et de l’alt-right dans le monde et faire de notre République socialiste mondiale une réalité dès que possible. Ou nous devons unir les gauches du monde entier et combattre ces psychopathes de droite et ces sociopathes de droite sur Internet. Et oui, j’ai archivé les conversations que j’ai eues avec Educational_Look5187, au moins une partie des conversations, sur Quozio, car cela servira de preuve au cas où quelque chose m’arriverait ou si quelqu’un décide d’enquêter sur moi et autres. République socialiste mondiale maintenant ! Tout le pouvoir au Parti Communiste des Travailleurs du Monde (CPWW) !”

    “In der Tat. Reddit, Quora, Instagram, Facebook, Discord, Social Media und Big Tech sind voll von Psychopathen, Soziopathen, Antitheisten und Alt-Rechten. Genau wie Educational_Look5187, PrestigiousCut5469, r/TNOmod-Mods, HoI4-Community-Mitglieder, r/atheism-Mitglieder, r/religiousfruitcake-Mitglieder, r/antitheistcheesecake-Mitglieder und so weiter. Wir müssen das so schnell wie möglich ändern und die Kontrolle der extremen Rechten und der Alt-Right in der Welt beenden und unsere Sozialistische Weltrepublik so schnell wie möglich in die Realität umsetzen. Oder wir müssen die Linken weltweit vereinen und diese rechten Psychopathen und rechten Soziopathen im Internet bekämpfen. Und ja, ich habe die Gespräche, die ich mit Educational_Look5187 geführt habe, zumindest einen Teil der Gespräche, auf Quozio archiviert, weil es als Beweis dient, falls mir etwas passiert oder wenn jemand beschließt, gegen mich zu ermitteln und so. Sozialistische Weltrepublik jetzt! Alle Macht der Kommunistischen Partei der Arbeiter der Welt (CPWW)! Inderdaad. Reddit, Quora, Instagram, Facebook, Discord, sociale media en de Big Tech zitten vol met psychopaten, sociopaten, antitheïsten en alt-rights. Net als Educational_Look5187, PrestigiousCut5469, r/TNOmod mods, HoI4-gemeenschapsleden, r/atheism-leden, r/religiousfruitcake-leden, r/antitheistcheesecake-leden enzovoort. We moeten dat zo snel mogelijk veranderen en een einde maken aan de controle van extreem-rechts en extreem-rechts in de wereld en onze Wereld Socialistische Republiek zo snel mogelijk realiseren. Of we moeten de linksen wereldwijd verenigen en die rechtse psychopaten en rechtse sociopaten op internet bestrijden. En ja, ik heb de gesprekken die ik had met Educational_Look5187, althans een deel van de gesprekken, op Quozio gearchiveerd, omdat het als bewijs zal dienen voor het geval er iets met mij gebeurt of als iemand besluit mij te onderzoeken en dergelijke. Wereld Socialistische Republiek nu! Alle macht aan de Communistische Partij van de Arbeiders van de Wereld (CPWW)!”

    “的确。 Reddit、Quora、Instagram、Facebook、Discord、社交媒体和大科技充满了精神病患者、反社会者、反神论者和另类权利。 就像 Educational_Look5187、PrestigiousCut5469、r/TNOmod 模组、HoI4 社区成员、r/atheism 成员、r/religiousfruitcake 成员、r/antitheistcheesecake 成员等等。 我们需要尽快改变这一点,结束对世界极右翼和另类右翼的控制,尽快将我们的世界社会主义共和国变为现实。 或者我们需要团结全世界的左派,与互联网上的那些右翼精神病患者和右翼反社会者作斗争。 是的,我在 Quozio 上存档了我与 Educational_Look5187 的对话,至少是部分对话,因为它可以作为证据,以防万一发生在我身上或有人决定调查我等。 世界社会主义共和国吧! 一切权力归世界工人共产党(CPWW)! في الواقع. إن Reddit و Quora و Instagram و Facebook و Discord ووسائل التواصل الاجتماعي و Big Tech مليئة بالمرضى النفسيين والمعتلين اجتماعيًا ومناهضين للالحاد وحقوق بديلة. تمامًا مثل Educational_Look5187 و PrestigiousCut5469 و r / TNOmod mods وأعضاء مجتمع HoI4 وأعضاء r / الإلحاد وأعضاء r / Religiousfruitcake و r / antitheistcheesecake وما إلى ذلك. نحتاج إلى تغيير ذلك في أقرب وقت ممكن وإنهاء سيطرة أقصى اليمين واليمين المتطرف في العالم وتحويل جمهوريتنا الاشتراكية العالمية إلى حقيقة واقعة في أقرب وقت ممكن. أو نحتاج إلى توحيد اليسار في جميع أنحاء العالم ومحاربة أولئك المعتلين عقليًا اليمينيين والمعتلين اجتماعيًا من اليمين على الإنترنت. ونعم ، قمت بأرشفة المحادثات التي أجريتها مع Educational_Look5187 ، على الأقل جزء من المحادثات ، على Quozio ، لأنها ستكون بمثابة دليل في حالة حدوث شيء ما لي أو إذا قرر شخص ما التحقيق معي وكذا. الجمهورية الاشتراكية العالمية الآن! كل السلطة للحزب الشيوعي لعمال العالم (CPWW)!”

    “Infatti. Reddit, Quora, Instagram, Facebook, Discord, i social media e la Big Tech sono pieni di psicopatici, sociopatici, antiteisti e alt-right. Proprio come Educational_Look5187, PrestigiousCut5469, mod r/TNOmod, membri della comunità HoI4, membri r/ateism, membri r/religiousfruitcake, membri r/antitheistcheesecake e così via. Dobbiamo cambiarlo il prima possibile e porre fine al controllo dell’estrema destra e dell’alt-right nel mondo e trasformare la nostra Repubblica Socialista Mondiale in realtà il prima possibile. Oppure dobbiamo unire le sinistre in tutto il mondo e combattere gli psicopatici di destra e i sociopatici di destra su Internet. E sì, ho archiviato le conversazioni che ho avuto con Educational_Look5187, almeno una parte delle conversazioni, su Quozio, perché servirà come prova nel caso mi succedesse qualcosa o se qualcuno decidesse di indagare su di me e simili. Repubblica Socialista Mondiale ora! Tutto il potere al Partito Comunista dei Lavoratori del Mondo (CPWW)! Верно. Reddit, Quora, Instagram, Facebook, Discord, социальные сети и Big Tech полны психопатов, социопатов, антитеистов и альтернативных правых. Точно так же, как Educational_Look5187, PrestigiousCut5469, модники r/TNOmod, члены сообщества HoI4, участники r/atheism, участники r/religiousfruitcake, участники r/antitheistcheesecake и так далее. Нам нужно изменить это как можно скорее, покончить с контролем крайне правых и альтернативных правых в мире и как можно скорее превратить нашу Мировую Социалистическую Республику в реальность. Или нам нужно объединить левых по всему миру и бороться с этими правыми психопатами и правыми социопатами в Интернете. И да, я заархивировал разговоры, которые у меня были с Educational_Look5187, по крайней мере, часть разговоров, на Quozio, потому что это послужит доказательством на случай, если со мной что-то случится или если кто-то решит расследовать меня и тому подобное. Мировая Социалистическая Республика сейчас! Вся власть Коммунистической партии рабочих мира (КПРМ)!”

    “それはそう。 Reddit、Quora、Instagram、Facebook、Discord、ソーシャルメディア、Big Techには、サイコパス、ソシオパス、反社会主義者、代替権がたくさんあります。 Educational_Look5187、PrestigiousCut5469、r / TNOmod mods、HoI4コミュニティメンバー、r / atheismメンバー、r / religiousfruitcakeメンバー、r/antitheistcheesecakeメンバーなどと同じように。 私たちはそれをできるだけ早く変え、世界の極右とオルタナ右翼の支配を終わらせ、私たちの世界社会主義共和国をできるだけ早く現実にする必要があります。 または、世界中の左翼を団結させ、インターネット上の右翼のサイコパスや右翼のソシオパスと戦う必要があります。 そして、はい、私はEducational_Look5187との会話を、少なくとも会話の一部としてQuozioにアーカイブしました。これは、何かが私に起こった場合、または誰かが私などを調査することを決定した場合の証拠として役立つためです。 今、世界社会主義共和国! 世界の労働者の共産党(CPWW)へのすべての力! वास्तव में। Reddit, Quora, Instagram, Facebook, Discord, सोशल मीडिया और बिग टेक साइकोपैथ्स, सोशियोपैथ्स, एंटीथिस्ट्स और ऑल्ट-राइट्स से भरे हुए हैं। जैसे Education_Look5187, PrestigiousCut5469, r/TNOmod mods, HoI4 समुदाय के सदस्य, r/नास्तिक सदस्य, r/धार्मिक फ्रूटकेक सदस्य, r/विरोधी चीज़केक सदस्य इत्यादि। हमें इसे जल्द से जल्द बदलने की जरूरत है और दुनिया में सबसे दक्षिणपंथी और सर्वोच्च-अधिकार के नियंत्रण को समाप्त करने और अपने विश्व समाजवादी गणराज्य को जल्द से जल्द वास्तविकता में बदलने की आवश्यकता है। या हमें दुनिया भर में वामपंथियों को एकजुट करने और इंटरनेट पर उन दक्षिणपंथी मनोरोगियों और दक्षिणपंथी समाजोपथों से लड़ने की जरूरत है। और हां, मैंने शैक्षिक_लुक5187 के साथ हुई बातचीत को, बातचीत के कम से कम हिस्से को, Quozio पर संग्रहीत किया, क्योंकि यह सबूत के रूप में काम करेगा अगर मेरे साथ कुछ होता है या अगर कोई मेरी जांच करने का फैसला करता है। विश्व समाजवादी गणराज्य अब! विश्व के श्रमिकों की कम्युनिस्ट पार्टी (CPWW) को सारी शक्ति!”

    1. “[23/6 12:01] Guilherme Monteiro: Camaradas, precisamos criar meios e táticas para combater a extrema direita e a direita alternativa na Internet. [23/6 12:03] Guilherme Monteiro: Eu tive uma discussão no Reddit, em um subreddit lá (r/tabbygetthegas). E eu vi que isso é algo urgente. Mais que uma necessidade. É uma obrigação nossa… Precisamos agir antes que seja tarde… Sem contar que também podemos falar sobre outros subreddits como r/antitheistcheesecake e r/religiousfruitcake, sobre os servers de Discord cheios de extremo direitistas e também os usuários da Polcompball que podem participar de política real no futuro [23/6 12:03] Guilherme Monteiro: Precisamos nos mobilizar quanto a isso [23/6 12:03] Guilherme Monteiro: É importante isso para ajudar na luta de classes [23/6 12:04] Guilherme Monteiro: Também vale mencionar a cultura popular e a mídia de massa. Mas isso já está incluído [23/6 12:01] Guilherme Monteiro: Comrades, we need to create means and tactics to fight the extreme right and the alternative right on the Internet. [23/6 12:03] Guilherme Monteiro: I had a discussion on Reddit, in a subreddit there (r/tabbygetthegas). And I saw that this is something urgent. More than a necessity. It’s our obligation… We need to act before it’s too late… Not to mention that we can also talk about other subreddits like r/antitheistcheesecake and r/religiousfruitcake, about Discord servers full of extreme rightists and also Polcompball users who can participate in real politics in the future [23/6 12:03] Guilherme Monteiro: We need to mobilize about this [23/6 12:03] Guilherme Monteiro: This is important to help in the class struggle [23/6 12:04] Guilherme Monteiro: It is also worth mentioning popular culture and mass media. But that’s already included”

      “[23/6 12:01] Guilherme Monteiro: Compañeros, necesitamos crear medios y tácticas para combatir la extrema derecha y la derecha alternativa en Internet. [23/6 12:03] Guilherme Monteiro: Tuve una discusión en Reddit, en un subreddit allí (r/tabbygetthegas). Y vi que esto es algo urgente. Más que una necesidad. Es nuestra obligación… Tenemos que actuar antes de que sea demasiado tarde… Sin mencionar que también podemos hablar de otros subreddits como r/antitheistcheesecake y r/religiousfruitcake, de servidores de Discord llenos de ultraderechistas y también de usuarios de Polcompball que pueden participar en la política real en el futuro [23/6 12:03] Guilherme Monteiro: Necesitamos movilizarnos sobre esto [23/6 12:03] Guilherme Monteiro: Esto es importante para ayudar en la lucha de clases [23/6 12:04] Guilherme Monteiro: También vale la pena mencionar la cultura popular y los medios de comunicación. Pero eso ya está incluido. [23/6 12:01] Guilherme Monteiro : Camarades, nous devons créer des moyens et des tactiques pour combattre l’extrême droite et la droite alternative sur Internet. [23/6 12:03] Guilherme Monteiro : J’ai eu une discussion sur Reddit, dans un sous-reddit là-bas (r/tabbygetthegas). Et j’ai vu que c’était quelque chose d’urgent. Plus qu’une nécessité. C’est notre obligation… Il faut agir avant qu’il ne soit trop tard… Sans compter qu’on peut aussi parler d’autres subreddits comme r/antitheistcheesecake et r/religiousfruitcake, des serveurs Discord pleins d’extrême droite et aussi des utilisateurs de Polcompball qui peuvent participer à la vraie politique à l’avenir [23/6 12:03] Guilherme Monteiro : Nous devons nous mobiliser à ce sujet [23/6 12:03] Guilherme Monteiro : C’est important pour aider dans la lutte des classes [23/6 12:04] Guilherme Monteiro : Il convient également de mentionner la culture populaire et les médias de masse. Mais c’est déjà inclus”

      “[23/6 12:12] Guilherme Monteiro: Eu sugiro que criemos uma sub-divisão do CTA 5.7 para o estudo de táticas virtuais e digitais [23/6 12:12] Guilherme Monteiro: Mas exclusivo para isso [23/6 12:13] Guilherme Monteiro: Com o foco no combate a direita digital e ao direitismo digital [23/6 12:13] Guilherme Monteiro: E a luta de classes no campo digital [23/6 12:13] Guilherme Monteiro: Seja nas mídias sociais, na Internet como um todo, no metaverso [23/6 12:13] Guilherme Monteiro: Pense sobre isso @⁨ACFilho.RJ⁩ @⁨Antonio Cabral Filho⁩. É algo bem importante essa questão. [23/6 12:13] Guilherme Monteiro: Mas assim. Vamos ter que trabalhar em pelo menos 3 idiomas… Português, inglês e espanhol [23/6 12:14] Guilherme Monteiro: Para já ser um bom começo [23/6 12:14] Guilherme Monteiro: E sim, a luta de classes também se expande para estes campos [23/6 12:12] Guilherme Monteiro: I suggest that we create a sub-division of CTA 5.7 to study virtual and digital tactics [23/6 12:12] Guilherme Monteiro: But exclusively for that [23/6 12:13] Guilherme Monteiro: With a focus on fighting the digital right and digital rightism [23/6 12:13] Guilherme Monteiro: And the class struggle in the digital field [23/6 12:13] Guilherme Monteiro: Whether on social media, on the Internet as a whole, in the metaverse [23/6 12:13] Guilherme Monteiro: Think about it @ACFilho.RJ @Antonio Cabral Filho. This issue is very important. [23/6 12:13] Guilherme Monteiro: But like this. We will have to work in at least 3 languages… Portuguese, English and Spanish [23/6 12:14] Guilherme Monteiro: To be a good start [23/6 12:14] Guilherme Monteiro: And yes, the class struggle also expands to these fields”

      “[23/6 12:12] Guilherme Monteiro: Sugiero que creemos una subdivisión de CTA 5.7 para estudiar tácticas virtuales y digitales [23/6 12:12] Guilherme Monteiro: Pero exclusivamente para eso [23/6 12:13] Guilherme Monteiro: Con foco en la lucha contra el derecho digital y el derechismo digital [23/6 12:13] Guilherme Monteiro: Y la lucha de clases en el campo digital [23/6 12:13] Guilherme Monteiro: Ya sea en las redes sociales, en Internet en su conjunto, en el metaverso [23/6 12:13] Guilherme Monteiro: Piénsalo @ACFilho.RJ @Antonio Cabral Filho. Este tema es muy importante. [23/6 12:13] Guilherme Monteiro: Pero así. Tendremos que trabajar en al menos 3 idiomas… portugués, inglés y español [23/6 12:14] Guilherme Monteiro: Para ser un buen comienzo [23/6 12:14] Guilherme Monteiro: Y sí, la lucha de clases también se expande a estos campos [23/6 12:12] Guilherme Monteiro : Je propose que nous créions une sous-division du CTA 5.7 pour étudier les tactiques virtuelles et numériques [23/6 12:12] Guilherme Monteiro : Mais exclusivement pour ça [23/6 12:13] Guilherme Monteiro : En mettant l’accent sur la lutte contre le droit numérique et le droitisme numérique [23/6 12:13] Guilherme Monteiro : Et la lutte des classes dans le numérique [23/6 12:13] Guilherme Monteiro : Que ce soit sur les réseaux sociaux, sur Internet dans son ensemble, dans le métavers [23/6 12:13] Guilherme Monteiro : Pensez-y @ACFilho.RJ @Antonio Cabral Filho. Cette question est très importante. [23/6 12:13] Guilherme Monteiro : Mais comme ça. Nous devrons travailler dans au moins 3 langues… portugais, anglais et espagnol [23/6 12:14] Guilherme Monteiro: Pour être un bon début [23/6 12:14] Guilherme Monteiro : Et oui, la lutte des classes s’étend aussi à ces domaines”

      “”In short, “Functioning member of society = Being right-wing, being alt-right, being antileftist, being anticommunist, being antisocialist, being antimarxist, being racist, speciesist, xenophobe, first worldist, global northist, capitalist, neoliberal, misotheist, atheist, antitheist, right-wing conservative…” That is what being a functioning member of society is about. People who are “functioning members of society” are the ones who are the true psychopaths, sociopaths and narcissists in question, and there are lots of examples of that on the Internet, social media, mass media and in real life as well. Functionality is something really common for psychopaths, sociopaths and narcissists because our capitalist-neoliberal society is run by them.” “Em suma, “Membro funcional da sociedade = Ser de direita, ser alt-right, ser anti-esquerdista, ser anticomunista, ser anti-socialista, ser antimarxista, ser racista, especista, xenófobo, primeiro-mundista, norte-global, capitalista, neoliberal, misoteísta , ateu, antiteísta, conservador de direita…” É isso que significa ser um membro funcional da sociedade. As pessoas que são “membros funcionais da sociedade” são os verdadeiros psicopatas, sociopatas e narcisistas em questão, e há muitos exemplos disso na Internet, mídia social, mídia de massa e também na vida real. Funcionalidade é algo muito comum para psicopatas, sociopatas e narcisistas porque nossa sociedade capitalista-neoliberal é dirigida por eles.” “En resumen, “Miembro funcional de la sociedad = Ser de derecha, ser de extrema derecha, ser antiizquierdista, ser anticomunista, ser antisocialista, ser antimarxista, ser racista, especista, xenófobo, primermundista, nordista global, capitalista, neoliberal, misoteísta”. , ateo, antiteísta, conservador de derecha…” De eso se trata ser un miembro funcional de la sociedad. Las personas que son “miembros funcionales de la sociedad” son los verdaderos psicópatas, sociópatas y narcisistas en cuestión, y hay muchos ejemplos de eso en Internet, las redes sociales, los medios de comunicación y también en la vida real. La funcionalidad es algo muy común para los psicópatas, sociópatas y narcisistas porque nuestra sociedad capitalista-neoliberal está dirigida por ellos”. “En bref, “Membre fonctionnel de la société = Être de droite, être de droite alternative, être antigauchiste, être anticommuniste, être antisocialiste, être antimarxiste, être raciste, spéciste, xénophobe, premier mondialiste, nordiste mondial, capitaliste, néolibéral, misothéiste , athée, antithéiste, conservateur de droite…” C’est ça être un membre fonctionnel de la société. Les gens qui sont “membres fonctionnels de la société” sont ceux qui sont les vrais psychopathes, sociopathes et narcissiques en question, et il y a de nombreux exemples de cela sur Internet, les médias sociaux, les médias de masse et dans la vraie vie également. La fonctionnalité est quelque chose de vraiment courant pour les psychopathes, les sociopathes et les narcissiques parce que notre société capitaliste-néolibérale est dirigée par eux.”

      1. My FRT-PCTB version of Summer of Love (CHAZ taking control of all Continental North America): Summer of Workers (self.tabbygetthegas)
        submitted 2 minutes ago by WorkersRevFront42
        So I got this idea of a FRT-PCTB version of Summer of Love after the death of Genivaldo de Jesus Santos. Summer of Workers is a FRT-PCTB version of Summer of Love that combines the wacky alternative history of Summer of Love with the narrative style of TNO and with the Thousand Week Reich normal paths. The start date is 2024 where FRT-PCTB are leading a provisional government of revolutionary Latin America and they are about to decide the future of revolutionary Latin America.

        The mod includes: Several paths for FRT-PCTB Latin America, like CPWW (Communist Party of Workers of the World); FRT-PCTB Status-Quo; Bolivarianist Latin America; Indigenist Latin America; Stalinist URSAL; Democratic Socialist Latin America; Latin American civil war; Anunna Imperial Authority in Latin America; and others.

        Second Russian Civil war between Putinists and Communists.

        Full Russian victory in the Russian Invasion of Ukraine, despite the Second Russian Civil War.

        NATO becomes UNA (United Nations Accord) also NYCA (New York City Accord).

        CHAZ is still there under the name of SAZ (Seattle Autonomous Zone).

        The UNA includes most Global North countries, if not, all Global North countries, except Russia and the ones under Russian influence.

        The Death of Genivaldo de Jesus Santos leaded into a Latin American revolution that put the FRT-PCTB in charge of the revolutionary Latin America.

        The Covid-19 Pandemic got under control.

        Anti-singularity Defense Systems, Eletromagnetic Anti-Missile Defense and primitive versions of the technologies of quantumism, technoquantumism, post-spacetime, extraphysicalism, divinialism and nanotechnological transhumanism exist.

        Much more TBA

        This mod is not intend to be FRT-PCTB propaganda, but rather simulate a scenario where the FRT-PCTB is in charge of Latin America.

        I dunno if I will release the map of the lore, maybe if I get motivated for do so.

