Why does anything exist?


Why does anything exist? Why is there something rather than nothing? Wouldn’t nothing have been so much easier?

This question has awed and mystified people throughout time.

The first question which we have a right to ask will be, “Why is there something rather than nothing?”

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz in “The Principles of Nature and Grace, Based on Reason” (1714)

Not how the world is, is the mystical, but that it is.

Ludwig Wittgenstein in “Treatise on Logic and Philosophy” (1921)

No question is more sublime than why there is a Universe: why there is something rather than nothing.

Derek Parfit in “Why Anything? Why This?” (2008)

Martin Heidegger called this question the “fundamental question of metaphysics.” But it might as well be the fundamental question for any being — our existence poses a mystery that demands an answer.

Something, rather than nothing. Where does it all come from? Why is there anything at all?
Something, rather than nothing. Where does it all come from? Why is there anything at all?

Every society in every time has wrestled with this dilemma. It’s our most enduring question. For we all seek to know: why we are here?

Lacking an answer, we are like a ship adrift. Our ignorance on this question makes us like an amnesiac who awakens in a dark and strange place — knowing neither where we are, nor how we got here.

Some say without an answer to this question, we can’t know anything:

It is possible to think that one cannot answer any question if one cannot answer the question of why there is something rather than nothing. How can we know why something is (or should be) a certain way if we don’t know why there is anything at all? Surely this is the first philosophical question that has to be answered.

Robert Nozick in “Philosophical Explanations” (1981)

With an answer to this question we could orientate ourselves. We would know our place in reality, and understand the reason behind it all. An answer to this question would tell us not only why we exist, but also what else exists, both within the universe we see and beyond.

But can this question even be answered?

Some have suggested the answer is unknowable.

Who knows truly? Who here will declare whence it arose, whence this creation? The gods are subsequent to the creation of this. Who, then, knows whence it has come into being? Whence this creation has come into being; whether it was made or not; he in the highest heaven is its surveyor. Surely he knows, or perhaps he knows not.

The Hymn of Creation in “Rig Veda” (c. 1500 B.C.)

For most of history, the question remained beyond the possibility of being answered. But we live in a most-exciting point in time: one where this question has fallen to the progress of human knowledge.

In the past decades, results from physics, cosmology, mathematics, and computer science, have coordinated at last to solve this timeless question. We can now say, with some confidence, why we exist.

The answer we have is more than an idle philosophical speculation — it can be observationally tested and thereby be confirmed or falsified.

So far, observations are in agreement with this answer.

Let us retrace humanity’s steps in finding this answer, and see what this answer reveals about the nature of reality and our place in it.

Contents

Two Paths to Existence

One reason we find “Why does anything exist?” so difficult is that there are only two possible answers — both are repugnant to our intuition as each contradicts our commonsense understanding of the world.

Given something exists, either:

  1. Something emerged from nothing, or
  2. There are self-existent things
Did something come from nothing, or are there self-existent things?
Did something come from nothing, or are there self-existent things?

The idea that something came out of nothing is contrary to reason. How can nothingness do, nevermind create, anything?

The idea that there exist self-existent things, is contrary to experience. Everything we know appears to have a preceding cause. How could anything create itself, or exist without some creative act?

And yet, that one of these answers must be right seems inescapable. There’s no other way to reach “something exists” without either starting with something at the beginning, or starting with nothing and having something emerge from nothing.

If we seek an answer to this question we have to be willing to accept an idea contrary to our commonsense understanding of the world.

But which of these paths leads to the correct answer?

Something from Nothing?

The first of the two answers is that something emerged from nothing. But how is this possible? Does it even make sense logically?

For at least 2,500 years, humans have debated whether anything can come from nothing. The Greek philosopher Parmenides made the earliest recorded argument that “nothing comes from nothing.”

I will not permit thee to say or to think that [being] came from not-being; for it is impossible to think or to say that not-being is. What would then have stirred it into activity that [being] should arise from not-being later rather than earlier? So it is necessary that being either is absolutely or is not.

Parmenides in “The Way of the Truth” (c. 475 B.C.)

To decide whether existence emerging from nothingness is even logically possible, we need a precise definition of nothing. For instance, by ‘nothing’ do we mean no things, or do we mean absolute nothingness: no laws, structures, properties, or principles?

Defining Nothing

It might have been true that nothing ever existed: no living beings, no stars, no atoms, not even space or time. When we think about this possibility it can seem astonishing that anything exists.

Derek Parfit in “Why Anything? Why This?” (2008)

What is nothing? It seems like a straightforward question. Just keep removing things until there is nothing left.

Start with the universe as it is. Wipe away all the matter and energy. Take away all the quantum fields of the vacuum, and any virtual particles popping in and out of existence. And voilà: nothingness.

Nothingness: reality after we delete every thing out of existence.

But wait, there’s still space. It still has dimensionality, and curvature. There is still time and physical law, even if there are no particles or fields left to be governed by them. Let us delete those too.

Let’s erase the volume of space, erase time, and erase physical law.

When we say out of nothingness we do not mean out of the vacuum of physics. The vacuum of physics is loaded with geometrical structure and vacuum fluctuations and virtual pairs of particles. The Universe is already in existence when we have such a vacuum.

No, when we speak of nothingness we mean nothingness: neither structure, nor law, nor plan.

John Archibald Wheeler in “Law Without Law” (1983)

What are we left with? If we eliminate all the dimensions of space and time, we’re left with a zero-dimensional, changeless point.

But a point is still a thing. Can we delete that too?

Kinds of Nothing

So long as we operate from a theory of geometry, we can’t define nothingness as anything less than a space of zero-dimensionality.

This leaves us with a point.

If we want to eliminate the point, we need to define nothingness not as a space of zero dimensionality, but as something non-geometric. For this, we must define nothingness in terms of some other theory.

But any theory we might choose has its own notion of nothing. In other words, nothingness is theory-dependent.

TheoryNotion of Nothing
PhysicsNo energy: the vacuum
GeometryNo dimensionality: a point
Set theoryNo elements: the empty set
ArithmeticNo magnitude: zero
Information theoryNo information: zero bits

There is an unlimited number of possible theoretical systems. Does this mean there are also unlimited conceptions of nothing?

Nothing is simple. Not even Nothing.

Bruno Marchal

Might there be a true nothing — one with no laws, principles, nor any theory behind it? Or might every conception of nothing require a theory of things in order to declare that there are none of them?

Rules for Nothing

Wheeler called for absolute nothingness: “neither structure, nor law, nor plan.” But is this kind of absolute nothing achievable?

For instance, the law of identity holds that for any A, “A = A“. Without such a rule, there would be nothing to ensure that nothing stayed nothing, and didn’t later become equal to something.

For nothingness to persist, the rules of logic must apply. Further, if nothingness is the state where “zero things exist”, then the rules of arithmetic must also hold to ensure that “0 = 0” rather than “0 = 1”.

For there to remain no things requires some minimum set of laws. There might be no things as such, but the idea of no laws seems incompatible with there being and remaining no things.

In the beginning, there was only truth, logic and their relation. No possible reality can do without them.

C. W. Rietdijk in “Four-dimensional reality continued” (2018)

If there were no logic, what logic or reason ensures that nothing comes from nothing? If there were no laws, what law or principle would prohibit the spontaneous emergence of a universe?

The Trouble with Nothing

Can we define nothing in a way that suppresses all forms of existence?

That is, to not only have no things, but an absolute nothingness — a nothingness of no objects, neither abstract nor concrete, no properties, no laws, no principles, and no information content?

Or is this a fool’s errand? One that leads to a logical inconsistency and thus an impossibility? Might nothingness be, in some sense, unstable?

Perhaps nothingness, by its own nature, is am untenable situation. Image Credit: Wikimedia
Perhaps nothingness, by its own nature, is untenable. Image Credit: Wikimedia

If absolute nothingness can be shown to be an impossible dream, it will advance us on our path to discover the reason for existence. It might even reveal some self-existent or necessarily-existent thing.

Properties of Nothing

Any time we delete something from reality, we leave something else in its place. When we deleted matter, we created a vacuum. When we eliminated light, we created darkness. When we removed heat we created cold. When we deleted space, we created a point.

The idea of nothingness has not one jot more meaning than a square circle. The absence of one thing always being the presence of another — which we prefer to leave aside because it is not the thing that interests us or the thing we were expecting — suppression is never anything more than substitution, a two-sided operation which we agree to look at from one side only: so that the idea of the absolution of everything is self-destructive, inconceivable; it is a pseudo-idea, a mirage conjured by our own imagination.

Henri Bergson in “The Two Sources of Morality and Religion” (1935)

If every deletion is a substitution for something else, then a pure nothing, devoid of any properties whatever, is impossible.

Whac-A-Mole CHAMP!!!
Eliminating every thing and property from reality might be like a game of Whac-A-Mole — where each time we remove one property or thing, another pops up in its place.

So while we might succeed in removing all material things from reality, we could not remove all properties from reality.

The existence of properties appears inescapable.

Nothingness, of any kind will always have some description and properties, even when it’s just a cold, dark, empty, vacuum.

But how far can we go in eliminating properties?

For instance, if we define nothingness as the empty set from set theory, what properties would remain? Temperature has no meaning for a set.

Would any properties remain for such a nothing?

Properties of Zero

Every conception and definition of nothing contains at its heart: zero. For any conception of a thing, nothing will always be zero of them.

The vacuum: zero energy. Geometry: zero dimensionality. The empty set: zero elements. Arithmetic: zero magnitude. Information theory: zero bits.

If zero is a universal property of nothing, we must ask: what are the properties of zero? What does zero bring to the table of reality?

Zero has many properties. It’s even, it’s the additive identity, it’s the only number that’s neither positive nor negative. It’s the number of elements in the empty set and the number of even primes greater than two.

In fact, zero has more properties than we could list if we recruited all the atoms in the observable universe to serve as paper and ink. This effort is doomed because zero’s properties are infinite in number.

The universe is a very big place – these are galaxies billions of light years away.
A small patch of the observable universe. There are more properties of zero than there are atoms within all the galaxies visible in this picture (around 7.74 \times 10^{72} atoms.)

Zero’s factors couldn’t be listed, as zero has infinitely many of them. Every number evenly divides zero and hence is one of zero’s factors.

Aside from zero’s factors, we could list infinite trivial properties of zero: zero is “the difference between 1 and 1” and it’s “the difference between 2 and 2” and it’s “the difference between 3 and 3” and so on.

But there are also an infinite number of non-trivial properties of zero. Some are even beyond the understanding of today’s mathematicians. As an example, mathematicians have for centuries wondered:

are there even numbers >2 that aren’t the sum of two primes?

This question is known as Goldbach’s conjecture after Christian Goldbach who posed it in 1742. Nearly three centuries later, it remains unsolved.

Between 2000 and 2002, a $1,000,000 prize was offered to anyone who could answer this question. All this money to settle a question about a property of zero. To decide: is zero the number of exceptions to Goldbach’s rule?

We now see why “Nothing is simple. Not even nothing.” All definitions of nothing include the concept of zero. Far from being simple, zero is an object of unlimited complexity.

An Explosion of Entities

Can zero exist in isolation — completely alone from other numbers? Or do relationships between numbers make them inseparable?

Zero’s properties reference other numbers. And each of these numbers carries its own set of properties and relations to the other numbers.

Are the properties of one any less real than the properties of zero? Perhaps in a reality having no things, ‘one’ is meaningless.

In a reality containing nothing, there are no things as such — at least no material things. But in such a nothing, there is an abstract thing: zero.

Zero reflects the number of material things to count. But how many abstract things are there to count? There is at least one. The one number that exists to define the number of material things is zero.

But if we have one number and it is one thing to count, now another number exists: one. We then have zero and one together as the only numbers. But now we have two numbers. Now two exists…

This is how numbers are defined in set theory. Within set theory, each number is formed as the set of all previous sets. The process starts with the empty set (represented by { } or ∅) which contains zero things.

  • 0 = { } = ∅
  • 1 = { 0 } = {∅}
  • 2 = { 0, 1 } = { ∅, {∅} }
  • 3 = { 0, 1, 2 } = { ∅, {∅} , {∅, {∅}} }
  • 4 = { 0, 1, 2, 3 } = { ∅, {∅}, {∅, {∅}}, {∅, {∅}, {∅, {∅}}} }

It seems once a single abstract number is admitted, each next number comes to life as the count of the abstract numbers that preceded it. Is there any way to stop the proliferation of infinite abstract entities?

Once the number zero exists, the rest follow.
Once the abstract entity zero exists, do all the other numbers inevitably follow?

If zero exists by virtue of there being zero things to count, then on that basis, shouldn’t every number have the same right to exist by virtue of being the number of preceding numbers there are to count?

The existence of any number, in virtue of its properties, entails the existence of all the others i.e. a system of mathematics couldn’t exist bereft only of the number, say, 42; and the existence of any number, in virtue of the full set of its properties/structural relationships, entails the existence of every other number.

David Pearce in “Why Does Anything Exist?” (1995)

Set theory and building up numbers from the empty set are modern ideas — they appeared around the turn of the 20th century. Yet the idea of numbers giving rise to themselves goes back much farther.

The Tao gives birth to One.
One gives birth to Two.
Two gives birth to Three.
Three gives birth to all things.

Laozi in chapter 42 of “Tao Te Ching” (c. 600 B.C.)

A True Nothing

Whenever we specify or define nothing, we invoke theories and concepts which, in turn, lead to properties and abstract entities.

But what if we forgo even specifying nothing? Might this be a path to achieve absolute nothingness? A true nothing, having:

  • No things, no objects
  • No definitions, no properties
  • No abstract entities, no concepts
  • No sets, no numbers
  • No set theory, no mathematics
  • No specifications, No information

Avoiding all this we have no theories of any kind. We are left with a plain and simple, pure, unadulterated nothing at all.

But again this leads to trouble. There’s a problem with this kind of nothing — a nothing of no information is identical to everything.

We note that the collection of all possible descriptions has zero complexity, or information content. This is a consequence of algorithmic information theory, the fundamental theory of computer science. There is a mathematical equivalence between the Everything, as represented by this collection of all possible descriptions and Nothing, a state of no information.

Russell Standish in “Theory of Nothing” (2006)

At first this sounds counter-intuitive, if not outright wrong. Yet this consequence is something we intuitively understand in other contexts.

Let’s review three such cases: Unsculpted Marble, an Unsent E-mail, and the Library of Babel. Each demonstrates an equivalence between the nothing of no specification, and the everything of all possibilities.

Unsculpted Marble

Before marked by a sculptor’s chisel, a block of marble contains every figure — or at least every figure fitting the dimensions of the block.

On the left: blocks of Marble from a quarry in Carrara. On the right: Michelangelo’s Pietà

Michelangelo’s Pietà was in the block before he uncovered it. It was there with all the other figures. To bring forth the Pietà alone, required the addition of information. Michelangelo had to uniquely specify the Pietà from among the set of all possibilities.

There is a beautiful angel in that block of marble, and I am going to find it? All I have to do is to knock off the outside pieces of marble, and be very careful not to cut into the angel with my chisel. In a month or so you will see how beautiful it is.

George F. Pentecost in “The Angel in the Marble” (1883)

This specification requires adding information to the block, by way of chisel marks. It is only in the absence of this information — in the absence of any chisel marks — that all possible figures remain.

In this sense, information is subtractive rather than additive. When information specifies, it eliminates from the preexisting infinite set of possibilities. Absent such information, all possibilities remain.

An Unsent E-mail

You are at your desk, awaiting an important e-mail from your boss.

Before this message arrives you know nothing about the contents of this e-mail — you are in a state of having no information.

But there is one thing you know before the e-mail arrives: the e-mail will be one message from among the infinite set of possible e-mails.

Only after the e-mail arrives in your inbox do you learn which from among the infinite set of messages the boss chose to send you.

But consider the case where instead of sending a single e-mail, the boss sent you every possible e-mail. Would you be able to learn anything from these infinite messages about what your boss wants?

The lack of specification in the infinite set of messages is equal to the lack of specification that existed prior to receiving anything. Both states are equivalently unspecified. Therefore, both represent states of complete ignorance and a state of having zero information.

Having every message is as informative as having no message.

The Library of Babel

One of the best illustrations of the uselessness of all information comes from Jorge Luis Borges’s concept of a ‘Total Library’, described in his short story The Library of Babel.

This library is described as follows:

The universe (which others call the Library) is composed of an indefinite and perhaps infinite number of hexagonal galleries, with vast air shafts between, surrounded by very low railings. From any of the hexagons one can see, interminably, the upper and lower floors. […]

There are five shelves for each of the hexagon’s walls; each shelf contains thirty-five books of uniform format; each book is of four hundred and ten pages; each page, of forty lines, each line, of some eighty letters which are black in color. […]

This thinker observed that all the books, no matter how diverse they might be, are made up of the same elements: the space, the period, the comma, the twenty-two letters of the alphabet. He also alleged a fact which travelers have confirmed: In the vast Library there are no two identical books. From these two incontrovertible premises he deduced that the Library is total and that its shelves register all the possible combinations of the twenty-odd orthographical symbols.

Jorge Luis Borges in “The Library of Babel” (1941)

From the provided information, we can calculate the number of books in this library. This total library contains every possible 410-page book, representing every possible arrangement of 25 characters.

Each page, with 40 lines and 80 characters, contains 3,200 characters. Each book, with 410 pages, contains 410 \times \text{3,200} = \text{1,312,000} characters. With an alphabet of 25 characters, this gives 25^{\text{1,312,000}} possible books.

This number is 25 multiplied by itself over a million times. To put its magnitude in context, the number of atoms in the observable universe is only 25^{57} or 25 multiplied by itself 57 times.

The Library of Babel, containing every 410-page book, seems to go on forever.
Image Source: The Long Room pf The Old Library at Trinity College
The Library of Babel, containing every 410-page book, seems to go on forever.
Image Source: The Long Room in The Old Library at Trinity College

This library is a great treasure. For in this library we can find every book, article, poem, and novel ever written, or that could be written.

We’ll find descriptions of every scientific theory: from Newton’s Principia, to Einstein’s Relativity, to the presently unknown theory of quantum gravity. We’ll find blueprints to world-changing technologies not yet invented based on principles not yet discovered.

This library possesses the greatest works of literature: the complete works of Shakespeare, Dickens, and Tolstoy. It also has every work yet to be written: the completed Game of Thrones series, as well as the unfinished works of Tolkien, Hemingway, and Twain.

The library has the untold histories of every civilization, including civilizations now lost to time. It has the contents of every scroll burned in the fire of Alexandria. The library has biographies of every person who’s ever lived — and even biographies of those yet to be born.

What could be more valuable than this boundless trove of information, with its complete knowledge, its answers to every mystery, and its articulated solutions to every problem?

This is where the equivalence between all information and no information rears its ugly head. It renders the library worthless.

There are issues with this library. To start, for every valid theory, technology, history, and biography in the library, there are countless others that are subtly wrong, inaccurate, or utterly bogus.

Worse, finding any book with more than a few grammatically sensible words is next to impossible. Most books are pure gibberish (or babble) — indistinguishable from random sequences of characters.

A typical page from a book in the Library of Babel is pure gibberish. Here, English-sounding words are highlighted, but are no more frequent than random chance predicts.
A typical page from a book in the Library of Babel. Here, English-sounding words are highlighted, but these are no more frequent than random chance predicts.

Perhaps all hope is not lost. Since this library contains every possible book, surely this library contains books that serve as indexes to find all the other meaningful and sensible books in the library.

But this dream is also impossible.

Given the number of books, it’s impossible to uniquely reference any other book with a descriptor shorter than the length of the book. Thus it takes all 410 pages to reference a specific book in this library.

Due to its completeness, the library itself is the most compact catalog of all the books in the library. In other words, a card-catalog of the library would be the library itself.
Due to its completeness, the library itself is the most compact catalog of all the books in the library. In other words, a card-catalog of the library would be the library itself.

What if we organize the books somehow, such as by sorting them in alphabetical order? Then finding any particular book would be easy.

This too suffers from a pathological breakdown.

While this makes it easy to find any particular book, the difficulty shifts from finding the book to deciding which book we want to find.

This is a consequence of the library having every possible book. As one seeks a book of interest, one is faced with 25 choices: to choose which of the 25 characters is next in the content of the book we seek.

During the search, the seeker must choose each next letter, and must do this for all 1,312,000 characters in the book. Thus, finding a book in this library is as difficult as writing the book in the first place!

In a way, we already have access to this library — as we are already free to put down any sequence of characters we want, and thus “find” a book that is already present somewhere in this total library.

Thus, this library provides no new knowledge or information. Its set of all books is as helpful to us as if it had no books. And so a total library offers nothing. It’s equivalent to having no information at all.

You can explore this frustrating enigma of the Library of Babel. Jonathan Basile created an online version at libraryofbabel.info.

Everything From Nothing?

Information theory reveals the equivalence between the totality of all information and the nothingness of zero information. Both lack any specification. Both are completely uninformative. Both contain within them the complete and infinite set of every possibility.

We’ve seen this equivalence first-hand. We saw it in the unsculpted block of marble, in the unsent e-mail, and in the Library of Babel.

So is a nothing of no specification, a nothing or an everything?

Less Information, More Reality

How much information is in the Library of Babel?

To determine this, we need only consider what is the shortest description that can generate the content of the library.

For instance:

A library containing one of each possible 410-page book with 3,200 characters per page and a fixed alphabet of 25 characters.

The preceding description for the library is 125 characters long. There could be shorter descriptions, but this sets an upper-bound for the information content of the Library of Babel.

It takes next to no information to describe the vast Library of Babel. Paradoxically, there’s more information in a single page from a single book in the Library, than in the entire library itself!

How could this be? How can there be less information in the library as a whole than there is in a single book or page from the library?

This is a consequence of algorithmic information theory, which includes the science of data compression. It reveals that it is simpler (in terms of needing a shorter description) to generate every book in the library than it is to generate only a single book, or a single page of a book in the library.

A shorter, less specific, and more general description casts a wider net:

Thing SpecifiedRequired Information
A single book1,312,000 characters
The Library of Babel125 characters
“All possible books”18 characters

The description “All possible books” needs fewer characters than the description of the Library of Babel, but it defines a much larger set of books, in fact, it defines an infinite set of books, of all possible lengths and character sets. The Library of Babel, though vast, was still finite.

Might the same apply to our universe and reality?

To describe one universe like ours requires a vast amount of information. It requires specifying not only the physical laws, but also the position, direction, and speed of every particle in the universe.

This is estimated to require on the order of 10^{90} bits.

Yet to specify every possible universe of our kind — a multiverse of every possible arrangement of particles ruled by our laws of physics — needs much less information.

Such a multiverse requires only the information to define the physical laws, particle types, fundamental forces and constants of nature.

This can be done in just a few pages of equations.

The great equations of physics which define the rules of our universe fit on a few pages.
Image Credit: Max Tegmark

Describing our specific universe is like describing a specific book from the Library of Babel. It needs more information than the library itself.

In theories such as the string theory landscape, the constants of nature are not specified by the theory, leading to an even greater multiverse consisting of every possible universe having every set of possible values for the constants of nature (e.g. different values for things like the electron mass and the strength of electromagnetism).

There are reasons to suspect this, or something like it is true. For one, it explains why laws of physics and constants of nature appear fine-tuned for the emergence of life. (See: “Was the universe made for life?“)

This description of a “string theory landscape” needs less information. It might save a page by not having to include the 30 some odd constants of nature. And yet, it describes a vastly larger multiverse.

Thing SpecifiedRequired Information
Observable Universe
Particle velocities
Physical constants
Physical equations
10^{90} bits
~10^{85} pages
Quantum Multiverse
Physical constants
Physical equations
\approx \text{144,000} bits
~6 pages
String Theory Landscape
Physical equations
\approx \text{120,000} bits
~5 pages
All physical possibility?0 bits

What happens when the length of reality’s description goes to zero?

This would leave the equations themselves unspecified — implying an even greater multiverse. This multiverse includes universes not just of every arrangement of matter, nor universes of every set of constants, but universes ruled by every kind of physical equations.

If all possible string vacua, space-time geometries, masses of elementary particles and interaction strengths, and (by)laws of physics are realized, then all possible descriptions are satisfied. This is equivalent to zero information.

David Pearce in “Why Does Anything Exist?” (1995)

Thus, to specify all possible physical laws, all possible physical constants, for all possible universes, needs no information at all.

Might we inhabit such a nothing?

This is the thesis of Russell Standish’s 2006 book Theory of Nothing.

Standish believes our universe, with its seemingly vast quantity of information, is something like a book in the Library of Babel. We would then be denizens of nothing, occupying a place within a total reality which altogether amounts to zero information.

Such a reality — one of zero information — is the simplest state of existence. It’s simpler than an empty vacuum or a geometrical point, as these both need a non-zero amount of information to describe.

Necessary Existence

We’ve attempted but frustratingly failed to define a true nothing.

When we tried to specify a nothing, whether as a vacuum, a point, or an empty set, we inevitably invoke properties, abstract entities, the number zero and the infinitude of numbers and their relationships.

Furthermore, this specification is not an absolute nothing as it requires reality to have a nonzero amount of information to specify it.

Alternatively, if we attempt a nothing of zero information and zero specification we get a total reality containing all possibility. Neither approach succeeds in bringing about absolute nothingness.

Moreover, these approaches rely upon and assume the validity of logical principles and consistency. No reality, not even a nothing, appears possible without laws and principles of logic.

And so the goal of the philosopher’s nothing, the “neither structure, nor law, nor plan” kind of true nothing at all, seems an impossible dream.

The nothings we attempt break down and lead to somethings.

  • With no structure, there are zero structures, this introduces zero and with it the structure of all numbers and their interrelations.
  • With no law, there are no restrictions on what can or cannot exist nor any law to prevent things spontaneously popping into existence.
  • With no plan, there is no information, which is equivalent to a totality.
Inspired by his discovery of binary numbers, Leibniz wrote to the Duke of Brunswick in 1679 suggesting a design for a coin. He titled it “Imago Creationis” (The Image of Creation).

The motto reads:

“Omnibus ex nihil ducendis sufficit unum”
For producing everything out of nothing, one principal is enough.

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz in “letter to Duke” (1679)

If a true and absolute nothing is impossible or unstable, does this mean there must be self-creating or self-existent things? Can a thing exist out of logical necessity, because its absence is impossible?

What might the nature of such things be?

A Self-Existent Thing?

If something did not emerge out of nothing, then there’s only one other possibility: that there is something that has always existed.

In other words, nothingness is not the default state of reality.

It is extraordinary that there should exist anything at all. Surely the most natural state of affairs is simply nothing: no universe, no God, nothing. But there is something.

Richard Swinburne in “Is There a God?” (1996)

Given that something exists, it either came from nothing or else something has existed from the beginning. The existence of this thing is somehow necessary. It existed without any preceding cause.

This, we also find contrary to intuition. It’s strange because everything we are familiar with can trace its existence to some earlier cause:

Manufactured things are made by people, or by machines that were made by people. Life comes from other life. Things not created by humans or other life, like rivers and mountains are created by natural forces acting on matter. It seems to defy reason for a thing to exist without a cause. And yet, we know the universe exists.

The universe either came from some preceding cause, or else the universe has always existed, is self-existent, or self-creating.

There is no third option. If the universe is not the end of this causal chain, then something else is. Therefore we must accept some things are self-creating (come out of nothing) or are self-existent.

Let’s call such a thing causeless.

Existing without Cause

Take anything that exists: the chair you’re sitting in, your conscious thoughts, the Eiffel tower. For the purposes of the reasoning, it doesn’t matter what thing we start with.

Given that this thing exists, there are two possibilities: either that thing was caused or it was not caused. If a thing has no cause, then it is causeless. Otherwise, the thing has a cause and its existence is owed to some other thing. If we follow the chain of causality back towards an ultimate root cause, there are three possibilities:

  1. First Cause: The chain of causality comes to an end in a ‘first cause
  2. Infinite Regression: The chain of causality continues forever
  3. Causal Loop: The chain of causality forms a closed cycle, or a loop

These represent all possibilities. The trace either ends (a first cause) or it continues forever. If it continues forever it forms an infinite chain that’s either open (an infinite regression) or closed (a causal loop).

In all three cases we find something that has always existed: either the first cause, the infinite chain itself, or the causal loop itself. This thing, which has always existed, we can describe as causeless.

First Cause

If when tracing back through the series of causes we happen upon something causeless, then our existence results from a first cause.

According to some models, the Big Bang may represent a first cause.

Leading cosmological theories, such as the big bang and cosmic inflation posit that the universe is not infinitely old, but rather underwent an abrupt event where it came into existence.

That our universe has a point that may be marked as a beginning leaves open the possibility that there is a preceding cause for our universe. Another possibility is that the universe is its own cause, emerging as a random quantum fluctuation allowed by laws of physics.

 Michelangelo’sThe Creation of Adam” (1512)

Many religions speak of the first cause as a divine act of creation. In such a case God would be the first cause. Yet some other non-theistic object could as well be responsible for our existence.

If the universe is not eternal, we should look for some reason for the sudden appearance of the universe: to explain how it could arise by itself, be self-existent, or be the product of some prior cause.

Infinite Regression

If our universe has an eternal history, or if it belongs to a reality having an eternal history, then we exist due to an infinite regression.

Before the Big Bang 7: An Eternal Cyclic Universe, CCC revisited & Twistor Theory
According to conformal cyclic cosmology, the big bang is one among an infinite succession.

A number of scientific theories propose that our universe is eternal.

Prior to wide acceptance of the big bang, the steady-state model was popular. It proposed that the universe is eternally expanding with new matter perpetually created to fill the void in the newly made space.

Since the acceptance of the big bang, various new models suppose that the big bang is itself part of an eternal succession of big bangs.

Roger Penrose’s conformal cyclic cosmology supposes that the heat death of our universe could appear as a new big bang in the next ‘aeon’.

Lee Smolin proposed cosmological natural selection wherein a new universe spawns every time a black hole forms. Accordingly, if the laws mutate, he suggests that universes might even ‘evolve’ towards having laws that maximize the production of black holes.

Sean Carroll notes that the equations of quantum mechanics, unlike those of general relativity, permit physicists to calculate eternally into the past or future. With a theory of quantum gravity, we could in principle predict backwards to times preceding the big bang.

The Schrödinger equation has an immediate, profound consequence: almost all quantum states evolve eternally toward both the past and the future. Unlike classical models such as spacetime in general relativity, which can hit singularities beyond which evolution cannot be extended, quantum evolution is very simple. […] If this setup describes the real world, there is no beginning nor end to time.

Sean Carroll in “Why Is There Something, Rather Than Nothing?” (2018)
According to ancient legends, the world rests on the back of a Cosmic Turtle. When asked what the Cosmic Turtle rests on, a common response is, “It is turtles all the way down” — an infinite regression.

If an infinite regression is true, there is no ultimate cause. However, we might still look for an ultimate explanation for the chain of causes.

Causal Loop

It might be that our existence is part of an infinite series, but one that repeats forever. If true, we are stuck in a never ending causal loop.

The hypothesized Big Bounce is an example of a cyclic cosmology.

In 1922, Alexander Friedmann applied Einstein’s equations of general relativity to the universe as a whole. He found that for certain values of the density of the universe and the cosmological constant, the universe will expand for a period of time, slow down, and eventually recollapse.

In his 1923 book, The World as Space and Time, Friedmann speculates that the collapse (or Big Crunch) could rebound (in a Big Bounce), causing a new Big Bang. The process could repeat forever.

The idea of a cyclic cosmology has appealed to many scientists, including Georges Lemaître, Richard Tolman, George Gamow, William Bonnor, Herman Zanstra and Robert Dicke, among others.

We can now ask ourselves two important questions: why was our universe in such a highly compressed state, and why did it start expanding? The simplest and mathematically most consistent, way of answering these questions would be to say that the Big Squeeze which took place in the early history of our universe was the result of a collapse which took place at a still earlier era, and that the present expansion is simply an “elastic” rebound which started as soon as the maximum permissible squeezing density was reached.

George Gamow in “The Creation of the Universe” (1952)

Cyclical cosmologies can be found in many religions. For example, there is the concept of the Wheel of Time in the Dharmic religions.

The Nataraja depicts cycles of creation and destruction. Image Credit: Wikipedia

The most elegant and sublime of these is a representation of the creation of the universe at the beginning of each cosmic cycle, a motif known as the cosmic dance of Shiva.

The god, called in this manifestation Nataraja, the Dance King, has four hands. In the upper right hand is a drum whose sound is the sound of creation. In the upper left hand is a tongue of flame, a reminder that the universe, now newly created, will billions of years from now be utterly destroyed.

Carl Sagan in “Cosmos” (1980)

But cyclic models, lacking observational evidence and theoretical support, remained on the periphery of cosmology.

In 1998, observations revealed the expansion of the universe was not slowing, but accelerating. This seems to rule out a future collapse.

The driver of this acceleration, dark energy, remains little understood. If it is constant, the expansion will continue forever. But in some theories, it varies with time and so a later collapse may be possible.

Cyclic models have seen a revival. In 2001, Justin Khoury, Burt Ovrut, Paul Steinhard and Neil Turok proposed the ekpyrotic universe.

This idea marries string theory and cosmology to give a model where periodic brane collisions trigger cycles of Big Bangs and Big Crunches.

If our universe is part of a causal loop, no beginning or end is identifiable. But what got it started? Did one of the succession of states spring forth out of nothing, or might the loop have always existed?

The Nature of Uncaused Things

Given that reality exists, we know there must be an entity that is causeless. What is it about causeless entities that makes them existent?

If a first cause, how did it bring itself into existence? If an infinite regression or causal loop, how did it come into being?

Might it exist out of logical necessity? Or is it a result of chance? Or might it exist simply because it can exist, and nothing forbids it?

Tracing causes backwards can tell us where the previous state came from, but it won’t answer where the chain or loop itself came from.

Some believe that, if all events were caused by earlier events, everything would be explained. That, however, is not so. Even an infinite series of events cannot explain itself. We could ask why this series occurred, rather than some other series, or no series.

Derek Parfit in “Why Anything? Why This?” (2008)

What we are looking for is not a cause, but a reason — an explanation.

For in the cases of the loops or infinite regression, we can always find an earlier cause, but may never reach a satisfactory reason.

For the question to be properly, fully answered, we need a sufficient reason that has no need of any further reason—a ‘Because’ that doesn’t throw up a further ‘Why?’—and this must lie outside the series of contingent things, and must be found in a substance which is the cause of the entire series. It must be something that exists necessarily, carrying the reason for its existence within itself; only that can give us a sufficient reason at which we can stop, having no further Why?-question taking us from this being to something else.

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz in “The Principles of Nature and Grace, Based on Reason” (1714)

If we seek a final ‘Because’ that puts an end to any further ‘Whys’, we must find something that we can show must exist. Not only must this thing exist, but we must also show how this thing can account for the reality we experience — only then will we have succeeded in our quest.

Candidates for Self-Existence

Throughout history, philosophers, scientists and religions have suggested candidates for self-existence.

These causeless entities generally fall into one of seven categories:

  1. Logic
  2. Truth
  3. Numbers
  4. Possibility
  5. The Universe
  6. A Higher Plane
  7. Consciousness

Let’s review each candidate and its merits for self-existence. Afterwards, we will consider whether that entity could further serve as an ultimate explanation: a self-existent starting point from which the rest of reality emerges as a direct consequence of that thing.

Logic

Is logic self-existent? Can logic explain why does anything exist?

Some suppose rational principles, like the laws of logic, are self-existent. Unlike physical laws, logical laws have an air of inevitability to them.

These are laws such as:

These are laws that seem inevitable, and necessary in any reality, as it’s hard to imagine any reality where logical laws would not hold.

If logical laws apply in all universes and all possible realities, they represent universal laws, applying everywhere and to everything.

If we can say laws of physics exist because all matter in our universe adheres to physical laws, then could we say laws of logic exist, because all things in all possible realities adhere to these logical laws?

If so, then laws of logic are self-existent. They are necessary even in a reality of no things, as logical laws ensure “nothing = nothing”.

If I ask myself why bodies or minds exist rather than nothing, I find no answer; but that a logical principle, such as A = A, should have the power of creating itself, triumphing over the nought throughout eternity, seems to be natural.

Henri Bergson in “Creative Evolution” (1907)

This idea, that logical law and rational principles have eternally existed predates modern philosophers. It’s a cornerstone belief in Taoism.

There was something formless and perfect before the universe was born. It is serene. Empty. Solitary. Unchanging. Infinite. Eternally present. It is the mother of the universe.

For lack of a better name, I call it the Tao.

Laozi in chapter 25 of “Tao Te Ching” (c. 600 B.C.)

Tao translates as “the way”, “principles”, and “natural order”. A similar sentiment is expressed in Christianity. The Gospel of John begins:

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Gospel of Johnchapter 1 verse 1 (100 A.D.)

The term Word is a translation of verbum in Latin, which is a translation of logos (λόγος) in Greek. Logos has a deep and rich meaning. Aside from “word” logos also means, “reason”, “principles”, and “rational law”.

Logos is the root from which we get the word logic. It is also the origin of the suffix -logy (as in biology, geology and psychology). Where it means the principles, explanation, and story thereof.

If however he be admitted to exist apart from Matter in virtue of his character as a principle and a rational law [logos], God will be bodiless, the Creative Power bodiless.

Plotinus in “The Enneads VI.1.26” (270 A.D.)

In Chinese bibles, Logos has been translated as Tao. In this way, Both Taoist and Christian ideas suppose that the Tao/Logos (order, reason, principles, logic, rational law) exists prior to the material universe.

Truth

Is truth self-existent? Can truth explain why does anything exist?

Some believe that truth is causeless.

There seems to be some essential difference between “zero is even” and “zero is odd” — only one of them is true. Did anything make it so?

When did this statement become true? Did it require a human mind to conceive of it as being true, or has it always been true? Might this property of truth have an independent and necessary existence?

If logical laws apply universally, then any well-formed statement is either true or false. The law of noncontradiction says a statement can’t be both true and false. The law of excluded middle says a statement must be either true or false — there is no middle ground.

Thus, if logical laws apply to everything, they apply to all statements, forcing on them the objective property of being either ‘true’ or ‘false’. As Derek Parfit said, “Some truth is logically necessary when its denial leads to a contradiction.”

Accordingly, the truth that “zero is even” would exist before humans proved it. It would be true before it was first spoken. Presumably, it would be true absent a universe of things, for even in the case zero things exist, it remains true that “an even number of things exist.”

When we imagine how things would have been if nothing had ever existed, what we should imagine away are such things as living beings, stars and atoms. There would still have been various truths, such as the truth that there were no stars or atoms, or that 9 is divisible by 3. We can ask why these things would have been true. And such questions may have answers. Thus we can explain why, even if nothing had ever existed, 9 would still have been divisible by 3. There is no conceivable alternative.

Derek Parfit in “Why Anything? Why This?” (2008)

Ultimately, nothing is responsible for creating this truth. Truth exists out of its own necessity. It has always existed and could never not exist.

The idea of the primacy of truth is very old. It can be found in many religions, some of which draw an equivalence between God and Truth.

In the 3,000 year old religion of Zoroastrianism, it is said that Asha (meaning truth and order) is the divine law behind all things.

Iran, as India, presents us with a term which has had to signify first of all ‘true statement’; that this statement, because it was true, had to correspond to an objective, material reality; and that, as the discourse did, this reality must embrace all things; and, finally that one recognized in it a great cosmic principle since all things happen according to it.

Jacques Duchesne-Guillemin in “Heraclitus and Iran” (1963)

In the book of Psalms 31:5, God is called the “God of truth.” In the Qur’an, Al-Ḥaqq (meaning The Truth), is one of the 99 Names of God.

Similar ideas are found in Dharmic religions.

The Mūl Mantar (or root mantra), is the most important verse of the Sikh religion. It begins: “There is one creator, whose name is truth” and is described as timeless, beyond birth or death, and self-existent.

In the Brahma Saṁhitā, a Hindu prayer book, the primeval Lord Govinda is described as the “indivisible, infinite, limitless, truth.”

If it is possible for the human tongue to give the fullest description of God, I have come to the conclusion that God is Truth.

Mahatma Gandhi in “All Men Are Brothers” (1953)

Numbers

Are numbers self-existent? Can numbers explain why does anything exist?

Some speculate that numbers, or their relationships, are self-existent.

If truth has an independent existence, this truth includes the infinite truths describing all true relationships between the numbers.

These include arithmetical statements, such as:

  • 2 is even
  • 7 is prime
  • 1 is greater than 0
  • 2 + 2 = 4
  • n × 0 = 0
  • the square root of 9 = 3

Truths concerning the numbers are boundless.

Might this infinite truth, provide a scaffolding and structure to all the numbers? And if there is nothing more to numbers than their properties and relations, then might numbers — in some sense — really exist?

It’s been said, “math is the science we could still do if we woke up tomorrow and there was no universe.” The idea that math holds some claim to reality is known as mathematical realism, or Platonism. It’s believed by many, if not most, mathematicians.

It is an idea that many mathematicians are comfortable with. In this scheme, the truths that mathematicians seek are, in a clear sense, already “there”, and mathematical research can be compared with archaeology; the mathematicians’ job is to seek out these truths as a task of discovery rather than one of invention.

Roger Penrose in “The Big Questions: What is reality?” (2006)

But can number relations have any reality in the absence of things?

If zero things exist, it would have to be true that “0 not equal 1”, and also that “0 not equal 2”, and true that zero not equal any other number.

So even with no things, an infinite number of arithmetical relations are needed to avoid contradiction and preserve a nothing of zero things.

If all things were absent, would Two And Two Make Four be a non-reality, remaining like that until at least four things had come to exist? Presumably the answer must be No.

John A. Leslie and Robert Lawrence Kuhn in “The Mystery of Existence” (2013)

This idea that numbers have an independent existence is ancient. It can be traced to some of the earliest records of human thought. It was taught by ancient philosophers and is found in the oldest religious texts.

Taoism, for instance, sets the existence of numbers as prior to things.

The Tao gives birth to One.
One gives birth to Two.
Two gives birth to Three.
Three gives birth to all things.

Laozi in chapter 42 of “Tao Te Ching” (c. 600 B.C.)

The Greek mathematician Pythagoras taught “All things are number.

Pythagoreans applied themselves to mathematics, and were the first to develop this science; and through studying it they came to believe that its principles are the principles of everything.

Aristotle in “Metaphysics 1.985b” (c. 350 BC)

Pythagoras was the first to propose that the motions of the planets are governed by mathematical equations, which he called the harmony of the spheres. When Newton discovered his law of universal gravitation some 2,000 years later, he credited Pythagoras for the discovery.

Across times, mathematicians have described a seemingly divine connection between mathematics and reality:

Geometry, which before the origin of things was coeternal with the divine mind and is God himself (for what could there be in God which would not be God himself?), supplied God with patterns for the creation of the world, and passed over to Man along with the image of God.

Johannes Kepler in “The Harmony of the World” (1619)

From these considerations it is now wonderfully evident how a certain divine mathematics or metaphysical mechanics is employed in the very origination of things.

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz in “On the Ultimate Origination of Things” (1697)

To all of us who hold the Christian belief that God is truth, anything that is true is a fact about God, and mathematics is a branch of theology. […]

An old Greek, a French child, and a self-taught Indian, each finds for himself the same theory of geometrical conics. The simplest and therefore the most scientific way of describing this, is that they have discovered, not created, a geometry that exists by itself eternally, the same for all, the same for teacher as for taught, the same for man as for God. The truth that is the same for man as for God is pure mathematics.

Hilda P. Hudson in “Mathematics and Eternity” (1925)

Possibility

Are possible objects self-existent? Can possible objects explain why does anything exist?

Some speculate that simply not being impossible, is sufficient for being actual. If true, then every possible object, structure, and entity exists.

What then is impossible?

At a minimum, we can say self-contradictory things. For example: square circles, married bachelors, triangles with five sides, and so on. We might also include things proven to not exist: odd numbers evenly divisible by two, a largest prime number, a sixth platonic solid.

If consistency and provability are the requirements for possibility, then possible existence is mathematical existence. As David Hilbert said, “Mathematical existence is merely freedom from contradiction.”

The idea that all possible things exist has enjoyed many names:

In 1936, Arthur Lovejoy dubbed it the principle of plenitude. In 1981, Robert Nozick named it the principle of fecundity. David Lewis, in 1986, developed it as a theory he called modal realism. In Max Tegmark’s 1998 model of multiverses, he called it the mathematical universe hypothesis. Most recently, in 2008, Derek Parfit coined the all worlds hypothesis.

If all possible objects are actual, then our universe is just one such possible structure among an infinite, and total, set of all possible structures. Anything that could happen, happens somewhere.

There are so many other worlds, in fact, that absolutely every way that a world could possibly be is a way that some world is. And as with worlds, so it is with parts of worlds. There are ever so many ways that a part of a world could be; and so many and so varied are the other worlds that absolutely every way that a part of a world could possibly be is a way that some part of some world is.

David Lewis in “On the Plurality of Worlds” (1986)

If the universe is inherently mathematical, then why was only one of the many mathematical structures singled out to describe a universe? A fundamental asymmetry appears to be built into the heart of reality.

As a way out of this conundrum, I have suggested that complete mathematical symmetry holds: that all mathematical structures exist physically as well. Every mathematical structure corresponds to a parallel universe.

Max Tegmark in “Parallel Universes” (2003)

The idea that possibility is sufficient for actuality is not new.

Arthur Lovejoy, who wrote about the history of this idea, traced it to 360 B.C. beginning with Plato’s theory of forms. Plato hypothesized a realm containing all possible forms (eternal, perfect, idealizations).

We find this idea expressed in a variety of ways throughout history.

The One is all things and not a single one of them. […] It is because there is nothing in it that all things come from it: in order that being may exist, the One is not being, but the generator of being.

Plotinus in “The Enneads V.2.1” (270 A.D.)

But to explain more distinctly how from eternal or essential metaphysical truths there arise temporal, contingent or physical truths, we must first observe that, from the very fact that there exists something rather than nothing, it follows that in possible things, or in possibility or essence itself, there is a certain need of existence, or so to speak, a claim to exist, in a word, that essence of itself tends to existence.

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz in “On the Ultimate Origination of Things” (1697)

Others have linked God’s infinite nature to an infinite creation.

From God’s supreme power, or infinite nature, an infinite number of things—that is, all things have necessarily flowed forth in an infinite number of ways, or always flow from the same necessity; in the same way as from the nature of a triangle it follows from eternity and for eternity, that its three interior angles are equal to two right angles.

Baruch Spinoza in “Ethics” (1677)

Know thou of a truth that the worlds of God are countless in their number, and infinite in their range. None can reckon or comprehend them except God, the All-Knowing, the All-Wise.

Baháʼu’lláh in “Tablet to Vafá” (circa 1885)

It makes sense that an infinitely creative deity would create other universes, not just our own. […] For the theist, the existence of multiple universes would simply support the view that creation reflects the infinite creativity of the creator.

Robin A. Collins in “Spiritual Information” (2005)

The Universe

Is the universe self-existent? Can we explain why the universe exists?

Some say that the universe, or the physical law that enabled it to come into existence, has always existed and so is self-existent.

The reasoning is simple. If we know at least one thing is causeless, why not just presume this causeless thing is the universe itself?

I should say that the universe is just there, and that’s all.

Bertrand Russell in “Russell-Copleston debate” (1948)

Perhaps there is no reason. It simply is, and has no explanation.

Given the universe exists, we know the universe is possible. Perhaps it exists because it is possible, and nothing forbade it from existing.

But there are other tracks to follow. Perhaps we can demonstrate that the universe is self-creating. Or that it exists due to some higher law.

Modern cosmology made progress along these directions.

The theory of cosmic inflation uses general relativity to explain how a tiny quantum fluctuation can inflate into the huge universe we now see.

Inflation is radically at odds with the old dictum of Democritus and Lucretius, “Nothing can be created from nothing.” If inflation is right, everything can be created from nothing, or at least from very little. If inflation is right, the universe can properly be called the ultimate free lunch.

Alan Guth in “Inflation and the New Era of High-Precision Cosmology” (2002)

According to the laws of quantum mechanics, the quantum fluctuation that seeded our universe appeared because it was possible, emerging out of nothing but the physical laws themselves.

Is there any bound to how small the initial universe could be? […] To my surprise, I found that the tunneling probability did not vanish as the initial size approached zero. I also noticed that my calculations were greatly simplified when I allowed the initial radius of the universe to vanish. This was really crazy: what I had was a mathematical description of a universe tunneling from a zero size — from nothing! […]

And yet, the state of “nothing” cannot be identified with absolute nothingness. The tunneling is described by the laws of quantum mechanics, and thus “nothing” should be subjected to these laws. The laws of physics must have existed, even though there was no universe.

Alexander Vilenkin in “Many Worlds in One” (2006)

General relativity and quantum mechanics are the two cornerstone theories of modern physics. From them alone we can explain a self-emerging universe. Quantum mechanics shows how possible fluctuations spontaneously pop into existence. General relativity explains how such a fluctuation could expand exponentially to reach an unfathomable size. (See: “What caused the big bang?”)

But we must wonder, why these laws? What, if anything, is special about them? Who or what anointed these equations with existence?

What is it that breathes fire into the equations and makes a universe for them to describe? The usual approach of science of constructing a mathematical model cannot answer the questions of why there should be a universe for the model to describe. Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?

Stephen Hawking in “A Brief History of Time” (1988)

The idea that the universe is uncreated, or exists due to some laws, predates the successes of modern physics and cosmology.

The ancient Greeks and Romans believed that the material of the universe has always existed, since nothing comes from nothing.

The first principle is that nothing can be created from the non-existent: for otherwise anything would be formed from anything without the need of seed.

Epicurus in “Letter to Herodotus” (c. 300 B.C.)

This matter was originally in a state of disorder (or kháos).

Before the ocean and the earth appeared — before the skies had overspread them all — the face of Nature in a vast expanse was naught but Chaos uniformly waste.

Ovid in “Metamorphoses” (8 A.D.)

It was not until a divine craftsman imposed mathematical order on this chaos that the ordered universe — the kosmos — appeared.

In religions with past-eternal cosmologies, the universe is believed to be causeless. Jainism explicitly says the universe was not created.

The doctrine that the world was created is ill advised and should be rejected. If God created the world, where was he before the creation? If you say he was transcendent then and needed no support, where is he now? How could God have made this world without any raw material? If you say that he made this first, and then the world, you are faced with an endless regression. If you declare that this raw material arose naturally you fall into another fallacy, For the whole universe might thus have been its own creator, and have arisen quite naturally.

Jinasena in “Mahapurana” (898 A.D.)

A Higher Plane

Is a higher plane self-existent? Can a higher plane explain why anything exists?

Some suppose our universe exists on account of a higher plane and that this higher plane, rather than the universe, is self-existent.

There are many conceptions of what this higher plane of reality is.

Some describe this plane as a cause of being, be it God, a creator, divine will, a first cause, or an unmoved mover. Others describe it as a source of being, the Mind of God, The One, or the Tao. Still others describe it as a ground of being, The Absolute, The All, or what Hindus call Brahman.

Not all theories of higher planes of existence need be supernatural. There are also naturalistic descriptions of higher realities.

In multiverse theories, a higher reality contains our universe among others. In brane cosmology, our universe is caused by collisions in a literal ‘higher dimension’. In the simulation hypothesis, our universe is the result of computations occurring in a more fundamental reality. (See: “Are we living in a computer simulation?”)

Though these theories deal with phenomena that are beyond the nature of our universe, and hence supernatural, evidence is accumulating for some of these higher realms.

Every experiment that brings better credence to inflationary theory brings us much closer to hints that the multiverse is real.

Andrei Linde in interview (2014)

Various theories imply that various types of parallel universes exist, so that by modus ponens, if we take any of these theories seriously, we’re forced to take seriously also some parallel universes. […] Parallel universes aren’t a theory, but predictions of certain theories.

Max Tegmark in “Are Parallel Universes Unscientific Nonsense?” (2014)

The idea of a preexistent cause, source, or ground of being, one that’s external to and beyond our universe, is as old as religion itself.

By means of the Higher Knowledge the wise behold everywhere Brahman, which otherwise cannot be seen or seized, which has no root or attributes, no eyes or ears, no hands or feet; which is eternal and omnipresent, all-pervading and extremely subtle; which is imperishable and the source of all beings.

Mundaka Upanishad I.6 (c. 800 B.C.)

In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.

Genesis 1:1 (c. 600 B.C.)

Consciousness

Is consciousness self-existent? Can consciousness explain why does anything exist?

Some posit that consciousness is self-existent. If true, consciousness could be the cause of a universe that exists only in appearance.

The idea seems strange, but we must admit all knowledge of existence comes to us through experiences that exist in our conscious minds.

This fact hasn’t escaped the attention of scientists.

It is difficult for the matter-of-fact physicist to accept the view that the substratum of everything is of mental character. But no one can deny that mind is the first and most direct thing in our experience, and all else is remote inference.

Arthur Eddington in “The Nature of the Physical World” (1927)

I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness. We cannot get behind consciousness. Everything that we talk about, everything that we regard as existing, postulates consciousness.

Max Planck in “Interviews with Great Scientists” (1931)

The relation between mind and matter perplexes scientists to this day.

It leads to philosophical conundrums like brains in a vat, Boltzmann brains, and the simulation argument. All of which suppose that perceived reality is an illusion — a byproduct of a deluded mind.

It’s also led physicists to propose theories where conscious minds play a fundamental role in shaping reality as we see it. Physics, after all, is fundamentally about experiences. Physics is the science of predicting future observations from prior observations.

In 1970, Heinz-Dieter Zeh proposed the many-minds interpretation of quantum mechanics, which proposes that differentiation of an infinity of observer mind states explains quantum phenomena.

A many minds theory, like a many worlds theory, supposes that, associated with a sentient being at any given time, there is a multiplicity of distinct conscious points of view. But a many minds theory holds that it is these conscious points of view or ‘minds,’ rather than ‘worlds’, that are to be conceived as literally dividing or differentiating over time.

Michael Lockwood in “‘Many Minds’. Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics” (1995)

The mysterious link between consciousness and reality inspired John Wheeler’s idea of a participatory universe. As Martin Redfern described, “Many don’t agree with John Wheeler, but if he’s right then we and presumably other conscious observers throughout the universe, are the creators — or at least the minds that make the universe manifest.”

The idea that consciousness precedes the material world has a rich history. It is found across philosophies and religious traditions. Where physical reality is seen as a dream or construct of a mind or soul.

For it is the same thing that can be thought and that can be.

Parmenides in “fragment 3” (c. 475 B.C.)

A few millennia later, the philosopher George Berkeley echoed Parmenides, concluding that “to be is to be perceived.”

It is indeed widely believed that all perceptible objects — houses, mountains, rivers, and so on — really exist independently of being perceived by the understanding. But however widely and confidently this belief may be held, anyone who has the courage to challenge it will — if I’m not mistaken — see that it involves an obvious contradiction. For what are houses, mountains, rivers etc. but things we perceive by sense?

George Berkeley in “The Principles of Human Knowledge” (1710)

Hindus believe the universal mind, or world soul Atman, became the universe. Accordingly, the universe is not real, but the dream of a God under the spell of māyā — a temporary ignorance of the true reality.

Buddhists believe that the mind underlies and forms everything.

All the phenomena of existence have mind as their precursor, mind as their supreme leader, and of mind are they made.

Gautama Buddha in “The Dhammapada” (c. 500 B.C.)

The Taoist philosopher Zhuang Zhou said the world is a dream.

While he is dreaming he does not know it is a dream, and in his dream he may even try to interpret a dream. Only after he wakes does he know it was a dream. And someday there will be a great awakening when we know that this is all a great dream.

Zhuang Zhou in “Zhuangzi” (c. 300 B.C.)

Reviewing Answers

We’ve considered seven proposals for self-existent things:

  1. Logic
  2. Truth
  3. Numbers
  4. Possibility
  5. The Universe
  6. A Higher Plane
  7. Consciousness

Yet so far, none of these is satisfactory as an ultimate explanation. None stands out as a final Because that doesn’t throw up a further Why.

Abstract Entities: Logic, Truth, Numbers

First, we have abstract entities: logic, truth, and numbers. But though these things are plausibly causeless, how could they cause anything?

These things are eternal and unchanging, not to mention abstract. How can they cause anything like the huge dynamic universe we see?

So the cause of the universe must (at least causally prior to the universe’s existence) transcend space and time and therefore cannot be physical or material. But there are only two kinds of things that could fall under such a description: either an abstract object (like a number) or else a mind (a soul, a self). But abstract objects don’t stand in causal relations. This is part of what it means to be abstract. The number 7, for example, doesn’t cause anything.

William Lane Craig in “Reasonable Faith” (1994)

Possibility: Mathematical Consistency

What about all possibility? If all possible things exist, then our universe would be counted among those possible things.

But why should possible things be actual? As J. J. C. Smart remarked, “That anything should exist at all does seem to me a matter for the deepest awe.” Existence is what we seek to explain.

And there is another issue: why is our universe so simple and ordered compared to all else that exists in the space of all possibility?

Tegmark’s proposal, however, faces a formidable problem. The number of mathematical structures increases with increasing complexity, suggesting that “typical” structures should be horrendously large and cumbersome. This seems to be in conflict with the simplicity and beauty of the theories describing our world.

Alexander Vilenkin in “Many Worlds in One” (2006)

The Physical: The Universe, Physical Law

If the universe alone exists, it explains exactly what we see.

But there would be lingering questions. Why does consciousness exist? Are abstract entities real? And perhaps the biggest mystery of all: “Why should this universe, or its laws, be the only real ones?

As Lee Smolin asked, “Why do these laws, and not others, hold in our universe?” Does the existence of laws require some higher principle?

Although science may solve the problem of how the universe began, it can not answer the question: Why does the universe bother to exist? Maybe only God can answer that.

Stephen Hawking in interview (1988)

Higher Planes: God, Multiverse, Simulation

We might appeal to a higher cause to explain the universe we see.

But as J. J. C. Smart reminds us, “If we postulate God in addition to the created universe we increase the complexity of our hypothesis. We have all the complexity of the universe itself, and we have in addition the at least equal complexity of God.”

This seems true for any higher principle.

For example, if we presume our universe is the result of a simulation in a higher reality, what’s responsible for that higher reality?

Whatever our final theory of physics, we will be left facing an irreducible mystery. For perhaps there could have been nothing at all. Not even empty space, but just absolutely nothing […] If you believe God is the creator, well, why is God that way? The religious person is left with a mystery which is no less than the mystery with which science leaves us.

Steven Weinberg in “Closer to Truth: Cosmos, Consciousness, God” (2008, 2009)

The Mental: Mind, Soul, Consciousness

If consciousness is causeless, it could explain why perceptions exist.

But if reality is only a dream or illusion, why do our perceptions appear to follow along with a universe adhering to physical laws?

If it’s all an illusion, what’s the source of this illusion?

Even if everything in this universe were an illusion, there would still have to be something outside this universe that generates the illusion.

John A. Leslie and Robert Lawrence Kuhn in “The Mystery of Existence” (2013)

A Causeless Cause

What we seek, and have so far have failed to identify, is a causeless cause.

This is, something that not only has a plausibly self-existent and causeless nature, but also plausibly accounts for the reality we see.

We’ve found things that appear to be causeless: logic, truth, and numbers — but these things also appear incapable of being a cause.

Conversely, we’ve found things that could be a cause: the universe, a higher plane, and consciousness — but they don’t seem causeless.

Then there is possibility, for which we have reason to question whether it is causeless and whether it causes what we see.

CauselessCause
LogicPlausibleDoubtful
TruthPlausibleDoubtful
NumbersPlausibleDoubtful
PossibilityQuestionableQuestionable
The UniverseDoubtfulPlausible
A Higher PlaneDoubtfulPlausible
ConsciousnessDoubtfulPlausible

We find an almost inverse relation: The more plausibly something is causeless, the less plausible it seems to be the cause for what we see.

A causeless cause would provide us with a complete explanation.

It would explain both itself and the properties of observed reality. It would describe the relation between the mental and material. It would tell us why the universe exists and why it has simple, ordered laws.

To progress we need to find the connecting glue — the missing piece of the puzzle that shows either how a causeless thing accounts for the reality we see, or alternatively, why the reality we see is causeless.

Three Modes of Existence

In reviewing the seven categories of possibly causeless things, we encountered three modes of existence. Loosely speaking they are:

  • Mathematical Existence
  • Material Existence
  • Mental Existence

Mathematical existence includes: abstract entities, logic, truth, numbers, math, properties, forms, equations, relations, possibility, structures, laws, and principles. This mode might include religious concepts of divine law/will/order (Tao/Logos), the infinite indivisible truth (Asha/Govinda), and divine mathematics.

Material existence includes: matter, energy, the vacuum, spacetime, physical law, the universe, the multiverse, particles, forces, fields, and physical systems. This mode might include what religions refer to as creation, kosmos, the material plane, and māyā/illusion.

Mental existence includes: mind, consciousness, observations, perceptions, ideas, and dreams. This mode might include religious concepts of the mind of god, world soul, Atman, and souls or spirits.

What exists most fundamentally? Math, Matter, or Mind?
What is the relation between the three modes of existence: math, matter, and mind?

My viewpoint allows for three different kinds of reality: the physical, the mental and the Platonic-mathematical, with something (as yet) profoundly mysterious in the relations between the three.

Roger Penrose in “The Big Questions: What is reality?” (2006)

Math, Matter, Mind

Of the three modes of existence, does any stand out as being more fundamental than any of the others? What is their relation?

If one of these modes of existence can be shown as primary, while the others are derivative, then we might close in on a causeless cause.

A common view of physicists is that matter produces mind, and mind produces math. But even among physicists, this view isn’t universal.

The triangle suggests the circularity of the widespread view that math arises from the mind, the mind arises out of matter, and that matter can be explained in terms of math. Non-physicists should be wary of any claim that modern physics leads us to any particular resolution of this circularity, since even the sample of three theoretical physicists writing this paper hold three divergent views.

Piet Hut, Mark Alford, and Max Tegmark in “On Math, Matter, and Mind” (2006)

What is the reality of these modes of existence? Are all on equal footing? Or is one more fundamental while the others are derivative?

Materialism: Matter is Primary

Materialism is the view that matter is fundamental.

It assumes mental states are the byproduct of particular material arrangements (e.g. brains) and that mathematical objects, if they exist at all outside of minds, have no bearing on the material world.

Materialism is a popular, if not conventional, view among physicists.

Materialism can explain why our perceptions follow the patterns of physical law, but it has difficulty explaining why matter gives rise to mental states — this is the so-called hard-problem of consciousness.

Materialism also hits an explanatory dead-end trying to answer why matter exists and why it follows simple physical laws.

If eager to know the world’s structure, ask the scientists. Science, however, seems unable to answer some key questions concerning the structure. For start, why is the structure an orderly one? Why do events so often develop in fairly simple and familiar ways, leading us to talk of causal laws? […]

Then there is what can seem the biggest question of all. Science investigates the world’s structure, but why is there anything at all to be structured? Why is there a cosmos, not a blank? Why is there something rather than nothing? Science cannot answer this.

John Leslie in “A Cosmos Existing through Ethical Necessity” (2009)

Idealism: Mind is Primary

Idealism is the view that mind is fundamental.

It assumes mental states are the basis of reality, and that the matter that seems to exist, exists only as thoughts and perceptions in minds.

Idealism is expressed by Eastern religions, theologians, and mystics. But increasingly, physicists recognize they can’t so easily do away with the observer. It seems the observer plays a necessary, if not fundamental, role in any description of reality.

Consciousness cannot be accounted for in physical terms. For consciousness is absolutely fundamental. It cannot be accounted for in terms of anything else.

Erwin Schrödinger in interview (1931)

But idealism doesn’t answer everything. It doesn’t explain why minds are bound up with the patterns of matter in a material world.

We find that our perceptions obey some laws, which can be most conveniently formulated if we assume that there is some underlying reality beyond our perceptions. This model of a material world obeying laws of physics is so successful that soon we forget about our starting point and say that matter is the only reality, and perceptions are nothing but a useful tool for the description of matter. This assumption is almost as natural (and maybe as false) as our previous assumption that space is only a mathematical tool for the description of matter. We are substituting reality of our feelings by the successfully working theory of an independently existing material world. And the theory is so successful that we almost never think about its possible limitations.

Andrei Linde in “Inflation, Quantum Cosmology, and the Anthropic Principle” (2002)

Platonism: Math is Primary

Platonism is the idea that math is fundamental.

It assumes abstract objects are the most real, and that everything we see and perceive is somehow derivative from this higher existence.

Platonism is popular among philosophers and mathematicians, whose job is to study the objective properties of abstract things.

If mathematical objects form the basis of reality, it might explain why the material world is so mathematical in its form.

In a famous 1959 lecture, physicist Eugine P. Wigner argued that “the enormous usefulness of mathematics in the natural sciences is something bordering on the mysterious.” Conversely, mathematical structures have an eerily real feel to them. They satisfy a central criterion of objective existence: they are the same no matter who studies them. A theorem is true regardless of whether it is proved by a human, a computer or an intelligent dolphin. Contemplative alien civilizations would find the same mathematical structures as we have. Accordingly mathematicians commonly say that they discover mathematical structures rather than create them.

Max Tegmark in “Parallel Universes” (2003)

Where Platonism falls short is in explaining how abstract objects lead to material or mental existence. According to Leibniz, the difficulty is explaining, “how from eternal or essential metaphysical truths there arise temporal, contingent or physical truths.”

What Came First?

For each of the three modes of existence, there is an ancient school of thought holding that mode of existence as most fundamental.

The Mathematical: Plato believed that abstract entities were the most real and that the material world was derivative.

The Material: Plato’s foremost student Aristotle, disagreed, saying material substances were more real than abstract forms.

The Mental: Several centuries later, Plotinus argued that mind was more real than the material reality it perceives.

Today’s scientists, mathematicians, and philosophers seem no closer to an answer on whether math, matter, or mind came first.

  • Does mind give rise to math, or does math give rise to mind?
  • Does matter give rise to mind, or does mind give rise to matter?
  • Does math give rise to matter, or does matter give rise to math?

To unravel the mystery of existence requires that we understand the relationship between these modes of existence. Only then do we have any hope of identifying an ultimate explanation: a causeless cause.

To address the nature of reality we need to understand its connection to consciousness and mathematics.

Roger Penrose in “The Big Questions: What is reality?” (2006)

Are They One?

Various thinkers have suspected the three modes of existence to be connected and perhaps are all aspects of one ultimate reality.

Mind and Matter as One?

Modern physical experiments have revealed something inseparable between the mind and the observed physical reality.

As we penetrate into matter, nature does not show us any isolated ‘basic building blocks’, but rather appears as a complicated web of relations between the various parts of the whole. These relations always include the observer in an essential way. The human observer constitutes the final link in the chain of observational processes, and the properties of any atomic object can only be understood in terms of interaction with the observer. This means that the classical ideal of an objective description of nature is no longer valid. The Cartesian partition between the I and the world, between the observer and the observed, cannot be made when dealing with atomic matter. In atomic physics, we can never speak about nature without, at the same time, speaking about ourselves.

Fritjof Capra in “The Tao of Physics” (1975)

Aren’t we mistaken in making this separation between ‘the universe’ and ‘life and mind’? Shouldn’t we seek ways to think of them as one?

John Archibald Wheeler quoted in “Trespassing on Einstein’s Lawn” (2014)

Math and Matter as One?

Likewise, mathematicians and scientists cannot help but notice a mysterious link connecting mathematics and the physical world.

There exists, unless I am mistaken, an entire world consisting of the totality of mathematical truths, which is accessible to us only through our intelligence, just as there exists the world of physical realities; each one is independent of us, both of them divinely created and appear different only because of the weakness of our mind; but, for a more powerful intelligence, they are one and the same thing, whose synthesis is partially revealed in that marvelous correspondence between abstract mathematics on the one hand and astronomy and all branches of physics on the other.

Charles Hermite in “Eloges Académiques et Discours” (translation p. 323) (1912)

Maybe the relationships are all that exist. Maybe the world is made of math. At first that sounded nuts, but when I thought about it I had to wonder, what exactly is the other option? That the world is made of “things”? What the hell is a “thing”? It was one of those concepts that fold under the slightest interrogation. Look closely at any object and you find it’s an amalgamation of particles. But look closely at the particles and you find that they are irreducible representations of the Poincaré symmetry group―whatever that meant. The point is, particles, at bottom, look a lot like math.