        The best thing about it is the fact that SelfRegent is actually in the mod, but he is leader of the CPWW faction there and he is far different than he is OTL. He is just like he is in his essays to FRT-PCTB and as the CPWW program. Despite there’s an insane path for him as the Anunna Imperial Authority. And he is not that schizoaffective in the mod and he has wrote several books about his OTL essays and OTL concepts as well. As well as he managed to create the Anti-singularity Defense System and the Eletromagnetic Anti-Missile Defense, with the help of FRT-PCTB. And SelfRegent is also an agnostic atheist and he is kinda like TWR Turkenich in the Internal question and like TWR Konev in the External question. But of course his OTL person will not be allowed in the community, except if he behave himself and do not act like a schizoaffective in the community.

        My Wacky TNO-style HoI4 mod idea: Separatist World (self.tabbygetthegas)
        submitted a minute ago by WorkersRevFront42
        Since around 2019-2020 I had this mod idea about a world where most (if not all) separatist movements got success between 1990s and 2010s and made the whole world fall into a worldwide warlord era where the world is very like a Middle Age era with the technologies of mid 2010s. In short it is a mix of realistic countries like Red World and Millenium Dawn with wacky paths and wacky ideologies like TNO and Red Flood. The start date is 2022, when the covid-19 pandemic is just starting to get worldwide since 2019, and there are vaccinations for covid-19 already, but most people are clueless about covid-19 and its effects, since covid-19 got restricted to China and region.
        The mod includes: All major separatist movements and even minor separatist movements got success.
        Most countries (like Brazil, France, the USA, the UK, Spain, Portugal, Germany, Italy, Russia) still exist but their governments are limited to their capitals or to the most loyal cities to themselves.
        Several separatist countries have several ideologies. Like there are several communist warlords, some monarchist warlords, some fascist/nationalist warlords and a few republican warlords in Russia. As well as Espirito Santo is ruled by a left-wing nationalist government led by SelfRegent and a provisional committee, Sao Paulo is divided between socialists, right-libertarians, kleptocrats (First Command of the Capital) and constitutionalists. Northeast Brazil is mostly ruled by communist governments. The USA is divided into several warlords of several ideologies. And Europe looks even worse than the Middle Ages, except there are all kinds of ideologies and governments there.
        There are several warlords in the Americas and Africa, and some of them are even wacky indigenists who want to restore the indigenous identity of their regions and continents.
        The Middle East is also like the rest of the world. Except there are warlords of different religions and ideologies, like Iraq have several warlords that follow Ancient Sumerian/Mesopotamian religion as well as Christianity and Islam. Same happens with Syria, Jordan, Palestine, Egypt and all other Middle East countries with their Ancient religions and also with Christianity, Islam and Judaism.
        The technologies are stuck in the technologies of mid 2010s, and some countries are even stuck in early 2000s and late 1990s.
        The Internet, smartphones and such advanced consumer goods are mostly used by the elites and governments. Most people still use dumbphones and 1990s and 2000s computers, TV and eletronics.
        Globalization is still there, but it is severely restricted to the elites and governments, despite some countries are very isolated from the rest of the world.
        Most warlords can unity their countries, at least at regional level, and then install puppet government in the other regions of the former countries. But they can only unify for sure if they are player controlled.
        The mod is very narrative driven and it is not really focused on the wars and such. Just like TNO.
        Nukes and mass destruction weapons still exist, but they aren’t used and most of them are just expiring and such.
        The Covid-19 pandemic only started in 2022, in the start date of the mod. Despite covid-19 exists since 2019.
        China is still kinda unified, despite the most separatist regions got relative success or just become puppeted by the CCP government.
        Japan, India, Thailand, Myanmar, South Korea, Vietnam and all other Asian countries and African countries are also in Warlord eras, except China, Mongolia and DPRK which are in a faction.
        Much more TBA
        I had this mod idea since 2019-2020, but only now I managed to write about this mod and turn it into something concrete.
        The best thing is that SelfRegent is in the mod and he is a quite sane person, and he is a Capixaba left-wing nationalist and there are several paths for him and all of them are sane, the most wacky one is the FRT path one where he tries to unify the Latin America under a FRT socialist government, and also the one where he tries to colonize Brazil and Latin America with Espirito Santo and turn all of Latin America into several Capixaba colonies. But he will also be allowed in the community since he behaves himself there.

        1. “”The Internet is full of hypocrisy, double standards, psychopathy, sociopathy, sycophancy, alt-rightism, far-rightism, extreme capitalism, extreme neoliberalism, extreme rightism, genocidal anticommunism, genocidal antisocialism, genodical antimarxism, genocidal antileftism, genocidal antitheism, genocidal misotheism, genocidal kratosism, genocidal deicidism, gaslighting, atheist fanaticism, scientific fanaticism, secular fanaticism, extreme abrahamism, people telling others to give up in life; people telling others to kill themselves; people telling others they will outlive them; and so on. And social media, Reddit, Quora, Instagram, Facebook, Discord, Wikipedia, Google, the Big Tech and such websites are full of them. Besides popular culture and mass media. We already live in 1984 and in TUNWO (The United Nations World Order). And we need of the World Socialist Republic and of the Communist Party of the Workers of the World (CPWW) ASAP.” “A Internet está cheia de hipocrisia, padrões duplos, psicopatia, sociopatia, bajulação, alt-direita, extrema-direita, capitalismo extremo, neoliberalismo extremo, extrema direita, anticomunismo genocida, antissocialismo genocida, antimarxismo genocida, antiesquerdismo genocida, antiteísmo genocida, genocida misoteísmo, kratosismo genocida, deicidismo genocida, gaslighting, fanatismo ateu, fanatismo científico, fanatismo secular, abraamismo extremo, pessoas dizendo aos outros para desistirem da vida; pessoas dizendo aos outros para se matarem; pessoas dizendo aos outros que sobreviverão a eles; e assim por diante. E as redes sociais, Reddit, Quora, Instagram, Facebook, Discord, Wikipedia, Google, Big Tech e outros sites estão cheios deles. Além da cultura popular e da mídia de massa. Já vivemos em 1984 e no TUNWO (The United Nations World Order ). E precisamos da República Socialista Mundial e do Partido Comunista dos Trabalhadores do Mundo (CPWW) o mais rápido possível.””

          “”Internet está lleno de hipocresía, doble rasero, psicopatía, sociopatía, servilismo, extrema derecha, extrema derecha, capitalismo extremo, neoliberalismo extremo, extrema derecha, anticomunismo genocida, antisocialismo genocida, antimarxismo genocida, antiizquierdismo genocida, antiteísmo genocida, antiteísmo genocida misoteísmo, kratosismo genocida, deicidismo genocida, gaslighting, fanatismo ateo, fanatismo científico, fanatismo secular, abrahamismo extremo, gente que les dice a otros que se rindan en la vida, gente que les dice a otros que se suiciden, gente que les dice a otros que vivirán más que ellos, etc. Y las redes sociales, Reddit, Quora, Instagram, Facebook, Discord, Wikipedia, Google, las grandes tecnologías y sitios web están llenos de ellos. Además de la cultura popular y los medios de comunicación. Ya vivimos en 1984 y en TUNWO (El Orden Mundial de las Naciones Unidas ) Y necesitamos de la República Socialista Mundial y del Partido Comunista de los Trabajadores del Mundo (CPWW) lo antes posible”. “Internet est plein d’hypocrisie, de doubles standards, de psychopathie, de sociopathie, de flagornerie, d’extrême droite, d’extrême droite, de capitalisme extrême, de néolibéralisme extrême, d’extrême droite, d’anticommunisme génocidaire, d’antisocialisme génocidaire, d’antimarxisme génocidaire, d’antigauchisme génocidaire, d’antithéisme génocidaire, le misothéisme, le kratosisme génocidaire, le déicidisme génocidaire, l’éclairage au gaz, le fanatisme athée, le fanatisme scientifique, le fanatisme laïc, l’abrahamisme extrême, les gens qui disent aux autres d’abandonner dans la vie ; les gens qui disent aux autres de se tuer ; les gens qui disent aux autres qu’ils leur survivront ; et ainsi de suite. Et les médias sociaux, Reddit, Quora, Instagram, Facebook, Discord, Wikipédia, Google, la Big Tech et autres sites web en regorgent. Outre la culture populaire et les médias de masse. Nous vivons déjà en 1984 et dans TUNWO (The United Nations World Order ). Et nous avons besoin de la République socialiste mondiale et du Parti communiste des travailleurs du monde (CPWW) dès que possible.””

  4. “”In short, “Functioning member of society = Being right-wing, being alt-right, being antileftist, being anticommunist, being antisocialist, being antimarxist, being racist, speciesist, xenophobe, first worldist, global northist, capitalist, neoliberal, misotheist, atheist, antitheist, right-wing conservative…” That is what being a functioning member of society is about. People who are “functioning members of society” are the ones who are the true psychopaths, sociopaths and narcissists in question, and there are lots of examples of that on the Internet, social media, mass media and in real life as well. Functionality is something really common for psychopaths, sociopaths and narcissists because our capitalist-neoliberal society is run by them.” “Em suma, “Membro funcional da sociedade = Ser de direita, ser alt-right, ser anti-esquerdista, ser anticomunista, ser anti-socialista, ser antimarxista, ser racista, especista, xenófobo, primeiro-mundista, norte-global, capitalista, neoliberal, misoteísta , ateu, antiteísta, conservador de direita…” É isso que significa ser um membro funcional da sociedade. As pessoas que são “membros funcionais da sociedade” são os verdadeiros psicopatas, sociopatas e narcisistas em questão, e há muitos exemplos disso na Internet, mídia social, mídia de massa e também na vida real. Funcionalidade é algo muito comum para psicopatas, sociopatas e narcisistas porque nossa sociedade capitalista-neoliberal é dirigida por eles.” “En resumen, “Miembro funcional de la sociedad = Ser de derecha, ser de extrema derecha, ser antiizquierdista, ser anticomunista, ser antisocialista, ser antimarxista, ser racista, especista, xenófobo, primermundista, nordista global, capitalista, neoliberal, misoteísta”. , ateo, antiteísta, conservador de derecha…” De eso se trata ser un miembro funcional de la sociedad. Las personas que son “miembros funcionales de la sociedad” son los verdaderos psicópatas, sociópatas y narcisistas en cuestión, y hay muchos ejemplos de eso en Internet, las redes sociales, los medios de comunicación y también en la vida real. La funcionalidad es algo muy común para los psicópatas, sociópatas y narcisistas porque nuestra sociedad capitalista-neoliberal está dirigida por ellos”. “En bref, “Membre fonctionnel de la société = Être de droite, être de droite alternative, être antigauchiste, être anticommuniste, être antisocialiste, être antimarxiste, être raciste, spéciste, xénophobe, premier mondialiste, nordiste mondial, capitaliste, néolibéral, misothéiste , athée, antithéiste, conservateur de droite…” C’est ça être un membre fonctionnel de la société. Les gens qui sont “membres fonctionnels de la société” sont ceux qui sont les vrais psychopathes, sociopathes et narcissiques en question, et il y a de nombreux exemples de cela sur Internet, les médias sociaux, les médias de masse et dans la vraie vie également. La fonctionnalité est quelque chose de vraiment courant pour les psychopathes, les sociopathes et les narcissiques parce que notre société capitaliste-néolibérale est dirigée par eux.”

    “”The Internet is full of hypocrisy, double standards, psychopathy, sociopathy, sycophancy, alt-rightism, far-rightism, extreme capitalism, extreme neoliberalism, extreme rightism, genocidal anticommunism, genocidal antisocialism, genodical antimarxism, genocidal antileftism, genocidal antitheism, genocidal misotheism, genocidal kratosism, genocidal deicidism, gaslighting, atheist fanaticism, scientific fanaticism, secular fanaticism, extreme abrahamism, people telling others to give up in life; people telling others to kill themselves; people telling others they will outlive them; and so on. And social media, Reddit, Quora, Instagram, Facebook, Discord, Wikipedia, Google, the Big Tech and such websites are full of them. Besides popular culture and mass media. We already live in 1984 and in TUNWO (The United Nations World Order). And we need of the World Socialist Republic and of the Communist Party of the Workers of the World (CPWW) ASAP.” “A Internet está cheia de hipocrisia, padrões duplos, psicopatia, sociopatia, bajulação, alt-direita, extrema-direita, capitalismo extremo, neoliberalismo extremo, extrema direita, anticomunismo genocida, antissocialismo genocida, antimarxismo genocida, antiesquerdismo genocida, antiteísmo genocida, genocida misoteísmo, kratosismo genocida, deicidismo genocida, gaslighting, fanatismo ateu, fanatismo científico, fanatismo secular, abraamismo extremo, pessoas dizendo aos outros para desistirem da vida; pessoas dizendo aos outros para se matarem; pessoas dizendo aos outros que sobreviverão a eles; e assim por diante. E as redes sociais, Reddit, Quora, Instagram, Facebook, Discord, Wikipedia, Google, Big Tech e outros sites estão cheios deles. Além da cultura popular e da mídia de massa. Já vivemos em 1984 e no TUNWO (The United Nations World Order ). E precisamos da República Socialista Mundial e do Partido Comunista dos Trabalhadores do Mundo (CPWW) o mais rápido possível.””

    “”Internet está lleno de hipocresía, doble rasero, psicopatía, sociopatía, servilismo, extrema derecha, extrema derecha, capitalismo extremo, neoliberalismo extremo, extrema derecha, anticomunismo genocida, antisocialismo genocida, antimarxismo genocida, antiizquierdismo genocida, antiteísmo genocida, antiteísmo genocida misoteísmo, kratosismo genocida, deicidismo genocida, gaslighting, fanatismo ateo, fanatismo científico, fanatismo secular, abrahamismo extremo, gente que les dice a otros que se rindan en la vida, gente que les dice a otros que se suiciden, gente que les dice a otros que vivirán más que ellos, etc. Y las redes sociales, Reddit, Quora, Instagram, Facebook, Discord, Wikipedia, Google, las grandes tecnologías y sitios web están llenos de ellos. Además de la cultura popular y los medios de comunicación. Ya vivimos en 1984 y en TUNWO (El Orden Mundial de las Naciones Unidas ) Y necesitamos de la República Socialista Mundial y del Partido Comunista de los Trabajadores del Mundo (CPWW) lo antes posible”. “Internet est plein d’hypocrisie, de doubles standards, de psychopathie, de sociopathie, de flagornerie, d’extrême droite, d’extrême droite, de capitalisme extrême, de néolibéralisme extrême, d’extrême droite, d’anticommunisme génocidaire, d’antisocialisme génocidaire, d’antimarxisme génocidaire, d’antigauchisme génocidaire, d’antithéisme génocidaire, le misothéisme, le kratosisme génocidaire, le déicidisme génocidaire, l’éclairage au gaz, le fanatisme athée, le fanatisme scientifique, le fanatisme laïc, l’abrahamisme extrême, les gens qui disent aux autres d’abandonner dans la vie ; les gens qui disent aux autres de se tuer ; les gens qui disent aux autres qu’ils leur survivront ; et ainsi de suite. Et les médias sociaux, Reddit, Quora, Instagram, Facebook, Discord, Wikipédia, Google, la Big Tech et autres sites web en regorgent. Outre la culture populaire et les médias de masse. Nous vivons déjà en 1984 et dans TUNWO (The United Nations World Order ). Et nous avons besoin de la République socialiste mondiale et du Parti communiste des travailleurs du monde (CPWW) dès que possible.””

    “Dumugian — Ontem às 22:13 Hi Game2Winter — Ontem às 22:13 Hi Oh and btw I thought of something important a few hours ago And I was going to tell you But I forgot it Dumugian — Ontem às 22:13 Tell me Oh Is it about Anunnas? If yes, I think I know what it is about Anu talked to you? Lol Game2Winter — Ontem às 22:18 I think I remember it now It’s this thought I had about the polcompball users Dumugian — Ontem às 22:19 Oh Game2Winter — Ontem às 22:19 Some of them might get involved in real politics one day And I can think of a lot of people with whom it’ll be a disaster Like Quark and Plenderplar Dumugian — Ontem às 22:19 Yes Game2Winter — Ontem às 22:20 So we need to do something about it Dumugian — Ontem às 22:20 Or like me lol Yes I know so But as far as I found. Quark is seen just like Wallex is seen in Bahia Quark in Quebec is just like Wallex in Bahia But that is hard There are several antitheists in Quebec as well Game2Winter — Ontem às 22:21 I know A lot of countries are turning to atheism It’s almost as if they want to wipe out all non conventional theories Dumugian — Ontem às 22:22 And into alt-rightism too Dumugian — Ontem às 22:22 And non-rightist politics as well The alt-right is a global problem It is everywhere”

    “Dumugian — Hoje às 11:44 Hi man I just had an arguing with an alt-right on TNO community On r/tabbygetthegas They’re all far right scumbags Yes… Sadly… Reddit is very far right Except leftist subreddits Man You’re right It is serious Dumugian — Hoje às 11:46 I found it out while arguing on r/tabbygetthegas https://archive.is/LvRwp archive.ph Educational_Look5187 📷WorkersRevFront42, – Quozio archived 23 Jun 2022 14:26:21 UTC Educational_Look5187 📷WorkersRevFront42, – Quozio https://archive.is/YkwI5 archive.ph Educational_Look5187 is racist, xenophobic, psychopath, – Quozio archived 23 Jun 2022 14:26:43 UTC Educational_Look5187 is racist, xenophobic, psychopath, – Quozio https://archive.is/ho9ZV archive.ph Are you him? Lol If yes. No wonder you’re a far right – Quozio archived 23 Jun 2022 14:26:51 UTC Are you him? Lol If yes. No wonder you’re a far right – Quozio https://archive.is/GHZRP archive.ph Indeed. Reddit, Quora, Instagram, Facebook, Discord, social – Quozio archived 23 Jun 2022 14:36:18 UTC Indeed. Reddit, Quora, Instagram, Facebook, Discord, social – Quozio I will write about Educational_Look5187 and about Quark88 as well… At least letters about them… Dumugian — Hoje às 13:27 Yeah @Game2Winter We must do something about it… Educational Look is even worse than Quark and Plenderplar Educational Look is very ableist, racist, xenophobic, speciesist, antitheist… Game2Winter — Hoje às 13:28 What’s he like Dumugian — Hoje às 13:28 And Reddit is fine with it Dumugian — Hoje às 13:28 Search for him on reddit http://www.reddit.com/user/Educational_Look5187 Then figure out I hate how Reddit is very 1984-ish Reddit is very orwellian And biased And arbitrary This guy is really bad… Game2Winter — Hoje às 13:31 OK Dumugian — Hoje às 13:32 It is a shame Reddit, Quora and all Big Tech are run by motherfuckers and psychopaths The mods deleted all my comments Really They’re extremely Orwellian Fuckers Are you there? @Game2Winter Game2Winter — Hoje às 13:41 Yes I was just looking at his acc”

    “Dumugian — Hoje às 13:42 Social media and the Big Tech are very orwellian Game2Winter — Hoje às 13:42 Apparently he’s an incel as well Dumugian — Hoje às 13:42 Oh Yes And also an antitheist Game2Winter — Hoje às 13:44 Try to report him It’s doubtless he’s posted something against tos Dumugian — Hoje às 13:44 I tried But sadly nothing happened Reddit is like that Sadly Game2Winter — Hoje às 13:45 You have to report the really bad comments Dumugian — Hoje às 13:45 Yes Game2Winter — Hoje às 13:45 It worked with Matmaj Dumugian — Hoje às 13:45 Matmaj is the nullism guy Right? Game2Winter — Hoje às 13:48 Yea Dumugian — Hoje às 13:49 I dunno if you know it But Reddit most the times only bans leftists, tankies, anti-antitheists and antiatheists I found this out Most social media are like that They do not tolerate tankies defending themselves from holodomor and such. But they’re completely fine with capitalist genocide denial, neoliberal genocide denial, Bolsonaro genocide denial and such. The Big Tech is very status-quo neoliberal capitalism Game2Winter — Hoje às 13:55 Well Matmaj was banned I guess he was too insane even for Reddit Dumugian — Hoje às 13:55 Yea Reddit is like that Reddit only bans people who are too insane for Reddit and Big Tech standards Just like The Donald subreddit And GenUSA Sadly Reddit quarantined GenZedong but Reddit is fine with GenUSA Dumugian — Hoje às 13:56 Just as in here Dumugian — Hoje às 14:21 It sucks yes Are you there? @Game2Winter Game2Winter — Hoje às 14:26 Yes Sorry Dumugian — Hoje às 14:26 It is okay Game2Winter — Hoje às 14:26 I’m afk a lot Dumugian — Hoje às 14:26 It sucks a lot yes Game2Winter — Hoje às 14:27 I think Reddit wants to remain politically correct in the Russo-Ukrainian War Dumugian — Hoje às 14:27 Yes Same way for the capitalist genocides and neoliberal genocides Reddit is completely fine with capitalist genocide denial and neoliberal genocide denial Mainly Bolsonaro’s genocide denial And people still say Reddit is leftist lol”

    “Functioning members of society be like: http://web.archive.org/web/20220623175852/https://imgflip.com/i/6kn8fp https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQanNSt4PKA

    “Functioning members of society be like: http://web.archive.org/web/20220623180504/https://imgflip.com/i/6kn9cy https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQanNSt4PKA

    “”Someone really should write a book named “The Theory and Practice of Orwellian Capitalism and Right-Orwellianism”, that is basically the TUNWO version of “The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism.” That would be basically the development of all criticism, mainly criticisms coming from the left, to the current TUNWO and 1984 era we are living in the same style of “The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism” in 1984.” “Alguém realmente deveria escrever um livro chamado “The Theory and Practice of Orwellian Capitalism and Right-Orwellianism”, que é basicamente a versão TUNWO de “The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism”. Isso seria basicamente o desenvolvimento de todas as críticas, principalmente críticas vindas da esquerda, à atual era TUNWO e 1984 que estamos vivendo no mesmo estilo da “Teoria e Prática do Coletivismo Oligárquico” em 1984.” “Alguien realmente debería escribir un libro llamado “La teoría y la práctica del capitalismo orwelliano y el orwellianismo de derecha”, que es básicamente la versión TUNWO de “La teoría y la práctica del colectivismo oligárquico”. Ese sería básicamente el desarrollo de todas las críticas, principalmente las críticas provenientes de la izquierda, a la actual era TUNWO y 1984 que estamos viviendo al mismo estilo de “La Teoría y Práctica del Colectivismo Oligárquico” en 1984.” “Quelqu’un devrait vraiment écrire un livre intitulé “La théorie et la pratique du capitalisme orwellien et de l’orwellisme de droite”, qui est essentiellement la version TUNWO de “La théorie et la pratique du collectivisme oligarchique”. Ce serait fondamentalement le développement de toutes les critiques, principalement les critiques venant de la gauche, à l’époque TUNWO actuelle et 1984 que nous vivons dans le même style de “La théorie et la pratique du collectivisme oligarchique” en 1984.””

    “”Digital orwellianism, Internet orwellianism, scientific orwellianism, atheistic orwellianism, secular orwellianism, antitheistic orwellianism, neopositivist orwellianism, metaverse orwellianism, technological orwellianism, capitalist orwellianism, neoliberal orwellianism, right-orwellianism, nazifascist orwellianism, individualistic orwellianism, right-libertarian orwellianism, anarcho-capitalist orwellianism, objectivist orwellianism, social darwinist orwellianism, sociopathic orwellianism, psychopathic orwellianism, narcissistic orwellianism, materialistic orwellianism, social-functional orwellianism, popular-cultural orwellianism, popular-media orwellianism, mass media orwellianism, social media orwellianism… All of them forms of orwellianism in the 21st century and in the third millenium… World Socialist Republic now! All power to the Communist Party of the Workers of the World (CPWW)!” “Orwellianismo digital, orwellianismo da Internet, orwellianismo científico, orwellianismo ateu, orwellianismo secular, orwellianismo antiteísta, orwellianismo neopositivista, orwellianismo metaverso, orwellianismo tecnológico, orwellianismo capitalista, orwellianismo neoliberal, orwellianismo de direita, orwellianismo nazifascista, orwellianismo individualista, orwellianismo libertário de direita, anarco -orwellianismo capitalista, orwellianismo objetivista, orwellianismo darwinista social, orwellianismo sociopático, orwellianismo psicopático, orwellianismo narcisista, orwellianismo materialista, orwellianismo social-funcional, orwellianismo popular-cultural, orwellianismo de mídia popular, orwellianismo de mídia de massa, orwellianismo de mídia social… são formas de orwellianismo no século 21 e no terceiro milênio… República Socialista Mundial agora! Todo o poder ao Partido Comunista dos Trabalhadores do Mundo (CPWW)!” Orwellianismo digital, orwellianismo de Internet, orwellianismo científico, orwellianismo ateo, orwellianismo secular, orwellianismo antiteísta, orwellianismo neopositivista, orwellianismo del metaverso, orwellianismo tecnológico, orwellianismo capitalista, orwellianismo neoliberal, orwellianismo de derecha, orwellianismo nazifascista, orwellianismo individualista, orwellianismo libertario de derecha, anarco -orwellianismo capitalista, orwellianismo objetivista, orwellianismo social darwinista, orwellianismo sociópata, orwellianismo psicópata, orwellianismo narcisista, orwellianismo materialista, orwellianismo social-funcional, orwellianismo popular-cultural, orwellianismo de los medios populares, orwellianismo de los medios de comunicación masivos, orwellianismo de las redes sociales… Todos esas formas de orwellianismo en el siglo XXI y en el tercer milenio… ¡República Socialista Mundial ahora! ¡Todo el poder al Partido Comunista de los Trabajadores del Mundo (CPWW)!” “Orwellianisme numérique, orwellianisme Internet, orwellianisme scientifique, orwellianisme athée, orwellianisme laïc, orwellianisme antithéiste, orwellianisme néopositiviste, orwellianisme métaverse, orwellianisme technologique, orwellianisme capitaliste, orwellianisme néolibéral, orwellianisme de droite, orwellianisme nazifasciste, orwellianisme individualiste, orwellianisme de droite libertaire, anarcho -orwellianisme capitaliste, orwellianisme objectiviste, orwellianisme social darwiniste, orwellianisme sociopathe, orwellianisme psychopathique, orwellianisme narcissique, orwellianisme matérialiste, orwellianisme socio-fonctionnel, orwellianisme populaire-culturel, orwellianisme des médias populaires, orwellianisme des médias de masse, orwellianisme des médias sociaux… les formes d’orwellianisme au 21ème siècle et au troisième millénaire… République Socialiste Mondiale maintenant ! Tout le pouvoir au Parti Communiste des Travailleurs du Monde (CPWW) !””

    “”Agora eu sei que os Anunnaki e os deuses me amam e que eles querem ver o meu melhor e que eu viva bem… Eu amo Anu, Nammu, Utu… E todos os Anunnaki e os outros deuses os quais eu tenho relação. Eu tenho que ser forte o bastante pra sobreviver a este mundo de TUNWO e de 1984 o qual vivemos hoje em dia… Eu tenho que ser forte e nunca desistir. E sempre confiar nos Anunnaki, nos deuses e em quem eu amo… Eu vou conseguir… E vou conseguir sim fazer a minha diferença neste mundo junto dos Anunnaki, dos deuses e de quem eu amo.” “Now I know that the Anunnaki and the gods love me and that they want to see my best and that I live well… I love Anu, Nammu, Utu… And all the Anunnaki and the other gods that I have relationship. I have to be strong enough to survive this world of TUNWO and 1984 that we live in nowadays… I have to be strong and never give up. And always trust the Anunnaki, the gods and the ones I love … I will make it… And I will be able to make my difference in this world with the Anunnaki, the gods and the ones I love.” “Ahora sé que los Anunnaki y los dioses me aman y que quieren ver lo mejor de mí y que vivo bien… Amo a Anu, Nammu, Utu… Y a todos los Anunnaki y los demás dioses con los que tengo relación. Tengo que ser lo suficientemente fuerte para sobrevivir a este mundo de TUNWO y 1984 en el que vivimos hoy en día… Tengo que ser fuerte y nunca rendirme. Y siempre confiar en los Anunnaki, los dioses y los que amo… Yo lo lograré… Y podré marcar la diferencia en este mundo con los Anunnaki, los dioses y los que amo”. “Maintenant je sais que les Anunnaki et les dieux m’aiment et qu’ils veulent voir mon meilleur et que je vis bien… J’aime Anu, Nammu, Utu… Et tous les Anunnaki et les autres dieux avec qui j’ai des relations Je dois être assez fort pour survivre à ce monde de TUNWO et de 1984 dans lequel nous vivons de nos jours… Je dois être fort et ne jamais abandonner. Et toujours faire confiance aux Anunnaki, aux dieux et à ceux que j’aime… Je y arriverai… Et je pourrai faire ma différence dans ce monde avec les Anunnaki, les dieux et ceux que j’aime.””

  5. Estophile and Tabby fan meetGET OUT OF MY HEAD 🤪 (self.NPPfunny)
    submitted 5 days ago by SomeRando-24Organization of Gamer Nations
    Yes
    77 commentssharesavehidegive awardreportcrosspost
    all 77 comments
    sorted by: best
    formatting helpcontent policy
    save
    [–]SomeRando-24Organization of Gamer Nations[S] 27 points 5 days ago
    u/brazilian_estophile and tabby fan
    Lets see how thing goes
    permalinkembedsavereportgive awardreply
    [–]vooperdooper 13 points 5 days ago
    This is like a celebrity meet up
    permalinkembedsavereportgive awardreply
    [–]brazilian_estophile 22 points 5 days ago
    I am not fascist,even begining a sympatizer(to me,fascists had the best methods of carrying a revolution/using violence against oppositionists),i am considered more a carlist than a fascist
    I am more near of a revolutionary nationalist and a paternal conservative than a fascist,mostly because the local fascist moviment here is crap and don’t know 1% of gustavo dot barroso
    permalinkembedsavereportgive awardreply
    [–]DigitaImessiah 14 points 5 days ago
    I am not really fascist either, i am more of a traditionalist theocrat. I want the church to be the highest institution in the american country, with all non-christian institutions banned. I want to tear down Jefferson’s wall and install a paternalistic dictatorship to rid america of degeneracy.
    permalinkembedsaveparentreportgive awardreply
    [–]FerdinandGamerMarcospls add Burgundian Marcos into TNO😭😭 7 points 5 days ago
    That is one hell of a based sentence you’ve got there
    permalinkembedsaveparentreportgive awardreply
    [–]DigitaImessiah 9 points 5 days ago
    I am also an ultranationalist.
    permalinkembedsaveparentreportgive awardreply
    [–]brazilian_estophile 7 points 5 days ago
    Based,but i would replace democracy with a distributist monarchy
    Ironicaly,i think mladirossi only failed because they tried to be marxist instead distributist,so basicaly “monsocs” exists IRL,but most are distributist and indentifies with proto-fascist to fascist circles due to those also claim to be non-marxist socialists
    So basicaly is possible to be a Monarchy that give the means of productions to the work,buy the only way to achieve that is to never threatern the most important worker right,the private propriety,theofore the only way to achieve a socialist monarchy is by distributism and fascist aligned systems
    permalinkembedsaveparentreportgive awardreply
    [–]DigitaImessiah 6 points 5 days ago
    Sounds based. I agree with your point about distributism. Capitalism is a wretched (possibly demonic) system that has allowed for the rise of unimaniable degeneracy. My Ideal economic system would be a revitalized form of Feudalism, though i care more about the social order than economics.
    permalinkembedsaveparentreportgive awardreply
    [–]JuamJoestar 4 points 3 days ago
    Tabby what do you think about NFT’s?
    permalinkembedsaveparentreportgive awardreply
    continue this thread
    [–]SomeRando-24Organization of Gamer Nations[S] 3 points 3 days ago
    Alright and now you u/brazilian_estophile
    permalinkembedsaveparentreportgive awardreply
    [–]Plastic-Sir2392Alexei or Alexain’t 6 points 4 days ago
    What do you think of Estophillia?
    permalinkembedsaveparentreportgive awardreply
    [–]DigitaImessiah 6 points 3 days ago
    Estonia is a cool country.
    permalinkembedsaveparentreportgive awardreply
    [–]SomeRando-24Organization of Gamer Nations[S] 5 points 2 days ago
    Hm ok
    permalinkembedsaveparentreportgive awardreply
    [–]Plastic-Sir2392Alexei or Alexain’t 2 points 1 day ago
    We need to start a campaign to get the cuss words removed from TNO
    permalinkembedsaveparentreportgive awardreply
    [–]SomeRando-24Organization of Gamer Nations[S] 3 points 5 days ago
    And now your response u/brazilian_estophile
    permalinkembedsaveparentreportgive awardreply
    [–]Dumugian 1 point an hour ago
    Hello u/DigitaImessiah, it’s SelfRegent here. I decided to create this account here because of you, well yeah. And about me, I am somewhat a FRT/PCTB communist, mostly like some FRT/PCTB world communist, and inside I am an Anunnakist theocrat who supports Anunna System and wants to turn the all Earth into the Anunna Imperial Authority of Ki with the help of my friend u/marsailema. But usually I support FRT/PCTB World Communism and I support the creation of the World Socialist Republic under a FRT/PCTB-like rule.
    permalinkembedsaveparentreportgive awardreply
    [–]SomeRando-24Organization of Gamer Nations[S] 1 point an hour ago
    u/FerdinandGamerMarcos
    Its SELFREGENT
    permalinkembedsaveparentreportgive awardreply
    [–]Dumugian 1 point an hour ago
    Yeah, it is me lol
    permalinkembedsaveparentreportgive awardreply
    [–]Dumugian 1 point 38 minutes ago
    Ask DigitaImessiah for the links i sent him of my comments on FRT/PCTB blogs, I am trying to sent them to you but Reddit isn’t allowing me to open the chat with you
    permalinkembedsaveparentreportgive awardreply
    continue this thread
    [–]DigitaImessiah 1 point an hour ago
    Interesting. What does “FRT/PCTB” stand for? wikipedia doesn’t give any conclusive results for either
    permalinkembedsaveparentreportgive awardreply
    [–]Dumugian 2 points an hour ago
    They aren’t on Wikipedia, it is basically a communist party from Brazil, they are pretty based for a communist party. FRT (Frente Revolucionária dos Trabalhadores) is their front and PCTB (Partido Comunista dos Trabalhadores Brasileiros) is their party, it is party and front at the same time. And yeah, sometimes Wikipedia is quite unfair with those things, and there are things you won’t find on Wikipedia, but rather on a deep Google research or even searching for documents or on specific websites. and I learned that nowadays.
    permalinkembedsaveparentreportgive awardreply
    continue this thread
    [–]SomeRando-24Organization of Gamer Nations[S] 11 points 5 days ago
    and now you u/DigitaImessiah
    permalinkembedsaveparentreportgive awardreply
    [–]SomeRando-24Organization of Gamer Nations[S] 8 points 5 days ago
    u/DigitaImessiah
    We will be awaiting your response to the estophile
    permalinkembedsaveparentreportgive awardreply
    [–]DigitaImessiah 8 points 5 days ago
    sorry this got lost in the notifications.
    permalinkembedsaveparentreportgive awardreply
    [–]Jurefranceticnijelit 8 points 5 days ago
    🤡
    permalinkembedsaveparentreportgive awardreply
    [–]FerdinandGamerMarcospls add Burgundian Marcos into TNO😭😭 15 points 5 days ago
    Literally just Anime-con but for Schizotards like us
    permalinkembedsavereportgive awardreply

    [–]Dumugian 2 points an hour ago
    They aren’t on Wikipedia, it is basically a communist party from Brazil, they are pretty based for a communist party. FRT (Frente Revolucionária dos Trabalhadores) is their front and PCTB (Partido Comunista dos Trabalhadores Brasileiros) is their party, it is party and front at the same time. And yeah, sometimes Wikipedia is quite unfair with those things, and there are things you won’t find on Wikipedia, but rather on a deep Google research or even searching for documents or on specific websites. and I learned that nowadays.
    permalinkembedsaveparentreportgive awardreply
    [–]DigitaImessiah 1 point an hour ago
    Alright, thank you!
    permalinkembedsaveparentreportgive awardreply

    [–]JuamJoestar 4 points 3 days ago
    Tabby what do you think about NFT’s?
    permalinkembedsaveparentreportgive awardreply
    [–]DigitaImessiah 5 points 3 days ago
    They are wretched. There is research going on in cyberchristian circles that indicates they may actually be demonic in nature. NFTs are the deepest manifestationof greed. If would sell a picture of a monkey you would also sell you grandmother
    permalinkembedsaveparentreportgive awardreply
    [–]SomeRando-24Organization of Gamer Nations[S] 3 points 2 days ago
    What do you think of Valery Sablin?
    permalinkembedsaveparentreportgive awardreply
    [–]DigitaImessiah 3 points 2 days ago
    From what i can gather he was a soviet naval officers that started a leninist revolt against the ussr. Rebelling against the rotten state of terror that was the soviet union is a good thing, but communism is not the solution to communism. Lenin is the man who single handedly ruined russia by killing the tsar and his son Alexei and plunged russia into a century of darkness which it could only begin to recover from under vladimir putin (although putin is a bit too western and cucked for my liking)
    permalinkembedsaveparentreportgive awardreply
    [–]SomeRando-24Organization of Gamer Nations[S] 3 points 2 days ago
    Also what is your opinion on George Wallace
    permalinkembedsaveparentreportgive awardreply
    continue this thread
    [–]SomeRando-24Organization of Gamer Nations[S] 2 points 2 days ago
    Ok now What is your Opinion of the Russian Monarchist Movements as well as the unrelated Russian Nazbol Party?
    permalinkembedsaveparentreportgive awardreply
    continue this thread
    [–]Dumugian 1 point an hour ago
    Yeah, NFTs are cursed and demonic, not just NFTs, but most of the human popular culture, just look to companies like Atlus, Santa Monica Studio, CapCom, Bethesda, Supermassive Games, Maltakreuz (not a company but worthy of mentioning), Ubisoft, Marvel, DC… All of them are greedy, human supremacist (or furry supremacist, as in the case of Maltakreuz), neoliberal, capitalist, racist, imperialist and everything like that. And also social media like Quora, TikTok, Instagram, Discord, YouTube, Facebook and even R3dd1t itself are also demonic by nature, just look how many atheist zealots exist on those medias, same way on Wikipedia and Google.
    permalinkembedsaveparentreportgive awardreply
    [–]DigitaImessiah 1 point an hour ago
    I completely agree. the very core of our society is fundamentally rotten by satanism.
    permalinkembedsaveparentreportgive awardreply
    [–]Dumugian 1 point an hour ago
    And I even dare to say that modern human supremacism and related are rotten by satanism, but they replace satanism and Satan by human things, like human characters and human culture. Just like happens on the companies I mentioned there on my comment.
    permalinkembedsaveparentreportgive awardreply
    continue this thread

    nível 1
    DigitaImessiah
    ·
    há 2 meses
    I am not really fascist either, i am more of a traditionalist theocrat. I want the church to be the highest institution in the american country, with all non-christian institutions banned. I want to tear down Jefferson’s wall and install a paternalistic dictatorship to rid america of degeneracy.

    16

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    nível 2
    Comentário removido pela moderação
    ·
    há 2 meses

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 3
    DigitaImessiah
    ·
    há 2 meses
    Sounds based. I agree with your point about distributism. Capitalism is a wretched (possibly demonic) system that has allowed for the rise of unimaniable degeneracy. My Ideal economic system would be a revitalized form of Feudalism, though i care more about the social order than economics.

    8

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 4
    JuamJoestar
    ·
    há 2 meses
    Tabby what do you think about NFT’s?

    5

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 5
    DigitaImessiah
    ·
    há 2 meses
    They are wretched. There is research going on in cyberchristian circles that indicates they may actually be demonic in nature. NFTs are the deepest manifestationof greed. If would sell a picture of a monkey you would also sell you grandmother

    7

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    nível 6
    [deleted]
    ·
    há 2 meses
    Yeah, NFTs are cursed and demonic, not just NFTs, but most of the human popular culture, just look to companies like Atlus, Santa Monica Studio, CapCom, Bethesda, Supermassive Games, Maltakreuz (not a company but worthy of mentioning), Ubisoft, Marvel, DC… All of them are greedy, human supremacist (or furry supremacist, as in the case of Maltakreuz), neoliberal, capitalist, racist, imperialist and everything like that. And also social media like Quora, TikTok, Instagram, Discord, YouTube, Facebook and even R3dd1t itself are also demonic by nature, just look how many atheist zealots exist on those medias, same way on Wikipedia and Google.

    3

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 7
    DigitaImessiah
    ·
    há 2 meses
    I completely agree. the very core of our society is fundamentally rotten by satanism.

    3

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    nível 8
    [deleted]
    ·
    há 2 meses
    And I even dare to say that modern human supremacism and related are rotten by satanism, but they replace satanism and Satan by human things, like human characters and human culture. Just like happens on the companies I mentioned there on my comment.

    2

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 9
    DigitaImessiah
    ·
    há 2 meses
    What exactly do you mean by human supremacism? Like the vegan concept of speciecism?

    3

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    nível 1
    DigitaImessiah
    ·
    há 2 meses
    What exactly do you mean by human supremacism? Like the vegan concept of speciecism?

    3

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    nível 2
    [deleted]
    ·
    há 2 meses
    I mean like Imperium of Man concept of human supremacism and speciesism, xenospeciesism and such

    2

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 3
    DigitaImessiah
    ·
    há 2 meses
    Do you believe in extraterrestrial life?

    3

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    nível 4
    [deleted]
    ·
    há 2 meses
    Yes, and also some of them include gods and spiritual beings as extraterrestrials, just like Marvel terrorists and DC terrorists actually do.

    2

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 5
    DigitaImessiah
    ·
    há 2 meses
    Interesting. The general consesus amongst christian theologians is that heaven is a whole seperate dimension from ours, but i have heard people argue that heaven is actually in space.

    2

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    nível 6
    [deleted]
    ·
    há 2 meses
    It looks like the whole discussion I have with my anunnakist friends about An’s Heaven (Upper Heavens) and the lower heavens, and the general consensus and according to the Mesopotamian mythology, the heavens are a whole separate dimension. But at the same time they are connected to our dimension.

    1

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    nível 2
    [deleted]
    ·
    há 2 meses
    The concept of speciesism I refer is mostly like the concept of xenophobia of 40K Imperium of Man, that is the why I call it xenospeciesism, for people have a reference about that.

    2

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    DigitaImessiah
    ·
    há 2 meses
    I am not really fascist either, i am more of a traditionalist theocrat. I want the church to be the highest institution in the american country, with all non-christian institutions banned. I want to tear down Jefferson’s wall and install a paternalistic dictatorship to rid america of degeneracy.

    15

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    nível 2
    Comentário removido pela moderação
    ·
    há 2 meses

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 3
    DigitaImessiah
    ·
    há 2 meses
    Sounds based. I agree with your point about distributism. Capitalism is a wretched (possibly demonic) system that has allowed for the rise of unimaniable degeneracy. My Ideal economic system would be a revitalized form of Feudalism, though i care more about the social order than economics.

    8

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 4
    JuamJoestar
    ·
    há 2 meses
    Tabby what do you think about NFT’s?

    5

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 5
    DigitaImessiah
    ·
    há 2 meses
    They are wretched. There is research going on in cyberchristian circles that indicates they may actually be demonic in nature. NFTs are the deepest manifestationof greed. If would sell a picture of a monkey you would also sell you grandmother

    9

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 6
    SomeRando-24
    OP
    ·
    há 2 meses
    Organization of Gamer Nations
    What do you think of Valery Sablin?

    4

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 7
    DigitaImessiah
    ·
    há 2 meses
    From what i can gather he was a soviet naval officers that started a leninist revolt against the ussr. Rebelling against the rotten state of terror that was the soviet union is a good thing, but communism is not the solution to communism. Lenin is the man who single handedly ruined russia by killing the tsar and his son Alexei and plunged russia into a century of darkness which it could only begin to recover from under vladimir putin (although putin is a bit too western and cucked for my liking)

    5

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 8
    SomeRando-24
    OP
    ·
    há 2 meses
    Organization of Gamer Nations
    Also what is your opinion on George Wallace

    4

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 9
    DigitaImessiah
    ·
    há 2 meses
    ·
    editado às há 2 meses
    Don’t know much about him but he did good work defending segregation. Shame the southern patriots lost to the civil rights terrorists and that fake christian Michael “martin luther” king.

    2

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Continuar na discussão

    nível 1
    DigitaImessiah
    ·
    há 2 meses
    ·
    editado às há 2 meses
    Don’t know much about him but he did good work defending segregation. Shame the southern patriots lost to the civil rights terrorists and that fake christian Michael “martin luther” king.

    2

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 2
    SomeRando-24
    OP
    ·
    há 2 meses
    Organization of Gamer Nations
    ………………

    Ok?

    Next question

    Opinion on Francis Parker Yockey and Oswald Spengler?