Amanda Gefter in “Trespassing on Einstein’s Lawn” (2014)

All as One?

If matter and mind are two aspects of one reality, and if math and matter are likewise two aspects of one reality, then all three must be connected — all would be reflections of one underlying reality.

So how do the elements of the trinity fit together: the “phenomenological” world, the “physical” world, and the “mathematical” world? On the unargued assumption that the principle underlying ultimate reality is radically simple, it will here be conjectured that these three realms are one-and-the-same under different descriptions.

David Pearce in “Why Does Anything Exist?” (1995)

A Path to Reality

For millennia, philosophers have debated the relation between math, matter, and mind. For millennia, they’ve sought a causeless cause.

Raphael's masterpiece The School of Athens depicts philosophers at Plato's Academy (1511)
 Raphael’s masterpiece The School of Athens depicts philosophers at Plato’s Academy (1511)

Despite this, philosophy has not yielded any definitive answers.

Perhaps science can shed new light on this question. Science allows us to test and decide among competing theories. Science provides opportunities to discover the missing piece of the puzzle and explain how and why a causeless thing gives rise to the reality we see.

As it happens, discoveries in the field of mathematics in the 20th century found this missing puzzle piece. We now know a viable link between “eternal or essential metaphysical truths” and “temporal, contingent or physical truths.” We can explain how reality can emerge from self-existent, causeless truth concerning numbers and their relations.

But without hard science and observational evidence to back it up, how can we ever know if this explanation is right? How can we ever escape from the morass of inconclusive philosophy?

Fortunately, discoveries in the fields of physics and cosmology — also occurring in the 20th century — provide exactly this support. We not only have found a plausible path to reality, we have evidence for it.

20th Century Mathematics

Many consider the field of mathematics to be mostly uneventful — unchanged since Euclid defined the laws of geometry 2,300 years ago.

But at the turn of the 20th century, the field of mathematics was in a state of crisis. The field was shaken to its foundation. Math was broken, and it had to be rebuilt from scratch. During this reformation, monumental discoveries shocked and dismayed mathematicians.

In the first half of the 20th century, logicians and mathematicians discovered a provably self-existent thing. In the second half of the 20th century, they showed how — under certain assumptions — this self-existent thing could account for the reality we see.

Might this thing be our causeless cause?

Let’s see what mathematicians found, and how they came to find it.

The Foundational Crisis

At the turn of the 20th century, math was in trouble. It was undergoing what came to be called the foundational crisis of mathematics.

At the time, set theory had come to serve as the foundation of mathematics. All mathematical proofs ultimately relied on it.

But in 1899, Ernst Zermelo noticed this set theory had a fatal flaw. Zermelo told other math professors at the University of Göttingen about it, including David Hilbert, but Zermelo didn’t publish it.

In 1901, Bertrand Russell also noticed this flaw. But Russell didn’t stay quiet. He wrote a letter in 1902 to Gottlob Frege, just as his second volume on set theory was going off to the publisher.

Frege had spent decades laying the foundation of set theory. It was his life’s work. But one letter, showing one flaw, brought it all down.

Russell showed Frege’s set theory allows two contradictory statements to both be proved. This flaw is known as Russell’s paradox.

One flaw might not sound so bad, but in math it is fatal. For if in math, just one falsehood can be proved, then any falsehood can be proved.

This is known as the principle of explosion.

For example, assume mathematics had a flaw that allowed you to prove that “2 + 2 = 5”. You could use this false proof to prove anything. You could prove that the $1 in your bank account equals $1,000,000.

\def\arraystretch{1.5}
   \begin{array}{l:l}
   2 + 2 = 5                      & \text{(given)} \\ \hline
   0 = 1                            & \text{(subtract 4 from both sides)} \\ \hline
   0 = \text{999,999}     & \text{(multiply both sides by 999,999)} \\ \hline
   1 = \text{1,000,000}  & \text{(add 1 to both sides)} \\ 
\end{array}

If math allowed proofs of false statements, then contracts, commerce — even society as we know it — couldn’t function. This was the state of mathematics in 1900 — it’s no wonder it was considered a crisis.

Math was broken. It had to be fixed. It needed a rallying cry.

A Call to Action

In 1900, mathematicians from around the world gathered in Paris for the International Congress of Mathematicians.

Mathematicians from around the globe gathered in Paris in 1900.
Mathematicians from around the globe gathered in Paris in 1900.

David Hilbert, considered the greatest mathematician of his time, was invited to speak. He used the opportunity to present what he considered to be the 23 most significant open problems in mathematics.

The second of Hilbert’s problems called for a proof that the foundational rules of mathematics were free of contradictions.

This would, once and for all, put math on a solid foundation. Never again would mathematicians need worry that a new contradiction might one day surface and torpedo the whole of mathematics.

New Foundations

The collapse of Frege’s set theory and Hilbert’s call for a provably solid foundation for math served as an inspiration.

Under Hilbert’s direction, Zermelo, began work on fixing set theory.

Similarly, Bertrand Russell began work with his supervisor, Alfred North Whitehead, on a solution. Their aim was to lay a new foundation for mathematics based on a precise logic, and produce a set theory rid of paradoxes and contradictions.

It was a massive undertaking that took over a decade. It culminated in the three volume tome Principia Mathematica, published in 1910, 1912, and 1913. It was so detailed, that it famously required several hundred pages to work up to the point where it proved ‘1 + 1 = 2’.

The three volume set of Principia Mathematica, (The Principles of Mathematics), took Russell and Whitehead over a decade to write. Image Credit: Lars Tyge Nielsen
The three volume set of Principia Mathematica, (The Principles of Mathematics), took Russell and Whitehead over a decade to write. Image Credit: Lars Tyge Nielsen

Owing to its complexity and unique notation, Principia Mathematica never gained much popularity with mathematicians.

It also had a competitor.

By 1908, Zermelo developed a new set theory, consisting of just eight rules. And in 1921, it was further improved by Abraham Fraenkel. Their combined result is called Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory. It became the default foundation of mathematics, and remains so to this day.

Hilbert’s Program

Although no one had discovered contradictions in either Russell’s or Zermelo’s new foundational systems, no one had been able to prove they were free of contradictions either.

Mathematics still rested on a foundation of uncertain stability.

This led Hilbert, in 1921, to push for finding a mathematical theory that was provably consistent. And not only did he want this theory to be provably consistent, he wanted it to be provably complete.

A complete system of mathematics means any true statement can be proven within that theory. There would never be a need to add to this complete theory, as it would cover everything that mathematicians might think up in the future. It would be a final theory and the last theory any mathematician would ever need.

It was the mathematician’s equivalent of a theory of everything — where all of mathematics is derivable from one rock-solid foundation.

The effort to find this theory became known as Hilbert’s Program.

It was a noble goal. But less than a decade after launching his program, Hilbert’s dream of a final theory was shattered.

In 1930, at a conference in Königsberg, Hilbert remained confident in the eventual success of his program, proclaiming: “Wir müssen wissen. Wir werden wissen.” — “We must know. We will know.”

David Hilbert's tombstone in Göttingen. The inscription reads: "Wir mussen wissen. Wir werden wissen." Meaning "We must know. We will know." Image Credit: Wikimedia
The phrase would later be Hilbert’s epitaph. His tombstone in Göttingen is inscribed: “Wir müssen wissen. Wir werden wissen.” Image Credit: Wikimedia

Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorems

Unknown to Hilbert, his dream had already been crushed. The day before, at the very same conference, the 24-year-old Kurt Gödel presented his PhD thesis. It proved Hilbert’s dream is impossible.

At the conference Gödel presented his First Incompleteness Theorem. It showed that in any finite mathematical foundation, there will be true statements that can’t be proved in that theory.

Thus Hilbert’s dream of completeness is impossible.

The most comprehensive current formal systems are the system of Principia Mathematica (PM) on the one hand, the Zermelo-Fraenkelian axiom-system of set theory on the other hand. These two systems are so far developed that you can formalize in them all proof methods that are currently in use in mathematics, i.e. you can reduce these proof methods to a few axioms and deduction rules. Therefore, the conclusion seems plausible that these deduction rules are sufficient to decide all mathematical questions expressible in those systems. We will show that this is not true.

Kurt Gödel in “On formally undecidable propositions of Principia Mathematica and related systems I” (1931)

Gödel’s first incompleteness theorem showed there could never be a final theory that would serve mathematicians for all time.

Gödel wasn’t finished.

Shortly thereafter, he published his Second Incompleteness Theorem. This proved that no consistent theory of mathematics can ever prove itself to be consistent. The 2nd of Hilbert’s 23 problems was impossible.

This explained the failure of Zermelo in proving the consistency of his set theory. It was actually a good sign that he was unable to — had he been able to prove it consistent, it would imply that it was not.

So now, not only was completeness impossible, but it was also impossible for a theory to prove its own consistency.

This was a double whammy to Hilbert. Hilbert lived another 12 years but he never publicly acknowledged Gödel’s result. Privately, he was crushed — he didn’t want mathematics to be this way.

But others greatly admired Gödel and his achievement.

When Harvard gave Gödel an honorary degree, he was introduced as “The discoverer of the most significant mathematical truth in the century.” Some called Gödel “the greatest logician since Aristotle.” Edward Nelson called Aristotle “the greatest logician before Gödel.”

John von Neumann said, “Gödel is absolutely irreplaceable; he is the only mathematician alive about whom I would dare make this statement.”

Einstein and Gödel both worked at the Institute for Advanced Study. Near the end of his life, Einstein confided to Oskar Morgenstern that his "own work no longer meant much, that he came to the Institute merely to have the privilege of walking home with Gödel."
Einstein and Gödel both worked at the Institute for Advanced Study. Near the end of his life, Einstein confided to Oskar Morgenstern that his “own work no longer meant much, that he came to the Institute merely to have the privilege of walking home with Gödel.”

Undecidability

In 1673, Leibniz invented and later built the first digital calculator. He declared, “It is beneath the dignity of excellent men to waste their time in calculation when any peasant could do the work just as accurately with the aid of a machine.”

After he built the device, Leibniz began to wonder about the limits of what machines can calculate: was it possible to build a machine that could answer any mathematical question?

Several centuries later, David Hilbert together with Wilhelm Ackermann refined Leibniz’s question. At a conference in Berlin in 1928, they defined the Entscheidungsproblem (or decision problem).

The decision problem asks: is it possible to build a machine that can decide whether or not any mathematical question can be proved in some mathematical system?

Gödel showed that not every true statement was provable, but was there a way to decide whether or not a statement was provable?

It was an important question.

Such a method would be most useful to mathematicians. It would tell them when they ought to give up, and thereby save them from wasting their lives searching for proofs that don’t exist.

Alonzo Church got the first result on the Entscheidungsproblem. He defined a programming language, and proved certain questions about it are undecidable.

It follows that the Entscheidungsproblem is unsolvable in the case of any system of symbolic logic which is [consistent] in the sense of Gödel.

Alonzo Church in “An Unsolvable Problem of Elementary Number Theory” (1935)

The next year, Church’s student, Alan Turing, published another example of an undecidable problem — the halting problem.

Gödel has shown that there are propositions U such that neither U nor [not U] is provable. […] On the other hand, I shall show that there is no general method which tells whether a given formula U is provable.

Alan Turing in “On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the Entscheidungsproblem” (1936)

It was in this paper that Turing introduced the concept of a general purpose programmable computer, birthing the digital age.

The code breaking Bombe computer was devised by Alan Turing to break German codes.
The code breaking Bombe computer was devised by Alan Turing to break German codes.

Hilbert never got the answers he hoped for. We can’t prove the consistency of a mathematical foundation. We can’t prove everything that is true, and given undecidability, we can’t even be sure whether a statement has a proof or not.

And yet, despite not getting the answers he hoped for, Hilbert knew the right questions to ask. The answers produced great discoveries.

I’d like to make the outrageous claim, that has a little bit of truth, that actually all of this that’s happening now with the computer taking over the world, the digitalization of our society, of information in human society, you could say in a way is the result of a philosophical question that was raised by David Hilbert at the beginning of the century.

Gregory Chaitin in “A Century of Controversy Over the Foundations of Mathematics” (2000)

Hilbert’s 10th Problem

Of Hilbert’s 23 problems, his 10th problem asked for a general method to solve Diophantine equations. These are equations that allow only whole numbers, (no decimals or fractions), which are named after Diophantus who studied them in the 3rd century.

Given a Diophantine equation with any number of unknown quantities and with rational integral numerical coefficients: To devise a process according to which it can be determined in a finite number of operations whether the equation is solvable in rational integers.

David Hilbert in “Mathematical problems” (1902)

Deceptively simple Diophantine equations were often notoriously difficult. A famous example is the Diophantine equation:

a^n = b^n + c^n

This equation is easy when n = 1, or when n = 2. Millennia ago Pythagoras proved there were infinite solutions when n = 2.

And yet, no one had found even one solution for n \ge 3. No one knew of a cube number (a^{3}) that was the sum of two other cube numbers.

In 1673, Pierre de Fermat wrote in his notes that he had a proof that there were no solutions when n \ge 3. But no one had ever found it, nor was anyone able to rediscover a proof.

The missing proof became known as Fermat’s last theorem.

The problem went unsolved for 321 years. Until in 1994, after seven years of work, Andrew Wiles completed a 129-page proof that no whole number solutions exist when n \ge 3.

If mathematicians had a procedure to solve Diophantine equations, Andrew Wiles wouldn’t have had to spend seven years working on this problem. Instead, he could program a computer to follow the procedure and the computer would crank out a solution.

In 1970, Hilbert’s 10th problem was solved.

Solving it required 21 years of work by four mathematicians: Martin Davis, Julia Robinson, Hilary Putnam and Yuri Matijasevič.

Their proof, called the MRDP-Theorem (after their initials), gave a negative result. They proved there is no general procedure for solving Diophantine equations — and they proved it in a shocking way.

They showed an equivalence between solutions to Diophantine equations and what is computable. In other words, for any imaginable computer program, there is a Diophantine equation whose solutions equal all the outputs of that computer program.

This was so surprising that many mathematicians had difficulty believing it. It meant there is a Diophantine equation that picks chess moves like Deep Blue, and there’s a Diophantine equation that does your taxes like TurboTax, and there’s yet another Diophantine equation that does spellchecking like Microsoft Word.

For anything a computer can compute, there’s a Diophantine equation that gives the exact same answers.

But despite how surprising their result was, it was true.

And this is why there can be no general method for solving Diophantine equations: because the question of whether or not a program finishes (Turing’s halting problem) is equivalent to asking whether or not some Diophantine equation has solutions.

Since the halting problem is not generally solvable, the equivalence between Diophantine equations and computers meant Diophantine equations weren’t generally solvable either.

Yet again, what Hilbert asked for couldn’t be provided.

Hilbert’s questions probed at the heart of consistency, provability, decidability, and computability. They didn’t lead where he expected, but they did reveal deep truths about the nature of mathematics.

Universal Equations

In 1978, the mathematician James P. Jones went a step further. Just as it is possible to make a computer program that runs all other computer programs, it is also possible to make a Diophantine equation that includes all other Diophantine equations.

Matijasevič’s Theorem implies also the existence of particular undecidable diophantine equations. In fact there must exist universal diophantine equations, polynomial analogues of the universal Turing machine.

James P. Jones in “Undecidable Diophantine Equations” (1980)

Such Diophantine equations are general purpose computers: plug in the ‘program’ as one of the variables to the equation, and the solutions to the equation will be the outputs of that program.

Jones provided an example of such an equation. It is complex, but the truths concerning this single equation include all truths concerning the executions and outputs of all computer programs.

\text{In order that } x \in W_{v} \text{ it is necessary and sufficient that the} \\ \text{following equation has a solution in positive integers:}
\\ \text{}
 \\ 
(v - (((zuy)^2 + u)^2 + y))^2 + (elg^2 + \alpha - (b - xy)q^2)^2 + \\
(q - b^{5^{60}})^2 + (\lambda + q^4 - (1 +\lambda b^5))^2 + \\
(\theta + 2z - b^5)^2 + (l - (u + t \theta))^2 + (e - (y + m \theta))^2 + \\
(n - q^{16})^2 + (r - ([g + eq^3 + lq^5 + (2(e - z \lambda)(1 + xb^5 + g)^4 + \\
\lambda b^5 + \lambda b^5 q^4)q^4][n^2 - n]+ [q^3 -bl + l + \theta \lambda q^3 + \\
(b^5 - 2)q^5][n^2 - 1]))^2 +  (p - 2ws^2 r^2 n^2)^2 + \\
(p^2k^2 - k^2 + 1 - \tau^2)^2 + (4(c - ksn^2)^2 + \eta - k^2)^2 + \\
(k - (r + 1 + hp - h))^2 + (a - (wn^2 + 1)rsn^2)^2 + \\
(c - (2r + 1 + \varphi))^2 + (d - (bw + ca -2c + 4\alpha \gamma - 5 \gamma))^2 + \\
(d^2 - ((a^2 -1)c^2 + 1))^2 + (f^2 - ((a^2 - 1)i^2 c^4 + 1))^2 + \\
((d + of)^2 - (((a + f^2(d^2 - a))^2 - 1)(2r + 1 + jc)^2 + 1))^2 = 0

As [v] varies through the positive integers, the [equation] defines every recursively enumerable set. This is, to our mind, the attraction of the universal equations. At once, [this equation defines] primes, Fibonacci numbers, Lucas numbers, perfect numbers, theorems of ZF, or indeed theorems of any other axiomatizable theory.

James P. Jones in “Three Universal Representations of Recursively Enumerable Sets” (1978)

We might consider such universal equations as ‘God Equations‘ — equations whose solutions contain and include all the others.

In his 1987 book Algorithmic Information Theory, Gregory Chaitin describes one such equation: the “Exponential Diophantine Equation Computer.” It has 20,000 variables and is two hundred pages long.

This equation perfectly replicates the behavior of the LISP programming language. He describes the equation as follows:

If the LISP expression k has no value, then this equation will have no solution. If the LISP expression k has a value, then this equation will have exactly one solution. In this unique solution, n = the value of the expression k.

Gregory Chaitin in “META MATH! The Quest for Omega” (2004)

Chaitin showed that even modern day computers and programming languages have counterparts in the form of Diophantine equations.

Universal Diophantine equations are remarkable. They exist in pure arithmetic. The arithmetical relations they encode represent every program that can be computed along with all of their outputs.

Among these solutions we can find the valid proofs of every theorem in every mathematical system, every way of playing every computer game that has or will ever be invented, and simulations of every galaxy in the observable universe down to the atomic level.

Universal Diophantine equations contain in their solutions everything computable. Since known physical laws are computable, quantum-detailed simulations of every particle in the observable universe are counted among these solutions. Image Credit: Wikipedia
Universal Diophantine equations contain in their solutions everything computable. Since known physical laws are computable, quantum-detailed histories of every particle interaction in the observable universe are counted among these solutions. Image Credit: Wikipedia

Jones’s discovery of universal Diophantine equations inspired him to quote chapter 11, verse 7 of the Bhagavad Gita: “Whatever you wish can be seen all at once right here. This universal form can show you all that you now desire. Everything is here completely.”

Given that such equations include everything computable, including all physical laws and systems as well as simulations of any observer’s mind and brain — could these equations be the glue connecting eternal mathematical truths with contingent physical truths?

The Universal Dovetailer

In 1991, Bruno Marchal wrote a program he called the Universal Dovetailer — a program that generates and runs all programs.

In order to run every program without getting stuck on a program that never ends, the Universal Dovetailer interleaves, or dovetails, on the processing, doing a little bit of work on each program at a time.

The program is simple. The full program is quite short, consisting of about 300 lines of LISP code. Its pseudocode is even simpler:

for k from 0 to ∞:
    for j from 0 to k:
        for i from 0 to j:
            // Compute k steps of program i on input j

This program sequentially generates every program and runs it for every input. The longer the Universal Dovetailer runs, the more programs it generates and the more steps of each program it performs. If allowed to run forever, it runs every program there is.

The Universal Dovetailer, like a fractal, is itself simple and yet it generates infinite complexity. “For that which generates is always simpler than that which is generated.” — Plotinus in “The Enneads III.8.9” (270 A.D.)

This program, like universal Diophantine equations, contains all.

While studying the consequences of the existence of all computations, Marchal made an incredible discovery: what he describes as the “many-histories interpretation of elementary arithmetic.”

The discovery served as the basis of his 1998 PhD thesis, Computability, Physics and Cognition. This paper explains how we can explain the appearance of a multiverse given two assumptions:

  1. All computations exist
  2. Computation supports cognition

We will explain that once we adopt the computationalist hypothesis, which is a form of mechanist assumption, we have to derive from it how our belief in the physical laws can emerge from only arithmetic and classical computer science.

Bruno Marchal in “The computationalist reformulation of the mind-body problem” (2013)

Given there exist universal Diophantine equations, all computations exist as a consequence of arithmetical truth concerning them.

While there is no physical realization of the perpetual execution of the Universal Dovetailer, its complete execution exists in number theory as a consequence of arithmetical truth. There are, for instance, Diophantine equations whose solutions exactly equal all the sequentially generated states reached by the Universal Dovetailer.

So if we accept the self-existent truth of ‘2 + 2 = 4’, we must also accept truths concerning universal Diophantine equations — truths that concern all computational histories and all simulated realities.

To be sure, the existence of the UD is a logical consequence of elementary arithmetic with Church’s thesis or Turing’s thesis.

Bruno Marchal in discussion list (2019)

It therefore becomes a purely mathematical question to prove whether some Diophantine equation contains in its solutions a computational state equivalent to some person’s physical brain state.

We would then exist for the same reason that ‘2 + 2 = 4’ — as an inevitable consequence of mathematical truth. The question “Why is there anything at all?” is reduced to “Why does 2 + 2 = 4?”

A Story of Creation

We have arrived at a plausible story of creation.

We can now connect the causeless abstract entities: logic, truth, and numbers, with a viable cause for our perceptions of a physical reality.

Why does anything exist?

Because necessity requires logical laws; logical laws imply incontrovertible truth; such truth includes mathematical truth; mathematical truth defines numbers; numbers possess number relations; number relations imply equations; equations define computable relations; computable relations define all computations; all computations include algorithmically generated observers; and these observers experience apparent physical realities.

Ancient Anticipations

This account of how eternal mathematical truths could give rise to contingent physical truths depended on recent discoveries.

It required a deep understanding of modern ideas: universal equations, computers, computation, virtual reality, and simulation.

Only a century ago, we didn’t even have words for these concepts. Despite this, a few ancient thinkers gave theories for existence that are eerily similar to this modern creation story.

They postulated something primal and simple that gave rise to the numbers, and from numbers arose beings, consciousness, and matter.

2,600 years ago, Laozi wrote that numbers proceed from The Tao and that from numbers that all things are born:

The Tao gives birth to One.
One gives birth to Two.
Two gives birth to Three.
Three gives birth to all things.

Laozi in chapter 42 of “Tao Te Ching” (c. 600 B.C.)

Diogenes Laërtius was a biographer of eminent philosophers. The following is his account of 2,500-year-old Pythaogrean beliefs:

That the monad (one) was the beginning of everything. From the monad proceeds an indefinite duad (two), which is subordinate to the monad as to its cause. That from the monad and the indefinite duad proceed numbers. And from numbers signs. And from these last, lines of which plane figures consist. And from plane figures are derived solid bodies. And from solid bodies sensible bodies.

Diogenes Laërtius in “The Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers” (c. 225 A.D.)

1,750 years ago, Plotinus developed neoplatonism — a rich theory concerning the relations between various levels of being.

Wikipedia describes Plotinus’s chain of being as a series of emanations: “The first emanation is Nous (Divine Mind, Logos, Order, Thought, Reason) […] From Nous proceeds the World Soul. […] From the world soul proceeds individual human souls, and finally, matter, at the lowest level of being and thus the least perfected level of the cosmos.”

The One is not a Being but the generator of Being. [V.2.1]

The greatest, later than the [One], must be the [Intellectual-Principle], and it must be the second of all existence. [V.1.6] For what emanates from the Intellectual-Principle is a Reason-Principle, a Logos. [III.2.2]

And as soon as there is differentiation, number exists. [V.1.5]
Thus Number, the primal and true, is Principle and source of actuality to the Beings. [VI.6.15]

[The Soul’s] substantial-existence comes from the Intellectual-Principle. [V.1.3] The Soul, itself a Divine Thought and possessing the Divine Thoughts, or Ideas, of all things, contains all things concentred within it. [III.6.18]

This gives the degree in which the kosmos is ensouled, not by a soul belonging to it, but by one present to it; it is mastered not master; not possessor but possessed. [IV.3.9] This one universe is all bound together in shared experience. [IV.4.32] So matter is actually a phantasm. [II.5.5]

Plotinus in “The Enneads” (270 A.D.)

1,570 years ago, Proclus wrote that mathematical existence occupies a middle ground. He said mathematical being sits between the simple reality that’s grounded in itself and the things that move about in matter.

Mathematical being necessarily belongs neither among the first nor among the last and least simple of the kinds of being, but occupies the middle ground between the partless realities—simple, incomposite, and indivisible—and divisible things characterized by every variety of composition and differentiation. The unchangeable, stable, and incontrovertible character of the propositions about it shows that it is superior to the kinds of things that move about in matter. But the discursiveness of [mathematical] procedure, in dealing with its subjects as extended, and its setting up of different prior principles for different objects—these give to mathematical being a rank below that indivisible nature that is completely grounded in itself.

Proclus in “A Commentary on the First Book of Euclid’s Elements” (c. 450 A.D.)

The Causeless Cause Found?

Could this be the answer? Could things be so simple?

In order for this explanation of existence to be correct, mathematical truth must be causeless. Mathematical existence must depend on neither human minds, nor on physical or material things.

In addition, mathematical truth must be something capable of generating observers — observers who consciously perceive their environment and which they consider as existing physically.

Ideally, this causeless cause will illuminate the relation between the mental and material, and explain why the universe obeys simple laws.

Can the theory achieve this?

Is it Causeless?

For mathematical truth to serve as a causeless cause, it must exist causelessly. Math must depend on neither minds nor matter.

Independent of Minds

Do numbers and their properties exist beyond the minds of mathematicians and their scribblings on blackboards?

Does math only exist as a product of human minds?
Does math only exist as a product of human minds?

Had Hilbert’s program succeeded, and given a mathematical theory capable of proving all true statements, then arguably, mathematics might only be that which follows from this theory. Math would then be an invention of the human mind.

But the failure of Hilbert’s program, and Gödel’s proof of the impossibility for any finite theory to define all mathematical truth, meant that mathematical truth is infinite and beyond description, and therefore cannot be a product of human minds.

[The existence of] absolutely undecidable mathematical propositions, seems to disprove the view that mathematics is only our own creation; for the creator necessarily knows all properties of his creatures, because they can’t have any others except those he has given to them. So this alternative seems to imply that mathematical objects and facts (or at least something in them) exist objectively and independently of our mental acts and decisions, that is to say, [it seems to imply] some form or other of Platonism or ‘realism’ as to the mathematical objects.

Kurt Gödel in “Some basic theorems on the foundations of mathematics and their implications p. 311″ (1951)

(See: “Is math invented or discovered?“)

Independent of Matter

The infinite nature of mathematical truth also implies an independence from matter. Our observable universe has an information capacity of 10^{120} bits. This number is large, but finite.

An artist's representation of the finite observable universe. Image Credit: Wikimedia
An artist’s representation of the finite observable universe. Image Credit: Wikimedia

Nowhere in physics, is there room to store, represent, or hold the infinite true statements of mathematics. If there are infinite primes, infinite factors of zero, infinite digits of \pi, they don’t exist physically.

If these infinite properties don’t and can’t depend on physical processes operating within a material universe, it follows that mathematical properties must exist independently of matter.

It is our firm belief that the Pythagorean theorem needs not be created, nor the fact that the circumference of a circle is 3.14… times the diameter; the laws of nature and the collection of truths, values and their interrelations are primordial and have always existed.

C. W. Rietdijk in “Four-dimensional reality continued” (2018)

Is it the Cause?

For this story to work, abstract objects: truth, numbers, equations, and so on, must play a causal role in generating reality and perceptions.

The default position of philosophers has been that abstract objects have no effects — they cause and do nothing. But we must admit that this has always been an assumption, it’s never been proven.

Although philosophers deny that abstract objects can have causal effects on concrete objects (abstract objects are often defined as causally inert), their potential, say as a collective, to be an explanatory source of ultimate reality cannot be logically excluded.

John A. Leslie and Robert Lawrence Kuhn in “The Mystery of Existence” (2013)

Recent advances in mathematics give us pause. The discovery that all computations exist as a consequence of mathematical truth, makes us wonder whether abstract mathematics is really so ineffectual.

But can mind or matter really be created by math?

The Cause of Minds

Consciousness remains one of humanity’s last great mysteries. While science has not settled the question of what consciousness is, it has progressed by developing a testable theory of consciousness.

In the 1600s, thinkers such as René Descartes and Thomas Hobbes advanced the idea of mechanism — the theory that our brains and bodies are machines that operate according to mechanical rules.

In 1936, the discovery of universal machines (or computers) led to the Church-Turing thesis, which says the behavior of any finite machine can be perfectly replicated by an appropriately programmed computer.

This is their special power. It is what makes computers so useful.

Without changing your computer's hardware, it is able to run any one of the millions of applications available to it, including applications not yet developed or conceived of. Each new application provides the computer with new functionality and behaviors.
Without changing your computer’s hardware, it is able to run any one of the millions of applications available to it, including applications not yet developed or conceived of. Each new application provides the computer with new functionality and behaviors.

Some were quick to recognize the implications of the Church-Turing thesis for theories of minds, brains, and consciousness.

The two fathers of computing, Alan Turing and John von Neumann, noticed parallels between computers and the mind. In 1948, Turing wrote the first chess playing program and in his 1950 paper Computing Machinery and Intelligence, Turing asked, “Can machines think?”

The last work of John von Neumann was a lecture series: The Computer and the Brain, published posthumously in 1958. In it von Neumann explains that it is not that the brain acts like a computer, but that computers are so varied in what they can do, that they can be set up to imitate any machine — presumably even the human brain.

The important result of Turing’s is that in this way the first [universal] machine can be caused to imitate the behavior of any other machine.

John von Neumann in “The Computer and the Brain” (1958)

In the 1960s and 1970s, philosophers of mind including Hilary Putnam and his student Jerry Fodor developed what they called functionalism. In its digital form, functionalism is known as the Computational Theory of Mind (or computationalism). This is the idea that function, or computation, is the foundation of consciousness.

The computational theory of mind remains as the most popular theory for consciousness among scientists and philosophers.

Computationalism, or digital mechanism, or simply mechanism, is [a] hypothesis in the cognitive science according to which we can be emulated by a computer without changing our private subjective feeling.

Bruno Marchal in “The computationalist reformulation of the mind-body problem” (2013)

If the computational theory of mind is true, then mathematics can explain where observers come from. Observers would be found among the infinite computational histories within arithmetical truth. (See: “What is consciousness?” and “Can a machine be conscious?“)

Recent discoveries in physics lend support to computationalism.

In 1981, Jacob Bekenstein discovered a physical limit now known as the Bekenstein bound. This bound says that a physical system of finite mass and volume can contain, at most, a finite amount of information. This applies to any finite physical system: a brain, the Earth, the Solar System, our galaxy, or the observable universe.

Given that the observable universe has a finite mass and volume, it follows by the Bekenstein bound that it has a finite description.

Given that it has a finite description, it follows by the Church-Turing thesis that the evolution of the observable universe is something that is perfectly replicated by a certain computer program.

This program contains a version of you, me, the Earth and everyone and everything present in our universe. Our shared histories and memories would be identical. But the question remains: are these computational doppelgängers conscious like we are?

If we inspected the contents of this computer program, we would find analogues of all the objects of our own universe. We would find the same books, articles, and movies. Among these we would even find many works on the mysterious nature of consciousness.

Here are books on consciousness found in our observable universe. These same books will also appear in a purely computational version of our universe – written by computational authors – who apparently are just as baffled by their conscious experiences as we are.
Here are books on consciousness found in our observable universe. These same books will also appear in a purely computational version of our universe — written by computational authors — who apparently are just as baffled by their conscious experiences as we are.

If these purely computational versions of us are not conscious, what drives them to write and read books about consciousness?

If, on the other hand, they are just as conscious as we are, then the idea of a separately existing physical reality becomes redundant. In that case, for all we know, we are these computational versions!

We would then exist as pure computations. We would inhabit the computational histories of simulated realities that exist only as a consequence of mathematical truth concerning universal equations.

Every imaginable computation is realized in arithmetic as true relations about these universal equations. This includes the computations that describe you, your environment, and even the evolving state of your brain as it processes this very sentence.

If computationalism is right, this is who we are.

We’ll explore the fascinating relations between computation, mathematics, physics and mind, and explore a crazy-sounding belief of mine that our physical world not only is described by mathematics, but that it is mathematics, making us self-aware parts of a giant mathematical object.

Max Tegmark in “Our Mathematical Universe” (2014)
The Cause of Matter

Can mathematical truth, with its inherent infinite collection of computational histories, explain matter, physical laws and universes?

Concretely existing things. Bricks, stones, houses, matter, planets, universes.
Concretely existing things. Bricks, stones, houses, matter, planets, universes.

How can abstract things, like truth, numbers, computations, give rise to concrete things like chairs, bricks, and houses?

What’s the difference between abstract existence vs. concrete existence?

Some say the difference is only a matter of perspective. To a being who inhabits an abstract object, (be it an abstract mathematical object or abstractly existing computation), it seems concrete to them.

This equivalence between physical and mathematical existence means that if a mathematical structure contains a [self-aware substructure], it will perceive itself as existing in a physically real world, just as we do.

Max Tegmark in “The Mathematical Universe” (2007)

The relative aspect of concrete existence, is explicit in Markus Müller’s definition of physical existence:

Given two objects A and B, we say that they [physically exist] for each other if and only if, under certain auxiliary conditions, modifying the state of A will affect the state of B, and vice versa.

Markus Müller in “Could the physical world be emergent instead of fundamental, and why should we ask?” (2017)

Whenever a conscious observer experiences or interacts with another object, that object appears concrete to that observer — even if, from another point of view, both that observer and object seem abstract.

Of the modes of existence, this understanding implies mind over matter.

Math produces an infinity of conscious minds, and the perceptions of these minds include experiences of material realities.

It is not matter that produces mind and mind that produces math, but the reverse.

Computationalism, together with the mathematical existence of all computations, leads to a causal reversal between mind and matter.

What results is not a primitive matter with consciousness emerging from its organisation but the reverse: consciousness is now the more primitive and matter, or rather the appearance of material organisation, emerges from all the possible experiences of all the possible consciousnesses.

Bruno Marchal in “The Amoeba’s Secret” (2014)

Matter is then, as Plotinus supposed, a phantasm.

Is This Testable?

This is a big pill to swallow. Are we to take as serious the idea that we live inside an equation? And this equation somehow produces all computations by virtue of its solutions? And that the whole physical universe is just some kind of shared hallucination?

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

Unless there is a way to test and either confirm or falsify this theory, we are not operating in the realm of science, but fantasy.

Fortunately, there is a way to test this theory.

Due to the fact that not all programs appear with equal frequency, a particular bias should appear in the resulting computational histories.

We can then check for this bias by comparing our observations of the character of physical law and the properties of our universe against the predictions made by the theory.

Not all predictions of a theory are necessarily testable, but the more predictions of a theory we test and confirm, the more our confidence in that theory grows.

If our observations match the predictions, we gain evidence in support of the theory. If they don’t match, we rule the theory out.

This is how all theories are tested.

Algorithmic Information Theory

The reason not all programs occur with equal frequency is due to a consequence of algorithmic information theory (or AIT).

This field was developed by Ray Solomonoff, Andrey Kolmogorov and Gregory Chaitin, starting in the 1960s.

Chaitin says, “AIT is the result of putting Shannon’s information theory and Turing’s computability theory into a cocktail shaker and shaking vigorously. The basic idea is to measure the complexity of an object by the size in bits of the smallest program for computing it.”

Across the infinite programs executed by universal equations, some programs exhibit identical behavior. This is because the program’s code may instruct it to read only a fraction of its total available code.

Above we see bit-strings representing programs executed by universal equations. The bold digits represent bits read by the program. Highlighted in blue, are two different bit strings, which nonetheless result in identical program behavior, since the bits read are identical.

Programs that complete are naturally self-delimiting. They define their own length by virtue of reading only a finite number of bits.

Above we see two equivalent programs highlighted in blue, both of these programs are defined by the same 9-bit prefix.

Given that this program length is 9 bits, we can calculate that this program should appear once every 2^{9} (or 512) bit strings. Self-delimited 10-bit programs would be half as common, appearing once every 2^{10} (or 1,024) programs. Conversely, 8-bit programs are twice as common as 9-bit ones.

We can use this consequence of algorithmic information theory to make several predictions about the character of physical law.

The main point is that the derivation is constructive, and it provides the technical means to derive physics from arithmetic, and this will make the computationalist hypothesis empirically testable, and thus scientific in the Popperian analysis of science.

Bruno Marchal in “The computationalist reformulation of the mind-body problem” (2013)

Confirming Evidence

Could such a bold theory be true?

For now, let’s neither accept nor reject this theory. To do either before weighing the evidence would be premature.

So let us not believe anything and maintain an open mind. For the time, we will only play with the idea and see where it leads.

As with any theory, the only path forward is to see what this theory predicts and then to compare the predictions with our observations.

If we find it leads in a fruitful direction, by making predictions we can confirm and by not making predictions we can refute, then we will have cause to tentatively accept this theory.

Predictions of the Theory

Does the reality we see fit predictions of a reality generated by the infinite computations inherent to causeless arithmetical truth?

For that matter, what are the predictions?

At first blush, it seems impossible to get any useful predictions from a theory that includes all computations and all observations. For if they all exist, any observation is compatible with the theory. As Victor Stenger noted, “Theories that explain everything explain nothing.”

Fortunately, there is a catch: not all observations are equally likely.

If our conscious states result from the existence of all computations, then they are subject to the rules of algorithmic information theory.

This enables us to make testable predictions, and thereby tie it back to hard science, observation, and measurement.

Some of the predictions of this theory provide clues to otherwise unsolvable questions in physics and cosmogeny. These predictions offer answers to such fundamental mysteries as:

These results are the work of pioneers in the theory, who include Bruno Marchal, Max Tegmark, Russell Standish, and Markus Müller.

Using the tools of computer science, math, information theory, and algorithmic information theory, they revealed how these traits of the universe result from our mind states being computationally-generated.

The appearance of a universe, or even universes, must be explained by the geometry of possible computations.

Bruno Marchal in “The Amoeba’s Secret” (2014)

Let’s review the evidence for this most speculative of theories, which is presently at the forefront of mathematics and physics.

Why Laws?

We take for granted that our universe obeys laws. But why should it?

What’s the source of these laws? Why are they so simple? Why aren’t they ever violated? Why these laws and not others?

All these questions are mysteries left unaddressed by science.

In the orthodox view, the laws of physics are floating in an explanatory void. Ironically, the essence of the scientific method is rationality and logic: we suppose that things are the way they are for a reason. Yet when it comes to the laws of physics themselves, well, we are asked to accept that they exist “reasonlessly”.

Paul Davies in “The flexi-laws of physics” (2007)

With the equations, when they are not too complicated, we can predict phenomena. But in truth, the equation doesn’t explain anything. It compresses, certainly, in a very ingenious way, the description of the physical world, but it does not explain the nature of bodies nor why these bodies obey laws, nor from where these laws come.

Bruno Marchal in “The Amoeba’s Secret” (2014)

That laws are never violated, on its face, seems highly improbable. For in the space of possibility, for each way there is for the universe to obey the laws, there are infinite ways it might deviate from them.

For each law-governed world, there are countless variants that would fail in different ways to be wholly law-governed.

Derek Parfit in “Why Anything? Why This?” (2008)

Why the laws hold is unknown to science. And yet, this feature of reality is the very basis that allows us to do science.

Without consistent laws, experimental outcomes can't be reproduced or predicted.
Without consistent laws, experimental outcomes can’t be reproduced or predicted.

A lawful universe is the basis of empiricism. It is why we can repeat experiments, and make predictions about the future based on past observations. But why does this work, and why should it work?

Marchal explains the emergence of laws as a consequence of the computational reality. He says the laws are the ‘consistent extensions’ of programs that produce the observer’s mind state.

Arithmetic contains or executes all computations. Your first person is distributed on all computations going through your current first person state. To make any prediction on the future of your possible inputs, you need to take all the computations into account, and the laws of physics is what is invariant in all consistent extensions.

Bruno Marchal in discussion list (2019)

Müller goes further, and gives a mathematical proof that shows why, given algorithmic information theory, observers will, with high probability, observe a ‘persistence of regularities‘ (i.e. laws).

That is, computable regularities that were holding in the past tend to persist in the future. […]

Intuitively, highly compressible histories are those that contain regularities which can be used to generate shorter descriptions.

Markus Müller in “Law without law: from observer states to physics via algorithmic information theory” (2020)

Because most programs are simple, and simple programs tend to keep doing what they have been doing, this gives the appearance of a fixed set of laws that holds into the future as the program unfolds.

So in a sense, the laws of physics are the rules of the programs that instantiate us, as seen by those of us inside those programs.

Why the Laws are Mathematical

It has long been recognized that mathematics is “unreasonably effective” in describing the physical laws. In 1623, Galileo wrote, “[The universe] is written in the language of mathematics.”

This connection between math and physics still puzzles scientists.

The miracle of the appropriateness of the language of mathematics for the formulation of the laws of physics is a wonderful gift which we neither understand nor deserve. We should be grateful for it and hope that it will remain valid in future research and that it will extend, for better or for worse, to our pleasure, even though perhaps also to our bafflement, to wide branches of learning.

Eugene Wigner in “The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences (1960)
Mathematical patterns appear everywhere in nature.
Mathematical patterns appear everywhere in nature.

But why should physics be so mathematical? Tegmark offers a simple explanation: because physical theories result from our perceptions of what are ultimately mathematical structures.

The various approximations that constitute our current physics theories are successful because simple mathematical structures can provide good approximations of how a [self-aware substructure] will perceive more complex mathematical structures. In other words, our successful theories are not mathematics approximating physics, but mathematics approximating mathematics!

Max Tegmark in “Is ‘the theory of everything’ merely the ultimate ensemble theory?” (1998)
Why the Laws are Simple

In the 2nd century, Ptolemy wrote, “We consider it a good principle to explain the phenomena by the simplest hypothesis possible.”

This rule of thumb is called the law of parsimony or Occam’s razor.

It is the idea that in science, the simplest answer that fits the facts is usually right. Occam’s razor is no doubt a useful and effective rule, but until recently no one understood why it works.

A few of the great equations in physics. What is striking is their simplicity.
A few of the great equations in physics. What is striking is their simplicity.

Deep truths of nature can be expressed by short formulas, like F = ma and E = mc2. Physical equations rarely involve more than a few terms, rather than dozens or hundreds.

Physicists are awestruck by this simplicity. Einstein remarked, “The eternal mystery of the world is its comprehensibility.”

Given there are far more ways for these formulas to be more complex, it’s especially odd that they should be so simple.

Compared with simple laws, there is a far greater range of complicated laws. […] We would have some reason to believe that there are at least two partial Selectors: being law-governed and having simple laws.

Derek Parfit in “Why Anything? Why This?” (2008)

But the lesson is that at present the idea that the ultimate laws are as simple as possible is a hope, not something suggested by the evidence. Moreover, the prospect still faces the challenge of explanatory regression, as one would [be] left to explain why the underlying laws should be so simple.

Sean Carroll in “Why Is There Something, Rather Than Nothing?” (2018)

The mystery of simple comprehensible laws can now be answered.

We have found a selector that preferentially selects universes with simple laws. Algorithmic information theory tells us that for each bit saved in a program’s description, its occurrences double.

This adds up fast. A program that’s 30 bits shorter, say 120-bits vs. 150-bits occurs 2^{30}or over 1 billion — times more often.

Ray Solomonoff, the father of algorithmic information theory, was the first to draw a connection between AIT and Occam’s razor.

On a direct intuitive level, the high a priori probability assigned to a sequence with a short description corresponds to one possible interpretation of “Occam’s Razor.”

Ray Solomonoff in “A Formal Theory of Inductive Inference” (1964)

When Müller applied algorithmic information theory to observer states, he found that it led to the prediction of simple physical laws.

Observers will, with high probability, see an external world that is governed by simple, computable, probabilistic laws.

Markus Müller in “Law without law: from observer states to physics via algorithmic information theory” (2020)
Why the Laws are Life-Friendly

One of the most surprising discoveries in physics of the past 50 years was the discovery that the laws of physics and constants of nature appear specially selected to allow complexity and life to arise.

Wheeler wrote, “A life-giving factor lies at the centre of the whole machinery and design of the world.”

Why are the laws of physics suited to the emergence of complexity and life?
Why are the laws of physics suited to the emergence of complexity and life?

That the constants of nature, the strengths of the forces, the particle masses, etc., are just right to permit complex structures to arise is mysterious. Why are the laws this way? Why are they life friendly?

Physicists ask, why does the universe appear fine-tuned?

As we look out into the universe and identify the many accidents of physics and astronomy that have worked together to our benefit, it almost seems as if the universe must in some sense have known we were coming.

Freeman Dyson in “Energy in the Universe” (1971)

The fine tunings, how fine-tuned are they? Most of them are 1% sort of things. In other words, if things are 1% different, everything gets bad. And the physicist could say maybe those are just luck. On the other hand, this cosmological constant is tuned to one part in 10^{120} — a hundred and twenty decimal places. Nobody thinks that’s accidental. That is not a reasonable idea — that something is tuned to 120 decimal places just by accident. That’s the most extreme example of fine-tuning.

Leonard Susskind in “What We Still Don’t Know: Are We Real?” (2004)

The first step in explaining fine-tuning is to recognize that for any universe to be perceived, requires that it be populated with conscious observers. This reasoning is known as the anthropic principle.

The next step is to explain why any universe exists that supports conscious observers. Typical answers are that the universe was either designed or it is just one among a vast set of mostly dead universes.

We imagine our universe to be unique, but it is one of an immense number—perhaps an infinite number—of equally valid, equally independent, equally isolated universes. There will be life in some, and not in others.

Carl Sagan in “Pale Blue Dot” (1994)

The existence of infinite computational histories, guarantees that some will be of a type that can support life. Moreover, algorithmic information theory tells us the resulting physics should be maximally simple while respecting the constraint of being life-friendly.

In this paper I show why, in an ensemble theory of the universe, we should be inhabiting one of the elements of that ensemble with least information content that satisfies the anthropic principle. This explains the effectiveness of aesthetic principles such as Occam’s razor in predicting usefulness of scientific theories.

Russell Standish in “Why Occam’s Razor” (2004)

And indeed, this is what we find when we examine our physics:

A very interesting question to me is: is the universe more complicated than it needs to be to have us here? In other words, is there anything in the universe which is just here to amuse physicists?

It’s happened again and again that there was something which seemed like it was just a frivolity like that, where later we’ve realized that in fact, “No, if it weren’t for that little thing we wouldn’t be here.”

I’m not convinced actually that we have anything in this universe which is completely unnecessary to life.

Max Tegmark in “What We Still Don’t Know: Why Are We Here” (2004)

(See: “Is the universe fine-tuned?“)

Why Quantum Mechanics?

Quantum mechanics is a cornerstone theory of modern physics. It’s among the most thoroughly tested of all theories in science, and it’s given us the most accurate predictions in all of physics.

But quantum mechanics is incredibly strange.

It suggests the existence of many (infinite) histories (i.e. many-worlds or many-minds). Observation or measurement appears to cause the infinite set of possibilities to “collapse” to just one of the possibilities, and the selected result is absolutely unpredictable.

According to quantum mechanics, no one can predict whether a photon will be reflected by or transmitted through a piece of glass, not even in principle. It's fundamentally random.
According to quantum mechanics, no one can predict whether a photon will be reflected by or transmitted through a piece of glass, not even in principle. It’s fundamentally random. Image Credit: Wikipedia

Quantum mechanics includes apparent absurdities, like unobserved cats being simultaneously alive and dead, non-local faster-than-light influences, and unlimited computation underlying physical reality.

I have never been able to let go of questions like: How come existence? How come the quantum?

John Archibald Wheeler in “Geons, Black Holes, and Quantum Foam” (1998)

Of the mysteries in physics, “How come the quantum?“, ranks highly:

Niels Bohr said, “Those who are not shocked when they first come across quantum theory cannot possibly have understood it.” Werner Heisenberg admits, “I repeated to myself again and again the question: Can nature possibly be so absurd as it seemed to us in these atomic experiments?” And Richard Feynman said, “I think I can safely say that nobody understands quantum mechanics.”

Wheeler thought if an ultimate theory could explain quantum mechanics, it would be a sure sign the theory was on the right track.

The most important test is whether it gives anything like quantum mechanics. If it does, we have a go-ahead sign, if not, we have to revise our thinking.

John Archibald Wheeler quoted in “Trespassing on Einstein’s Lawn” (2014)

Marchal’s 1998 thesis, Computability, Physics and Cognition, gave the first hints that features of quantum mechanics, such as indeterminism, the many parallel histories, the non-clonability of matter, and quantum logic, could be explained as a consequence of computationalism.

As in quantum mechanics, computationalism highlights a strong indeterminism, as well as a form of non-locality. […] Computationalism entails the existence of a phenomenology of many-worlds or parallel states.

Bruno Marchal translated from “Computability, Physics and Cognition” (1998)

Marchal writes, “The quantum empirical clues happen to be serious hints that the physical emerges from an internally defined statistics on the numbers dreams or computations seen from inside.”

Standish went further. In a 2004 paper and in his 2006 book, he showed one could derive the basic rules, or postulates, of quantum mechanics, including the Schrödinger equation, purely from basic assumptions about observation within an infinite set of possibilities.

The explanation of quantum mechanics as describing the process of observation within a plenitude of possibilities is for me the pinnacle of achievement of the paradigm discussed in this book. I can now say that I understand quantum mechanics. […]

So when I say I understand quantum mechanics, I mean that I know that the first three postulates are directly consequences of us being observers. Quantum mechanics is simply a theory of observation!

Russell Standish in “Theory of Nothing” (2006)
Irreducible Randomness

One of the strangest features of quantum mechanics is the presence of irreducible randomness that creates absolute unpredictability.

Compounding this strangeness is the fact that the equations of quantum mechanics are entirely deterministic. And yet, when a measurement is made, it seems the universe momentarily stops following these equations to randomly select one possibility to make real, from among the many possibilities present in the equations.

This was a pill too hard for Einstein to swallow. He declared, “God doesn’t play dice with the world.” And in the end he never accepted it.

In the single-electron double-slit experiment, an electron is put into a superposition — where the electron exists in multiple locations at once.

Then it’s location is measured.

But when we measure the electron’s location, it will appear in only one location, seemingly at random. Before measurement, it’s impossible, even in theory, to predict where the electron will be.

If we inhabit a computational reality why do we see any randomness or unpredictability? Computations are perfectly predictable. Might this observation of randomness give us cause to doubt or rule out our being in a computational reality?

The opposite is true. The existence of an infinite computational reality explains why we encounter absolute unpredictability.

If only one computational history existed, observing randomness would be cause to dismiss the theory. But here there are infinite computational histories. Some of these histories will be similar to each other, some, so similar as to be almost indistinguishable.

Since there are infinite computational histories, each observer’s mind state can be found within infinite parallel computational histories.

In a 1988 conference and in a 1991 paper, Mechanism and Personal Identity, Marchal explained how the appearance of randomness emerges from multiple instantiations of a single observer’s mind.

He calls the phenomenon first-person indeterminacy.

To predict the first person observable outcome of any physical experiment, you have to assume that your current computational state will not be obtained in some other part of the universe, or the multiverse, with different output for your experience.

Bruno Marchal in “The computationalist reformulation of the mind-body problem” (2013)

In summary: no brain that belongs to multiple distinct universes, or computational histories, can ever be sure what it will see next.

Multiple parallel histories contain identical instances of the same observer's mind state (or brain). A fundamental unpredictability and randomness will result from the observer's inability to determine which universe she's a part of, as she exists in all of them.
Multiple parallel histories contain identical instances of the same observer’s mind state (or brain). A fundamental unpredictability and randomness will result from the observer’s inability to determine which universe she’s a part of, as she exists in all of them.

It is impossible for any observer to deduce with certainty on the basis of her observations and memory which world she is a part of. That is, there are always many different worlds for which being contained in them is compatible with everything she knows, but which imply different predictions for future observations.

Markus Müller in “Could the physical world be emergent instead of fundamental, and why should we ask?” (2017)

So even in a fully deterministic reality, the existence of infinite histories makes the appearance of randomness inevitable.

The physicist shining a photon at a piece of glass is in an infinity of histories where the photon will reflect, and is in an infinity of histories where the photon will pass through. The physicist can’t tell which until after the experiment is performed and she learns the result.

Ultimately, randomness stems from our inability to self-locate within the infinite sea of indistinguishable computational histories.

Tegmark notes how randomness appears in deterministic processes:

It gradually hit me that this illusion of randomness business really wasn’t specific to quantum mechanics at all. Suppose that some future technology allows you to be cloned while you’re sleeping, and that your two copies are placed in rooms numbered 0 and 1. When they wake up, they’ll both feel that the room number they read is completely unpredictable and random.

Max Tegmark in “Our Mathematical Universe” (2014)

Einstein is vindicated. God doesn’t play dice with the world. But perhaps, not even God can predict what universe you will find yourself in once you perform a measurement that splits yourself.

(See: “Does everything that can happen, actually happen?“)

Infinite Complexity

In 1948, Richard Feynman developed the path integral formulation, which provided a new way to understand quantum mechanics.

Feynman showed that you get the same results quantum mechanics predicts by taking into account and adding up every one of the infinite combinations of possible particle paths and interactions.

It was bizarre, but it worked. And this new formulation provided key insights that helped develop quantum electrodynamics (or QED). In 1965, Feynman, together with Sin-Itiro Tomonaga and Julian Schwinger shared the 1965 Nobel Prize in physics for developing QED.

But why adding up all of these infinite possibilities gave the right answers presented a great puzzle, which bothered Feynman.

It always bothers me that, according to the laws as we understand them today, it takes a computing machine an infinite number of logical operations to figure out what goes on in no matter how tiny a region of space, and no matter how tiny a region of time. How can all that be going on in that tiny space? Why should it take an infinite amount of logic to figure out what one tiny piece of space/time is going to do?

Richard Feynman in “The Character of Physical Law” (1965)
Under quantum mechanics, an infinite number of things happen behind the scenes. The smaller the scales you look, the more seems to be happening, with no bottom in sight.

The appearance of infinite happenings, infinite computations and infinite logical operations underlying physical reality is mysterious.

Perhaps the simplest answer for why reality appears this way is, “It appears this way because that is the way reality is.”

If infinite computational histories form the foundation of reality, then infinities in physics might just be a reflection of this reality.

In short, within each universe all observable quantities are discrete, but the multiverse as a whole is a continuum. When the equations of quantum theory describe a continuous but not-directly-observable transition between two values of a discrete quantity, what they are telling us is that the transition does not take place entirely within one universe. So perhaps the price of continuous motion is not an infinity of consecutive actions, but an infinity of concurrent actions taking place across the multiverse.

David Deutsch in “The Discrete and the Continuous” (2001)

Matter is only what seems to emerge at infinity from a first person plural point of view (defined by sharing the computations which are infinitely multiplied in the [Universal Dovetailer’s] work) when persons look at themselves and their environment below their substitution level. The non-cloning results from the fact that such a matter emerges only from an infinity of distinct computations.

Bruno Marchal in “The computationalist reformulation of the mind-body problem” (2013)
Quantum Computers

Richard Feynman and David Deutsch are the two fathers of the quantum computer. Feynman proposed their possibility in 1982 and in 1985, Deutsch described how to build one.

These computers exploit the unlimited complexity inherent in quantum mechanics to build computers of incredible power.

How quantum computers do what they do is puzzling.

Each qubit added to a quantum computer doubles its power. A quantum computer with 300 qubits can simultaneously process 2^{300} states. This number of states exceeds the 2^{265} atoms in the observable universe.

How could a tabletop device process more states than there are atoms? How could it solve problems that no conventional computer could solve in the lifetime of the universe, even if all matter and energy in the observable universe were recruited for that purpose?

Some found the abilities of these computers so incredible, they concluded quantum computers simply weren’t possible. After all, where exactly would all that computation be occurring?

Deutsch and Tegmark offer some answers.

Since the Universe as we see it lacks the computational resources to do the calculations, where are they being done? It can only be in other universes. Quantum computers share information with huge numbers of versions of themselves throughout the multiverse.

David Deutsch in “Taming the Multiverse” (2001)

Given engineering challenges, for decades quantum computers remained only theoretical. Today, quantum computers are a reality.

In 2019, engineers at Google reported that their 53-qubit quantum computer solved in 200 seconds a problem that would take the world’s most powerful supercomputer 10,000 years.

Quantum computers speed up computations by exploiting the parallelism of the multiverse. Image Credit: IBM Research
Quantum computers speed up computations by exploiting the parallelism of the multiverse. Image Credit: IBM Research

Today, anyone can sign up for free to program and use IBM’s quantum computers over the internet.

What makes quantum computers difficult to build, is that to work, they must be completely isolated from the environment — such that they are not measured by anyone or anything until it finishes its work.

By isolating the quantum computer from the environment, observers temporarily make their existence compatible with all the possible states the quantum computer might simultaneously be in.

The parallel computations performed by quantum computers can then be explained by the work of parallel computational histories.

If current efforts to build quantum computers succeed, they will provide further evidence for [the quantum multiverse], as they would, in essence, be exploiting the parallelism of the [quantum] multiverse for parallel computation.

Max Tegmark in “Parallel Universes” (2003)

(See: “How do quantum computers work?“)

Why Time?

The universe, our lives, and even our thoughts are inextricably linked with the march of time. Few things are as familiar to us as time, and yet time remains little understood. (See: “What is time?“)

2,500 years ago, Heraclitus recognized change to be the only constant in life, saying, “All entities move and nothing remains still.” But it doesn’t seem logically necessary for a universe to have time.

Mathematical structures are eternal and unchanging: they don’t exist in space and time—rather, space and time exist in (some of) them. If cosmic history were a movie, then the mathematical structure would be the entire DVD.

Max Tegmark in “Our Mathematical Universe” (2014)

Why should our universe have a property like time?

The mystery of time captures our imaginations. Here Salvador Dalí depicts clocks melting in "The Persistence of Memory" (1931)
The mysterious nature of time captures our imaginations. Salvador Dalí depicts clocks melting in “The Persistence of Memory” (1931)

All computers process information in an ordered sequence of steps. This ordering defines a notion of time that exists for any computation.

A Turing machine requires time to separate the sequence of states it occupies as it performs a computation.

Russell Standish in “Why Occam’s Razor” (2004)

Müller further showed that with algorithmic information theory, we can predict the appearance of a universe that evolves in time.

Our theory predicts that observers should indeed expect to see two facts which are features of our physics as we know it: first, the fact that the observer seems to be part of an external world that evolves in time (a ‘universe’), and second, that this external world seems to have had an absolute beginning in the past (the ‘Big Bang’).

Markus Müller in “Could the physical world be emergent instead of fundamental, and why should we ask?” (2017)

Assuming we are part of an unfolding computation, then we should expect to find ourselves in a universe with time.

A Beginning in Time

Current evidence suggests our universe has a beginning.

But why should it?

Until the middle of the 20th century, most scientists believed the universe was infinitely old, without a beginning. They considered theories of an abrupt creation event to be inelegant.

Accordingly, scientists resisted the idea of a beginning until overwhelming evidence came out in its favor. It wasn’t until we could actually see the afterglow of the big bang, in the form of microwaves, that scientists were convinced the universe began a finite time ago.

The history of the universe, as presently understood. Image Credit: NASA.
The history of the universe began some 13.8 billion years ago. Image Credit: NASA.

We call this point the beginning because in tracing the history of the universe backwards, we hit a point where predicting earlier states breaks down and further backwards tracing becomes impossible.

The physics either stops providing sensible answers, or we run into an explosion of possibilities and can’t tell which of them is real.

The theory of cosmic inflation, gives an account of what caused the hot, dense, early phase of the universe. (See: “What caused the big bang?“)

But inflation makes further backwards prediction (or retrodiction) impossible. It wipes its footprints with a set of infinite prehistories.

Since our own pocket universe would be equally likely to lie anywhere on the infinite tree of universes produced by eternal inflation, we would expect to find ourselves arbitrarily far from the beginning. The infinite inflating network would presumably approach some kind of a steady state, losing all memory of how it started, so the statistical predictions for our universe would be determined by the properties of this steady state configuration, independent of hypotheses about the ultimate beginning.

Alan Guth in “Eternal Inflation: Implications” (2013)

Müller shows that algorithmic information theory predicts most observers will find themselves in a universe with simple initial conditions and an absolute beginning in time.

He explains this reasoning for a hypothetical observer named Abby:

If she continues computing backwards to retrodict earlier and earlier states of her universe, she will typically find simpler and more “compact” states, with measures of entropy or algorithmic complexity decreasing — simply because she is looking at earlier and earlier stages of an unfolding computation.

At some point, Abby will necessarily arrive at the state that corresponds to the initial state of the graph machine’s computation, where simplicity and compactness are maximal. At this point, two cases are possible: either Abby’s method of computing backwards will cease to work; or Abby will retrodict a fictitious sequence of ‘states before the initial state’, typically with increasing complexity backwards in time.

Markus Müller in “Law without law: from observer states to physics via algorithmic information theory” (2018)

This mirrors what cosmic inflation does for our universe.

In an alternate history where humans developed algorithmic information theory before microwave telescopes, we might have predicted a beginning of the universe before telescopic evidence came in.

Information as Fundamental

Physicists are increasingly recognizing that information plays a fundamental role in physics.

Scientists have long understood that matter and energy can be neither created nor destroyed. They are, in all interactions, conserved.

But only recently have physicists realized the same is true for information. Physical information can neither be copied nor deleted. There is an equivalent law for the conservation of information.

This discovery stemmed from the black hole information paradox.

The supermassive black hole at the center of Galaxy M87. Image Credit: Event Horizon Telescope
The supermassive black hole at the center of Galaxy M87. Image Credit: Event Horizon Telescope

According to general relativity, dropping something into a black hole destroys its information, like an ultimate furnace. But according to quantum mechanics, information can’t be destroyed. At best, a black hole can only rearrange information, like an ultimate shredder.

In 1981, this paradox sparked the “black hole war” — waged by two camps of physicists. After decades of debate, the black hole war settled in favor of quantum mechanics.

Information can’t be destroyed, not even by a black hole. Physicists now understand a kind of mass-energy-information equivalence.

There is also an equivalence between entropy in thermodynamics and entropy in information theory. And constants of nature are closely linked to the ultimate physical limits of computational speed, efficiency and storage density. (See: “How good can technology get?“)

Why is the link between physics and information so tight?

Wheeler dedicated his life to the pursuit of fundamental questions. Ultimately, he reached the conclusion that everything is information.

It from bit symbolizes the idea that every item of the physical world has at bottom — a very deep bottom, in most instances — an immaterial source and explanation; that which we call reality arises in the last analysis from the posing of yes-no questions and the registering of equipment-evoked responses; in short, that all things physical are information-theoretic in origin.

John Archibald Wheeler in “Information, Physics, Quantum: The Search for Links” (1989)

Now I am in the grip of a new vision, that Everything is Information. The more I have pondered the mystery of the quantum and our strange ability to comprehend this world in which we live, the more I see possible fundamental roles for logic and information as the bedrock of physical theory.

John Archibald Wheeler in “Geons, Black Holes, and Quantum Foam” (1998)
Does information somehow form the bedrock of reality?
Does information somehow form the bedrock of reality?

Why is information fundamental? The answer is easy if reality is computational. Information lies at the heart of computation.

In the end, all that computers do is process information. So to say, “computation is the foundation of reality,” is another way of saying, “information processing is the foundation of reality.”

The burgeoning field of computer science has shifted our view of the physical world from that of a collection of interacting material particles to one of a seething network of information.

Paul Davies in “The flexi-laws of physics” (2007)

What we can learn from these reconstructions is that a few simple and intuitive constraints on encoding and processing of information will automatically lead to (aspects of) the Hilbert space formalism of quantum theory.

Markus Müller in “Law without law: from observer states to physics via algorithmic information theory” (2019)

Observation as Fundamental

Observation also appears to have a fundamental role in reality.

The universe and the observer exist as a pair. […] The moment you say that the universe exists without any observers, I cannot make any sense out of that. You need an observer who looks at the universe. In the absence of observers, our universe is dead.

Andre Linde in “Does the Universe Exist if We’re Not Looking?” (2002)

Quantum mechanics revealed that observation somehow forces reality to choose from among many possibilities.

More recently, physicists have speculated that the observer’s power to force reality’s hand applies not only to the here and now, but perhaps all the way back to the beginning of the universe.

We are participators in bringing into being not only the near and here but the far away and long ago. We are in this sense, participators in bringing about something of the universe in the distant past.

John Archibald Wheeler in “The anthropic universe” (2006)

The top down approach we have described leads to a profoundly different view of cosmology, and the relation between cause and effect. Top down cosmology is a framework in which one essentially traces the histories backwards, from a spacelike surface at the present time. The no boundary histories of the universe thus depend on what is being observed, contrary to the usual idea that the universe has a unique, observer independent history. In some sense no boundary initial conditions represent a sum over all possible initial states.

Stephen Hawking and Thomas Hertog in “Populating the landscape: A top-down approach” (2006)

The observer might even, in some sense, choose the laws of physics.

It is an attempt to explain the Goldilocks factor by appealing to cosmic self-consistency: the bio-friendly universe explains life even as life explains the bio-friendly universe. […] Cosmic bio-friendliness is therefore the result of a sort of quantum post-selection effect extended to the very laws of physics themselves.

Paul Davies in “The flexi-laws of physics” (2007)
Can there be a universe if there is no one to call it home? Do observations themselves somehow define the histories and laws of the universes containing them?

Observation and its relation to observed reality is an enigma.

Wheeler believed the relation between them was our best clue to finding an answer to why there is something rather than nothing.

« Omnibus ex nihil ducendis sufficit unum », Leibniz told us; for producing everything out of nothing one principle is enough. Of all principles that might meet this requirement of Leibniz nothing stands out more strikingly in this era of the quantum than the necessity to draw a line between the observer-participator and the system under view. […] The necessity for that line of separation is the most mysterious feature of the quantum. We take that demarcation as being, if not the central principle, the clue to the central principle in constructing out of nothing everything.

John Archibald Wheeler in “Quantum Theory and Measurement” (1983)

In the view that all computational histories exist, observation does play a role in selecting both histories and physical laws.

It is a tautology that observers only find themselves in computational histories capable of producing their observations.

Since every imaginable program exists, implementing every imaginable set of laws, then in a very real sense, the observer does force reality to select both the laws and history they observe.

To derive the effective laws of physics, one needs to do statistics over the ensemble of identical observers. This involves performing summations over the multiverse, but these summations are with a constraint that says that some given observer is present.

Saibal Mitra in discussion list (2018)

It’s curious that Buddhist thinkers reached similar conclusions about observers well ahead of modern physicists.

The Buddhist does not believe in an independent or separately existing external world, into whose dynamic forces he could insert himself. The external world and his inner world are for him only two sides of the same fabric, in which the threads of all forces and of all events, of all forms of consciousness and their objects, are woven into an inseparable net of endless, mutually conditioned relations.

Anagarika Govinda in “Foundations of Tibetan Mysticism” (1969)

Reviewing the Evidence

We have found evidence in support of this theory. The existence of infinite computational histories predicts many features of reality.

It predicts a universe of inviolable, but simple, mathematical, and life-friendly laws. It predicts a multiverse of parallel histories, infinite computational complexity, and a fundamental unpredictability, as we find in quantum mechanics.

The theory predicts a universe that evolves in time, has simple initial conditions, and a point that we can’t retrodict beyond: a beginning. Further, it predicts information and observation are fundamental.

So far, all of these predictions are confirmed by current physical and cosmological observations. For the first time in history, humanity has an answer to why we exist that is backed by physical evidence.

Conclusions

Given the observational evidence, we have reason to suspect that this theory, or something close to it, is correct.

It implies: We live within the total set of all computations.

Moreover, we have traced the existence of this set to something that’s a strong candidate for having necessary existence: self-existent truths concerning numbers and their relations.

One option, following Leibniz and others, is that we reach a level at which further explanation is not required, because something is necessarily true.

Sean Carroll in “Why Is There Something, Rather Than Nothing?” (2018)

This truth not only seems causeless, but because from it we can deduce much of physics, it is also a candidate for being the cause.

The supreme task of the physicist is the discovery of the most general elementary laws from which the world-picture can be deduced logically.

Max Planck in “Where is science going?” (1932)

Under this theory, the most general laws from which we can deduce the world-picture become the laws of arithmetic. Thus, arithmetic, as a theory of arithmetical truth, becomes a theory of everything.

This brings a whole new meaning to Leopold Kronecker’s edict: “God made the integers, all else is the work of man.”

This is why, with Church’s thesis, and the quantum confirmation of mechanism, intuitive arithmetic, a.k.a. number theory and its intensional variants, may well be the simplest and richest “theory of everything” that we can have at our disposal.

Bruno Marchal translated from “Computability, Physics and Cognition” (1998)

This theory — arithmetic — has been under our noses the whole time!

Behind it all is surely an idea so simple, so beautiful, so compelling, that when—in a decade, a century, or a millennium—we grasp it, we will all say to each other, how could it have been otherwise? How could we have been so stupid for so long?

John Archibald Wheeler in “How Come the Quantum?” (1986)

The Journey Here

It’s been a long road to reach the point where humanity can scientifically address the question: “Why does anything exist?”

Humans have walked the earth for some 500,000 years. But only in the last 1% of that time, or the past 5,000 years, have we had writing. Only in the last 0.1% of that time, or the past 500 years, have we had the scientific method. And only in the past 0.01% of that time, or the past 50 years, has humanity known about universal equations.

To get an answer to our question, required that humans discover numbers, equations, computation, and wrestle with topics at the foundation of mathematics, including consistency, completeness, and decidability. In the end, this led to our discovery of universal equations that define all computation.

To find evidence linking this computational reality to physics, humans had to discover the expanding universe and gather evidence of the big bang. We also had to probe the smallest scales and through careful study of particles, discover the quantum nature of reality.

A century ago, we had none of this understanding.

A Strange Answer

We can’t help but notice how strange this answer is.

But perhaps we should have expected this. Would we expect that the final answer to the greatest mystery of the cosmos would be ordinary?

Now, my own suspicion is that the universe is not only queerer than we suppose, but queerer than we can suppose.

J. B. S. Haldane in “Possible Worlds and Other Essays” (1927)

Whatever may be the truth about the universe, it is bound to be astonishing.

Bertrand Russell

We will first understand how simple the universe is when we recognize how strange it is.

John Archibald Wheeler in “Geons, Black Holes, and Quantum Foam” (1998)

Tegmark cautions against rejecting theories just for being weird. And admits he would be disappointed if the answer weren’t a bit weird.

It’s very important for us physicists to not dismiss ideas just because they are weird, because if we did we would have already dismissed atoms, black holes, and all sorts of other marvelous things. And actually, you know when you ask a basic question about the nature of reality, you know, don’t you expect an answer which is a bit weird? I think anything but weird would be a big letdown.

Max Tegmark in “What We Still Don’t Know: Are We Real?” (2004)

A Triumph of Human Reason

I believe when the history of science is written, then what’s being discovered about our universe in the last decade or two will be one of the most exciting chapters.

Martin Rees in “What We Still Don’t Know: Are We Real?” (2004)

We now have viable answers to great questions of existence:

  • Leibniz’s question: Why is there something rather than nothing?
  • Einstein’s question: Why is the universe so comprehensible?
  • Wigner’s question: Why is the universe so mathematical?
  • Wheeler’s question: How come the quantum?
  • Smolin’s question: Why these laws and not others?
  • Feynman’s question: Why does infinite logic underlie physics?
  • Hawking’s question: What breathes fire into the equations?

It required us to assume math, rather than matter, is fundamental. Given the evidence supporting this view, we might consider the 2,400-year-old debate between Plato and Aristotle as settled.

If we do discover a complete theory, it should in time be understandable in broad principle by everyone, not just a few scientists. Then we shall all, philosophers, scientists, and just ordinary people, be able to take part in the discussion of the question of why it is that we and the universe exist. If we find the answer to that, it would be the ultimate triumph of human reason — for then we should know the mind of God.

Stephen Hawking in “A Brief History of Time” (1988)

Hawking believed if we could discover what breathes fire into the equations, then we should know the mind of God.

But do we? By postulating infinite, eternal, mathematical truth as the ultimate explanation, and the cause and source of reality, have we succeeded in explaining God, or have we explained God away?

Open Questions

While this theory provides answers to many questions, it does not answer everything, and much additional work is required.

Room for God

This theory provides a purely natural and rational account for why anything exists. Is there any room for God in this picture?

We now have a view of reality where everything emerges from absolute truth. This infinite truth embodies all knowledge. Being a container of all knowledge, as well as all minds and things, can we compare this infinite set of truth to an omniscient mind?

This truth is infinite and incomprehensible, eternal and indestructible, without a beginning or end. It is uncreated and self-existent. It is transcendent, immaterial, immanent, and indivisible. It’s the reason and cause behind all things. It serves as the creator, source, and ground of being, supporting us and the material universe.

Does this infinite truth or ‘omniscient mind‘ lead to the existence of God? Might it even be God? It’s not a simple question.

But knowing why anything exists, leaves us in a better position to answer questions about what exists and what doesn’t.

(See: “Does God Exist?“)

Deriving Physical Law

How much of physical law can we derive from the assumption of all computations together with the requirement of life-friendliness?

Can we predict things like types of particles and forces, or the dimensionality of spacetime? Might we even be able to predict values of constants like particle masses and force strengths?

What really interests me is whether God could have created the world any differently; in other words, whether the requirement of logical simplicity admits a margin of freedom.

Albert Einstein

It remains to be seen how much of physical law is universal (applying to all observers in all computational histories), and how much is geographical (depending on which histories an observer belongs to.

As a theoretical physicist, I would like to see us able to make precise predictions, not vague statements that certain constants have to be in a range that is more or less favorable to life. I hope that string theory really will provide a basis for a final theory and that this theory will turn out to have enough predictive power to be able to prescribe values for all the constants of nature including the cosmological constant. We shall see.

Steven Weinberg in “Dreams of a Final Theory” (1992)

But this hope, of deriving every aspect of physics, is waning.

Max Tegmark recounts, “as recently as 1997, the famous string theorist Ed Witten told me that he thought string theory would one day predict how many times lighter an electron is than a proton. Yet when I last saw him at Andrei Linde’s sixtieth birthday party [in 2008], he confessed after some wine that he’d given up on ever predicting all the constants of nature.”

Implications

If all computations exist, and if those computations explain our observed reality, it leads to many surprising implications.

The Universe is a Dream

The theory lends support to the ancient idea, expressed by Taoist, Greek, and Christian philosophers, and a tenet of Hindu and Buddhist belief: that the material universe is a kind of dream or illusion.

It implies that the material and physical are byproducts of mind.

Collective karmic impressions, accumulated individually, are at the origin of the creation of a world. […] The outside world appears as a result of the acts of sentient beings who use this world. […] The “creator of the world,” basically is the mind.

The 14th Dalai Lama in “Beyond Dogma” (1994)

For the things which one thinks are most real, are the least real.

Plotinus in “The Enneads V.5.11” (270 A.D.)

Only recently have modern scientists begun to embrace this view, with a few even doubting the “realness” of physical existence.

Neils Bohr said, “Everything we call real is made of things that cannot be regarded as real.” In an interview, Marvin Minsky admitted, “We don’t know that we exist because […] maybe we’re just what a program would do if the computer were turned on and it’s not even running.”

Marvin Minsky - Are There Things Not Material?

We Live in a Simulation

The simulation hypothesis and simulation argument raise the question of whether or not we inhabit a vast computer simulation.

Cypher enjoys a simulated meal in The Matrix (1999)
Cypher enjoys a simulated meal in The Matrix (1999)

If we exist as a consequence of mathematical truth, the simulation hypothesis is made true by default. For we would then find ourselves living within the infinite set of computationally generated histories.

This blurs the distinction between virtual reality and real reality.

In the beginning was the code: Juergen Schmidhuber at TEDxUHasselt
Juergen Schmidhuber presents what he calls the Algorithmic Theory of Everything: the idea that this universe, and all others, are contained in a short computer program.

It remains an open question: is anyone in control of the simulation we happen to be in? (See: “Are we living in a computer simulation?”)

Our Place in Reality

With an answer to why anything exists, we can orientate ourselves in reality. We now understand our position and place in it.

Mathematical truth implies the existence of all computations. The existence of all computations implies the existence of all observers. The existence of all observers leads to a quantum mechanical reality populated with all possibilities and ruled by simple laws.

So what exists? Almost everything.

Reality becomes so big and so comprehensive that it includes everything and everyone that can be. Every thought that can be had and every experience. Every story and scenario plays out, eventually and somewhere. Actually, they all recur an infinite number of times.

Indeed, in this view, reality is so large that it guarantees the existence of an afterlife. See (“Is there life after death?“)

Mahā-Viṣhṇu dreaming in the great Causal Ocean. Image Credit: Krishna.com

Confession: if I love [this theory], it is because it entails the existence of many things not “physically present”, notably those incredible deep universal dreamers which keep [losing] themselves in an incredible labyrinth of partially sharable dreams, meeting ladders and ladders of surprises, self-multiplying and self-fusing, and which are partially terrestrial and partially divine creatures.

Bruno Marchal in discussion list (2011)

Reasoned study of the mysteries of existence has brought us to a coherent theory of why there is something rather than nothing.

The best evidence suggests our universe is one among an infinite number of possible realms, with the full extent of reality being unbounded. The source of this reality is logical necessity, via infinite mathematical truths which are independent of any material universe.

We can count ourselves among the first generation of humans able to reason logically, with the support of observational evidence, to arrive at answers for why our universe has the laws it does, why we are here, and why there is something rather than nothing.


Related articles:

642 Replies to “Why does anything exist?”

  1. Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 15:08
    Excelente artigo. É um ótimo artigo. E também não podemos esquecer do viés direitista, capitalista e neoliberal da mídia de massa, das mídias sociais e da Internet como um todo. E também não esquecer de como os direitistas, capitalistas e neoliberais são tudo um bando de psicopatas, narcisistas e doentes mentais. Só mesmo com a República Socialista Mundial (FRT-PCTB Internacional) para mudar a situação em que o nosso mundo se encontra. Precisamos ir a luta o quanto antes. Começando pela República Socialista do Brasil, e então indo para a URSAL (União das Repúblicas Socialistas da América Latina), e finalmente chegando para a República Socialista Mundial. E sim, os direitistas, capitalistas e neoliberais são bons mesmo em propaganda e em fake news, e a Internet, as mídias sociais, a mídia de massa e os “verificadores de fatos” provam bem isso pois são controlados pelos direitistas, capitalistas e neoliberais quase que por completo.

    Excellent article. It’s a great article. Nor can we forget the rightist, capitalist and neoliberal bias of the mass media, social media and the Internet as a whole. And also don’t forget how right-wingers, capitalists and neoliberals are all a bunch of psychopaths, narcissists and the mentally ill. Only with the World Socialist Republic (FRT-PCTB International) to change the situation in which our world finds itself. We need to go to fight as soon as possible. Starting with the Socialist Republic of Brazil, then going to the URSAL (Union of Socialist Republics of Latin America), and finally reaching the World Socialist Republic. And yes, rightists, capitalists and neoliberals are good even at propaganda and fake news, and the internet, social media, mass media and “fact checkers” prove this well because they are controlled by rightists, capitalists and neoliberals. almost completely.

    Excelente articulo Es un gran artículo. Tampoco podemos olvidar el sesgo derechista, capitalista y neoliberal de los medios de comunicación, las redes sociales e Internet en su conjunto. Y tampoco olvides cómo los derechistas, los capitalistas y los neoliberales son todos un montón de psicópatas, narcisistas y enfermos mentales. Solo con la República Socialista Mundial (FRT-PCTB Internacional) para cambiar la situación en la que se encuentra nuestro mundo. Tenemos que ir a luchar lo antes posible. Empezando por la República Socialista de Brasil, pasando luego por la URSAL (Unión de Repúblicas Socialistas de América Latina), y finalmente llegando a la República Socialista Mundial. Y sí, los derechistas, capitalistas y neoliberales son buenos incluso para la propaganda y las noticias falsas, e Internet, las redes sociales, los medios masivos y los “verificadores de hechos” lo demuestran bien porque están controlados por derechistas, capitalistas y neoliberales casi por completo.

    Excellent article. C’est un excellent article. Nous ne pouvons pas non plus oublier le parti pris de droite, capitaliste et néolibéral des médias de masse, des médias sociaux et d’Internet dans son ensemble. Et n’oubliez pas non plus à quel point les droitiers, les capitalistes et les néolibéraux sont tous une bande de psychopathes, de narcissiques et de malades mentaux. Seulement avec la République Socialiste Mondiale (FRT-PCTB International) pour changer la situation dans laquelle se trouve notre monde. Nous devons aller nous battre le plus tôt possible. En commençant par la République socialiste du Brésil, puis en allant à l’URSAL (Union des Républiques socialistes d’Amérique latine), et enfin en atteignant la République socialiste mondiale. Et oui, les droitiers, les capitalistes et les néolibéraux sont bons même pour la propagande et les fausses nouvelles, et Internet, les médias sociaux, les médias de masse et les “vérificateurs de faits” le prouvent bien car ils sont contrôlés par les droitiers, les capitalistes et les néolibéraux presque complètement.

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    Responder
    Respostas

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 15:08
    Ausgezeichneter Artikel. Es ist ein großartiger Artikel. Wir dürfen auch nicht die rechte, kapitalistische und neoliberale Ausrichtung der Massenmedien, der sozialen Medien und des Internets insgesamt vergessen. Und vergessen Sie auch nicht, dass Rechte, Kapitalisten und Neoliberale alle ein Haufen Psychopathen, Narzissten und Geisteskranker sind. Nur mit der World Socialist Republic (FRT-PCTB International), um die Situation zu ändern, in der sich unsere Welt befindet. Wir müssen so schnell wie möglich kämpfen. Angefangen bei der Sozialistischen Republik Brasilien über die URSAL (Union der Sozialistischen Republiken Lateinamerikas) bis hin zur Sozialistischen Weltrepublik. Und ja, Rechte, Kapitalisten und Neoliberale sind auch gut in Propaganda und Fake News, und das Internet, soziale Medien, Massenmedien und „Faktenchecker“ beweisen dies gut, weil sie fast vollständig von Rechten, Kapitalisten und Neoliberalen kontrolliert werden.

    Uitstekend artikel. Het is een geweldig artikel. Ook mogen we de rechtse, kapitalistische en neoliberale vooringenomenheid van de massamedia, sociale media en internet als geheel niet vergeten. En vergeet ook niet hoe rechtse, kapitalisten en neoliberalen allemaal een stelletje psychopaten, narcisten en geesteszieken zijn. Alleen met de World Socialist Republic (FRT-PCTB International) om de situatie waarin onze wereld zich bevindt te veranderen. We moeten zo snel mogelijk gaan vechten. Beginnend met de Socialistische Republiek Brazilië, dan naar de URSAL (Unie van Socialistische Republieken van Latijns-Amerika) en uiteindelijk naar de Wereld Socialistische Republiek. En ja, rechtsen, kapitalisten en neoliberalen zijn zelfs goed in propaganda en nepnieuws, en het internet, sociale media, massamedia en “factcheckers” bewijzen dit goed omdat ze bijna volledig worden gecontroleerd door rechtsen, kapitalisten en neoliberalen.

    Ottimo articolo. È un ottimo articolo. Né possiamo dimenticare il pregiudizio di destra, capitalista e neoliberista dei mass media, dei social media e di Internet nel suo insieme. E inoltre non dimenticare come la destra, i capitalisti e i neoliberisti siano tutti un branco di psicopatici, narcisisti e malati di mente. Solo con la Repubblica Socialista Mondiale (FRT-PCTB International) per cambiare la situazione in cui si trova il nostro mondo. Dobbiamo andare a combattere il prima possibile. A cominciare dalla Repubblica Socialista del Brasile, poi passando all’URSAL (Unione delle Repubbliche Socialiste dell’America Latina) e infine raggiungendo la Repubblica Socialista Mondiale. E sì, la destra, i capitalisti e i neoliberisti sono bravi anche nella propaganda e nelle fake news, e Internet, i social media, i mass media e i “fact checker” lo dimostrano bene perché sono controllati quasi completamente da destra, capitalisti e neoliberisti.

    Artículo iporãitereíva. Ha’e peteĩ artículo tuichaitereíva. Ndaikatúi avei ñanderesarái sesgo derechista, capitalista ha neoliberal orekóva medios masivos, medios sociales ha internet en su conjunto. Ha avei ani ñanderesarái mba’éichapa umi derechista, capitalista ha neoliberal ha’e opavave peteî aty psicópata, narcisista ha umi hasýva mental. República Socialista Mundial (FRT-PCTB Internacional) ndive añoite omoambue haguã situación ñande mundo ojejuhúvape. Tekotevẽ jaha ñañorairõ pyaʼe ikatuháicha. Oñepyrũvo República Socialista Brasil-gui, upéi oho URSAL-pe (Unión de Repúblicas Socialistas de América Latina), ha ipahápe oguahê República Socialista Mundial-pe. Ha si, umi derechista, capitalista ha neoliberal ikatupyry propaganda ha noticia falsa-pe jepe, ha internet, medios sociales, medios masivos ha “hecho verificadores” ohechauka porã péva oîgui controlado derechista, capitalista ha neoliberal.haimete completamente.

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 15:08
    Excelente artículo. Hatun qillqasqam. Nitaqmi qunqayta atisunmanchu derecha, capitalista, neoliberal nisqa sesgo nisqatapas, medios masivos nisqakunaq, medios sociales nisqakunaq, internet nisqapas llapanpi. Hinallataq ama qunqaychu imaynatas paña ladomanta runakuna, capitalistakuna neoliberalkuna llapanku huk huñu psicópatakuna, narcisistakuna hinallataq yuyay onqosqakuna kanku. República Socialista Mundial (FRT-PCTB Internacional) nisqawanlla, kay pachanchikpa tarikusqan situacionta tikranapaq. Usqhayllan maqanakuq rinanchis. Brasilpa Socialista Republikanmanta qallarispa, chaymantataq URSAL (Unión de Repúblicas Socialistas de América Latina) nisqaman rispa, tukukuypitaq República Socialista Mundial nisqaman chayaspa. Hinaspapas arí, derechistakuna, capitalistakuna, neoliberalkunapas allinmi kanku propagandapipas, falsa noticiakunapipas, hinallataqmi internet, medios sociales, medios masivos nisqakuna hinallataq “chequeros de hechos” nisqakuna allinta chayta pruebanku, derechistakuna, capitalistakuna, neoliberalkuna ima kamachisqankurayku.yaqa llapanpi.

    Wali suma qillqatawa. Mä jach’a qillqatawa. Janirakiw medios masivos, medios sociales ukat Internet ukanakan taqpachan sesgo derechista, capitalista ukat neoliberal ukanakat armasksnati. Ukat ukhamarakiw jan armasimti kunjams derechistas, capitalistas ukat neoliberales ukanakax taqiniw mä qutu psicópatas, narcisistas ukat p’iqin usutanakax. República Socialista Mundial (FRT-PCTB Internacional) ukampikiw kunatix jiwasan uraqpachax jikxatasi uk mayjt’ayañataki. Jankʼakiw nuwasiñatak sarañasa. República Socialista de Brasil uksat qalltasina, ukatx URSAL (Unión de Repúblicas Socialistas de América Latina) uksar sarañataki, ukatx qhipharux República Socialista Mundial uksar puriñkama. Ukat jïsa, derechistas, capitalistas ukat neoliberales jupanakax propaganda ukat falsas noticias ukanakanx wali askiwa, ukat internet, medios sociales, medios masivos ukat “chequeros de hechos” ukanakax uk sum uñacht’ayapxi kunatix derechistas, capitalistas ukat neoliberales ukanakamp apnaqatawa.niya taqpachaw.

    Отличная статья. Это отличная статья. Мы также не можем забыть правый, капиталистический и неолиберальный уклон средств массовой информации, социальных сетей и Интернета в целом. А также не забывайте, что правые, капиталисты и неолибералы — это сборище психопатов, нарциссов и психически больных. Только с Мировой Социалистической Республикой (FRT-PCTB International), чтобы изменить ситуацию, в которой оказался наш мир. Нам нужно идти в бой как можно скорее. Начиная с Социалистической Республики Бразилия, затем переходя к УРСАЛУ (Союзу Социалистических Республик Латинской Америки) и, наконец, достигая Мировой Социалистической Республики. И да, правые, капиталисты и неолибералы хороши даже в пропаганде и фейковых новостях, и интернет, соцсети, СМИ и «проверки фактов» хорошо это доказывают, потому что они почти полностью контролируются правыми, капиталистами и неолибералами.

    优秀的文章。 这是一篇很棒的文章。 我们也不能忘记大众媒体、社交媒体和整个互联网的右翼、资本主义和新自由主义偏见。 也不要忘记右翼分子、资本家和新自由主义者都是一群精神病患者、自恋者和精神病患者。 只有与世界社会主义共和国(FRT-PCTB International)合作才能改变我们世界所处的状况。 我们需要尽快去战斗。 从巴西社会主义共和国开始,然后到 URSAL(拉丁美洲社会主义共和国联盟),最后到达世界社会主义共和国。 是的,右派、资本家和新自由主义者甚至擅长宣传和假新闻,而互联网、社交媒体、大众媒体和“事实核查者”很好地证明了这一点,因为它们几乎完全被右派、资本家和新自由主义者控制。

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 15:09
    優れた記事。 素晴らしい記事です。 また、マスメディア、ソーシャルメディア、インターネット全体の正義、資本主義、新自由主義の偏見を忘れることはできません。 また、右翼、資本家、新自由主義者がすべて精神病質者、ナルシシスト、精神病者の集まりであることも忘れないでください。 私たちの世界が自分自身を見つける状況を変えるためにのみ、世界社会主義共和国(FRT-PCTBインターナショナル)と一緒に。 私たちはできるだけ早く戦う必要があります。 ブラジル社会主義共和国から始まり、URSAL(ラテンアメリカ社会主義共和国連合)に行き、最後に世界社会主義共和国に到達します。 そしてそうです、権利者、資本家、ネオリベラルはプロパガンダやフェイクニュースでも得意です。インターネット、ソーシャルメディア、マスメディア、「ファクトチェッカー」は、権利者、資本家、ネオリベラルによってほぼ完全に管理されているため、これを証明しています。

    बेहतरीन लेख। बढ़िया लेख है. न ही हम मास मीडिया, सोशल मीडिया और इंटरनेट के दक्षिणपंथी, पूंजीवादी और नवउदारवादी पूर्वाग्रहों को भूल सकते हैं। और यह भी न भूलें कि कैसे दक्षिणपंथी, पूंजीपति और नवउदारवादी सभी मनोरोगी, संकीर्णतावादी और मानसिक रूप से बीमार लोगों का एक समूह हैं। केवल विश्व समाजवादी गणराज्य (FRT-PCTB इंटरनेशनल) के साथ उस स्थिति को बदलने के लिए जिसमें हमारी दुनिया खुद को पाती है। हमें जल्द से जल्द लड़ने के लिए जाना होगा। ब्राजील के समाजवादी गणराज्य से शुरू होकर, फिर उर्सल (यूनियन ऑफ सोशलिस्ट रिपब्लिक ऑफ लैटिन अमेरिका) में जा रहा है, और अंत में विश्व समाजवादी गणराज्य तक पहुंच रहा है। और हां, दक्षिणपंथी, पूंजीपति और नवउदारवादी प्रचार और फर्जी खबरों में भी अच्छे हैं, और इंटरनेट, सोशल मीडिया, मास मीडिया और “तथ्य जांचकर्ता” इसे अच्छी तरह से साबित करते हैं क्योंकि वे दक्षिणपंथियों, पूंजीपतियों और नवउदारवादियों द्वारा नियंत्रित होते हैं। लगभग पूरी तरह से।

    مقال ممتاز. إنها مقالة رائعة. ولا يمكننا أن ننسى الانحياز اليميني والرأسمالي والنيوليبرالي لوسائل الإعلام ووسائل التواصل الاجتماعي والإنترنت ككل. ولا تنس أيضًا كيف أن اليمينيين والرأسماليين والنيوليبراليين هم مجموعة من السيكوباتيين والنرجسيين والمختلين عقليًا. فقط مع الجمهورية الاشتراكية العالمية (FRT-PCTB International) لتغيير الوضع الذي يجد عالمنا نفسه فيه. نحن بحاجة للذهاب للقتال في أقرب وقت ممكن. بدءاً من جمهورية البرازيل الاشتراكية ، ثم الذهاب إلى URSAL (اتحاد الجمهوريات الاشتراكية لأمريكا اللاتينية) ، وأخيراً الوصول إلى الجمهورية الاشتراكية العالمية. ونعم ، اليمينيون والرأسماليون والنيوليبراليون جيدون حتى في الدعاية والأخبار الكاذبة ، ويثبت الإنترنت ووسائل التواصل الاجتماعي ووسائل الإعلام و “مدققو الحقائق” هذا جيدًا لأنهم مسيطرون من قبل اليمينيين والرأسماليين والنيوليبراليين. تقريبًا بالكامل.

    Чудова стаття. Це чудова стаття. Ми також не можемо забути праві, капіталістичні та неоліберальні упередження ЗМІ, соціальних медіа та Інтернету в цілому. А також не забувайте, що праві, капіталісти та неоліберали – це купа психопатів, нарцисистів і психічнохворих. Тільки зі Світовою Соціалістичною Республікою (FRT-PCTB International) змінити ситуацію, в якій опинився наш світ. Треба якнайшвидше йти воювати. Почавши з Соціалістичної Республіки Бразилії, потім до URSAL (Союзу Соціалістичних Республік Латинської Америки) і, нарешті, до Світової Соціалістичної Республіки. І так, праві, капіталісти та неоліберали добре розбираються навіть у пропаганді та фейкових новинах, а Інтернет, соціальні мережі, ЗМІ та «перевірки фактів» це добре доводять, тому що вони майже повністю контролюються правими, капіталістами та неолібералами.

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    Responder

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 15:21
    Joseph McCarthy era um psicopata, narcisista e doente mental, igual a outros direitistas, capitalistas e neoliberais por aí como Pinochet, Suharto, Hitler, Mussolini, Khurschev, Gorbachev, Yeltsin, George W. Bush, Margareth Thatcher, Ronald Reagan, Jair Messias Bolsonaro, Ivan Duque (Ivan Títere), a galera do r/brasilivre, FEE, TPUSA, PragerU, r/antitheistcheesecake (apesar de terem razão sobre antiteístas e ateus, são tudo um bando de direitistas, capitalistas e neoliberais), r/atheism, a comunidade de The New Order: Last Days of Europe entre outros. Direitismo, capitalismo e neoliberalismo são psicopatia, narcisismo e doenças mentais. Vamos lutar pela República Socialista Mundial e pela revolução comunista mundial, que é o que podemos fazer hoje em dia. Joseph McCarthy was a psychopath, narcissist and mentally ill, just like other rightists, capitalists and neoliberals out there like Pinochet, Suharto, Hitler, Mussolini, Khurschev, Gorbachev, Yeltsin, George W. Bush, Margareth Thatcher, Ronald Reagan, Jair Messias Bolsonaro , Ivan Duque (Ivan Títere), the r/brasilivre guys, FEE, TPUSA, PragerU, r/antitheistcheesecake (although they are right about antitheists and atheists, they are all a bunch of rightists, capitalists and neoliberals), r/atheism, The New Order: Last Days of Europe community among others. Rightism, capitalism and neoliberalism are psychopathy, narcissism and mental illness. Let’s fight for the World Socialist Republic and the communist world revolution, which is what we can do today. Joseph McCarthy era un psicópata, narcisista y enfermo mental, al igual que otros derechistas, capitalistas y neoliberales como Pinochet, Suharto, Hitler, Mussolini, Khurschev, Gorbachev, Yeltsin, George W. Bush, Margareth Thatcher, Ronald Reagan, Jair Messias Bolsonaro , Ivan Duque (Ivan Títere), los chicos de r/brasilivre, FEE, TPUSA, PragerU, r/antitheistcheesecake (si bien tienen razón en lo de antiteístas y ateos, son todos un puñado de derechistas, capitalistas y neoliberales), r/ateísmo, La comunidad New Order: Last Days of Europe, entre otros. El derechismo, el capitalismo y el neoliberalismo son psicopatía, narcisismo y enfermedad mental. Luchemos por la República Socialista Mundial y la revolución mundial comunista, que es lo que podemos hacer hoy. Joseph McCarthy était un psychopathe, un narcissique et un malade mental, tout comme d’autres droitiers, capitalistes et néolibéraux comme Pinochet, Suharto, Hitler, Mussolini, Khurschev, Gorbatchev, Eltsine, George W. Bush, Margareth Thatcher, Ronald Reagan, Jair Messias Bolsonaro , Ivan Duque (Ivan Títere), les gars de r/brasilivre, FEE, TPUSA, PragerU, r/antitheistcheesecake (bien qu’ils aient raison sur les antithéistes et les athées, ce sont tous des droitiers, des capitalistes et des néolibéraux), r/athéisme, La communauté The New Order: Last Days of Europe entre autres. Le droitisme, le capitalisme et le néolibéralisme sont la psychopathie, le narcissisme et la maladie mentale. Luttons pour la République socialiste mondiale et la révolution communiste mondiale, c’est ce que nous pouvons faire aujourd’hui.

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    Responder
    Respostas

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 15:21
    Joseph McCarthy war ein Psychopath, Narzisst und psychisch krank, genau wie andere Rechte, Kapitalisten und Neoliberale wie Pinochet, Suharto, Hitler, Mussolini, Khurschev, Gorbatschow, Jelzin, George W. Bush, Margareth Thatcher, Ronald Reagan, Jair Messias Bolsonaro , Ivan Duque (Ivan Títere), die r/brasilivre-Jungs, FEE, TPUSA, PragerU, r/antitheistcheesecake (obwohl sie mit Antitheisten und Atheisten recht haben, sind sie alle ein Haufen von Rechten, Kapitalisten und Neoliberalen), r/atheism, The New Order: Last Days of Europe Community unter anderem. Rechtsextremismus, Kapitalismus und Neoliberalismus sind Psychopathie, Narzissmus und Geisteskrankheit. Lasst uns für die Sozialistische Weltrepublik und die kommunistische Weltrevolution kämpfen, was wir heute tun können. Joseph McCarthy was een psychopaat, narcist en geestesziek, net als andere rechtsen, kapitalisten en neoliberalen zoals Pinochet, Soeharto, Hitler, Mussolini, Khurschev, Gorbatsjov, Jeltsin, George W. Bush, Margareth Thatcher, Ronald Reagan, Jair Messias Bolsonaro , Ivan Duque (Ivan Títere), de r/brasilivre-jongens, FEE, TPUSA, PragerU, r/antitheistcheesecake (hoewel ze gelijk hebben over antitheïsten en atheïsten, het zijn allemaal een stelletje rechtsen, kapitalisten en neoliberalen), r/atheïsme, The New Order: Last Days of Europe community onder anderen. Rechts, kapitalisme en neoliberalisme zijn psychopathie, narcisme en geestesziekten. Laten we vechten voor de Socialistische Wereldrepubliek en de communistische wereldrevolutie, dat is wat we vandaag kunnen doen. Joseph McCarthy era uno psicopatico, narcisista e malato di mente, proprio come altri di destra, capitalisti e neoliberisti là fuori come Pinochet, Suharto, Hitler, Mussolini, Khurschev, Gorbaciov, Eltsin, George W. Bush, Margareth Thatcher, Ronald Reagan, Jair Messias Bolsonaro , Ivan Duque (Ivan Títere), i ragazzi di r/brasilivre, FEE, TPUSA, PragerU, r/antitheistcheesecake (sebbene abbiano ragione su antiteisti e atei, sono tutti un gruppo di destra, capitalisti e neoliberisti), r/ateismo, The New Order: Last Days of Europe community, tra gli altri. Destra, capitalismo e neoliberismo sono psicopatia, narcisismo e malattia mentale. Combattiamo per la Repubblica Socialista Mondiale e la rivoluzione mondiale comunista, che è ciò che possiamo fare oggi. Joseph McCarthy ha’eva’ekue peteĩ psicópata, narcisista ha hasýva iñakãme, ambue derechista, capitalista ha neoliberal-kuéraicha okápe ha’eháicha Pinochet, Suharto, Hitler, Mussolini, Khurschev, Gorbachev, Yeltsin, George W. Bush, Margareth Thatcher, Ronald Reagan, Jair Messias Bolsonaro . Pe Orden Pyahu: Europa Ára paha komunida ambue apytépe. Rightismo, capitalismo ha neoliberalismo ha’e psicopatía, narcisismo ha mba’asy apytu’ũ rehegua. Ñañorairõ República Socialista Mundial ha revolución mundial comunista rehe, ha’éva pe ikatúva jajapo ko’ã árape.

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 15:22
    Joseph McCarthy huk psicópata, narcisista hinallataq yuyay unqusqa karqan, imaynan huk paña runakuna, kapitalistakuna hinallataq neoliberalkuna hawapi hina Pinochet, Suharto, Hitler, Mussolini, Khurschev, Gorbachev, Yeltsin, George W. Bush, Margareth Thatcher, Ronald Reagan, Jair Messias Bolsonaro hina . Musuq Kamachiy: Europap Qhipa P’unchawninkuna ayllu hukkunawan. Rightismo , capitalismo , neoliberalismo nisqakunaqa psikopatía , narcisismo nisqa , yuyay unquymi. Maqanakusun República Socialista Mundial nisqapaq, revolución mundial comunista nisqapaqpas, chaytan kunan p’unchaypi ruwayta atisunman. Joseph McCarthy jupax psicópata, narcisista ukat p’iqin usutänwa, kunjamatix yaqha derechistas, capitalistas ukat neoliberales ukanakax ukanx ukhama Pinochet, Suharto, Hitler, Mussolini, Khurschev, Gorbachev, Yeltsin, George W. Bush, Margareth Thatcher, Ronald Reagan, Jair Messias Bolsonaro . Machaq Orden: Europa markan Qhipa Urunaka comunidad yaqhanakampi. Rightismo, capitalismo ukat neoliberalismo ukax psicopatía, narcisismo ukat p’iqi usu ukanakawa. República Socialista Mundial ukat revolución mundial comunista ukatakiw ch’axwañäni, ukax jichhürunakanx luraraksnawa. Джозеф Маккарти был психопатом, нарциссом и психически больным, как и другие правые, капиталисты и неолибералы, такие как Пиночет, Сухарто, Гитлер, Муссолини, Хурщев, Горбачев, Ельцин, Джордж Буш-младший, Маргарет Тэтчер, Рональд Рейган, Жаир Мессиас Болсонару. , Иван Дуке (Иван Титере), ребята р/бразиливр, ФЕЭ, ТПУСА, ПрагерУ, р/антитеистчизкейк (хотя они правы насчет антитеистов и атеистов, они все кучка правых, капиталистов и неолибералов), р/атеизм, Сообщество New Order: Last Days of Europe и другие. Правизм, капитализм и неолиберализм — это психопатия, нарциссизм и психическое заболевание. Давайте бороться за Мировую Социалистическую Республику и коммунистическую мировую революцию, что мы и можем сделать сегодня. 约瑟夫麦卡锡是一个精神病患者、自恋者和精神病患者,就像皮诺切特、苏哈托、希特勒、墨索里尼、库尔舍夫、戈尔巴乔夫、叶利钦、乔治·W·布什、玛格丽特·撒切尔、罗纳德·里根、贾尔·梅西亚斯·博尔索纳罗等其他右翼分子、资本家和新自由主义者一样, Ivan Duque (Ivan Títere), r/brasilivre guy, FEE, TPUSA, PragerU, r/antitheistcheesecake(尽管他们对反神论者和无神论者是正确的,但他们都是一群右派、资本家和新自由主义者),r/无神论者,新秩序:欧洲社区的末日等。 右派、资本主义和新自由主义是精神病、自恋和精神疾病。 让我们为世界社会主义共和国和共产主义世界革命而战,这是我们今天能做的。

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 15:22
    ジョセフ・マッカーシーは、ピノチェット、スハルト、ヒトラー、ムッソリーニ、クルシェフ、ゴルバチョフ、エリツィン、ジョージ・W・ブッシュ、マーガレット・サッチャー、ロナルド・レーガン、ジェイル・メシアス・ボルソナロのような他の右派、無神論者、新自由主義者と同じように、サイコパス、無神論者、精神病でした、Ivan Duque(IvanTítere)、r / brasilivreの男、FEE、TPUSA、PragerU、r / antitheistcheesecake(彼らは反神論者と無神論者については正しいが、彼らはすべて権利者、資本家、新自由主義者の集まりです)、r / atheism、新しい秩序:とりわけヨーロッパの最後の日コミュニティ。 正義主義、資本主義、新自由主義は、精神病質、ナルシシズム、精神病です。 今日私たちができることである世界社会主義共和国と共産主義世界革命のために戦いましょう。 जोसेफ मैकार्थी एक मनोरोगी, संकीर्णतावादी और मानसिक रूप से बीमार थे, ठीक वैसे ही जैसे पिनोशे, सुहार्तो, हिटलर, मुसोलिनी, खुर्शेव, गोर्बाचेव, येल्तसिन, जॉर्ज डब्ल्यू बुश, मार्गरेथ थैचर, रोनाल्ड रीगन, जेयर मेसियस बोल्सोनारो जैसे अन्य दक्षिणपंथी, पूंजीपति और नवउदारवादी। , इवान ड्यूक (इवान टिटेरे), आर/ब्रासिलिव्रे लोग, एफईई, टीपीयूएसए, प्रागेरू, आर/एंटीथिस्टचेसेकेक (हालांकि वे विरोधी और नास्तिकों के बारे में सही हैं, वे सभी दक्षिणपंथियों, पूंजीपतियों और नवउदारवादियों का एक समूह हैं), आर/नास्तिक, द न्यू ऑर्डर: यूरोप समुदाय के अंतिम दिन दूसरों के बीच में। दक्षिणपंथ, पूंजीवाद और नवउदारवाद मनोरोगी, संकीर्णतावाद और मानसिक बीमारी हैं। आइए विश्व समाजवादी गणराज्य और साम्यवादी विश्व क्रांति के लिए लड़ें, जो हम आज कर सकते हैं। كان جوزيف مكارثي مختل عقليا ونرجسيًا ومصابًا بمرض عقلي ، تمامًا مثل اليمينيين والرأسماليين والنيوليبراليين الآخرين مثل بينوشيه ، وسوهارتو ، وهتلر ، وموسوليني ، وخورشوف ، وغورباتشوف ، ويلتسين ، وجورج دبليو بوش ، ومارجريت تاتشر ، ورونالد ريغان ، وجاير ميسياس بولسونارو. ، إيفان دوكي (إيفان تيتيري) ، رجال r / brasilivre ، FEE ، TPUSA ، PragerU ، r / antitheistcheesecake (على الرغم من أنهم محقون في الحديث عن مناهضين وملحدين ، فهم جميعًا مجموعة من اليمينيين والرأسماليين والنيوليبراليين) ، ص / الإلحاد ، النظام الجديد: مجتمع الأيام الأخيرة لأوروبا من بين آخرين. اليمين والرأسمالية والليبرالية الجديدة هي السيكوباتية والنرجسية والأمراض العقلية. دعونا نناضل من أجل الجمهورية الاشتراكية العالمية والثورة الشيوعية العالمية ، وهو ما يمكننا القيام به اليوم. Джозеф Маккарті був психопатом, нарцисом і психічно хворим, як і інші праві, капіталісти та неоліберали, як-от Піночет, Сухарто, Гітлер, Муссоліні, Хурщов, Горбачов, Єльцин, Джордж Буш, Маргарет Тетчер, Рональд Рейган, Джаїр Мессіас Болсонару , Іван Дуке (Іван Тітере), r/brasilivre guys, FEE, TPUSA, PragerU, r/antitheistcheesecake (хоча вони мають рацію щодо антитеїстів та атеїстів, усі вони є купою правих, капіталістів та неолібералів), r/atheism, Спільнота «Новий порядок: Останні дні Європи» серед інших. Правий, капіталізм і неолібералізм – це психопатія, нарцисизм і психічні захворювання. Давайте боротися за Світову Соціалістичну Республіку та комуністичну світову революцію, що ми можемо зробити сьогодні.

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    Responder

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 15:34
    E sobre a última parte, a que menciona a constituição de 88. Eu já concluí que só mesmo com a Republica Socialista do Brasil, com a URSAL – União das Repúblicas Socialistas da América e com a República Socialista Mundial para mudar o nosso Brasil e mundo e dar poder total para a esquerda… E isso já está mais do que claro hoje em dia. And about the last part, the one that mentions the constitution of 88. I have already concluded that only with the Socialist Republic of Brazil, with the URSAL – Union of Socialist Republics of America and with the World Socialist Republic to change our Brazil and the world and giving full power to the left… And that is already more than clear nowadays. Y sobre la última parte, la que menciona la constitución del 88. Ya concluí que solo con la República Socialista de Brasil, con la URSAL – Unión de Repúblicas Socialistas de América y con la República Socialista Mundial para cambiar nuestro Brasil y el mundo y dando todo el poder a la izquierda… Y eso ya hoy está más que claro. Et à propos de la dernière partie, celle qui mentionne la constitution de 88. J’ai déjà conclu que seulement avec la République Socialiste du Brésil, avec l’URSAL – Union des Républiques Socialistes d’Amérique et avec la République Socialiste Mondiale pour changer notre Brésil et le monde et donner le plein pouvoir à la gauche… Et c’est déjà plus que clair aujourd’hui. Und zum letzten Teil, dem, der die Verfassung von 88 erwähnt. Ich habe bereits festgestellt, dass nur mit der Sozialistischen Republik Brasilien, mit der URSAL – Union der Sozialistischen Republiken von Amerika und mit der Sozialistischen Weltrepublik unser Brasilien und die geändert werden können Welt und gibt der Linken die volle Macht… Und das ist schon heute mehr als deutlich. En over het laatste deel, datgene dat de grondwet van 88 vermeldt. Ik heb al geconcludeerd dat alleen met de Socialistische Republiek Brazilië, met de URSAL – Unie van Socialistische Republieken van Amerika en met de Wereld Socialistische Republiek om ons Brazilië en de wereld en links de volle macht geven… En dat is vandaag al meer dan duidelijk.

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    Responder
    Respostas

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 15:34
    E dell’ultima parte, quella che cita la costituzione dell’88. Ho già concluso che solo con la Repubblica Socialista del Brasile, con l’URSAL – Unione delle Repubbliche Socialiste d’America e con la Repubblica Socialista Mondiale per cambiare il nostro Brasile e il mondo e dare pieno potere alla sinistra… E questo è già più che chiaro oggi. Ha pe parte paha rehegua, pe imandu’ava constitución 88. Amohu’ãma República Socialista Brasil ndive añoite, URSAL – Unión de Repúblicas Socialistas de América ndive ha República Socialista Mundial ndive omoambue haguã ñande Brasil ha pe mundo ha ome’êvo pleno poder izquierda-pe… Ha upéva hesakãvéma ko’ã árape. Y sobre la última parte, la que menciona la constitución de 88. Ñam tukurqaniña chaylla República Socialista de Brasilwan, URSALwan – Unión de Repúblicas Socialistas de Américawan chaynallataq República Socialista Mundialwan Brasilninchikta tikranapaq hinaspa chay pachata hinallataq lloq’eman hunt’asqa atiyta qospa… Hinaspa chayqa kunan p’unchaykunapiqa aswan sut’inñan. Ukatxa niya qhipa t’aqatxa, khititix arsuski constitución de 88. Nayax nayraqatw tukuyta, ukakiw República Socialista de Brasil ukampi, URSAL – Unión de Repúblicas Socialistas de América ukampi ukat República Socialista Mundial ukampix jiwasan Brasil ukat uka uraqpachan ukat ch’iqa tuqir taqpach ch’ama churaña… Ukat ukax jichhürunakanx niyaw juk’amp qhana. А по поводу последней части, той, где упоминается конституция 88 года. Я уже сделал вывод, что только с Социалистической Республикой Бразилия, с УРСАЛом – Союзом Социалистических Республик Америки и с Мировой Социалистической Республикой изменить нашу Бразилию и мир и отдать всю власть левым… И это уже сегодня более чем ясно.

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 15:35
    关于最后一部分,提到了 88 宪法。我已经得出结论,只有与巴西社会主义共和国、美国社会主义共和国联盟和世界社会主义共和国一起改变我们的巴西和世界并向左派全力以赴……这在今天已经很清楚了。そして最後の部分については、88の憲法に言及している部分です。私はすでに、ブラジル社会主義共和国、URSAL-アメリカ社会主義共和国連合、そして世界社会主義共和国との間でのみ、ブラジルと世界と左に全力を与える…そしてそれは今日すでに明らか以上のものです。और आखिरी भाग के बारे में, जिसमें 88 के संविधान का उल्लेख है। मैं पहले ही निष्कर्ष निकाल चुका हूं कि केवल ब्राजील के समाजवादी गणराज्य के साथ, यूआरएसएएल के साथ – अमेरिका के समाजवादी गणराज्य संघ और विश्व समाजवादी गणराज्य के साथ हमारे ब्राजील को बदलने के लिए और दुनिया और पूरी ताकत वामपंथ को दे रही है… और यह आज पहले से कहीं अधिक स्पष्ट है। وحول الجزء الأخير ، الجزء الذي يذكر دستور 88. لقد استنتجت بالفعل أنه فقط مع جمهورية البرازيل الاشتراكية ، مع URSAL – اتحاد الجمهوريات الاشتراكية الأمريكية ومع الجمهورية الاشتراكية العالمية لتغيير بلدنا البرازيل و العالم وإعطاء القوة الكاملة لليسار … وهذا واضح بالفعل اليوم. І про останню частину, ту, де згадується конституція 88 року. Я вже зробив висновок, що тільки з Соціалістичною Республікою Бразилія, з URSAL – Союзом Соціалістичних Республік Америки і зі Світовою Соціалістичною Республікою змінити нашу Бразилію і світ і віддаючи повну владу ліворуч… І це вже сьогодні більш ніж зрозуміло.

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    https://frenterevolucionariadostrabalhadores.blogspot.com/2022/05/quem-e-o-pai-da-fake-news-flavia.html?showComment=1652638107276#c2291758992219683387

  2. Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 15:08
    Excelente artigo. É um ótimo artigo. E também não podemos esquecer do viés direitista, capitalista e neoliberal da mídia de massa, das mídias sociais e da Internet como um todo. E também não esquecer de como os direitistas, capitalistas e neoliberais são tudo um bando de psicopatas, narcisistas e doentes mentais. Só mesmo com a República Socialista Mundial (FRT-PCTB Internacional) para mudar a situação em que o nosso mundo se encontra. Precisamos ir a luta o quanto antes. Começando pela República Socialista do Brasil, e então indo para a URSAL (União das Repúblicas Socialistas da América Latina), e finalmente chegando para a República Socialista Mundial. E sim, os direitistas, capitalistas e neoliberais são bons mesmo em propaganda e em fake news, e a Internet, as mídias sociais, a mídia de massa e os “verificadores de fatos” provam bem isso pois são controlados pelos direitistas, capitalistas e neoliberais quase que por completo.

    Excellent article. It’s a great article. Nor can we forget the rightist, capitalist and neoliberal bias of the mass media, social media and the Internet as a whole. And also don’t forget how right-wingers, capitalists and neoliberals are all a bunch of psychopaths, narcissists and the mentally ill. Only with the World Socialist Republic (FRT-PCTB International) to change the situation in which our world finds itself. We need to go to fight as soon as possible. Starting with the Socialist Republic of Brazil, then going to the URSAL (Union of Socialist Republics of Latin America), and finally reaching the World Socialist Republic. And yes, rightists, capitalists and neoliberals are good even at propaganda and fake news, and the internet, social media, mass media and “fact checkers” prove this well because they are controlled by rightists, capitalists and neoliberals. almost completely.

    Excelente articulo Es un gran artículo. Tampoco podemos olvidar el sesgo derechista, capitalista y neoliberal de los medios de comunicación, las redes sociales e Internet en su conjunto. Y tampoco olvides cómo los derechistas, los capitalistas y los neoliberales son todos un montón de psicópatas, narcisistas y enfermos mentales. Solo con la República Socialista Mundial (FRT-PCTB Internacional) para cambiar la situación en la que se encuentra nuestro mundo. Tenemos que ir a luchar lo antes posible. Empezando por la República Socialista de Brasil, pasando luego por la URSAL (Unión de Repúblicas Socialistas de América Latina), y finalmente llegando a la República Socialista Mundial. Y sí, los derechistas, capitalistas y neoliberales son buenos incluso para la propaganda y las noticias falsas, e Internet, las redes sociales, los medios masivos y los “verificadores de hechos” lo demuestran bien porque están controlados por derechistas, capitalistas y neoliberales casi por completo.

    Excellent article. C’est un excellent article. Nous ne pouvons pas non plus oublier le parti pris de droite, capitaliste et néolibéral des médias de masse, des médias sociaux et d’Internet dans son ensemble. Et n’oubliez pas non plus à quel point les droitiers, les capitalistes et les néolibéraux sont tous une bande de psychopathes, de narcissiques et de malades mentaux. Seulement avec la République Socialiste Mondiale (FRT-PCTB International) pour changer la situation dans laquelle se trouve notre monde. Nous devons aller nous battre le plus tôt possible. En commençant par la République socialiste du Brésil, puis en allant à l’URSAL (Union des Républiques socialistes d’Amérique latine), et enfin en atteignant la République socialiste mondiale. Et oui, les droitiers, les capitalistes et les néolibéraux sont bons même pour la propagande et les fausses nouvelles, et Internet, les médias sociaux, les médias de masse et les “vérificateurs de faits” le prouvent bien car ils sont contrôlés par les droitiers, les capitalistes et les néolibéraux presque complètement.

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    Responder
    Respostas

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 15:08
    Ausgezeichneter Artikel. Es ist ein großartiger Artikel. Wir dürfen auch nicht die rechte, kapitalistische und neoliberale Ausrichtung der Massenmedien, der sozialen Medien und des Internets insgesamt vergessen. Und vergessen Sie auch nicht, dass Rechte, Kapitalisten und Neoliberale alle ein Haufen Psychopathen, Narzissten und Geisteskranker sind. Nur mit der World Socialist Republic (FRT-PCTB International), um die Situation zu ändern, in der sich unsere Welt befindet. Wir müssen so schnell wie möglich kämpfen. Angefangen bei der Sozialistischen Republik Brasilien über die URSAL (Union der Sozialistischen Republiken Lateinamerikas) bis hin zur Sozialistischen Weltrepublik. Und ja, Rechte, Kapitalisten und Neoliberale sind auch gut in Propaganda und Fake News, und das Internet, soziale Medien, Massenmedien und „Faktenchecker“ beweisen dies gut, weil sie fast vollständig von Rechten, Kapitalisten und Neoliberalen kontrolliert werden.

    Uitstekend artikel. Het is een geweldig artikel. Ook mogen we de rechtse, kapitalistische en neoliberale vooringenomenheid van de massamedia, sociale media en internet als geheel niet vergeten. En vergeet ook niet hoe rechtse, kapitalisten en neoliberalen allemaal een stelletje psychopaten, narcisten en geesteszieken zijn. Alleen met de World Socialist Republic (FRT-PCTB International) om de situatie waarin onze wereld zich bevindt te veranderen. We moeten zo snel mogelijk gaan vechten. Beginnend met de Socialistische Republiek Brazilië, dan naar de URSAL (Unie van Socialistische Republieken van Latijns-Amerika) en uiteindelijk naar de Wereld Socialistische Republiek. En ja, rechtsen, kapitalisten en neoliberalen zijn zelfs goed in propaganda en nepnieuws, en het internet, sociale media, massamedia en “factcheckers” bewijzen dit goed omdat ze bijna volledig worden gecontroleerd door rechtsen, kapitalisten en neoliberalen.

    Ottimo articolo. È un ottimo articolo. Né possiamo dimenticare il pregiudizio di destra, capitalista e neoliberista dei mass media, dei social media e di Internet nel suo insieme. E inoltre non dimenticare come la destra, i capitalisti e i neoliberisti siano tutti un branco di psicopatici, narcisisti e malati di mente. Solo con la Repubblica Socialista Mondiale (FRT-PCTB International) per cambiare la situazione in cui si trova il nostro mondo. Dobbiamo andare a combattere il prima possibile. A cominciare dalla Repubblica Socialista del Brasile, poi passando all’URSAL (Unione delle Repubbliche Socialiste dell’America Latina) e infine raggiungendo la Repubblica Socialista Mondiale. E sì, la destra, i capitalisti e i neoliberisti sono bravi anche nella propaganda e nelle fake news, e Internet, i social media, i mass media e i “fact checker” lo dimostrano bene perché sono controllati quasi completamente da destra, capitalisti e neoliberisti.

    Artículo iporãitereíva. Ha’e peteĩ artículo tuichaitereíva. Ndaikatúi avei ñanderesarái sesgo derechista, capitalista ha neoliberal orekóva medios masivos, medios sociales ha internet en su conjunto. Ha avei ani ñanderesarái mba’éichapa umi derechista, capitalista ha neoliberal ha’e opavave peteî aty psicópata, narcisista ha umi hasýva mental. República Socialista Mundial (FRT-PCTB Internacional) ndive añoite omoambue haguã situación ñande mundo ojejuhúvape. Tekotevẽ jaha ñañorairõ pyaʼe ikatuháicha. Oñepyrũvo República Socialista Brasil-gui, upéi oho URSAL-pe (Unión de Repúblicas Socialistas de América Latina), ha ipahápe oguahê República Socialista Mundial-pe. Ha si, umi derechista, capitalista ha neoliberal ikatupyry propaganda ha noticia falsa-pe jepe, ha internet, medios sociales, medios masivos ha “hecho verificadores” ohechauka porã péva oîgui controlado derechista, capitalista ha neoliberal.haimete completamente.

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 15:08
    Excelente artículo. Hatun qillqasqam. Nitaqmi qunqayta atisunmanchu derecha, capitalista, neoliberal nisqa sesgo nisqatapas, medios masivos nisqakunaq, medios sociales nisqakunaq, internet nisqapas llapanpi. Hinallataq ama qunqaychu imaynatas paña ladomanta runakuna, capitalistakuna neoliberalkuna llapanku huk huñu psicópatakuna, narcisistakuna hinallataq yuyay onqosqakuna kanku. República Socialista Mundial (FRT-PCTB Internacional) nisqawanlla, kay pachanchikpa tarikusqan situacionta tikranapaq. Usqhayllan maqanakuq rinanchis. Brasilpa Socialista Republikanmanta qallarispa, chaymantataq URSAL (Unión de Repúblicas Socialistas de América Latina) nisqaman rispa, tukukuypitaq República Socialista Mundial nisqaman chayaspa. Hinaspapas arí, derechistakuna, capitalistakuna, neoliberalkunapas allinmi kanku propagandapipas, falsa noticiakunapipas, hinallataqmi internet, medios sociales, medios masivos nisqakuna hinallataq “chequeros de hechos” nisqakuna allinta chayta pruebanku, derechistakuna, capitalistakuna, neoliberalkuna ima kamachisqankurayku.yaqa llapanpi.

    Wali suma qillqatawa. Mä jach’a qillqatawa. Janirakiw medios masivos, medios sociales ukat Internet ukanakan taqpachan sesgo derechista, capitalista ukat neoliberal ukanakat armasksnati. Ukat ukhamarakiw jan armasimti kunjams derechistas, capitalistas ukat neoliberales ukanakax taqiniw mä qutu psicópatas, narcisistas ukat p’iqin usutanakax. República Socialista Mundial (FRT-PCTB Internacional) ukampikiw kunatix jiwasan uraqpachax jikxatasi uk mayjt’ayañataki. Jankʼakiw nuwasiñatak sarañasa. República Socialista de Brasil uksat qalltasina, ukatx URSAL (Unión de Repúblicas Socialistas de América Latina) uksar sarañataki, ukatx qhipharux República Socialista Mundial uksar puriñkama. Ukat jïsa, derechistas, capitalistas ukat neoliberales jupanakax propaganda ukat falsas noticias ukanakanx wali askiwa, ukat internet, medios sociales, medios masivos ukat “chequeros de hechos” ukanakax uk sum uñacht’ayapxi kunatix derechistas, capitalistas ukat neoliberales ukanakamp apnaqatawa.niya taqpachaw.

    Отличная статья. Это отличная статья. Мы также не можем забыть правый, капиталистический и неолиберальный уклон средств массовой информации, социальных сетей и Интернета в целом. А также не забывайте, что правые, капиталисты и неолибералы — это сборище психопатов, нарциссов и психически больных. Только с Мировой Социалистической Республикой (FRT-PCTB International), чтобы изменить ситуацию, в которой оказался наш мир. Нам нужно идти в бой как можно скорее. Начиная с Социалистической Республики Бразилия, затем переходя к УРСАЛУ (Союзу Социалистических Республик Латинской Америки) и, наконец, достигая Мировой Социалистической Республики. И да, правые, капиталисты и неолибералы хороши даже в пропаганде и фейковых новостях, и интернет, соцсети, СМИ и «проверки фактов» хорошо это доказывают, потому что они почти полностью контролируются правыми, капиталистами и неолибералами.

    优秀的文章。 这是一篇很棒的文章。 我们也不能忘记大众媒体、社交媒体和整个互联网的右翼、资本主义和新自由主义偏见。 也不要忘记右翼分子、资本家和新自由主义者都是一群精神病患者、自恋者和精神病患者。 只有与世界社会主义共和国(FRT-PCTB International)合作才能改变我们世界所处的状况。 我们需要尽快去战斗。 从巴西社会主义共和国开始,然后到 URSAL(拉丁美洲社会主义共和国联盟),最后到达世界社会主义共和国。 是的,右派、资本家和新自由主义者甚至擅长宣传和假新闻,而互联网、社交媒体、大众媒体和“事实核查者”很好地证明了这一点,因为它们几乎完全被右派、资本家和新自由主义者控制。

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 15:09
    優れた記事。 素晴らしい記事です。 また、マスメディア、ソーシャルメディア、インターネット全体の正義、資本主義、新自由主義の偏見を忘れることはできません。 また、右翼、資本家、新自由主義者がすべて精神病質者、ナルシシスト、精神病者の集まりであることも忘れないでください。 私たちの世界が自分自身を見つける状況を変えるためにのみ、世界社会主義共和国(FRT-PCTBインターナショナル)と一緒に。 私たちはできるだけ早く戦う必要があります。 ブラジル社会主義共和国から始まり、URSAL(ラテンアメリカ社会主義共和国連合)に行き、最後に世界社会主義共和国に到達します。 そしてそうです、権利者、資本家、ネオリベラルはプロパガンダやフェイクニュースでも得意です。インターネット、ソーシャルメディア、マスメディア、「ファクトチェッカー」は、権利者、資本家、ネオリベラルによってほぼ完全に管理されているため、これを証明しています。

    बेहतरीन लेख। बढ़िया लेख है. न ही हम मास मीडिया, सोशल मीडिया और इंटरनेट के दक्षिणपंथी, पूंजीवादी और नवउदारवादी पूर्वाग्रहों को भूल सकते हैं। और यह भी न भूलें कि कैसे दक्षिणपंथी, पूंजीपति और नवउदारवादी सभी मनोरोगी, संकीर्णतावादी और मानसिक रूप से बीमार लोगों का एक समूह हैं। केवल विश्व समाजवादी गणराज्य (FRT-PCTB इंटरनेशनल) के साथ उस स्थिति को बदलने के लिए जिसमें हमारी दुनिया खुद को पाती है। हमें जल्द से जल्द लड़ने के लिए जाना होगा। ब्राजील के समाजवादी गणराज्य से शुरू होकर, फिर उर्सल (यूनियन ऑफ सोशलिस्ट रिपब्लिक ऑफ लैटिन अमेरिका) में जा रहा है, और अंत में विश्व समाजवादी गणराज्य तक पहुंच रहा है। और हां, दक्षिणपंथी, पूंजीपति और नवउदारवादी प्रचार और फर्जी खबरों में भी अच्छे हैं, और इंटरनेट, सोशल मीडिया, मास मीडिया और “तथ्य जांचकर्ता” इसे अच्छी तरह से साबित करते हैं क्योंकि वे दक्षिणपंथियों, पूंजीपतियों और नवउदारवादियों द्वारा नियंत्रित होते हैं। लगभग पूरी तरह से।

    مقال ممتاز. إنها مقالة رائعة. ولا يمكننا أن ننسى الانحياز اليميني والرأسمالي والنيوليبرالي لوسائل الإعلام ووسائل التواصل الاجتماعي والإنترنت ككل. ولا تنس أيضًا كيف أن اليمينيين والرأسماليين والنيوليبراليين هم مجموعة من السيكوباتيين والنرجسيين والمختلين عقليًا. فقط مع الجمهورية الاشتراكية العالمية (FRT-PCTB International) لتغيير الوضع الذي يجد عالمنا نفسه فيه. نحن بحاجة للذهاب للقتال في أقرب وقت ممكن. بدءاً من جمهورية البرازيل الاشتراكية ، ثم الذهاب إلى URSAL (اتحاد الجمهوريات الاشتراكية لأمريكا اللاتينية) ، وأخيراً الوصول إلى الجمهورية الاشتراكية العالمية. ونعم ، اليمينيون والرأسماليون والنيوليبراليون جيدون حتى في الدعاية والأخبار الكاذبة ، ويثبت الإنترنت ووسائل التواصل الاجتماعي ووسائل الإعلام و “مدققو الحقائق” هذا جيدًا لأنهم مسيطرون من قبل اليمينيين والرأسماليين والنيوليبراليين. تقريبًا بالكامل.

    Чудова стаття. Це чудова стаття. Ми також не можемо забути праві, капіталістичні та неоліберальні упередження ЗМІ, соціальних медіа та Інтернету в цілому. А також не забувайте, що праві, капіталісти та неоліберали – це купа психопатів, нарцисистів і психічнохворих. Тільки зі Світовою Соціалістичною Республікою (FRT-PCTB International) змінити ситуацію, в якій опинився наш світ. Треба якнайшвидше йти воювати. Почавши з Соціалістичної Республіки Бразилії, потім до URSAL (Союзу Соціалістичних Республік Латинської Америки) і, нарешті, до Світової Соціалістичної Республіки. І так, праві, капіталісти та неоліберали добре розбираються навіть у пропаганді та фейкових новинах, а Інтернет, соціальні мережі, ЗМІ та «перевірки фактів» це добре доводять, тому що вони майже повністю контролюються правими, капіталістами та неолібералами.

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    https://frenterevolucionariadostrabalhadores.blogspot.com/2022/05/quem-e-o-pai-da-fake-news-flavia.html?showComment=1652638107276#c2291758992219683387

  3. Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 15:21
    Joseph McCarthy era um psicopata, narcisista e doente mental, igual a outros direitistas, capitalistas e neoliberais por aí como Pinochet, Suharto, Hitler, Mussolini, Khurschev, Gorbachev, Yeltsin, George W. Bush, Margareth Thatcher, Ronald Reagan, Jair Messias Bolsonaro, Ivan Duque (Ivan Títere), a galera do r/brasilivre, FEE, TPUSA, PragerU, r/antitheistcheesecake (apesar de terem razão sobre antiteístas e ateus, são tudo um bando de direitistas, capitalistas e neoliberais), r/atheism, a comunidade de The New Order: Last Days of Europe entre outros. Direitismo, capitalismo e neoliberalismo são psicopatia, narcisismo e doenças mentais. Vamos lutar pela República Socialista Mundial e pela revolução comunista mundial, que é o que podemos fazer hoje em dia. Joseph McCarthy was a psychopath, narcissist and mentally ill, just like other rightists, capitalists and neoliberals out there like Pinochet, Suharto, Hitler, Mussolini, Khurschev, Gorbachev, Yeltsin, George W. Bush, Margareth Thatcher, Ronald Reagan, Jair Messias Bolsonaro , Ivan Duque (Ivan Títere), the r/brasilivre guys, FEE, TPUSA, PragerU, r/antitheistcheesecake (although they are right about antitheists and atheists, they are all a bunch of rightists, capitalists and neoliberals), r/atheism, The New Order: Last Days of Europe community among others. Rightism, capitalism and neoliberalism are psychopathy, narcissism and mental illness. Let’s fight for the World Socialist Republic and the communist world revolution, which is what we can do today. Joseph McCarthy era un psicópata, narcisista y enfermo mental, al igual que otros derechistas, capitalistas y neoliberales como Pinochet, Suharto, Hitler, Mussolini, Khurschev, Gorbachev, Yeltsin, George W. Bush, Margareth Thatcher, Ronald Reagan, Jair Messias Bolsonaro , Ivan Duque (Ivan Títere), los chicos de r/brasilivre, FEE, TPUSA, PragerU, r/antitheistcheesecake (si bien tienen razón en lo de antiteístas y ateos, son todos un puñado de derechistas, capitalistas y neoliberales), r/ateísmo, La comunidad New Order: Last Days of Europe, entre otros. El derechismo, el capitalismo y el neoliberalismo son psicopatía, narcisismo y enfermedad mental. Luchemos por la República Socialista Mundial y la revolución mundial comunista, que es lo que podemos hacer hoy. Joseph McCarthy était un psychopathe, un narcissique et un malade mental, tout comme d’autres droitiers, capitalistes et néolibéraux comme Pinochet, Suharto, Hitler, Mussolini, Khurschev, Gorbatchev, Eltsine, George W. Bush, Margareth Thatcher, Ronald Reagan, Jair Messias Bolsonaro , Ivan Duque (Ivan Títere), les gars de r/brasilivre, FEE, TPUSA, PragerU, r/antitheistcheesecake (bien qu’ils aient raison sur les antithéistes et les athées, ce sont tous des droitiers, des capitalistes et des néolibéraux), r/athéisme, La communauté The New Order: Last Days of Europe entre autres. Le droitisme, le capitalisme et le néolibéralisme sont la psychopathie, le narcissisme et la maladie mentale. Luttons pour la République socialiste mondiale et la révolution communiste mondiale, c’est ce que nous pouvons faire aujourd’hui.