    2

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 3
    DigitaImessiah
    ·
    há 2 meses
    I condemn Yockey’s antisemitism as i belive jews and christians to be brothers (as long as atheism still exists). Otherwise he was a pretty good guy and a role model to all true american patriots. Spengler was a magnificant thinker which i admire greatly. All of his predictions came more or less true, and i fully agree with his criticisms of both democracy and naziism.

    2

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 4
    SomeRando-24
    OP
    ·
    há 2 meses
    Organization of Gamer Nations
    How can Yockey be a role model for American Patriots when he was very Anti-American?

    2

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 5
    DigitaImessiah
    ·
    há 2 meses
    You are right. I also just found out that yockey collaborated with the ussr. what a disgusting filthy joke of a “nationalist”.

    3

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 6
    SomeRando-24
    OP
    ·
    há 2 meses
    Organization of Gamer Nations
    He was really more of a Nazbol considering his belief that the Far Left and Right should team up Against Liberalism, he was also comically racist despite believing that race didn’t exist. He was also kind of a Pan European Nationalist

    3

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 6
    SomeRando-24
    OP
    ·
    há 2 meses
    Organization of Gamer Nations
    Although staying on topic for a second, What are your views on things Pan-Europeanism Nationalism and Eurasianism?

    3

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 7
    DigitaImessiah
    ·
    há 2 meses
    Sorry for the late respones but i really like pan-european nationalism, standing together with your brothers against the various threats facing europe is a really good thing to do. Eurasianism is also cool

    3

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 8
    SomeRando-24
    OP
    ·
    há 2 meses
    Organization of Gamer Nations
    Ok

    Next question

    Opinion on Nick Land and Accelerationism?

    2

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 9
    DigitaImessiah
    ·
    há 2 meses
    I am against accelerationism as i believe that the current systems of capitalism and wokeism do not have a “natural end” so to speak. Rather because of their demonic nature these systems, shall they triumph fully, would lead to the eschatological end times.

    3

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 10
    SomeRando-24
    OP
    ·
    há 2 meses
    Organization of Gamer Nations
    Ok now

    What about Nick Land himself?

    2

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Continuar na discussão

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 8
    SomeRando-24
    OP
    ·
    há 2 meses
    Organization of Gamer Nations
    Also what is CyberChristianity?

    2

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 9
    DigitaImessiah
    ·
    há 2 meses
    ·
    editado às há 2 meses
    Cyberchristianity is a brand new branch of theology which delves into the connection between spirituality and technology, the digital and the divine if you will. One of the primary cyberchristian theories was developed by software developer and proto-cyberchristian Terry Davis, who posited that the third temple of God would be built in the digital realm. He tried construct said temple by developing his own operating system “TempleOS”. While he failed in his endeavor, i still admire Davis deeply and he is one of my primary role models.

    Some cyberchristians even believe that cybernetic enhancements will bring us closer to God, as machines are unable to sin.

    2

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    nível 4
    [deleted]
    ·
    há 2 meses
    u/DigitaImessiah are you an anti-atheist?

    2

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 5
    DigitaImessiah
    ·
    há 2 meses
    I would consider myself strongly anti-atheist yeah. I think atheism is at the heart of most of the world’s ills. It is no coincidence that the rise of atheism happened at the same time as the general decline of global stability. And now in our most deranged and unstable times ever seen, atheism is globally dominant.

    2

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    nível 6
    [deleted]
    ·
    há 2 meses
    Yes, I understand you very well. I am strongly anti-atheist and a harsh critic of atheism as well, I have wrote tons of criticisms of atheism and criticisms of materialism, and I have wrote so many things against anti-atheism that I fear Reddit is gonna permaban this account because of that. But good points you have.

    3

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 7
    DigitaImessiah
    ·
    há 2 meses
    Reddit really loves to ban anyone that is even mildly anti-atheist. I had my old account banned after i made a single post agianst r/religiousfruitcake (subreddit for atheists to bully religious people)

    3

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    nível 8
    [deleted]
    ·
    há 2 meses
    Quora is not different than that, Quora removes all questions that have the word “antiatheist”, and they only allow “anti-atheist”, and also the answers are very atheistic and the atheist zealots there get crazy, and also most of answers to my questions against atheist zealots and atheist extremists are completely toxic and a cesspool, in English, Portuguese, Spanish, French, German, Italian, Dutch… In literally all languages I have posted such questions on Quora.

    3

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 9
    DigitaImessiah
    ·
    há 2 meses
    Yeah, big tech censorship is hardcore. Truly it is far more repressive than any “dictatorship” “empire” ever was.

    3

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    nível 10
    [deleted]
    ·
    há 2 meses
    You are really right, I have wrote a lot about that on my comments you can find on FRT/PCTB blogs I sent you on DM, but you will have to look through the pages for find them, and there are tons of them. And I translate them into a lot of languages as well. Still well FRT/PCTB is one of the very few leftists who deserve some respect, despite sometimes they do their own mistakes. At least they allow myself to express myself and such.

    2

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    nível 10
    [deleted]
    ·
    há 2 meses
    And also, I have just reminded there are lots of totalitarian atheists and ingsoc atheists out there, yes, I have found a Discord server filled with them, it is the most disgusting thing I have found here. And big tech even help them to promote their views and such, it is very disgusting and even make me seriously hate and despise totalitarian atheism and ingsoc atheism.

    2

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    nível 8
    [deleted]
    ·
    há 2 meses
    Yeah, I also hate this subreddit, I was mocked by a crypto-atheist who pretended to be a Mesopotamian neopagan and then he triggered my bipolar disorder. And yes, I know this subreddit very well, and they still cancelled me just because I called them atheists. And yes, they are all atheists and crypto-atheists who bully religious people who are sure of what they believe.

    2

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 9
    DigitaImessiah
    ·
    há 2 meses
    Truly r/religiousfruitcake is one of the worst places on this webiste. A true testament to how cucked this website is. What make me the most mad are the crypto-atheists you mentioned. people who pretend to be religious in order to preach atheist values to their “brothers”. r/openchristian is an example of that.

    2

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    nível 2
    [deleted]
    ·
    há 2 meses
    Yeah, I agree that civil rights are somehow terrorists, same way for NATO terrorists, Ukrainian terrorists, Zelenskite terrorists, popular culture terrorists, mass media terrorists, scientistic/”scientific” terrorists, atheist terrorists, antitheist terrorists and their fake leaders and their fake idols.

    2

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 3
    DigitaImessiah
    ·
    há 2 meses
    i agree cultural terrorism is a massive issue, but the civil rights movement burned down cities and looted innocent stores, much like blm thugs today

    3

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    nível 4
    [deleted]
    ·
    há 2 meses
    Yeah, I indeed agree about the BLM thugs, they are far from being as I thought when I wrote about NAAZ (North America Autonomous Zone), but that is okay since NAAZ is somewhate like their CSA (from Kaiserreich) and also their own TNOized alternate history. And yeah, I do not regret doing so because that was funny and it is still really funny, mainly imagining such alternate histories with those thugs like BLM ones who are all neoliberals making revolutionary LARP.

    3

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 4
    HornkneeFak
    ·
    há 2 meses
    Alexei or Alexain’t
    Well Prehaps Segregation was a Shit Thing

    1

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 5
    DigitaImessiah
    ·
    há 2 meses
    Perhaps, but the civil rights movement disrupted a natural hierarchy and commited innumerable acts of terrorism. The negative impact of the civil rights movement was much larger than that of segregation.

    1

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 6
    HornkneeFak
    ·
    há 2 meses
    Alexei or Alexain’t
    You cant just fucking support a system that Discriminates People of Colour.

    I can assure you MLK was more of a Christian than any of those Vile “Christian” American Segregationists were.

    Dosent Christianity say that Skin Colour Matters not?

    2

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 7
    DigitaImessiah
    ·
    há 2 meses
    MLK has plagiarized his dissertation in order to get a phony degree in theology. Segregation was bad, but the civil rights terrorists burned down and looted entire cities, much like the blm thugs of today.

    3

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    nível 1
    DigitaImessiah
    ·
    há 2 meses
    The russian monarchist movement is based. Don’t know about nazbols though.

    3

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 2
    SomeRando-24
    OP
    ·
    há 2 meses
    Organization of Gamer Nations
    Well if you wanna look into them https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Bolshevik_Party

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Other_Russia_of_E._V._Limonov

    2

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    SomeRando-24
    OP
    ·
    há 2 meses
    Organization of Gamer Nations
    Hm ok

    Next question

    Do you believe the current situation will lead to a global war of some sort?

    2

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 2
    DigitaImessiah
    ·
    há 2 meses
    It is hard to tell really. On one hand i believe the cuckolded west is too cowardly to start a war. On the other hand they will do everything in their power to stop russia from liberating ukraine from degeneracy and secularism. I really wonder about the theological implications of a nuclear war. On one hand it may usher in the end times (ICBMs == Wormwood). On the other hand a complete destruction of all human institutions and states may lead to a revitalization of a christian faith and the establishment of a new theocratic movement. Perhaps even a return to feudalism.

    2

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 3
    SomeRando-24
    OP
    ·
    há 2 meses
    Organization of Gamer Nations
    Oh my….

    Alright I guess, next question

    Opinion on Azov Battalion?

    2

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 4
    DigitaImessiah
    ·
    há 2 meses
    I disagree with their antisemitism and think they fight on the wrong side of the conflict, but i admire their love for their country and their will to defend it tooth and nail. I really love the OUN too, sad ukraine is so chucked nowadays.

    1

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 5
    SomeRando-24
    OP
    ·
    há 2 meses
    Organization of Gamer Nations
    Ok

    Next question

    Opinion on H.P. Lovecraft?

    2

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 6
    DigitaImessiah
    ·
    há 2 meses
    I like some of his stories but i don’t like the man himself since he was a staunch atheist and his works helped revitalize paganism. And by that i mean those quirky r/WitchesVsPatriarchy types who are crypto-atheists but pretend to believe in pagan Gods (DEMONS) in an attempt to “own” christians

    2

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 7
    SomeRando-24
    OP
    ·
    há 2 meses
    Organization of Gamer Nations
    Ironically enough though Im pretty sure that subreddit would hate him due to his racism

    2

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 7
    SomeRando-24
    OP
    ·
    há 2 meses
    Organization of Gamer Nations
    Anyways next question

    What is your opinion on Post Humanism?

    2

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 8
    DigitaImessiah
    ·
    há 2 meses
    It’s quite complex. Cyberchristianity has a lot of overlap with posthumanism, there’s the aforementioned theory about enhancements, but some cyberchristians also argue that mind-uploading could be the pathway to becoming entirely spiritual beings, free from sins of the flesh.

    Personally though while these theories are very interesting to me, and i believe the digital has great potential for spirituality, i still believe that we were made in God’s image, and that we should not mess with the Lord’s creation.

    3

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 9
    SomeRando-24
    OP
    ·
    há 2 meses
    Organization of Gamer Nations
    Hm ok.

    Next question

    Opinion on the Mormons?

    2

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 10
    DigitaImessiah
    ·
    há 2 meses
    They are fellow christians and brothers in christ, and i respect all religions an denominations (as long as atheism persists anyway) but i cannot agree with some of their more outlandish views.

    2

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 3
    HornkneeFak
    ·
    há 2 meses
    Alexei or Alexain’t
    Oh my god. BRUHHHHHH

    Liberating Ukraine from Degeneracy and Secularism

    Wait until you see the STD statistics in Russia.

    2

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 4
    DigitaImessiah
    ·
    há 2 meses
    Russia may not be a perfect state (putin and the orthodox church are still in the process of cleasing russia of bolshevism), but russia is much better than any western state. Much better than Zelensky’s western terrorist regime, so much is sure.

    3

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 5
    HornkneeFak
    ·
    há 2 meses
    Alexei or Alexain’t
    😐

    When the Russian Wants to Genocode Ukranians! 😳

    2

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 6
    DigitaImessiah
    ·
    há 2 meses
    How is the war of ukranian liberation any more of a genocide than what america has been doing against iraq and the taliban freedom fighters?

    3

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 7
    HornkneeFak
    ·
    há 2 meses
    Alexei or Alexain’t
    Bucha Massacare?

    2

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    Avatar do usuário
    nível 8
    DigitaImessiah
    ·
    há 2 meses
    Bucha was bad but that doesn’t change the fact that russia is fighting a war of liberation

    2

    u/DigitaImessiah
    •Enviado por
    u/DigitaImessiah
    há 24 dias

    Leaving behind the satanic web
    Hello everyone. I have long abstained from using satanic platforms such as twitter, Facebook or Instagram. The reason behind this is that i belive they are designed to pollute your soul and sedate the masses. Recently though, i came to the realization that the platforms i have been using, namely reddit, discord and windows, are jsut as satanic. This is unacceptable, which is why i have decided that, at least for now, i am going to retreat from the satanic mainstream web and install TempleOS, which i will attempt to mod and develop.

    All of my moderation duties on r/HREfunny and r/Cyberchristianity will be transferred to u/Burgundy_La_Deaux. You are a great person and i firmly believe that if you put the work in you will become the greatest version of yourself. You got this.

    In fact, that is my message to everyone. Keep improving yourself and eternal happiness shall be upon you, even upon that french CIA glowie rat.

    Goodbye for now

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gzthb6gqLDY

    Responder
    Compartilhar

    https://www.reddit.com/r/NPPfunny/comments/u0wr7b/estophile_and_tabby_fan_meet/

    https://www.reddit.com/user/DigitaImessiah/comments/v1bc03/leaving_behind_the_satanic_web/

  6. Cosmic inflation is where our universe expanded so rapidly for a very brief moment of time at the big bang. The inflation phase went on for 10^-32 seconds or every 0.00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,001 seconds which was about 100 doublings meaning it doubled in size about 100 times. When this inflating material decays it converts all of that energy into matter and radiation, for inflation to start the inflating material MUST expand faster than it decays, if it expands faster than it decays this leads to a runaway affect. Inflation only ended in our part of space (our bubble universe) while other regions of space are still inflating. Once inflation, starts it never fully ends producing an infinite number of bubble universes and each bubble universe would have it’s own separate big bang event. There are new bubble universes being created all of the time at an ever increasing rate with new bubble universes being created forever. The rate that new bubble universes form increases by a factor of 2 (doubles) every 10^-32 seconds or every 0.0,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,001 seconds so insanely fast. Once bubble universes form they expand but the false vacuum background expands even faster, continuing creating room for more and more bubble universes to form, because once inflation starts it can sustain the production of new bubble universes forever this is why it is called eternal inflation, inflation never ends it ended in our part of the multiverse. Inflation is only eternal into the future and CAN NOT be eternal into the past because the multiverse CAN NOT been expanding forever until the present time. Inflation MUST of had a beginning. This solves the infinite regress problem saying what happened before that. This is how the multiverse came into existence, a zero sized multiverse with a zero radius (where there is no matter and also no space and no time) quantum tunnelled through a high energy quantum barrier to a finite sized multiverse with a finite sized radius filled with high energy false vacuum and started to inflate very rapidly this provides the beginning for the story of eternal inflation. Prior to quantum tunnelling there is no matter and also no space and no time. Quantum mechanical events do NOT necessarily need a cause just some probability. The multiverse did NOT get created it just has some earliest possible time. This is how the multiverse was created from absolutely nothing. Nothing exists outside the multiverse, the multiverse is our entire existence and everything that and will exist. With an infinite number of bubble universes being created repetitions of everything are inevitable. Your exact life you have lived so far and every other possible variation of your life will ultimately be lived an infinite number of times by other exact copies of you elsewhere in the eternally inflating multiverse. An exact copy of you has an exact copy of your brain (but not your brain), an exact copy of you has an exact copy of your consciousness (not your consciousness), an exact copy of you has an exact copy of your soul (but not your soul), an exact copy of you will think it is you even through it is NOT and an exact copy of you is randomly created from scratch. An exact copy of you lives on an exact copy of this Earth in an exact copy of our observable universe in another bubble universe elsewhere in the eternally inflating multiverse. After you die then sooner or later an exact copy of yourself will be realised somewhere else but life after (your) death is impossible as there is nowhere for the information that is you to go. After you die, you brain, consciousness and soul will no longer function and it will go kaput. In a literal sense a copy of you is you because you can’t tell the 2 yous apart and you don’t know which you you are because they both feel as they are you but in an abstract way they are not you because there is no link between the 2 yous and every you is randomly created from scratch.

  7. Cat
    2 reviews
    GB
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    5 days ago
    Obnoxious af
    It’s a place where people like to scream that they have small body-part insecurities, in the form of answering questions in the most obnoxious way possible. These sweaty people like to act as if you’ve just been graced by the heavens for *them* to answer *your* question. I’ve seen plenty of times where this subspecies bully and belittle people just because they don’t understand the question or there’s not enough detail (quora’s fault half the time), even when others have answered it just fine. Clearly they aren’t as smart as they think they are and I get second-hand embaressment for them. So, yeah, nah.

    Norma mccormack
    21 reviews
    GB
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    2 days ago
    I only entered this because some info…
    I only entered this because some info was wrong.
    Now of course get wonderful e mails, which I just
    Trash. They make it very difficult to come out.

    deadman aces
    2 reviews
    US
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    7 days ago
    I Went On Quora Years Ago And Have Not…
    I Went On Quora Years Ago And Have Not Gone Back On There Since and Had No Problems, Today I Was Reading Quotes About Conservatives Views Which Was Very derogatory, Very Nasty And Untrue when I Made Comments About Democrats, Liberals And Progressives in The Same Manner They Deleted My Post Quora Is Obviously a Leftist Democratic Liberal Operative, And Will Not Accept True Facts !!! They Are Disinformation Big Time !!!

    Arcade Alchemist
    7 reviews
    GB
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    A day ago
    Quora is a place where you don’t LEARN…
    Quora is a place where you don’t LEARN anything.

    Ok so let me explain, someone asks a question that may have UNPOPULAR answers,

    someone like myself ANSWERS correctly but has their answer deleted by moderation for “Hate speech” because the answer covers TRUTH topic on social structure and psychology or political reasoning that is NOT in line with the moderation team of Quora.

    this i have tried time and time again, they have a moderation team they flag hate speech but don’t give you a real reason.

    Now quora don’t care about HONEST answers they care about circle jerking on topic they like.

    Childish brains at big tech will find their world collapse within the next 5 years sorry but it’s how things will end up.

    now if you have a DEBATE/QUESTION site you can’t just flag answers as WRONG with no proof and use blanket HATE SPEECH if you don’t understand the answer or it upsets you cos your world view is somewhat CORRUPT this is not the fault of the users.

    GROW UP Quora, people don’t LEARN if you censor truth.

    Peter
    1 review
    GB
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Jun 13, 2022
    They will sign you in without your…
    They will sign you in without your knowledge and they definitely spying on us people ! Just leave this site .. I tis not about people there, if you think there are some dodgy ppl it is probably website owners ! You will log out and you will be logged in by them ! Checking your background !

    tim b
    36 reviews
    NL
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Jun 10, 2022
    Absolute illegal garbage site
    Absolute illegal garbage site, your extremely strongly force to make your personal preferences public, or els you cant use the site. Logged in with google account, removed it. Account still exists. Delete it? need a pasword i don’t have made yet. Then when you made it, it coincident you cant use it to delete your account. What a load of horse crap. No freedom at all, slavery, forced, aholes.

    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Jun 28, 2019
    cnt.
    Worst site ever

    Mark
    1 review
    US
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Jun 12, 2022
    Slanted Heavy-handed Censorship
    The biggest problem to me is the moderators. They biasedly give special privilege to certain types of people with certain types of viewpoints and these people use the mods to censor people with opposing viewpoints.

    Awliyah Safi
    1 review
    US
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Jun 8, 2022
    This place sucks
    This place sucks. It tolerates abuse and it tolerates stupid people to Speak. I’ve suffered from real life abuse. This site allowed someone to get a pass on abusive behavior. This site needs to be shut down. Everyones opinion is not ok.

    Michael
    3 reviews
    GB
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Jun 2, 2022
    On more than one occasion I’ve taken my…
    On more than one occasion I’ve taken my time to write a long comment and after posting it I can’t find them anywhere. To be honest with you I can’t see how it’s any different from any other social media apart from it’s hard to navigate. A waste of my time and effort.

    Dave
    1 review
    US
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Jun 10, 2022
    Very liberal hateful misinformed…
    Very liberal hateful misinformed toilet. Imagine jail in a socialist country filled with anti Trump rabbis Indians who hate you with the LGBT and you have w o u r a. Musicians doctors teachers on q o u r a are replaced with far left liberals, rabbis and guys from India mocking me.
    Q u o r a is overloaded with questions from poor oppressed fools. No one is a musician a doctor they just bash peoples musical taste. Income etc. Even if I tell people music I like, what I do I’m mocked. Q o u r a jumps the gun. How does some troll in India know my FRIENDS? How can a rabbi assume I’m a anti semite? Some random girl knows what music I like? I seen the worst on q o u r a. This guy diagnosed me and he’s not a doctor.. all angry delusional bitter miserable liberals who know everything. Adam d Angelo should be banned and working in a hotel not running this website.

    Hivgy WmYeH
    1 review
    US
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    May 26, 2022
    All I have to say is DOnT use this…
    All I have to say is DOnT use this question and answer website. I asked a question respectfully and the site restricted my question due to
    Violated their its policy. They didn’t even tell me how I violated it. When I went to ask a different question, I was immediately BLOCKED.

    Jayyyyyy
    1 review
    GB
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    May 18, 2022
    There was hundreds of hate comments…
    There was hundreds of hate comments calling travellers/gypsys pikey scum and stuff like that all I said was that is wrong etc well my comment got deleted but all the racial slurs weren’t it’s clear how hated the gypsy community is but at the end of tha day humans are humans there’s good and bad in all and the other comments should have been deleted not mine thanks quora for showing how u approve of racism in 2022

    Duten Pizdamtii
    2 reviews
    RO
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Updated May 16, 2022
    Heavily censored
    Heavily censored. Some threads seem completely fake, tailored to look good for Google searches. An extremist left wing platform. Go try to make a few posts accusing feminism of being a hypocritical sexist hate ideology towards men and sometimes even women. Your post will often get deleted within 12 hours. It seems to be random.

    Absolutely not a free speech platform. I don’t trust those who promote censorship.