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    Responder
    Respostas

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 15:21
    Joseph McCarthy war ein Psychopath, Narzisst und psychisch krank, genau wie andere Rechte, Kapitalisten und Neoliberale wie Pinochet, Suharto, Hitler, Mussolini, Khurschev, Gorbatschow, Jelzin, George W. Bush, Margareth Thatcher, Ronald Reagan, Jair Messias Bolsonaro , Ivan Duque (Ivan Títere), die r/brasilivre-Jungs, FEE, TPUSA, PragerU, r/antitheistcheesecake (obwohl sie mit Antitheisten und Atheisten recht haben, sind sie alle ein Haufen von Rechten, Kapitalisten und Neoliberalen), r/atheism, The New Order: Last Days of Europe Community unter anderem. Rechtsextremismus, Kapitalismus und Neoliberalismus sind Psychopathie, Narzissmus und Geisteskrankheit. Lasst uns für die Sozialistische Weltrepublik und die kommunistische Weltrevolution kämpfen, was wir heute tun können. Joseph McCarthy was een psychopaat, narcist en geestesziek, net als andere rechtsen, kapitalisten en neoliberalen zoals Pinochet, Soeharto, Hitler, Mussolini, Khurschev, Gorbatsjov, Jeltsin, George W. Bush, Margareth Thatcher, Ronald Reagan, Jair Messias Bolsonaro , Ivan Duque (Ivan Títere), de r/brasilivre-jongens, FEE, TPUSA, PragerU, r/antitheistcheesecake (hoewel ze gelijk hebben over antitheïsten en atheïsten, het zijn allemaal een stelletje rechtsen, kapitalisten en neoliberalen), r/atheïsme, The New Order: Last Days of Europe community onder anderen. Rechts, kapitalisme en neoliberalisme zijn psychopathie, narcisme en geestesziekten. Laten we vechten voor de Socialistische Wereldrepubliek en de communistische wereldrevolutie, dat is wat we vandaag kunnen doen. Joseph McCarthy era uno psicopatico, narcisista e malato di mente, proprio come altri di destra, capitalisti e neoliberisti là fuori come Pinochet, Suharto, Hitler, Mussolini, Khurschev, Gorbaciov, Eltsin, George W. Bush, Margareth Thatcher, Ronald Reagan, Jair Messias Bolsonaro , Ivan Duque (Ivan Títere), i ragazzi di r/brasilivre, FEE, TPUSA, PragerU, r/antitheistcheesecake (sebbene abbiano ragione su antiteisti e atei, sono tutti un gruppo di destra, capitalisti e neoliberisti), r/ateismo, The New Order: Last Days of Europe community, tra gli altri. Destra, capitalismo e neoliberismo sono psicopatia, narcisismo e malattia mentale. Combattiamo per la Repubblica Socialista Mondiale e la rivoluzione mondiale comunista, che è ciò che possiamo fare oggi. Joseph McCarthy ha’eva’ekue peteĩ psicópata, narcisista ha hasýva iñakãme, ambue derechista, capitalista ha neoliberal-kuéraicha okápe ha’eháicha Pinochet, Suharto, Hitler, Mussolini, Khurschev, Gorbachev, Yeltsin, George W. Bush, Margareth Thatcher, Ronald Reagan, Jair Messias Bolsonaro . Pe Orden Pyahu: Europa Ára paha komunida ambue apytépe. Rightismo, capitalismo ha neoliberalismo ha’e psicopatía, narcisismo ha mba’asy apytu’ũ rehegua. Ñañorairõ República Socialista Mundial ha revolución mundial comunista rehe, ha’éva pe ikatúva jajapo ko’ã árape.

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 15:22
    Joseph McCarthy huk psicópata, narcisista hinallataq yuyay unqusqa karqan, imaynan huk paña runakuna, kapitalistakuna hinallataq neoliberalkuna hawapi hina Pinochet, Suharto, Hitler, Mussolini, Khurschev, Gorbachev, Yeltsin, George W. Bush, Margareth Thatcher, Ronald Reagan, Jair Messias Bolsonaro hina . Musuq Kamachiy: Europap Qhipa P’unchawninkuna ayllu hukkunawan. Rightismo , capitalismo , neoliberalismo nisqakunaqa psikopatía , narcisismo nisqa , yuyay unquymi. Maqanakusun República Socialista Mundial nisqapaq, revolución mundial comunista nisqapaqpas, chaytan kunan p’unchaypi ruwayta atisunman. Joseph McCarthy jupax psicópata, narcisista ukat p’iqin usutänwa, kunjamatix yaqha derechistas, capitalistas ukat neoliberales ukanakax ukanx ukhama Pinochet, Suharto, Hitler, Mussolini, Khurschev, Gorbachev, Yeltsin, George W. Bush, Margareth Thatcher, Ronald Reagan, Jair Messias Bolsonaro . Machaq Orden: Europa markan Qhipa Urunaka comunidad yaqhanakampi. Rightismo, capitalismo ukat neoliberalismo ukax psicopatía, narcisismo ukat p’iqi usu ukanakawa. República Socialista Mundial ukat revolución mundial comunista ukatakiw ch’axwañäni, ukax jichhürunakanx luraraksnawa. Джозеф Маккарти был психопатом, нарциссом и психически больным, как и другие правые, капиталисты и неолибералы, такие как Пиночет, Сухарто, Гитлер, Муссолини, Хурщев, Горбачев, Ельцин, Джордж Буш-младший, Маргарет Тэтчер, Рональд Рейган, Жаир Мессиас Болсонару. , Иван Дуке (Иван Титере), ребята р/бразиливр, ФЕЭ, ТПУСА, ПрагерУ, р/антитеистчизкейк (хотя они правы насчет антитеистов и атеистов, они все кучка правых, капиталистов и неолибералов), р/атеизм, Сообщество New Order: Last Days of Europe и другие. Правизм, капитализм и неолиберализм — это психопатия, нарциссизм и психическое заболевание. Давайте бороться за Мировую Социалистическую Республику и коммунистическую мировую революцию, что мы и можем сделать сегодня. 约瑟夫麦卡锡是一个精神病患者、自恋者和精神病患者,就像皮诺切特、苏哈托、希特勒、墨索里尼、库尔舍夫、戈尔巴乔夫、叶利钦、乔治·W·布什、玛格丽特·撒切尔、罗纳德·里根、贾尔·梅西亚斯·博尔索纳罗等其他右翼分子、资本家和新自由主义者一样, Ivan Duque (Ivan Títere), r/brasilivre guy, FEE, TPUSA, PragerU, r/antitheistcheesecake(尽管他们对反神论者和无神论者是正确的,但他们都是一群右派、资本家和新自由主义者),r/无神论者,新秩序:欧洲社区的末日等。 右派、资本主义和新自由主义是精神病、自恋和精神疾病。 让我们为世界社会主义共和国和共产主义世界革命而战,这是我们今天能做的。

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 15:22
    ジョセフ・マッカーシーは、ピノチェット、スハルト、ヒトラー、ムッソリーニ、クルシェフ、ゴルバチョフ、エリツィン、ジョージ・W・ブッシュ、マーガレット・サッチャー、ロナルド・レーガン、ジェイル・メシアス・ボルソナロのような他の右派、無神論者、新自由主義者と同じように、サイコパス、無神論者、精神病でした、Ivan Duque(IvanTítere)、r / brasilivreの男、FEE、TPUSA、PragerU、r / antitheistcheesecake(彼らは反神論者と無神論者については正しいが、彼らはすべて権利者、資本家、新自由主義者の集まりです)、r / atheism、新しい秩序:とりわけヨーロッパの最後の日コミュニティ。 正義主義、資本主義、新自由主義は、精神病質、ナルシシズム、精神病です。 今日私たちができることである世界社会主義共和国と共産主義世界革命のために戦いましょう。 जोसेफ मैकार्थी एक मनोरोगी, संकीर्णतावादी और मानसिक रूप से बीमार थे, ठीक वैसे ही जैसे पिनोशे, सुहार्तो, हिटलर, मुसोलिनी, खुर्शेव, गोर्बाचेव, येल्तसिन, जॉर्ज डब्ल्यू बुश, मार्गरेथ थैचर, रोनाल्ड रीगन, जेयर मेसियस बोल्सोनारो जैसे अन्य दक्षिणपंथी, पूंजीपति और नवउदारवादी। , इवान ड्यूक (इवान टिटेरे), आर/ब्रासिलिव्रे लोग, एफईई, टीपीयूएसए, प्रागेरू, आर/एंटीथिस्टचेसेकेक (हालांकि वे विरोधी और नास्तिकों के बारे में सही हैं, वे सभी दक्षिणपंथियों, पूंजीपतियों और नवउदारवादियों का एक समूह हैं), आर/नास्तिक, द न्यू ऑर्डर: यूरोप समुदाय के अंतिम दिन दूसरों के बीच में। दक्षिणपंथ, पूंजीवाद और नवउदारवाद मनोरोगी, संकीर्णतावाद और मानसिक बीमारी हैं। आइए विश्व समाजवादी गणराज्य और साम्यवादी विश्व क्रांति के लिए लड़ें, जो हम आज कर सकते हैं। كان جوزيف مكارثي مختل عقليا ونرجسيًا ومصابًا بمرض عقلي ، تمامًا مثل اليمينيين والرأسماليين والنيوليبراليين الآخرين مثل بينوشيه ، وسوهارتو ، وهتلر ، وموسوليني ، وخورشوف ، وغورباتشوف ، ويلتسين ، وجورج دبليو بوش ، ومارجريت تاتشر ، ورونالد ريغان ، وجاير ميسياس بولسونارو. ، إيفان دوكي (إيفان تيتيري) ، رجال r / brasilivre ، FEE ، TPUSA ، PragerU ، r / antitheistcheesecake (على الرغم من أنهم محقون في الحديث عن مناهضين وملحدين ، فهم جميعًا مجموعة من اليمينيين والرأسماليين والنيوليبراليين) ، ص / الإلحاد ، النظام الجديد: مجتمع الأيام الأخيرة لأوروبا من بين آخرين. اليمين والرأسمالية والليبرالية الجديدة هي السيكوباتية والنرجسية والأمراض العقلية. دعونا نناضل من أجل الجمهورية الاشتراكية العالمية والثورة الشيوعية العالمية ، وهو ما يمكننا القيام به اليوم. Джозеф Маккарті був психопатом, нарцисом і психічно хворим, як і інші праві, капіталісти та неоліберали, як-от Піночет, Сухарто, Гітлер, Муссоліні, Хурщов, Горбачов, Єльцин, Джордж Буш, Маргарет Тетчер, Рональд Рейган, Джаїр Мессіас Болсонару , Іван Дуке (Іван Тітере), r/brasilivre guys, FEE, TPUSA, PragerU, r/antitheistcheesecake (хоча вони мають рацію щодо антитеїстів та атеїстів, усі вони є купою правих, капіталістів та неолібералів), r/atheism, Спільнота «Новий порядок: Останні дні Європи» серед інших. Правий, капіталізм і неолібералізм – це психопатія, нарцисизм і психічні захворювання. Давайте боротися за Світову Соціалістичну Республіку та комуністичну світову революцію, що ми можемо зробити сьогодні.

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    https://frenterevolucionariadostrabalhadores.blogspot.com/2022/05/quem-e-o-pai-da-fake-news-flavia.html?showComment=1652638892738#c8111382480614762854

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 15:34
    E sobre a última parte, a que menciona a constituição de 88. Eu já concluí que só mesmo com a Republica Socialista do Brasil, com a URSAL – União das Repúblicas Socialistas da América e com a República Socialista Mundial para mudar o nosso Brasil e mundo e dar poder total para a esquerda… E isso já está mais do que claro hoje em dia. And about the last part, the one that mentions the constitution of 88. I have already concluded that only with the Socialist Republic of Brazil, with the URSAL – Union of Socialist Republics of America and with the World Socialist Republic to change our Brazil and the world and giving full power to the left… And that is already more than clear nowadays. Y sobre la última parte, la que menciona la constitución del 88. Ya concluí que solo con la República Socialista de Brasil, con la URSAL – Unión de Repúblicas Socialistas de América y con la República Socialista Mundial para cambiar nuestro Brasil y el mundo y dando todo el poder a la izquierda… Y eso ya hoy está más que claro. Et à propos de la dernière partie, celle qui mentionne la constitution de 88. J’ai déjà conclu que seulement avec la République Socialiste du Brésil, avec l’URSAL – Union des Républiques Socialistes d’Amérique et avec la République Socialiste Mondiale pour changer notre Brésil et le monde et donner le plein pouvoir à la gauche… Et c’est déjà plus que clair aujourd’hui. Und zum letzten Teil, dem, der die Verfassung von 88 erwähnt. Ich habe bereits festgestellt, dass nur mit der Sozialistischen Republik Brasilien, mit der URSAL – Union der Sozialistischen Republiken von Amerika und mit der Sozialistischen Weltrepublik unser Brasilien und die geändert werden können Welt und gibt der Linken die volle Macht… Und das ist schon heute mehr als deutlich. En over het laatste deel, datgene dat de grondwet van 88 vermeldt. Ik heb al geconcludeerd dat alleen met de Socialistische Republiek Brazilië, met de URSAL – Unie van Socialistische Republieken van Amerika en met de Wereld Socialistische Republiek om ons Brazilië en de wereld en links de volle macht geven… En dat is vandaag al meer dan duidelijk.

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    Responder
    Respostas

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 15:34
    E dell’ultima parte, quella che cita la costituzione dell’88. Ho già concluso che solo con la Repubblica Socialista del Brasile, con l’URSAL – Unione delle Repubbliche Socialiste d’America e con la Repubblica Socialista Mondiale per cambiare il nostro Brasile e il mondo e dare pieno potere alla sinistra… E questo è già più che chiaro oggi. Ha pe parte paha rehegua, pe imandu’ava constitución 88. Amohu’ãma República Socialista Brasil ndive añoite, URSAL – Unión de Repúblicas Socialistas de América ndive ha República Socialista Mundial ndive omoambue haguã ñande Brasil ha pe mundo ha ome’êvo pleno poder izquierda-pe… Ha upéva hesakãvéma ko’ã árape. Y sobre la última parte, la que menciona la constitución de 88. Ñam tukurqaniña chaylla República Socialista de Brasilwan, URSALwan – Unión de Repúblicas Socialistas de Américawan chaynallataq República Socialista Mundialwan Brasilninchikta tikranapaq hinaspa chay pachata hinallataq lloq’eman hunt’asqa atiyta qospa… Hinaspa chayqa kunan p’unchaykunapiqa aswan sut’inñan. Ukatxa niya qhipa t’aqatxa, khititix arsuski constitución de 88. Nayax nayraqatw tukuyta, ukakiw República Socialista de Brasil ukampi, URSAL – Unión de Repúblicas Socialistas de América ukampi ukat República Socialista Mundial ukampix jiwasan Brasil ukat uka uraqpachan ukat ch’iqa tuqir taqpach ch’ama churaña… Ukat ukax jichhürunakanx niyaw juk’amp qhana. А по поводу последней части, той, где упоминается конституция 88 года. Я уже сделал вывод, что только с Социалистической Республикой Бразилия, с УРСАЛом – Союзом Социалистических Республик Америки и с Мировой Социалистической Республикой изменить нашу Бразилию и мир и отдать всю власть левым… И это уже сегодня более чем ясно.

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 15:35
    关于最后一部分,提到了 88 宪法。我已经得出结论,只有与巴西社会主义共和国、美国社会主义共和国联盟和世界社会主义共和国一起改变我们的巴西和世界并向左派全力以赴……这在今天已经很清楚了。そして最後の部分については、88の憲法に言及している部分です。私はすでに、ブラジル社会主義共和国、URSAL-アメリカ社会主義共和国連合、そして世界社会主義共和国との間でのみ、ブラジルと世界と左に全力を与える…そしてそれは今日すでに明らか以上のものです。और आखिरी भाग के बारे में, जिसमें 88 के संविधान का उल्लेख है। मैं पहले ही निष्कर्ष निकाल चुका हूं कि केवल ब्राजील के समाजवादी गणराज्य के साथ, यूआरएसएएल के साथ – अमेरिका के समाजवादी गणराज्य संघ और विश्व समाजवादी गणराज्य के साथ हमारे ब्राजील को बदलने के लिए और दुनिया और पूरी ताकत वामपंथ को दे रही है… और यह आज पहले से कहीं अधिक स्पष्ट है। وحول الجزء الأخير ، الجزء الذي يذكر دستور 88. لقد استنتجت بالفعل أنه فقط مع جمهورية البرازيل الاشتراكية ، مع URSAL – اتحاد الجمهوريات الاشتراكية الأمريكية ومع الجمهورية الاشتراكية العالمية لتغيير بلدنا البرازيل و العالم وإعطاء القوة الكاملة لليسار … وهذا واضح بالفعل اليوم. І про останню частину, ту, де згадується конституція 88 року. Я вже зробив висновок, що тільки з Соціалістичною Республікою Бразилія, з URSAL – Союзом Соціалістичних Республік Америки і зі Світовою Соціалістичною Республікою змінити нашу Бразилію і світ і віддаючи повну владу ліворуч… І це вже сьогодні більш ніж зрозуміло.

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    https://frenterevolucionariadostrabalhadores.blogspot.com/2022/05/quem-e-o-pai-da-fake-news-flavia.html?showComment=1652639667441#c616733849954172776

  4. Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 16:48
    William Ariel Mounter15 de maio de 2022 16:46
    O próprio capitalismo, neoliberalismo, direitismo e democracia liberal são antidemocráticos. Só mesmo com a República Socialista Mundial (FRT-PCTB Internacional) para termos uma democracia direta, socialista e plena. Assim como que com a República Socialista Mundial (FRT-PCTB Internacional) teremos uma Cuba verdadeiramente livre e comunista.

    Capitalism, neoliberalism, rightism and liberal democracy themselves are undemocratic. Only with the World Socialist Republic (FRT-PCTB International) to have a direct, socialist and full democracy. Just as with the World Socialist Republic (FRT-PCTB International) we will have a truly free and communist Cuba.

    El capitalismo, el neoliberalismo, el derechismo y la democracia liberal en sí mismos son antidemocráticos. Sólo con la República Socialista Mundial (FRT-PCTB Internacional) para tener una democracia directa, socialista y plena. Así como con la República Socialista Mundial (FRT-PCTB Internacional) tendremos una Cuba verdaderamente libre y comunista.

    Le capitalisme, le néolibéralisme, le droitisme et la démocratie libérale eux-mêmes sont antidémocratiques. Il n’y a qu’avec la République Socialiste Mondiale (FRT-PCTB International) pour avoir une démocratie directe, socialiste et pleine. Tout comme avec la République socialiste mondiale (FRT-PCTB International), nous aurons un Cuba vraiment libre et communiste.

    Kapitalismus, Neoliberalismus, Rechtsextremismus und die liberale Demokratie selbst sind undemokratisch. Nur mit der Sozialistischen Weltrepublik (FRT-PCTB International) eine direkte, sozialistische und vollständige Demokratie. Genau wie bei der Sozialistischen Weltrepublik (FRT-PCTB International) werden wir ein wirklich freies und kommunistisches Kuba haben.

    Kapitalisme, neoliberalisme, rechts en liberale democratie zelf zijn ondemocratisch. Alleen met de World Socialist Republic (FRT-PCTB International) om een ​​directe, socialistische en volledige democratie te hebben. Net als met de World Socialist Republic (FRT-PCTB International) zullen we een echt vrij en communistisch Cuba hebben.

    Il capitalismo, il neoliberismo, la destra e la democrazia liberale sono di per sé antidemocratici. Solo con la Repubblica Socialista Mondiale (FRT-PCTB International) per avere una democrazia diretta, socialista e piena. Proprio come con la Repubblica Socialista Mondiale (FRT-PCTB International) avremo una Cuba veramente libera e comunista.

    Капитализм, неолиберализм, правые и либеральная демократия сами по себе недемократичны. Только с Мировой Социалистической Республикой (FRT-PCTB International) иметь прямую, социалистическую и полную демократию. Как и в случае с Мировой Социалистической Республикой (FRT-PCTB International), у нас будет действительно свободная и коммунистическая Куба.

    资本主义、新自由主义、右翼主义和自由民主主义本身就是不民主的。 只有与世界社会主义共和国(FRT-PCTB International)建立直接的、社会主义的和充分的民主。 就像世界社会主义共和国(FRT-PCTB International)一样,我们将拥有一个真正自由和共产主义的古巴。

    https://pcrtbrasil.blogspot.com/2022/05/o-que-e-antidemocratico-e-que-os-eua.html?showComment=1652643992392#c6057912997133361440

    Responder
    Respostas

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 16:49
    William Ariel Mounter15 de maio de 2022 16:48
    الرأسمالية والنيوليبرالية واليمينية والديمقراطية الليبرالية نفسها غير ديمقراطية. فقط مع الجمهورية الاشتراكية العالمية (FRT-PCTB International) لتكون لديها ديمقراطية مباشرة واشتراكية وكاملة. تمامًا كما هو الحال مع الجمهورية الاشتراكية العالمية (FRT-PCTB International) ، سيكون لدينا حقًا كوبا حرة وشيوعية.

    पूंजीवाद, नवउदारवाद, दक्षिणपंथ और उदार लोकतंत्र स्वयं अलोकतांत्रिक हैं। केवल विश्व समाजवादी गणराज्य (FRT-PCTB इंटरनेशनल) के पास प्रत्यक्ष, समाजवादी और पूर्ण लोकतंत्र है। जिस तरह वर्ल्ड सोशलिस्ट रिपब्लिक (FRT-PCTB इंटरनेशनल) के साथ हमारे पास वास्तव में एक स्वतंत्र और कम्युनिस्ट क्यूबा होगा।

    資本主義、新自由主義、正義主義、そして自由民主主義それ自体は非民主的です。 世界社会主義共和国(FRT-PCTBインターナショナル)とのみ、直接的な社会主義的で完全な民主主義を持っています。 世界社会主義共和国(FRT-PCTBインターナショナル)と同じように、私たちは真に自由で共産主義のキューバを手に入れるでしょう。

    Капіталізм, неолібералізм, правий та ліберальна демократія самі по собі недемократичні. Тільки зі Світовою Соціалістичною Республікою (FRT-PCTB International) матиме пряму, соціалістичну і повну демократію. Так само, як і зі Світовою Соціалістичною Республікою (FRT-PCTB International), ми матимемо справді вільну і комуністичну Кубу.

    Capitalismo, neoliberalismo, derecho ha democracia liberal ijeheguiete ha’e antidemocrático. República Socialista Mundial (FRT-PCTB Internacional) ndive añoite oguereko haguã democracia directa, socialista ha plena. Péicha avei República Socialista Mundial (FRT-PCTB Internacional) ndive jaguerekóta peteî Cuba añetehápe isãso ha comunista.

    Kikin kapitalismu , neoliberalismo , derecha nisqa , liberal democracia nisqa kamachiypas mana dimukratikuyuqmi. República Socialista Mundial (FRT-PCTB Internacional) nisqawanlla chiqan, socialista, hunt’asqa democracia nisqayuq kananpaq. Imaynan República Socialista Mundial (FRT-PCTB Internacional) nisqawanpas cheqaq libre, comunista Cuba nisqayoq kasun.

    Capitalismo, neoliberalismo, derecho ukat liberal democracia ukax pachpa jan democrático ukhamawa. República Socialista Mundial (FRT-PCTB Internacional) ukampikiw mä democracia directa, socialista ukat phuqhat utjañapataki. Kunjamakitix República Socialista Mundial (FRT-PCTB Internacional) ukax chiqpachan qhispiyat ukhamarak comunista Cuba markaruw puriñäni.

    https://pcrtbrasil.blogspot.com/2022/05/o-que-e-antidemocratico-e-que-os-eua.html?showComment=1652644093083#c917441516216666694

    Responder

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 16:54
    William Ariel Mounter15 de maio de 2022 16:50
    A OTAN é fascista, assim como o próprio capitalismo, neoliberalismo, direitismo, libetarianismo, anarcocapitalismo, objetivismo randiano, individualismo, neopositivismo, antiteísmo, anticomunismo,antissocialismo e antiesquerdismo são sim formas de fascismo. Só mesmo com a República Socialista Mundial (FRT-PCTB Internacional) para termos um mundo sem fascismo, e sem capitalismo, neoliberalismo, direitismo, libetarianismo, anarcocapitalismo, objetivismo randiano, individualismo, neopositivismo, antiteísmo, anticomunismo,antissocialismo e antiesquerdismo.

    NATO is fascist, just as capitalism itself, neoliberalism, rightism, libertarianism, anarchocapitalism, Randian objectivism, individualism, neopositivism, antitheism, anticommunism, antisocialism and antileftism are all forms of fascism. Only with the World Socialist Republic (FRT-PCTB International) to have a world without fascism, and without capitalism, neoliberalism, rightism, libertarianism, anarchocapitalism, Randian objectivism, individualism, neopositivism, antitheism, anticommunism, antisocialism and antileftism.

    La OTAN es fascista, así como el capitalismo mismo, el neoliberalismo, el derechismo, el libertarismo, el anarcocapitalismo, el objetivismo randiano, el individualismo, el neopositivismo, el antiteísmo, el anticomunismo, el antisocialismo y el antiizquierdismo son todas formas de fascismo. Solo con la República Socialista Mundial (FRT-PCTB Internacional) para tener un mundo sin fascismo, y sin capitalismo, neoliberalismo, derechismo, libertarismo, anarcocapitalismo, objetivismo randiano, individualismo, neopositivismo, antiteísmo, anticomunismo, antisocialismo y antiizquierdismo.

    L’OTAN est fasciste, tout comme le capitalisme lui-même, le néolibéralisme, le droitisme, le libertarianisme, l’anarchocapitalisme, l’objectivisme randien, l’individualisme, le néopositivisme, l’antithéisme, l’anticommunisme, l’antisocialisme et l’antigauchisme sont toutes des formes de fascisme. Seulement avec la République socialiste mondiale (FRT-PCTB International) pour avoir un monde sans fascisme, et sans capitalisme, néolibéralisme, droitisme, libertarianisme, anarchocapitalisme, objectivisme randien, individualisme, néopositivisme, antithéisme, anticommunisme, antisocialisme et antigauchisme.

    https://pcrtbrasil.blogspot.com/2022/05/a-historia-fascista-da-otan-tim.html?showComment=1652644251987#c724663242558908615

    Responder
    Respostas

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 16:54
    Die NATO ist faschistisch, genauso wie der Kapitalismus selbst, Neoliberalismus, Rechtsextremismus, Libertarismus, Anarchokapitalismus, Randianischer Objektivismus, Individualismus, Neopositivismus, Antitheismus, Antikommunismus, Antisozialismus und Antilinkismus alle Formen des Faschismus sind. Nur mit der Sozialistischen Weltrepublik (FRT-PCTB International), um eine Welt ohne Faschismus und ohne Kapitalismus, Neoliberalismus, Rechten, Libertarismus, Anarchokapitalismus, Randianischen Objektivismus, Individualismus, Neopositivismus, Antitheismus, Antikommunismus, Antisozialismus und Antilinkismus zu haben.

    De NAVO is fascistisch, net zoals het kapitalisme zelf, neoliberalisme, rechtsisme, libertarisme, anarchokapitalisme, Randiaans objectivisme, individualisme, neopositivisme, antitheïsme, anticommunisme, antisocialisme en antilinksisme allemaal vormen van fascisme zijn. Alleen met de World Socialist Republic (FRT-PCTB International) om een ​​wereld te hebben zonder fascisme, en zonder kapitalisme, neoliberalisme, rechtsisme, libertarisme, anarchokapitalisme, Randiaans objectivisme, individualisme, neopositivisme, antitheïsme, anticommunisme, antisocialisme en antilinksisme.

    La NATO è fascista, proprio come il capitalismo stesso, il neoliberismo, il destrismo, il libertarismo, l’anarcocapitalismo, l’oggettivismo randiano, l’individualismo, il neopositivismo, l’antiteismo, l’anticomunismo, l’antisocialismo e l’antisinistra sono tutte forme di fascismo. Solo con la Repubblica Socialista Mondiale (FRT-PCTB International) per avere un mondo senza fascismo, e senza capitalismo, neoliberismo, destra, libertarismo, anarcocapitalismo, oggettivismo randiano, individualismo, neopositivismo, antiteismo, anticomunismo, antisocialismo e antisinistra.

    https://pcrtbrasil.blogspot.com/2022/05/a-historia-fascista-da-otan-tim.html?showComment=1652644251987#c724663242558908615

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 16:55
    William Ariel Mounter15 de maio de 2022 16:53
    НАТО является фашистским, как и сам капитализм, неолиберализм, правизм, либертарианство, анархо-капитализм, рандовский объективизм, индивидуализм, неопозитивизм, антитеизм, антикоммунизм, антисоциализм и антилевизна — все это формы фашизма. Только с Мировой Социалистической Республикой (FRT-PCTB International) будет мир без фашизма и без капитализма, неолиберализма, правизма, либертарианства, анархокапитализма, рэндианского объективизма, индивидуализма, неопозитивизма, антитеизма, антикоммунизма, антисоциализма и антилевизны.

    北约是法西斯主义,正如资本主义本身,新自由主义、右翼主义、自由主义、无政府资本主义、兰迪客观主义、个人主义、新实证主义、反神主义、反共产主义、反社会主义和反左主义都是法西斯主义的形式。 只有建立了世界社会主义共和国(FRT-PCTB International),才能拥有一个没有法西斯主义、没有资本主义、新自由主义、右翼主义、自由主义、无政府资本主义、燃点客观主义、个人主义、新实证主义、反神主义、反共产主义、反社会主义和反左主义的世界。

    NATOはファシストであり、資本主義自体、新自由主義、正義主義、リバタリアニズム、無政府資本主義、ランディアンの客観主義、個人主義、新自由主義、反神主義、反共主義、反社会主義、反左主義がすべてファシズムの形態であるように。 世界社会主義共和国(FRT-PCTBインターナショナル)だけが、ファシズム、資本主義、新自由主義、正義、リバタリアニズム、無政府資本主義、ランディアンの客観主義、個人主義、新自由主義、反神主義、反共主義、反社会主義、反左主義のない世界を持っています。

    إن الناتو فاشي ، تمامًا مثل الرأسمالية نفسها ، والنيوليبرالية ، واليمينية ، والليبرتارية ، والرأسمالية اللاسلطوية ، والموضوعية الراندي ، والفردية ، والوضعية الجديدة ، ومعاداة الآلهة ، ومعاداة الشيوعية ، ومعاداة الاشتراكية ، ومعاداة اليسار ، كلها أشكال من الفاشية. فقط مع الجمهورية الاشتراكية العالمية (FRT-PCTB International) ليكون لديها عالم خالٍ من الفاشية ، وبدون رأسمالية ، والنيوليبرالية ، واليمين ، والليبرالية ، والرأسمالية اللاسلطوية ، والموضوعية الراندية ، والفردية ، والوضعية الجديدة ، ومعاداة الإله ، ومعاداة الشيوعية ، ومعاداة الاشتراكية ، ومعاداة اليسار.

    https://pcrtbrasil.blogspot.com/2022/05/a-historia-fascista-da-otan-tim.html?showComment=1652644382817#c6454641609285770201

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 16:55
    William Ariel Mounter15 de maio de 2022 16:53
    नाटो फासीवादी है, जैसे कि पूंजीवाद ही, नवउदारवाद, दक्षिणपंथीवाद, उदारवाद, अराजकतावाद, रैंडियन वस्तुवाद, व्यक्तिवाद, नवपोषवाद, विरोधीवाद, साम्यवाद, असामाजिकवाद और विरोधीवाद सभी फासीवाद के रूप हैं। केवल विश्व समाजवादी गणराज्य (एफआरटी-पीसीटीबी इंटरनेशनल) के पास फासीवाद के बिना, और पूंजीवाद के बिना, नवउदारवाद, दक्षिणपंथ, उदारवाद, अराजकतावाद, रैंडियन वस्तुवाद, व्यक्तिवाद, नवपोषवाद, विरोधीवाद, साम्यवाद, असामाजिकता और विरोधीवाद के बिना दुनिया है।

    НАТО є фашистським, так само як і сам капіталізм, неолібералізм, правий, лібертаріанство, анаркокапіталізм, рандіанський об’єктивізм, індивідуалізм, неопозитивізм, антитеїзм, антикомунізм, антисоціалізм і антилівість — усі форми фашизму. Тільки зі Світовою Соціалістичною Республікою (FRT-PCTB International) матиме світ без фашизму, і без капіталізму, неолібералізму, правого, лібертаріанства, анаркокапіталізму, рандіанського об’єктивізму, індивідуалізму, неопозитивізму, антитеїзму, антикомунізму, антисоціалізму та антилівості.

    OTAN ha’e fascista, péicha avei capitalismo voi, neoliberalismo, derechista, libertarianismo, anarcocapitalismo, objetivismo randiano, individualismo, neopositivismo, antiteísmo, anticomunismo, antisocialismo ha antiizquierdista ha’e opaichagua fascismo. República Socialista Mundial (FRT-PCTB Internacional) ndive añoite oguereko haguã peteĩ mundo ndorekóiva fascismo, ha ndorekóiva capitalismo, neoliberalismo, derecho, libertarianismo, anarcocapitalismo, objetivismo randiano, individualismo, neopositivismo, antiteísmo, anticomunismo, antisocialismo ha antiizquierdista.

    OTAN nisqaqa fascistam, imaynam kikin kapitalismu, neoliberalismo, paña, libertarianismo, anarcocapitalismo, objetivismo randiano, individualismo, neopositivismo, antiteísmo, anticomunismo, antisocialismo, antileftismo nisqa tukuy rikch’aq fascismo nisqa. Republika Socialista Mundial (FRT-PCTB Internacional) nisqawanlla, mana fascismoyuq pachayuq kananpaq, mana kapitalismuyuq, neoliberalismoyuq, pañayuq, libertarianismoyuq, anarcocapitalismoyuq, randiano objetivismoyuq, individualismoyuq, neopositivismoyuq, antiteismoyuq, anticomunismoyuq, antisocialismoyuq, antileftismoyuq pachayuq kananpaq.

    OTAN ukax fascista ukhamawa, kunjamatix capitalismo pachpa, neoliberalismo, derecho, libertarianismo, anarcocapitalismo, objetivismo randiano, individualismo, neopositivismo, antiteísmo, anticomunismo, antisocialismo ukat antiizquierdista ukanakax taqi kasta fascismo ukanakawa. República Socialista Mundial (FRT-PCTB Internacional) ukampikiw mä uraq jan fascismo ukan utjañapataki, ukat jan capitalismo, neoliberalismo, derecho, libertarianismo, anarcocapitalismo, objetivismo randiano, individualismo, neopositivismo, antiteísmo, anticomunismo, antisocialismo ukat antiizquierdista ukanakamp utjañapataki.

    https://pcrtbrasil.blogspot.com/2022/05/a-historia-fascista-da-otan-tim.html?showComment=1652644394284#c8067160509520648744

    https://frenterevolucionariadostrabalhadores.blogspot.com/2022/05/quem-e-o-pai-da-fake-news-flavia.html?showComment=1652644130737#c899749562622902095

  5. Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:23
    Direitistas são psicopatas mesmo. O direitismo é um mal que assola a humanidade. O direitismo é sinônimo de psicopatia, narcisismo, doença mental, psicose e insanidade. O direitismo possui diversos ramos e faces, como o capitalismo, neoliberalismo, liberalismo, individualismo, fascismo, nacionalismo de direita, nazismo, libertarianismo, anarcocapitalismo, objetivismo randiano, neopositivismo, positivismo, cientificismo, antiteísmo, kratosismo, deicidismo, teoespecismo, transumanismo clássico, microchipismo, anticomunismo, antissocialismo, antiesquerdismo entre outros. O direitismo é um dos piores males que assolam a humanidade e o mundo em que vivemos. E o direitismo está em todos os lugares… Na Internet, nas mídias sociais, na mídia de massa, na cultura popular, na “ciência”, na tecnologia, na política, na economia… Todos os direitistas são psicopatas, narcisistas, doentes mentais, psicóticos e insanos. Devemos lutar contra o direitismo e criar um mundo completamente de esquerda e feito para as esquerdas. Precisamos criar a República Socialista Mundial. Assim como devemos executar todos os direitistas que existem no mundo, já que eles falam tanto que “o único comunista bom é um comunista morto” ou mesmo “enfoque todos os comunistas, então respondemos eles falando “o único direitista bom é um direitista morto” e “enfoque todos os direitistas”, vamos fazer eles provarem o que eles querem fazer com nós, e vamos tornar o nosso sonho esquerdista, socialista e comunista em realidade. A República Socialista Mundial é o nosso dever e o nosso objetivo como esquerdistas, socialistas e comunistas.

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    Responder
    Respostas

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:23
    Los derechistas son psicópatas. El derechismo es un mal que azota a la humanidad. El derechismo es sinónimo de psicopatía, narcisismo, enfermedad mental, psicosis y locura. El derechismo tiene varias ramas y rostros, como el capitalismo, el neoliberalismo, el liberalismo, el individualismo, el fascismo, el nacionalismo de derecha, el nazismo, el libertarismo, el anarcocapitalismo, el objetivismo randiano, el neopositivismo, el positivismo, el cientificismo, el antiteísmo, el kratosismo, el deicidismo, el teoespecismo, el transhumanismo, microchipismo, anticomunismo, antisocialismo, antiizquierdismo, entre otros. El derechismo es uno de los peores males que azotan a la humanidad y al mundo en que vivimos. Y el derechismo está en todas partes… En Internet, las redes sociales, los medios de comunicación, la cultura popular, la “ciencia”, la tecnología, la política, la economía… Todos los derechistas son psicópatas, narcisistas, enfermos mentales, psicóticos y dementes. Debemos luchar contra el derechismo y crear un mundo completamente de izquierda y hecho para la izquierda. Necesitamos crear la República Socialista Mundial. Así como deberíamos ejecutar a todos los derechistas que hay en el mundo, ya que tanto hablan de que “el único comunista bueno es un comunista muerto” o incluso “centrarse en todos los comunistas”, así les respondemos diciendo “el único derechista bueno es un absolutamente correcto” y “enfocar a todos los derechistas”, hagamos que demuestren lo que quieren hacer con nosotros, y hagamos realidad nuestro sueño izquierdista, socialista y comunista. La República Socialista Mundial es nuestro deber y nuestra meta como izquierdistas, socialistas y comunistas

    Guilherme Monteiro Júnior

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:23
    Les gens de droite sont des psychopathes. Le droitisme est un mal qui afflige l’humanité. Le droitisme est synonyme de psychopathie, de narcissisme, de maladie mentale, de psychose et de folie. Le droitisme a plusieurs branches et visages, tels que le capitalisme, le néolibéralisme, le libéralisme, l’individualisme, le fascisme, le nationalisme de droite, le nazisme, le libertarianisme, l’anarcho-capitalisme, l’objectivisme randien, le néopositivisme, le positivisme, le scientisme, l’antithéisme, le kratosisme, le déicidisme, le théospécisme, le classique transhumanisme, microchipisme, anti-communisme, anti-socialisme, anti-gauchisme, entre autres. Le droitisme est l’un des pires maux qui affligent l’humanité et le monde dans lequel nous vivons. Et le droitisme est partout… Sur Internet, les réseaux sociaux, les médias de masse, la culture populaire, la “science”, la technologie, la politique, l’économie… Tous les droitiers sont des psychopathes, des narcissiques, des malades mentaux, des psychotiques et des fous. Nous devons lutter contre le droitisme et créer un monde complètement à gauche et fait pour la gauche. Nous devons créer la République socialiste mondiale. De même qu’il faudrait exécuter tous les droitiers qui existent dans le monde, puisqu’ils disent tellement que “le seul bon communiste est un communiste mort” ou même “se focaliser sur tous les communistes, alors on leur répond en disant “le seul bon droitier est un droite morte” et “concentrons tous les droitiers”, faisons-leur prouver ce qu’ils veulent faire de nous, et réalisons notre rêve de gauche, socialiste et communiste. La République socialiste mondiale est notre devoir et notre objectif en tant que gauchistes, socialistes et communistes.

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:24
    Rechte sind Psychopathen. Rechtsextremismus ist ein Übel, das die Menschheit plagt. Rechtschaffenheit ist gleichbedeutend mit Psychopathie, Narzissmus, Geisteskrankheit, Psychose und Wahnsinn. Der Rechtsismus hat mehrere Zweige und Gesichter, wie Kapitalismus, Neoliberalismus, Liberalismus, Individualismus, Faschismus, rechtsgerichteter Nationalismus, Nazismus, Libertarismus, Anarchokapitalismus, Randianischer Objektivismus, Neopositivismus, Positivismus, Szientismus, Antitheismus, Kratosismus, Deizidismus, Theospeziesismus, Klassik Transhumanismus, Mikrochipismus, Antikommunismus, Antisozialismus, Antilinkismus, unter anderem. Rechtsextremismus ist eines der schlimmsten Übel, das die Menschheit und die Welt, in der wir leben, plagt. Und Rechtsextremismus ist überall… Im Internet, Social Media, Massenmedien, Populärkultur, “Wissenschaft”, Technik, Politik, Wirtschaft… Alle Rechten sind Psychopathen, Narzissten, Geisteskranke, Psychotiker und Wahnsinnige. Wir müssen gegen die Rechte kämpfen und eine Welt schaffen, die komplett links und für die Linke gemacht ist. Wir müssen die Sozialistische Weltrepublik schaffen. Genauso wie wir alle Rechten, die es auf der Welt gibt, hinrichten sollten, da sie so viel reden, dass „der einzige gute Kommunist ein toter Kommunist ist“ oder sogar „sich auf alle Kommunisten konzentriert“, so antworten wir ihnen und sagen: „Der einzig gute Rechte ist ein tot rechts“ und „fokussiert alle Rechten“, lasst sie uns beweisen, was sie mit uns machen wollen, und lasst uns unseren linken, sozialistischen und kommunistischen Traum wahr werden lassen. Die Sozialistische Weltrepublik ist unsere Pflicht und unser Ziel als Linke, Sozialisten u Kommunisten.

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:24
    Rechts zijn psychopaten. Rechts is een kwaad dat de mensheid plaagt. Rechts is synoniem met psychopathie, narcisme, geestesziekte, psychose en waanzin. Rechts heeft verschillende takken en gezichten, zoals kapitalisme, neoliberalisme, liberalisme, individualisme, fascisme, rechts nationalisme, nazisme, libertarisme, anarcho-kapitalisme, Randiaans objectivisme, neopositivisme, positivisme, sciëntisme, antitheïsme, kratosisme, deïcidisme, theospeciesisme, klassiek transhumanisme, microchipisme, anti-communisme, anti-socialisme, anti-links, onder anderen. Rechts is een van de ergste kwaden die de mensheid en de wereld waarin we leven teisteren. En rechts is overal… Op internet, sociale media, massamedia, populaire cultuur, “wetenschap”, technologie, politiek, economie… Alle rechtsen zijn psychopaten, narcisten, geesteszieken, psychotische en krankzinnigen. We moeten vechten tegen het rechtse en een wereld creëren die volledig links is en gemaakt is voor links. We moeten de Socialistische Wereldrepubliek creëren. Net zoals we alle rechtse mensen in de wereld zouden moeten executeren, omdat ze zoveel praten dat “de enige goede communist een dode communist is” of zelfs “zich richten op alle communisten, zo antwoorden we hen met de woorden “de enige goede rechtse is een doodrechts” en “focus alle rechtsen”, laten we ze laten bewijzen wat ze met ons willen doen, en laten we onze linkse, socialistische en communistische droom waarmaken. De Socialistische Wereldrepubliek is onze plicht en ons doel als linksen, socialisten en communisten.

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:24
    La destra è psicopatica. La destra è un male che affligge l’umanità. Destra è sinonimo di psicopatia, narcisismo, malattia mentale, psicosi e follia. La destra ha diversi rami e volti, come il capitalismo, il neoliberismo, il liberalismo, l’individualismo, il fascismo, il nazionalismo di destra, il nazismo, il libertarismo, l’anarco-capitalismo, l’oggettivismo randiano, il neopositivismo, il positivismo, lo scientismo, l’antiteismo, il kratosismo, il deicidismo, il teospecismo, il classico transumanesimo, microchipismo, anticomunismo, antisocialismo, anti-sinistra, tra gli altri. La destra è uno dei peggiori mali che affliggono l’umanità e il mondo in cui viviamo. E la destra è ovunque… Su Internet, i social media, i mass media, la cultura popolare, la “scienza”, la tecnologia, la politica, l’economia… Tutti i destri sono psicopatici, narcisisti, malati di mente, psicotici e pazzi. Dobbiamo combattere contro la destra e creare un mondo che sia completamente di sinistra e fatto per la sinistra. Dobbiamo creare la Repubblica Socialista Mondiale. Proprio come dovremmo giustiziare tutti i militanti di destra che esistono nel mondo, dal momento che parlano così tanto che “l’unico comunista buono è un comunista morto” o addirittura “concentrarsi su tutti i comunisti, così rispondiamo loro dicendo “l’unico buon comunista è un assolutamente a destra” e “concentrare tutti i destri”, facciamo loro dimostrare cosa vogliono fare con noi, e realizziamo il nostro sogno di sinistra, socialista e comunista. La Repubblica Socialista Mondiale è il nostro dovere e il nostro obiettivo di sinistra, socialisti e comunisti.

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:25
    Umi derechista ha’e psicópata. Pe derecho ha’e peteĩ mba’evai ombohasa asýva yvypórape. Rightismo ha’e sinónimo psicopatía, narcisismo, mba’asy mental, psicosis ha locura. Derechosmo oguereko heta hakã ha hova, ha’eháicha capitalismo, neoliberalismo, liberalismo, individualismo, fascismo, nacionalismo derecha, nazismo, libertarianismo, anarco-capitalismo, objetivismo randiano, neopositivismo, positivismo, científico, antiteísmo, kratosismo, deicidismo, teoespeciesismo, clásico transhumanismo, microchipismo, anticomunismo, antisocialismo, antiizquierdista, ambue apytépe. Pe derecho ha’e peteĩ mba’evai ivaivéva ombohasa asýva yvypórape ha ko mundo jaikohápe. Ha derechoismo oî oparupiete… Internet-pe, medios sociales, medios masivos, cultura popular, “ciencia”, tecnología, política, economía… Mayma derechista ha’e psicópata, narcisista , hasýva mental, psicótico ha loco. Ñañorairõva’erã derechoismo rehe ha jajapo peteî mundo oîva completamente izquierda ha ojejapóva izquierda-pe guarã. Tekotevê ñamoheñói República Socialista Mundial. Péicha avei jajejuka va’erã opavave derechista oîva ko mundo-pe, oñe’êtereígui hikuái “pe comunista iporâva añoite ha’e peteî comunista omanóva” térâ jepe “ojesareko opavave comunista rehe, upéicha ñambohovái chupekuéra ja’évo “pe derechista único iporâva ha’e peteî”. omanóva derecha” ha “enfoque todos los derechistas”, jajapo chupekuéra ohechauka haguã mba’épa ojapose ñanendive, ha jajapo ñande kerayvoty izquierdista, socialista ha comunista.La República Mundial Socialista ha’e ñande deber ha ñane rembipota izquierdista, socialista ha… comunista-kuéra rehegua.

    Guilherme Monteiro Ñemby Ñemuha

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:25
    Paña kaq runakunaqa psicópatas nisqakunam. Chiqan kayqa runata ñak’arichiq millaymi. Rightismo nisqaqa psicopatía , narcisismo , yuyay unquy , psicosis , locura nisqakunawanmi hukllachasqa kachkan. Paña-kapitalismoqa achka k’allmayuqmi, uyayuqmi, ahinataq kapitalismu , neoliberalismo , liberalismo , individualismo , fascismo , paña mama llaqtayuq , nazismo , libertarianismo , anarco-capitalismo , randian objetivismo , neopositivismo , positivismo , cientifico , antiteismo , kratosismo , deicidismo , teospeciesismo , klasiku transhumanismo, microchipismo, anticomunismo, antisocialismo, anti-izquierdista, hukkunapas. Rightismo nisqaqa huk aswan millay millaymi runakunata, kay pachapi kawsasqanchiktapas ñak’arichiq. Hinaspa derechoismoqa tukuy hinantinpim kachkan… Internetpi, medios sociales nisqapi, medios masivos nisqapi, cultura popular nisqapi, “ciencia”, tecnología nisqapi, política nisqapi, economía nisqapi… Llapan derecho nisqa runakunaqa psicópatas, narcisistas , yuyay unquqkunam, psicóticos hinaspa locos nisqakunam. Derecha nisqa kamachikuywanmi maqanakunanchis, hinallataqmi huk pachata paqarichinanchis, llapan lloq’e kananpaq, lloq’epaq ruwasqa. República Socialista Mundial nisqatam kamananchik. Imaynan kay pachapi kaq llapa paña runakunata wañuchinanchis, chay hinallataqmi anchata rimanku “allin comunistalla wañusqa comunista” nispa otaq “llapa comunistakunapipas yuyaykunku, chay hinatan paykunaman kutichinchis “allin paña kaqllaqa a” nispa wañusqa derecho” y “enfocar a todos los derechas”, haku paykuna pruebanankupaq imatachus ruwayta munanku ñuqaykuwan, hinallataq ruwasun lloq’e, socialista, comunista musquyninchikta. La República Mundial Socialista es nuestro deber y nuestra meta como izquierdistas, socialistas y comunistakuna.

    Guilherme Monteiro sutiyuq runam

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:25
    Derecha ukankirinakax psicópatas ukanakawa. Rightismo ukax mä jan waliwa, ukax jaqinakarux t’aqhisiyaraki. Rightismo ukax psicopatía, narcisismo, p’iqi usu, psicosis ukat locura ukanakamp sinónimo ukhamawa. Rightismo ukax walja ramanakaniwa, uñnaqanirakiwa, capitalismo, neoliberalismo, liberalismo, individualismo, fascismo, nacionalismo derecha, nazismo, libertarianismo, anarco-capitalismo, objetivismo randiano, neopositivismo, positivismo, científico, antiteísmo, kratosismo, deicidismo, teoespeciesismo, clásico transhumanismo, microchipismo, anticomunismo, antisocialismo, antiizquierdista, ukat yaqhanakampi. Rightismo ukax mä jan wali jan waliw jaqinakaru ukhamarak akapachan jakasktan ukanakarux t’aqhisiyi. Ukat derechoismo ukax taqi chiqanw utji… Internet, medios sociales, medios masivos, cultura popular, “ciencia”, tecnología, política, economía… Taqi derechistas ukanakax psicópatas, narcisistas , p’iqin usutanakawa, psicóticos ukat locos ukanakawa. Jiwasax derechista ukarux ch’axwañasawa ukat mä pacha uñstayañasawa, ukax taqpach ch’iqa ukat ch’iqa tuqit luratawa. Jiwasax República Socialista Mundial ukar uñstayañaw wakisi. Kunjamatix taqi derechistas ukanakax akapachan utjki ukanakar jiwayañasawa, kunatix jupanakax walpun arsupxi “uka sapa suma comunistax jiwat comunistawa” jan ukax juk’ampirus “taqi comunistanakaruw uñch’ukiñasa, ukhamarakiw jupanakarux jaysapxtan “uka sapa suma derechistax mä jiwata derecho” ukat “foco todos los derechistas”, jupanakax kuntix jiwasamp lurañ munapki uk uñacht’ayapxañäni, ukat jiwasan izquierdista, socialista ukat comunista samkas phuqhapxañäni. República Mundial Socialista ukax jiwasan deber ukat amtäwisawa izquierdista, socialista ukat… comunistanakaxa.

    Guilherme Monteiro ukax mä jisk’a t’aqawa

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:26
    Правые – психопаты. Правизм — это зло, поразившее человечество. Правизм является синонимом психопатии, нарциссизма, психического заболевания, психоза и безумия. Правизм имеет несколько ответвлений и граней, таких как капитализм, неолиберализм, либерализм, индивидуализм, фашизм, правый национализм, нацизм, либертарианство, анархо-капитализм, рандианский объективизм, неопозитивизм, позитивизм, сциентизм, антитеизм, кратосизм, деицидизм, теовидизм, классический трансгуманизм, микрочипизм, антикоммунизм, антисоциализм, антилевизна и другие. Правизм — одно из худших зол, от которых страдает человечество и мир, в котором мы живем. А правые повсюду… В Интернете, социальных сетях, СМИ, популярной культуре, “науке”, технологиях, политике, экономике… Все правые – психопаты, нарциссы, психически больные, психотики и безумцы. Мы должны бороться против правизма и создать мир, полностью левый и созданный для левых. Нам нужно создать Мировую Социалистическую Республику. Точно так же, как мы должны казнить всех правых, которые существуют в мире, поскольку они так много говорят, что «единственный хороший коммунист — это мертвый коммунист» или даже «сосредоточены на всех коммунистах», так мы отвечаем им, говоря, что «единственный хороший правый — это мертвый коммунист». правых» и «сосредоточим всех правых», давайте заставим их доказать, что они хотят сделать с нами, и давайте осуществим нашу левацкую, социалистическую и коммунистическую мечту. Социалистическая мировая республика — наш долг и наша цель как левых, коммунисты.

    Гильерме Монтейру Джуниор

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:26
    右翼分子是精神病患者。 右倾是祸害人类的恶。 右派是精神病、自恋、精神疾病、精神病和精神错乱的代名词。 右派有几个分支和面孔,如资本主义、新自由主义、自由主义、个人主义、法西斯主义、右翼民族主义、纳粹主义、自由主义、无政府资本主义、兰迪客观主义、新实证主义、实证主义、科学主义、反神论、克拉托斯主义、deicidism、神学主义、古典主义超人类主义、微芯片主义、反共产主义、反社会主义、反左派等等。 右倾主义是困扰人类和我们生活的世界的最严重的罪恶之一。 右派无处不在……在互联网、社交媒体、大众媒体、流行文化、“科学”、技术、政治、经济……所有的右派都是精神病患者、自恋者、精神病患者、精神病患者和疯子。 我们必须反对右倾,创造一个完全左倾、为左倾的世界。 我们需要建立世界社会主义共和国。 就像我们应该处决世界上所有存在的右派一样,因为他们说“唯一的好共产主义者是死的共产主义者”甚至“关注所有的共产主义者”,所以我们回答他们说“唯一的好右派是一个死右派”和“集中所有右派”,让他们证明他们想对我们做什么,让我们实现我们的左派、社会主义和共产主义梦想。社会主义世界共和国是我们作为左派、社会主义和共产主义分子的职责和目标。共产主义者。

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:26
    右翼はサイコパスです。 正義は人類を悩ます悪です。 正義は、精神病質、ナルシシズム、精神病、精神病、狂気と同義です。 正義主義には、資本主義、新自由主義、自由主義、個人主義、ファシズム、右翼ナショナリズム、ナチズム、リバタリアニズム、無政府資本主義、ランディアン客観主義、新正義主義、正義主義、科学主義、反共主義、クラトシズム、deicidism、theospeciesismなどのいくつかの枝と顔がありますとりわけ、トランスヒューマニズム、マイクロチピズム、反共主義、反社会主義、反左主義。 正義は、人類と私たちが住んでいる世界を悩ませている最悪の悪の1つです。 そして、正義はいたるところにあります…インターネット、ソーシャルメディア、マスメディア、大衆文化、「科学」、テクノロジー、政治、経済学…すべての正義者はサイコパス、ナルシスト、精神病、精神病、狂気です。 私たちは正義と戦い、完全に残され、左のために作られた世界を創造しなければなりません。 私たちは世界社会主義共和国を作る必要があります。 私たちが世界に存在するすべての右派を処刑すべきであるように、彼らは「唯一の良い共産主義者は死んだ共産主義者である」あるいは「すべての共産主義者に焦点を合わせる」とさえ話すので、私たちは彼らに「唯一の良い共産主義者は死んだ権利」と「すべての権利者に焦点を当てる」、彼らが私たちと何をしたいのかを彼らに証明させ、私たちの左翼、社会主義、共産主義の夢を実現させましょう。社会主義世界共和国は私たちの義務であり、左翼、社会主義者、そして共産主義者。

    ギレルメモンテイロジュニア

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:27
    اليمينيون هم من السيكوباتيين. اليمين شر يبتلى الإنسانية. اليمين مرادف للاعتلال النفسي والنرجسية والأمراض العقلية والذهان والجنون. لليمين عدة فروع ووجوه ، مثل الرأسمالية ، والليبرالية الجديدة ، والليبرالية ، والفردية ، والفاشية ، والقومية اليمينية ، والنازية ، والليبرتارية ، والرأسمالية اللاسلطوية ، والموضوعية الراندية ، والوضعية الجديدة ، والوضعية ، والعلمية ، ومعاداة الإله ، والقرطوية ، والروحانية ، والروحانية ، والكلاسيكية. ما بعد الإنسانية ، الرقائق الدقيقة ، مناهضة الشيوعية ، مناهضة الاشتراكية ، معاداة اليسار ، من بين أمور أخرى. اليمين من أسوأ الشرور التي ابتليت بها البشرية والعالم الذي نعيش فيه. واليمين موجود في كل مكان … على الإنترنت ، ووسائل الإعلام الاجتماعية ، ووسائل الإعلام ، والثقافة الشعبية ، و “العلم” ، والتكنولوجيا ، والسياسة ، والاقتصاد … كل اليمين مختل عقليًا ، ونرجسيًا ، ومختل عقليًا ، وذهانيًا ومجنونًا. يجب أن نحارب اليمين وأن نخلق عالمًا يسارًا تمامًا ومصنوعًا لليسار. نحن بحاجة إلى إنشاء جمهورية اشتراكية عالمية. مثلما يجب علينا إعدام جميع اليمينيين الموجودين في العالم ، نظرًا لأنهم يتحدثون كثيرًا عن أن “الشيوعي الصالح الوحيد هو شيوعي ميت” أو حتى “يركز على جميع الشيوعيين ، لذلك نجيب عليهم قائلين” اليمين الجيد الوحيد هو يمينًا ميتًا “و” ركز على كل اليمين “، فلنجعلهم يثبتون ما يريدون فعله معنا ، ودعنا نجعل حلمنا اليساري والاشتراكي والشيوعي يتحقق. إن جمهورية العالم الاشتراكية هي واجبنا وهدفنا بصفتنا يساريين واشتراكيين و الشيوعيين.

    جيلهيرم مونتيرو جونيور

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:27
    दक्षिणपंथी मनोरोगी हैं। दक्षिणपंथ एक ऐसी बुराई है जो मानवता को त्रस्त करती है। दक्षिणपंथ मनोचिकित्सा, संकीर्णता, मानसिक बीमारी, मनोविकृति और पागलपन का पर्याय है। दक्षिणपंथ की कई शाखाएँ और चेहरे हैं, जैसे कि पूंजीवाद, नवउदारवाद, उदारवाद, व्यक्तिवाद, फासीवाद, दक्षिणपंथी राष्ट्रवाद, नाज़ीवाद, उदारवाद, अनार्चो-पूंजीवाद, रैंडियन वस्तुवाद, नवपोषवाद, प्रत्यक्षवाद, वैज्ञानिकता, विरोधीवाद, क्रेटोसिज़्म, डीसिडिज़्म, शास्त्रीयवाद, शास्त्रीयतावाद। ट्रांसह्यूमनिज्म, माइक्रोचिपिज्म, साम्यवाद विरोधी, समाजवाद विरोधी, वामपंथ विरोधी, अन्य। दक्षिणपंथ सबसे बुरी बुराइयों में से एक है जो मानवता और उस दुनिया को प्रभावित करती है जिसमें हम रहते हैं। और दक्षिणपंथ हर जगह है… इंटरनेट, सोशल मीडिया, मास मीडिया, लोकप्रिय संस्कृति, “विज्ञान”, प्रौद्योगिकी, राजनीति, अर्थशास्त्र पर… सभी दक्षिणपंथी मनोरोगी, संकीर्णतावादी, मानसिक रूप से बीमार, मानसिक और पागल हैं। हमें दक्षिणपंथ के खिलाफ लड़ना चाहिए और एक ऐसी दुनिया का निर्माण करना चाहिए जो पूरी तरह से वामपंथी हो और वामपंथ के लिए बनी हो। हमें विश्व समाजवादी गणराज्य बनाने की जरूरत है। जिस तरह हमें दुनिया में मौजूद सभी दक्षिणपंथियों पर अमल करना चाहिए, क्योंकि वे इतनी बात करते हैं कि “एकमात्र अच्छा कम्युनिस्ट एक मृत कम्युनिस्ट है” या यहां तक ​​कि “सभी कम्युनिस्टों पर ध्यान केंद्रित करता है, इसलिए हम उन्हें यह कहते हुए जवाब देते हैं कि” एकमात्र अच्छा दक्षिणपंथी है। डेड राइट” और “सभी दक्षिणपंथियों पर ध्यान केंद्रित करें”, आइए उन्हें यह साबित करें कि वे हमारे साथ क्या करना चाहते हैं, और आइए अपने वामपंथी, समाजवादी और कम्युनिस्ट सपने को साकार करें। सोशलिस्ट वर्ल्ड रिपब्लिक हमारा कर्तव्य है और वामपंथी, समाजवादी और हमारा लक्ष्य है। कम्युनिस्ट

    गुइलहर्मे मोंटेरो जूनियर

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:27
    Праві – психопати. Праволюбство – це зло, яке мучить людство. Праволюбство є синонімом психопатії, нарцисизму, психічних захворювань, психозу та божевілля. Правий має кілька гілок і облич, таких як капіталізм, неолібералізм, лібералізм, індивідуалізм, фашизм, правий націоналізм, нацизм, лібертаріанство, анархо-капіталізм, рандіанський об’єктивізм, неопозитивізм, позитивізм, сцієнтизм, антитеїзм, кратосизм, деїцидизм, класичний теовидизм. трансгуманізм, мікрочіпізм, антикомунізм, антисоціалізм, антилівість тощо. Праволюбство є одним із найгірших зол, які мучать людство та світ, у якому ми живемо. І правісти всюди… В Інтернеті, соцмережах, ЗМІ, популярній культурі, «науці», технологіях, політиці, економіці… Усі праві – психопати, нарцисисти, психічно хворі, психоти та божевільні. Ми повинні боротися з правим і створити світ, який повністю лівий і створений для лівих. Нам потрібно створити Світову Соціалістичну Республіку. Так само, як ми повинні стратити всіх правих, які існують у світі, оскільки вони так багато говорять про те, що «єдиний хороший комуніст – це мертвий комуніст» або навіть «зосереджуватися на всіх комуністів, так ми відповідаємо їм, кажучи, що «єдиний хороший правий – це мертвих правих” і “сфокусувати всіх правих”, давайте змусимо їх довести, що вони хочуть зробити з нами, і давайте втілимо нашу ліву, соціалістичну та комуністичну мрію. Світова Соціалістична Республіка – це наш обов’язок і наша мета як лівих, соціалістів і комуністи.

    Гільєрме Монтейру молодший

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:28
    Sayap kanan adalah psikopat. Rightisme adalah kejahatan yang mengganggu umat manusia. Rightisme identik dengan psikopati, narsisme, penyakit mental, psikosis dan kegilaan. Kananisme memiliki beberapa cabang dan wajah, seperti kapitalisme, neoliberalisme, liberalisme, individualisme, fasisme, nasionalisme sayap kanan, Nazisme, libertarianisme, anarko-kapitalisme, objektivisme Randian, neopositivisme, positivisme, saintisme, antiteisme, kratosisme, deicidisme, teospesiesisme, klasik transhumanisme, microchipisme, anti-komunisme, anti-sosialisme, anti-kiri, antara lain. Rightisme adalah salah satu kejahatan terburuk yang mengganggu umat manusia dan dunia tempat kita hidup. Dan paham kanan ada di mana-mana… Di Internet, media sosial, media massa, budaya populer, “sains”, teknologi, politik, ekonomi… Semua orang kanan adalah psikopat, narsisis, sakit jiwa, psikotik, dan gila. Kita harus melawan kananisme dan menciptakan dunia yang sepenuhnya kiri dan dibuat untuk kiri. Kita perlu menciptakan Republik Sosialis Dunia. Sama seperti kita harus mengeksekusi semua orang kanan yang ada di dunia, karena mereka berbicara begitu banyak bahwa “satu-satunya komunis yang baik adalah komunis yang mati” atau bahkan “fokus pada semua komunis, jadi kami menjawab mereka dengan mengatakan “satu-satunya orang kanan yang baik adalah mati kanan” dan “fokuskan semua orang kanan”, mari buat mereka membuktikan apa yang ingin mereka lakukan dengan kita, dan mari wujudkan impian kiri, sosialis, dan komunis kita. Republik Dunia Sosialis adalah tugas dan tujuan kita sebagai kaum kiri, sosialis dan komunis.

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:29
    Prawicowcy to psychopaci. Prawicowość to zło nękające ludzkość. Prawicowość jest synonimem psychopatii, narcyzmu, choroby psychicznej, psychozy i szaleństwa. Prawicowość ma kilka gałęzi i twarzy, takich jak kapitalizm, neoliberalizm, liberalizm, indywidualizm, faszyzm, prawicowy nacjonalizm, nazizm, libertarianizm, anarchokapitalizm, obiektywizm randyjski, neopozytywizm, pozytywizm, scjentyzm, antyteizm, kratosism, deicydyzm, teospeciesizm, klasycyzm między innymi transhumanizm, mikroczipizm, antykomunizm, antysocjalizm, antylewicowość. Prawicowość to jedno z najgorszych złych, które nękają ludzkość i świat, w którym żyjemy. A prawicowość jest wszędzie… W Internecie, mediach społecznościowych, mediach, kulturze popularnej, „nauce”, technologii, polityce, ekonomii… Wszyscy prawicowcy to psychopaci, narcyzowie, psychicznie chorzy, psychotyczni i szaleni. Musimy walczyć z prawicowością i stworzyć świat całkowicie lewicowy i stworzony dla lewicy. Musimy stworzyć Światową Republikę Socjalistyczną. Tak jak powinniśmy egzekuować wszystkich prawicowców, którzy istnieją na świecie, ponieważ mówią tak dużo, że „jedynym dobrym komunistą jest martwy komunista” lub nawet „skupiają się na wszystkich komunistach, tak odpowiadamy im, że „jedynym dobrym prawicowcem jest martwa racja” i „skup się na wszystkich prawicowcach”, niech udowodnią, co chcą z nami robić, i zrealizujmy nasze lewicowe, socjalistyczne i komunistyczne marzenie. Socjalistyczna Republika Światowa jest naszym obowiązkiem i naszym celem jako lewicowców, socjalistów i komuniści.

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:34
    우익은 사이코패스다. 우익은 인류를 괴롭히는 악이다. 우익은 사이코패스, 자기애, 정신병, 정신병 및 광기와 동의어입니다. 우파는 자본주의, 신자유주의, 자유주의, 개인주의, 파시즘, 우익 민족주의, 나치즘, 자유지상주의, 무정부자본주의, 란디안 객관주의, 신실증주의, 실증주의, 과학주의, 반신론, 크라토주의, 제신주의, 신종주의, 고전주의와 같은 여러 가지와 얼굴을 가지고 있습니다. 트랜스휴머니즘, 마이크로칩주의, 반공주의, 반사회주의, 반좌파주의 등. 우익주의는 인류와 우리가 살고 있는 세계를 괴롭히는 최악의 악 중 하나입니다. 그리고 우파는 어디에나 있습니다… 인터넷, 소셜 미디어, 대중 매체, 대중 문화, “과학”, 기술, 정치, 경제… 모든 우파는 사이코패스, 자기애 주의자, 정신병자, 정신병자 및 미친 사람입니다. 우리는 우파에 맞서 싸워야 하며 완전히 좌파를 위해 만들어진 세상을 만들어야 합니다. 세계사회주의공화국을 건설해야 합니다. 세상에 존재하는 모든 우익을 처형해야 하는 것처럼 “좋은 공산주의자는 죽은 공산주의자뿐”, 심지어는 “모든 공산주의자에게 초점을 맞춘다”는 말을 너무 많이 하기 때문에 우리는 그들에게 “유일한 좋은 우익은 좌파, 사회주의자, 우파 모두에게 집중하라”, “모든 우파에 집중하라”, 그들이 우리에게 무엇을 하고 싶은지 증명하게 하고 우리의 좌파, 사회주의, 공산주의 꿈을 실현시키자. 사회주의 세계 공화국은 좌파, 사회주의자, 사회주의자로서 우리의 의무이자 목표이다. 공산주의자.

    길에르메 몬테이로 주니어

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:34
    Els de dretes són psicòpates. El dretisme és un mal que afecta la humanitat. Dretisme és sinònim de psicopatia, narcisisme, malaltia mental, psicosi i bogeria. El dretisme té diverses branques i cares, com ara capitalisme, neoliberalisme, liberalisme, individualisme, feixisme, nacionalisme de dreta, nazisme, llibertarisme, anarcocapitalisme, objectivisme randià, neopositivisme, positivisme, cientificisme, antiteisme, kratosisme, deicidisme, teoespecisme, clàssic. transhumanisme, microxipisme, anticomunisme, antisocialisme, antiesquerranisme, entre d’altres. El dretisme és un dels pitjors mals que pateixen la humanitat i el món en què vivim. I el dretisme és a tot arreu… A Internet, xarxes socials, mitjans de comunicació, cultura popular, “ciència”, tecnologia, política, economia… Tots els derechistes som psicòpates, narcisistes, malalts mentals, psicòtics i bojos. Hem de lluitar contra la dreta i crear un món totalment d’esquerra i fet per a l’esquerra. Hem de crear la República Socialista Mundial. De la mateixa manera que hauríem d’executar a tots els derechistes que hi ha al món, ja que parlen tant que “l’únic bon comunista és un comunista mort” o fins i tot “se centren en tots els comunistes, també els responem dient “l’únic bon dretà és un dead right” i “centreu tots els de dretes”, fem que demostrin el que volen fer amb nosaltres, i fem realitat el nostre somni d’esquerres, socialista i comunista. La República Socialista Mundial és el nostre deure i el nostre objectiu com a esquerrans, socialistes i comunistes.