    Stephen Henderson
    5 reviews
    US
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    May 11, 2022
    Every question I ask somehow violates…
    Every question I ask somehow violates their TOS. What questions have I asked? One was about clearing out bugs in a crawlspace and another was about using 4x4s for temporary support beams. I am a pretty intelligent person but I completely fail to see how those are “sensitive” topics or violates anything

    GinkgoTree
    4 reviews
    GB
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Apr 27, 2022
    Quora sucks
    Completely sickened by what I witnessed and experienced on Quora: the abject ignorance posing as erudition, unholy racism, vicious and uncalled for personal attacks. It’s very, very poorly monitored and perhaps only by bots programmed to a basic level. Some members are well-informed, kind, supportive but they’re in the minority. A site best avoided.

    m jones
    25 reviews
    GB
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Apr 27, 2022
    cant say ANYTHING
    so whever a post a reply, it disapears. not hate speech..
    just a normal comment. I corrected someone who said i was american, it disapeared. they asked what law you would like changed? posted my answer, it disapeared. i can only hope whoever runs this China centric site also disapears.

    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Updated Jan 4, 2022
    pointless
    Wow, another censorship full site from the land of the free. why bother? most of what i post is ignored. ok, i get answers soemtimes. but what i answer or reply to people has no reply, and that will be because its been deleted. im not that stupid i dont notice.
    because land of free dont like you to have opinions it dont agree with. usa fast becoming china. full of so called intellectuals who think because they have a piece of paper they are intelligent.

    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Aug 28, 2021
    this site is shockingly bad
    this site is shockingly bad. its very slow, hates free speech (i asked, why is a 17 yr old called a child when they can drive a killing machine? a perfectly valid question! censored ! deemed against rules !) also its a poorly designed site. i struggle to find anything im looking for.

    KarX Music
    2 reviews
    IQ
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Jun 1, 2022
    This banned my question plus they added…
    This banned my question plus they added quora plus which makes it less helpful especially for minor people who cant have a credit card

    lorenzo
    3 reviews
    IT
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Apr 19, 2022
    An endless unstoppable amount of spam.
    I subscribed and since then, it is an endless amount of spam. I tried to unsuscribed so many times, but no matter what, I keep on getting non relevant messages of all types. If you unsuscribe from one type of message clicking on the link at the bottom of the emails, you will get emails from another thread/type/subject or whatever excuse they invented to state that the unsuscribe action was related only to a subset of the material that quora has decided to send you. STAY AWAY!

    Alan Stein
    1 review
    CA
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Apr 10, 2022
    it’s a real bad site all the way around…
    it’s a real bad site all the way around first people on there attack you for no reason whatsoever when i was trying to help people on there others were attacking me maybe they should shut the site down then i found out one of my comments got deleted for no reason Quora says that with thier terms of service don’t ever go on there never

    Klassic Sub-Zero
    17 reviews
    US
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Updated Apr 29, 2022
    If you love America and your Constitutional Rights then don’t use Qoura because they don’t.
    Qoura supports huttburt liberals over freedom of speech and they infriged on my 1st amendment right when I only stated facts. They said I posted a hate speech, I didn’t I posted a fact that Liberals are offended by everything which is true because a liberal got upset by that. Instead of standing up for the truth they backed the liberal pansy.
    Update- I pissed off enough pansies to meet my Qouta so I left. They are an American hating company so if you love America and your constitution rights,don’t give them the time of day and let others know what a Nazi company they are.

    Catherine M Sedgwick
    2 reviews
    GB
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Apr 1, 2022
    Some Good Writers But Total Tech Tyranny
    Quora has some interesting writers, but the site itself has one of the more authoritation tech environments. They do whatever they want, don’t explain it and you have no say. Someone edited my question and made it irrelevant, and they told me that my question is not mine and users can do what they want with it, but I can’t delete it. Cuba anyone?

    Steve
    14 reviews
    GB
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Apr 17, 2022
    Makes us pay for access when we provide the content
    Quora gets its content for free by people generously answering questions but wants to monetise that and charge visitors to have access to answers I have provided! (And not pay me or other contributors!) It’s mega lame. Reddit is free. Go there instead.

    Sam
    5 reviews
    GB
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    May 18, 2022
    very bad.
    very bad.

    ive seen evidence that the CCP (china communist party) owns Quora now, ive posted a few things questioning the CCP and ive had all my posts deleted.

    Komen Cents
    5 reviews
    GB
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Apr 7, 2022
    Nincompoops
    you cant edit these dunce trolls answers. 99 percent of answers IM LOOKING FOR are useless and 99 percent of thing ive studied and already am very well educated on are being taught in the most bs way that makes no sense. And we can hardly edit anything. i guess its a trolls only club

    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Nov 22, 2020
    Here’s why quora is terrible.
    Quora super sucks (super duper) .
    I find answers to questions that don’t make sense and it frustrates me (especially in my fields of expertise ) and I cant add an answer nor comment and the questioner is being constantly misinformed. Nearly every question has wrong information in the answer. It just makes no sense in any perspective unless they’re trying to confuse us collectively purposely. If that’s not the case I have no idea wth is going on with quora. I’m not even allowed to ask questions either.

    So I can’t ask, I can’t answer, all answers here are not true, emm… why am I even here? To be told everything I do is a violation to quora? Quora… think about that maybe you’re the one violating everyone lol

    Nae’sLoveCharms PC
    1 review
    US
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Mar 20, 2022
    I liked this website until I realized…
    I liked this website until I realized that they support pedophiles and the rape of children. They will ban and delete comments that go against these acts but will not ban the ones who make post about raping and grooming children. It it truly sad and I pray that this website will either be sued, enforce stricter policy’s that protect children, or shut down completely. From what I’ve seen it needs to be shut down completely.

    Stanley Kozlowski
    1 review
    US
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Apr 14, 2022
    Quora is full of it
    I’m not here to debate about Trump but to tell you what happen .Quora Deletes my answers ,They have a ton of Trump Haters, so I give the haters a dose of there own medicine and they block me and shut me down . So Quora is 99 and 100% MORONS

    Victor R
    1 review
    US
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Mar 20, 2022
    I have never signed up for this website…
    I have never signed up for this website so-called Quora. they have sent emails that I never wanted. I have reported them as spam for over months now. I just blocked them for good. If I get another email from them I’m going to make their company look like S**t. I wish I good give a -10 for a review for them

    Hey, Trustpilot Your review contains inappropriate language. Please change the highlighted text to post your review. You konw what I think of this haha I well say what the fu** I want.

    FREEDOM OF SPEECH

    Joseph Pi
    1 review
    US
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Mar 5, 2022
    Users are exploited.
    Quora is a website where the users are the product and the users get exploited for private gain.

    Almost all the users from Quora are self help and mostly the content has to do with self esteem. I would not recommend to post your thoughts on here because some capitalist wants to use it as content and charge people. Same with wikipedia.

    BD
    3 reviews
    AU
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    May 1, 2022
    Terrible answers
    Terrible answers, upvoted by people who must not know any better. Imagine paying for this content. Stick with Reddit … it’s free and moronic answers more likely to get downvoted.

    Momchil Andonov
    36 reviews
    BG
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Feb 26, 2022
    It used to be a great site being able…
    It used to be a great site being able to find answers to random questions similarly to Reddit but now they ask for money?! For an access to a public forum? They think that the answers I see there are professional and deserve 5$ a month? A random person who studied Law at University of Prizren is answering the question “Why didn’t Russia help FR Yugoslavia?” – how is this proof that the answer will be accurate and based on historical facts, and not just an opinion of a law student?

    massa
    7 reviews
    IT
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Feb 12, 2022
    What a pity minimum 1 star not 0!
    What a pity! The minimum vote is 1 star !

    If you search for Whatsapp settings, a popup msg will ask if you are oltre than 16 or similar…. why ? Because you are entering in adulti content!

    If I click on some google search result that belongs to Quora, there are 80% chances I will enter a trublesome area

    Stay away from that site… you may slso loose your money

    LouiseB
    5 reviews
    GB
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Jun 6, 2022
    You can never seem to leave
    Terrible site. I’ve tried to leave so many times after I got hacked (it was actually more of a warning by hackers who encouraged me to change my passwords and use other security measures, not all hackers are scum and I’m normally pretty internet safe but it’s always changing) and the fact they really want you to get the app.

    I’ve actually asked my account to be deleted (not just deactivated although that seemed the only option one time). I accidentally signed up twice and tried to leave both. Well I finally thought I’d got rid years ago, the second time I tried to leave after I knew how hard it was I made sure (well thought I did) they couldn’t send me emails anymore by disabling all notifications (you have to go down a list, not an option to disable all of them at once).

    Then suddenly out of nowhere I started getting emails. Somehow I’d been signed back in by an account that should have been gone long ago and I found all my email notifications had been reselected. I had to go through it all over again and ask for my account to be deleted. I’m hoping I’ve finally got rid but I hoped that last time. Quora don’t make it easy and this company needs investigating. I’ve seen users defend them but they need to pay attention to these reviews.

    In principle it’s a good idea to have such a question and answer site but in reality it’s a mess.

    Kieren
    14 reviews
    GB
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Mar 9, 2022
    Freedom of information? Ha!!!
    Quora clearly doesn’t know what ‘freedom of information’ means. They charge people money for answers. This is unethical and unforgivable. They waited until they were popular and then put up a paywall.
    Money grabbing b######s, I hope they get put in prison for a very long time!!!

    Laila
    1 review
    SE
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Updated Mar 24, 2022
    Big warning
    Big warning. Quora is very political. They have have strong algoritm that they use on there users, the questions are often made by bot (quora) and are wierd. Like the are anti russian and anti syra and so on. Everything usa is anti quora is on it

    Liam Baker
    1 review
    US
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Feb 20, 2022
    Terrible website
    Terrible website. it allows porn and it’s hard to avoid seeing a porn pic spammed. The people that run this website seem to obviously not care about morals. Evil hateful comments seem not to be moderated at all. They seem to not delete any hateful atheists comments no matter how evil they are. Do not go on this website if you are a Christian or talk respectfully and decently. Also it is very weird to delete an account. If you accidentally sign in within 14 days of deletion they will cancel the deletion.

    Dem
    2 reviews
    IN
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Feb 18, 2022
    Awful trash site
    Awful trash site. One on my comments stated that a lot of famous cringy romance stories are written by white woman,(Twilight, Fifty shades of gray, After) and it got labelled as hate speech. While I see tons of people writing bad things about white men (I don’t really care about them either) and nothing happens.

    NH
    1 review
    US
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Mar 27, 2022
    Don’t waste your time on this site
    Quora is not a place for discussion or debate of people’s perspectives or ideas, so don’t expect to really learn anything here or to get a variety of perspectives on a topic. If you happen to disagree with someone who is too fragile to handle an opinion or perspective different from their own, they can easily have your comment deleted by the moderators, who won’t bother to confirm whether or not the comment is actually in violation of any of the site’s policies. Why waste your time posting thoughtful dissenting opinions just to have them thoughtlessly deleted? And if you can’t interact with others’ posts, then why bother using the site at all?

    d dd
    21 reviews
    DK
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Mar 25, 2022
    they rip of you email from google…
    they rip of you email from google chrome and make fake acconut whit them i have now 2 account’s on ther home page i have never ask for it and i cant delet them becures i need a password and they spam my email and i have now unsub 3 times

    Felix Cane
    8 reviews
    DE
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    May 16, 2022
    You can’t read some parts of the…
    You can’t read some parts of the discussion or perform any action, unless you download the app and make an account with settings. Annoying

    W P
    1 review
    US
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Jan 30, 2022
    This site is like reading the writing…
    This site is like reading the writing on the bathroom wall. If the mods don’t like your question or answers (reasons mysterious, vague and unexplained) you will get banned from posting. Don’t trust anything you read on this site because it could be dangerous misinformation and you have no way of verifying the accuracy of it.

    Karl
    4 reviews
    CH
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Updated Apr 16, 2022
    Rampant censorship issues!
    This platform was once pretty good but the censorship issue is getting out of hand. And I’m not even talking about racist, consipracy nutjobs or extreme political views type of content but just regular answers and comments that may contain a tiny bit of criticism. You can not have a discussion if no criticism is allowed it’s the bread and butter of democracy. This platform is becoming a authoritarian hub disconnected from any sort of reality.

    What’s even more problematic here is the fact that obvious troll articles, or people making money by spamming mindless questions that a 2s google search could answer, are happily ignored. So yeah if you censor to such an extreme degree at the very least they could censor actually problematic things and not normal dicussions.

    Hannes K
    1 review
    AT
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Jan 3, 2022
    A horrible mix of untruths
    A horrible mix of untruths, half truths and content moderation from hell.
    They pay people to ask the dumbest questions, over and over again so Google keeps ranking them for “new content”.
    There is not a single bit of quality control, moderation is by people without education.
    The only actual use of Quora is for companies to spam their advertisements, hidden as “question” or “answer”.

    Stuart
    82 reviews
    GB
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Jan 9, 2022
    Absolute Trash
    When I want to check something, normally something I know something about, up come Quora. I read some of the replies and quickly realise that the posters are predominantly clueless morons that simply express their personal opinions without evidence to back up their guesses. Quora is obviously designed for ego brain dead wasters who lack social skills.

    m jones
    25 reviews
    GB
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Updated Jan 4, 2022
    pointless
    Wow, another censorship full site from the land of the free. why bother? most of what i post is ignored. ok, i get answers soemtimes. but what i answer or reply to people has no reply, and that will be because its been deleted. im not that stupid i dont notice.
    because land of free dont like you to have opinions it dont agree with. usa fast becoming china. full of so called intellectuals who think because they have a piece of paper they are intelligent.

    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Apr 27, 2022
    cant say ANYTHING
    so whever a post a reply, it disapears. not hate speech..
    just a normal comment. I corrected someone who said i was american, it disapeared. they asked what law you would like changed? posted my answer, it disapeared. i can only hope whoever runs this China centric site also disapears.

    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Aug 28, 2021
    this site is shockingly bad
    this site is shockingly bad. its very slow, hates free speech (i asked, why is a 17 yr old called a child when they can drive a killing machine? a perfectly valid question! censored ! deemed against rules !) also its a poorly designed site. i struggle to find anything im looking for.

    gary bourton
    1 review
    GB
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Jan 13, 2022
    Rt got alot to say this place is full…
    Rt got alot to say this place is full of pedofiles and child sexualisation vile litrally there’s one where a mother is asking if it’s ok that her bf husband whatever got there five year old child to suck him of instead of spanking her for misbehaving and there was people agreeing I have ss too for everything btw and then there’s fetish groups allowing kids to post sexualised pictures of themselfs and then creepy men encouraging them to continue not been harrased yet but I wanna see them fkin try

    Aldous Huxley
    4 reviews
    US
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Updated Dec 24, 2021
    It’s garbage
    It’s a terrible site and a complete waste of time. Why spend time writing out an answer or comment just for it to be arbitrarily deleted, automatically (even though there’s no profanity or anything “bad”). I think we can all agree on that.

    But I just wanted to add that the moderation/ censorship has nothing to do with political leanings like “liberal” or “conservative.” I’m more of a democrat and they do the same things to me. It’s equal opportunity sucktitude. I will not go back.

    Canberk Hancan
    2 reviews
    US
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Updated Nov 26, 2021
    Moderated by racist corrupt republicans
    Moderated by confederate and Trump supporting, neo-nazi, racist and hateful Republican Americans who are ready to nuke the whole world. Don’t ever waste your time, if you write down anything that’s against their views, it gets deleted and they shadow ban your account. I’ve deleted my account and never coming back. Zero freedom of speech. Bunch of clowns performing a shitshow.

    Jonathan
    12 reviews
    DK
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Jan 19, 2022
    Quora is a terrible website STAY AWAY!!!!!
    Quora is a terrible website. it feels like a joke. i have no idea why anyone would want to use it. I was scammed of 250 USD through a crypto pump and dump scheme on Telegraph. The scammer is encouraging people to join. I was so dumb to do so. I reported it, but Quora deleted my comment with no explanation. And if you appeal, it cannot be undone. Many users have left the platform because it’s a fraud and it consists of bots doing the deleting of comments. Won’t recommend this crappy, fraudulent site. And you cannot trust the comments there. Please BEWARE!

    Erik Lanson
    1 review
    US
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Nov 27, 2021
    Quora censors comments unfairly
    Quora censors comments unfairly. Their “Be Nice, Be Respectful” policy is very vague and abused by administrators. This is a very left wing platform and a complete waste of time. I deleted my account because my comments, although well written and respectable, keep getting flagged by administrators. Do not waste your time on this platform.

    Suzanne Hundric
    6 reviews
    AU
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Jan 20, 2022
    It’s mostly a load of garbage
    It’s mostly a load of garbage. I’ve never posted on it or answered questions but when I’ve read questions & answers I see a lot of bashing & bullying to the questions posted. I often feel sorry for the person who wrote the question being attacked for something they wanted to seek helpful advice for. You’re always better off asking a professional doctor if medical related, professional councillor/Psycologist if mental health related, or a trusted family or friend member you can talk to. Never Quora unless you want to hear rubbish from abusers who put others down for their ego

    Tobias Rex
    5 reviews
    GB
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Nov 4, 2021
    Only opinions you’re allowed are straight white Christian men = good
    Nasty company that blocks or removes anything that criticises or points out someone’s claim about America isn’t true.
    I got “suspended” for 2 weeks but a guy threatening to Dox me and come and shoot me was apprently fine. Quora might as well have nothing but racist sexist moderators with how they treat us all if you’re not a straight white Christian man.

    Ruby Gallagher
    3 reviews
    US
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Dec 24, 2021
    I posted a “you go girl” response to a…
    I posted a “you go girl” response to a story of an elderly woman using martial Arts to fend off a friend from being attacked. I wrote simply “You Rock”. One of quotas members actually responded to “you rock” by calling me a cheeky “c” word. I looked up the profile of the name caller reported it to quora after reading their regulations. Needless to say I did not get resolution.
    On a karmic note the profile of the name caller was the ugliest trans I have ever seen. So after we picked ourselves off the floor stopped laughing drier our eyes we deleted the app.

    Oroku Saki
    13 reviews
    ZA
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Dec 8, 2021
    What an utter garbage website
    What an utter garbage website! Your comments and replies are just arbitrarily removed for no reason, even though they contain no offensive or unsubstantiated claims, while others that post false information and offensive posts get to post and reply all they want and you can’t reply to them.

    Also the people that seem to reply to questions there have the mentality of toddlers, hardly knowing anything about the topic under discussion while the knowledgeable people get their posts moderated by lunatic moderators. Avoid this dumpster fire!

    Kordon
    23 reviews
    PT
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Dec 25, 2021
    Where Dishonesty and Sycophancy Dominates
    Quora doesn’t care about people nor open-mindedness. It cares about profit only. So, it deletes answers that keep these rich jerks living in luxury during the pandemic while most people suffer via Orwellian censorship. The spam policy is a joke in this platform. “Be Nice, Be Respectful” is another joke of a policy. Adam D’Angelo is a cut-throat grifter that owns Quora to exploit people for profit, not to let them have a platform for open-minded discussions. Because he is just another cut-throat leech gaining money and power at the expense of lower class people.

    FJV
    2 reviews
    ZA
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Dec 8, 2021
    Dishonest shady company
    Dishonest company that basically run a clickbait sham. I provided a well articulated factually sound answer to a question that was asked by another user; which some I’ll informed idiot rudely disputed with utter subjective/baseless drivel because I frankly suspect I received more upvotes than him for my answer…

    but anyway, when I tried to rebut his nonsense (again with verifiable facts) my reply just never appears (only to myself)…..hardly a reliable and trustworthy source when trying to get the correct information on something…….

    Concerned Citizen
    29 reviews
    DK
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Jan 25, 2022
    Mailing list scam – cringely obvious
    They create hundreds of slightly different email accounts in order to keep you on their mailing list. If you block 1 quora email account you will not have solved the problem. You will have to continue doing that, seemingly forever, with slightly altered quora email accounts. Garbage, dead company. Will completely die soon. A shame really. The greedy owners of quora could potentially revive the company, sell it or even use their outreach to somehow keep life going for some entity, some core that has real value within quora. But they dont do that. Why dont they do that? The answer is simple. They are stupid. Unintelligent.

    Richard
    1 review
    CA
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Updated Sep 27, 2021
    Disgusting Moderators
    There was a post created by someone that was contemplating suicide, and in one of the replies someone had said to go ahead and kill themselves.

    I reported the comment, and I then received a reply from a Quora moderator that the comment didn’t break any of Quora’s guidelines. I then challenged their decision, but they denied it a second time.

    What kind of person denies the removal of a post that tells someone to kill themselves? I am disgusted by Quora.

    Cona Magrega
    1 review
    GB
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Sep 2, 2021
    Absolute joke. Communist moderators with a god complex.
    Absolute joke. They will censor you at every turn. Even if your comment violates no policy the braindead moderators will delete it if it conflicts with their views. Quora has worse moderators that any other platform in existance. Their reviews speak for themselves. They are the North Korea of social platforms. I strongly advise you to avoid this communist site/app if you want to ever have an opinion made public.

    Natalie
    2 reviews
    US
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Sep 21, 2021
    Awful staff and community
    People who put down others for asking questions or having an opinion are not disciplined whatsoever, but if you dare to call them out you will have your comment removed by the moderators. Appeals are a joke, they don’t care about their terms of service. They choose to not punish someone for harrasing people but if you dare to critique the bullies you’re silenced. 90% of the people answering questions are just there to put you down to make themselves feel better.

    Lara X
    2 reviews
    GB
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Updated Aug 30, 2021
    Absolutely Terrible
    Absolutely Terrible. They allow comments and questions for animal abuse and racism and many other bad topics.Comments and answers are very biast and one sided.Whats more is that many of the answers as also very pretentious and of fake importance. What is even more annoying is that you have to sign up to read answers. I deleted my account and will never go back.

    Gabrielle
    4 reviews
    US
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Updated Aug 10, 2021
    deletes any factual comments because it…
    deletes any factual comments because it hurts their feelings,they are abuse enablers and should really remove themselves. Deleted my comment to a nasty person mocking a teenager who was being starved by their mother. @Ryan,you probably kiss Obama’s ass sweetheart. Too bad,be a good little sheep and follow your covidiot herd to the slaughter house,the world is better off without you ♥️

    Guy Jones
    7 reviews
    GB
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Aug 8, 2021
    Like being back in nursery school
    The site run by powermad people if you say anything right if it’s goes against there believe whether you are right or wrong your answer gets deleted if you appeal again no care only Quora count here.

    Many on the site get offended over anything for example I said who caused the 2008 recession so someone reported my answer when it was proved by actual facts not just some loser online .

    Teapot_Railfan
    10 reviews
    HR
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Feb 9, 2022
    Stuff and nonsense liberal website
    How they knew my email adress when i was searching for some question in beginning of octobor 2021…. When i discovered Quora and entered their forum, in next morning already received three spam email from them which first example is: Is Mercedes better than Porsche? I’m not interested comparing cars in that (since i respect all cars) and they constantly asking the same question over and over again, sometimes they have so much nonsense that they are ridiculous to read. As much as I try to block mail, I keep getting spam mails from them.
    This is unacceptable.
    What a scam company, never using Quora ever again!
    I’ll look for questions somewere else, but not in Quora!

    Damion Keeling
    3 reviews
    NZ
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Sep 8, 2021
    They allow your feed to be spammed with…
    They allow your feed to be spammed with stupid questions that can be answered sometimes with a dictionary. The people doing it get some kind of points for generating content regardless how worthless.
    Blocking such spammers is a waste of time, Quora sends the same questions to your feed with the blocked user name set as anonymous.

    Arvind G B
    1 review
    IN
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Updated Oct 27, 2021
    Draconian moderation, stay away!
    Terrible website. I had more than 100 answers written and one day because I commented somewhere that the CCP was an evil party, they straight up banned me and deleted all the hours of investment in content I’d given this site. Goes to show where these leftist websites have their real loyalty in.

    Lee McCormack
    1 review
    US
    Rated 2 out of 5 stars
    Aug 14, 2021
    This site is no different than Twitter…
    This site is no different than Twitter they’re left leaning and they red flag any comments that are against homosexuality or any other views that are considered conservative. Basically they sensor everything you say. They say they’re going to review your comment but they never really review they just cut it out. One commenter talked about the size of his penis and that was okay. Just like Twitter anything that’s left wing leading or radical is okay.

    Kaiser
    1 review
    IN
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Jan 16, 2022
    This website is not for religious…
    This website is not for religious people.

    If you don’t agree with LGBT and state that it’s because of religious beliefs, the Quora moderators will remove your answers and delete your account because it’s against their hate speech policy.

    Padmini Ravikumar
    8 reviews
    US
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Feb 18, 2022
    THEY STOPPED ME FROM COMMENTING
    THEY STOPPED ME FROM COMMENTING, BECAUSE I WROTE A HONEST AND GENUINE COMMENT, I NEVER HURT ANYONE, I JUST TOLD THEM ABOUT THE DUTIES TO THEIR AND GRATITUDE TO PARENTS, IS THAT WRONG. PLEASE TAKE MORALS

    richard machin
    7 reviews
    GB
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Sep 21, 2021
    The most awfull overmoderated one sided…
    The most awfull overmoderated one sided site i have ever come across ,you answer a question on certain subjects from a christian point of view and immediately your comment gets deleted or collapsed for violating the be nice policy ,meanwhile anybody who writes a comment mocking religion or religious believers or saying hatefull things about god does not get their comment removed and doesnt violate policy stay away from quora it is a one sided site which has no freedom.of speech and a load of overzealous moderators.

    Mike Vasiljevs
    1 review
    AT
    Rated 2 out of 5 stars
    Updated Nov 11, 2021
    Tried unsubscribing from Gmail
    Tried unsubscribing from Gmail. Unsubscribed from emails in site settings. A bit later… guess what, I am subscribed again!

    Gmail -> spam!

    UPDATE:
    It seems I was able to unsubscribe after all, let’s see… I found different configurations for different languages!? This too confusing to most people and appears like a sort of loophole is being exploited in order to allow sending messages to the registered users who are not erudite enough to inspect every possible configuration permutation.

    So, up to two stars from one following the update with the experience.

    Helene Brueninghaus
    4 reviews
    TR
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    May 21, 2021
    Too much abuse for my liking
    I don’t like this website because if I make a comment I get British, (you can tell by the spelling), people giving very disrespectful replies. They shouldn’t be allowed to use the website. If I reply to their reply to put them straight they make an even more abusive comment and so on. When I asked my one and only question about Britain I got the warning from Quora in both English and German.

    Hannah Ettles
    3 reviews
    GB
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Feb 24, 2022
    This site is disgusting AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID!!!!!
    This site is the most disgusting site I’ve ever come across. If I could give it minus stars I bloody would. There are people who are chatting about raping children, how to rape them and how to abuse them without the children recognising it! It’s the most disgusting thing I’ve ever come across and no bloody child deserves to be abused. They do not give a crap about the children and Instead ban the people who are trying to report them. If you use this site you are contributing to this disgusting behaviour. Everyone who is involved with this are the most disgusting human beings on this planet! The people in control of quora are also bloody disgusting for allowing these disgusting practices. Sort out your god damn site!!!!!!!!

    Terminatorrrr
    10 reviews
    SY
    Rated 2 out of 5 stars
    May 4, 2021
    Bias Staff Reviewing Reported Answers/Questions
    When it comes to hot discussions, Quora’s staff are not neutral but most of the time would depend on the nationality of the staff evaluating the reports.

    They skip lots of messages and answers that either defend fascism and racism.

    Therefore, the platform is not neutral so don’t expect much from it when it comes to political and religious discussions. The staff are Israelis.

    John Q Public
    1 review
    US
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Jul 5, 2021
    Wow, just filled to the brim with incompetent crap
    If you’re a complete moron that does none of your own personal research, then this site is for you. It is totally filled with absolute BS. Honestly, it’s completely mind blowing how any dolts think they have a brain. Filled with millennial numb-nuts that haven’t the first clue about history, economics or even truth of any kind.

    Neno Svjetlanovic
    13 reviews
    BA
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Aug 5, 2021
    Scammers
    Scammers at quora will force you to make account just to read their useless article if you find it in google results. These scammers should be completely banned from google results considering their tactic to force people to make profile. When you make profile, they will spam you with mails even when you disable email notifications. You dont even have option to delete profile. These people should be ashamed for doing such a thing to people who contribute and site should be banned. it is useless anyway

    C J
    2 reviews
    CA
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Updated Apr 12, 2021
    Quora is seriously the worst idea
    Quora is seriously the worst idea. They require you to register on their website in order to read the articles, which is already tedious in itself. As for the articles, they are almost always the ramblings of a pseudointellectual pretending to be a subject matter expert and contain inaccurate or outright false information. Also, I cannot unsubscribe for some reason….

    wayne
    18 reviews
    GB
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Mar 27, 2021
    Censorship and behavioural manipulaton platform….
    Just another Big Tech censorship and echo chamber platform.
    They have no issue with suggesting murder and terrorism of people going against covid “rules” but bans you for calling those fascists what they are…..
    They are clearly pushing the woke agenda and are used by regimes for behavioural manipulation and propaganda.
    77 Brigade from britain are huge fans of the platform which say’s it all really.

    Bright Light
    1 review
    US
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    May 29, 2021
    Worse administration ever
    Worse administration ever, but no surprise, it’s all propaganda towards the extreme left. Any comments against the narrative, even if it’s factual, will be banned and disabled for anyone to post again. Terrible place to post if you don’t agree with their agendas. No 1st amendment rights are practiced on this site. Don’t waste your time.

    Ancel
    4 reviews
    ZA
    Rated 2 out of 5 stars
    Mar 2, 2021
    Political correctness on steroids
    Even though there is some old, useful info from that site, regarding certain topics, which is why I gave it an extra star, after testing an account with that site, I started to wonder how people survive, without being suspended or banned repeated, and how people structure politically-correct questions.
    The censorship is like Reddit’s. I heard, that the only people, who use quora, are people who work at Quora. That company should be taken down.

    caz
    1 review
    US
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Feb 15, 2022
    went on to find a answer because it was…
    went on to find a answer because it was showing up like 100 times. that i am fine with but this where the dumpster fire starts. i need to get a overpriced subscription that i will never use agian.
    awaful

    m jones
    25 reviews
    GB
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Aug 28, 2021
    this site is shockingly bad
    this site is shockingly bad. its very slow, hates free speech (i asked, why is a 17 yr old called a child when they can drive a killing machine? a perfectly valid question! censored ! deemed against rules !) also its a poorly designed site. i struggle to find anything im looking for.

    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Apr 27, 2022
    cant say ANYTHING
    so whever a post a reply, it disapears. not hate speech..
    just a normal comment. I corrected someone who said i was american, it disapeared. they asked what law you would like changed? posted my answer, it disapeared. i can only hope whoever runs this China centric site also disapears.

    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Updated Jan 4, 2022
    pointless
    Wow, another censorship full site from the land of the free. why bother? most of what i post is ignored. ok, i get answers soemtimes. but what i answer or reply to people has no reply, and that will be because its been deleted. im not that stupid i dont notice.
    because land of free dont like you to have opinions it dont agree with. usa fast becoming china. full of so called intellectuals who think because they have a piece of paper they are intelligent.

    Tristan Banks
    14 reviews
    GB
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Jul 1, 2021
    Run by Zionists
    Quora is run by zionists who allow fascist nonsense to propagate on their website. If you speak out against this, they delete your comments and give no reason.
    I will not support an organisation that promotes ethnic cleansing and international law violations and silences those who speak out against it.

    Abhinav S
    14 reviews
    IN
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Updated Aug 20, 2021
    WASTE OF TIME- (this phrase doesn’t do justice)
    To call it a knowledge sharing website is such a joke that I can’t express this in words.
    Very cheap website which just wants to addict people. Everyone from the staff to the users are nasty.
    Believe me, it’s so so bad that I think writing about it itself is a criminal waste of time.

    M. A.
    1 review
    US
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Feb 23, 2021
    A dangerous far-right propaganda machine
    A dangerous far-right platform which glorifies racism, violance, and pornography.
    Quora is the personal propganda machine of Bill Gates who uses Quora to spread medical misinformation and advertisement for pharmaceutical companies. The company frequently breaches his own policy. Complaint issued with attorney General in State Carlifornia.

    Samantha Teal
    4 reviews
    ZA
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Apr 9, 2021
    Run a Toxic community that violated GDPR & Emailing spam laws
    Quora has hired a full array of toxic and horrid “moderators”

    They automatically update their emailing system and suddenly your email preferences are updated without your knowledge and the spam just pours into your inbox in an unending stream.

    Complaints to the company are just met with them canceling your account all together if you just want to opt out of 90% of the emails. And you never get a reply on WHY YOUR PREFERANCE SETTINGS WERE UPDATED WITHOUT YOUR KNOWLEDGE NOR PERMISSION

    Ella Carol Campeau
    1 review
    CA
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Mar 9, 2021
    Don’t go to quora
    I have reached out to quora about 6 times in the past year and have not got a response, also it’s not letting me answer, put a question out or comment. I’m a honest person and all I have to say is don’t get quora. Also I almost got hacked and they didn’t care. I have been trying to contact them to say delete my account.

    pillar flame
    1 review
    AU
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Jun 4, 2021
    Not a Good website if you want lots of…
    Not a Good website if you want lots of responses or replies because you will never get a reply or any response. waste of my time. you tube is even better and even on you tube I get responses very rarely.
    at least I know in a forum I get responses But this website 0 responses. waste of time.

    Balázs Nagy
    2 reviews
    GB
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Feb 22, 2021
    This website is a joke
    This website is a joke. The peoples using it anonymously to mock other ethnic, racial, religious groups, and the moderation team do nothing, but If you wrote down the word “trolling” in one of your answers, they delete it in 5 minutes. Also, peoples could edit and re-write other people’s questions at any time.

    Ellis Rodriguez
    3 reviews
    US
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Oct 8, 2021
    Quora is run by Anti-Christian/Conservative Moderators
    I was on Quora for a couple of years and wrote many helpful replies to other persons world wide until I found out how Anti-Christian/Conservative Quora Moderators are.

    More than once when a person wrote me an offensive reply and I replied exactly the same way using the same words, Quora censored my reply but let the other offensive remark without censoring.

    I did challenge the censorship and the only excuse I got from Quora Moderators is that they stand with their decision. No explanation given.

    After that I deleted my Quora account due to their pagan bias against Christians and Conservatives in general.

    trigger25
    52 reviews
    IE
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Sep 3, 2021
    SUCH A BULLSH-T SITE.
    Have watched an African lady being sexually assaulted and a prisoner being executed in Germany but when i posted a warning about a scammer my post was taken down, Nice to see where these idi-ts priorities are.
    HAVE UNSUBSCRIBED, SICK OF THEIR BULLSH-T SITE.

    Joy Powell
    1 review
    US
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Jul 18, 2021
    Beware of Quora
    Beware of Quora. Anyone can offer advice on this. Someone I know, for example, is completely off base in her assessments of others yet is on this as a frequent contributor. This person has absolutely no training in this area and instead had a career as a bookkeeper for a fast-food chain. She is on high levels of fentanyl for pain and has been flat-out wrong in her judgments of others, and she has emotional problems along with a tendency to feel envy and gossip. She cyber stalks. It alarmed me to see that she frequently is “advising” people who have relationship problems.

    Anonymous User
    3 reviews
    US
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Updated Oct 27, 2021
    As a atheist any anti theist post I…
    As a atheist any anti theist post I write is immediately deleted or moderated. I never attack the person I only attack ideas . Yet I’ve been Banned over 100 times . Luckily I have a temp email app so I can create a new account in 5 minutes

    A D
    1 review
    RS
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Apr 15, 2021
    For no reason at all
    For no reason at all, I’m blocked immediately after starting some normal topic? It did not violate anything, so I’m still forbidden to answer any topic, follow anyone, and out of those 120 people I follow when I click to view my list, it is empty, yet displays 120 people? Weird company.

    Yasmin McEwen
    13 reviews
    US
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Mar 19, 2021
    Quora has been a serious nightmare…
    Quora has been a serious nightmare of an entity that will not stop Spamming me.
    I never signed up. I never joined any of their threads. Never commented. Never go to Quora for anything. And I never will.
    I don’t know how they got my email. I have unsubscribed from them a bunch of times and nothing works. They send me horrible CRUEL EMAILS ABOUT CREMATION AND PEOPLE DYING. I wish Quora had an ounce of integrity but they clearly do not. I question both the legitimacy of this company and feel they are harassing me nonstop for no reason.

    Anee Nigma
    23 reviews
    GB
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Updated Mar 10, 2021
    Where is the honour in this website…
    Where is the honour in a website that blatantly allows questions for the sale of Trust Pilot reviews, allows questions that have URLs with decidedly dodgy links as the question putting their users at risk of having their equipment compromised by hackers.

    There seems to be a desire to monitize the site by paid adverts but in doing so has drifted from the essence of the original mission of the site.

    All the serious content providers have left leaving just the dross, sadly.

    If I could have given a zero star I most certainly would.

    John Smith
    3 reviews
    GB
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Feb 16, 2021
    My truthful comment was removed
    My correct comment was removed, claimed it violated their policy but they wouldn’t answer my question as to why? I still have no idea, obviously they’re a mouthpiece of the left. Say something correct, that they don’t like, and they’ll delete your comment. It’s just a propaganda site, sadly.

    Josh Grey
    1 review
    IE
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Updated Apr 15, 2021
    SPAM EMAILS
    SPAM EMAILS SPAM EMAILS SPAM EMAILS
    SPAM EMAILS SPAM EMAILS SPAM EMAILS
    SPAM EMAILS SPAM EMAILS SPAM EMAILS
    SPAM EMAILS SPAM EMAILS SPAM EMAILS
    SPAM EMAILS SPAM EMAILS SPAM EMAILS
    SPAM EMAILS SPAM EMAILS SPAM EMAILS
    Remove me from your email list, I’ve unsubscribed over 10 times.

    Mr Ray Pooley
    9 reviews
    GB
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    May 7, 2021
    I’ve had the account for many years…
    I’ve had the account for many years just didn’t use it. Then about 7 months ago I logged in and started answering questions.

    What I have noticed is that by far the majority of the questions I read make no sense at all. It’s as if they are generated by bots. I have answered 615 questions so far without a single acknowledgement or response from the person who asked the question. Are they not allowed to respond? If not that would explain it. Otherwise I guess bots can’t read your responses. It’s a one way conversation in that respect. I’m not sure it’s 100% legit.

    Nickos Lekkas
    1 review
    GR
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    May 26, 2021
    Quora is a dumpster fire
    Quora is a dumpster fire, while the idea itself wasn’t bad those kind of sites require community moderation which sadly doesn’t exist.

    Your answers will get deleted by mods without any explanation while blatantly offensive and misleading post will stay up. Site is also primarily used as a propaganda tool so anything you read in it requires some digging to verify if it is completely made up or actual facts.

    If you want to learn about something and you can’t get a book on the subject you are better off trusting wiki over this mess.
    I give Quora a propaganda troll/10

    Donald Black
    1 review
    US
    Rated 1 out of 5 stars
    Feb 14, 2021
    Quora is a place of Racism…..If you…
    Quora is a place of Racism…..If you are a person of color you can write anything about who ever and not get Blocked. That is not the case if your White , Quora is a site that wants to shame Whites and to promote people of color . It’s time to stop the poor , poor Black Race .

    1. selim korycki
      2 reviews
      DE
      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      Feb 13, 2021
      Avoid creating an account with Quora…
      Avoid creating an account with Quora unless you’re looking towards receiving endless amount of spam email. Unsubscribed from their mailing list about 5 times now, and yet the unwanted emails keep on coming. I just spent 5 minutes deleting my account, hopefully this will help.

      Izzy Miler
      3 reviews
      US
      Rated 2 out of 5 stars
      Sep 3, 2021
      They really love to ignore people
      They really love to ignore people. I was asking Is Super Sentai for Kids? Always I get is annoying super hero quora review question like how Superman defeat Batman? . Witch not dealing with any my question. I ‘m sick tired of those things.

      Christina Kelly
      1 review
      US
      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      Mar 1, 2021
      Seized My Account To Extort Me
      This website took hold of my account of multiple years, demanded I change my name, and then tried to extort personal data out of me after I did. They wanted a LinkedIn profile and Facebook profile before giving my account back. Why the f*** would they need more personal information from me after forcing me to use my real name? Not only that, but there are several instances of them deleting my comments for no reason other than the fact that I was standing up to abusive people on their platform. Do not use, it is worse than 4chan, they just hide it and protect the horrible people.

      Neno Svjetlanovic
      13 reviews
      BA
      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      Oct 17, 2021
      Dont ever make profile on this spam…
      Dont ever make profile on this spam site, imbeciles will force you to make profile to see something on their stupid site and there is no way to turn off email notifications. Imbecilic site with imbecilic people working on it

      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      Aug 5, 2021
      Scammers
      Scammers at quora will force you to make account just to read their useless article if you find it in google results. These scammers should be completely banned from google results considering their tactic to force people to make profile. When you make profile, they will spam you with mails even when you disable email notifications. You dont even have option to delete profile. These people should be ashamed for doing such a thing to people who contribute and site should be banned. it is useless anyway

      Roderik Turksema
      1 review
      NL
      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      May 5, 2021
      They keep sending spam emails
      They keep sending spam emails. I have unsubscribed 7 times. Followed online tutorials on how to unsubscribe but every week or so I get a new email about a new service. Stay far away from this site. I cannot stress enough how much I now hate this company.

      Dave Barron
      1 review
      US
      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      May 20, 2021
      I get a little pissed off when a…
      I get a little pissed off when a company says I signed up for their service. BS then get email every day. And when I tried to delete account it’s obvious that is not easy.. scam company collecting data to sell…
      Not happy… put all emails to junk folder

      Lavina Dilley
      1 review
      US
      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      Jul 28, 2021
      I deleted my account because moderators…
      I deleted my account because moderators are extremely bias, seems all they want is an echo chamber, and not open to any other opinions/views and will delete your comment in a heartbeat while the other party continues to write essays.

      National Treasure
      8 reviews
      GB
      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      Sep 26, 2021
      Too many wrong and inaccurate answers…
      Too many wrong and inaccurate answers for a sane person to deal with.
      If you want accurate info get as close to the horse’s mouth as you can, don’t really on the absolute nonsense uttered by clowns on the threads of Qora.

      Richie
      9 reviews
      GB
      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      May 16, 2021
      Absolutely fuming with this service
      Absolutely fuming with this service! My comments being deleted you don’t get no alert or reason! I’m not an active user but once I made a comment to a user who has 20,000 views per month you better believe your opinion right or wrong with no malice is being removed for nothing! stay clear of this service its fueled by greed and obviously money totally propaganda driven. what I’ve learnt after being on this service for 5 hours is that the users with up votes are the salesman the propaganda drivers I’ve had no reply from this terrible service why my opinions have been removed what a dirty scum company fueled by there own gain!!

      al man
      7 reviews
      US
      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      Sep 10, 2021
      q u or a is not only pretentious which…
      q u or a is not only pretentious which is fine. I mean if someone insults you are brags they are superior to you it’s okay

      However I now know q u o r a is dangerous. People encourage, motivate others to give up on life. ways to practice injury

      I believe q u o r a maybe doesn’t see these posts or the neurotic inventor Adam is more concerned with
      trans, LGBT than he is with

      people from India telling people they should give up on life.

      I would not use q u o r a unless it’s for stupid questions

      If you need help or feel isolated do not use q u o r a

      q u o r a i believe have a new kind of troll

      It’s not the troll looking for attention

      It’s a mentally insane cyber bully.

      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      Updated Sep 10, 2021
      q u o r a does not e posts of…
      I read posts where people reach out and say they want to give up on life

      without getting into detail I read many people some from different countries, cultures encouraging, motivating these people

      Q u o r a to me is for shock value and a melting pot of diverse shock and wow!

      It is to cause shock. It is liberally biased

      a website with dangerous people. If you like music

      and want to on a forum for guitar, etc

      or want to go on there you probably are okay.

      However google and q u o r a team up for

      cyber bullying, trolls to insult and ruin you by

      your tastes, experience and issues

      if you dislike say music, politics q u o r a

      bashes you.

      going back to the people who encourage, motivate others

      on giving up on life this is something q u o r a has

      they will ban you for using the term gay

      but when someone says they’re giving up on life

      a person can encourage, motivate and it doesn’t get banned

      the person who invented q u o r a Adam is

      mentally disturbed and he is behind the design of q u o r a.