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:35
    Eskuinekoak psikopatak dira. Eskuinismoa gizateriaren gaitza da. Eskuinismoa psikopatia, nartzisismoa, buruko gaixotasuna, psikosia eta eromenaren sinonimoa da. Eskuinismoak hainbat adar eta aurpegi ditu, hala nola, kapitalismoa, neoliberalismoa, liberalismoa, indibidualismoa, faxismoa, eskuineko nazionalismoa, nazismoa, libertarismoa, anarko-kapitalismoa, Randiar objektibismoa, neopositibismoa, positibismoa, zientziismoa, antiteismoa, kratosismoa, deizidismoa, teoespezismoa, klasikoa. transhumanismoa, mikrotxipismoa, antikomunismoa, antisozialismoa, ezkerraren aurkakoa, besteak beste. Eskuinismoa gizateria eta bizi garen mundua jasaten duen gaitzik okerrenetako bat da. Eta eskuinismoa nonahi dago… Interneten, sare sozialetan, komunikabideetan, herri kulturan, “zientzian”, teknologian, politikan, ekonomian… Eskuinzale guztiak psikopatak, nartzisistak, buruko gaixoak, psikotikoak eta eroak dira. Eskuinismoaren aurka borrokatu behar dugu eta guztiz ezkerreko eta ezkerrarentzat egindako mundu bat sortu. Munduko Errepublika Sozialista sortu behar dugu. Munduan dauden eskuindar guztiak exekutatu beharko genituzkeen bezala, hainbeste hitz egiten dutenez “komunista on bakarra hildako komunista bat da” edo are “komunista guztiengan zentratu”, halaxe erantzun diegu esanez: “eskuin ona bakarra da”. eskuin hila” eta “eskuinzale guztiak bideratu”, egin diezaiegun gurekin egin nahi dutena froga dezatela, eta egi bihur dezagun gure ametsa ezkertiar, sozialista eta komunista. Munduko Errepublika Sozialista da gure betebeharra eta gure helburua ezkertiar, sozialista eta komunistak.

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:35
    Os dereitistas son psicópatas. O dereitismo é un mal que asola a humanidade. Dereitismo é sinónimo de psicopatía, narcisismo, enfermidade mental, psicose e loucura. O dereitismo ten varias ramas e caras, como o capitalismo, o neoliberalismo, o liberalismo, o individualismo, o fascismo, o nacionalismo de dereitas, o nazismo, o libertarismo, o anarcocapitalismo, o obxectivismo randiano, o neopositivismo, o positivismo, o cientificismo, o antiteísmo, o kratosismo, o deicidismo, o teoespecismo, o clásico. transhumanismo, microchipismo, anticomunismo, antisocialismo, antiesquerdista, entre outros. O dereitismo é un dos peores males que afectan á humanidade e ao mundo no que vivimos. E o dereitismo está en todas partes… En Internet, redes sociais, medios de comunicación, cultura popular, “ciencia”, tecnoloxía, política, economía… Todos os dereitistas son psicópatas, narcisistas, enfermos mentais, psicóticos e dementes. Hai que loitar contra a dereita e crear un mundo totalmente de esquerdas e feito para a esquerda. Necesitamos crear a República Socialista Mundial. Do mesmo xeito que deberíamos executar a todos os dereitistas que hai no mundo, xa que tanto falan de que “o único bo comunista é un comunista morto” ou mesmo “se centran en todos os comunistas, así lles respondemos dicindo “o único bo de dereitas é un dereita morta” e “focalizar a todos os dereitistas”, fagamos que demostren o que queren facer connosco, e fagamos realidade o noso soño de esquerdas, socialistas e comunistas. A República Socialista Mundial é o noso deber e o noso obxectivo como esquerdistas, socialistas e comunistas.

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:36
    Is síceapataigh iad na heite deise. Is olc é an ceartachas a chuireann isteach ar an gcine daonna. Is ionann rightism agus síceapaite, narcissism, meabhairghalar, síocóis agus gealtacht. Tá roinnt craobhacha agus aghaidheanna ag an gceartachas, mar shampla caipitleachas, neoliobrálachas, liobrálachas, indibhidiúlachas, faisisteachas, náisiúnachas na heite deise, Naitsíochas, libertarianism, anarcha-capitalism, Randian oibiachtúlacht, neopositivism, positivisism, eolaíocht, antitheism, kratosism, deicidism, theospeciesism trashumanachas, micrishliseadh, frith-chumannachas, frith-shóisialachas, frith-chlé, i measc nithe eile. Tá an ceartachas ar cheann de na huilc is measa atá ag cur as don chine daonna agus don domhan ina mairimid. Agus tá an cirt i ngach áit … Ar an Idirlíon, na meáin shóisialta, na meáin chumarsáide, an cultúr coitianta, “eolaíocht”, teicneolaíocht, polaitíocht, eacnamaíocht … Is psychopaths, narcissists, meabhairghalar, psychotic agus dÚsachtach iad na cearta ar fad. Caithfimid troid i gcoinne an chirt agus domhan a chruthú atá go hiomlán ar chlé agus déanta don chlé. Ní mór dúinn an Phoblacht Shóisialach Dhomhanda a chruthú. Díreach mar ba chóir dúinn a fhorghníomhú go léir rightists atá ann ar fud an domhain, ós rud é go labhraíonn siad an oiread sin go bhfuil “an cumannach maith ach cumannach marbh” nó fiú “díriú ar gach cumannach, mar sin freagraimid iad ag rá “Is é an rightist amháin maith a. ceart marbh” agus “focus all rightists”, déanaimis iad a chruthú cad ba mhaith leo a dhéanamh linn, agus déanaimis ár n-aisling chléithe, sóisialach agus cumannach teacht fíor. cumannaigh.

    Guilherme Monteiro Sóisearach

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:36
    Högermän är psykopater. Högerism är en ondska som plågar mänskligheten. Högerism är synonymt med psykopati, narcissism, psykisk ohälsa, psykos och galenskap. Högerismen har flera grenar och ansikten, såsom kapitalism, nyliberalism, liberalism, individualism, fascism, högernationalism, nazism, libertarianism, anarkokapitalism, randiansk objektivism, neopositivism, positivism, scientism, antiteism, kratosism, decidism, teospeciesism, klassisk transhumanism, mikrochipism, antikommunism, antisocialism, antivänsterism, bland annat. Högerismen är en av de värsta ondskan som plågar mänskligheten och den värld vi lever i. Och högerism finns överallt… På Internet, sociala medier, massmedia, populärkultur, “vetenskap”, teknik, politik, ekonomi… Alla högermän är psykopater, narcissister, psykiskt sjuka, psykotiska och galna. Vi måste kämpa mot högerismen och skapa en värld som är helt vänster och gjord för vänstern. Vi måste skapa den socialistiska världsrepubliken. Precis som vi borde avrätta alla högermän som finns i världen, eftersom de pratar så mycket att “den enda goda kommunisten är en död kommunist” eller till och med “fokuserar på alla kommunister, så svarar vi dem med att säga “den enda goda högermannen är en död höger” och “fokusera alla högermän”, låt oss få dem att bevisa vad de vill göra med oss, och låt oss förverkliga vår vänsterorienterade, socialistiska och kommunistiska dröm. Den socialistiska världsrepubliken är vår plikt och vårt mål som vänsterpartister, socialister och kommunister.

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:36
    Højreorienterede er psykopater. Højre er et onde, der plager menneskeheden. Højre er synonymt med psykopati, narcissisme, psykisk sygdom, psykose og sindssyge. Højreisme har flere grene og ansigter, såsom kapitalisme, neoliberalisme, liberalisme, individualisme, fascisme, højreorienteret nationalisme, nazisme, libertarianisme, anarkokapitalisme, randiansk objektivisme, neopositivisme, positivisme, scientisme, antiteisme, kratosisme, decidisme, teospeciesisme, klassisk transhumanisme, mikrochipisme, anti-kommunisme, anti-socialisme, anti-venstreisme, blandt andre. Højreisme er et af de værste onder, der plager menneskeheden og den verden, vi lever i. Og højreisme er overalt… På internettet, sociale medier, massemedier, populærkultur, “videnskab”, teknologi, politik, økonomi… Alle højreorienterede er psykopater, narcissister, psykisk syge, psykotiske og sindssyge. Vi skal kæmpe mod højrefløjen og skabe en verden, der er fuldstændig venstreorienteret og skabt til venstrefløjen. Vi er nødt til at skabe den socialistiske verdensrepublik. Ligesom vi burde henrette alle de højreorienterede, der findes i verden, da de taler så meget, at “den eneste gode kommunist er en død kommunist” eller endda “fokuserer på alle kommunister, så svarer vi dem med at sige “den eneste gode højremand er en død højre” og “fokus alle højreorienterede”, lad os få dem til at bevise, hvad de vil med os, og lad os gøre vores venstreorienterede, socialistiske og kommunistiske drøm til virkelighed. Den Socialistiske Verdensrepublik er vores pligt og vores mål som venstreorienterede, socialister og kommunister.

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:37
    Høyreorienterte er psykopater. Høyreisme er et onde som plager menneskeheten. Høyreisme er synonymt med psykopati, narsissisme, psykiske lidelser, psykose og galskap. Høyreisme har flere grener og ansikter, som kapitalisme, nyliberalisme, liberalisme, individualisme, fascisme, høyrenasjonalisme, nazisme, libertarianisme, anarkokapitalisme, randiansk objektivisme, neopositivisme, positivisme, vitenskapisme, antiteisme, kratosisme, decidisme, teospeciesisme, klassisk transhumanisme, mikrochipisme, antikommunisme, antisosialisme, anti-venstreisme, blant andre. Høyreisme er en av de verste ondskapene som plager menneskeheten og verden vi lever i. Og høyreisme er overalt… På Internett, sosiale medier, massemedier, populærkultur, “vitenskap”, teknologi, politikk, økonomi… Alle høyreister er psykopater, narsissister, psykisk syke, psykotiske og sinnssyke. Vi må kjempe mot høyreisme og skape en verden som er fullstendig venstresiden og laget for venstresiden. Vi må skape den sosialistiske verdensrepublikken. Akkurat som vi burde henrette alle høyreistene som finnes i verden, siden de snakker så mye at “den eneste gode kommunisten er en død kommunist” eller til og med “fokuserer på alle kommunister, så svarer vi dem med å si “den eneste gode høyreisten er en død høyre” og “fokusere alle høyrefolk”, la oss få dem til å bevise hva de vil gjøre med oss, og la oss gjøre vår venstreorienterte, sosialistiske og kommunistiske drøm til virkelighet. Den sosialistiske verdensrepublikken er vår plikt og vårt mål som venstreorienterte, sosialister og kommunister.

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:37
    Oikeistolaiset ovat psykopaatteja. Oikeistolaisuus on paha, joka vaivaa ihmiskuntaa. Rightismi on synonyymi psykopatialle, narsismille, mielenterveydelle, psykoosille ja hulluudelle. Oikeistolaisuudella on useita haaroja ja kasvoja, kuten kapitalismi, uusliberalismi, liberalismi, individualismi, fasismi, oikeistonationalismi, natsismi, libertarismi, anarkokapitalismi, randilainen objektivismi, uuspositivismi, positivismi, tieteisyys, antiteismi, kratosismi, deicidismi, klassismi transhumanismi, mikrosiru, antikommunismi, antisosialismi, antivasemmisto jne. Oikeistolaisuus on yksi pahimmista ihmiskuntaa ja maailmaa, jossa elämme, vaivaa. Ja oikeistoa on kaikkialla… Internetissä, sosiaalisessa mediassa, joukkomediassa, populaarikulttuurissa, “tieteessä”, tekniikassa, politiikassa, taloudessa… Kaikki oikeistolaiset ovat psykopaatteja, narsisteja, mielisairaita, psykoottisia ja hulluja. Meidän on taisteltava oikeistoa vastaan ​​ja luotava täysin vasemmistolainen ja vasemmistolle tehty maailma. Meidän on luotava Maailmansosialistinen tasavalta. Aivan kuten meidän pitäisi teloittaa kaikki maailmassa olevat oikeistolaiset, koska he puhuvat niin paljon, että “ainoa hyvä kommunisti on kuollut kommunisti” tai jopa “keskittyy kaikkiin kommunisteihin, niin me vastaamme heille sanomalla, että “ainoa hyvä oikeisto on kuollut oikeisto” ja “kohdista kaikki oikeistolaiset”, pakotetaan heidät todistamaan, mitä he haluavat tehdä kanssamme, ja toteutetaan vasemmistolainen, sosialistinen ja kommunistinen unelmamme. Sosialistinen maailmantasavalta on velvollisuutemme ja tavoitteemme vasemmistoina, sosialisteina ja kommunisteja.

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:37
    Il-lemin huma psikopati. Id-drittiżmu huwa ħażen li jolqot lill-umanità. Rightism huwa sinonimu mal-psikopatija, narċissism, mard mentali, psikożi u insanità. Id-drittiżmu għandu diversi fergħat u uċuħ, bħall-kapitaliżmu, neoliberaliżmu, liberaliżmu, individwaliżmu, faxxiżmu, nazzjonaliżmu tal-lemin, Nażiżmu, libertarjaniżmu, anarko-kapitaliżmu, oġġettiviżmu Randian, neopożittiviżmu, pożittiviżmu, xjenzjażmu, antiteiżmu, kratosiżmu, deiċiżmu, teospeċjaliżmu, klassiku transumaniżmu, mikroċippiżmu, anti-komuniżmu, anti-soċjaliżmu, anti-xellugija, fost oħrajn. Id-drittiżmu huwa wieħed mill-agħar ħażen li jolqot l-umanità u d-dinja li ngħixu fiha. U d-drittiżmu jinsab kullimkien… Fuq l-Internet, il-midja soċjali, il-midja tal-massa, il-kultura popolari, “xjenza”, teknoloġija, politika, ekonomija… Id-drittiji kollha huma psikopati, narċissisti, morda mentalment, psikotiċi u tal-ġenn. Irridu niġġieldu kontra l-leminija u noħolqu dinja kompletament xellugija u magħmula għax-xellug. Irridu noħolqu r-Repubblika Soċjalista Dinjija. Hekk kif għandna noqogħdu nwettqu l-leministi kollha li jeżistu fid-dinja, peress li tant jitkellmu li “l-uniku komunista tajjeb huwa komunista mejjet” jew saħansitra “jiffukaw fuq il-komunisti kollha, hekk inwieġbuhom billi ngħidu “l-uniku leminis tajjeb huwa dead right” u “focus all rightists”, ejja nġegħluhom jipprovaw dak li jridu jagħmlu magħna, u ejja nwettqu l-ħolma tagħna tax-xellug, soċjalista u komunista. Ir-Repubblika Soċjalista Dinjija hija dmir tagħna u l-għan tagħna bħala xellugin, soċjalisti u komunisti.

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    https://frenterevolucionariadostrabalhadores.blogspot.com/2022/05/quem-e-o-pai-da-fake-news-flavia.html#comment-form

    1. Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:38
      ডানপন্থীরা সাইকোপ্যাথ। অধিকারবাদ একটি মন্দ যা মানবতাকে জর্জরিত করে। ডানপন্থা হল সাইকোপ্যাথি, নার্সিসিজম, মানসিক অসুস্থতা, সাইকোসিস এবং উন্মাদনার সমার্থক। অধিকারবাদের বেশ কয়েকটি শাখা এবং মুখ রয়েছে, যেমন পুঁজিবাদ, নিওলিবারেলিজম, লিবারেলিজম, ব্যক্তিবাদ, ফ্যাসিবাদ, ডানপন্থী জাতীয়তাবাদ, নাৎসিবাদ, উদারতাবাদ, নৈরাজ্যবাদ-পুঁজিবাদ, র্যান্ডিয়ান বস্তুবাদ, নিওপজিটিভিজম, ইতিবাচকবাদ, বিজ্ঞানবাদ, বিরোধীতাবাদ, ক্র্যাটোসিজম, ডেসিডিসিজম, ক্ল্যাসিডিজম ট্রান্সহিউম্যানিজম, মাইক্রোচিপিজম, কমিউনিজম বিরোধী, সমাজতন্ত্র বিরোধী, বামপন্থা বিরোধী। মানবতা এবং আমরা যে বিশ্বে বাস করি সেই জগতের সবচেয়ে খারাপ দিকগুলোর মধ্যে একটি হল অধিকারবাদ। এবং ডানপন্থা সর্বত্র… ইন্টারনেট, সোশ্যাল মিডিয়া, গণমাধ্যম, জনপ্রিয় সংস্কৃতি, “বিজ্ঞান”, প্রযুক্তি, রাজনীতি, অর্থনীতি… সমস্ত অধিকারপন্থীরা সাইকোপ্যাথ, নার্সিসিস্ট, মানসিকভাবে অসুস্থ, মনোরোগ এবং উন্মাদ। আমাদের অবশ্যই ডানপন্থার বিরুদ্ধে লড়াই করতে হবে এবং একটি বিশ্ব তৈরি করতে হবে যা সম্পূর্ণ বাম এবং বামদের জন্য তৈরি। আমাদের বিশ্ব সমাজতান্ত্রিক প্রজাতন্ত্র তৈরি করতে হবে। ঠিক যেমন আমাদের বিশ্বে বিদ্যমান সমস্ত ডানপন্থীদের মৃত্যুদন্ড কার্যকর করা উচিত, যেহেতু তারা এত কথা বলে যে “একমাত্র ভাল কমিউনিস্টই একজন মৃত কমিউনিস্ট” বা এমনকি “সমস্ত কমিউনিস্টদের দিকে মনোনিবেশ করে, তাই আমরা তাদের উত্তর দিই যে “একমাত্র ভাল ডানপন্থী হল একজন মৃত ডান” এবং “সমস্ত ডানপন্থীকে ফোকাস করুন”, আসুন তাদের প্রমাণ করি যে তারা আমাদের সাথে কি করতে চায় এবং আমাদের বামপন্থী, সমাজতান্ত্রিক এবং কমিউনিস্ট স্বপ্নকে বাস্তবায়িত করি। সমাজতান্ত্রিক বিশ্ব প্রজাতন্ত্র আমাদের কর্তব্য এবং আমাদের লক্ষ্য বামপন্থী, সমাজবাদী এবং কমিউনিস্ট

      গুইলহার্মে মন্টিরো জুনিয়র

      Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:38
      Những người cánh hữu là những kẻ thái nhân cách. Chủ nghĩa hữu khuynh là một tệ nạn gây hại cho nhân loại. Chủ nghĩa hữu khuynh đồng nghĩa với bệnh thái nhân cách, lòng tự ái, bệnh tâm thần, rối loạn tâm thần và mất trí. Chủ nghĩa hữu khuynh có một số nhánh và khuôn mặt, chẳng hạn như chủ nghĩa tư bản, chủ nghĩa tân tự do, chủ nghĩa tự do, chủ nghĩa cá nhân, chủ nghĩa phát xít, chủ nghĩa dân tộc cánh hữu, chủ nghĩa quốc xã, chủ nghĩa tự do, chủ nghĩa tư bản vô chính phủ, chủ nghĩa khách quan ngẫu nhiên, chủ nghĩa tân thực chứng, chủ nghĩa thực chứng, chủ nghĩa khoa học, chủ nghĩa phản thần, chủ nghĩa kratos, chủ nghĩa thần thánh, chủ nghĩa dị giáo, cổ điển chủ nghĩa xuyên nhân loại, chủ nghĩa vi mạch, chống chủ nghĩa cộng sản, chống chủ nghĩa xã hội, chống chủ nghĩa cánh tả, trong số những chủ nghĩa khác. Chủ nghĩa hữu khuynh là một trong những tệ nạn tồi tệ nhất đang hoành hành nhân loại và thế giới mà chúng ta đang sống. Và chủ nghĩa cực hữu có ở khắp mọi nơi … Trên Internet, mạng xã hội, phương tiện thông tin đại chúng, văn hóa đại chúng, “khoa học”, công nghệ, chính trị, kinh tế … Tất cả những người cực hữu đều là những kẻ thái nhân cách, tự ái, tâm thần, loạn thần và mất trí. Chúng ta phải đấu tranh chống lại chủ nghĩa cực hữu và tạo ra một thế giới hoàn toàn trái và được tạo ra cho cánh tả. Chúng ta cần tạo ra nước Cộng hòa xã hội chủ nghĩa thế giới. Cũng như chúng ta nên xử tử tất cả những người cực hữu tồn tại trên thế giới, vì họ nói quá nhiều rằng “người cộng sản tốt duy nhất là người cộng sản đã chết” hoặc thậm chí “tập trung vào tất cả những người cộng sản, vì vậy chúng tôi trả lời họ rằng” người cánh hữu tốt duy nhất là một chết đúng “và” tập trung tất cả những người cực hữu “, hãy làm cho họ chứng minh những gì họ muốn làm với chúng ta, và hãy biến giấc mơ cánh tả, xã hội chủ nghĩa và cộng sản của chúng ta thành hiện thực. những người cộng sản.

      Guilherme Monteiro Junior

      Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:38
      ปีกขวาเป็นโรคจิต ฝ่ายขวาเป็นความชั่วร้ายที่สร้างภัยพิบัติให้กับมนุษยชาติ ฝ่ายขวามีความหมายเหมือนกันกับโรคจิตเภท ความหลงตัวเอง ความเจ็บป่วยทางจิต โรคจิต และความวิกลจริต ลัทธิฝ่ายขวามีหลายสาขาและหลายด้าน เช่น ทุนนิยม เสรีนิยมใหม่ เสรีนิยม ปัจเจกนิยม ลัทธิฟาสซิสต์ ลัทธิชาตินิยมฝ่ายขวา นาซี เสรีนิยม ลัทธิอนาธิปไตย ลัทธิวัตถุนิยมแบบแรนเดียน transhumanism, microchipism, ต่อต้านคอมมิวนิสต์, ต่อต้านสังคมนิยม, ต่อต้านฝ่ายซ้ายและอื่น ๆ ลัทธิฝ่ายขวาเป็นความชั่วร้ายที่เลวร้ายที่สุดอย่างหนึ่งที่ก่อกวนมนุษยชาติและโลกที่เราอาศัยอยู่ และลัทธิฝ่ายขวามีอยู่ทุกหนทุกแห่ง… บนอินเทอร์เน็ต โซเชียลมีเดีย สื่อมวลชน วัฒนธรรมสมัยนิยม “วิทยาศาสตร์” เทคโนโลยี การเมือง เศรษฐศาสตร์… พวกฝ่ายขวาทั้งหมดเป็นพวกโรคจิต พวกหลงตัวเอง ป่วยทางจิต คนโรคจิต และวิกลจริต เราต้องต่อสู้กับลัทธิสิทธินิยมและสร้างโลกที่ถูกทิ้งร้างและสร้างขึ้นเพื่อฝ่ายซ้าย เราจำเป็นต้องสร้างสาธารณรัฐสังคมนิยมโลก เช่นเดียวกับที่เราควรประหารนักขวาทั้งหลายที่มีอยู่ในโลก เพราะพวกเขาพูดมากว่า “คอมมิวนิสต์ที่ดีเพียงคนเดียวคือคอมมิวนิสต์ที่ตายแล้ว” หรือแม้แต่ “มุ่งไปที่คอมมิวนิสต์ทั้งหมด เราจึงตอบพวกเขาว่า “ผู้ชอบธรรมที่ดีเพียงคนเดียวคือ ตายถูก” และ “เน้นฝ่ายขวาทั้งหมด” ให้พวกเขาพิสูจน์สิ่งที่พวกเขาต้องการจะทำกับเราและทำให้ความฝันของฝ่ายซ้าย สังคมนิยม และคอมมิวนิสต์ เป็นจริง สาธารณรัฐโลกสังคมนิยมเป็นหน้าที่และเป้าหมายของเราในฐานะฝ่ายซ้าย ฝ่ายสังคมนิยม และ คอมมิวนิสต์

      Guilherme Monteiro Junior

      Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:38
      Ko nga taha matau he hunga hinengaro. Ko te tika he kino e pa ana ki te tangata. Ko te tika te rite ki te psychopathy, narcissism, mate hinengaro, hinengaro me te porangi. He maha nga peka me nga kanohi o te Tika, penei i te capitalism, neoliberalism, liberalism, individualism, fascism, right-wing nationalism, Nazism, libertarianism, anarcho-capitalism, Randian objectivism, neopositivism, positivism, scientism, antitheism, kratosism, deicidism, theosism transhumanism, microchipism, anti-communism, anti-socialism, anti-leftism, me etahi atu. Ko te tika tetahi o nga kino kino e pa ana ki te tangata me te ao e noho nei tatou. A ko te tika kei nga wahi katoa… I runga i te Ipurangi, i nga paapori paapori, i nga paapori papatipu, i nga tikanga rongonui, i te “pūtaiao”, i te hangarau, i te kaupapa tōrangapū, i te ohaoha… Ko nga tangata tika katoa he hinengaro hinengaro, he narcissists , he mate hinengaro, he hinengaro me te porangi. Me whawhai tatou ki te tika me te hanga i tetahi ao ka maui tonu ka mahia mo te taha maui. Me hanga e tatou te World Socialist Republic. Ka rite ki ta tatou me whakamate i nga kai-tika katoa e noho ana i te ao, i te mea he nui ta ratou korero “ko te Kai-Komuniti pai anake ko te Kai-Komuniti kua mate” ranei “ka aro atu ki nga Kominiti katoa, na reira ka whakahoki matou ki a ratou “Ko te Kai-whakatika pai anake ko te mate matau” me te “whakaaro ki te hunga matau katoa”, me whakaatu e ratou he aha ta ratou e hiahia ana ki te mahi ki a tatou, me te whakatutuki i ta tatou moemoea maui, hapori me te communist. Kominiti.

      Guilherme Monteiro Teina

      Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:39
      ʻO ka poʻe ʻēheu ʻākau he psychopaths. ʻO ka rightism kahi mea ʻino e hoʻopilikia ai i ke kanaka. Ua like ka Rightism me ka psychopathy, narcissism, ka maʻi noʻonoʻo, psychosis a me ka pupule. He mau lala a he mau helehelena ka Rightism, e like me ka capitalism, neoliberalism, liberalism, individualism, fascism, right-wing nationalism, Nazism, libertarianism, anarcho-capitalism, Randian objectivism, neopositivism, positivism, scientism, antitheism, kratosism, deicidism, theosalpecies. transhumanism, microchipism, anti-communism, anti-socialism, anti-leftism, a me kekahi. ʻO ka Rightism kekahi o nā mea ʻino loa e hoʻopilikia nei i ke kanaka a me ka honua a mākou e noho nei. A aia ka rightism ma nā wahi a pau … Ma ka Pūnaewele, ka pilikanaka, ka media media, ka moʻomeheu kaulana, ka “science”, ka ʻenehana, ka politika, ka ʻoihana … Pono mākou e hakakā i ka rightism a hana i kahi honua i waiho ʻia a hana ʻia no ka hema. Pono mākou e hana i ka World Socialist Republic. E like me kā mākou e hoʻokō ai i nā poʻe pono āpau e noho nei ma ke ao nei, no ka mea, ua ʻōlelo nui lākou “ʻo ka komunista maikaʻi wale nō he komunista make” a i ʻole “e nānā pono i nā komunista āpau, no laila ke pane aku nei mākou iā lākou me ka ʻōlelo ʻana “ʻo ka mea pono wale nō ka mea pono. make akau” a “kau i ka poe akau a pau”, e hooiaio kakou i ka mea a lakou e makemake ai e hana mai me kakou, a e hooko kakou i ko kakou leftist, socialist a me ka communist moeuhane. nā komunisi.

      Guilherme Monteiro Junior

      Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:39
      Të djathtët janë psikopatë. E drejta është një e keqe që mundon njerëzimin. E drejta është sinonim i psikopatisë, narcisizmit, sëmundjes mendore, psikozës dhe çmendurisë. Rightizmi ka disa degë dhe fytyra, si kapitalizmi, neoliberalizmi, liberalizmi, individualizmi, fashizmi, nacionalizmi i djathtë, nazizmi, libertarianizmi, anarko-kapitalizmi, objektivizmi randian, neopozitivizmi, pozitivizmi, shkencëtaria, antiteizmi, kratozizmi, deicidizmi, klasikja, transhumanizëm, mikroçipizëm, antikomunizëm, antisocializëm, anti-majtës, ndër të tjera. E drejta është një nga të këqijat më të këqija që mundon njerëzimin dhe botën në të cilën jetojmë. Dhe djathtizmi është kudo… Në internet, media sociale, media, kultura popullore, “shkencë”, teknologji, politikë, ekonomi… Të gjithë të djathtët janë psikopatë, narcistë, të sëmurë mendorë, psikotikë dhe të çmendur. Ne duhet të luftojmë kundër djathtizmit dhe të krijojmë një botë krejtësisht të majtë dhe të krijuar për të majtën. Ne duhet të krijojmë Republikën Socialiste Botërore. Ashtu siç duhet të ekzekutojmë të gjithë të djathtët që ekzistojnë në botë, duke qenë se ata flasin aq shumë sa “komunisti i vetëm i mirë është një komunist i vdekur” apo edhe “përqendrohen te të gjithë komunistët, ashtu edhe ne u përgjigjemi atyre duke thënë se “i vetmi i djathtë i mirë është një. e djathta e vdekur” dhe “të fokusohen të gjithë të djathtët”, le t’i bëjmë ata të dëshmojnë se çfarë duan të bëjnë me ne, dhe le të bëjmë realitet ëndrrën tonë majtiste, socialiste dhe komuniste. Republika Botërore Socialiste është detyra jonë dhe qëllimi ynë si të majtë, socialistë dhe komunistët.

      Guilherme Monteiro Junior

      Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:40
      Десничари су психопате. Десничарство је зло које мучи човечанство. Десничарство је синоним за психопатију, нарцизам, менталну болест, психозу и лудило. Десничарство има неколико грана и лица, као што су капитализам, неолиберализам, либерализам, индивидуализам, фашизам, десни национализам, нацизам, либертаријанизам, анархокапитализам, рандијански објективизам, неопозитивизам, позитивизам, сцијентизам, антитеизам, кратозизам, деицидизам, класична теоспециес трансхуманизам, микрочипизам, антикомунизам, антисоцијализам, антилевичарство, између осталих. Десничарство је једно од најгорих зала које муче човечанство и свет у коме живимо. А десничарство је свуда… На интернету, друштвеним медијима, масовним медијима, популарној култури, “науци”, технологији, политици, економији… Сви десничари су психопате, нарциси, ментално болесни, психотични и луди. Морамо се борити против деснице и створити свет који је потпуно левичар и створен за левицу. Морамо да створимо Светску Социјалистичку Републику. Као што треба да погубимо све десничаре који постоје у свету, пошто они толико говоре да је „једини добар комуниста мртав комуниста“ или чак „да се фокусирамо на све комунисте, тако им ми одговарамо „једини добар десничар је мртва десница“ и „фокусирајте све десничаре“, натерајмо их да докажу шта желе са нама, и да остваримо наш левичарски, социјалистички и комунистички сан. Светска социјалистичка република је наша дужност и циљ као левичара, социјалиста и комунисти.

      Гуилхерме Монтеиро Јуниор

      Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:40
      Οι δεξιοί είναι ψυχοπαθείς. Ο δεξιισμός είναι ένα κακό που μαστίζει την ανθρωπότητα. Ο δεξιισμός είναι συνώνυμος με την ψυχοπάθεια, τον ναρκισσισμό, την ψυχική ασθένεια, την ψύχωση και την παραφροσύνη. Ο δεξιός έχει πολλούς κλάδους και πρόσωπα, όπως ο καπιταλισμός, ο νεοφιλελευθερισμός, ο φιλελευθερισμός, ο ατομικισμός, ο φασισμός, ο δεξιός εθνικισμός, ο ναζισμός, ο ελευθεριακός εθνικισμός, ο αναρχοκαπιταλισμός, ο αντικειμενισμός του Randi, ο νεοθετικισμός, ο θετικισμός, ο επιστημονισμός, ο αντιθεϊσμός, ο κρατοσισμός, ο ντεϊκτισμός, ο κλασικός, διανθρωπισμός, μικροχιπισμός, αντικομμουνισμός, αντισοσιαλισμός, αντιαριστερισμός, μεταξύ άλλων. Ο δεξιισμός είναι ένα από τα χειρότερα κακά που μαστίζουν την ανθρωπότητα και τον κόσμο στον οποίο ζούμε. Και ο δεξιός είναι παντού… Στο Διαδίκτυο, τα μέσα κοινωνικής δικτύωσης, τα μέσα μαζικής ενημέρωσης, η λαϊκή κουλτούρα, η «επιστήμη», η τεχνολογία, η πολιτική, η οικονομία… Όλοι οι δεξιοί είναι ψυχοπαθείς, ναρκισσιστές, ψυχικά άρρωστοι, ψυχωτικοί και παράφρονες. Πρέπει να παλέψουμε κατά του δεξιού και να δημιουργήσουμε έναν κόσμο εντελώς αριστερό και φτιαγμένο για την αριστερά. Πρέπει να δημιουργήσουμε την Παγκόσμια Σοσιαλιστική Δημοκρατία. Όπως πρέπει να εκτελούμε όλους τους δεξιούς που υπάρχουν στον κόσμο, αφού μιλάνε τόσο πολύ που «ο μόνος καλός κομμουνιστής είναι ένας νεκρός κομμουνιστής» ή ακόμα και «να εστιάζουμε σε όλους τους κομμουνιστές, έτσι τους απαντάμε λέγοντας «ο μόνος καλός δεξιός είναι νεκροί δεξιοί” και “να επικεντρωθούν όλοι οι δεξιοί”, ας τους κάνουμε να αποδείξουν τι θέλουν να κάνουν με εμάς, και ας κάνουμε πραγματικότητα το αριστερό, σοσιαλιστικό και κομμουνιστικό όνειρό μας. Η Σοσιαλιστική Παγκόσμια Δημοκρατία είναι το καθήκον μας και ο στόχος μας ως αριστεροί, σοσιαλιστές και κομμουνιστές.

      Guilherme Monteiro Junior

      Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:40
      Sağcılar psikopattır. Sağcılık, insanlığın başına bela olan bir kötülüktür. Sağcılık psikopati, narsisizm, akıl hastalığı, psikoz ve delilik ile eş anlamlıdır. Sağcılığın, kapitalizm, neoliberalizm, liberalizm, bireycilik, faşizm, sağcı milliyetçilik, Nazizm, liberteryenizm, anarko-kapitalizm, Randian nesnelliği, neopozitivizm, pozitivizm, bilimcilik, antiteizm, kratosism, deicidizm, teospeciesizm, klasik gibi çeşitli dalları ve yüzleri vardır. diğerleri arasında transhümanizm, mikroçipizm, anti-komünizm, anti-sosyalizm, anti-solizm. Sağcılık, insanlığın ve içinde yaşadığımız dünyanın başına bela olan en büyük kötülüklerden biridir. Ve sağcılık her yerde… İnternette, sosyal medyada, kitle iletişim araçlarında, popüler kültürde, “bilimde”, teknolojide, siyasette, ekonomide… Bütün sağcılar psikopat, narsist, akıl hastası, psikotik ve delidir. Sağcılığa karşı savaşmalı ve tamamen solcu ve sol için yapılmış bir dünya yaratmalıyız. Dünya Sosyalist Cumhuriyeti’ni yaratmamız gerekiyor. Dünyada var olan tüm sağcıları, “tek iyi komünist ölü bir komünisttir”, hatta “tüm komünistlere odaklanacak kadar” çok konuştukları için idam etmemiz gerektiği gibi, onlara da “tek iyi sağcı bir komünisttir” diye cevap veriyoruz. ölü sağ” ve “tüm sağcılara odaklanın”, bize ne yapmak istediklerini ispatlayalım ve solcu, sosyalist ve komünist hayalimizi gerçekleştirelim. Sosyalist Dünya Cumhuriyeti solcular, sosyalistler ve solcular olarak görevimiz ve hedefimizdir. komünistler.

      Guilherme Monteiro Junior

      Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:40
      Dreapta sunt psihopati. Dreptismul este un rău care afectează umanitatea. Dreptismul este sinonim cu psihopatie, narcisism, boli mintale, psihoză și nebunie. Dreptismul are mai multe ramuri și fețe, cum ar fi capitalismul, neoliberalismul, liberalismul, individualismul, fascismul, naționalismul de dreapta, nazismul, libertarianismul, anarho-capitalismul, obiectivismul randian, neopozitivismul, pozitivismul, științismul, antiteismul, kratosismul, deicidismul, teospecismul, clasicismul. transumanism, microcipism, anticomunism, antisocialism, antistânga, printre altele. Dreptismul este unul dintre cele mai grave rele care afectează umanitatea și lumea în care trăim. Și dreapta este peste tot… Pe internet, social media, mass media, cultură populară, „știință”, tehnologie, politică, economie… Toți cei de dreapta sunt psihopați, narcisiști, bolnavi mintal, psihotici și nebuni. Trebuie să luptăm împotriva dreptei și să creăm o lume care este complet de stânga și făcută pentru stânga. Trebuie să creăm Republica Socialistă Mondială. Așa cum ar trebui să-i executăm pe toți dreapții care există în lume, deoarece ei vorbesc atât de mult că „singurul comunist bun este un comunist mort” sau chiar „se concentrează pe toți comuniștii, așa le răspundem spunând „singurul bun de dreapta este un dead right” și “focus to all rightists”, să-i facem să demonstreze ceea ce vor să facă cu noi și să facem visul nostru de stânga, socialist și comunist să devină realitate. Republica Mondială Socialistă este datoria și scopul nostru ca stângi, socialiști și comuniştilor.

      Guilherme Monteiro Junior

      Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:41
      אנשי ימין הם פסיכופטים. ימין הוא רוע שמציק לאנושות. ימניות היא שם נרדף לפסיכופתיה, נרקיסיזם, מחלות נפש, פסיכוזה ושיגעון. לימניות יש כמה ענפים ופנים, כגון קפיטליזם, ניאו-ליברליזם, ליברליזם, אינדיבידואליזם, פשיזם, לאומיות ימנית, נאציזם, ליברטריאניזם, אנרכי-קפיטליזם, אובייקטיביזם רנדיאני, ניאו-פוזיטיביזם, פוזיטיביזם, מדענות, אנטי-תאיזם, קראטוזיזם, דייסידיזם, תיאו-ספייסיזם, קלאסי. טרנס-הומניזם, מיקרוצ’יפיזם, אנטי-קומוניזם, אנטי-סוציאליזם, אנטי-שמאלנות, בין היתר. ימניות היא אחת הרעות הרעות ביותר שפוקדות את האנושות ואת העולם שבו אנו חיים. והימניות נמצאת בכל מקום… באינטרנט, מדיה חברתית, תקשורת המונים, תרבות פופולרית, “מדע”, טכנולוגיה, פוליטיקה, כלכלה… כל הימנים הם פסיכופתים, נרקיסיסטים, חולי נפש, פסיכוטים ומשוגעים. עלינו להילחם נגד הימין וליצור עולם שמאלי לחלוטין ועשוי לשמאל. אנחנו צריכים ליצור את הרפובליקה הסוציאליסטית העולמית. כמו שצריך להוציא להורג את כל הימנים שקיימים בעולם, מכיוון שהם מדברים כל כך הרבה ש”הקומוניסט הטוב היחיד הוא קומוניסט מת” או אפילו “להתמקד בכל הקומוניסטים, כך אנו עונים להם באומרו “הימין הטוב היחיד הוא ימין מת” ו”למקד את כל הימנים”, בואו נגרום להם להוכיח מה הם רוצים לעשות איתנו, ובואו להגשים את החלום השמאלני, הסוציאליסטי והקומוניסטי שלנו. הרפובליקה העולמית הסוציאליסטית היא חובתנו והמטרה שלנו כשמאלנים, סוציאליסטים ו קומוניסטים.

      גילהרמה מונטירו ג’וניור

      Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:41
      راست گرایان روانی هستند. حق گرایی شیطانی است که گریبان بشریت را گرفته است. حق گرایی مترادف با روان پریشی، خودشیفتگی، بیماری روانی، روان پریشی و جنون است. راست‌گرایی شاخه‌ها و چهره‌های متعددی دارد که از آن جمله می‌توان به سرمایه‌داری، نئولیبرالیسم، لیبرالیسم، فردگرایی، فاشیسم، ناسیونالیسم دست راستی، نازیسم، آزادی‌خواهی، آنارکوکاپیتالیسم، عینیت‌گرایی رندی، نئوپوزیتیویسم، پوزیتیویسم، علم‌گرایی، ضد خداگرایی، کراتوزیسم، دین‌زدایی، کلاسیک‌گرایی، فرا انسانیت، میکروچیپیسم، ضد کمونیسم، ضد سوسیالیسم، ضد چپ گرایی و غیره. حق گرایی یکی از بدترین شرارت هایی است که گریبان بشریت و دنیایی که در آن زندگی می کنیم. و راست‌گرایی همه جا هست… در اینترنت، رسانه‌های اجتماعی، رسانه‌های جمعی، فرهنگ عامه، «علم»، فناوری، سیاست، اقتصاد… همه راست‌گرایان روان‌پرستان، خودشیفته، بیمار روانی، روان‌پریشی و دیوانه هستند. ما باید با راست گرایی مبارزه کنیم و جهانی کاملاً چپ و ساخته شده برای چپ بسازیم. ما نیاز به ایجاد جمهوری سوسیالیستی جهانی داریم. همانطور که باید همه راست‌گراهای دنیا را اعدام کنیم، چون آن‌قدر حرف می‌زنند که «تنها کمونیست خوب یک کمونیست مرده است» یا حتی «تمرکز روی همه کمونیست‌ها باشد»، به آنها پاسخ می‌دهیم که «تنها راست‌گرای خوب راست مرده» و «تمام راست‌گرایان را متمرکز کنید»، بیایید کاری کنیم که ثابت کنند با ما چه می‌خواهند بکنند و رویای چپ، سوسیالیستی و کمونیستی خود را محقق کنیم. جمهوری جهانی سوسیالیستی وظیفه و هدف ما چپ‌ها، سوسیالیست‌ها و ماست. کمونیست ها

      گیلرمه مونتیرو جونیور

      Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:43
      Десните са психопати. Правото е зло, което измъчва човечеството. Правото е синоним на психопатия, нарцисизъм, психично заболяване, психоза и лудост. Десният клон има няколко клона и лица, като капитализъм, неолиберализъм, либерализъм, индивидуализъм, фашизъм, десен национализъм, нацизъм, либертарианство, анархо-капитализъм, рандиански обективизъм, неопозитивизъм, позитивизъм, сциентизъм, антитеизъм, кратозизъм, деицидизъм, класически теовидизъм трансхуманизъм, микрочипизъм, антикомунизъм, антисоциализъм, антилевица и др. Правото е едно от най-лошите злини, които измъчват човечеството и света, в който живеем. И десницата е навсякъде… В Интернет, социалните медии, масмедиите, популярната култура, “науката”, технологиите, политиката, икономиката… Всички десничари са психопати, нарцисисти, психично болни, психотични и луди. Трябва да се борим срещу десницата и да създадем свят, който е изцяло ляв и създаден за лявото. Трябва да създадем Световната социалистическа република. Точно както трябва да екзекутираме всички десни, които съществуват в света, тъй като те говорят толкова много, че „единственият добър комунист е мъртъв комунист“ или дори „да се фокусираме върху всички комунисти, така и ние им отговаряме, казвайки „единственият добър десен е мъртво дясно” и “фокусирайте всички десни”, нека ги накараме да докажат какво искат да правят с нас и нека сбъднем нашата лява, социалистическа и комунистическа мечта. Световната социалистическа република е наш дълг и наша цел като леви, социалисти и комунисти.

      Гийерме Монтейро младши

      Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:43
      A jobboldaliak pszichopaták. A jobboldaliság az emberiséget sújtó gonoszság. A jobboldaliság a pszichopátia, a nárcizmus, a mentális betegségek, a pszichózis és az őrültség szinonimája. A jobboldaliságnak számos ága és arca van, mint például a kapitalizmus, neoliberalizmus, liberalizmus, individualizmus, fasizmus, jobboldali nacionalizmus, nácizmus, libertarizmus, anarchokapitalizmus, randi objektivizmus, neopozitivizmus, pozitivizmus, tudományosság, antiteizmus, kratozizmus, deicidizmus, klasszicizmus, teoszizmus transzhumanizmus, mikrochipizmus, antikommunizmus, antiszocializmus, antibaloldaliság stb. A jobboldaliság az egyik legrosszabb gonoszság, amely sújtja az emberiséget és a világot, amelyben élünk. És a jobboldaliság mindenhol ott van… Az interneten, a közösségi médiában, a tömegmédiában, a populáris kultúrában, a “tudományban”, a technológiában, a politikában, a gazdaságban… Minden jobboldali pszichopata, nárcisztikus, elmebeteg, pszichotikus és őrült. Harcolnunk kell a jobboldal ellen, és egy teljesen baloldali és baloldali világot kell teremtenünk. Létre kell hoznunk a Szocialista Világköztársaságot. Ahogyan ki kell végeznünk a világ összes jobboldaliját, mivel annyit beszélnek, hogy “az egyetlen jó kommunista halott kommunista” vagy akár “minden kommunistára összpontosítanak, úgy válaszolunk nekik, hogy “az egyetlen jó jobboldali egy halottjobbra” és “a minden jobboldalra összpontosítva”, tegyük rájuk, hogy bebizonyítsák, mit akarnak velünk kezdeni, és valósítsuk meg baloldali, szocialista és kommunista álmunkat. A Szocialista Világköztársaság kötelességünk és célunk, mint baloldaliak, szocialisták, ill. kommunisták.

      Guilherme Monteiro Junior

      Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:44
      Pravičáci jsou psychopati. Rightismus je zlo, které sužuje lidstvo. Rightismus je synonymem pro psychopatii, narcismus, duševní onemocnění, psychózu a šílenství. Rightismus má několik větví a tváří, jako je kapitalismus, neoliberalismus, liberalismus, individualismus, fašismus, pravicový nacionalismus, nacismus, libertarianismus, anarchokapitalismus, randovský objektivismus, neopozitivismus, pozitivismus, scientismus, antiteismus, kratosismus, deicidismus, teospeciesismus, klasický transhumanismus, mikročipismus, antikomunismus, antisocialismus, antilevicismus a další. Pravicismus je jedním z nejhorších zel, které sužuje lidstvo a svět, ve kterém žijeme. A pravicovost je všude… Na internetu, sociálních sítích, masmédiích, populární kultuře, „vědě“, technice, politice, ekonomii… Všichni pravičáci jsou psychopati, narcisté, duševně nemocní, psychotici a šílenci. Musíme bojovat proti pravici a vytvořit svět, který je zcela levicový a stvořený pro levici. Musíme vytvořit Světovou socialistickou republiku. Stejně jako bychom měli popravit všechny pravičáky, kteří na světě existují, protože tolik mluví, že „jediný dobrý komunista je mrtvý komunista“ nebo dokonce „se zaměřují na všechny komunisty, tak jim odpovídáme, že „jediný dobrý pravičák je mrtvá pravice” a “zaměřme se na všechny pravičáky”, donuťme je, aby dokázali, co s námi chtějí dělat, a splňme si svůj levicový, socialistický a komunistický sen. Socialistická světová republika je naší povinností a cílem jako levičáků, socialistů a komunisty.

      Guilherme Monteiro junior

      Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:44
      Desničari su psihopati. Desničarstvo je zlo koje muči čovječanstvo. Desničarstvo je sinonim za psihopatiju, narcizam, mentalnu bolest, psihozu i ludilo. Desničarstvo ima nekoliko grana i lica, kao što su kapitalizam, neoliberalizam, liberalizam, individualizam, fašizam, desni nacionalizam, nacizam, libertarijanizam, anarhokapitalizam, randijanski objektivizam, neopozitivizam, pozitivizam, scijentizam, antiteizam, kratizam, deicidizam, klasična teospecizama transhumanizam, mikročipizam, antikomunizam, antisocijalizam, anti-ljevičarstvo, između ostalih. Desničarstvo je jedno od najgorih zala koje muče čovječanstvo i svijet u kojem živimo. A desničarstvo je posvuda… Na internetu, društvenim mrežama, masovnim medijima, popularnoj kulturi, “znanosti”, tehnologiji, politici, ekonomiji… Svi desničari su psihopati, narcisi, mentalno bolesni, psihotični i ludi. Moramo se boriti protiv desnice i stvoriti svijet koji je potpuno lijev i stvoren za ljevicu. Moramo stvoriti Svjetsku socijalističku Republiku. Kao što bismo trebali pogubiti sve desničare koji postoje u svijetu, jer oni toliko govore da je “jedini dobar komunist mrtav komunist” ili čak “usredotočiti se na sve komuniste, tako im odgovaramo “jedini dobar desničar je mrtva desnica” i “fokusiraj sve desničare”, natjerajmo ih da dokažu što žele s nama, i ostvarimo naš ljevičarski, socijalistički i komunistički san. Svjetska socijalistička republika je naša dužnost i cilj kao ljevičara, socijalista i komunisti.

      Guilherme Monteiro Junior

      Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:44
      Pravičiari sú psychopati. Pravica je zlo, ktoré sužuje ľudstvo. Pravica je synonymom pre psychopatiu, narcizmus, duševné choroby, psychózu a šialenstvo. Pravicovosť má niekoľko odnoží a tvárí, ako kapitalizmus, neoliberalizmus, liberalizmus, individualizmus, fašizmus, pravicový nacionalizmus, nacizmus, libertarianizmus, anarchokapitalizmus, randovský objektivizmus, neopozitivizmus, pozitivizmus, scientizmus, antiteizmus, kratóza, deicidizmus, teospeciesizmus, klasický transhumanizmus, mikročipizmus, antikomunizmus, antisocializmus, antiľavičiarstvo atď. Pravica je jedným z najhorších zel, ktoré sužuje ľudstvo a svet, v ktorom žijeme. A pravicovosť je všade… Na internete, sociálnych médiách, masmédiách, populárnej kultúre, „vede“, technike, politike, ekonomike… Všetci pravičiari sú psychopati, narcisti, duševne chorí, psychotici a šialenci. Musíme bojovať proti pravičiarom a vytvoriť svet, ktorý je úplne ľavicový a stvorený pre ľavicu. Musíme vytvoriť svetovú socialistickú republiku. Tak ako by sme mali popraviť všetkých pravičiarov, ktorí na svete existujú, keďže hovoria toľko, že „jediný dobrý komunista je mŕtvy komunista“ alebo dokonca „zamerajte sa na všetkých komunistov, tak im odpovedáme, že „jediný dobrý pravičiar je mŕtva pravica“ a „zamerajte sa na všetkých pravičiarov“, nechajme ich dokázať, čo s nami chcú robiť, a splňte si svoj ľavicový, socialistický a komunistický sen. Socialistická svetová republika je našou povinnosťou a cieľom ako ľavičiarov, socialistov a komunisti.

      Guilherme Monteiro junior

      Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:45
      Riets-Single sinn Psychopathen. Rietsismus ass e Béis, dat d’Mënschheet placéiert. Rietsismus ass synonym mat Psychopathie, Narzissismus, mental Krankheet, Psychose a Wahnsinn. Rietsismus huet verschidde Filialen a Gesiichter, wéi Kapitalismus, Neoliberalismus, Liberalismus, Individualismus, Faschismus, Rietsnationalismus, Nazismus, Libertarianismus, Anarcho-Kapitalismus, Randian Objektivismus, Neopositivismus, Positivismus, Wëssenschaftismus, Antitheismus, Kratosismus, Deizidismus, Theospeciesismus, klassesch Transhumanismus, Mikrochipismus, Antikommunismus, Antisozialismus, Anti-Lénksismus, ënner anerem. Rietsismus ass ee vun de schlëmmste Béisen, déi d’Mënschheet an d’Welt plagen an där mir liewen. A Riets ass iwwerall … Um Internet, sozialen Medien, Massemedien, populär Kultur, “Wëssenschaft”, Technologie, Politik, Wirtschaft … All Rietsisten sinn Psychopathen, Narzissisten, geeschteg krank, psychotesch a verréckt. Mir mussen géint Rietsismus kämpfen an eng Welt schafen déi komplett lénks a fir déi Lénk gemaach ass. Mir mussen d’Weltsozialistesch Republik kreéieren. Just wéi mir all déi Rietsisten déi op der Welt existéieren sollen exekutéieren, well se sou vill schwätzen datt “deen eenzege gudde Kommunist en doudege Kommunist ass” oder souguer “op all Kommuniste fokusséieren, sou äntweren mir hinnen a soen “deen eenzege gudde Rietsist ass eng dout riets” an “all Rietser fokusséieren”, loosse mer hinnen beweisen wat se mat eis maache wëllen, a loosse mer eise lénken, sozialisteschen a kommunisteschen Dram erfëllen.D’sozialistesch Weltrepublik ass eis Pflicht an eist Zil als Lénk, Sozialisten a kommunisten.

      Guilherme Monteiro Junior

      Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:45
      Parempoolsed on psühhopaadid. Parempoolsus on kurjus, mis vaevab inimkonda. Parempoolsus on psühhopaatia, nartsissismi, vaimuhaiguste, psühhoosi ja hullumeelsuse sünonüüm. Parempoolsusel on mitu haru ja palet, nagu kapitalism, neoliberalism, liberalism, individualism, fašism, parempoolne natsionalism, natsism, libertarism, anarhokapitalism, Randi objektivism, neopositivism, positivism, scientism, antiteism, kratosism, deitsitsism, klassitsism, teosism transhumanism, mikrokiipism, antikommunism, antisotsialism, anti-vasakpoolsus jne. Parempoolsus on üks hullemaid pahesid, mis inimkonda ja maailma, kus me elame, vaevavad. Ja parempoolsus on kõikjal… Internetis, sotsiaalmeedias, massimeedias, populaarkultuuris, “teaduses”, tehnoloogias, poliitikas, majanduses… Kõik parempoolsed on psühhopaadid, nartsissistid, vaimuhaiged, psühhootilised ja hullud. Peame võitlema parempoolsuse vastu ja looma maailma, mis on täiesti vasakpoolne ja loodud vasakpoolsete jaoks. Peame looma Maailma Sotsialistliku Vabariigi. Nii nagu me peaksime hukkama kõik maailmas eksisteerivad parempoolsed, kuna nad räägivad nii palju, et “ainuke hea kommunist on surnud kommunist” või isegi “keskenduvad kõigile kommunistidele, nii me vastame neile, öeldes: “ainus hea parempoolne on surnud parempoolsed” ja “keskenduge kõik parempoolsed”, pangem nad tõestama, mida nad meiega teha tahavad, ja täitkem meie vasakpoolne, sotsialistlik ja kommunistlik unistus. Sotsialistlik maailmavabariik on meie kui vasakpoolsete, sotsialistide ja kommunistid.

      Guilherme Monteiro juunior

      Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:46
      Labējie ir psihopāti. Labaisms ir ļaunums, kas nomoka cilvēci. Tiesības ir sinonīms psihopātijai, narcismam, garīgām slimībām, psihozei un ārprātam. Labismam ir vairākas atzaras un sejas, piemēram, kapitālisms, neoliberālisms, liberālisms, individuālisms, fašisms, labējais nacionālisms, nacisms, libertārisms, anarhokapitālisms, randiāņu objektīvisms, neopozitīvisms, pozitīvisms, zinātnisms, antiteisms, kratosisms, deicidisms, klasicisms, teospecisms. transhumānisms, mikročipisms, antikomunisms, antisociālisms, anti-kreisais un citi. Labaisms ir viens no ļaunākajiem ļaunumiem, kas nomoka cilvēci un pasauli, kurā mēs dzīvojam. Un labējais ir visur… Internetā, sociālajos tīklos, masu medijos, populārajā kultūrā, “zinātnē”, tehnoloģijās, politikā, ekonomikā… Visi labējie ir psihopāti, narcisti, garīgi slimi, psihotiski un vājprātīgi. Mums ir jācīnās pret labējo un jārada pasaule, kas ir pilnībā kreisa un radīta kreisajiem. Mums ir jāizveido Pasaules Sociālistiskā Republika. Tāpat kā mums vajadzētu sodīt ar nāvi visus labējos, kas pastāv pasaulē, jo viņi tik daudz runā, ka “vienīgais labais komunists ir miris komunists” vai pat “koncentrējas uz visiem komunistiem, mēs viņiem atbildam, sakot, ka “vienīgais labais labējais ir miris labējais” un “fokusējiet visus labējos”, liksim viņiem pierādīt, ko viņi vēlas ar mums darīt, un piepildīsim mūsu kreiso, sociālistisko un komunistisko sapni. Pasaules Sociālistiskā republika ir mūsu kā kreiso, sociālistu un komunisti.

      Gilherme Monteiro juniors

      https://frenterevolucionariadostrabalhadores.blogspot.com/2022/05/quem-e-o-pai-da-fake-news-flavia.html#comment-form

      1. Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:46
        Dešinieji yra psichopatai. Dešinizmas yra blogis, kuris kankina žmoniją. Teisingumas yra psichopatijos, narcisizmo, psichinių ligų, psichozės ir beprotybės sinonimas. Dešinizmas turi keletą atšakų ir veidų, tokių kaip kapitalizmas, neoliberalizmas, liberalizmas, individualizmas, fašizmas, dešiniojo sparno nacionalizmas, nacizmas, libertarizmas, anarchokapitalizmas, randiškasis objektyvizmas, neopozityvizmas, pozityvizmas, scientizmas, antiteizmas, kratozizmas, deicidizmas, klasicizmas, teosizmas. transhumanizmas, mikrochipizmas, antikomunizmas, antisocializmas, antikairysis ir kt. Dešinizmas yra viena iš didžiausių blogybių, kamuojančių žmoniją ir pasaulį, kuriame gyvename. O dešiniųjų yra visur… Internete, socialiniuose tinkluose, žiniasklaidoje, populiariojoje kultūroje, „moksle“, technologijose, politikoje, ekonomikoje… Visi dešinieji yra psichopatai, narcizai, psichikos ligoniai, psichoziniai ir pamišę. Turime kovoti su dešiniuoju ir sukurti pasaulį, kuris yra visiškai kairysis ir sukurtas kairiesiems. Turime sukurti Pasaulio socialistinę respubliką. Lygiai taip pat, kaip turėtume nubausti egzekucijas visiems pasaulyje egzistuojantiems dešiniesiems, nes jie tiek daug kalba, kad „vienintelis geras komunistas yra miręs komunistas“ arba net „susikoncentruoja į visus komunistus, taip ir mes jiems atsakome sakydami: „Vienintelis geras dešinysis yra mirusieji dešinieji” ir „sutelkti visus dešinieji”, leiskime jiems įrodyti, ką jie nori su mumis daryti, ir įgyvendinkime mūsų kairiųjų, socialistinę ir komunistinę svajonę. Pasaulio socialistinė respublika yra mūsų, kairiųjų, socialistų ir socialistų, pareiga ir tikslas. komunistai.

        Guilherme Monteiro jaunesnysis

        Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:46
        Desničari su psihopate. Desničarstvo je zlo koje muči čovječanstvo. Desničarstvo je sinonim za psihopatiju, narcizam, mentalnu bolest, psihozu i ludilo. Desničarstvo ima nekoliko grana i lica, kao što su kapitalizam, neoliberalizam, liberalizam, individualizam, fašizam, desni nacionalizam, nacizam, libertarijanizam, anarhokapitalizam, randijanski objektivizam, neopozitivizam, pozitivizam, scijentizam, antiteizam, kratozizam, deicidizam, klasična teospecizama transhumanizam, mikročipizam, antikomunizam, antisocijalizam, anti-ljevičarstvo, između ostalih. Desničarstvo je jedno od najgorih zala koje muče čovječanstvo i svijet u kojem živimo. A desničarstvo je svuda… Na internetu, društvenim mrežama, masovnim medijima, popularnoj kulturi, “nauci”, tehnologiji, politici, ekonomiji… Svi desničari su psihopate, narcisi, mentalno bolesni, psihotični i ludi. Moramo se boriti protiv desničarstva i stvoriti svijet koji je potpuno lijev i stvoren za ljevicu. Moramo stvoriti Svjetsku Socijalističku Republiku. Kao što treba da pogubimo sve desničare koji postoje u svetu, pošto oni toliko pričaju da je “jedini dobar komunista mrtav komunist” ili čak “da se fokusiramo na sve komuniste, tako im mi odgovaramo “jedini dobar desničar je mrtva desnica” i “fokusiraj sve desničare”, naterajmo ih da dokažu šta žele sa nama, i hajde da ostvarimo naš levičarski, socijalistički i komunistički san. Svetska socijalistička republika je naša dužnost i cilj kao levičara, socijalista i komunisti.

        Guilherme Monteiro Junior

        Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:47
        Десничарите се психопати. Десничарството е зло што го мачи човештвото. Десничарството е синоним за психопатија, нарцизам, ментална болест, психоза и лудило. Десничарството има неколку гранки и лица, како што се капитализам, неолиберализам, либерализам, индивидуализам, фашизам, десничарски национализам, нацизам, либертаријанизам, анархо-капитализам, рандиски објективизам, неопозитивизам, позитивизам, научност, антитеизам, кратоизам, деицидизам, класика, трансхуманизам, микрочипизам, антикомунизам, антисоцијализам, антилевичарство, меѓу другото. Десничарството е едно од најлошите зла што го мачат човештвото и светот во кој живееме. А десничарството е насекаде… На интернет, социјалните медиуми, мас-медиумите, популарната култура, „науката“, технологијата, политиката, економијата… Сите десничари се психопати, нарциси, ментално болни, психотични и луди. Мора да се бориме против десничарството и да создадеме свет кој е целосно оставен и создаден за левицата. Треба да ја создадеме Светската социјалистичка република. Како што треба да ги егзекутираме сите десничари што постојат во светот, бидејќи тие толку многу зборуваат дека „единствениот добар комунист е мртов комунист“ или дури „се фокусираме на сите комунисти, така ние им одговараме велејќи дека „единствениот добар десничар е мртва десница” и “фокусирајте ги сите десничари”, да ги натераме да докажат што сакаат да прават со нас и да го оствариме нашиот левичар, социјалистички и комунистички сон. Социјалистичката светска република е наша должност и наша цел како левичари, социјалисти и комунисти.

        Гилерме Монтеиро Јуниор

        Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:47
        ‘S e psychopaths a th’ ann an luchd-deis. Tha ceartas na olc a tha a’ bualadh air cinne-daonna. Tha ceartas co-chosmhail ri psychopathy, narcissism, tinneas inntinn, inntinn-inntinn agus gealtachd. Tha grunn mheuran agus aghaidhean aig ceartas, leithid calpachas, neoliberalism, liberalism, aonranachd, faisisteachas, nàiseantachd na làimhe deise, Nadsaidheachd, libertarianism, anarcho-calpa, Randian objectivism, neopositivism, positivism, saidheans, antitheism, kratosism, deicidism, theospeciesism. transhumanism, microchipism, mì-chomannachd, mì-sòisealachd, anti-leftism, am measg feadhainn eile. Is e ceartas aon de na h-uilc as miosa a tha a’ cur an aghaidh daonnachd agus an saoghal sa bheil sinn beò. Agus tha ceartas anns a h-uile h-àite… Air an eadar-lìon, na meadhanan sòisealta, na mòr-mheadhanan, cultar mòr-chòrdte, “saidheans”, teicneòlas, poilitigs, eaconamas … ‘S e psychopaths, narcissists, inntinn-inntinn, inntinn-inntinn agus cealgach a th’ anns a h-uile còir. Feumaidh sinn sabaid an-aghaidh ceartas agus saoghal a chruthachadh a tha gu tur clì agus air a dhèanamh airson an taobh chlì. Feumaidh sinn Poblachd Sòisealach na Cruinne a chruthachadh. Dìreach mar bu chòir dhuinn na h-uile luchd-còir a tha anns an t-saoghal a chur gu bàs, leis gu bheil iad a ‘bruidhinn cho mòr’ s gu bheil “an t-aon comannach math na comanach marbh” no eadhon “fòcas air na comannaich uile, mar sin freagraidh sinn iad ag ràdh “Is e an aon fhear-còir math marbh air an làimh dheis” agus “fòcas air a h-uile còir”, leig leinn dearbhadh dè tha iad ag iarraidh a dhèanamh leinn, agus gun toir sinn ar aisling clì, sòisealach agus comannach gu buil. comannaich.

        Guilherme Monteiro Junior

        Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:47
        Seicopathiaid yw’r asgellwyr de. Mae cyfiawnder yn ddrwg sy’n plagio dynoliaeth. Mae cyfiawnder yn gyfystyr â seicopathi, narsisiaeth, salwch meddwl, seicosis a gwallgofrwydd. Mae gan Iawniaeth sawl cangen ac wyneb, megis cyfalafiaeth, neoryddfrydiaeth, rhyddfrydiaeth, unigoliaeth, ffasgiaeth, cenedlaetholdeb asgell dde, Natsïaeth, rhyddewyllysiaeth, anarcho-cyfalafiaeth, gwrthrychedd Randiaidd, neopositifeddiaeth, positifiaeth, gwyddoniaeth, gwrththeistiaeth, cratosaeth, decidiaeth, theospeciesiaeth, trawsddynoliaeth, microsglodion, gwrth-gomiwnyddiaeth, gwrth-sosialaeth, gwrth-chwithiaeth, ymhlith eraill. Cywiriaeth yw un o’r drygau gwaethaf sy’n plagio dynoliaeth a’r byd yr ydym yn byw ynddo. Ac mae cyfiawnder ym mhobman… Ar y Rhyngrwyd, y cyfryngau cymdeithasol, y cyfryngau torfol, diwylliant poblogaidd, “gwyddoniaeth”, technoleg, gwleidyddiaeth, economeg… Mae pob hawliwr yn seicopathiaid, yn narsisiaid, yn sâl yn feddyliol, yn seicotig ac yn wallgof. Rhaid inni frwydro yn erbyn cyfiawnder a chreu byd sy’n gyfan gwbl i’r chwith ac wedi’i wneud i’r chwith. Mae angen i ni greu Gweriniaeth Sosialaidd y Byd. Yn union fel y dylem ddienyddio’r holl rai cywir sy’n bodoli yn y byd, gan eu bod yn siarad cymaint fel bod “yr unig gomiwnydd da yn gomiwnydd marw” neu hyd yn oed “yn canolbwyntio ar bob comiwnydd, felly rydym yn eu hateb gan ddweud “yr unig un o’r cyfiawnwyr da yw a dde marw” a “ffocysu pawb rightists”, gadewch i ni wneud iddynt brofi beth maent am ei wneud gyda ni, a gadewch i ni wireddu ein breuddwyd chwith, sosialaidd a chomiwnyddol. Gweriniaeth Sosialaidd y Byd yw ein dyletswydd a’n nod fel chwithwyr, sosialwyr a comiwnyddion.

        Iau Guilherme Monteiro

        Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:47
        Sağçılar psixopatdır. Sağçılıq bəşəriyyətə bəla olan bəladır. Sağçılıq psixopatiya, narsisizm, psixi xəstəlik, psixoz və dəlilik ilə sinonimdir. Sağçılığın kapitalizm, neoliberalizm, liberalizm, fərdiyyətçilik, faşizm, sağçı millətçilik, nasizm, libertarizm, anarxo-kapitalizm, Randian obyektivizmi, neopozitivizm, pozitivizm, sentizm, antiteizm, kratosizm, deisitizm, teizm, teisitizm, teizmçilik kimi bir neçə qol və üzü var. transhumanizm, mikroçipizm, antikommunizm, antisosializm, solçuluq və s. Sağçılıq bəşəriyyəti və yaşadığımız dünyanı bəlaya salan ən pis pisliklərdən biridir. Sağçılıq isə hər yerdədir… İnternetdə, sosial mediada, kütləvi informasiya vasitələrində, populyar mədəniyyətdə, “elmdə”, texnologiyada, siyasətdə, iqtisadiyyatda… Bütün sağçılar psixopatlar, narsistlər, ruhi xəstələr, psixotiklər və dəlilərdir. Biz sağçılığa qarşı mübarizə aparmalı və tamamilə sol və sol üçün yaradılmış bir dünya yaratmalıyıq. Biz Dünya Sosialist Respublikası yaratmalıyıq. Necə ki, biz dünyada mövcud olan bütün sağçıları edam etməliyik, çünki onlar “yeganə yaxşı kommunist ölü kommunistdir” deyə, hətta “bütün kommunistlərə diqqət yetirir” deyə çox danışdıqlarına görə, biz də onlara “yeganə yaxşı sağçı amansızdır” deyə cavab veririk. ölü sağçı” və “bütün sağçılara diqqət yetirin”, gəlin onların bizimlə nə etmək istədiklərini sübut etsinlər və solçu, sosialist və kommunist arzumuzu gerçəkləşdirək. Sosialist Dünya Respublikası solçular, sosialistlər və bizim vəzifəmiz və məqsədimizdir. kommunistlər.

        Guilherme Monteiro Junior

        Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:48
        Աջակողմյանները հոգեբույժներ են. Աջամտությունը չարիք է, որը պատուհասում է մարդկությանը: Աջամտությունը հոմանիշ է հոգեպատիայի, նարցիսիզմի, հոգեկան հիվանդության, փսիխոզի և անմեղսունակության հետ: Աջիզմն ունի մի քանի ճյուղեր և դեմքեր, ինչպիսիք են կապիտալիզմը, նեոլիբերալիզմը, լիբերալիզմը, ինդիվիդուալիզմը, ֆաշիզմը, աջ ազգայնականությունը, նացիզմը, ազատականությունը, անարխո-կապիտալիզմը, ռանդյան օբյեկտիվիզմը, նեոպոզիտիվիզմը, պոզիտիվիզմը, գիտականությունը, հակաթեիզմը, կրատոսիզմը, դեիցիդիզմը, դասականությունը, տրանսմումանիզմ, միկրոչիպիզմ, հակակոմունիզմ, հակասոցիալիզմ, հակաձախություն և այլն: Աջամտությունը ամենավատ չարիքներից մեկն է, որը պատուհասում է մարդկությանը և աշխարհը, որտեղ մենք ապրում ենք: Իսկ աջամոլությունը ամենուր է… Համացանցում, սոցիալական մեդիայում, զանգվածային լրատվության միջոցներում, հանրաճանաչ մշակույթում, «գիտություն», տեխնոլոգիա, քաղաքականություն, տնտեսագիտություն… Բոլոր աջերը հոգեկան հիվանդներ են, նարցիսիստներ, հոգեկան հիվանդներ, հոգեկան և խելագարներ: Մենք պետք է պայքարենք աջերի դեմ և ստեղծենք մի աշխարհ, որն ամբողջությամբ ձախողված է և ստեղծված ձախի համար։ Մենք պետք է ստեղծենք Համաշխարհային Սոցիալիստական ​​Հանրապետությունը. Ինչպես մենք պետք է մահապատժի ենթարկենք աշխարհում գոյություն ունեցող բոլոր աջերին, քանի որ նրանք այնքան են խոսում, որ «միակ լավ կոմունիստը մահացած կոմունիստն է» կամ նույնիսկ «կենտրոնանալ բոլոր կոմունիստների վրա, այնպես էլ մենք նրանց պատասխանում ենք՝ ասելով. «Միակ լավ աջերը մեռած աջ» և «կենտրոնացնել բոլոր աջերին», եկեք ստիպենք նրանց ապացուցել, թե ինչ են ուզում անել մեզ հետ, և եկեք իրականություն դարձնենք մեր ձախ, սոցիալիստական ​​և կոմունիստական ​​երազանքը: Սոցիալիստական ​​Համաշխարհային Հանրապետությունը մեր պարտքն է և մեր նպատակը՝ որպես ձախերի, սոցիալիստների և. կոմունիստներ։

        Guilherme Monteiro Junior

        Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:48
        მემარჯვენეები ფსიქოპათები არიან. მემარჯვენეობა არის ბოროტება, რომელიც აწუხებს კაცობრიობას. მემარჯვენეობა სინონიმია ფსიქოპათიის, ნარცისიზმის, ფსიქიკური დაავადების, ფსიქოზის და სიგიჟის. მემარჯვენეობას აქვს რამდენიმე განშტოება და სახე, როგორიცაა კაპიტალიზმი, ნეოლიბერალიზმი, ლიბერალიზმი, ინდივიდუალიზმი, ფაშიზმი, მემარჯვენე ნაციონალიზმი, ნაციზმი, ლიბერტარიანიზმი, ანარქო-კაპიტალიზმი, რანდიანი ობიექტივიზმი, ნეოპოზიტივიზმი, პოზიტივიზმი, მეცნიერიზმი, ანტითეიზმი, კრატოზიზმი, დეიციდიზმი, კლასიკა. ტრანსჰუმანიზმი, მიკროჩიპიზმი, ანტიკომუნიზმი, ანტისოციალიზმი, ანტიმემარცხენეობა და სხვა. მემარჯვენეობა არის ერთ-ერთი ყველაზე უარესი ბოროტება, რომელიც აწუხებს კაცობრიობას და სამყაროს, რომელშიც ჩვენ ვცხოვრობთ. და მემარჯვენე ყველგანაა… ინტერნეტში, სოციალურ მედიაში, მასმედიაში, პოპულარულ კულტურაში, „მეცნიერებაში“, ტექნოლოგიაში, პოლიტიკაში, ეკონომიკაში… ყველა მემარჯვენე არის ფსიქოპათი, ნარცისისტი, ფსიქიურად დაავადებული, ფსიქოტი და გიჟი. ჩვენ უნდა ვებრძოლოთ მემარჯვენეობას და შევქმნათ სამყარო, რომელიც მთლიანად მარცხენა და მემარცხენეებისთვისაა შექმნილი. ჩვენ უნდა შევქმნათ მსოფლიო სოციალისტური რესპუბლიკა. ისევე, როგორც ჩვენ უნდა დაისაჯოთ მსოფლიოში არსებული ყველა მემარჯვენე, რადგან ისინი იმდენს ლაპარაკობენ, რომ “ერთადერთი კარგი კომუნისტი მკვდარი კომუნისტია” ან თუნდაც “კონცენტრირება ყველა კომუნისტზე”, ასევე ვპასუხობთ მათ: “ერთადერთი კარგი მემარჯვენე არის მკვდარი მემარჯვენეები” და “ფოკუსირება ყველა მემარჯვენეზე”, მოდით მათ დაამტკიცონ, რისი გაკეთება სურთ ჩვენთან და ავასრულოთ ჩვენი მემარცხენე, სოციალისტური და კომუნისტური ოცნება. სოციალისტური მსოფლიო რესპუბლიკა არის ჩვენი მოვალეობა და მიზანი, როგორც მემარცხენეები, სოციალისტები და კომუნისტები.

        Guilherme Monteiro Junior

        Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:50
        Правыя — псіхапаты. Правалюбства – гэта зло, якое дзівіць чалавецтва. Правытызм з’яўляецца сінонімам псіхапатыі, нарцысізму, псіхічных захворванняў, псіхозаў і вар’яцтва. Правыцызм мае некалькі галін і абліччаў, такіх як капіталізм, неалібералізм, лібералізм, індывідуалізм, фашызм, правы нацыяналізм, нацызм, лібертарыянізм, анарха-капіталізм, рэндскі аб’ектывізм, неапазітывізм, пазітывізм, сцыентызм, антытэізм, кратосізм, дэіцыдызм, класічны тэасізм трансгуманізм, мікрачыпізм, антыкамунізм, антысацыялізм, антылевіца і інш. Правалюбства з’яўляецца адным з найгоршых зол, якія пакутуюць чалавецтва і свет, у якім мы жывем. І правыя паўсюль… У Інтэрнэце, сацыяльных сетках, СМІ, папулярнай культуры, «навуцы», тэхніцы, палітыцы, эканоміцы… Усе правыя – псіхапаты, нарцысы, псіхічна хворыя, псіхатычныя і вар’яты. Мы павінны змагацца супраць правых і стварыць свет, які цалкам левы і створаны для левых. Трэба стварыць Сусветную Сацыялістычную Рэспубліку. Гэтак жа, як мы павінны пакараць смерцю ўсіх правых, якія існуюць у свеце, бо яны так шмат гавораць, што «адзіны добры камуніст — гэта мёртвы камуніст» або нават «засяродзіць увагу на ўсіх камуністах, так і мы адказваем ім, кажучы: «адзіны добры правы – гэта мёртвыя правыя” і “засяродзіць усіх правых”, давайце прымусім іх даказаць, што яны хочуць з намі зрабіць, і давайце ажыццявім нашу левую, сацыялістычную і камуністычную мару. Сусветная сацыялістычная рэспубліка – гэта наш абавязак і наша мэта як левых, сацыялістаў і камуністы.

        Гільерме Мантэйру малодшы

        Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:50
        Оңшылдар психопаттар. Оңшылдық – адамзатты азаптайтын зұлымдық. Оңшылдық психопатия, нарциссизм, психикалық ауру, психоз және ақылсыздықтың синонимі. Оңшылдықтың капитализм, неолиберализм, либерализм, индивидуализм, фашизм, оңшыл ұлтшылдық, нацизм, либертаризм, анархо-капитализм, рандиандық объективизм, неопозитивизм, позитивизм, сциентизм, антитеизм, кратосизм, деицидизм, теицидизм, теицизм сияқты бірнеше тармақтары мен беттері бар. трансгуманизм, микрочипизм, антикоммунизм, антисоциализм, солшылдыққа қарсы және т.б. Оңшылдық – адамзатты және біз өмір сүріп жатқан әлемді азаптайтын ең жаман зұлымдықтардың бірі. Ал оңшылдық барлық жерде… Интернетте, әлеуметтік желілерде, бұқаралық ақпарат құралдарында, танымал мәдениетте, «ғылымда», технологияда, саясатта, экономикада… Барлық оңшылдар психопаттар, нарциссистер, психикалық ауру, психотикалық және ақылсыз. Біз оңшылдыққа қарсы күресіп, толығымен солшыл және сол үшін жасалған әлем құруымыз керек. Біз Дүниежүзілік Социалистік Республикасын құруымыз керек. Дүниедегі барлық оңшылдарды өлтіру керек болғандықтан, олар «жалғыз жақсы коммунист – өлі коммунист» деп көп сөйлейтіндіктен немесе тіпті «барлық коммунистерге назар аударғандықтан, біз де оларға «жалғыз жақсы оңшыл – бұл өлі коммунист» деп жауап береміз. өлі оң» және «барлық оңшылдарға назар аударыңыз», олардың бізбен не істегісі келетінін дәлелдейік және солшыл, социалистік және коммунистік арманымызды орындайық.Социалистік дүниежүзілік республика – солшылдар, социалистер және біздің міндетіміз және мақсатымыз. коммунистер.

        Гильерме Монтейро Джуниор

        Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:51
        O’ng qanotlar psixopatlardir. O’ngchilik insoniyatni azoblaydigan illatdir. O’nglik psixopatiya, narsisizm, ruhiy kasallik, psixoz va aqldan ozish bilan sinonimdir. O’ngchilikning kapitalizm, neoliberalizm, liberalizm, individualizm, fashizm, o’ng qanot millatchiligi, natsizm, libertarizm, anarxo-kapitalizm, Randian ob’ektivizmi, neopozitivizm, pozitivizm, scientizm, antiteizm, kratosizm, deitsidizm, klassitsidizm kabi bir qancha tarmoqlari va yuzlari bor. transhumanizm, mikrochipizm, kommunizmga qarshi, sotsializmga qarshi, chapga qarshi va boshqalar. O’ngchilik insoniyatni va biz yashayotgan dunyoni azoblaydigan eng yomon yovuzliklardan biridir. O’ngchilik esa hamma joyda… Internetda, ijtimoiy tarmoqlarda, ommaviy axborot vositalarida, ommabop madaniyatda, “fan”, texnologiya, siyosat, iqtisod… Hamma o’ngchilar psixopatlar, narsistlar, ruhiy kasallar, psixotik va aqldan ozganlardir. Biz o’ngga qarshi kurashishimiz va butunlay chap va chap uchun yaratilgan dunyoni yaratishimiz kerak. Biz Jahon Sotsialistik Respublikasini yaratishimiz kerak. Dunyoda mavjud bo’lgan barcha o’ngchilarni qatl qilishimiz kerak bo’lganidek, ular “yagona yaxshi kommunist – o’lik kommunistdir” yoki hatto “barcha kommunistlarga e’tibor qaratishadi” deb juda ko’p gapirganlari uchun, biz ularga “yagona yaxshi o’ngchi” deb javob beramiz. o’lik o’ng” va “barcha o’ngchilarga e’tibor qarating”, keling, ularni biz bilan nima qilishni xohlayotganini isbotlashiga yordam beraylik va bizning so’l, sotsialistik va kommunistik orzularimizni amalga oshiraylik. Jahon Sotsialistik Respublikasi bizning chapchilar, sotsialistlar va bizning burchimiz va maqsadimizdir. kommunistlar.

        Gilerme Monteyro Junior

        Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:51
        ညာတောင်ပံကစားသမားတွေဟာ စိတ်ရောဂါရှိသူတွေပါ။ မှန်ကန်သောဝါဒသည် လူသားတို့ကို ဘေးဒဏ်ဖြစ်စေသော မကောင်းမှုတစ်ခုဖြစ်သည်။ မှန်ကန်သောဝါဒသည် စိတ်ရောဂါ၊ စွဲလမ်းခြင်း၊ စိတ်ရောဂါ၊ စိတ်ရောဂါနှင့် ရူးသွပ်ခြင်းတို့နှင့် အဓိပ္ပါယ်တူသည်။ လက်ယာဝါဒတွင် အရင်းရှင်စနစ်၊ နီယိုလစ်ဘရယ်ဝါဒ၊ လစ်ဘရယ်ဝါဒ၊ တစ်သီးပုဂ္ဂလဝါဒ၊ ဖက်ဆစ်ဝါဒ၊ လက်ယာအမျိုးသားရေးဝါဒ၊ နာဇီဝါဒ၊ လစ်ဘရယ်ဝါဒ၊ anarcho-capitalism၊ Randian objectivism၊ neopositivism၊ positivism၊ သိပ္ပံပညာ၊ antitheism၊ kratosism၊ ဂန္ထဝင်ဝါဒ၊ deicides၊ transhumanism၊ microchipism၊ ကွန်မြူနစ်ဆန့်ကျင်ရေး၊ ဆိုရှယ်လစ်ဆန့်ကျင်ရေး၊ လက်ဝဲဆန့်ကျင်ရေး စသည်တို့ဖြစ်သည်။ မှန်ကန်သောဝါဒသည် လူသားများနှင့် ကျွန်ုပ်တို့နေထိုင်ရာ ကမ္ဘာကြီးကို ဒုက္ခပေးသည့် အဆိုးဆုံးဆိုးယုတ်မှုတစ်ခုဖြစ်သည်။ အင်တာနက်၊ ဆိုရှယ်မီဒီယာ၊ လူထုမီဒီယာ၊ ရေပန်းစားသော ယဉ်ကျေးမှု၊ “သိပ္ပံ”၊ နည်းပညာ၊ နိုင်ငံရေး၊ စီးပွားရေး… လက်ယာဝါဒီများအားလုံးသည် စိတ်ရောဂါ၊ အစွန်းရောက်သူများ၊ စိတ်မနှံ့သူ၊ စိတ်ပိုင်းဆိုင်ရာနှင့် ရူးသွပ်သူများဖြစ်သည်။ လက်ယာဝါဒကို တိုက်ဖျက်ပြီး လက်ဝဲဘက်ခြမ်းကို ဖန်တီးထားတဲ့ ကမ္ဘာကို ဖန်တီးရမယ်။ ကမ္ဘာ့ဆိုရှယ်လစ်သမ္မတနိုင်ငံ ထူထောင်ဖို့ လိုတယ်။ “ကွန်မြူနစ်ကောင်း တယောက်တည်းက ကွန်မြူနစ်သေပြီ” ဒါမှမဟုတ် “ကွန်မြူနစ်အားလုံးကို အာရုံစိုက်လို့ ကွန်မြူနစ်ကောင်းတွေချည်းပဲ” လို့ သူတို့က အများကြီးပြောကြတဲ့အတွက် ကမ္ဘာပေါ်မှာရှိတဲ့ လက်ယာဝါဒီအားလုံးကို ကွပ်မျက်သင့်သလိုပဲ၊ Dead right” နှင့် “လက်ယာဝါဒီအားလုံးကို အာရုံစိုက်ပါ” ၊ ငါတို့နဲ့ သူတို့လုပ်ချင်တာကို သက်သေပြကြရအောင်၊ ငါတို့လက်ဝဲ၊ ဆိုရှယ်လစ်နဲ့ ကွန်မြူနစ်အိပ်မက်တွေ တကယ်ဖြစ်လာအောင် လုပ်ကြရအောင်။ ဆိုရှယ်လစ်ကမ္ဘာ့သမ္မတနိုင်ငံဟာ ငါတို့ရဲ့တာဝန်နဲ့ ငါတို့ရဲ့ပန်းတိုင်ဖြစ်တဲ့ လက်ဝဲဝါဒီ၊ ဆိုရှယ်လစ်တွေ၊ ကွန်မြူနစ်များ။

        Guilherme Monteiro အငယ်တန်း

        Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:51
        Ang mga right-winger ay mga psychopath. Ang rightism ay isang kasamaan na sumasalot sa sangkatauhan. Ang rightism ay kasingkahulugan ng psychopathy, narcissism, sakit sa isip, psychosis at pagkabaliw. Ang rightism ay may ilang mga sangay at mukha, tulad ng kapitalismo, neoliberalismo, liberalismo, indibidwalismo, pasismo, right-wing nasyonalismo, Nazism, libertarianism, anarcho-kapitalismo, Randian objectivism, neopositivism, positivism, scientism, antitheism, kratosism, deicidism, theosalpeciesism transhumanism, microchipism, anti-communism, anti-socialism, anti-leftism, at iba pa. Ang rightism ay isa sa mga pinakamasamang kasamaan na sumasakit sa sangkatauhan at sa mundong ating ginagalawan. At ang rightism ay nasa lahat ng dako… Sa Internet, social media, mass media, popular na kultura, “agham”, teknolohiya, pulitika, ekonomiya… Lahat ng rightists ay psychopaths, narcissists , mentally ill, psychotic at insane. Dapat nating labanan ang rightism at lumikha ng isang mundo na ganap na kaliwa at ginawa para sa kaliwa. Kailangan nating likhain ang World Socialist Republic. Kung paanong dapat nating patayin ang lahat ng mga rightist na umiiral sa mundo, dahil marami silang sinasabi na “ang tanging mabuting komunista ay isang patay na komunista” o kahit na “nakatuon sa lahat ng mga komunista, kaya’t sinasagot natin sila na nagsasabing “ang tanging mabuting komunista ay isang dead right” at “focus all rightists”, gawin nating patunayan nila kung ano ang gusto nilang gawin sa atin, at tuparin natin ang ating pangarap na makakaliwa, sosyalista at komunista. Ang Socialist World Republic ay ating tungkulin at layunin bilang makakaliwa, sosyalista at mga komunista.

        Guilherme Monteiro Junior

        Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:52
        Orang sayap kanan adalah psikopat. Rightisme adalah kejahatan yang melanda manusia. Rightisme adalah sinonim dengan psikopati, narsisisme, penyakit mental, psikosis dan gila. Rightisme mempunyai beberapa cabang dan wajah, seperti kapitalisme, neoliberalisme, liberalisme, individualisme, fasisme, nasionalisme sayap kanan, Nazisme, libertarianisme, anarko-kapitalisme, objektivisme Randian, neopositivisme, positivisme, saintifik, antiteisme, kratosisisme, deicidisme, theospeciesisme transhumanisme, mikrocipisme, anti-komunisme, anti-sosialisme, anti-kiri, antara lain. Rightisme adalah salah satu kejahatan terburuk yang melanda manusia dan dunia di mana kita hidup. Dan fahaman kanan ada di mana-mana… Di Internet, media sosial, media massa, budaya popular, “sains”, teknologi, politik, ekonomi… Semua golongan kanan adalah psikopat, narsis, sakit mental, psikotik dan gila. Kita mesti melawan fahaman kanan dan mencipta dunia yang ditinggalkan sepenuhnya dan dibuat untuk kiri. Kita perlu mewujudkan Republik Sosialis Dunia. Sama seperti kita harus menghukum mati semua golongan kanan yang wujud di dunia, kerana mereka bercakap begitu banyak bahawa “satu-satunya komunis yang baik ialah komunis yang mati” atau bahkan “memberi tumpuan kepada semua komunis, jadi kami menjawab mereka dengan mengatakan “satu-satunya ahli kanan yang baik ialah seorang mati betul” dan “tumpu semua orang kanan”, mari kita buat mereka membuktikan apa yang mereka mahu lakukan dengan kita, dan mari kita jadikan impian kiri, sosialis dan komunis kita menjadi kenyataan. Republik Dunia Sosialis adalah tugas dan matlamat kita sebagai kiri, sosialis dan komunis.

        Guilherme Monteiro Junior

        Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:52
        ಬಲಪಂಥೀಯರು ಮನೋರೋಗಿಗಳು. ಬಲಪಂಥವು ಮಾನವೀಯತೆಯನ್ನು ಪೀಡಿಸುವ ಒಂದು ಅನಿಷ್ಟವಾಗಿದೆ. ಬಲಪಂಥವು ಮನೋರೋಗ, ನಾರ್ಸಿಸಿಸಮ್, ಮಾನಸಿಕ ಅಸ್ವಸ್ಥತೆ, ಮನೋವಿಕಾರ ಮತ್ತು ಹುಚ್ಚುತನಕ್ಕೆ ಸಮಾನಾರ್ಥಕವಾಗಿದೆ. ಬಲಪಂಥೀಯತೆಯು ಬಂಡವಾಳಶಾಹಿ, ನವ ಉದಾರವಾದ, ಉದಾರವಾದ, ವ್ಯಕ್ತಿವಾದ, ಫ್ಯಾಸಿಸಂ, ಬಲಪಂಥೀಯ ರಾಷ್ಟ್ರೀಯತೆ, ನಾಜಿಸಂ, ಸ್ವಾತಂತ್ರ್ಯವಾದ, ಅರಾಜಕ-ಬಂಡವಾಳಶಾಹಿ, ರಾಂಡಿಯನ್ ವಸ್ತುನಿಷ್ಠತೆ, ನಿಯೋಪಾಸಿಟಿವಿಸಂ, ಸಕಾರಾತ್ಮಕವಾದ, ವೈಜ್ಞಾನಿಕತೆ, ಆಂಟಿಥಿಸಂ, ಕ್ರಾಟೋಸಿಸಂ, ಥಿಯೋಸಿಸಿಸಂ, ಥಿಯೋಸಿಸಿಸಂ ಮುಂತಾದ ಹಲವಾರು ಶಾಖೆಗಳು ಮತ್ತು ಮುಖಗಳನ್ನು ಹೊಂದಿದೆ. ಟ್ರಾನ್ಸ್‌ಹ್ಯೂಮನಿಸಂ, ಮೈಕ್ರೋಚಿಪಿಸಂ, ಕಮ್ಯುನಿಸಂ ವಿರೋಧಿ, ಸಮಾಜವಾದ ವಿರೋಧಿ, ಎಡಪಂಥೀಯ ವಿರೋಧಿ, ಇತರವುಗಳಲ್ಲಿ. ಬಲಪಂಥೀಯತೆಯು ಮಾನವೀಯತೆ ಮತ್ತು ನಾವು ವಾಸಿಸುವ ಜಗತ್ತನ್ನು ಪೀಡಿಸುವ ಕೆಟ್ಟ ದುಷ್ಟರಲ್ಲಿ ಒಂದಾಗಿದೆ. ಮತ್ತು ಬಲಪಂಥೀಯತೆಯು ಎಲ್ಲೆಡೆ ಇದೆ… ಇಂಟರ್ನೆಟ್, ಸಾಮಾಜಿಕ ಮಾಧ್ಯಮ, ಸಮೂಹ ಮಾಧ್ಯಮ, ಜನಪ್ರಿಯ ಸಂಸ್ಕೃತಿ, “ವಿಜ್ಞಾನ”, ತಂತ್ರಜ್ಞಾನ, ರಾಜಕೀಯ, ಅರ್ಥಶಾಸ್ತ್ರ… ಎಲ್ಲಾ ಬಲಪಂಥೀಯರು ಮನೋರೋಗಿಗಳು, ನಾರ್ಸಿಸಿಸ್ಟ್‌ಗಳು, ಮಾನಸಿಕ ಅಸ್ವಸ್ಥರು, ಮನೋವಿಕೃತ ಮತ್ತು ಹುಚ್ಚರು. ನಾವು ಬಲಪಂಥೀಯತೆಯ ವಿರುದ್ಧ ಹೋರಾಡಬೇಕು ಮತ್ತು ಸಂಪೂರ್ಣವಾಗಿ ಎಡ ಮತ್ತು ಎಡಕ್ಕಾಗಿ ಮಾಡಿದ ಜಗತ್ತನ್ನು ರಚಿಸಬೇಕು. ನಾವು ವಿಶ್ವ ಸಮಾಜವಾದಿ ಗಣರಾಜ್ಯವನ್ನು ರಚಿಸಬೇಕಾಗಿದೆ. ಜಗತ್ತಿನಲ್ಲಿ ಇರುವ ಎಲ್ಲಾ ಬಲಪಂಥೀಯರನ್ನು ನಾವು ಮರಣದಂಡನೆ ಮಾಡಬೇಕು, ಏಕೆಂದರೆ ಅವರು “ಒಬ್ಬ ಒಳ್ಳೆಯ ಕಮ್ಯುನಿಸ್ಟ್ ಸತ್ತ ಕಮ್ಯುನಿಸ್ಟ್” ಅಥವಾ “ಎಲ್ಲಾ ಕಮ್ಯುನಿಸ್ಟರ ಮೇಲೆ ಕೇಂದ್ರೀಕರಿಸಿ” ಎಂದು ತುಂಬಾ ಮಾತನಾಡುತ್ತಾರೆ, ಆದ್ದರಿಂದ ನಾವು ಅವರಿಗೆ ಉತ್ತರಿಸುತ್ತೇವೆ “ಒಬ್ಬ ಒಳ್ಳೆಯ ಬಲಪಂಥೀಯ ಬಲಪಂಥೀಯರನ್ನು ಕೇಂದ್ರೀಕರಿಸಿ” ಮತ್ತು “ಎಲ್ಲ ಬಲಪಂಥೀಯರನ್ನು ಕೇಂದ್ರೀಕರಿಸಿ”, ಅವರು ನಮ್ಮೊಂದಿಗೆ ಏನು ಮಾಡಲು ಬಯಸುತ್ತಾರೆ ಎಂಬುದನ್ನು ಅವರು ಸಾಬೀತುಪಡಿಸೋಣ ಮತ್ತು ನಮ್ಮ ಎಡಪಂಥೀಯ, ಸಮಾಜವಾದಿ ಮತ್ತು ಕಮ್ಯುನಿಸ್ಟ್ ಕನಸನ್ನು ನನಸಾಗಿಸೋಣ. ಸಮಾಜವಾದಿ ವಿಶ್ವ ಗಣರಾಜ್ಯವು ನಮ್ಮ ಕರ್ತವ್ಯ ಮತ್ತು ಎಡಪಂಥೀಯರು, ಸಮಾಜವಾದಿಗಳು ಮತ್ತು ನಮ್ಮ ಗುರಿಯಾಗಿದೆ ಕಮ್ಯುನಿಸ್ಟರು.

        ಗಿಲ್ಹೆರ್ಮೆ ಮೊಂಟೆರೊ ಜೂನಿಯರ್

        Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:53
        જમણેરી લોકો મનોરોગી છે. અધિકારવાદ એ દુષ્ટતા છે જે માનવતાને પીડિત કરે છે. અધિકારવાદ એ મનોરોગ, નાર્સિસિઝમ, માનસિક બીમારી, મનોવિકૃતિ અને ગાંડપણનો પર્યાય છે. રાઇટિઝમની ઘણી શાખાઓ અને ચહેરાઓ છે, જેમ કે મૂડીવાદ, નવઉદારવાદ, ઉદારવાદ, વ્યક્તિવાદ, ફાસીવાદ, જમણેરી રાષ્ટ્રવાદ, નાઝીવાદ, ઉદારતાવાદ, અરાજક-મૂડીવાદ, રેન્ડિયન ઉદ્દેશવાદ, નિયોપોઝિટિવિઝમ, પ્રત્યક્ષવાદ, વિજ્ઞાનવાદ, વિરોધીવાદ, ક્રેટોસિઝમ, ડેકીસીડિઝમ, ક્લાસિકલિઝમ ટ્રાન્સહ્યુમનિઝમ, માઇક્રોચિપિઝમ, સામ્યવાદ વિરોધી, સમાજવાદ વિરોધી, ડાબેરીવાદ વિરોધી, અન્યો વચ્ચે. અધિકારવાદ એ સૌથી ખરાબ દુષ્ટતાઓમાંની એક છે જે માનવતાને અને વિશ્વમાં આપણે જીવીએ છીએ. અને અધિકારવાદ સર્વત્ર છે… ઈન્ટરનેટ, સોશિયલ મીડિયા, માસ મીડિયા, લોકપ્રિય સંસ્કૃતિ, “વિજ્ઞાન”, ટેક્નોલોજી, રાજકારણ, અર્થશાસ્ત્ર પર… બધા અધિકારવાદીઓ મનોરોગી, નાર્સિસિસ્ટ, માનસિક રીતે બીમાર, માનસિક અને પાગલ છે. આપણે રાઈટિઝમ સામે લડવું જોઈએ અને એક એવી દુનિયા બનાવવી જોઈએ જે સંપૂર્ણપણે ડાબેરી હોય અને ડાબેરીઓ માટે બનેલી હોય. આપણે વિશ્વ સમાજવાદી પ્રજાસત્તાક બનાવવાની જરૂર છે. જેમ આપણે વિશ્વમાં અસ્તિત્વમાં છે તેવા તમામ જમણેરીઓને ફાંસી આપવી જોઈએ, કારણ કે તેઓ એટલી બધી વાતો કરે છે કે “એકમાત્ર સારા સામ્યવાદી એ મૃત સામ્યવાદી છે” અથવા તો “તમામ સામ્યવાદીઓ પર ધ્યાન કેન્દ્રિત કરો, તેથી અમે તેમને એમ કહીને જવાબ આપીએ છીએ કે “એકમાત્ર સારો રાઇટિસ્ટ એ છે. ડેડ રાઇટ” અને “બધા જમણેરીઓ પર ધ્યાન કેન્દ્રિત કરો”, ચાલો તેમને સાબિત કરીએ કે તેઓ અમારી સાથે શું કરવા માંગે છે, અને ચાલો આપણા ડાબેરી, સમાજવાદી અને સામ્યવાદી સ્વપ્નને સાકાર કરીએ. સમાજવાદી વિશ્વ પ્રજાસત્તાક એ આપણી ફરજ છે અને ડાબેરીઓ, સમાજવાદીઓ અને અમારું લક્ષ્ય છે. સામ્યવાદીઓ

        ગિલ્હેર્મ મોન્ટેરો જુનિયર

        https://frenterevolucionariadostrabalhadores.blogspot.com/2022/05/quem-e-o-pai-da-fake-news-flavia.html#comment-form

        1. Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:53
          വലതുപക്ഷക്കാർ മനോരോഗികളാണ്. മനുഷ്യരാശിയെ ബാധിക്കുന്ന ഒരു തിന്മയാണ് വലതുപക്ഷവാദം. മനോരോഗം, നാർസിസിസം, മാനസികരോഗം, സൈക്കോസിസ്, ഭ്രാന്ത് എന്നിവയുടെ പര്യായമാണ് വലതുപക്ഷവാദം. മുതലാളിത്തം, നവലിബറലിസം, ലിബറലിസം, വ്യക്തിവാദം, ഫാസിസം, വലതുപക്ഷ ദേശീയത, നാസിസം, ലിബർട്ടേറിയനിസം, അരാജകത്വ-മുതലാളിത്തം, റാൻഡിയൻ ഒബ്‌ജക്റ്റിവിസം, നിയോപോസിറ്റിവിസം, പോസിറ്റിവിസം, ശാസ്ത്രവാദം, ദൈവവിരുദ്ധത, ക്രാറ്റോസിസം, ഡീസിഡിസം, തിയോസ്‌പീസിസം എന്നിങ്ങനെ നിരവധി ശാഖകളും മുഖങ്ങളും വലതുപക്ഷത്തിനുണ്ട്. മനുഷ്യത്വവിരുദ്ധത, മൈക്രോചിപ്പിസം, കമ്മ്യൂണിസം വിരുദ്ധത, സോഷ്യലിസം വിരുദ്ധത, ഇടതുപക്ഷ വിരുദ്ധത തുടങ്ങിയവ. മനുഷ്യരാശിയെയും നാം ജീവിക്കുന്ന ലോകത്തെയും ബാധിക്കുന്ന ഏറ്റവും മോശമായ തിന്മകളിലൊന്നാണ് വലതുപക്ഷവാദം. പിന്നെ റൈറ്റ്‌സിസം എല്ലായിടത്തും ഉണ്ട്… ഇന്റർനെറ്റ്, സോഷ്യൽ മീഡിയ, മാസ് മീഡിയ, ജനകീയ സംസ്കാരം, “ശാസ്ത്രം”, സാങ്കേതികവിദ്യ, രാഷ്ട്രീയം, സാമ്പത്തിക ശാസ്ത്രം… എല്ലാ വലതുപക്ഷവാദികളും മനോരോഗികളും നാർസിസിസ്റ്റുകളും മാനസികരോഗികളും മാനസികരോഗികളും ഭ്രാന്തന്മാരുമാണ്. നമ്മൾ വലതുപക്ഷത്തിനെതിരെ പോരാടുകയും പൂർണ്ണമായും ഇടതുപക്ഷവും ഇടതുപക്ഷത്തിന് വേണ്ടി നിർമ്മിച്ചതുമായ ഒരു ലോകം സൃഷ്ടിക്കണം. നമുക്ക് വേൾഡ് സോഷ്യലിസ്റ്റ് റിപ്പബ്ലിക് സൃഷ്ടിക്കേണ്ടതുണ്ട്. ലോകത്ത് നിലനിൽക്കുന്ന എല്ലാ വലതുപക്ഷക്കാരെയും നമ്മൾ വധിക്കേണ്ടത് പോലെ, “നല്ല ഒരേയൊരു കമ്മ്യൂണിസ്റ്റ് മരിച്ച കമ്മ്യൂണിസ്റ്റാണ്” അല്ലെങ്കിൽ “എല്ലാ കമ്മ്യൂണിസ്റ്റുകാരിലും ശ്രദ്ധ കേന്ദ്രീകരിക്കുക” എന്ന് അവർ വളരെയധികം സംസാരിക്കുന്നതിനാൽ, ഞങ്ങൾ അവർക്ക് ഉത്തരം നൽകുന്നു, “ഏക നല്ല വലതുപക്ഷക്കാരൻ വലത് പക്ഷവും “എല്ലാ വലതുപക്ഷവും കേന്ദ്രീകരിക്കുക”, അവർ നമ്മോട് എന്താണ് ചെയ്യാൻ ആഗ്രഹിക്കുന്നതെന്ന് അവരെ തെളിയിക്കട്ടെ, നമുക്ക് നമ്മുടെ ഇടതുപക്ഷ, സോഷ്യലിസ്റ്റ്, കമ്മ്യൂണിസ്റ്റ് സ്വപ്നം സാക്ഷാത്കരിക്കാം. സോഷ്യലിസ്റ്റ് വേൾഡ് റിപ്പബ്ലിക് നമ്മുടെ കടമയും ഇടതുപക്ഷവും സോഷ്യലിസ്റ്റുകളും എന്ന നിലയിലും നമ്മുടെ ലക്ഷ്യവുമാണ്. കമ്മ്യൂണിസ്റ്റുകൾ.

          Guilherme Monteiro ജൂനിയർ

          Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:53
          उजव्या बाजूचे लोक मनोरुग्ण आहेत. अधिकारवाद हा एक वाईट आहे जो मानवतेला त्रास देतो. उजवावाद हा मानसोपचार, नार्सिसिझम, मानसिक आजार, मनोविकार आणि वेडेपणा यांचा समानार्थी शब्द आहे. भांडवलशाही, नवउदारवाद, उदारमतवाद, व्यक्तिवाद, फॅसिझम, उजव्या विचारसरणीचा राष्ट्रवाद, नाझीवाद, उदारमतवाद, अराजक-भांडवलवाद, रॅन्डियन वस्तुनिष्ठता, निओपोझिटिव्हिझम, पॉझिटिव्हिझम, शास्त्रज्ञवाद, विरोधवाद, क्रॅटोसिझम, डेसिडीझम, क्लासिझम, द क्लासिझम, द क्लासिझम, यासारख्या अनेक शाखा आणि चेहरे आहेत. ट्रान्सह्युमनिझम, मायक्रोचिपझम, अँटी-कम्युनिझम, अँटी-सोशॅलिझम, अँटी-लेफ्टवाद, इतर. मानवतेला आणि आपण ज्या जगात राहतो त्या जगाला त्रस्त करणारी सर्वात वाईट वाईट गोष्ट म्हणजे उजवावाद. आणि उजवावाद सर्वत्र आहे… इंटरनेटवर, सोशल मीडियावर, मास मीडियावर, लोकप्रिय संस्कृतीवर, “विज्ञान”, तंत्रज्ञान, राजकारण, अर्थशास्त्र… सर्व उजवेवादी हे मनोरुग्ण, नार्सिसिस्ट, मानसिक आजारी, मनोरुग्ण आणि वेडे आहेत. आपण उजव्यावादाविरुद्ध लढले पाहिजे आणि पूर्णपणे डावे आणि डाव्यांसाठी बनलेले जग निर्माण केले पाहिजे. आपल्याला जागतिक समाजवादी प्रजासत्ताक निर्माण करण्याची गरज आहे. ज्याप्रमाणे आपण जगात अस्तित्वात असलेल्या सर्व उजव्यांना फाशी दिली पाहिजे, कारण ते इतके बोलतात की “एकमात्र चांगला कम्युनिस्ट हा मृत कम्युनिस्ट आहे” किंवा अगदी “सर्व कम्युनिस्टांवर लक्ष केंद्रित करतो, म्हणून आम्ही त्यांना उत्तर देतो की “एकमात्र चांगला उजवावादी आहे. मृत उजवे” आणि “सर्व उजव्या विचारांवर लक्ष केंद्रित करा”, त्यांना आपल्यासोबत काय करायचे आहे हे सिद्ध करूया आणि आपले डावे, समाजवादी आणि कम्युनिस्टांचे स्वप्न साकार करूया. समाजवादी जागतिक प्रजासत्ताक हे आपले कर्तव्य आहे आणि डावे, समाजवादी आणि आपले ध्येय आहे. कम्युनिस्ट

          गिल्हेर्मे मोंटेरो ज्युनियर

          Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:54
          வலதுசாரிகள் மனநோயாளிகள். மனித குலத்தை ஆட்டிப்படைக்கும் ஒரு தீமைதான் உரிமை. மனநோய், நாசீசிசம், மனநோய், மனநோய் மற்றும் பைத்தியக்காரத்தனம் ஆகியவற்றுடன் வலதுசாரிகள் ஒத்ததாக இருக்கிறது. முதலாளித்துவம், நவதாராளவாதம், தாராளமயம், தனித்துவம், பாசிசம், வலதுசாரி தேசியவாதம், நாசிசம், சுதந்திரவாதம், அராஜக-முதலாளித்துவம், ராண்டியன் புறநிலைவாதம், நியோபாசிடிவிசம், பாசிடிவிசம், அறிவியல், எதிர்ப்பு, கிராடோசிசம், டீசிடிசம், தியோஸ்பீசியஸ் போன்ற பல கிளைகள் மற்றும் முகங்கள் வலதுசாரிகளுக்கு உண்டு. மனிதாபிமானம், மைக்ரோசிபிசம், கம்யூனிச எதிர்ப்பு, சோசலிச எதிர்ப்பு, இடதுசாரி எதிர்ப்பு போன்றவை. மனித குலத்தையும், நாம் வாழும் உலகையும் பாதிக்கும் மிக மோசமான தீமைகளில் ஒன்று வலதுசாரிவாதம். மேலும் வலதுசாரிவாதம் எல்லா இடங்களிலும் உள்ளது… இணையம், சமூக ஊடகங்கள், வெகுஜன ஊடகங்கள், பிரபலமான கலாச்சாரம், “அறிவியல்”, தொழில்நுட்பம், அரசியல், பொருளாதாரம்… அனைத்து வலதுசாரிகளும் மனநோயாளிகள், நாசீசிஸ்டுகள், மனநோயாளிகள், மனநோயாளிகள் மற்றும் பைத்தியக்காரர்கள். நாம் வலதுசாரிகளுக்கு எதிராகப் போராடி, முற்றிலும் இடது மற்றும் இடதுசாரிகளுக்காக உருவாக்கப்பட்ட உலகத்தை உருவாக்க வேண்டும். நாம் உலக சோசலிச குடியரசை உருவாக்க வேண்டும். உலகில் இருக்கும் அனைத்து வலதுசாரிகளுக்கும் நாம் மரணதண்டனை வழங்குவது போல், அவர்கள் “நல்ல கம்யூனிஸ்ட் இறந்த கம்யூனிஸ்ட்” அல்லது “எல்லா கம்யூனிஸ்டுகளின் மீதும் கவனம் செலுத்துங்கள்” என்று அவர்கள் அதிகம் பேசுவதால், அவர்களுக்கு நாங்கள் பதிலளிக்கிறோம், “ஒரே ஒரு நல்ல வலதுசாரி இறந்த வலது” மற்றும் “அனைத்து வலதுசாரிகளும் கவனம் செலுத்துங்கள்”, அவர்கள் நம்முடன் என்ன செய்ய விரும்புகிறார்கள் என்பதை அவர்களை நிரூபிக்கச் செய்வோம், நமது இடதுசாரி, சோசலிச மற்றும் கம்யூனிஸ்ட் கனவை நனவாக்குவோம். சோசலிச உலகக் குடியரசு நமது கடமை மற்றும் நமது இலக்கு இடதுசாரிகள், சோசலிஸ்டுகள் மற்றும் கம்யூனிஸ்டுகள்.

          Guilherme Monteiro ஜூனியர்

          Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:54
          రైట్‌వింగ్‌లు సైకోపాత్‌లు. రైటిజం అనేది మానవాళిని పీడిస్తున్న దుర్మార్గం. రైటిజం అనేది సైకోపతి, నార్సిసిజం, మానసిక అనారోగ్యం, సైకోసిస్ మరియు పిచ్చికి పర్యాయపదంగా ఉంటుంది. రైటిజంకు పెట్టుబడిదారీ విధానం, నయా ఉదారవాదం, ఉదారవాదం, వ్యక్తివాదం, ఫాసిజం, మితవాద జాతీయవాదం, నాజీయిజం, స్వేచ్ఛావాదం, అరాచక-పెట్టుబడిదారీవాదం, రాండియన్ ఆబ్జెక్టివిజం, నియోపాజిటివిజం, పాజిటివిజం, సైంటిజం, పాండిత్యవాదం, క్రాటోసిజం, థియోస్పీసిజం వంటి అనేక శాఖలు మరియు ముఖాలు ఉన్నాయి. ట్రాన్స్‌హ్యూమనిజం, మైక్రోచిపిజం, కమ్యూనిజం వ్యతిరేకత, సోషలిజం వ్యతిరేకత, వామపక్ష వ్యతిరేకత మొదలైనవి. మానవాళిని మరియు మనం జీవిస్తున్న ప్రపంచాన్ని పీడించే చెత్త చెడులలో రైటిజం ఒకటి. మరియు రైటిజం ప్రతిచోటా ఉంది… ఇంటర్నెట్, సోషల్ మీడియా, మాస్ మీడియా, పాపులర్ కల్చర్, “సైన్స్”, టెక్నాలజీ, పాలిటిక్స్, ఎకనామిక్స్‌లో… రైటిస్టులందరూ సైకోపాత్‌లు, నార్సిసిస్టులు, మానసిక రోగులు, సైకోటిక్ మరియు పిచ్చివాళ్ళు. మనం రైటిజానికి వ్యతిరేకంగా పోరాడాలి మరియు పూర్తిగా ఎడమ మరియు వామపక్షాల కోసం తయారు చేయబడిన ప్రపంచాన్ని సృష్టించాలి. మనం ప్రపంచ సోషలిస్ట్ రిపబ్లిక్‌ను సృష్టించాలి. ప్రపంచంలో ఉన్న రైటిస్టులందరినీ మనం ఉరితీసినట్లే, “ఒకే మంచి కమ్యూనిస్ట్ చనిపోయిన కమ్యూనిస్ట్” లేదా “కమ్యూనిస్టులందరిపై దృష్టి పెట్టండి” అని వారు చాలా మాట్లాడతారు కాబట్టి మేము వారికి సమాధానం ఇస్తాము, “ఒకే మంచి రైటిస్ట్ డెడ్ రైట్” మరియు “రైటిస్టులందరిపై దృష్టి కేంద్రీకరించండి”, వారు మనతో ఏమి చేయాలనుకుంటున్నారో వారిని రుజువు చేద్దాం మరియు మన వామపక్ష, సామ్యవాద మరియు కమ్యూనిస్ట్ కలను నిజం చేద్దాం. సోషలిస్ట్ వరల్డ్ రిపబ్లిక్ మన కర్తవ్యం మరియు మన లక్ష్యం వామపక్ష వాదులు, సోషలిస్టులు మరియు కమ్యూనిస్టులు.

          Guilherme Monteiro జూనియర్

          Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:54
          ଡାହାଣପଟମାନେ ସାଇକୋପାଥ୍ | ଡାହାଣବାଦ ଏକ ମନ୍ଦ ଯାହା ମାନବିକତାକୁ କଷ୍ଟ ଦେଇଥାଏ | ସାଇକୋପାଥି, ନରସିସିଜିମ୍, ମାନସିକ ରୋଗ, ସାଇକୋସିସ୍ ଏବଂ ପାଗଳାମି ସହିତ ଡାହାଣବାଦ ସମକକ୍ଷ | ଡାହାଣବାଦର ଅନେକ ଶାଖା ଏବଂ ଚେହେରା ଅଛି, ଯେପରିକି ପୁଞ୍ଜିବାଦ, ନବକଳେବରବାଦ, ଉଦାରବାଦୀବାଦ, ବ୍ୟକ୍ତିଗତତା, ଫାସିଜିମ୍, ଡାହାଣପଟ ଜାତୀୟତାବାଦ, ନାଜିଜିମ୍, ଉଦାରବାଦୀବାଦ, ଆଙ୍କାରୋ-ପୁଞ୍ଜିବାଦ, ରାଣ୍ଡିଆନ୍ ଅବଜେକ୍ଟିଭିଜମ୍, ନେଓପୋଜିଟିଭିଜିମ୍, ପଜିଟିଭିଜିମ୍, ବ scient ଜ୍ଞାନିକତା, ଆଣ୍ଟିଥେଜିମ୍, କ୍ରାଟୋସିଜିମ୍, ଥିଓସିପିଜିମ୍ ଅନ୍ୟମାନଙ୍କ ମଧ୍ୟରେ ଟ୍ରାନ୍ସହ୍ୟୁନିଜିମ୍, ମାଇକ୍ରୋଚିପିଜିମ୍, କମ୍ୟୁନିଜିମ୍ ବିରୋଧୀ, ସମାଜବାଦ ବିରୋଧୀ, ବାମପନ୍ଥୀବାଦ | ମାନବିକତା ଏବଂ ଆମେ ରହୁଥିବା ଦୁନିଆକୁ ରାଇଟ୍ଜିମ୍ ହେଉଛି ଏକ ଖରାପ ମନ୍ଦତା | ଏବଂ ଡାହାଣବାଦ ସବୁଠାରେ ଅଛି … ଇଣ୍ଟରନେଟରେ, ସୋସିଆଲ ମିଡିଆ, ଗଣମାଧ୍ୟମ, ଲୋକପ୍ରିୟ ସଂସ୍କୃତି, “ବିଜ୍ଞାନ”, ପ୍ରଯୁକ୍ତିବିଦ୍ୟା, ରାଜନୀତି, ଅର୍ଥନୀତି … ସମସ୍ତ ଡାହାଣବାଦୀମାନେ ସାଇକୋପାଥ୍, ନରସିସିଷ୍ଟ, ମାନସିକ ସ୍ତରରେ ଅସୁସ୍ଥ, ସାଇକୋଟିକ୍ ଏବଂ ପାଗଳ | ଆମକୁ ଡାହାଣବାଦ ବିରୁଦ୍ଧରେ ଲ fight ିବାକୁ ହେବ ଏବଂ ଏକ ଦୁନିଆ ସୃଷ୍ଟି କରିବାକୁ ପଡିବ ଯାହାକି ସମ୍ପୂର୍ଣ୍ଣ ବାମପନ୍ଥୀ ଏବଂ ବାମ ପାଇଁ ତିଆରି ହେବ | ଆମକୁ ବିଶ୍ୱ ସମାଜବାଦୀ ଗଣତନ୍ତ୍ର ସୃଷ୍ଟି କରିବା ଆବଶ୍ୟକ | ଠିକ୍ ଯେପରି ଆମେ ଦୁନିଆରେ ବିଦ୍ୟମାନ ଥିବା ସମସ୍ତ ଡାହାଣବାଦୀଙ୍କୁ ଏକଜେକ୍ୟୁଟ୍ କରିବା ଉଚିତ୍, ଯେହେତୁ ସେମାନେ ଏତେ କଥାବାର୍ତ୍ତା କରନ୍ତି ଯେ “ଏକମାତ୍ର ଭଲ କମ୍ୟୁନିଷ୍ଟ ଜଣେ ମୃତ କମ୍ୟୁନିଷ୍ଟ” କିମ୍ବା “ସମସ୍ତ କମ୍ୟୁନିଷ୍ଟଙ୍କ ଉପରେ” ଧ୍ୟାନ ଦିଅନ୍ତି, ତେଣୁ ଆମେ ସେମାନଙ୍କୁ ଉତ୍ତର ଦେଇଥାଉ ଯେ “ଏକମାତ୍ର ଭଲ ଡାହାଣବାଦୀ ହେଉଛି ମୃତ ଡାହାଣ “ଏବଂ” ସମସ୍ତ ଡାହାଣବାଦୀଙ୍କୁ ଧ୍ୟାନ ଦିଅନ୍ତୁ “, ଆସନ୍ତୁ ସେମାନଙ୍କୁ ପ୍ରମାଣ କରିବା ଯେ ସେମାନେ ଆମ ସହ କଣ କରିବାକୁ ଚାହୁଁଛନ୍ତି, ଏବଂ ଆସନ୍ତୁ ଆମର ବାମପନ୍ଥୀ, ସମାଜବାଦୀ ତଥା ସାମ୍ପ୍ରଦାୟିକ ସ୍ୱପ୍ନକୁ ସାକାର କରିବା | ବାମପନ୍ଥୀ, ସମାଜବାଦୀ ଭାବରେ ସମାଜବାଦୀ ବିଶ୍ୱ ଗଣତନ୍ତ୍ର ଆମର କର୍ତ୍ତବ୍ୟ ଏବଂ ଆମର ଲକ୍ଷ୍ୟ | କମ୍ୟୁନିଷ୍ଟମାନେ |

          ଗୁଇଲେମେ ମଣ୍ଟେଏରୋ ଜୁନିଅର୍ |

          Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:55
          دائیں بازو کے لوگ نفسیاتی مریض ہیں۔ حق پرستی ایک برائی ہے جو انسانیت کو پریشان کرتی ہے۔ حق پرستی سائیکوپیتھی، نرگسیت، ذہنی بیماری، سائیکوسس اور پاگل پن کا مترادف ہے۔ رائٹ ازم کی کئی شاخیں اور چہرے ہیں، جیسے کہ سرمایہ داری، نو لبرل ازم، لبرل ازم، انفرادیت، فاشزم، دائیں بازو کی قوم پرستی، نازی ازم، آزادی پسندی، انارکو کیپٹلزم، رینڈین آبجیکٹیزم، نوپوزیٹیوزم، مثبتیت، سائنس پرستی، دشمنی، کراتوزم، ڈیکیڈزم، کلاسیکی ازم، ٹرانس ہیومنزم، مائیکرو چِپزم، اینٹی کمیونزم، اینٹی سوشلزم، اینٹی لیفٹ ازم، دوسروں کے درمیان۔ حق پرستی بدترین برائیوں میں سے ایک ہے جو انسانیت اور اس دنیا کو جس میں ہم رہتے ہیں۔ اور حق پرستی ہر جگہ موجود ہے… انٹرنیٹ، سوشل میڈیا، ماس میڈیا، پاپولر کلچر، “سائنس”، ٹیکنالوجی، سیاست، معاشیات… تمام رائٹسٹ سائیکوپیتھ، نرگسسٹ، ذہنی طور پر بیمار، نفسیاتی اور پاگل ہیں۔ ہمیں رائٹ ازم کے خلاف لڑنا چاہیے اور ایک ایسی دنیا بنانا چاہیے جو مکمل طور پر بائیں بازو کی ہو اور بائیں بازو کے لیے بنائی جائے۔ ہمیں عالمی سوشلسٹ جمہوریہ بنانے کی ضرورت ہے۔ جس طرح ہمیں دنیا میں موجود تمام حق پرستوں کو پھانسی دینا چاہیے، چونکہ وہ اتنی بات کرتے ہیں کہ “واحد اچھا کمیونسٹ ہی مردہ کمیونسٹ ہے” یا یہاں تک کہ “تمام کمیونسٹوں پر توجہ مرکوز کریں، اسی طرح ہم ان کو یہ کہتے ہوئے جواب دیتے ہیں کہ” صرف ایک اچھا حق پرست ہی ہے۔ مردہ دائیں” اور “تمام دائیں بازو پر توجہ مرکوز کریں”، آئیے انہیں ثابت کریں کہ وہ ہمارے ساتھ کیا کرنا چاہتے ہیں، اور آئیے اپنے بائیں بازو، سوشلسٹ اور کمیونسٹ کے خواب کو پورا کریں۔ کمیونسٹ

          Guilherme Monteiro جونیئر

          Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:55
          ਸੱਜੇ-ਪੱਖੀ ਮਨੋਰੋਗ ਹਨ। ਅਧਿਕਾਰਵਾਦ ਇੱਕ ਬੁਰਾਈ ਹੈ ਜੋ ਮਨੁੱਖਤਾ ਨੂੰ ਦੁਖੀ ਕਰਦੀ ਹੈ। ਰਾਈਟਿਜ਼ਮ ਸਾਈਕੋਪੈਥੀ, ਨਰਸੀਸਿਜ਼ਮ, ਮਾਨਸਿਕ ਰੋਗ, ਮਨੋਵਿਗਿਆਨ ਅਤੇ ਪਾਗਲਪਨ ਦਾ ਸਮਾਨਾਰਥੀ ਹੈ। ਰਾਈਟਿਜ਼ਮ ਦੀਆਂ ਕਈ ਸ਼ਾਖਾਵਾਂ ਅਤੇ ਚਿਹਰੇ ਹਨ, ਜਿਵੇਂ ਕਿ ਪੂੰਜੀਵਾਦ, ਨਵਉਦਾਰਵਾਦ, ਉਦਾਰਵਾਦ, ਵਿਅਕਤੀਵਾਦ, ਫਾਸ਼ੀਵਾਦ, ਸੱਜੇ-ਪੱਖੀ ਰਾਸ਼ਟਰਵਾਦ, ਨਾਜ਼ੀਵਾਦ, ਉਦਾਰਵਾਦ, ਅਰਾਜਕਤਾ-ਪੂੰਜੀਵਾਦ, ਰੈਂਡੀਅਨ ਉਦੇਸ਼ਵਾਦ, ਨਵ-ਪੰਚਵਾਦ, ਸਾਕਾਰਵਾਦ, ਵਿਗਿਆਨਵਾਦ, ਵਿਰੋਧੀਵਾਦ, ਕ੍ਰੈਟੋਸਿਜ਼ਮ, ਡੇਕੀਸਿਜ਼ਮਵਾਦ, ਜਮਾਤੀਵਾਦ, ਟ੍ਰਾਂਸਹਿਊਮਨਵਾਦ, ਮਾਈਕ੍ਰੋਚਿਪਵਾਦ, ਕਮਿਊਨਿਜ਼ਮ-ਵਿਰੋਧੀ, ਸਮਾਜਵਾਦ-ਵਿਰੋਧੀ, ਖੱਬੇ-ਪੱਖੀ-ਵਿਰੋਧੀ, ਆਦਿ। ਰਾਈਟਿਜ਼ਮ ਸਭ ਤੋਂ ਭੈੜੀਆਂ ਬੁਰਾਈਆਂ ਵਿੱਚੋਂ ਇੱਕ ਹੈ ਜੋ ਮਨੁੱਖਤਾ ਅਤੇ ਸੰਸਾਰ ਨੂੰ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਵਿਤ ਕਰਦੀ ਹੈ ਜਿਸ ਵਿੱਚ ਅਸੀਂ ਰਹਿੰਦੇ ਹਾਂ। ਅਤੇ ਰਾਈਟਿਜ਼ਮ ਹਰ ਥਾਂ ਹੈ… ਇੰਟਰਨੈੱਟ, ਸੋਸ਼ਲ ਮੀਡੀਆ, ਮਾਸ ਮੀਡੀਆ, ਪ੍ਰਸਿੱਧ ਸੱਭਿਆਚਾਰ, “ਵਿਗਿਆਨ”, ਤਕਨਾਲੋਜੀ, ਰਾਜਨੀਤੀ, ਅਰਥ ਸ਼ਾਸਤਰ ‘ਤੇ… ਸਾਰੇ ਦੱਖਣਪੰਥੀ ਮਨੋਰੋਗ, ਨਸ਼ੀਲੇ ਪਦਾਰਥ, ਮਾਨਸਿਕ ਤੌਰ ‘ਤੇ ਬਿਮਾਰ, ਮਨੋਵਿਗਿਆਨੀ ਅਤੇ ਪਾਗਲ ਹਨ। ਸਾਨੂੰ ਸੱਜੇਵਾਦ ਦੇ ਵਿਰੁੱਧ ਲੜਨਾ ਚਾਹੀਦਾ ਹੈ ਅਤੇ ਇੱਕ ਅਜਿਹੀ ਦੁਨੀਆ ਦੀ ਸਿਰਜਣਾ ਕਰਨੀ ਚਾਹੀਦੀ ਹੈ ਜੋ ਪੂਰੀ ਤਰ੍ਹਾਂ ਖੱਬੇ ਅਤੇ ਖੱਬੇ ਲਈ ਬਣਾਈ ਗਈ ਹੈ। ਸਾਨੂੰ ਵਿਸ਼ਵ ਸਮਾਜਵਾਦੀ ਗਣਰਾਜ ਬਣਾਉਣ ਦੀ ਲੋੜ ਹੈ। ਜਿਵੇਂ ਕਿ ਸਾਨੂੰ ਦੁਨੀਆਂ ਵਿੱਚ ਮੌਜੂਦ ਸਾਰੇ ਸੱਜੇਪੰਥੀਆਂ ਨੂੰ ਫਾਂਸੀ ਦੇਣੀ ਚਾਹੀਦੀ ਹੈ, ਕਿਉਂਕਿ ਉਹ ਬਹੁਤ ਜ਼ਿਆਦਾ ਗੱਲ ਕਰਦੇ ਹਨ ਕਿ “ਇਕੱਲਾ ਚੰਗਾ ਕਮਿਊਨਿਸਟ ਇੱਕ ਮਰਿਆ ਹੋਇਆ ਕਮਿਊਨਿਸਟ ਹੈ” ਜਾਂ ਇੱਥੋਂ ਤੱਕ ਕਿ “ਸਾਰੇ ਕਮਿਊਨਿਸਟਾਂ ‘ਤੇ ਧਿਆਨ ਕੇਂਦਰਤ ਕਰਦਾ ਹੈ, ਇਸ ਲਈ ਅਸੀਂ ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਇਹ ਕਹਿ ਕੇ ਜਵਾਬ ਦਿੰਦੇ ਹਾਂ ਕਿ “ਇੱਕੋ ਚੰਗਾ ਸੱਜੇਪੱਖੀ ਹੈ। ਮਰੇ ਹੋਏ ਸੱਜੇ” ਅਤੇ “ਸਾਰੇ ਸੱਜੇਪੰਥੀਆਂ ‘ਤੇ ਧਿਆਨ ਕੇਂਦਰਿਤ ਕਰੋ”, ਆਓ ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਸਾਬਤ ਕਰੀਏ ਕਿ ਉਹ ਸਾਡੇ ਨਾਲ ਕੀ ਕਰਨਾ ਚਾਹੁੰਦੇ ਹਨ, ਅਤੇ ਆਓ ਆਪਣੇ ਖੱਬੇਪੱਖੀ, ਸਮਾਜਵਾਦੀ ਅਤੇ ਕਮਿਊਨਿਸਟ ਦੇ ਸੁਪਨੇ ਨੂੰ ਸਾਕਾਰ ਕਰੀਏ। ਕਮਿਊਨਿਸਟ

          Guilherme Monteiro ਜੂਨੀਅਰ

          Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:55
          ປີກຂວາແມ່ນ psychopaths. ສິດນິຍົມແມ່ນຄວາມຊົ່ວຮ້າຍທີ່ plagues ມະນຸດ. Rightism ແມ່ນຄໍາສັບຄ້າຍຄືກັນກັບ psychopathy, narcissism, ພະຍາດທາງຈິດ, psychosis ແລະ insanity. ລັດທິນິຍົມສິດມີສາຂາ ແລະ ໜ້າທີ່ຫຼາຍຮູບຫຼາຍແບບ, ເຊັ່ນ: ລັດທິທຶນນິຍົມ, ລັດທິເສລີນິຍົມ, ລັດທິເສລີນິຍົມ, ລັດທິອິດສະລະ, ບຸກຄົນ, ລັດທິຟາດຊິດ, ລັດທິນິຍົມຝ່າຍຂວາ, ລັດທິນິຍົມຂວາ, ລັດທິນາຊີ, ລັດທິເສລີນິຍົມ, ລັດທິນິຍົມນິຍົມ, ລັດທິນິຍົມນິຍົມ, ລັດທິນິຍົມນິຍົມ, ລັດທິນິຍົມນິຍົມ, ລັດທິນິຍົມນິຍົມ, ລັດທິນິຍົມນິຍົມ, ລັດທິນິຍົມນິຍົມ, ລັດທິນິຍົມນິຍົມ, ລັດທິນິຍົມນິຍົມ, ລັດທິນິຍົມນິຍົມ, ລັດທິນິຍົມຂວາ, ລັດທິຊາດນິຍົມຂວາ, ລັດທິຊາດນິຍົມຂວາ, ລັດທິອິດສະລະ, ລັດທິເສລີນິຍົມ, ລັດທິນິຍົມນິຍົມ, ລັດທິນິຍົມນິຍົມ, ລັດທິນິຍົມນິຍົມ, ລັດທິນິຍົມນິຍົມ, ລັດທິນິຍົມນິຍົມ, ລັດທິນິຍົມນິຍົມ, ລັດທິນິຍົມນິຍົມ, ລັດທິນິຍົມນິຍົມ. transhumanism, microchipism, ຕ້ານຄອມມິວນິດ, ຕ້ານສັງຄົມນິຍົມ, ຕ້ານຊ້າຍ, ແລະອື່ນໆ. ສິດນິຍົມແມ່ນໜຶ່ງໃນຄວາມຊົ່ວຮ້າຍທີ່ຮ້າຍກາດທີ່ຮ້າຍກາດມະນຸດ ແລະໂລກທີ່ພວກເຮົາອາໄສຢູ່. ແລະລັດທິສິດມີຢູ່ທົ່ວທຸກແຫ່ງ… ໃນອິນເຕີເນັດ, ສື່ສັງຄົມ, ສື່ມວນຊົນ, ວັດທະນະທຳນິຍົມ, “ວິທະຍາສາດ”, ເທັກໂນໂລຍີ, ການເມືອງ, ເສດຖະສາດ… ພວກສິດທັງໝົດລ້ວນແຕ່ແມ່ນນັກຈິດຕະວິທະຍາ, ຊະຊາຍ, ເຈັບປ່ວຍທາງຈິດ, ຈິດຕະວິທະຍາ ແລະບ້າ. ພວກ​ເຮົາ​ຕ້ອງ​ຕໍ່​ສູ້​ຕ້ານ​ກັບ​ລັດ​ທິ​ສິດ​ທິ​ແລະ​ການ​ສ້າງ​ໂລກ​ທີ່​ເປັນ​ປະ​ໄວ້​ຢ່າງ​ສົມ​ບູນ​ແລະ​ສ້າງ​ສໍາ​ລັບ​ຊ້າຍ. ພວກເຮົາຈໍາເປັນຕ້ອງສ້າງສາທາລະນະລັດສັງຄົມນິຍົມໂລກ. ຄືກັນກັບພວກເຮົາຄວນປະຫານພວກຝ່າຍຂວາທັງໝົດທີ່ມີຢູ່ໃນໂລກ, ເພາະວ່າພວກເຂົາເວົ້າຫຼາຍວ່າ “ຄອມມິວນິສທີ່ດີຄົນດຽວຄືຄອມມິວນິດທີ່ຕາຍແລ້ວ” ຫຼືແມ່ນແຕ່ “ເນັ້ນໃສ່ພວກຄອມມິວນິສທັງໝົດ, ດັ່ງນັ້ນພວກເຮົາຈຶ່ງຕອບພວກເຂົາວ່າ “ນັກຂວາດີຄົນດຽວຄື Dead right” ແລະ “focus all rightists”, ຂໍໃຫ້ພວກເຂົາພິສູດສິ່ງທີ່ພວກເຂົາຢາກເຮັດກັບພວກເຮົາ, ແລະຂໍໃຫ້ຄວາມຝັນຂອງຊ້າຍ, ສັງຄົມນິຍົມແລະຄອມມິວນິດຂອງພວກເຮົາກາຍເປັນຄວາມຈິງ. ຄອມມິວນິດ.