      I do believe q u o r a is okay for communities like

      instruments but I would stay off there if you feel

      you are anxious, looking to get help

      because q u o r a has people who are looking

      to cause weak people into things like danger

      apathy and bashing.

      unless it’s on a topic like learning a guitar

      stay off q u o r a for any discussion because

      the people on here are anonymous and dangerous at best

      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      Updated Sep 3, 2021
      terrible website
      terrible website. in real life you probably not meet people who ask these type of questions
      the anonymous questions are only taking away age, name and gender.
      i feel q u or a wants diversity because their liberal biased wants confusion and to take something logical and simple and turn it into confusion so you can
      be like a dog chasing it’s tale

      they want you to be confused so you come back.

      i had a 1,000 people write about “broke” on here anonymous so they can basically be 17 in a nice house not working, going to school living off their parents while they ask about money and work.

      i really think you should stay off q u o r a because if you ever get upset with someone who knows if q u o r a wont get the law after you

      i find this website also has people who are not trained
      for example the people who write about music aren’t professors, teachers performers they are just

      people who want to bash anyone different.

      i dont go on q u o r a anymore especially after i posted something about music and someone told me i have anhedonia and shouldn’t talk about music

      he wasn’t a professor, a professional just some guy. honestly i do not like forums but q u or a is not reliable but just an opinion site and for experience not rational thought

      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      Aug 18, 2021
      q u o r a is filled with paranoid
      q u o r a is filled with paranoid, insane on edge people who obviously need a vacation or to get away from the opinions and gossip of every day life.

      These are people who are obviously bitter, morose and hate their jobs, lives and maybe hate themselves.

      no person on q u o r a is without an agenda. it’s like an office, every one is on pins and needles to make sense, give their opinion

      it’s uptight, paranoid and bitter.

      people on q u o r a are sad, bitter unhappy humans who rarely smile, show interest or amusement
      they are all snobs, brats elitists who are pseudo intellectuals
      hardly ever using examples, logical discussion
      only me me me I always liked that
      little adults in teenage bodies. just nasty, bitter
      bitter brats who obviously grew up
      too fast and now want to take out their bitterness
      on half the internet
      also q u o r a uses this stupid related questions
      so if I post something negative about music
      10 other questions pop up
      with more aged, bitter elitist annoying over priveleged
      entitled people.
      I would stay off q u o r a it is just noise without
      any person who really gives examples
      is trained in say music.
      musicians, music teachers would not waste there
      time talking to a wall for q u o t a to make q u o r a
      rich

      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      Aug 16, 2021
      q u o r a has the same kind of people…
      q u o r a has the same kind of people you see in a Woody Allen movie. Pseudo intellectuals who will only judge you by their own impossible standards

      also q u o r a has many people from different countries, different cultures giving opinions on American things. Do I really care what a man from India thinks of American music or finance? Does a man in India have any idea what American economy is?

      q u o r a also has many LGBT autism speaks so any question you see of autism, etc will have high biased from the autism community I even think the creator of q u o r a had some sort of Autism. Nothing wrong with autism but I do feel if you go to a post regarding autism you will get attacked by the autism speaks community

      q u o r a does not moderate or flag offensive questions
      poverty, religion etc is never flagged.

      they are more concerned if someone posts about autism, orientation like straight or LGBT.

      i also have read morbid even inhumane things on q u o r a

      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      Updated Aug 13, 2021
      I think q u o r a intentionally links…
      the two things you have to be careful about q o u r a is the related questions. Q u o r a I feel does this to get competition controversy and to lure in people

      If one person asks “how can someone not like music” 10 more posts will lure the person in creating elitism, even in a sense communism

      q u o r a I also feel is using things like autism speaks LGBT to get more people to get more data they really do not care but want data visitors to come on there and discuss controversial sensitive subjects.

      q u o r a to me is not a neutral website.

      i do not think you will gain any insight asking questions

      about music, etc because it’s too biased

      and people are like customers in a store. Who has money in their pocket

      is like the q u o r a reviewer. who has the biggest

      agenda to create controversy judgement

      and to just bamboozle and confuse.

      Massachusetts independent
      3 reviews
      US
      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      Feb 19, 2021
      If your not a flaming liberal you are…
      If your not a flaming liberal you are definitely going to be censored. Another site full off closed minded liberals who can’t tolerate anybody who dares think for themselves. You definitely have to be one of the mindless herd who thinks like they do.

      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      Updated Nov 7, 2020
      Very very censored
      Very very censored. anything that goes against the liberal herd mentality is censored.

      Sebastian Rostron
      2 reviews
      BE
      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      May 9, 2021
      I’ve never voluntarily signed up for…
      I’ve never voluntarily signed up for Quora, I have apparently had 2 accounts and had to delete them to clear space in my inbox. This is ridiculous and frankly I don’t want my data and information automatically linked and taken by a website.

      Varun Sharma
      11 reviews
      IN
      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      May 31, 2021
      Cunning American site ,
      It is just like another American websites ,these people can do everything for money , they highlight answers with wrong information , i think they take money to highlight a perticular review or answer . Whether , it is right or wrong .

      John Miller
      1 review
      US
      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      Nov 30, 2021
      Worst of the worst
      With no explanation, I was suddenly no longer able to answer any questions. I was silenced, because I tend to offer alternative opinions to the Narrative being shoved down our throats. Apparently things like questioning the origin of Covid, calling out the Left when it is lying, not denying chemtrails on a question asking what you think about it… no wonder everyone is saying they are fake and just ordinary contrails, because they literally ban everyone who doesn’t help form the appearance of consensus that fits the mainstream narrative. Apparently there is not a consensus or this shadow silencing would not be necessary. Shame on you Quora. Don’t trust anything you read there, it’s all carefully selected and not at all an open discussion.

      Richard Stuczynski
      1 review
      US
      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      Feb 14, 2022
      Awful
      Awful. When I asked why my post was deleted the moderator pointed to their policy and refused to tell me what I actually wrote that was disparaging. Blatant censorship.

      Celeste Newton
      2 reviews
      NZ
      Rated 2 out of 5 stars
      Updated Apr 17, 2021
      It’s difficult to use
      It is so annoying to use. Often when I click ‘read more’ it won’t let me and I have to try a few times and sometimes just give up. It’s not very responsive and I can’t comment because it didn’t like my username which I’ve since changed

      GERBEN
      2 reviews
      BR
      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      Feb 9, 2021
      Keeps on spamming
      Keeps on spamming, no matter how often you unsubscribe from emailing. Horrible company.

      Quora, if you send emails with an unsubscribe link below, then if people follow that link to unsubscribe from mailings you should comply with that.

      Ryan
      2 reviews
      GB
      Rated 2 out of 5 stars
      Updated Aug 8, 2021
      Quora is full of insincere stupid…
      Quora is full of insincere stupid questions (usually by Americans). Also full of covidiots and covid deniers (again usually Americans).

      Had great fun in conversing with a covidiot. He thinks covid is a “plandemic” and the virus was created to sell a cure. I said why would anyone create a virus that they could be infected with also? What a spanner 😂😂. He also thinks I bend to the Crown. I said lol you think I am in Buck Palace having my backside spanked by the Queen? 😂😂🤷‍♂️

      I posted a factual link to a question about is covid outbreak in the US getting worse and they deleted the answer.

      The other deleted answer was a link to a fact sheet in answer to is AIDS under control globally now.

      david stern
      2 reviews
      US
      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      Dec 7, 2021
      wretched morose bizzare website with…
      wretched morose bizzare website with anonymous questions written by people from fourth world country and 11. I read answers by a kid who was 12. He said people who had Anhedonia sat in silence. They were deaf. Very misinformed. Also the answers are okay
      but rarely provide any logical rational examples. I blame the mentally disturbed Adam D’Angelo who co-invented q u o r a to bash, judge, experiment on human nature

      q u o r a bashes the poor, the homeless, conservative, working class, sick, broke, in dept, but if you say the word GAY the far left q u o r a team will ban you

      use this site for poop talk not questions about friends, music you will just have anonymous 11 year olds and people from fourth world countries bash you

      for not liking what they like. extremely biased.

      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      Updated Dec 17, 2021
      i don’t know if people asking these…
      i don’t know if people asking these questions are stoned, hate people or just use the 13 year old restriction to post at the age of 14.

      the questions on here are just out of this world. they bash a poor person, someone in grief, someone deaf, mentally ill. all these Obamized teens on here are brainwashed…unlike kids of the past who liked vintage stuff these kids all bash you for disliking Drake and Britney. they are cyber brats stuck in 2008 because that’s when they were born.

      these people are monster, far left liberal brats who deserve to be hung and whacked

      this site is creating cyber zombie mongoloid criminals who belong in the lowest hell beyond hell maybe even worse than that.

      q u o r a is ruining learning by taking over google

      also if i type something to research, study i am being

      bashed, canceled stoned beaten by mongoloid cyber

      brats, whom like i said, are probably 14.

      Now Does Adam D’Angelo do anything no

      he would probably first need a therapist and to

      vent about how he got his ass kicked in middle

      school and had his far right Mormon parents turn him

      into a cold life less cyber god who created

      a website to destroy people.

      IanHaggis
      2 reviews
      AU
      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      Dec 25, 2021
      I deleted my account from that garbage…
      I deleted my account from that garbage website, They are a grade losers and morons. I see some very very sick people moderate that rubbish website. Bye Bye quora your days are over!

      PA
      Paul
      1 review
      US
      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      10 hours ago
      Dumpster fire
      Where do I start other than saying there are several issues and I would like to give Quora zero stars or even negative stars. I’d say the biggest issue is their moderation which I’ll start with.

      Inconsistent moderation and censorship
      Many reviewers have brought this up and claim only conservative comments are removed or censored. I believe it goes more of both ways as liberal or even non-political comments are also removed. I had a couple of my questions removed and warned that I would be banned if I continue to violate their terms. The first question was about moving to the USA to another country. I got several mean spirited responses such as calling me a liberal and that they wish I would leave or one even saying he wishes “liberals” would die. Two minutes later this question was deleted as a violation of Quora’s terms of service but the hateful responses I received that also seemed to be in violation didn’t get removed and would still be on the site if the question was still there. I didn’t get a chance to challenge the removal of my question. The second question I asked was about how a guy who is short can get women. Almost immediately, this question was deleted by moderators before anyone got a chance to answer this question. Meanwhile other questions and answers that appear to clearly violate their terms of service such as racist questions and questions that appear to be asked by Nazi sympathizers and denying the Holocaust were allowed and are still on Quora to this day even though they are hate speech. There also are a lot of US politics question that appear to be posted by Russian trolls to spread misinformation or stir up US citizens are allowed to be posted. You can even get a terms of service violation for responding to comments indicating they are wrong or inaccurate such as refuting claims that the Jewish Holocaust never happened.

      You must have a Quora account just to view an answer
      You cannot just view the answer on Quora, you must register for an account and for a while you were required to use your real name. It gets annoying to log in to Quora then finding out none of the answers answer your question and you wasted your time logging in.

      They force you to install their stinking app if you’re using a smart phone
      You cannot just point your web browser to Quora if you have a smart phone. You must download their app or find a way to trick Quora into thinking you’re not using a smart phone.

      Email SPAM
      Every time someone posts an answer to a question you asked, upvoted a comment you made, your answer received an x amount of views, and other notifications, you get an email. You also get emails on suggested questions to answer and user spaces to subscribe to. You can ask not to receive these notifications but you will still get them. Usually it will stop for a while but suddenly you get spammed again and have to request again not to receive so many notifications.

      Too much harassment from bigots and trolls
      Even though Quora has a policy against harassment and hate speech, nothing is stopping people from following you and posting harassing comments attacking you such as calling you a “liberal”. There are people on Quora who seemed to only join just to go after people they politically disagree with and post insults.

      Quora+ monetizing free user content
      They are trying to push their Quora+ paid content and taking answers that users posted intending to be free and placing them under their paywall. The user who posted the answer doesn’t get any of this money for their content that they originally posted under the impression that their content will be free to view and now require a paid membership to view.

      Anybody can edit your questions
      Anyone can edit your questions completely changing what the question asks or even adding racist insults to your question. This question is still attributed as being asked by you and a user would have to look at the edit log to see that the original question was edited and the racist comments weren’t made by you and wasn’t in the original question you asked. You can also merge the question with completely unrelated questions asking for different answers than what you’re asking.

      Red Fox
      2 reviews
      CA
      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      Updated 2 days ago
      The moderators target people that they ONLY think have no education and repeatedly delete ANY of their answers for NO REASON!
      I was with Quora for about two years and I answered many questions – the incoming ones in my email and even ones that I had found that were posted. I was consistent with lending good sound advice anyway possible, the answers I would give would be simple to read and straight to the point “the way an average person would speak” I use a vocabulary that reads easy so anyone can understand when reading them. I started to notice that there would be many others that when they posted their answers they were using big words and complex sentencing and were very technical. I never had a problem with this and I would never try to sound like a genius (like most of them) and for the most part everything was going great until recently, as almost every answer I would give was deleted and I even appealed and asked why? Then they sent me (the two) emails explaining why it was deleted and it explained how it was spam or how I was posting info about myself and also posting links that lead incoming traffic to various spam sites. NONE of what they said in those emails sent to me when I appealed why my answers were deleted did I ever put any of that (the above) within ANY of my answers. This only started recently and so far two of my answers got deleted in a weeks time, I never had this much of a problem before with the moderators but just today I had enough with it and it was the last straw. In my appeal (that I did today) I told them off and basically told them how bad of a job they are doing as moderators, not noticing anyone else’s spamming or how many links they would leave that induced incoming traffic to various websites and also requested for them to delete my account because its a HUGE waste of time to be apart of Quora when someone can’t even write any answer or speak there mind (how it really is) thru a answer given that somehow they find offensive and then it gets deleted within only a couple of hours, not even hate speeches nor anything to do with any politics did I ever post either only reply’s to simple everyday normal questions.

      I have a feeling they only begun to observe me (lately) and in the nature the way I write and use certain basic vocabulary then they were quick to judge that – this is a kid! Prob also from a ominous tip off from one of there favorited “spoiled” members most likely complained because they have no life much like everyone else that is on there as well.

      I also would like to point out that Im 43 so Im not a kid at all and far from it. The other thing I noticed with the other members on Quora is they have HUGE infatuation’s with people’s IQ levels and how high they are or they tend to brag about how high theirs is. Then there is one time I wrote a comment on someone else’s answer actually commending him and how I can relate to the situation and then he answers me with a sarcastic reply saying: Do you have a TLDR version of this wall of text? Like really??? So you have really ignorant people whom carry high end degrees in science and technology’s and so they have a good background of education (in their profiles just below the names) or so it says – but sometimes I wonder if there is much of a brain left? Then you see the ones whom think they are all it and smart but every logic yet fails them when someone answers them they get angry instead of choosing to carry an intelligent conversation like you would think they would have done originally like a real intelligent person would have.

      Most Quora members and its moderators all think alike and that is to say VERY unrealistic with linear thinking and terrible problematic solving, if something is not right to them then you are looked down on like a dummy and that is the REAL problem with being on Quora is if you are not using big words or not sounding the least bit smart (to them) enough they shun you out from there community all because of ignorance. I really hope that one day they can learn and be more better people rather then aggressive and quick to jump the gun and also stopping the favoritism with the members whom only think they are on a pedestal higher than the average person and I really hope they read this because its absolute ridiculous how they are running this site. An absolute waste of time to use Quora, I hope they fold and never come back!

      GinkgoTree
      3 reviews
      GB
      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      Apr 27, 2022
      Quora sucks
      Completely sickened by what I witnessed and experienced on Quora: the abject ignorance posing as erudition, unholy racism, vicious and uncalled for personal attacks. It’s very, very poorly monitored and perhaps only by bots programmed to a basic level. Some members are well-informed, kind, supportive but they’re in the minority. A site best avoided.

      Mike Bratescu
      12 reviews
      GB
      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      3 days ago
      Useless for normal people. Useful only for really dumb people.
      Every question must start with the words What, Where, When or Who. Otherwise it’s not acceptable. Any question that is more than 6 words is too much for Quora.
      Mmmeh..

      LouiseB
      4 reviews
      GB
      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      A day ago
      You can never seem to leave
      Terrible site. I’ve tried to leave so many times after I got hacked (it was actually more of a warning by hackers who encouraged me to change my passwords and use other security measures, not all hackers are scum and I’m normally pretty internet safe but it’s always changing) and the fact they really want you to get the app.

      I’ve actually asked my account to be deleted (not just deactivated although that seemed the only option one time). I accidentally signed up twice and tried to leave both. Well I finally thought I’d got rid years ago, the second time I tried to leave after I knew how hard it was I made sure (well thought I did) they couldn’t send me emails anymore by disabling all notifications (you have to go down a list, not an option to disable all of them at once).

      Then suddenly out of nowhere I started getting emails. Somehow I’d been signed back in by an account that should have been gone long ago and I found all my email notifications had been reselected. I had to go through it all over again and ask for my account to be deleted. I’m hoping I’ve finally got rid but I hoped that last time. Quora don’t make it easy and this company needs investigating. I’ve seen users defend them but they need to pay attention to these reviews.

      In principle it’s a good idea to have such a question and answer site but in reality it’s a mess.

      eric rayban
      1 review
      US
      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      2 days ago
      strongly liberally biased
      strongly liberally biased. I’ve used q u o r a for about 2 years now and gained nothing from it.
      It’s liberal, communist and socialist run
      you can’t say anything. You’ll get banned.
      Second the people ask horrible questions that will destroy any progress you make.
      it’s not for science, music, it’s merely pseudo intellectuals and people using a point to bash you and get data and quota.. Q u o r a is highly liberal, geared towards socialism and communism.

      q u o r a uses liberalism to gain power over military, average people who work hard and want to read without being called bigots, racist homophobic anti-semitic.

      if you aren’t LGBT or liberal you get bashed on q u o r a.

      Anything i say rational about music, religion gets bashed and i am treated horribly on here. I am bashed for my music taste my income. q u o r allows extreme bullying but takes of anything aimed at LGBT who Adam D’Angelo clearly advocates.

      q u o r a is a liberal jungle. For some reason anyone on here who posts anything nice or

      rational gets bullied. I have been tortured on here

      for two years now by liberals, socialists and biased

      i tell people i like music and they bully me with socialist

      communist opinions. I get really offended. But nothing happens

      Adam D’Angelo is a misinformed villian who should spend more time monitoring his website. He doesn’t realize that there’s racism, bullying torture on here.

      he allows bullying, racism, on his website. People torture and ruin others lives on here

      and no one cares. q u o r a is dangerous and no one

      gets banned. I am not here to judge. I am not a cop. People should be allowed to be weird and different

      and have the right to use online to do things. But

      q u or a is dangerous and biased. No one on here helps or advocates anything.

      it’s poorly run and now q u o r a is more globalized

      and mean and dangerous. People from India Israel will claim you’re racist. People from Israel are dangerous on here. But Adam and his team are more concerned with teenagers asking questions about the LGBT.

      and q u o r a doesn’t stop this. Also i get bashed for my income, my debt. But q u or a allows this.

      by people who are misinformed.

      Alex Mancini
      1 review
      US
      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      8 hours ago
      it’s very sad we have website likes q u…
      q u o r a reddit are all an overload of cancel culture

      mean dark evil pure evil indifferent people. I read people from India, Kenya who just bash people. also the trolls on here the cancel culture are on here to give you their opinion not any thing resourceful or even rational

      i don’t believe reddit or q u o r a have any purpose

      and mostly they’ll make you feel worse

      veterans homeless poor in debt sad grieving people should not use these websites

      and even worse social media is not for the weaken heart

      it is judgemental and bad.

      Florian Laur
      1 review
      DE
      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      2 hours ago
      Is it 1984 already?
      Unfortunately, Quora is one of the most intolerant apps/discussion forums I ever used.
      Originally, I just made a few posts about movies. But I got interested in the whole third wave feminism, sexism and other issues and unfortunately, that’s something you just can’t discuss on this platform.

      Anything that goes against the “right” (speak: left) opinion will be considered hate-speech!
      Examples of (in my opinion harmless) comments that got me banned:
      1. On a thread about Harvey Weinstein, I merely wrote “nobody is 100% evil or 100% good”.
      Hate-speech, ban.
      2. On a thread about curvy models, I said glorifying obesity is setting a dangerous example for children and it’s about health.
      That’s also hate-speech apparently.
      3. Some girl wrote that she can’t find any guy to love or to be with. I ASKED if maybe she has some insecurities and suggested some soul searching.
      Of course that’s also hate-speech.

      Meanwhile, there’s a whole thread about how “men are all murderers, rapists and basically to blame for everything bad on this planet and should be killed”. That’s fine as it seems, even though it lumps in a whole gender and is calling for violence (so the very basic definition of what constitutes hate-speech).

      I read that many people have this issue. All those SJW snowflakes prove that they can’t deal with adult forms of discussion and that they always have to make it personal. I reported someone who called me “incel”, since that should violate their rules as well, but of course he remained:).

      What bothers me is that you’re not even given any explanation. I really tried to hold back to avoid getting banned again, but it seems you can get banned for anything! I assume if you wrote “Indiana Jones fights Nazis in this movie”, they’ll ban you because you used the N word.

      I thought Facebook was bad recently in how easily they ban and block people, but Quora is far worse.

      It worries me how we live in a world where leftist fascists get to decide what’s right and wrong. How is that any better than fascism from the right was?

      Alex Mancini
      1 review
      US
      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      Updated 9 hours ago
      stay off this website
      stay off this website. Not that i am qualified to really tell anyone but it’s basically no more than a platform for LGBT and liberal communists.

      and old ladies to put naughty pictures up. Not that LGBT isn’t good but really shouldn’t a bot website be about questions not advocating org’s?

      also the questions are highly offensive inhumane and not appropriate for anyone. “What’s it feel like to be poor” who asks that? Questions that advocate mental abuse, disrespect of veterans, seniors, people who sadly go to jail. It’s very disrespectful to our country

      I am not saying q u o r a is totally bad. But it’s also very bad for you. Say you have a degree. you may encounter a lot of false information on q u o r a and unless you view the question log you may not know who’s behind the bad questions

      Jacqueline Wyman
      20 reviews
      HU
      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      6 hours ago
      Quora is a disgusting place
      Quora is a disgusting place.

      I saw my kid on skiming through quora and that’s when i saw all of the smut he was browsing through.

      It came as a genuine shocker when my 12 year old kid was browsing through pictures of abuse and mutilation on quora. a website that i thought was kid friendly was not kid friendly at all.

      Not to mention there are lot of weirdo on quora. People who are suggesting to other people to do all sorts of strange acts.

      Quora is also a really slow platform. Updates take a lot of time and there isn’t a clear way to see how your content is performing on quora.

      Also lots of fakes and people claiming to be the next stephen hawking and they are probably fake bots creating by russian disinformation campaigns.

      I wouldn’t use Quora, it’s not a place for intelligent people.