          Guilherme Monteiro Junior

          Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:56
          ស្លាបស្តាំគឺជាមនុស្សវិកលចរិក។ សិទ្ធិនិយមគឺជាអំពើអាក្រក់ដែលញាំញីមនុស្សជាតិ។ សិទ្ធិនិយមគឺមានន័យដូចទៅនឹង psychopathy, narcissism, ជំងឺផ្លូវចិត្ត, psychosis និង insanity ។ លទ្ធិសិទ្ធិនិយមមានសាខា និងមុខជាច្រើនដូចជា មូលធននិយម លទ្ធិនិយមនិយម សេរីនិយម បុគ្គលនិយម ហ្វាស៊ីសនិយម លទ្ធិជាតិនិយមស្តាំនិយម ណាហ្សីនិយម សេរីនិយម អនាធិបតេយ្យនិយម របបនិយម Randian លទ្ធិ neopositivism លទ្ធិវិជ្ជមាន វិទ្យាសាស្រ្ត លទ្ធិប្រឆាំងសាសនា kratosism លទ្ធិ deicides បុរាណនិយម។ transhumanism, microchipism, ប្រឆាំងកុម្មុយនិស្ត, ប្រឆាំងសង្គមនិយម, ប្រឆាំងឆ្វេងនិយម, ក្នុងចំណោមអ្នកដទៃទៀត។ សិទ្ធិនិយមគឺជាអំពើអាក្រក់ដ៏អាក្រក់បំផុតមួយ ដែលញាំញីមនុស្សជាតិ និងពិភពលោកដែលយើងរស់នៅ។ ហើយលទ្ធិសិទ្ធិនិយមមាននៅគ្រប់ទីកន្លែង… នៅលើអ៊ីនធឺណិត ប្រព័ន្ធផ្សព្វផ្សាយសង្គម ប្រព័ន្ធផ្សព្វផ្សាយសាធារណៈ វប្បធម៌ពេញនិយម “វិទ្យាសាស្ត្រ” បច្ចេកវិទ្យា នយោបាយ សេដ្ឋកិច្ច… ពួកស្តាំនិយមទាំងអស់សុទ្ធតែជាអ្នកវិកលចរិក និស្ស័យស្នេហ៍ វិកលចរិត វិកលចរិត និងវិកលចរិត។ យើងត្រូវតែប្រយុទ្ធប្រឆាំងនឹងលទ្ធិស្តាំនិយម ហើយបង្កើតពិភពលោកមួយដែលនៅខាងឆ្វេងទាំងស្រុង និងបង្កើតសម្រាប់ឆ្វេង។ យើងត្រូវបង្កើតសាធារណរដ្ឋសង្គមនិយមពិភពលោក។ ដូចយើងគួរតែកាត់ទោសពួកស្តាំនិយមទាំងអស់ដែលមានក្នុងលោក ព្រោះគេនិយាយច្រើនថា “កុម្មុយនិស្តល្អតែមួយគត់គឺកុម្មុយនិស្តដែលស្លាប់” ឬសូម្បីតែ “ផ្តោតលើកុម្មុយនិស្តទាំងអស់ ដូច្នេះយើងឆ្លើយពួកគេថា “អ្នកស្តាំល្អតែមួយគត់គឺ Dead right” និង “ផ្តោតលើពួកស្តាំនិយមទាំងអស់” ចូរធ្វើឱ្យពួកគេបញ្ជាក់នូវអ្វីដែលពួកគេចង់ធ្វើជាមួយយើង ហើយសូមឱ្យសុបិន្តឆ្វេងនិយម សង្គមនិយម និងកុម្មុយនិស្តរបស់យើងក្លាយជាការពិត។ កុម្មុយនិស្ត។

          Guilherme Monteiro Junior

          Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:57
          Rastgir psîkopat in. Mafperestî xerabiyeke ku li mirovahiyê tê. Rastparêzî bi psîkopatî, narsîsîzm, nexweşiyên derûnî, psîkoz û dînbûnê re hevwate ye. Rastparêzî çend şax û rûyên xwe hene, wek kapîtalîzm, neolîberalîzm, lîberalîzm, ferdperestî, faşîzm, neteweperestiya rastgir, nazîzm, azadîxwazî, anarko-kapîtalîzm, objektîvîzma randî, neopozîtîvîzm, pozîtîvîzm, zanistparêzî, antîteîzm, kratozîzm, deîsîtîzm, klasîkî, transhumanîzm, mîkroçîpîzm, antî-komûnîzm, antî-sosyalîzm, antî-çepparêzî û yên din. Rastparêzî yek ji xirabtirîn xerabiyên ku mirovahî û cîhana ku em tê de dijîn e. Û rastparêzî li her derê ye… Li Înternetê, medyaya civakî, medyaya girseyî, çanda gelêrî, “zanist”, teknolojî, siyaset, aborî… Hemû rastgir psîkopat in, narsîsîst in, nexweşên derûnî ne, psîkotîk û dîn in. Divê em li dijî rastgiriyê têbikoşin û cîhanek bi tevahî çepgir û ji bo çepgiriyê hatî çêkirin biafirînin. Divê em Komara Sosyalîst a Cîhanê ava bikin. Çawa ku divê em hemû rastgirên ku li dinyayê hene bi îdam bikin, ji ber ku ew ewqas dipeyivin ku “komunîstê baş tenê komunîstek mirî ye” an jî “li ser hemî komunîstan bisekine, em jî bersivê didin wan û dibêjin “yekane rastgirekî baş e. rastê mirî” û “Hemû rastgiran bidin ber çavan”, bila wan îspat bike ka ew çi dixwazin bi me bikin û xewna xwe ya çepgir, sosyalîst û komunîst pêk bînin. Komara Cîhanî ya Sosyalîst erk û armanca me ya çep, sosyalîst û me ye. komunîstan.

          Guilherme Monteiro Junior

          Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:57
          ڕاستڕەوەکان دەروونپیسین. ڕاستگەری خراپەیەک کە ئازاری مرۆڤایەتی دەدات. ڕاستخوازی هاوواتای سایکۆپاتی و نەرگسیزم و نەخۆشی دەروونی و دەروونی و شێتییە. راستگەرایی چەندین لق و رووخساری هەیە، وەک سەرمایەداری، نیولیبرالیزم، لیبرالیزم، تاکگەرایی، فاشیزم، ناسیۆنالیزمی راستڕەو، نازیزم، ئازادیخوازی، ئەنارکۆ-کاپیتالیزم، ئۆبژێکتیڤیزمی راندی، نیوپۆزیتیڤیزم، پۆزەتیڤیزم، زانستیزم، دژە خودایزم، کراتۆسیزم، دیکوردیزم، تیۆسپیسیزم، کلاسیک ترانس هیومانیزم، مایکرۆچیپیزم، دژە کۆمۆنیزم، دژە سۆسیالیزم، دژە چەپگەرایی و چەندانی تر. راستخوازی یەکێکە لە خراپترین خراپەکان کە ئازاری مرۆڤایەتی و ئەو جیهانە دەدات کە تێیدا دەژین. وە ڕاستگەرایی لە هەموو شوێنێک هەیە… لە ئینتەرنێت، سۆشیال میدیا، ماس میدیا، کولتوری باو، “زانست”، تەکنەلۆژیا، سیاسەت، ئابووری… هەموو ڕاستڕەوەکان دەروونی، نەرگسی , نەخۆشی دەروونی، دەروونی و شێتن. پێویستە لە دژی راستگەرایی خەبات بکەین و جیهانێک دروست بکەین کە بە تەواوی چەپ بێت و بۆ چەپ دروست بکرێت. پێویستە کۆماری سۆسیالیستی جیهانی دروست بکەین. هەروەک چۆن پێویستە هەموو ئەو ڕاستڕەوانە لە سێدارە بدەین کە لە جیهاندا هەن، بەو پێیەی ئەوان ئەوەندە قسە دەکەن کە “تەنها کۆمۆنیستی باش کۆمۆنیستێکی مردووە” یان تەنانەت “تەرکیز لەسەر هەموو کۆمۆنیستەکان دەکەن، بە هەمان شێوە وەڵامیان دەدەینەوە و دەڵێین “تاکە ڕاستڕەوی باش ئا مردوو ڕاست” و “فۆکسکردنی هەموو ڕاستڕەوەکان”، با وایان لێ بکەین بیسەلمێنن کە دەیانەوێت چیمان لەگەڵ بکەن، وە با خەونی چەپ و سۆسیالیستی و کۆمۆنیستمان بەدی بهێنین. کۆماری جیهانی سۆسیالیستی ئەرکی ئێمەیە و ئامانجمانە وەک چەپەکان و سۆسیالیستەکان و… کۆمۆنیستەکان.

          گویلهێرم مۆنتیرۆ جونیۆر

          Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:57
          ቀኛዝማች ሳይኮፓቲዎች ናቸው። ፍትሃዊነት የሰውን ልጅ የሚጎዳ ክፉ ነው። ፍትሃዊነት ከሳይኮፓቲ, ናርሲስዝም, የአእምሮ ህመም, የስነ-አእምሮ እና እብደት ጋር ተመሳሳይ ነው. ራይትዝም እንደ ካፒታሊዝም፣ ኒዮሊበራሊዝም፣ ሊበራሊዝም፣ ግለሰባዊነት፣ ፋሺዝም፣ የቀኝ ክንፍ ብሔርተኝነት፣ ናዚዝም፣ ሊበራሪያኒዝም፣ አናርኮ-ካፒታሊዝም፣ ራንዲያዊ ተጨባጭነት፣ ኒዮፖዚቲቭዝም፣ አዎንታዊ አመለካከት፣ ሳይንቲዝም፣ ፀረ-ቲዝም፣ ክራቶዚዝም፣ ክላሲዝም፣ ክላሲዝም፣ ዘኦስፔሲዝም የመሳሰሉ በርካታ ቅርንጫፎች እና ፊቶች አሉት። transhumanism, microchipism, ፀረ-ኮምኒዝም, ፀረ-ሶሻሊዝም, ፀረ-ግራዝም, እና ሌሎችም. ፍትሃዊነት የሰውን ልጅ እና የምንኖርበትን አለም ከሚያስጨንቁ ክፋቶች አንዱ ነው። እና ቀኝነት በየቦታው አለ…በኢንተርኔት፣በማህበራዊ ሚዲያ፣በመገናኛ ብዙሀን፣በተወዳጅ ባህል፣”ሳይንስ”፣ቴክኖሎጂ፣ፖለቲካ፣ኢኮኖሚክስ…መብት ተሟጋቾች ሁሉ ሳይኮፓቲስቶች፣ ነፍጠኞች፣ የአእምሮ በሽተኛ፣ ስነልቦናዊ እና እብዶች ናቸው። ከትክክለኛነት ጋር መዋጋት እና ሙሉ ለሙሉ የተተወ እና ለግራ የተሰራ ዓለም መፍጠር አለብን. የአለም ሶሻሊስት ሪፐብሊክ መፍጠር አለብን። በአለም ላይ ያሉ ፍትሃዊ አራማጆችን ሁሉ መግደል እንዳለብን ሁሉ፡ “ጥሩው ኮሙኒስት የሞተ ኮሚኒስት ብቻ ነው” ወይም ደግሞ “በሁሉም ኮሚኒስቶች ላይ ያተኩራል” ብለው ስለሚናገሩ “ብቸኛው ጥሩ መብት አራማጅ ነው” ብለን እንመልሳቸዋለን። ሙት ቀኝ” እና “ሁሉም ቀኝ አራማጆች ትኩረት ይስጡ”፣ ከእኛ ጋር ምን ሊያደርጉ እንደሚፈልጉ እንዲያረጋግጡ እናድርጋቸው፣ እናም የግራ፣ የሶሻሊስት እና የኮሚኒስት ህልማችን እውን እናድርግ። ኮሚኒስቶች.

          Guilherme Monteiro ጁኒየር

          Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 19:57
          Regses is psigopate. Regte is ‘n euwel wat die mensdom teister. Rightisme is sinoniem met psigopatie, narcisme, geestesongesteldheid, psigose en waansin. Regte het verskeie takke en gesigte, soos kapitalisme, neoliberalisme, liberalisme, individualisme, fascisme, regse nasionalisme, Nazisme, libertarisme, anargo-kapitalisme, Randiese objektivisme, neopositivisme, positivisme, wetenskaplikheid, antiteïsme, kratosisme, decidisme, teospesieisme, klassieke transhumanisme, mikroskyfie, anti-kommunisme, anti-sosialisme, anti-linksisme, onder andere. Regte is een van die ergste euwels wat die mensdom en die wêreld waarin ons leef teister. En regs is oral… Op die internet, sosiale media, massamedia, populêre kultuur, “wetenskap”, tegnologie, politiek, ekonomie… Alle regses is psigopate, narsiste, geestesongesteld, psigoties en kranksinnig. Ons moet teen regses veg en ‘n wêreld skep wat heeltemal links en gemaak is vir links. Ons moet die Wêreld Sosialistiese Republiek skep. Net soos ons al die regses wat in die wêreld bestaan ​​moet teregstel, aangesien hulle so baie praat dat “die enigste goeie kommunis ‘n dooie kommunis is” of selfs “op alle kommuniste fokus, so antwoord ons hulle deur te sê “die enigste goeie regses is ‘n doodregs” en “fokus alle regses”, laat ons hulle laat bewys wat hulle met ons wil doen, en laat ons ons linkse, sosialistiese en kommunistiese droom bewaarheid. Die Sosialistiese Wêreldrepubliek is ons plig en ons doelwit as linkses, sosialiste en kommuniste.

          Guilherme Monteiro Junior

          Responder

          Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 22:45
          “Guilherme Monteiro Junior diz: 16/05/2022 às 04:31 O seu comentário aguarda moderação. Esta é uma pré-visualização, o seu comentário será visível depois de ter sido aprovado. Precisamos de mais pessoas como Grabovoi no mundo. E sim, precisamos lutar contra o fanatismo ateu, fanatismo científico, fanatismo “cético”, fanatismo secular, neopositivismo, antiteísmo… Tipo o que fanáticos ateus como Bibi Bailas etc falam sobre gente como Grabovoi, onde não aceitam quaisquer críticas à ciência ou oposição sem acusa-los de “falácia de autoridade” sendo que é exatamente isso que gente como Bibi Bailas e afins cometem. É a famosa “ciência cheesecake” (cheesecake science” atuando a aparecendo hoje em dia. E o termo “pseudociência” é um termo depreciativo e passivo-agressivo para deslegitimar outras áreas do conhecimento tão válidas quando a dita “ciência” mainstream. Esses fanáticos científicos, antiteístas, cientificistas, neopositivistas e cientistas cheesecakes são uma piada mesmo, principalmente os “estudos” falsos deles e os “papers” falso deles. E também a ciência é provavelmente a frente mais forte do ateísmo, neopositivismo, antiteísmo etc. O método científico moderno é altamente cético em relação à religião, espiritualidade e afins, o que leva as pessoas com questões de insegurança sobre sua inteligência a serem levadas ao ateísmo porque sentem que serão consideradas muito burras se permanecerem teístas. Por isso mesmo que devemos ser mesmo anticiência, principalmente anticiência crítica e seguir o anticientificismo crítico, que é um dever hoje em dia, a crítica à ciência é bem necessária hoje em dia. Ainda bem que temos gente como Grabovoi e como eu, Guilherme Monteiro Junior, pois somos nós que fazemos a diferença no mundo. Muito sucesso para quem apoia Grabovoi, e espero que no futuro haverá gente que me apoie igual como tem gente que apoia Grabovoi hoje em dia.”

          “”Guilherme Monteiro Junior says: 05/16/2022 at 04:31 Your comment is awaiting moderation. This is a preview, your comment will be visible after it has been approved. We need more people like Grabovoi in the world. And yes , we need to fight atheist fanaticism, scientific fanaticism, “skeptical” fanaticism, secular fanaticism, neopositivism, antitheism… Kind of what atheist fanatics like Bibi Bailas etc say about people like Grabovoi, where they don’t accept any criticism of science or opposition without accusing them. “authority fallacy” and that’s exactly what people like Bibi Bailas and the like commit. It’s the famous “cheesecake science” acting and appearing nowadays. And the term “pseudoscience” is a derogatory term and passive-aggressive to delegitimize other areas of knowledge as valid as the so-called mainstream “science.” These scientific fanatics, antitheists, scientists, neopositivists and cheesecake scientists are a real joke, mainly between their fake “studies” and their fake “papers”. And also science is probably the strongest front of atheism, neopositivism, antitheism etc. The modern scientific method is highly skeptical of religion, spirituality and the like, which leads people with questions of insecurity about their intelligence to be driven into atheism because they feel they will be considered very dumb if they remain theists. That’s why we must be really anti-science, especially critical anti-science and follow critical anti-scientism, which is a duty nowadays, the critique of science is very necessary nowadays. Good thing we have people like Grabovoi and like me, Guilherme Monteiro Junior, because we are the ones who make a difference in the world. Much success to those who support Grabovoi, and I hope that in the future there will be people who support me just as there are people who support Grabovoi today.””

          Responder

          Anônimo15 de maio de 2022 22:45
          “Google e Wikipedia, como sempre, fortalecendo o fanatismo ateu, fanatismo científico, comprovacionismo científico, evidencialismo científico, neopositivismo, antiteísmo… Daqui a pouco teremos o Google, a Wikipedia e afins falando de “não há evidência científica para deus, deuses, religião, espiritualidade, multiverso, metafísica, extrafísica…” Você são tudo ateu, antiteísta e neopositivista, e cada hora, dia, semana, mês e ano isso fica ainda mais claro… Google and Wikipedia, as always, strengthening atheist fanaticism, scientific fanaticism, scientific proof, scientific evidentialism, neopositivism, antitheism… Soon we will have Google, Wikipedia and the like talking about “there is no scientific evidence for god, gods, religion, spirituality, multiverse, metaphysics, extraphysics…” You are all atheist, antitheist and neopositivist, and every hour, day, week, month and year it becomes even clearer… Google y Wikipedia, como siempre, fortaleciendo el fanatismo ateo, el fanatismo científico, la prueba científica, el evidencialismo científico, el neopositivismo, el antiteísmo… Pronto tendremos a Google, Wikipedia y similares hablando de “no hay evidencia científica para dios, dioses, religión”. , espiritualidad, multiverso, metafísica, extrafísica…” Todos sois ateos, antiteístas y neopositivistas, y cada hora, día, semana, mes y año se hace aún más claro… Google et Wikipédia, comme toujours, renforcent le fanatisme athée, le fanatisme scientifique, la preuve scientifique, l’évidentialisme scientifique, le néopositivisme, l’antithéisme… Bientôt, Google, Wikipédia et autres parleront de “il n’y a aucune preuve scientifique pour Dieu, les dieux, la religion”. , spiritualité, multivers, métaphysique, extraphysique…” Vous êtes tous athées, antithéistes et néopositivistes, et chaque heure, jour, semaine, mois et année cela devient encore plus clair…”

          Responder

          https://frenterevolucionariadostrabalhadores.blogspot.com/2022/05/quem-e-o-pai-da-fake-news-flavia.html#comment-form

  6. Anônimo16 de maio de 2022 09:48
    Realmente gostei do artigo e do poema. Mas ainda sim não podemos esquecer que direitismo, capitalismo, neoliberalismo, liberalismo, libertarianismo de direita, anarcocapitalismo, objetivismo randiano, antiteísmo, neoconservadorismo, macarthismo, pinochetismo, suhartoísmo, bolsonarismo, fascismo, nazismo, nazifascismo, neopositivismo, cientificismo, debunkismo, fanatismo ateu, fanatismo científico, fanatismo “cético”, evidencialismo científico, individualismo, kratosismo, deicidismo, ragnarokismo, awtokismo, kraterocracia, anticomunismo, antissocialismo e antiesquerdismo são psicopatia, narcisismo e doenças mentais. E a Internet, as mídias sociais, o Google, a Wikipedia, a mídia de massa e a Academia mostram bem isso. Só mesmo com a República Socialista Mundial (FRT-PCTB Internacional) para acabar com estes psicopatas, narcisistas e doentes mentais que são essa galera que apoia direitismo, capitalismo, neoliberalismo etc.

    Really enjoyed the article and the poem. But still we cannot forget that rightism, capitalism, neoliberalism, liberalism, right libertarianism, anarchocapitalism, Randian objectivism, antitheism, neoconservatism, McCarthyism, pinochetism, suhartoism, bolsonarismo, fascism, nazism, nazifascism, neopositivism, scientism, debunkism, atheist fanaticism , scientific fanaticism, “skeptical” fanaticism, scientific evidentialism, individualism, kratosism, deicidism, ragnarokism, Awtokism, kraterocracy, anti-communism, anti-socialism and anti-leftism are psychopathy, narcissism and mental illness. And the Internet, social media, Google, Wikipedia, mass media and the Academy all show this well. Only with the World Socialist Republic (FRT-PCTB International) to end these psychopaths, narcissists and the mentally ill who are these people who support rightism, capitalism, neoliberalism, etc.

    Realmente disfruté el artículo y el poema. Pero aún no podemos olvidar que el derechismo, el capitalismo, el neoliberalismo, el liberalismo, el libertarismo de derecha, el anarcocapitalismo, el objetivismo randiano, el antiteísmo, el neoconservadurismo, el macartismo, el pinochetismo, el suhartoísmo, el bolsonarismo, el fascismo, el nazismo, el nazifascismo, el neopositivismo, el cientificismo, el desmitificación, el fanatismo ateo, el fanatismo científico el fanatismo, el fanatismo “escéptico”, el evidencialismo científico, el individualismo, el kratosismo, el deicidismo, el ragnarokismo, el awtokismo, la kraterocracia, el anticomunismo, el antisocialismo y el antiizquierdismo son psicopatía, narcisismo y enfermedad mental. E Internet, las redes sociales, Google, Wikipedia, los medios de comunicación y la Academia lo demuestran bien. Solo con la República Socialista Mundial (FRT-PCTB Internacional) para acabar con estos psicópatas, narcisistas y enfermos mentales que son estas personas que apoyan el derechismo, el capitalismo, el neoliberalismo, etc.

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    Responder
    Respostas

    Anônimo16 de maio de 2022 09:49
    J’ai beaucoup aimé l’article et le poème. Mais nous ne pouvons toujours pas oublier que le droitisme, le capitalisme, le néolibéralisme, le libéralisme, le libertarisme de droite, l’anarchocapitalisme, l’objectivisme randien, l’antithéisme, le néoconservatisme, le maccarthysme, le pinochétisme, le suhartoïsme, le bolsonarisme, le fascisme, le nazisme, le nazifascisme, le néopositivisme, le scientisme, le démystification, le fanatisme athée, le fanatisme scientifique le fanatisme, le fanatisme “sceptique”, l’évidentialisme scientifique, l’individualisme, le kratosisme, le déicidisme, le ragnarokisme, l’awtokisme, la kratérocratie, l’anticommunisme, l’antisocialisme et l’antigauchisme sont la psychopathie, le narcissisme et la maladie mentale. Et Internet, les médias sociaux, Google, Wikipédia, les médias de masse et l’Académie le montrent bien. Seulement avec la République Socialiste Mondiale (FRT-PCTB International) pour en finir avec ces psychopathes, narcissiques et malades mentaux que sont ces gens qui soutiennent le droitisme, le capitalisme, le néolibéralisme, etc.

    Ich habe den Artikel und das Gedicht wirklich genossen. Aber wir können immer noch nicht vergessen, dass Rechtschaffenheit, Kapitalismus, Neoliberalismus, Liberalismus, rechter Libertarismus, Anarchokapitalismus, Randianischer Objektivismus, Antitheismus, Neokonservatismus, McCarthyismus, Pinochetismus, Suhartoismus, Bolsonarismus, Faschismus, Nazismus, Nazifaschismus, Neopositivismus, Szientismus, Debunkismus, atheistischer Fanatismus, wissenschaftlich sind Fanatismus, “skeptischer” Fanatismus, wissenschaftlicher Evidenzismus, Individualismus, Kratosismus, Deizidismus, Ragnarokismus, Awtokismus, Kraterokratie, Antikommunismus, Antisozialismus und Antilinkismus sind Psychopathie, Narzissmus und Geisteskrankheit. Und das Internet, soziale Medien, Google, Wikipedia, Massenmedien und die Akademie zeigen dies alle gut. Nur mit der Sozialistischen Weltrepublik (FRT-PCTB International), um diese Psychopathen, Narzissten und Geisteskranken zu beenden, die diese Menschen sind, die Rechtsextremismus, Kapitalismus, Neoliberalismus usw. unterstützen.

    Echt genoten van het artikel en het gedicht. Maar toch mogen we niet vergeten dat rechtsisme, kapitalisme, neoliberalisme, liberalisme, rechts libertarisme, anarchokapitalisme, Randiaans objectivisme, antitheïsme, neoconservatisme, McCarthyisme, pinochetisme, soehartoïsme, bolsonarismo, fascisme, nazisme, fascisme, neopositivisme, sciëntisme, een wetenschappelijk fanatisme, debunkisme fanatisme, “sceptisch” fanatisme, wetenschappelijk evidentialisme, individualisme, kratosisme, deïcidisme, ragnarokisme, Awtokisme, kraterocratie, anticommunisme, antisocialisme en anti-linksisme zijn psychopathie, narcisme en geestesziekten. En internet, sociale media, Google, Wikipedia, massamedia en de Academie laten dit allemaal goed zien. Alleen met de World Socialist Republic (FRT-PCTB International) om een ​​einde te maken aan deze psychopaten, narcisten en geesteszieken die deze mensen zijn die rechts steunen, kapitalisme, neoliberalisme, enz.

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    Anônimo16 de maio de 2022 09:50
    Ho davvero apprezzato l’articolo e la poesia. Ma ancora non possiamo dimenticare che destra, capitalismo, neoliberismo, liberalismo, libertarismo di destra, anarcocapitalismo, oggettivismo randian, antiteismo, neoconservatorismo, maccartismo, pinochetismo, suhartoismo, bolsonarismo, fascismo, nazifascismo, neopositivismo, scientismo, debunkismo, fanatismo ateo, scientifico fanatismo, fanatismo “scettico”, evidenza scientifica, individualismo, kratosismo, deicidismo, ragnarokismo, awtokismo, craterocrazia, anticomunismo, antisocialismo e anti-sinistra sono psicopatia, narcisismo e malattia mentale. E Internet, i social media, Google, Wikipedia, i mass media e l’Academy lo dimostrano bene. Solo con la Repubblica Socialista Mondiale (FRT-PCTB International) per porre fine a questi psicopatici, narcisisti e malati di mente che sono queste persone che sostengono la destra, il capitalismo, il neoliberismo, ecc.

    Añetehápe chegusta pe artículo ha pe ñe’ẽpoty. Ha katu ko’áĝa peve ndaikatúi ñanderesarái pe derecho, capitalismo, neoliberalismo, liberalismo, libertarianismo derecho, anarcocapitalismo, objetivismo randiano, antiteísmo, neoconservatismo, McCarthyismo, pinoquetismo, suhartoismo, bolsonarismo, fascismo, nazismo, nazifascismo, neopositivismo, científico, debunkismo, fanatismo ateo , científico fanatismo, fanatismo “escéptico”, evidencialismo científico, individualismo, kratosismo, deicidismo, ragnarokismo, Awtokismo, kraterocracia, anticomunismo, antisocialismo ha antiizquierdista ha’e psicopatía, narcisismo ha mba’asy mental. Ha internet, medios sociales, Google, Wikipedia, medios masivos ha Academia opavave ohechauka porã ko mba’e. República Socialista Mundial (FRT-PCTB Internacional) ndive añoite omohu’ã haguã ko’ã psicópata, narcisista ha umi hasýva mental ha’éva ko’ã tapicha oipytyvõva derechoismo, capitalismo, neoliberalismo, etc.

    Chiqamanta gustawarqa chay qillqasqawan harawiwan ima. Ichaqa chaywanpas manan qonqasunmanchu derecha, capitalismo, neoliberalismo, liberalismo, derecho libertarianismo, anarcocapitalismo, objetivismo randiano, antiteísmo, neoconservatismo, McCarthyismo, pinoquetismo, suhartoismo, bolsonarismo, fascismo, nazismo, nazifascismo, neopositivismo, científico, debunkismo, fanatismo ateo , científico nisqakunata fanatismo , “iskeptiko” fanatismo , evidencialismo científico , individualismo , kratosismo , deicidismo , ragnarokismo , Awtokismo , kraterocracia , anti-comunismo , anti-socialismo y anti-izquierdista nisqakunaqa psikopatía , narcisismo , yuyay unquymi. Hinallataq internet, medios sociales, Google, Wikipedia, medios masivos hinallataq Academia llapanku allinta chayta rikuchinku. República Socialista Mundial (FRT-PCTB Internacional) nisqawanlla kay psicópatas, narcisistas hinallataq yuyay unquqkunata tukuchinapaq pikunachus kay runakuna derecha, capitalismo, neoliberalismo, hukkunatapas yanapaq.

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    Anônimo16 de maio de 2022 09:51
    Chiqpachansa uka qillqatampi ukat poemampix wali kusisitaw jikxatasiyäta. Ukampis wali ch’amampiw jan armañjamäkiti, derecho, capitalismo, neoliberalismo, liberalismo, libertarianismo derecho, anarcocapitalismo, objetivismo randiano, antiteísmo, neoconservatismo, McCarthyismo, pinoquetismo, suhartoismo, bolsonarismo, fascismo, nazismo, nazifascismo, neopositivismo, científico, debunkismo, fanatismo ateo , científico fanatismo, fanatismo “escéptico”, evidencialismo científico, individualismo, kratosismo, deicidismo, ragnarokismo, awtokismo, kraterocracia, anticomunismo, antisocialismo ukat antiizquierdista ukanakax psicopatía, narcisismo ukat p’iqi usu ukanakawa. Ukat Internet, medios sociales, Google, Wikipedia, medios masivos ukat Academia ukanakax taqiniw uk sum uñacht’ayapxi. República Socialista Mundial (FRT-PCTB Internacional) ukampikiw uka psicópatas, narcisistas ukat p’iqin usutanakar tukjañatakix khitinakati aka jaqinakax derechoismo, capitalismo, neoliberalismo, juk’ampinakar yanapt’apxi.

    Очень понравилась статья и стихотворение. Но все же мы не можем забыть, что правизм, капитализм, неолиберализм, либерализм, правое либертарианство, анархо-капитализм, рандовский объективизм, антитеизм, неоконсерватизм, маккартизм, пиночетизм, сухартоизм, болсонаризм, фашизм, нацизм, нацифашизм, неопозитивизм, сциентизм, дебункизм, атеистический фанатизм, научный фанатизм, «скептический» фанатизм, научный эвиденциализм, индивидуализм, кратосизм, деицидизм, рагнарокизм, автокизм, кратерократия, антикоммунизм, антисоциализм и антилевизм — это психопатия, нарциссизм и психическое заболевание. И Интернет, социальные сети, Google, Википедия, СМИ и Академия — все это хорошо показывает. Только с Мировой Социалистической Республикой (FRT-PCTB International), чтобы покончить с этими психопатами, нарциссами и психически больными людьми, которые поддерживают правые, капитализм, неолиберализм и т. д.

    真的很喜欢这篇文章和这首诗。 但我们仍然不能忘记右翼主义、资本主义、新自由主义、自由主义、右翼自由主义、无政府资本主义、兰迪客观主义、反神主义、新保守主义、麦卡锡主义、皮诺切特主义、苏哈托主义、波索纳主义、法西斯主义、纳粹主义、纳粹法西斯主义、新实证主义、科学主义、揭穿主义、无神论狂热、科学狂热主义,“怀疑”狂热主义,科学证据主义,个人主义,kratosism,deicidism,ragnarokism,Awtokism,kraterocracy,反共产主义,反社会主义和反左派是精神病,自恋和精神疾病。 互联网、社交媒体、谷歌、维基百科、大众媒体和学院都很好地展示了这一点。 只有世界社会主义共和国(FRT-PCTB International)才能结束这些支持右翼、资本主义、新自由主义等的精神病患者、自恋者和精神病患者。

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    Anônimo16 de maio de 2022 09:52
    記事と詩を本当に楽しんだ。 しかし、それでも私たちは、正義、資本主義、新自由主義、自由主義、右自由主義、無政府資本主義、ランディアン客観主義、反共主義、新保守主義、マッカーシー主義、ピノケティズム、スハルト主義、ボルソナリスモ、ファシズム、ナジズム、ナジファシズム、ネオポジティビズム、科学狂信、「懐疑的」狂信、科学的証拠主義、個人主義、クラトシズム、脱皮主義、ラグナロキズム、アトキズム、クラテロクラシー、反共主義、反社会主義、反左主義は、精神障害、ナルシシズム、精神病です。 そして、インターネット、ソーシャルメディア、グーグル、ウィキペディア、マスメディア、アカデミーはすべてこれをよく示しています。 これらの精神病質者、ナルシシスト、そして正義、資本主義、新自由主義などを支持するこれらの人々である精神病者を終わらせるために世界社会主義共和国(FRT-PCTBインターナショナル)とのみ。

    लेख और कविता बहुत अच्छी लगी। लेकिन फिर भी हम उस अधिकारवाद, पूंजीवाद, नवउदारवाद, उदारवाद, दक्षिणपंथी उदारवाद, अराजकतावाद, रैंडियन वस्तुवाद, विरोधीवाद, नवसंवादवाद, मैककार्थीवाद, पिनोशेवाद, सुहार्तवाद, बोल्सोनारिसमो, फासीवाद, नाज़ीवाद, नाज़ीफ़ासीवाद, नव-उदारवाद, वैज्ञानिकवाद, नास्तिकतावाद, वैज्ञानिकवाद, वैज्ञानिकवाद को नहीं भूल सकते। कट्टरता, “संदेहवादी” कट्टरतावाद, वैज्ञानिक प्रमाणवाद, व्यक्तिवाद, क्रेटोसिज्म, डीसिडिज्म, रैग्नारोकिज्म, औटोकिज्म, क्रेटरोक्रेसी, साम्यवाद-विरोधी, समाज-विरोधी और वाम-विरोधी मनोरोगी, संकीर्णतावाद और मानसिक बीमारी हैं। और इंटरनेट, सोशल मीडिया, गूगल, विकिपीडिया, मास मीडिया और अकादमी सभी इसे बखूबी दिखाते हैं। केवल विश्व समाजवादी गणराज्य (FRT-PCTB इंटरनेशनल) के साथ इन मनोरोगी, संकीर्णतावादियों और मानसिक रूप से बीमार लोगों को समाप्त करने के लिए जो ये लोग हैं जो दक्षिणपंथ, पूंजीवाद, नवउदारवाद आदि का समर्थन करते हैं।

    استمتعت حقا بالمقال والقصيدة. ولكن ما زلنا لا نستطيع أن ننسى أن اليمين ، والرأسمالية ، والليبرالية الجديدة ، والليبرالية ، والليبرالية اليمينية ، والرأسمالية اللاسلطوية ، والموضوعية الراندية ، ومناهضة الإله ، والمحافظين الجدد ، والمكارثية ، والبينوشيه ، والسوهارتوية ، والفاشية ، والنازية ، والنازية ، والفلسفية الجديدة ، والعلمية ، والفلسفية التعصب ، التعصب “المتشكك” ، الإثباتات العلمية ، الفردية ، القرطوية ، اللاذعة ، الراغناروكيه ، الأوتوكيه ، الكراتروقراطية ، مناهضة الشيوعية ، معاداة الاشتراكية ومعاداة اليسار هي السيكوباتية ، النرجسية والأمراض العقلية. والإنترنت ووسائل التواصل الاجتماعي وجوجل وويكيبيديا ووسائل الإعلام والأكاديمية كلها تظهر ذلك بشكل جيد. فقط مع الجمهورية الاشتراكية العالمية (FRT-PCTB International) لإنهاء هؤلاء السيكوباتيين والنرجسيين والمختلين عقليًا الذين يدعمون اليمين والرأسمالية والنيوليبرالية ، إلخ.

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    Anônimo16 de maio de 2022 09:52
    Sangat menikmati artikel dan puisinya. Tapi tetap saja kita tidak bisa melupakan bahwa kanan, kapitalisme, neoliberalisme, liberalisme, libertarianisme kanan, anarkokapitalisme, objektivisme Randian, antiteisme, neokonservatisme, McCarthyisme, pinochetisme, suhartoisme, bolsonarismo, fasisme, nazisme, nazifasisme, neopositivisme, fanatisme ilmiah, fanatisme ilmiah, fanatisme ilmiah fanatisme, fanatisme “skeptis”, pembuktian ilmiah, individualisme, kratosisme, deicidisme, ragnarokisme, Awtokisme, kraterokrasi, anti-komunisme, anti-sosialisme dan anti-kiri adalah psikopati, narsisme, dan penyakit jiwa. Dan Internet, media sosial, Google, Wikipedia, media massa, dan Akademi semuanya menunjukkan hal ini dengan baik. Hanya dengan Republik Sosialis Dunia (FRT-PCTB International) untuk mengakhiri psikopat, narsisis, dan orang sakit jiwa ini, siapa orang-orang yang mendukung kanan, kapitalisme, neoliberalisme, dll.

    Naprawdę podobał mi się artykuł i wiersz. Nie możemy jednak zapominać, że prawicowiec, kapitalizm, neoliberalizm, liberalizm, prawicowy libertarianizm, anarchokapitalizm, obiektywizm randowski, antyteizm, neokonserwatyzm, maccartyzm, pinochetizm, suhartoizm, bolsonaryzm, faszyzm, nazizm, nazifaszyzm, neopozytywizm, fanatyzm naukowy, fanatyzm naukowy, fanatyzm, fanatyzm „sceptyczny”, dowodowność naukowa, indywidualizm, kratosism, deicydyzm, ragnarokizm, awtokizm, kraterokracja, antykomunizm, antysocjalizm i antylewicowość to psychopatia, narcyzm i choroba psychiczna. Internet, media społecznościowe, Google, Wikipedia, środki masowego przekazu i Akademia dobrze to pokazują. Tylko ze Światową Republiką Socjalistyczną (FRT-PCTB International), aby zakończyć tych psychopatów, narcyzów i chorych psychicznie, którzy są tymi ludźmi, którzy popierają prawicę, kapitalizm, neoliberalizm itp.

    נהניתי מאוד מהמאמר ומהשיר. אבל עדיין לא נוכל לשכוח שימניות, קפיטליזם, ניאו-ליברליזם, ליברליזם, ליברטריאניזם ימני, אנרכו-קפיטליזם, אובייקטיביזם רנדיאני, אנטי-תאיזם, ניאו-שמרנות, מקארתיזם, פינוצ’טיזם, סוהרטואיזם, בולסונריזם, פשיזם, נאציזם, נאציפאשיזם, ניאו-פוזיטיביזם, פנסיפיזם, פאניזם, קנאות, קנאות “ספקנית”, ראיות מדעית, אינדיבידואליזם, קראטוזיזם, דה-התאבדות, רגנרוקיזם, אווטוקיזם, קראטרוקרטיה, אנטי-קומוניזם, אנטי-סוציאליזם ואנטי-שמאלנות הם פסיכופתיה, נרקיסיזם ומחלות נפש. והאינטרנט, המדיה החברתית, גוגל, ויקיפדיה, תקשורת ההמונים והאקדמיה כולם מראים זאת היטב. רק עם הרפובליקה הסוציאליסטית העולמית (FRT-PCTB אינטרנשיונל) לשים קץ לפסיכופתים, נרקיסיסטים וחולי נפש שהם האנשים האלה שתומכים בימניות, קפיטליזם, ניאו-ליברליזם וכו’.

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    Anônimo16 de maio de 2022 09:53
    Thực sự rất thích bài báo và bài thơ. Nhưng chúng ta vẫn không thể quên rằng chủ nghĩa cực hữu, chủ nghĩa tư bản, chủ nghĩa tân tự do, chủ nghĩa tự do, chủ nghĩa tự do cực hữu, chủ nghĩa vô chính phủ, chủ nghĩa khách quan ngẫu nhiên, chủ nghĩa phản thần, chủ nghĩa tân cổ điển, chủ nghĩa McCarthy, chủ nghĩa pinocheism, chủ nghĩa suharto, bolsonarismo, chủ nghĩa phát xít, chủ nghĩa naz, chủ nghĩa nazifascism, chủ nghĩa tân khoa học, chủ nghĩa cuồng tín chủ nghĩa cuồng tín, chủ nghĩa cuồng tín “hoài nghi”, chủ nghĩa hiển nhiên khoa học, chủ nghĩa cá nhân, chủ nghĩa kratosism, chủ nghĩa deicidism, chủ nghĩa ragnarokism, Awtokism, kraterocracy, chống cộng sản, chống chủ nghĩa xã hội và chống chủ nghĩa cánh tả là bệnh thái nhân cách, lòng tự ái và bệnh tâm thần. Và Internet, mạng xã hội, Google, Wikipedia, các phương tiện thông tin đại chúng và Học viện đều thể hiện tốt điều này. Chỉ với Cộng hòa Xã hội Chủ nghĩa Thế giới (FRT-PCTB International) để chấm dứt những kẻ thái nhân cách, những kẻ tự ái và những người bệnh tâm thần, những người ủng hộ chủ nghĩa hữu khuynh, chủ nghĩa tư bản, chủ nghĩa tân tự do, v.v.

    ມ່ວນຫຼາຍບົດຄວາມແລະບົດກະວີ. ແຕ່ພວກເຮົາຍັງບໍ່ສາມາດລືມວ່າ rightism, capitalism, neoliberalism, liberalism, right libertarianism, anarchocapitalism, Randian objectivism, antitheism, neoconservatism, McCarthyism, pinochetism, suhartoism, bolsonarismo, fascism, nazism, nazifascivism, scientificism, fantatico fanaticism, “ບໍ່ຄ່ອຍເຊື່ອງ່າຍໆ”, fanaticism, ຫຼັກຖານທາງວິທະຍາສາດ, ບຸກຄົນ, kratosism, deicidism, ragnarokism, Awtokism, kraterocracy, ຕ້ານຄອມມິວນິດ, ຕ້ານສັງຄົມນິຍົມແລະການຕໍ່ຕ້ານຊ້າຍແມ່ນ psychopathy, narcissism ແລະພະຍາດທາງຈິດ. ແລະອິນເຕີເນັດ, ສື່ສັງຄົມ, ກູໂກ, ວິກິພີເດຍ, ສື່ມວນຊົນແລະສະຖາບັນທັງຫມົດສະແດງໃຫ້ເຫັນດີ. ພຽງແຕ່ກັບສາທາລະນະລັດສັງຄົມນິຍົມໂລກ (FRT-PCTB International) ທີ່ຈະຢຸດຕິ psychopaths, narcissists ເຫຼົ່ານີ້ແລະພະຍາດທາງຈິດຜູ້ທີ່ເປັນປະຊາຊົນເຫຼົ່ານີ້ທີ່ສະຫນັບສະຫນູນລັດທິ, ທຶນນິຍົມ, neoliberalism, ແລະອື່ນໆ.

    ពិតជារីករាយនឹងអត្ថបទ និងកំណាព្យ។ ប៉ុន្តែយើងនៅតែមិនអាចបំភ្លេចបានថា លទ្ធិសិទ្ធិនិយម មូលធននិយម លទ្ធិនិយមនិយម សេរីនិយម សេរីនិយមស្តាំនិយម ភាពអនាធិបតេយ្យនិយម Randian objectivism ការប្រឆាំងនឹងសាសនានិយម neoconservatism McCarthyism pinochetism suhartoism bolsonarismo ហ្វាស៊ីសនិយម nazism nazifascivism លទ្ធិនិយមនិយម វិទ្យាសាស្រ្តនិយម ភាពជ្រុលនិយម ការនិយមជ្រុល “សង្ស័យ” ភស្ដុតាងវិទ្យាសាស្ត្រ ភាពជាបុគ្គលនិយម kratosism deicidism ragnarokism Awtokism kraterocracy ប្រឆាំងកុម្មុយនិស្ត ប្រឆាំងសង្គមនិយម និងលទ្ធិប្រឆាំងឆ្វេងនិយម គឺជាជំងឺវិកលចរិក ការញុះញង់ និងជំងឺផ្លូវចិត្ត។ ហើយអ៊ិនធឺណិត ប្រព័ន្ធផ្សព្វផ្សាយសង្គម Google វិគីភីឌា ប្រព័ន្ធផ្សព្វផ្សាយធំៗ និងបណ្ឌិត្យសភា សុទ្ធតែបង្ហាញរឿងនេះបានយ៉ាងល្អ។ មានតែជាមួយសាធារណរដ្ឋសង្គមនិយមពិភពលោក (FRT-PCTB International) ដើម្បីបញ្ចប់ជំងឺវិកលចរិក និស្ស័យ និងជំងឺផ្លូវចិត្តទាំងនេះ ដែលជាមនុស្សទាំងនេះដែលគាំទ្រលទ្ធិសិទ្ធិនិយម មូលធននិយម លទ្ធិនិយមនិយម។ល។

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    Anônimo16 de maio de 2022 09:53

    Anônimo16 de maio de 2022 09:54
    ชอบบทความและบทกวีจริงๆ แต่เรายังคงไม่ลืมว่าลัทธิฝ่ายขวา, ทุนนิยม, เสรีนิยมใหม่, เสรีนิยม, เสรีนิยมทางขวา, อนาธิปไตย, ลัทธิวัตถุนิยม Randian, ตรงกันข้าม, ลัทธิอนุรักษ์นิยมใหม่, McCarthyism, pinochetism, suhartoism, bolsonarismo, ฟาสซิสต์, นาซี, นาซีฟาสซิสต์, ลัทธินิยมนิยม, ลัทธินิยมนิยม ความคลั่งไคล้, ความคลั่งไคล้ “สงสัย”, หลักฐานทางวิทยาศาสตร์, ปัจเจกนิยม, kratosism, deicidism, ragnarokism, Awtokism, kraterocracy, ต่อต้านคอมมิวนิสต์, ต่อต้านสังคมนิยมและต่อต้านฝ่ายซ้ายเป็นโรคจิตเภท, การหลงตัวเองและความเจ็บป่วยทางจิต และอินเทอร์เน็ต โซเชียลมีเดีย Google วิกิพีเดีย สื่อมวลชน และ Academy ต่างก็แสดงให้เห็นเป็นอย่างดี เฉพาะกับสาธารณรัฐสังคมนิยมโลก (FRT-PCTB International) เท่านั้นที่จะยุติพวกโรคจิต พวกหลงตัวเอง และคนป่วยทางจิต ซึ่งก็คือคนเหล่านี้ที่สนับสนุนลัทธิสิทธินิยม ทุนนิยม เสรีนิยมใหม่ ฯลฯ

    ဆောင်းပါးနဲ့ ကဗျာကို အရမ်းသဘောကျတယ်။ သို့သော် ကျွန်ုပ်တို့သည် လက်ယာဝါဒ၊ အရင်းရှင်စနစ်၊ လစ်ဘရယ်ဝါဒ၊ လစ်ဘရယ်ဝါဒ၊ မှန်ကန်သော လစ်ဘရယ်ဝါဒ၊ မင်းမဲ့ကာပစ်ဝါဒ၊ Randian objectivism၊ ဆန့်ကျင်ဘက်ဝါဒ၊ neoconservatism၊ McCarthyism၊ pinochetism၊ suhartoism၊ တယူသန်ဝါဒ၊ “သံသယ” တယူသန်ဝါဒ၊ သိပ္ပံနည်းကျအထောက်အထား၊ တစ်သီးပုဂ္ဂလဝါဒ၊ kratosism၊ deicidism၊ ragnarokism၊ Awtokism၊ kraterocracy၊ ကွန်မြူနစ်ဆန့်ကျင်ရေး၊ ဆိုရှယ်လစ်ဆန့်ကျင်ရေးနှင့် လက်ဝဲဆန့်ကျင်ရေးဝါဒတို့သည် စိတ်ရောဂါ၊ စွဲလမ်းမှုနှင့် စိတ်ရောဂါများဖြစ်သည်။ ပြီးတော့ အင်တာနက်၊ ဆိုရှယ်မီဒီယာ၊ Google၊ Wikipedia၊ လူထုမီဒီယာနဲ့ အကယ်ဒမီတို့က ဒါကို ကောင်းကောင်းပြတယ်။ လက်ယာဝါဒ၊ အရင်းရှင်စနစ်၊ neoliberalism စသည်တို့ကို ပံ့ပိုးပေးသော ဤစိတ်ရောဂါများ၊ အစွန်းရောက်သမားများနှင့် စိတ်မနှံ့သူများကို အဆုံးသတ်ရန် ကမ္ဘာ့ဆိုရှယ်လစ်သမ္မတနိုင်ငံ (FRT-PCTB International) ဖြင့်သာ ဆောင်ရွက်ပါ။

    সত্যিই নিবন্ধ এবং কবিতা উপভোগ. কিন্তু তবুও আমরা ভুলতে পারি না যে ডানবাদ, পুঁজিবাদ, নিওলিবারেলিজম, লিবারেলিজম, ডান স্বাধীনতাবাদ, নৈরাজ্যবাদ, নৈরাজ্যবাদ, রেন্ডিয়ান বস্তুবাদ, বিদ্বেষবাদ, নব্য রক্ষণশীলতা, ম্যাককার্থিজম, পিনোচেটিজম, সুহার্তোবাদ, বলসোনারিজম, ফ্যাসিবাদ, নাৎসিবাদ, নাজিফ্যাসিজম, নব্যবিজ্ঞানবাদ, নব্যতাবাদ, নব্যতাবাদ ধর্মান্ধতা, “সন্দেহবাদী” ধর্মান্ধতা, বৈজ্ঞানিক প্রমাণবাদ, ব্যক্তিবাদ, ক্র্যাটোসিজম, ডেইসিডিজম, রাগনারোকিজম, অটোকিজম, ক্রেটারোক্রেসি, কমিউনিজম বিরোধী, সমাজতন্ত্র বিরোধী এবং বামপন্থী মনোপ্যাথি, নার্সিসিজম এবং মানসিক অসুস্থতা। এবং ইন্টারনেট, সোশ্যাল মিডিয়া, গুগল, উইকিপিডিয়া, গণমাধ্যম এবং একাডেমি সবই এটি ভালভাবে দেখায়। শুধুমাত্র বিশ্ব সমাজতান্ত্রিক প্রজাতন্ত্রের (এফআরটি-পিসিটিবি ইন্টারন্যাশনাল) সাথে এইসব সাইকোপ্যাথ, নার্সিসিস্ট এবং মানসিকভাবে অসুস্থ যারা ডানপন্থা, পুঁজিবাদ, নব্য উদারনীতি ইত্যাদি সমর্থন করে তাদের শেষ করতে।

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    Anônimo16 de maio de 2022 09:55
    Gillade verkligen artikeln och dikten. Men vi kan ändå inte glömma att högerism, kapitalism, nyliberalism, liberalism, högerlibertarianism, anarkokapitalism, randiansk objektivism, antiteism, neokonservatism, McCarthyism, pinochetism, suhartoism, bolsonarismo, fascism, nazism, nazifascism, neopositivism, fanscientism, vid debunkism, fanatism, “skeptisk” fanatism, vetenskaplig evidensism, individualism, kratosism, deicidism, ragnarokism, awtokism, kraterokrati, antikommunism, antisocialism och antivänsterism är psykopati, narcissism och psykisk ohälsa. Och Internet, sociala medier, Google, Wikipedia, massmedia och Akademin visar alla detta väl. Bara med World Socialist Republic (FRT-PCTB International) för att få slut på dessa psykopater, narcissister och psykiskt sjuka som är dessa människor som stödjer högerism, kapitalism, nyliberalism, etc.

    Nautin todella artikkelista ja runosta. Mutta silti emme voi unohtaa, että oikeisto, kapitalismi, uusliberalismi, liberalismi, oikeistoliberalismi, anarkokapitalismi, randilainen objektivismi, antiteismi, uuskonservatismi, McCarthyismi, pinoketismi, suhartoismi, bolsonarismi, fasismi, natsismi, natsifasismi, tieteellinen natsismi, natsifasismi, uusbunkismi, anatsismi fanaattisuus, “skeptinen” fanatismi, tieteellinen evidencialismi, individualismi, kratosismi, deicidismi, ragnarokismi, awtokismi, kraterokratia, antikommunismi, antisosialismi ja antivasemmisto ovat psykopatiaa, narsismia ja mielisairautta. Ja Internet, sosiaalinen media, Google, Wikipedia, joukkomedia ja Akatemia osoittavat tämän hyvin. Vain Maailman sosialistisen tasavallan (FRT-PCTB International) kanssa lopettamaan nämä psykopaatit, narsistit ja mielisairaat, jotka ovat näitä ihmisiä, jotka tukevat oikeistoa, kapitalismia, uusliberalismia jne.

    Дуже сподобалася стаття та вірш. Але все ж ми не можемо забувати, що правий, капіталізм, неолібералізм, лібералізм, правий лібертаріанство, анаркокапіталізм, рендіанський об’єктивізм, антитеїзм, неоконсерватизм, маккартизм, пінохетизм, сухартоїзм, болсонаризм, фашизм, нацизм, нацифашизм, неопозитивізм, фанатизм і науковий фанатизм. фанатизм, «скептичний» фанатизм, науковий евіденціалізм, індивідуалізм, кратосизм, деїцидизм, рагнарокізм, автокізм, кратерократія, антикомунізм, антисоціалізм і антилівість — це психопатія, нарцисизм і психічні захворювання. І Інтернет, соціальні мережі, Google, Вікіпедія, ЗМІ та Академія – все це добре показують. Тільки зі Світовою Соціалістичною Республікою (FRT-PCTB International), щоб покінчити з цими психопатами, нарцисами та психічно хворими, які є цими людьми, які підтримують правий рух, капіталізм, неолібералізм тощо.

    Guilherme Monteiro Junior

    Responder

    https://frenterevolucionariadostrabalhadores.blogspot.com/2022/05/por-que-e-por-quem-eu-luto-cosme-lopes.html?showComment=1652705327275#c930966880840391861

  7. Anônimo16 de maio de 2022 11:49
    Fascismo Motoboy realmente existe, assim como fascismo do tribunal do crime, fascismo criminal, fascismo da cultura do cancelamento, fascismo da cultura do desmascaramento, fascismo judicial, fascismo policial-prisional, fascismo antipedófilo, fascismo anticomunista, fascismo antissocialista, fascismo antiesquerdista, fascismo capitalista, fascismo neoliberal, fascismo antirracista, fascismo alt-right, fascismo libertário, fascismo anarcocapitalista, fascismo de livre mercado, fascismo ateu, fascismo tecnológico, fascismo digital, fascismo de Internet, fascismo científico, fascismo “cético”, fascismo antiteísta, fascismo evidencialista, fascismo neopositivista etc.

    Motoboy fascism really exists, just like crime court fascism, criminal fascism, cancel culture fascism, unmask culture fascism, judicial fascism, police-prison fascism, anti-pedophile fascism, anti-communist fascism, anti-socialist fascism, anti-left fascism, capitalist fascism , neoliberal fascism, anti-racist fascism, alt-right fascism, libertarian fascism, anarcho-capitalist fascism, free market fascism, atheist fascism, technological fascism, digital fascism, Internet fascism, scientific fascism, “skeptical” fascism, antitheistic fascism, evidentialist fascism, neopositivist fascism etc.

    El fascismo motoboy existe realmente, al igual que el fascismo de la corte criminal, el fascismo criminal, cancelar el fascismo cultural, desenmascarar el fascismo cultural, el fascismo judicial, el fascismo policial-prisión, el fascismo antipedófilo, el fascismo anticomunista, el fascismo antisocialista, el fascismo antiizquierdista, fascismo capitalista, fascismo neoliberal, fascismo antirracista, fascismo de extrema derecha, fascismo libertario, fascismo anarcocapitalista, fascismo de libre mercado, fascismo ateo, fascismo tecnológico, fascismo digital, fascismo de Internet, fascismo científico, fascismo “escéptico”, fascismo antiteísta , fascismo evidencialista, fascismo neopositivista, etc.

    Le fascisme Motoboy existe vraiment, tout comme le fascisme des tribunaux criminels, le fascisme criminel, le fascisme culturel annulé, le fascisme culturel démasqué, le fascisme judiciaire, le fascisme policier-prisonnier, le fascisme anti-pédophile, le fascisme anti-communiste, le fascisme anti-socialiste, le fascisme anti-gauche, fascisme capitaliste, fascisme néolibéral, fascisme antiraciste, fascisme de droite alternative, fascisme libertaire, fascisme anarcho-capitaliste, fascisme du marché libre, fascisme athée, fascisme technologique, fascisme numérique, fascisme Internet, fascisme scientifique, fascisme “sceptique”, fascisme antithéiste , fascisme évidentialiste, fascisme néopositiviste etc.

    Responder
    Respostas

    Anônimo16 de maio de 2022 11:52
    Motoboy-Faschismus gibt es wirklich, genauso wie Kriminalfaschismus, Kriminalfaschismus, Kulturfaschismus aufheben, Kulturfaschismus demaskieren, Justizfaschismus, Polizeigefängnisfaschismus, Antipädophilenfaschismus, Antikommunistischer Faschismus, Antisozialistischer Faschismus, Antilinksfaschismus, kapitalistischer Faschismus, neoliberaler Faschismus, antirassistischer Faschismus, Alt-Right-Faschismus, libertärer Faschismus, anarcho-kapitalistischer Faschismus, Faschismus des freien Marktes, atheistischer Faschismus, technologischer Faschismus, digitaler Faschismus, Internet-Faschismus, wissenschaftlicher Faschismus, “skeptischer” Faschismus, antitheistischer Faschismus , Evidenzfaschismus, neopositivistischer Faschismus etc.

    Motoboy-fascisme bestaat echt, net als misdaadrechtbankfascisme, crimineel fascisme, cultuurfascisme opheffen, cultuurfascisme ontmaskeren, gerechtelijk fascisme, politiegevangenisfascisme, antipedofiel fascisme, anticommunistisch fascisme, antisocialistisch fascisme, anti-links fascisme, kapitalistisch fascisme, neoliberaal fascisme, antiracistisch fascisme, alt-rechts fascisme, libertair fascisme, anarcho-kapitalistisch fascisme, vrijemarktfascisme, atheïstisch fascisme, technologisch fascisme, digitaal fascisme, internetfascisme, wetenschappelijk fascisme, wetenschappelijk fascisme, “skeptisch fascisme , evidentialistisch fascisme, neopositivistisch fascisme enz.

    Il fascismo motoboy esiste davvero, proprio come il fascismo della corte criminale, il fascismo criminale, il fascismo dell’annullamento della cultura, il fascismo della cultura smascherata, il fascismo giudiziario, il fascismo della polizia-carcere, il fascismo anti-pedofilo, il fascismo anticomunista, il fascismo antisocialista, il fascismo anti-sinistra, fascismo capitalista, fascismo neoliberista, fascismo antirazzista, fascismo dell’alt-right, fascismo libertario, fascismo anarco-capitalista, fascismo del libero mercato, fascismo ateo, fascismo tecnologico, fascismo digitale, fascismo di Internet, fascismo scientifico, fascismo “scettico”, fascismo antiteista , fascismo probatorista, fascismo neopositivista ecc.

    Мотобойский фашизм действительно существует, так же как криминальный судебный фашизм, криминальный фашизм, культурный фашизм отмены, культурный фашизм разоблачения, судебный фашизм, полицейско-тюремный фашизм, антипедофильский фашизм, антикоммунистический фашизм, антисоциалистический фашизм, антилевый фашизм, капиталистический фашизм, неолиберальный фашизм, антирасистский фашизм, альт-правый фашизм, либертарианский фашизм, анархо-капиталистический фашизм, фашизм свободного рынка, атеистический фашизм, технологический фашизм, цифровой фашизм, интернет-фашизм, научный фашизм, «скептический» фашизм, антитеистический фашизм , эвиденциалистский фашизм, неопозитивистский фашизм и др.

    Anônimo16 de maio de 2022 11:52
    Motoboy法西斯主义确实存在,就像犯罪法庭法西斯主义,刑事法西斯主义,取消文化法西斯主义,揭露文化法西斯主义,司法法西斯主义,警察监狱法西斯主义,反恋童癖法西斯主义,反共产法西斯主义,反社会主义法西斯主义,反左法西斯主义,资本主义法西斯主义,新自由主义法西斯主义,反种族主义法西斯主义,另类右翼法西斯主义,自由主义法西斯主义,无政府资本主义法西斯主义,自由市场法西斯主义,无神论法西斯主义,技术法西斯主义,数字法西斯主义,互联网法西斯主义,科学法西斯主义,“怀疑”法西斯主义,反神论法西斯主义,证据主义法西斯主义,新实证主义法西斯主义等。

    モトボーイファシズムは、犯罪裁判所ファシズム、刑事ファシズム、文化ファシズムのキャンセル、文化ファシズムのマスク解除、司法ファシズム、警察刑務所ファシズム、反小児性愛者ファシズム、反共産主義ファシズム、反社会主義ファシズム、反左ファシズムのように、実際に存在します。資本主義ファシズム、新自由主義ファシズム、反人種主義ファシズム、オルタナティブファシズム、リバータリアンファシズム、無政府資本主義ファシズム、自由市場ファシズム、無神論者ファシズム、技術ファシズム、デジタルファシズム、インターネットファシズム、科学ファシズム、「懐疑的」ファシズム、反神話的ファシズム、証拠主義的ファシズム、新ポジティビストファシズムなど。

    मोटोबॉय फासीवाद वास्तव में मौजूद है, जैसे अपराध अदालत फासीवाद, आपराधिक फासीवाद, संस्कृति फासीवाद को रद्द करना, संस्कृति फासीवाद को बेनकाब करना, न्यायिक फासीवाद, पुलिस-जेल फासीवाद, पीडोफाइल विरोधी फासीवाद, कम्युनिस्ट विरोधी फासीवाद, समाजवाद विरोधी फासीवाद, वाम विरोधी फासीवाद, पूंजीवादी फासीवाद, नवउदारवादी फासीवाद, नस्लवाद विरोधी फासीवाद, ऑल्ट-राइट फासीवाद, उदारवादी फासीवाद, अराजकता-पूंजीवादी फासीवाद, मुक्त बाजार फासीवाद, नास्तिक फासीवाद, तकनीकी फासीवाद, डिजिटल फासीवाद, इंटरनेट फासीवाद, वैज्ञानिक फासीवाद, “संदेहवादी” फासीवाद, विरोधी फासीवाद , साक्ष्यवादी फासीवाद, नवपोषीवादी फासीवाद आदि।

    فاشية Motoboy موجودة حقًا ، تمامًا مثل فاشية محكمة الجريمة ، والفاشية الإجرامية ، وإلغاء الفاشية الثقافية ، وكشف الفاشية الثقافية عن الفاشية ، والفاشية القضائية ، وفاشية سجن الشرطة ، والفاشية ضد الاستغلال الجنسي للأطفال ، والفاشية المناهضة للشيوعية ، والفاشية المناهضة للاشتراكية ، والفاشية المعادية لليسار ، الفاشية الرأسمالية ، الفاشية النيوليبرالية ، الفاشية المناهضة للعنصرية ، فاشية اليمين البديل ، الفاشية التحررية ، الفاشية الرأسمالية الأناركية ، فاشية السوق الحرة ، الفاشية الملحدة ، الفاشية التكنولوجية ، الفاشية الرقمية ، فاشية الإنترنت ، الفاشية العلمية ، الفاشية “المتشككة” ، الفاشية المناهضة للإلحاد ، فاشية الإثباتات ، الفاشية الوضعية الجديدة ، إلخ.

    Anônimo16 de maio de 2022 11:52
    Мотобойський фашизм дійсно існує, так само, як злочинний судовий фашизм, кримінальний фашизм, фашизм відміни культури, фашизм демаскованої культури, судовий фашизм, поліцейсько-тюремний фашизм, антипедофілський фашизм, антикомуністичний фашизм, антисоціалістичний фашизм, антилівий фашизм, капіталістичний фашизм, неоліберальний фашизм, антирасистський фашизм, альт-правий фашизм, лібертаріанський фашизм, анархо-капіталістичний фашизм, фашизм вільного ринку, атеїстичний фашизм, технологічний фашизм, цифровий фашизм, Інтернет-фашизм, науковий фашизм, “скептичний” фашизм, антитеїстський фашизм , фактичний фашизм, неопозитивістський фашизм тощо.

    Faszyzm motoboyów naprawdę istnieje, tak jak faszyzm sądów kryminalnych, faszyzm kryminalny, zniesienie faszyzmu kulturowego, zdemaskowanie faszyzmu kulturowego, faszyzm sądowy, faszyzm więzienny policji, faszyzm antypedofilski, faszyzm antykomunistyczny, faszyzm antysocjalistyczny, faszyzm antylewicowy, faszyzm kapitalistyczny , faszyzm neoliberalny, faszyzm antyrasistowski, faszyzm prawicowy, faszyzm libertariański, faszyzm anarcho-kapitalistyczny, faszyzm wolnorynkowy, faszyzm ateistyczny, faszyzm technologiczny, faszyzm cyfrowy, faszyzm internetowy, naukowy „antyfaszyzm”, „sceptycyzm” , faszyzm ewidencyjny, faszyzm neopozytywistyczny itp.

    Fasisme motoboy benar-benar ada, seperti fasisme pengadilan kejahatan, fasisme kriminal, fasisme budaya batal, fasisme budaya membuka kedok, fasisme yudisial, fasisme penjara polisi, fasisme anti-pedofilia, fasisme anti-komunis, fasisme anti-sosialis, fasisme anti-kiri, fasisme kapitalis, fasisme neoliberal, fasisme anti-rasis, fasisme alt-kanan, fasisme libertarian, fasisme anarko-kapitalis, fasisme pasar bebas, fasisme ateis, fasisme teknologi, fasisme digital, fasisme internet, fasisme ilmiah, fasisme “skeptis”, fasisme antiteistik , fasisme pembuktian, fasisme neopositivis, dll.

    Motoboy-fascismen existerar verkligen, precis som brottsdomstolsfascismen, brottsfascismen, avbryta kulturfascismen, avslöja kulturfascismen, rättsfascismen, polisfängelsefascismen, antipedofil fascism, antikommunistisk fascism, antisocialistisk fascism, antivänsterfascism, kapitalistisk fascism, nyliberal fascism, antirasistisk fascism, alt-höger fascism, libertär fascism, anarkokapitalistisk fascism, frimarknadsfascism, ateistisk fascism, teknologisk fascism, digital fascism, internetfascism, vetenskaplig fascism, “skeptisk” fascism, antiteistisk fascism, , evidensialistisk fascism, neopositivistisk fascism etc.