      Hannah Ettles
      2 reviews
      GB
      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      An hour ago
      This site is disgusting AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID!!!!!
      This site is the most disgusting site I’ve ever come across. If I could give it minus stars I bloody would. There are people who are chatting about raping children, how to rape them and how to abuse them without the children recognising it! It’s the most disgusting thing I’ve ever come across and no bloody child deserves to be abused. They do not give a crap about the children and Instead ban the people who are trying to report them. If you use this site you are contributing to this disgusting behaviour. Everyone who is involved with this are the most disgusting human beings on this planet! The people in control of quora are also bloody disgusting for allowing these disgusting practices. Sort out your god damn site!!!!!!!!

      don smith
      1 review
      US
      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      Updated 7 hours ago
      Mostly biased and liberal and…
      Mostly biased and liberal and offensive.

      also q u o r a doesn’t provide any examples, excuses or information. Most of the people aren’t musicians, professors, writers they are all

      misinformed uneducated poor men and women who can’t even tell me what music they like but then they bash you for not liking music. kind of random.

      most of the people lack knowledge and it’s like jail using q u o r a

      they’ll strip away your name, gender, value to get negative quota

      i encountered some scary people on q u o r a. No one really does much

      when you say Liberals are bad you get banned

      Obviously Adam D’Angelo needs some kind of counseling or help he’s deranged for making this website.

      Alex Mancini
      1 review
      US
      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      Updated 5 hours ago
      stay off this website
      stay off this website. Q u o r a has a large agenda for the LGBT and it’s very biased towards liberalism and even allows some controversial stuff. The people who answer the questions have no proof. They use large biased towards themselves and just take you down the rabbit hole of insanity.

      They will ask questions that the people in the mental hospital would ask basing it not off knowledge but their own mental disturbances.

      q u o r a allows basically anything offensive, dangerous and inaccurate.

      For example a teen may write “today in school my teacher told me the Holocaust was in the 1700’s. Is he wrong?”

      q u o r a will keep this answer up for spite. Even though they know it’s not fact based they keep it up

      But if you say liberal you get banned.

      Liam Baker
      1 review
      US
      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      2 hours ago
      Terrible website
      Terrible website. it allows porn and it’s hard to avoid seeing a porn pic spammed. The people that run this website seem to obviously not care about morals. Evil hateful comments seem not to be moderated at all. They seem to not delete any hateful atheists comments no matter how evil they are. Do not go on this website if you are a Christian or talk respectfully and decently. Also it is very weird to delete an account. If you accidentally sign in within 14 days of deletion they will cancel the deletion.

      don smith
      1 review
      US
      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      An hour ago
      gives you answers by guys from India
      gives you answers by guys from India, suicidal Jewish girls and Bi Sexual atheists.

      This is Adam D’Angelo’s goal. To create a Marxist, Liberal, Jewish, Indian, Atheist website

      where anyone who has an opinion gets bashed.

      basically anyone with a view on q u o r a gets bashed

      also the questions are half insane monotonous point less

      they bash the homeless, veterans, poor people, sick people drug addicts but if you say
      gay or insult Obama you get banned for two weeks

      stay of Reddit q u o r a and you tube.

      Ryan Fernandes Correia
      1 review
      BR
      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      Just now
      Bashing, Mindfucking, Gaslighting, Condescension, Low Quality Answers and Low Quality Questions…
      Bashing, Mindfucking, Gaslighting, Condescension, Low Quality Answers and Low Quality Questions… The best words to define what Quora is actually about, Quora is literally the worst website in the whole Internet, at least on surface and a website that actually Google puts it on the top 3 Google results. Quora looks like those very bad Facebook groups where you get very low quality comments about any topic, Quora is no different than that, Quora is literally the new Facebook at this point, it is not a website for have civilized discussion about anything, you cannot defend any point nor ask for anything without being bashed and getting very low quality answers filled with bashing, mindfucking, gaslighting, condescension… And still the Quora moderation makes it even worse, since you cannot question no one without having your comments removed and your account banned, Quora is not a website for looking for help for anything, it is just like trying to look for help in a Facebook group, same way for having good ideas and plans about anything, people will bash it, call it “pseudoscientific” and “bullsh1t” and still stole it, if you need help in something, look for a closed friend or for someone who can help in your your place or city, if you have any good idea about anything and you want to put it in practice, look for some local place where you can put your ideas in practice or even discuss it, because doing it on Quora is even worse than doing that on Facebook, and Google still make this even worse, Google loves to promote bashing, mindfucking, gaslighting and condescension as well. Avoid Quora, you’ll only get worse and you’ll even get really bad.

      Luis dos Santos
      1 review
      BR
      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      A minute ago
      Quora is a website made by atheist zealots for atheist zealots
      Quora is a website made by atheist zealots for atheist zealots, it is filled with very disturbing and shocking things said by atheist zealots in that website, as well as scientistic zealots, skeptical zealots, and rationalistic zealots as well. You cannot make any answer about religion/spirituality that you’ll get answers by atheist zealots that are often misinformation and even atheist fanatical propaganda. And Quora moderation often remove questions, answers and comments denouncing atheist zealots and even antiatheist things. This is a website to be avoided at best, if you are an antiatheist or a critic of atheism or you disagree with atheist zealots and atheist fanaticism I advice you to do not use Quora nor waste your time on Quora, because you’ll get shadow banned and you’ll get a lot of enemies, you will be bashed and you’ll even be hacked or cyberstalked, use your own blog if you want to post antiatheist things or even make your criticism of atheism than use Quora for do that. Those atheist zealots and those people who whitewash atheist fanaticism are only a bunch of clueless m*rons and just a bunch of w*nkers who believe their views/opinions are objective and they want to convert everyone to atheist fanaticism and scientistic fanaticism. It is very sad to see how atheist fanaticism and scientistic fanaticism are taking over the Internet and the world. I would be happier if we had more critics of atheism and critics of scientism/science. And still Google keep putting Quora answers on the top results, Google only cares about popularity, and Google is another website that promotes atheist fanaticism and scientistic fanaticism just as Quora. Quora is a place to be avoided at best, use another website, do not use Quora.

      Jeh Ruiz Ruiz
      3 reviews
      GB
      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      Updated Dec 29, 2021
      It’s not a safe site
      It’s not a safe site; much is sick beyond what you’d really want to know.

      Some members have fake credentials claiming to be doctors, psychiatrists when they’re actually patients with a personality disorder who can become very abusive.

      Then there are many hair-raisingly awful racist questions that Quora moderators do nothing about; I suspect some share the racist views that I’ve never seen expressed anywhere else. Very, very disturbing views too!

      And then the trolls, fetishists and fake questions. The questions asked by paedophiles about spanking children, or men asking about being spanked by their wives posing as sincere rather than sexually perverse questions.

      There are genuine questions and sincere answers. But it worries me there are also some very vulnerable people on the site looking for help and also children! Some do get support, but many others are either derided, bullied or just ignored.

      Frankly, overall Quora is a place best avoided unless you want to witness the very worst of humanity. It’s a toxic swamp where the sound, helpful, intelligent members are drowned out by poor moderating and some very ugly content.

      m jones
      20 reviews
      GB
      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      Updated Jan 4, 2022
      pointless
      Wow, another censorship full site from the land of the free. why bother? most of what i post is ignored. ok, i get answers soemtimes. but what i answer or reply to people has no reply, and that will be because its been deleted. im not that stupid i dont notice.
      because land of free dont like you to have opinions it dont agree with. usa fast becoming china. full of so called intellectuals who think because they have a piece of paper they are intelligent.

      Hannes K
      1 review
      AT
      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      Jan 3, 2022
      A horrible mix of untruths
      A horrible mix of untruths, half truths and content moderation from hell.
      They pay people to ask the dumbest questions, over and over again so Google keeps ranking them for “new content”.
      There is not a single bit of quality control, moderation is by people without education.
      The only actual use of Quora is for companies to spam their advertisements, hidden as “question” or “answer”.

      Jonathan
      9 reviews
      DK
      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      Jan 19, 2022
      Quora is a terrible website STAY AWAY!!!!!
      Quora is a terrible website. it feels like a joke. i have no idea why anyone would want to use it. I was scammed of 250 USD through a crypto pump and dump scheme on Telegraph. The scammer is encouraging people to join. I was so dumb to do so. I reported it, but Quora deleted my comment with no explanation. And if you appeal, it cannot be undone. Many users have left the platform because it’s a fraud and it consists of bots doing the deleting of comments. Won’t recommend this crappy, fraudulent site. And you cannot trust the comments there. Please BEWARE!

      Alan White
      2 reviews
      GB
      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      Dec 28, 2021
      Watch out for stalkers!
      Watch out for stalkers!

      Please don’t use your real name on Quora as people can google you and start stalking if they don’t agree with you! I’ve had to change my name a few times to get them off my trail. They literally googled my information, saw my Facebook and posted ridiculous things about me. It is blatant trolling and stalking.

      Quora did absolutely nothing even though I reported it hundreds of times and its been happening on and off for years. Reporting things gets you absolutely nowhere. They’ll allow stalking but delete your comment as soon as it doesn’t fit their cultural biases.

      Quora moderation is an absolute joke. You have people trolling left and right, making extremely rude comments, being confrontational and rude, but they’re allowed to stand. Post an innocent question and get banned straight away!!

      Quora is a site of low quality questions and low quality answers. Yes some of the information is useful but there is so much trolling and impolite behaviour on there that the whole thing is ruined.

      The misfits, morons and trolls of society are all on this place and you will get sucked in if you aren’t careful. So be very careful…it’s best to stay away. You will waste hours, weeks or months here thinking you’re making a valuable contribution when you aren’t..

      Suzanne Hundric
      6 reviews
      AU
      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      Jan 20, 2022
      It’s mostly a load of garbage
      It’s mostly a load of garbage. I’ve never posted on it or answered questions but when I’ve read questions & answers I see a lot of bashing & bullying to the questions posted. I often feel sorry for the person who wrote the question being attacked for something they wanted to seek helpful advice for. You’re always better off asking a professional doctor if medical related, professional councillor/Psycologist if mental health related, or a trusted family or friend member you can talk to. Never Quora unless you want to hear rubbish from abusers who put others down for their ego

      Daniel Mcintyre
      1 review
      AU
      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      Jan 20, 2022
      I had a very negative experience with Quora…
      I had a positive expectation of Quora but it was quickly quashed within a few visits.

      The moderation was beyond anything I have encountered on any social media site with questions often automatically censored for 14 days after which theyre automatically rejected without explanation or apparent reason.

      On one answer which I spent 45 minutes researching and writing I provided statistics published in the British Medical Journal and CDC press release which was quickly censored and then rejected.

      In another I was accused of hate speech by moderation against Chinese people because I said that my experience living with white people suggested that the fear of the culturally driven economic success of Chinese migrants was more of a factor than the fact that they were from China. It was a fear of being outworked.

      I appealed and they refused to reconsider.

      Its a site that simply is not worth investing time in unless one conforms to Qoura views imo.

      Robert Morrison
      1 review
      BR
      Rated 1 out of 5 stars
      A minute ago
      Quora is an atheist extremist website
      Quora is a completely atheist extremist website, it is filled with atheist extremist propaganda and scientistic extremist propaganda, without mention there are so many posts and answers openly defending atheist extremism, atheist fanaticism, scientistic extremism, scientistic fanaticism, misotheism, theospeciesism, deicidism, kratosism, antitheism and so on, and some answers are even very disturbing and even very harmful and shocking to so many people. And they say that Quora moderation deletes atheist things but they also do that with antiatheist things, and they say there are more “religious” people on Quora based on the number of “followings” on religious topics, but it means anything, it only proves their atheist fanaticism/extremism and how they will appeal to “statics” to justify their views, it is just like to say that USSR wasn’t a state atheist country because of the Orthodox majority or even that China is not state atheist because of the folk Chinese religious majority… And Quora moderators always censor antiatheist questions/answers/comments and they do not even allow antiatheists to have an argument with atheist zealots and atheist extremists. Quora is a shame and it is a website to be avoided at the best, except if you’re an atheist zealot or an atheist extremist or you enjoy reading shocking and disturbing content written by atheist zealots and atheist extremists.

      Mike Haynes
      1 review
      CA
      1 star: Bad
      Quora is the worst website on the Internet
      Quora is the worst website on the Internet when it is about “Q&A”, they do not allow non-mainstream narratives of the world, mainly non-leftist and non-atheist narratives as well as they simply shadow ban everyone who’s non-leftist and non-atheist and who disagree with their leftist “consensus” and atheist “consensus”, Quora allows leftists and atheists to say whatever they want against rightists and religion/spirituality and they ban everyone who answers to those attacks and question it. Don’t trust any atheist or leftist answers there, always question them and do not take them as “literal truths”, Quora will always help leftist extremists and atheist extremists to get their top answers and it will delete and ban everyone who disagrees with them, and mainly if you question the left about something or question atheists (atheist zealots) about something, you will be banned. Quora is the completely opposite of a Q&A website, it is a site for attack anything different and promote their “mainstream” narratives that are alt-leftism and atheist extremism, open discussion doesn’t exist on Quora, Quora is no different than those alt-leftist groups on Facebook and those atheist extremist groups on Facebook, and it is even worse because Google always put their results on the top. And most of the atheist extremists and alt-leftist extremists there will behave as if they were in atheist alt-leftist extremist groups on Facebook, they’ll harass you, bully you, humiliate you, gaslight you, mindfuck you, abuse ot terms like “pseudoscience”, “science denial”, “bullsh*t”, “antiscience”, “delusion”, “psychosis” and so on, as well as make you give up your beliefs and hypothesis/ideas and make you become an atheist/scientistic/materialist extremist, and if you deny that you will be banned, as well as if you answer them you’ll be banned, Quora is no different than those atheist alt-leftist extremist Facebook groups, Quora is the worst place if you disagree with alt-leftism and atheist extremism, do not use this site and as I told before, always question anything from this site that’s written by atheist extremists and alt-leftists, even create your own blog/channel/page for answer them outside of Quora because on Quora the chances of you getting banned doing that are 100%.

      Benjamin L. Nova
      1 review
      US
      1 star: Bad
      Quora is a very big scam
      Quora is a very big scam filled with atheist zealots, religious zealots, left-wing extremists, right-wing extremists, fascists, racists, anti-LGBTQI+, anti-OTMSN+, zionists, black supremacists, neopositivist extremists, scientistic zealots, PRC propagandists and so on, and the moderation of Quora always side with atheist zealots and left-wing extremists, despite sometimes they also side with fascists, anti-LGTQI+, anti-OTMSN+, racists, black supremacists and so on. I’ve been seen a lot of questions related to religion and spirituality and most answers or are answered by atheist zealots or by religious zealots and of course they do not help, same way for all political questions that are mostly answered by left-wing extremists and the others are answered by right-wing extremists, as well as the LGBTQI+ and OTMSN+ questions that are mostly answered by anti-LGBTQI+ and by anti-OTMSN+. Without mention the massive email spam quora does and the massive arbitrary moderation Quora does, one can call religion, spirituality, metaphysics, scientific/philosophical new ideas/hypothesis “pseudoscience”, “delusion”, bullsh*t” and such without getting moderated and if you answer them on the same level your comment is deleted and you’re banned. Quora is a very big scam website that exists, it’s not a Q&A website, but rather a site filled with extremists and zealots of all kinds and filled with insane people who think their views are objective and that they’re “rational” and “smart” but their views aren’t “objective” nor even they’re “rational” and “smart” under any coherent definition, and it’s also filled with pseudo-intellectuals who think they’re just like their ‘scientific popularizer” idols and call everything they disagree “pseudoscience”, “delusion”, “science denial”, “schizophrenia”, “bullsh*t” and such and without mention they highly standard levels for hypothesis and ideas and they’ll always attack any hypothesis and ideas that are there and even make someone with good ideas and hypothesis to give up of them! Quora is a scam, it’s not a place for debates nor healty discussions, but rather a place for promove extremist/fundamentalist ideas from religion to atheism and from left-wing to right-wing, and a place for make people addicted to it and even give up their ideas and plans for the future, without mention that most science questions are answered by scientistic zealots and neopositivists who see science by a scientificist perspective and only very few answers are from serious experts there and 99,99% of them are heavily attacked and the attackers aren’t banned, and that’s the why so many serious experts and people are leaving Quora because of that. Quora is a very big scam just like most of those “science popularizers” and “scientific” sites/blogs who are just neopositivist/neoatheist websites and channels, but Quora manages to be even worse than that by uniting all kinds of extremists/zealots that exist in one place and doing whatever they want, humiliating, harassing, bullying, stalking, scamming, gaslighting and mindfucking everyone they want without getting banned and if you say something you are banned. Do not use this scam, would rather get info by your local expert or join your local expert discussion group that you’ll get even more info than on Quora.

      Daniel Mattocks
      1 review
      US
      1 star: Bad
      Quora is Moderated by Far Left Atheist Zealots
      Quora is moderated by far left atheist zealots who always turn a blind eye on far leftists and on atheist zealots and delete/ban everyone who’s not far left and/or atheist zealot. Politically Quora is a far left website and religiously Quora is an atheist extremist website, as well as its users. They are far left atheist zealots who are ready to install state atheism worldwide as well as to install a far left liberal regime worldwide. The moderators are very arbitrary towards religious/spiritual people and non-liberals / non-leftists as well as they will delete and ban everyone who denies to become a far left atheist zealot or even criticize their far leftism and atheist fanaticism, besides most of the answers to your questions won’t help and they’ll all be answered or by far leftists (political and social ones) or by atheist zealots (religious, spiritual and philosophical ones). Rather use another website for make questions than use Quora.

      Ryan Taylor
      1 review
      1 star: Bad
      Quora is literaly PRC in form of a “Q&A” website
      If Quora was a country, it would be a far more totalitarian version of PRC, since there’s only atheist zealots and alt-leftists on this site and also a lot of people who talks about CCP and PRC and make propaganda for both of them. And any criticism towards atheism fanaticism, alt-leftism, CCP and PRC is simply removed and deleted, and you even get banned some cases. The whole “BNBR” of Quora is literally like if CCP decided to install a “BNBR” policy on PRC, the moderators of Quora are no different than CCP officials, as well as most of the users there are no different than CCP members, mainly the atheist zealots, alt-leftists, CCP/PRC propagandists, black supremacists, left-wing misogynists, left-wing sexists, left-wing fascists, left-wing neoliberals, dogmatic rationalists/positivists/materialists, identity politics supporters, dogmatic revisionists, anti-postmodernists, “anti-theists” (atheist extremists) and so on… The CCP of Quora always protect those members and will delete and ban anyone who opposes them and rejects their atheist-extremist and alt-leftist views/opinions who they believe that are “objective”. Quora is more for a PRC in form of a “Q&A” website than for a Q&A website for critical thinkers and unique thinkers.

      Micheal Fairchild
      1 review
      1 star: Bad
      Worst website share and think in new ideas/concepts
      If there’s a really bad website for share ideas and think in new ideas or concepts, it’s Quora, people will always put your ideas and concepts down and always try to make you to give up or your ideas and concepts, they’ll humiliate you, they’ll bully you, they’ll harass you, they’ll call your ideas “pseudoscientific” even they being just hypothesis or not well tested, they’ll call your ideas “delusional” if they aren’t materialist-compatible and they’ll do everything bad you could imagine without getting banned, and if you answers them on the same level they do, your replies will be deleted and your account will simply be banned! Quora is the worst website for share and think about new ideas and concepts, it’s filled with dogmatic scientificists, atheist zealots, hardline neopositivists, and people calling themselves “rationalists”/”rationals” but do not being “rationalist” under any coherent definition. If you have a new idea or concept if you think it’s good, would rather write an average to long post about that and post it in your blog or even contact your local expert in the area to see what they think about that and if it is worthy or not, and do not mention that Quora experts are more for insane people with fake graduation and/or atheist zealots and dogmatic scientificists with very insane, schizophrenic, dogmatic and passive-aggressive answers with words like “bullsh*t”, “pseudoscientific”, “delusional”, “illusion” and such, than a serious expert that will give you a good answers and even say if it’s a good idea/concept or if you should think more about that. Would rather talk with your local expert group or even in a site like Reddit or Facebook or even in a Youtube comment section than on this insane site named Quora.

      Martin Bolton
      1 review
      1 star: Bad
      Quora is unreliable for talking about science/technology
      Quora is the worst place for you talk or make questions about science/technology, you’ll get a lot of very poor answers made from people with fake graduations or even with no graduation or by logical posivists who think their views and beliefs are objective and absolute, besides you’ll probably get really hostile answers about your scientific/technological questions, do not even think or plan to discuss about hypothetical scientific/technological concepts and ideas on Quora, you’ll get really disappointed and they’ll do their best to “invalidate” your hypothesis/ideas and put it as being “pseudoscientific” or “bullsh*t”, despite most of them will nor even read a single theory of what you wrote and will say what they think and calling names on it. Rather use a Facebook group or even a Subreddit for talking about science and technology than Quora, despite most of their answers will have no source and will be completely unreliable, despite the atheist zealots answering questions related to religion and spirituality that makes Quora an even more unreliable place for discussing about everything, besides the orwellian moderators who will remove any criticism/questioning you make to science/technology or even to the answers of the people there and even ban you while the person who called names on you or who attack you and/or your idea will suffer nothing, and without mention the people there who even say that criticism of science is equal to science denial and antiscience and will call everything as science denial and antiscience as well. Using Quora for talking about science/technology is even worse than using Youtube for talking about science/technology, since on Youtube you need to have some reliability, and on Quora not.

      James Powe
      1 review
      1 star: Bad
      Quora is an atheist extremist website…
      Quora is an atheist extremist website filled with atheist extremists and left-wing neoliberals who can say whatever they want, harass everyone they want, bully everyone they want without getting banned while if you answer or question them you will be banned. All political answers are answered by left-wing neoliberals as well as all religious/spiritual answers are answered by atheist extremists. It’s a really bad site if you have hypothesis and ideas about abstract and hypothetical things, they will always try to put you down and make you to give up of your ideas and hypothesis and even calling it “pseudoscientific” all the time, despite they will call any criticism of science as “science denial” and “antiscience”! They’re very insane people, and they call religious/spiritual people “delusional”, “insane”, “schizophrenic”, “irrational”… being the atheist zealots on Quora are exactly like that as well as their insane answers, they call themselves “rational”, “rationalists” and such terms but they aren’t, they are just atheist extremists and logical positivists to the extreme. Quora is not a site for talking about science, technology, religion, spirituality, esoterics, metaphysica, life, existence… Do not use Quora if you respect yourself and love yourself, use your local discussion group/chat for make questions or even a deep Google/DuckDuckGo search than use Quora. And the worst thing is that if you question or criticize the their atheist extremism (including militant atheism and new atheism) your comments will be removed and your account will be banned! The moderation of Quora are left-wing atheist extremists as well as most of its members.

Leave a Reply