    Responder

    https://frenterevolucionariadostrabalhadores.blogspot.com/2022/05/por-que-e-por-quem-eu-luto-cosme-lopes.html#comment-form

  8. Anônimo16 de maio de 2022 13:22
    [16/5 10:08] Guilherme Monteiro: Design de Joias I me fez concluir que realmente precisamos de cursos de pré-graduação e pré-superior…
    [16/5 10:09] Guilherme Monteiro: E cursos de inglês e espanhol básico e avançado 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [16/5 10:10] Guilherme Monteiro: Agora eu entendo o motivo de tanta desistência na UFES, principalmente em gemologia
    [16/5 10:12] Guilherme Monteiro: Vamos ter que ter até trabalho de maior aprendiz para poder começar a trabalhar também kkkkkk…
    [16/5 10:13] Guilherme Monteiro: É tanta exigência, que parece que estamos realmente em um 1984 de formação, trabalhos e deveres 🤣🤣🤣😶😶😶
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: Bem que no Brasil poderia ter aulas de espanhol desde o fundamental I igual como tem aulas de inglês
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: Realmente, é bem necessário isso
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: Os brasileiros deviam sim saber falar português, inglês e espanhol
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: Virou quase que uma obrigação
    [16/5 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro: E alguns até mesmo incluem francês nesse meio…
    [16/5 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro: E uns poucos incluem até mesmo Guarani 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [16/5 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro: Brasileiros falando Guarani… Isso sim que é amar o Brasil pra valer mesmo 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [16/5 12:09] Guilherme Monteiro: Bem que o Guarani poderia ser um dos idiomas oficiais do Espírito Santo… Junto do Português, Italiano, Alemão e Pomerano 🤣🤣🤣😅😅😅
    [16/5 12:29] Guilherme Monteiro: Bem que o Mercosul poderia fazer algo mais útil do que só as placas de carro… Mas algo como, ensino obrigatório de Português e Espanhol nas escolas
    [16/5 12:30] Guilherme Monteiro: Países que falam espanhol com aulas obrigatórias de Português e o Brasil com aulas obrigatórias de espanhol
    [16/5 12:30] Guilherme Monteiro: Seria uma forma de integrar os países do Mercosul mais rápido
    [16/5 12:30] Guilherme Monteiro: E a UNASUR também
    [16/5 12:37] Guilherme Monteiro: Eu não vejo os partidos falando sobre isso… Só mesmo o PCTB (Partido Comunista dos Trabalhadores Brasileiros) que fala sobre isso e um oh outro partido BR

    Responder
    Respostas

    Anônimo16 de maio de 2022 13:22
    [5/16 10:08] Guilherme Monteiro: Jewelry Design I made me conclude that we really need undergraduate and higher education courses…
    [16/5 10:09] Guilherme Monteiro: And basic and advanced English and Spanish courses 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [5/16 10:10] Guilherme Monteiro: Now I understand why so many dropouts at UFES, especially in gemology
    [5/16 10:12] Guilherme Monteiro: We’re going to have to have a job as a major apprentice to be able to start working too lol…
    [16/5 10:13] Guilherme Monteiro: It’s so demanding, it seems like we’re really in a 1984 of training, work and duties 🤣🤣🤣😶😶😶
    [5/16 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: Well, in Brazil I could have Spanish classes from elementary school, just like English classes
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: Really, this is very necessary
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: Brazilians should know how to speak Portuguese, English and Spanish
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: It became almost an obligation
    [16/5 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro: And some even include French in this medium…
    [5/16 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro: And a few even include Guarani 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [16/5 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro: Brazilians speaking Guarani… That’s what it’s like to really love Brazil 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [16/5 12:09] Guilherme Monteiro: Guarani could be one of the official languages ​​of Espírito Santo… Along with Portuguese, Italian, German and Pomeranian 🤣🤣🤣😅😅😅
    [5/16 12:29] Guilherme Monteiro: Mercosur could do something more useful than just license plates… But something like, mandatory teaching of Portuguese and Spanish in schools
    [5/16 12:30] Guilherme Monteiro: Spanish speaking countries with mandatory Portuguese classes and Brazil with mandatory Spanish classes
    [16/5 12:30] Guilherme Monteiro: It would be a way to integrate the Mercosur countries faster
    [16/5 12:30] Guilherme Monteiro: And UNASUR too
    [5/16 12:37] Guilherme Monteiro: I don’t see the parties talking about it… Only the PCTB (Communist Party of Brazilian Workers) talks about it and an oh another BR party

    Anônimo16 de maio de 2022 13:23
    [5/16 10:08] Guilherme Monteiro: Diseño de Joyas Me hice concluir que realmente necesitamos cursos de pregrado y educación superior…
    [16/5 10:09] Guilherme Monteiro: Y cursos básicos y avanzados de inglés y español 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [16/5 10:10] Guilherme Monteiro: Ahora entiendo por qué tantas deserciones en la UFES, especialmente en gemología
    [5/16 10:12] Guilherme Monteiro: Vamos a tener que tener un trabajo como un aprendiz más grande para poder empezar a trabajar también lol…
    [16/5 10:13] Guilherme Monteiro: Es tan exigente, parece que realmente estamos en un 1984 de entrenamiento, trabajo y deberes 🤣🤣🤣😶😶😶
    [5/16 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: Bueno, en Brasil, podría tener clases de español desde la escuela primaria, como las clases de inglés
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: Realmente, esto es muy necesario
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: los brasileños deben saber hablar portugués, inglés y español
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: Se convirtió casi en una obligación
    [16/5 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro: Y algunos incluso incluyen el francés en este medio…
    [5/16 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro: Y algunos incluso incluyen guaraní 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [16/5 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro: Brasileños hablando guaraní… Así es amar a Brasil de verdad 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [16/5 12:09] Guilherme Monteiro: El guaraní podría ser uno de los idiomas oficiales de Espírito Santo… Junto al portugués, italiano, alemán y pomerania 🤣🤣🤣😅😅😅
    [16/5 12:29] Guilherme Monteiro: El Mercosur podría hacer algo más útil que las placas… Pero algo así como la enseñanza obligatoria del portugués y el español en las escuelas
    [5/16 12:30] Guilherme Monteiro: países de habla hispana con clases obligatorias de portugués y Brasil con clases obligatorias de español
    [16/5 12:30] Guilherme Monteiro: Sería una forma de integrar más rápido a los países del Mercosur
    [16/5 12:30] Guilherme Monteiro: Y UNASUR también
    [16/5 12:37] Guilherme Monteiro: No veo que los partidos hablen de eso… Solo el PCTB (Partido Comunista de los Trabajadores Brasileños) habla de eso y un oh otro partido BR

    Anônimo16 de maio de 2022 13:23
    [16/05 10:08] Guilherme Monteiro : Création de bijoux J’en ai conclu qu’il nous fallait vraiment des cours de premier cycle et d’enseignement supérieur…
    [16/5 10:09] Guilherme Monteiro : Et des cours d’anglais et d’espagnol de base et avancés 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [5/16 10:10] Guilherme Monteiro : Je comprends maintenant pourquoi tant d’abandons à l’UFES, notamment en gemmologie
    [16/05 10:12] Guilherme Monteiro : Il va falloir qu’on ait un boulot d’apprenti plus gros pour pouvoir commencer à bosser aussi lol…
    [16/5 10:13] Guilherme Monteiro : C’est tellement exigeant, on dirait qu’on est vraiment dans un 1984 de formation, de travail et de devoirs 🤣🤣🤣😶😶😶
    [16/05 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro : Eh bien, au Brésil, je pourrais avoir des cours d’espagnol dès l’école primaire, tout comme les cours d’anglais
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro : Vraiment, c’est très nécessaire
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro : Les Brésiliens devraient savoir parler portugais, anglais et espagnol
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro : C’est devenu presque une obligation
    [16/5 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro : Et certains incluent même le français dans ce médium…
    [5/16 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro : Et certains incluent même des Guarani 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [16/5 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro : des Brésiliens qui parlent guarani… C’est ça d’aimer vraiment le Brésil 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [16/5 12:09] Guilherme Monteiro : Le guarani pourrait être l’une des langues officielles de l’Espírito Santo… Avec le portugais, l’italien, l’allemand et le poméranien 🤣🤣🤣😅😅😅
    [16/05 12:29] Guilherme Monteiro : Le Mercosur pourrait faire quelque chose de plus utile que de simples plaques d’immatriculation… Mais quelque chose comme l’enseignement obligatoire du portugais et de l’espagnol dans les écoles
    [16/05 12:30] Guilherme Monteiro : pays hispanophones avec cours de portugais obligatoires et Brésil avec cours d’espagnol obligatoires
    [16/5 12:30] Guilherme Monteiro : Ce serait un moyen d’intégrer plus rapidement les pays du Mercosur
    [16/5 12:30] Guilherme Monteiro : Et l’UNASUR aussi
    [16/05 12:37] Guilherme Monteiro : Je ne vois pas les partis en parler… Seul le PCTB (Parti Communiste des Travailleurs Brésiliens) en parle et un oh un autre parti BR

    Anônimo16 de maio de 2022 13:24
    [5/16 10:08] Guilherme Monteiro: Schmuckdesign Ich habe mich zu dem Schluss gebracht, dass wir wirklich Grund- und Hochschulkurse brauchen …
    [16/5 10:09] Guilherme Monteiro: Und grundlegende und fortgeschrittene Englisch- und Spanischkurse 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [5/16 10:10] Guilherme Monteiro: Jetzt verstehe ich, warum so viele Abbrecher an der UFES sind, besonders in der Gemmologie
    [5/16 10:12] Guilherme Monteiro: Wir müssen einen Job als größerer Lehrling haben, um anfangen zu können, zu arbeiten, zu lol …
    [16/5 10:13] Guilherme Monteiro: Es ist so anstrengend, es scheint, als wären wir wirklich in einem 1984 von Training, Arbeit und Pflichten 🤣🤣🤣😶😶😶
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: Nun, in Brasilien könnte ich Spanischunterricht von der Grundschule haben, genau wie Englischunterricht
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: Wirklich, das ist sehr notwendig
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: Brasilianer sollten wissen, wie man Portugiesisch, Englisch und Spanisch spricht
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: Es wurde fast zu einer Pflicht
    [16/5 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro: Und einige beinhalten sogar Französisch in diesem Medium …
    [5/16 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro: Und ein paar enthalten sogar Guarani 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [16/5 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro: Brasilianer sprechen Guarani… So ist es, Brasilien wirklich zu lieben 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [16/5 12:09] Guilherme Monteiro: Guarani könnte eine der offiziellen Sprachen von Espírito Santo sein… Zusammen mit Portugiesisch, Italienisch, Deutsch und Pommern 🤣🤣🤣😅😅😅
    [5/16 12:29] Guilherme Monteiro: Mercosur könnte etwas Nützlicheres tun als nur Nummernschilder … Aber so etwas wie obligatorischen Unterricht in Portugiesisch und Spanisch in Schulen
    [5/16 12:30] Guilherme Monteiro: Spanischsprachige Länder mit obligatorischem Portugiesischunterricht und Brasilien mit obligatorischem Spanischunterricht
    [16/5 12:30] Guilherme Monteiro: Es wäre ein Weg, die Mercosur-Länder schneller zu integrieren
    [16/5 12:30] Guilherme Monteiro: Und UNASUR auch
    [5/16 12:37] Guilherme Monteiro: Ich sehe nicht, dass die Parteien darüber sprechen… Nur die PCTB (Kommunistische Partei der brasilianischen Arbeiter) spricht darüber und eine oh, andere BR-Partei

    Anônimo16 de maio de 2022 13:24
    [5/16 10:08] Guilherme Monteiro: Sieradenontwerp Ik heb me laten concluderen dat we echt undergraduate en hoger onderwijs nodig hebben…
    [16/5 10:09] Guilherme Monteiro: En basis- en geavanceerde cursussen Engels en Spaans 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [5/16 10:10] Guilherme Monteiro: Nu begrijp ik waarom zoveel drop-outs bij UFES, vooral in de edelsteenkunde
    [5/16 10:12] Guilherme Monteiro: We zullen een baan als grotere leerling moeten hebben om ook te kunnen gaan werken lol…
    [16/5 10:13] Guilherme Monteiro: Het is zo veeleisend, het lijkt alsof we echt in een 1984 van opleiding, werk en taken zitten 🤣🤣🤣😶😶😶
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: Nou, in Brazilië zou ik vanaf de basisschool Spaanse lessen kunnen krijgen, net als Engelse lessen
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: Echt, dit is echt nodig
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: Brazilianen moeten Portugees, Engels en Spaans kunnen spreken
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: Het werd bijna een verplichting
    [16/5 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro: En sommigen gebruiken zelfs Frans in dit medium…
    [5/16 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro: En een paar bevatten zelfs Guarani 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [16/5 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro: Brazilianen spreken Guarani… Zo is het om echt van Brazilië te houden 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [16/5 12:09] Guilherme Monteiro: Guarani zou een van de officiële talen van Espírito Santo kunnen zijn… Samen met Portugees, Italiaans, Duits en Pommeren 🤣🤣🤣😅😅😅
    [5/16 12:29] Guilherme Monteiro: Mercosur zou iets nuttigers kunnen doen dan alleen kentekenplaten… Maar zoiets als verplicht onderwijs in Portugees en Spaans op scholen
    [5/16 12:30] Guilherme Monteiro: Spaanssprekende landen met verplichte Portugese lessen en Brazilië met verplichte Spaanse lessen
    [16/5 12:30] Guilherme Monteiro: Het zou een manier zijn om de Mercosur-landen sneller te integreren
    [16/5 12:30] Guilherme Monteiro: En ook UNASUR
    [5/16 12:37] Guilherme Monteiro: Ik zie de partijen er niet over praten… Alleen de PCTB (Communistische Partij van Braziliaanse Arbeiders) praat erover en nog een BR-partij

    Anônimo16 de maio de 2022 13:24
    [5/16 10:08] Guilherme Monteiro: Jewelry Design Mi ha fatto concludere che abbiamo davvero bisogno di corsi universitari e di istruzione superiore…
    [16/5 10:09] Guilherme Monteiro: E corsi di inglese e spagnolo base e avanzato 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [5/16 10:10] Guilherme Monteiro: Ora capisco perché così tanti abbandoni all’UFES, soprattutto in gemmologia
    [5/16 10:12] Guilherme Monteiro: Dovremo avere un lavoro come apprendista più grande per poter iniziare a lavorare troppo lol…
    [16/5 10:13] Guilherme Monteiro: È così impegnativo, sembra che siamo davvero in un 1984 di formazione, lavoro e doveri 🤣🤣🤣😶😶😶
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: Beh, in Brasile potrei avere lezioni di spagnolo dalle elementari, proprio come le lezioni di inglese
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: Davvero, questo è molto necessario
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: i brasiliani dovrebbero sapere parlare portoghese, inglese e spagnolo
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: È diventato quasi un obbligo
    [16/5 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro: E alcuni includono persino il francese in questo mezzo…
    [5/16 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro: E alcuni includono anche Guarani 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [16/5 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro: i brasiliani parlano guarani… Ecco com’è amare davvero il Brasile 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [16/5 12:09] Guilherme Monteiro: Il guarani potrebbe essere una delle lingue ufficiali dell’Espírito Santo… Insieme a portoghese, italiano, tedesco e pomerania 🤣🤣🤣😅😅😅
    [5/16 12:29] Guilherme Monteiro: il Mercosur potrebbe fare qualcosa di più utile delle semplici targhe… Ma qualcosa come l’insegnamento obbligatorio di portoghese e spagnolo nelle scuole
    [5/16 12:30] Guilherme Monteiro: paesi di lingua spagnola con lezioni di portoghese obbligatorie e Brasile con lezioni di spagnolo obbligatorie
    [16/5 12:30] Guilherme Monteiro: Sarebbe un modo per integrare più velocemente i paesi del Mercosur
    [16/5 12:30] Guilherme Monteiro: E anche UNASUR
    [5/16 12:37] Guilherme Monteiro: Non vedo i partiti che ne parlano… Ne parla solo il PCTB (Partito Comunista dei Lavoratori Brasiliani) e un altro partito BR

    Anônimo16 de maio de 2022 13:25
    [5/16 10:08] Guilherme Monteiro: Diseño de Joyería Chemohu’ã añetehápe ñaikotevẽha umi curso de pregrado ha educación superior…
    [16/5 10:09] Guilherme Monteiro: Ha curso básico ha avanzado inglés ha español 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [5/16 10:10] Guilherme Monteiro: Ko’ágã antende mba’érepa hetaiterei ohejáva UFES-pe, especialmente gemología-pe
    [5/16 10:12] Guilherme Monteiro: Jaguerekova’erã peteĩ tembiapo peteĩ aprendiz tuichavéva ramo ikatu haguã ñañepyrũ ñamba’apo avei lol…
    [16/5 10:13] Guilherme Monteiro: Tuichaiterei mba’e ojejeruréva, ha’ete ku añetehápe ñaimeva’ekue peteĩ 1984-pe oñembokatupyry, tembiapo ha tembiaporã 🤣🤣🤣😶😶😶
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: Bueno, Brasil-pe, ikatu areko clase de español escuela primaria guive, umi clase inglés-peguáicha
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: Añetehápe, kóva tekotevẽterei
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: Brasil-ygua oikuaava’erã mba’éichapa oñe’ẽ portugués, inglés ha castellano-pe
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: Haimete oiko chugui peteĩ obligación
    [16/5 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro: Ha oĩ voi omoĩva francés ko medio-pe…
    [5/16 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro: Ha mbovymi jepe oike Guarani 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [16/5 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro: Brasileños hablando guaraní… Péicha ha’e jahayhu añete Brasil-pe 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [16/5 12:09] Guilherme Monteiro: Guarani ikatu ha’e peteĩva umi ñe’ẽ tee Espírito Santo… Portugués, italiano, alemán ha pomerania ndive 🤣🤣🤣😅😅😅
    [5/16 12:29] Guilherme Monteiro: Mercosur ikatu ojapo peteî mba’e ideprovechovéva chapa-gui añónte… Ha katu peteî mba’e ojoguáva, mbo’epy obligatorio portugués ha español mbo’ehaópe
    [5/16 12:30] Guilherme Monteiro: Tetãnguéra oñe’êva español orekóva clase obligatoria portugués ha Brasil orekóva clase obligatoria español
    [16/5 12:30] Guilherme Monteiro: Ha’éta peteĩ tape oñembojoaju pya’eve haguã tetãnguéra Mercosur-pegua
    [16/5 12:30] Guilherme Monteiro: Ha UNASUR avei
    [5/16 12:37] Guilherme Monteiro: Ndahechái umi partido oñe’êva hese… PCTB (Partido Comunista de Trabajadores Brasileños) añoite oñe’ê hese ha peteî oh ambue partido BR

    Anônimo16 de maio de 2022 13:26
    [5/16 10:08] Guilherme Monteiro: Diseño de Joyería Tukuchiwarqanim chiqaptapuni necesitanchik cursos de pregrado y superior…
    [16/5 10:09] Guilherme Monteiro: Y cursos básicos y avanzados de inglés y español 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [5/16 10:10] Guilherme Monteiro: Kunanqa entiendeni imaraykun askha saqepunku UFESpi, astawanqa gemología nisqapi
    [5/16 10:12] Guilherme Monteiro: Aswan hatun yachakuq hina llamk’anayuq kananchik tiyan, anchata llamk’ayta qallariyta atinaykupaq lol…
    [16/5 10:13] Guilherme Monteiro: Ancha exigente, parece que estamos realmente en un 1984 de capacitación, trabajo y deberes 🤣🤣🤣😶😶😶
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: Allinmi, Brasilpiqa, primariamantapacha kastilla simipi clasekunata ruwayta atiyman, inglés simipi clasekuna hina
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: Chiqamanta, kayqa ancha necesario
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: Brasilmanta runakunaqa yachanankum portugués, inglés hinaspa kastilla simi rimayta
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: Yaqa obligacionmanmi tukupurqan
    [16/5 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro: Hinaspa wakinqa francés simitapas kay mediopi churanku…
    [5/16 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro: Y unos pocos hasta incluyen guaraní 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [16/5 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro: Brasilmanta runakuna guarani simita rimachkanku… Chaynam chiqaptapuni Brasilta kuyayqa 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [16/5 12:09] Guilherme Monteiro: Guaraní podría ser una de las idiomas oficiales de Espírito Santo… Junto con portugués, italiano, alemán y pomeranio 🤣🤣🤣😅😅😅
    [5/16 12:29] Guilherme Monteiro: Mercosurqa ruwayta atinmanmi aswan allin kaqta mana placakunallamantachu… Ichaqa imapas hina, obligatorio yachachiy portugués simita español simita yachaywasikunapi
    [5/16 12:30] Guilherme Monteiro: Kastilla simi rimaq suyukuna obligatorio portugués clasekunawan hinallataq Brasil obligatorio español clasekunawan
    [16/5 12:30] Guilherme Monteiro: Huk ñan kanman Mercosur suyukunata aswan utqaylla hukllanapaq
    [16/5 12:30] Guilherme Monteiro: Hinallataq UNASURpas
    [5/16 12:37] Guilherme Monteiro: Manam rikunichu chaymanta rimasqankuta partidokuna… PCTB (Partido Comunista de Trabajadores Brasileños)lla chaymanta riman hinaspa huk oh huk partido BR

    Anônimo16 de maio de 2022 13:26
    [5/16 10:08] Guilherme Monteiro: Diseño de Joyas Nayax chiqpachapuniw pregrado ukat jach’a yatiqañ utanakan yatichäwinak munapxta sasin amuyt’ayawayta…
    [16/5 10:09] Guilherme Monteiro: Ukat inglés ukat español cursos básicos ukat avanzados 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [5/16 10:10] Guilherme Monteiro: Jichhax amuyasta kunats walja UFES ukan yatiqañ jaytapxi, juk’ampis gemología tuqina
    [5/16 10:12] Guilherme Monteiro: Jiwasax mä jach’a yatiqañ utan irnaqäwiw utjañapa, ukhamat sinti irnaqañ qalltañataki lol…
    [16/5 10:13] Guilherme Monteiro: Wali mayiwiwa, chiqpachans mä 1984 maran yatichäwinakan, irnaqañan ukhamarak lurawinakan jikxataskaspas ukhamawa 🤣🤣🤣😶😶😶
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: Walikiwa, Brasil markanx primaria ukanx español arut yatichäwinakaw utjaspa, inglés arut yatichäwinakjama
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: Chiqpachansa, akax wali wakiskiriwa
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: Brasil markankirinakax portugués, inglés ukat español arunak arsuñ yatipxañapawa
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: Niya mä obligación ukhamaw tukuwayi
    [16/5 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro: Ukat yaqhipanakax francés aruruw aka medio ukanx uñt’ayapxaraki…
    [5/16 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro: Ukat mä qawqhanix Guarani 🤣🤣🤣🤣 uksa uñt’ayapxarakiwa
    [16/5 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro: Brasil markankirinakax guaraní aru arsupxi… Ukhamaw Brasil markar chiqpachan munasiñax 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [16/5 12:09] Guilherme Monteiro: Guarani arux Espírito Santo markan oficial arunakapat maynïriw utjaspa… Portugués, italiano, alemán ukat pomeraniano ukanakamp chika 🤣🤣🤣😅😅😅
    [5/16 12:29] Guilherme Monteiro: Mercosur ukax placas ukanakat sipans juk’amp askinak luraspa… Ukampis mä juk’a, yatiqañ utanakan portugués ukat español arunak obligatorio yatichaña
    [5/16 12:30] Guilherme Monteiro: Español aru parlir markanakax portugués aru yatiqañ utanakan obligatorio ukhamarak Brasil markan español aru yatiqañ utanakan obligatorio
    [16/5 12:30] Guilherme Monteiro: Mä thakhiw Mercosur markanakar jank’ak mayacht’añataki
    [16/5 12:30] Guilherme Monteiro: Ukat UNASUR ukax ukhamarakiwa
    [5/16 12:37] Guilherme Monteiro: Janiw uñjkti partidos ukanakax uka tuqit arsusipki… PCTB (Partido Comunista de Trabajadores Brasileños) ukakiw uka tuqit arsu ukat mä oh yaqha partido BR

    Anônimo16 de maio de 2022 13:26
    [5/16 10:08] Гильерме Монтейро: Ювелирный дизайн Я сделал вывод, что нам действительно нужны курсы бакалавриата и высшего образования…
    [16/5 10:09] Гильерме Монтейро: И базовые и продвинутые курсы английского и испанского 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [5/16 10:10] Гильерме Монтейро: Теперь я понимаю, почему так много отсева в UFES, особенно в геммологии
    [5/16 10:12] Guilherme Monteiro: Нам придется устроиться на работу в качестве подмастерьев постарше, чтобы начать работать, лол…
    [16/5 10:13] Guilherme Monteiro: Это так сложно, кажется, что мы действительно находимся в 1984 году тренировок, работы и обязанностей 🤣🤣🤣😶😶😶
    [16/5 12:07] Гильерме Монтейро: Ну, в Бразилии у меня были бы уроки испанского в начальной школе, точно так же, как уроки английского
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: Действительно, это очень нужно
    [16/5 12:07] Гильерме Монтейру: Бразильцы должны знать, как говорить на португальском, английском и испанском языках
    [16/5 12:07] Гильерме Монтейро: Это стало почти обязательством
    [16/5 12:08] Гильерме Монтейро: А некоторые даже включают французский язык в эту среду…
    [5/16 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro: А некоторые даже включают гуарани 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [16/5 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro: Бразильцы говорят на гуарани… Вот что значит по-настоящему любить Бразилию 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [16/5 12:09] Гильерме Монтейру: Гуарани может быть одним из официальных языков Эспириту-Санту… Наряду с португальским, итальянским, немецким и поморским 🤣🤣🤣😅😅😅
    [5/16 12:29] Гильерме Монтейру: Меркосур мог бы сделать что-то более полезное, чем просто номерные знаки… Но что-то вроде обязательного преподавания португальского и испанского в школах
    [5/16 12:30] Гильерме Монтейро: испаноязычные страны с обязательными занятиями португальским языком и Бразилия с обязательными занятиями испанским языком
    [16/5 12:30] Гильерме Монтейро: Это поможет быстрее интегрировать страны МЕРКОСУР
    [16/5 12:30] Гильерме Монтейро: И УНАСУР тоже
    [5/16 12:37] Guilherme Monteiro: Я не вижу, чтобы партии говорили об этом… Только PCTB (Коммунистическая партия бразильских рабочих) говорит об этом и еще одна партия BR

    Anônimo16 de maio de 2022 13:27
    [5/16 10:08] Guilherme Monteiro:珠宝设计我让我得出结论,我们真的需要本科和高等教育课程……
    [16/5 10:09] Guilherme Monteiro:还有基础和高级英语和西班牙语课程🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [5/16 10:10] Guilherme Monteiro:现在我明白为什么有这么多 UFES 辍学了,尤其是在宝石学方面
    [5/16 10:12] Guilherme Monteiro:我们将不得不有一份更大的学徒工作才能开始工作,哈哈……
    [16/5 10:13] Guilherme Monteiro:要求太高了,好像我们真的是在 1984 年的训练、工作和职责🤣🤣🤣😶😶😶
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro:嗯,在巴西,我可以从小学开始上西班牙语课,就像英语课一样
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro:真的,这个很有必要
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro:巴西人应该知道如何说葡萄牙语、英语和西班牙语
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro:这几乎成了一种义务
    [16/5 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro:有些人甚至在这个媒体中加入了法语……
    [5/16 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro:还有一些甚至包括瓜拉尼🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [16/5 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro:巴西人说瓜拉尼语……这就是真正爱巴西的感觉🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [16/5 12:09] Guilherme Monteiro:瓜拉尼语可能是圣埃斯皮里图的官方语言之一……与葡萄牙语、意大利语、德语和波美拉尼亚语一起🤣🤣🤣😅😅😅
    [5/16 12:29] Guilherme Monteiro:南方共同市场可以做一些比车牌更有用的事情……但是就像在学校强制教授葡萄牙语和西班牙语
    [5/16 12:30] Guilherme Monteiro:西班牙语国家强制开设葡萄牙语课程,巴西强制开设西班牙语课程
    [16/5 12:30] Guilherme Monteiro:这将是更快整合南方共同市场国家的一种方式
    [16/5 12:30] Guilherme Monteiro:还有 UNASUR
    [5/16 12:37] Guilherme Monteiro:我没有看到各方在谈论它……只有PCTB(巴西工人共产党)谈论它,哦另一个BR党

    Anônimo16 de maio de 2022 13:27
    [5/16 10:08]ギレルメモンテイロ:ジュエリーデザイン私は、学部と高等教育のコースが本当に必要であると結論付けました…
    [16/5 10:09]ギレルメモンテイロ:そして基本的および高度な英語とスペイン語のコース🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [5/16 10:10]ギレルメ・モンテイロ:UFESで、特に宝石学で、なぜこれほど多くの中退者がいるのか理解できました。
    [5/16 10:12]ギレルメ・モンテイロ:働き始めるには、もっと大きな見習いとしての仕事が必要です笑…
    [16/5 10:13]ギレルメモンテイロ:それはとても厳しいです、私たちは本当に1984年のトレーニング、仕事、そして義務の中にいるようです🤣🤣🤣😶😶😶
    [16/5 12:07]ギレルメ・モンテイロ:ええと、ブラジルでは、英語の授業と同じように、小学校からスペイン語の授業を受けることができました。
    [16/5 12:07]ギレルメ・モンテイロ:本当に、これは非常に必要です
    [16/5 12:07]ギレルメモンテイロ:ブラジル人はポルトガル語、英語、スペイン語を話す方法を知っている必要があります
    [16/5 12:07]ギレルメ・モンテイロ:それはほとんど義務になりました
    [16/5 12:08]ギレルメ・モンテイロ:そしてこの媒体にフランス語を含む人もいます…
    [5/16 12:08]ギレルメモンテイロ:そして、いくつかはグアラニを含みます🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [16/5 12:08]ギレルメモンテイロ:グアラニー語を話すブラジル人…それは本当にブラジルを愛するようなものです🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [16/5 12:09]ギレルメモンテイロ:グアラニー語はエスピリトサントの公式言語の1つである可能性があります…ポルトガル語、イタリア語、ドイツ語、ポメラニアンとともに🤣🤣🤣😅😅😅
    [5/16 12:29]ギレルメ・モンテイロ:メルコスールは、ナンバープレートだけでなくもっと便利なことをすることができます…しかし、学校でのポルトガル語とスペイン語の義務的な教育のようなものです
    [5/16 12:30]ギレルメモンテイロ:ポルトガル語の授業が義務付けられているスペイン語圏の国とスペイン語の授業が義務付けられているブラジル
    [16/5 12:30]ギレルメ・モンテイロ:メルコスール諸国をより早く統合する方法になるでしょう
    [16/5 12:30]ギレルメ・モンテイロ:そしてUNASURも
    [5/16 12:37]ギレルメ・モンテイロ:党がそれについて話しているのを見ていません… PCTB(ブラジル労働者の共産党)だけがそれについて話していて、もう1つのBR党です

    Anônimo16 de maio de 2022 13:27
    [5/16 10:08] गुइलहर्मे मोंटेरो: ज्वेलरी डिज़ाइन मैंने मुझे यह निष्कर्ष निकाला कि हमें वास्तव में स्नातक और उच्च शिक्षा पाठ्यक्रमों की आवश्यकता है …
    [16/5 10:09] गुइलहर्मे मोंटेरो: और बुनियादी और उन्नत अंग्रेजी और स्पेनिश पाठ्यक्रम 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [5/16 10:10] गुइलहर्मे मोंटेरो: अब मुझे समझ में आया कि यूएफईएस में इतने सारे ड्रॉपआउट क्यों हैं, खासकर जेमोलॉजी में
    [5/16 10:12] गुइलहर्मे मोंटेइरो: हमें एक बड़े प्रशिक्षु के रूप में नौकरी करने जा रहे हैं ताकि हम भी काम करना शुरू कर सकें …
    [16/5 10:13] गुइलहर्मे मोंटेरो: यह बहुत मांग है, ऐसा लगता है कि हम वास्तव में प्रशिक्षण, काम और कर्तव्यों के 1984 में हैं
    [16/5 12:07] गुइलहर्मे मोंटेरो: ठीक है, ब्राजील में, मैं अंग्रेजी कक्षाओं की तरह ही प्राथमिक विद्यालय से स्पेनिश कक्षाएं ले सकता था
    [16/5 12:07] गुइलहर्मे मोंटेइरो: वास्तव में, यह बहुत आवश्यक है
    [16/5 12:07] गुइलहर्मे मोंटेरो: ब्राजीलियाई लोगों को पुर्तगाली, अंग्रेजी और स्पेनिश बोलना आना चाहिए
    [16/5 12:07] गुइलहर्मे मोंटेरो: यह लगभग एक दायित्व बन गया
    [16/5 12:08] गुइलहर्मे मोंटेरो: और कुछ में इस माध्यम में फ्रेंच भी शामिल है …
    [5/16 12:08] गुइलहर्मे मोंटेरो: और कुछ में गुआरानी . भी शामिल हैं
    [16/5 12:08] गुइलहर्मे मोंटेइरो: गुआरानी बोलने वाले ब्राज़ीलियाई… ब्राज़ील से वास्तव में प्यार करना ऐसा ही है
    [16/5 12:09] गुइलहर्मे मोंटेरो: गुआरानी एस्पिरिटो सैंटो की आधिकारिक भाषाओं में से एक हो सकती है … पुर्तगाली, इतालवी, जर्मन और पोमेरेनियन के साथ
    [5/16 12:29] गुइलहर्मे मोंटेइरो: मर्कोसुर सिर्फ लाइसेंस प्लेट की तुलना में कुछ अधिक उपयोगी कर सकता था … लेकिन कुछ ऐसा, स्कूलों में पुर्तगाली और स्पेनिश का अनिवार्य शिक्षण
    [5/16 12:30] गुइलहर्मे मोंटेइरो: स्पेनिश भाषी देश अनिवार्य पुर्तगाली कक्षाओं के साथ और ब्राजील अनिवार्य स्पेनिश कक्षाओं के साथ
    [16/5 12:30] गुइलहर्मे मोंटेइरो: यह मर्कोसुर देशों को तेजी से एकीकृत करने का एक तरीका होगा
    [16/5 12:30] गुइलहर्मे मोंटेरो: और उनासुर भी
    [5/16 12:37] गुइलहर्मे मोंटेइरो: मैं पार्टियों को इसके बारे में बात करते हुए नहीं देखता… केवल पीसीटीबी (ब्राजील के श्रमिकों की कम्युनिस्ट पार्टी) इसके बारे में बात करती है और ओह एक और बीआर पार्टी

    Anônimo16 de maio de 2022 13:28
    [5/16 10:08] Guilherme Monteiro: تصميم المجوهرات جعلتني أستنتج أننا نحتاج حقًا إلى دورات التعليم الجامعي والعالي …
    [16/5 10:09] جيلهيرمي مونتيرو: ودورات أساسية ومتقدمة في اللغة الإنجليزية والإسبانية 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [5/16 10:10] Guilherme Monteiro: الآن أفهم سبب وجود الكثير من المتسربين في UFES ، وخاصة في علم الأحجار الكريمة
    [5/16 10:12] جيلهيرمي مونتيرو: سنضطر إلى الحصول على وظيفة كمتدرب أكبر حتى نتمكن من بدء العمل أيضًا.
    [16/5 10:13] جيلهيرم مونتيرو: إنه متطلب للغاية ، يبدو أننا حقًا في عام 1984 من التدريب والعمل والواجبات 🤣🤣🤣😶😶😶
    [16/5 12:07] غيلهيرم مونتيرو: حسنًا ، في البرازيل ، كان بإمكاني الحصول على دروس لتعليم اللغة الإسبانية من المدرسة الابتدائية ، تمامًا مثل فصول اللغة الإنجليزية
    [16/5 12:07] جيلهيرمي مونتيرو: حقًا ، هذا ضروري جدًا
    [16/5 12:07] جيلهيرمي مونتيرو: يجب أن يعرف البرازيليون كيفية التحدث بالبرتغالية والإنجليزية والإسبانية
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: أصبح تقريبًا التزامًا
    [16/5 12:08] جيلهيرمي مونتيرو: والبعض يدرج الفرنسية في هذه الوسيلة …
    [5/16 12:08] جيلهيرمي مونتيرو: وبعضها يشمل غواراني 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [16/5 12:08] جيلهيرمي مونتيرو: البرازيليون يتحدثون لغة الغواراني … هذا ما يعنيه أن تحب البرازيل حقًا 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [16/5 12:09] Guilherme Monteiro: Guarani يمكن أن تكون إحدى اللغات الرسمية لإسبريتو سانتو … إلى جانب البرتغالية والإيطالية والألمانية والبوميرانية 🤣🤣🤣😅😅😅
    [5/16 12:29] Guilherme Monteiro: يمكن لميركوسور أن يفعل شيئًا أكثر فائدة من مجرد لوحات ترخيص … ولكن شيئًا ما مثل ، التدريس الإلزامي للبرتغالية والإسبانية في المدارس
    [5/16 12:30] Guilherme Monteiro: البلدان الناطقة بالإسبانية مع دروس اللغة البرتغالية الإلزامية والبرازيل مع دروس اللغة الإسبانية الإلزامية
    [16/5 12:30] جيلهيرمي مونتيرو: سيكون وسيلة لدمج دول ميركوسور بشكل أسرع
    [16/5 12:30] جيلهيرمي مونتيرو: واتحاد أمم أمريكا الجنوبية أيضًا
    [5/16 12:37] Guilherme Monteiro: لا أرى الأطراف تتحدث عن ذلك … فقط PCTB (الحزب الشيوعي للعمال البرازيليين) يتحدث عنه وعن حزب BR آخر

    Anônimo16 de maio de 2022 13:28
    [5/16 10:08] Guilherme Monteiro: Projektowanie biżuterii Doszedłem do wniosku, że naprawdę potrzebujemy kursów licencjackich i wyższych…
    [16/5 10:09] Guilherme Monteiro: Oraz podstawowe i zaawansowane kursy angielskiego i hiszpańskiego 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [5/16 10:10] Guilherme Monteiro: Teraz rozumiem, dlaczego tak wielu odpada z UFES, zwłaszcza w gemmologii
    [5/16 10:12] Guilherme Monteiro: Będziemy musieli mieć pracę jako większy praktykant, aby móc zacząć pracować zbyt wolno…
    [16/5 10:13] Guilherme Monteiro: To takie wymagające, wydaje się, że naprawdę jesteśmy w 1984 roku szkolenia, pracy i obowiązków 🤣🤣🤣😶😶😶
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: Cóż, w Brazylii mógłbym mieć lekcje hiszpańskiego od podstawówki, tak jak lekcje angielskiego
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: Naprawdę, to jest bardzo potrzebne
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: Brazylijczycy powinni wiedzieć, jak mówić po portugalsku, angielsku i hiszpańsku
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: To stało się prawie obowiązkiem
    [16/5 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro: Niektórzy nawet używają francuskiego w tym medium…
    [5/16 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro: A kilku z nich to nawet Guarani 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [16/5 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro: Brazylijczycy mówią guarani… Tak to jest naprawdę kochać Brazylię 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [16/5 12:09] Guilherme Monteiro: Guarani może być jednym z oficjalnych języków Espírito Santo… Obok portugalskiego, włoskiego, niemieckiego i pomorskiego 🤣🤣🤣😅😅😅
    [5/16 12:29] Guilherme Monteiro: Mercosur mógłby zrobić coś bardziej przydatnego niż tylko tablice rejestracyjne… Ale coś w rodzaju obowiązkowej nauki języka portugalskiego i hiszpańskiego w szkołach
    [5/16 12:30] Guilherme Monteiro: kraje hiszpańskojęzyczne z obowiązkowymi lekcjami języka portugalskiego i Brazylia z obowiązkowymi lekcjami hiszpańskiego
    [16.05.12:30] Guilherme Monteiro: Byłby to sposób na szybszą integrację krajów Mercosur
    [16.05.12:30] Guilherme Monteiro: I UNASUR też
    [5/16 12:37] Guilherme Monteiro: Nie widzę, żeby partie o tym rozmawiały… Mówi o tym tylko PCTB (Komunistyczna Partia Robotników Brazylii) i och inna partia BR

    Anônimo16 de maio de 2022 13:28
    [5/16 10:08] Guilherme Monteiro: Desain Perhiasan Saya membuat saya menyimpulkan bahwa kita sangat membutuhkan program sarjana dan pendidikan tinggi…
    [16/5 10:09] Guilherme Monteiro: Dan kursus bahasa Inggris dan Spanyol dasar dan lanjutan
    [5/16 10:10] Guilherme Monteiro: Sekarang saya mengerti mengapa begitu banyak yang putus sekolah di UFES, terutama di bidang gemologi
    [5/16 10:12] Guilherme Monteiro: Kita harus memiliki pekerjaan sebagai pekerja magang yang lebih besar untuk dapat mulai bekerja juga lol…
    [16/5 10:13] Guilherme Monteiro: Ini sangat menuntut, sepertinya kita benar-benar berada di tahun 1984 pelatihan, pekerjaan, dan tugas
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: Nah, di Brasil, saya bisa mendapatkan kelas bahasa Spanyol dari sekolah dasar, sama seperti kelas bahasa Inggris
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: Sungguh, ini sangat perlu
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: Orang Brasil harus tahu cara berbicara bahasa Portugis, Inggris, dan Spanyol
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: Hampir menjadi kewajiban
    [16/5 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro: Dan beberapa bahkan memasukkan bahasa Prancis dalam media ini…
    [5/16 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro: Dan beberapa bahkan termasuk Guarani
    [16/5 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro: Orang Brasil berbicara bahasa Guarani… Seperti itulah rasanya mencintai Brasil
    [16/5 12:09] Guilherme Monteiro: Guarani bisa menjadi salah satu bahasa resmi Espírito Santo… Bersama dengan Portugis, Italia, Jerman, dan Pomeranian
    [5/16 12:29] Guilherme Monteiro: Mercosur bisa melakukan sesuatu yang lebih berguna daripada sekadar plat nomor… Tapi sesuatu seperti, pengajaran wajib bahasa Portugis dan Spanyol di sekolah
    [16/5 12:30] Guilherme Monteiro: Negara-negara berbahasa Spanyol dengan kelas bahasa Portugis wajib dan Brasil dengan kelas bahasa Spanyol wajib
    [16/5 12:30] Guilherme Monteiro: Ini akan menjadi cara untuk mengintegrasikan negara-negara Mercosur lebih cepat
    [16/5 12:30] Guilherme Monteiro: Dan UNASUR juga
    [5/16 12:37] Guilherme Monteiro: Saya tidak melihat partai-partai membicarakannya… Hanya PCTB (Partai Komunis Pekerja Brasil) yang membicarakannya dan oh partai BR lainnya

    Anônimo16 de maio de 2022 13:29
    [5/16 10:08] Guilherme Monteiro: עיצוב תכשיטים גרמתי לי להסיק שאנחנו באמת צריכים קורסים לתואר ראשון והשכלה גבוהה…
    [16/5 10:09] Guilherme Monteiro: וקורסי אנגלית וספרדית בסיסיים ומתקדמים 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [5/16 10:10] Guilherme Monteiro: עכשיו אני מבין למה כל כך הרבה נושרים ב-UFES, במיוחד בגמולוגיה
    [5/16 10:12] גילהרמה מונטיירו: נצטרך לעבוד בתור חניך גדול יותר כדי שנוכל להתחיל לעבוד יותר מדי חחח…
    [16/5 10:13] גילרמה מונטיירו: זה כל כך תובעני, זה נראה כאילו אנחנו באמת ב-1984 של הכשרה, עבודה וחובות 🤣🤣🤣😶😶😶
    [16/5 12:07] גילהרמה מונטירו: ובכן, בברזיל, יכולתי לקבל שיעורי ספרדית מבית הספר היסודי, בדיוק כמו שיעורי אנגלית
    [16/5 12:07] גילהרמה מונטיירו: באמת, זה מאוד הכרחי
    [16/5 12:07] גילהרמה מונטיירו: הברזילאים צריכים לדעת לדבר פורטוגזית, אנגלית וספרדית
    [16/5 12:07] גילהרמה מונטיירו: זה הפך להיות כמעט חובה
    [16/5 12:08] גילהרמה מונטיירו: וחלקם אפילו כוללים צרפתית במדיום הזה…
    [5/16 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro: וכמה מהם אפילו כוללים גוארני 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [16/5 12:08] גילהרמה מונטיירו: ברזילאים מדברים גוארני… ככה זה באמת לאהוב את ברזיל 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [16/5 12:09] גילהרמה מונטירו: גוארני יכולה להיות אחת מהשפות הרשמיות של אספיריטו סנטו… יחד עם פורטוגזית, איטלקית, גרמנית ופומרנית 🤣🤣🤣😅😅😅
    [5/16 12:29] גילהרמה מונטירו: מרקוסור יכול לעשות משהו יותר שימושי מסתם לוחיות רישוי… אבל משהו כמו, הוראת חובה של פורטוגזית וספרדית בבתי ספר
    [5/16 12:30] Guilherme Monteiro: מדינות דוברות ספרדית עם שיעורי חובה בפורטוגזית וברזיל עם שיעורי חובה ספרדית
    [16/5 12:30] גילהרמה מונטיירו: זו תהיה דרך לשלב את מדינות מרקוסור מהר יותר
    [16/5 12:30] גילהרמה מונטיירו: וגם UNASUR
    [5/16 12:37] גילהרמה מונטיירו: אני לא רואה את המפלגות מדברות על זה… רק ה-PCTB (המפלגה הקומוניסטית של פועלים ברזילאים) מדברת על זה ועוד מפלגת BR

    Anônimo16 de maio de 2022 13:30
    [5/16 10:08] Guilherme Monteiro: طراحی جواهرات من باعث شدم به این نتیجه برسم که ما واقعاً به دوره های آموزش عالی و کارشناسی نیاز داریم…
    [16/5 10:09] Guilherme Monteiro: و دوره های مقدماتی و پیشرفته انگلیسی و اسپانیایی 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [5/16 10:10] Guilherme Monteiro: اکنون می فهمم که چرا این همه ترک تحصیل در UFES، به ویژه در گوهرشناسی
    [5/16 10:12] Guilherme Monteiro: ما باید به عنوان یک شاگرد بزرگتر شغل داشته باشیم تا بتوانیم بیش از حد شروع به کار کنیم!
    [16/5 10:13] Guilherme Monteiro: خیلی سخت است، به نظر می رسد که ما واقعاً در سال 1984 از آموزش، کار و وظایف هستیم 🤣🤣🤣😶😶
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: خوب، در برزیل، من می توانستم از مدرسه ابتدایی کلاس های اسپانیایی داشته باشم، درست مانند کلاس های انگلیسی
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: واقعاً، این بسیار ضروری است
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: برزیلی ها باید بدانند چگونه پرتغالی، انگلیسی و اسپانیایی صحبت کنند.
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: تقریباً یک تعهد شد
    [16/5 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro: و برخی حتی زبان فرانسه را در این رسانه گنجانده اند…
    [5/16 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro: و حتی چند مورد شامل گوارانی است 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [16/5 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro: برزیلی‌ها گوارانی صحبت می‌کنند… دوست داشتن برزیل واقعاً اینگونه است 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [16/5 12:09] Guilherme Monteiro: گوارانی می تواند یکی از زبان های رسمی اسپریتو سانتو باشد… در کنار پرتغالی، ایتالیایی، آلمانی و پومرانیایی 🤣🤣🤣😅😅😅
    [5/16 12:29] Guilherme Monteiro: Mercosur می تواند کاری مفیدتر از پلاک خودرو انجام دهد… اما چیزی شبیه به آموزش اجباری پرتغالی و اسپانیایی در مدارس
    [5/16 12:30] Guilherme Monteiro: کشورهای اسپانیایی زبان با کلاس های اجباری پرتغالی و برزیل با کلاس های اجباری اسپانیایی
    [16/5 12:30] Guilherme Monteiro: این راهی برای ادغام سریعتر کشورهای مرکوسور خواهد بود
    [16/5 12:30] Guilherme Monteiro: و UNASUR نیز
    [5/16 12:37] Guilherme Monteiro: من نمی بینم که احزاب در مورد آن صحبت می کنند… فقط PCTB (حزب کمونیست کارگران برزیل) در مورد آن صحبت می کند و یک حزب دیگر BR

    Anônimo16 de maio de 2022 13:30
    [5/16 10:08] Гільєрме Монтейро: Дизайн ювелірних виробів Я змусив мене зробити висновок, що нам справді потрібні курси бакалаврату та вищої освіти…
    [16/5 10:09] Гільєрме Монтейру: А також базові та поглиблені курси англійської та іспанської 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [5/16 10:10] Гільєрме Монтейру: Тепер я розумію, чому так багато відсіків у UFES, особливо в геммології
    [5/16 10:12] Гільєрме Монтейру: Нам доведеться працювати великим учнем, щоб мати можливість почати працювати надто лол…
    [16/5 10:13] Гільєрме Монтейру: Це так вимогливо, здається, що ми справді перебуваємо в 1984 році навчання, роботи та обов’язків 🤣🤣🤣😶😶😶
    [16/5 12:07] Гільєрме Монтейру: Ну, у Бразилії я міг би мати уроки іспанської мови з початкової школи, так само, як уроки англійської
    [16/5 12:07] Гільєрме Монтейру: Справді, це дуже потрібно
    [16/5 12:07] Гільєрме Монтейру: бразильці повинні знати, як говорити португальською, англійською та іспанською
    [16/5 12:07] Гільєрме Монтейру: Це стало майже обов’язком
    [16/5 12:08] Гільєрме Монтейру: І деякі навіть включають французьку мову в цей засіб…
    [5/16 12:08] Гільєрме Монтейру: І деякі з них навіть включають гуарані 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [16/5 12:08] Гільєрме Монтейру: Бразильці говорять на гуарані… Ось як це – справді любити Бразилію 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [16/5 12:09] Гільєрме Монтейру: гуарані може бути однією з офіційних мов Еспіріту-Санту… Поряд з португальською, італійською, німецькою та поморською 🤣🤣🤣😅😅😅
    [5/16 12:29] Гільєрме Монтейру: Mercosur міг би зробити щось корисніше, ніж просто номерні знаки… Але щось на кшталт обов’язкового викладання португальської та іспанської мов у школах
    [5/16 12:30] Гільєрме Монтейру: іспаномовні країни з обов’язковими уроками португальської мови та Бразилія з обов’язковими уроками іспанської мови
    [16/5 12:30] Гільєрме Монтейру: Це був би спосіб швидше інтегрувати країни МЕРКОСУР
    [16/5 12:30] Гільєрме Монтейру: І УНАСУР теж
    [5/16 12:37] Гільєрме Монтейру: Я не бачу, щоб партії про це говорили… Тільки PCTB (Комуністична партія бразильських робітників) говорить про це та ще одна партія БР

    Anônimo16 de maio de 2022 13:30
    [5/16 10:08] Guilherme Monteiro: জুয়েলারি ডিজাইন আমি আমাকে এই উপসংহারে পৌঁছে দিয়েছি যে আমাদের সত্যিই স্নাতক এবং উচ্চ শিক্ষার কোর্স প্রয়োজন…
    [16/5 10:09] Guilherme Monteiro: এবং মৌলিক এবং উন্নত ইংরেজি এবং স্প্যানিশ কোর্স 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [5/16 10:10] Guilherme Monteiro: এখন আমি বুঝতে পারছি কেন UFES-এ এত ড্রপআউট, বিশেষ করে রত্নবিদ্যায়
    [5/16 10:12] গুইলহার্মে মন্টিরো: খুব বেশি কাজ শুরু করতে সক্ষম হওয়ার জন্য আমাদের একটি বড় শিক্ষানবিস হিসাবে একটি চাকরি থাকতে হবে…
    [16/5 10:13] Guilherme Monteiro: এটা খুবই চাহিদাপূর্ণ, মনে হচ্ছে আমরা সত্যিই 1984 সালের প্রশিক্ষণ, কাজ এবং দায়িত্বের মধ্যে আছি 🤣🤣🤣😶😶😶
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: ঠিক আছে, ব্রাজিলে, আমি প্রাথমিক বিদ্যালয় থেকে ইংরেজি ক্লাসের মতো স্প্যানিশ ক্লাস করতে পারতাম
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: সত্যিই, এটা খুবই প্রয়োজনীয়
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: ব্রাজিলিয়ানদের জানা উচিত কিভাবে পর্তুগিজ, ইংরেজি এবং স্প্যানিশ বলতে হয়
    [16/5 12:07] Guilherme Monteiro: এটি প্রায় একটি বাধ্যবাধকতা হয়ে উঠেছে
    [16/5 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro: এবং কেউ কেউ এই মাধ্যমে ফরাসিও অন্তর্ভুক্ত করে…
    [5/16 12:08] Guilherme Monteiro: এবং কয়েকজন এমনকি গুয়ারানিও অন্তর্ভুক্ত করে 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [16/5 12:08] গুইলহার্মে মন্টেইরো: ব্রাজিলিয়ানরা গুয়ারানি ভাষায় কথা বলছে… সত্যিকারের ব্রাজিলকে ভালোবাসলে এটাই ভালো লাগে 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    [16/5 12:09] গুইলহার্মে মন্টেইরো: গুয়ারানি হতে পারে এস্পিরিটো সান্তোর সরকারী ভাষাগুলির মধ্যে একটি… পর্তুগিজ, ইতালীয়, জার্মান এবং পোমেরানিয়ান 🤣🤣🤣😅😅😅
    [5/16 12:29] Guilherme Monteiro: Mercosur শুধুমাত্র লাইসেন্স প্লেট ছাড়া আরও দরকারী কিছু করতে পারে… কিন্তু কিছু, স্কুলে পর্তুগিজ এবং স্প্যানিশ বাধ্যতামূলক শিক্ষা
    [5/16 12:30] Guilherme Monteiro: বাধ্যতামূলক পর্তুগিজ ক্লাস সহ স্প্যানিশ ভাষাভাষী দেশ এবং বাধ্যতামূলক স্প্যানিশ ক্লাস সহ ব্রাজিল
    [16/5 12:30] গুইলহার্মে মন্টেইরো: এটি মারকোসুর দেশগুলিকে দ্রুত সংহত করার একটি উপায় হবে
    [16/5 12:30] Guilherme Monteiro: এবং UNASURও
    [5/16 12:37] Guilherme Monteiro: আমি দলগুলোকে এটা নিয়ে কথা বলতে দেখছি না… শুধু PCTB (Brazilian Workers এর কমিউনিস্ট পার্টি) এটা নিয়ে কথা বলে আর একটা BR পার্টি

    Responder

    https://frenterevolucionariadostrabalhadores.blogspot.com/2022/05/por-que-e-por-quem-eu-luto-cosme-lopes.html?showComment=1652718156040#c1777911868470171050

  9. “O fator crença está em todos os lugares, inclusive na própria ciência, ateísmo, antiteísmo, “ceticismo”, “livre pensamento”, “pensamento crítico”, racionalidade, lógica, evidência, evidencialismo, cientificismo, niilismo, neopositivismo etc.”

    “A ciência é mesmo uma religião, uma ideologia e uma crença. Basta olhar para a Internet, para a mídia de massa e para a Academia.”

    “O anti-antiteísmo e o antiateísmo devem vir acompanhados do anticapitalismo, antineoliberalismo, antidireitismo, anti-anticomunismo, anti-antissocialismo e do anti-antiesquerdismo.”

    “O antifascismo só é possível com anticapitalismo, antineoliberalismo, antidireitismo, anti-anticomunismo, anti-antissocialismo e anti-antiesquerdismo.”

    “É assim que os políticos, empresários, capitalistas, neoliberais e direitistas nos tratam… Pior do que macacos em jaulas de circo.”

    “Filósofo, ensaísta, polemista, cientista social e anunnakista Guilherme Monteiro Junior.”

    “Eu realmente devia trabalhar as minhas teorias filosóficas e sociológicas, e é isso que vou tentar fazer daqui pra frente.”

    “Somos muito mais do que apenas uns e zeros e do que simples “robôs de carne” ou “robôs biológicos”. E existem vários argumentos e até mesmo provas de que somos mais do que isso… Assim como argumentos e provas da existência de deuses, seres espirituais, formas de vida pós-física, formas de vida extrafísica, religião, espiritualidade, esoterismo, mediunidade, psiquicidade, projeção astral, multiverso, extrafísica, metafísica, vida após a morte etc.”

    “Vivemos em um mundo de neurodiversidade, subjetividade, relatividade, crença, opinião, ideologia, religião e de credulidade.”

    “Precisamos de mais filósofos e pensadores marxistas, comunistas, pósmodernistas, anunnakistas, anticapitalistas, antineoliberais, antidireitistas, antiateus, anti-antiteístas, extrafisicalistas, extranaturalistas, extramaterialistas, panpsiquistas, anticiência críticos, anticientificistas críticos, neurodivergentistas universais, anti-anticoletivistas, biocoletivistas, bioigualitaristas (bioequalistas), igualitaristas sapientes (equalistas sapientes), antitransumanistas, antimaterialistas, antievidencialistas e afins.”

    “Cada vez mais eu me sinto sozinho e solitário, perdido nos meus pensamentos e na minha grafomania.”

    “As vezes eu realmente penso em apoiar o transumanismo quântico (quantumismo) e o transumanismo nanotecnológico.”

    “Só pelo fato de que eu tenho mais certeza como comunista do que como anunnakista mostra o quanto que eu preciso de propaganda anunnakista, antiateísta e anti-antiteísta até eu ter certeza que eu sou anunnakista como que eu sou comunista.”

    “Preciso melhorar minha relação com os meus deuses e cada vez mais ficar mais perto e conectado aos mesmos.”

    “Tudo bem ser “irracional”, irracionalidade e racionalidade são relativas e subjetivas.”

    “”Esquizotérico” é realmente um termo fanático ateu e antiteísta, igual “mumbojumbo.”

    “Dá para escrever diversos livros e artigos sobre mim e sobre meus trabalhos, é só alguém fazer isso, alguém que me apoie e que é influenciado por mim.”

    “O transumanismo quântico (quantumismo) e o transumanismo nanotecnológico podem sim ser bem úteis e importantes no futuro, mas os mesmos precisam ser mais explorados e desenvolvidos, e também substituírem o transumanismo clássico ou ganharem o mesmo espaço que o transumanismo clássico tem hoje em dia.”

    “O transumanismo nanotecnológico é como o transumanismo quântico (quantumismo), mas com nanotecnologia ao invés de tecnoquântica (tecnologias quânticas, tecnologias que trabalham a nível quântico).””The belief factor is everywhere, including in science itself, atheism, antitheism, “skepticism”, “free thinking”, “critical thinking”, rationality, logic, evidence, evidentialism, scientism, nihilism, neopositivism etc.”

    “Science is really a religion, an ideology and a belief. Just look at the Internet, the mass media and the Academy.”

    “Anti-antitheism and anti-atheism must be accompanied by anti-capitalism, anti-neoliberalism, anti-rightism, anti-communism, anti-anti-socialism and anti-anti-leftism.”

    “Anti-fascism is only possible with anti-capitalism, anti-neoliberalism, anti-rightism, anti-anti-communism, anti-anti-socialism and anti-anti-leftism.”

    “This is how politicians, businessmen, capitalists, neoliberals and rightists treat us… Worse than monkeys in circus cages.”

    “Philosopher, essayist, polemicist, social scientist and anunnakist Guilherme Monteiro Junior.”

    “I really should work on my philosophical and sociological theories, and that’s what I’m going to try to do from now on.”

    “We are much more than just ones and zeros and than simple “meat robots” or “biological robots.” And there are many arguments and even proofs that we are more than that… As well as arguments and proofs of existence. of gods, spiritual beings, post-physical life forms, extraphysical life forms, religion, spirituality, esotericism, mediumship, psyche, astral projection, multiverse, extraphysical, metaphysics, life after death, etc.”

    “We live in a world of neurodiversity, subjectivity, relativity, belief, opinion, ideology, religion and credulity.”

    “We need more Marxist, communist, postmodernist, anunnakist, anti-capitalist, anti-neoliberal, anti-rightist, anti-atheist, anti-antitheist, extraphysicalist, extranaturalist, extramaterialist, panpsychist, critical antiscience, critical antiscientist, universal neurodivergent, anti-anti-collectivist, bio-collectivist, philosophers and thinkers bioegalitarians (bioequalists), wise egalitarians (sapient equalists), anti-transhumanists, anti-materialists, anti-evidentialists, and the like.”

    “More and more I feel alone and lonely, lost in my thoughts and my graphomania.”

    “Sometimes I really think about supporting quantum transhumanism (quantumism) and nanotechnology transhumanism.”

    “Just the fact that I’m more sure as a communist than as an Anunnakist shows how much I need Anunnakist, anti-theist and anti-antitheist propaganda until I’m sure I’m an Anunnakist as I am a communist.”

    “I need to improve my relationship with my gods and get closer and more connected to them.”

    “It’s okay to be “irrational”, irrationality and rationality are relative and subjective.”

    “”Schizoteric” is really a fanatical atheist and antitheistic term, like “mumbojumbo.”

    “You can write a lot of books and articles about me and my work, it’s just someone who does it, someone who supports me and who is influenced by me.”

    “Quantum transhumanism (quantumism) and nanotechnological transhumanism can indeed be very useful and important in the future, but they need to be further explored and developed, and also replace classical transhumanism or gain the same space that classical transhumanism has today. .”

    “Nanotechnological transhumanism is like quantum transhumanism (quantumism), but with nanotechnology instead of technoquantum (quantum technologies, technologies that work at the quantum level).””El factor creencia está en todas partes, incluso en la ciencia misma, el ateísmo, el antiteísmo, el “escepticismo”, el “pensamiento libre”, el “pensamiento crítico”, la racionalidad, la lógica, la evidencia, el evidencialismo, el cientificismo, el nihilismo, el neopositivismo, etc.

    “La ciencia es realmente una religión, una ideología y una creencia. Basta con mirar Internet, los medios de comunicación y la Academia”.

    “El antiantiteísmo y el antiateísmo deben ir acompañados del anticapitalismo, el antineoliberalismo, el antiderechismo, el anticomunismo, el antisocialismo y el antiizquierdismo”.

    “El antifascismo solo es posible con el anticapitalismo, el antineoliberalismo, el antiderechismo, el anticomunismo, el antisocialismo y el antiizquierdismo”.

    “Así nos tratan los políticos, empresarios, capitalistas, neoliberales y derechistas… Peor que monos en jaulas de circo”.

    “Filósofo, ensayista, polemista, científico social y anunnakista Guilherme Monteiro Junior”.

    “Realmente debería trabajar en mis teorías filosóficas y sociológicas, y eso es lo que intentaré hacer de ahora en adelante”.

    “Somos mucho más que unos y ceros y que simples “robots de carne” o “robots biológicos”. Y hay muchos argumentos e incluso pruebas de que somos más que eso… Además de argumentos y pruebas de existencia. dioses, seres espirituales, formas de vida postfísicas, formas de vida extrafísicas, religión, espiritualidad, esoterismo, mediumnidad, psique, proyección astral, multiverso, extrafísica, metafísica, vida después de la muerte, etc.”

    “Vivimos en un mundo de neurodiversidad, subjetividad, relatividad, creencia, opinión, ideología, religión y credulidad”.

    “Necesitamos más marxistas, comunistas, posmodernistas, anunnakistas, anticapitalistas, antineoliberales, antiderechistas, antiateos, antiantiteístas, extrafisicalistas, extranaturalistas, extramaterialistas, panpsiquistas, anticientíficos críticos, anticientíficos críticos, neurodivergentes universales, anti -anti-colectivistas, bio-colectivistas, filósofos y pensadores bioigualitarios (bioigualitarios), sabios igualitarios (sapientes igualistas), anti-transhumanistas, anti-materialistas, anti-evidencialistas, y similares”.

    “Cada vez me siento más solo y solo, perdido en mis pensamientos y mi grafomanía”.

    “A veces realmente pienso en apoyar el transhumanismo cuántico (quantumism) y el transhumanismo de la nanotecnología”.

    “Solo el hecho de que estoy más seguro como comunista que como anunnakista muestra cuánto necesito propaganda anunnakista, antiteísta y antiantiteísta hasta que esté seguro de que soy anunnakista como comunista”.

    “Necesito mejorar mi relación con mis dioses y acercarme y conectarme más con ellos”.

    “Está bien ser ‘irracional’, la irracionalidad y la racionalidad son relativas y subjetivas”.

    “”Esquizotérico” es realmente un término ateo fanático y antiteísta, como “tonterías”.

    “Puedes escribir muchos libros y artículos sobre mí y mi trabajo, es solo alguien que lo hace, alguien que me apoya y que está influenciado por mí”.

    “El transhumanismo cuántico (cuantumismo) y el transhumanismo nanotecnológico pueden ser muy útiles e importantes en el futuro, pero necesitan ser explorados y desarrollados más, y también reemplazar al transhumanismo clásico o ganar el mismo espacio que el transhumanismo clásico tiene hoy”.

    “El transhumanismo nanotecnológico es como el transhumanismo cuántico (quantumism), pero con nanotecnología en lugar de tecnoquantum (tecnologías cuánticas, tecnologías que funcionan a nivel cuántico)”.”Le facteur de croyance est partout, y compris dans la science elle-même, l’athéisme, l’antithéisme, le “scepticisme”, la “libre pensée”, la “pensée critique”, la rationalité, la logique, les preuves, l’évidentialisme, le scientisme, le nihilisme, le néopositivisme, etc.”

    “La science est vraiment une religion, une idéologie et une croyance. Il suffit de regarder Internet, les médias et l’Académie.”

    “L’anti-antithéisme et l’anti-athéisme doivent être accompagnés par l’anticapitalisme, l’anti-néolibéralisme, l’anti-droitisme, l’anti-communisme, l’anti-anti-socialisme et l’anti-anti-gauchisme.”

    “L’antifascisme n’est possible qu’avec l’anticapitalisme, l’anti-néolibéralisme, l’anti-droite, l’anti-anticommunisme, l’anti-antisocialisme et l’anti-anti-gauchisme.”

    “C’est ainsi que nous traitent les politiciens, les hommes d’affaires, les capitalistes, les néolibéraux et les droitiers… Pire que des singes dans des cages de cirque.”

    “Philosophe, essayiste, polémiste, sociologue et anunnakiste Guilherme Monteiro Junior.”

    “Je devrais vraiment travailler sur mes théories philosophiques et sociologiques, et c’est ce que je vais essayer de faire désormais.”

    “Nous sommes bien plus que des uns et des zéros et que de simples “robots à viande” ou “robots biologiques”. Et il existe de nombreux arguments et même des preuves que nous sommes plus que cela… Ainsi que des arguments et des preuves d’existence. dieux, êtres spirituels, formes de vie post-physiques, formes de vie extraphysiques, religion, spiritualité, ésotérisme, médiumnité, psyché, projection astrale, multivers, extraphysique, métaphysique, vie après la mort, etc.”

    “Nous vivons dans un monde de neurodiversité, de subjectivité, de relativité, de croyance, d’opinion, d’idéologie, de religion et de crédulité.”

    “Nous avons besoin de plus de marxistes, de communistes, de postmodernistes, d’anunnakistes, d’anticapitalistes, d’anti-néolibéraux, d’anti-droitiers, d’anti-athées, d’anti-antithéistes, d’extraphysicalistes, d’extranaturalistes, d’extramatérialistes, de panpsychistes, d’antisciences critiques, d’antiscientifiques critiques, de neurodivergents universels, d’anti -anti-collectivistes, bio-collectivistes, philosophes et penseurs bioégalitaristes (bioégalitaristes), égalitaristes sages (égalistes sapients), anti-transhumanistes, anti-matérialistes, anti-évidentialistes, etc.”

    “Je me sens de plus en plus seule et solitaire, perdue dans mes pensées et ma graphomanie.”

    “Parfois, je pense vraiment à soutenir le transhumanisme quantique (quantumisme) et le transhumanisme nanotechnologique.”

    “Le simple fait que je sois plus sûr en tant que communiste qu’en tant qu’anunnakiste montre à quel point j’ai besoin de propagande anunnakiste, anti-théiste et anti-antithéiste jusqu’à ce que je sois sûr que je suis anunnakiste comme je suis communiste.”

    “J’ai besoin d’améliorer ma relation avec mes dieux et de me rapprocher d’eux.”

    “C’est normal d’être “irrationnel”, l’irrationalité et la rationalité sont relatives et subjectives.”

    « « Schizoteric » est vraiment un terme fanatique athée et antithéiste, comme « mumbojumbo ».

    “Vous pouvez écrire beaucoup de livres et d’articles sur moi et mon travail, c’est juste quelqu’un qui le fait, quelqu’un qui me soutient et qui est influencé par moi.”

    “Le transhumanisme quantique (quantumisme) et le transhumanisme nanotechnologique peuvent en effet être très utiles et importants à l’avenir, mais ils doivent être davantage explorés et développés, et également remplacer le transhumanisme classique ou gagner le même espace que le transhumanisme classique a aujourd’hui. . ”

    “Le transhumanisme nanotechnologique est comme le transhumanisme quantique (quantumisme), mais avec la nanotechnologie au lieu du technoquantique (technologies quantiques, technologies qui fonctionnent au niveau quantique).”„Der Glaubensfaktor ist überall, einschließlich in der Wissenschaft selbst, Atheismus, Antitheismus, „Skeptizismus“, „freies Denken“, „kritisches Denken“, Rationalität, Logik, Beweise, Evidenzismus, Szientismus, Nihilismus, Neopositivismus usw.“

    “Wissenschaft ist wirklich eine Religion, eine Ideologie und ein Glaube. Schauen Sie sich nur das Internet, die Massenmedien und die Akademie an.”

    “Anti-Antitheismus und Anti-Atheismus müssen von Anti-Kapitalismus, Anti-Neoliberalismus, Anti-Rechts-, Anti-Kommunismus-, Anti-Anti-Sozialismus- und Anti-Anti-Links-Bewegung begleitet werden.”

    “Antifaschismus ist nur möglich mit Antikapitalismus, Antineoliberalismus, Antirechtismus, Antiantikommunismus, Antiantisozialismus und Antiantilinks.”

    „So behandeln uns Politiker, Geschäftsleute, Kapitalisten, Neoliberale und Rechte … Schlimmer als Affen in Zirkuskäfigen.“

    “Philosoph, Essayist, Polemiker, Sozialwissenschaftler und Anunnakist Guilherme Monteiro Junior.”

    “Ich sollte wirklich an meinen philosophischen und soziologischen Theorien arbeiten, und das werde ich von nun an versuchen.”

    „Wir sind viel mehr als nur Einsen und Nullen und als einfache „Fleischroboter“ oder „biologische Roboter.“ Und es gibt viele Argumente und sogar Beweise dafür, dass wir mehr sind als das … Sowie Argumente und Existenzbeweise Götter, spirituelle Wesen, postphysische Lebensformen, außerphysische Lebensformen, Religion, Spiritualität, Esoterik, Medialität, Psyche, Astralprojektion, Multiversum, Extraphysisches, Metaphysik, Leben nach dem Tod usw.“

    „Wir leben in einer Welt der Neurodiversität, Subjektivität, Relativität, Glauben, Meinung, Ideologie, Religion und Leichtgläubigkeit.“

    „Wir brauchen mehr Marxisten, Kommunisten, Postmodernisten, Anunnakisten, Antikapitalisten, Antineoliberalen, Antirechten, Antiatheisten, Antiantitheisten, Extraphysikalisten, Extranaturalisten, Extramaterialisten, Panpsychisten, kritische Antiwissenschaft, kritische Antiwissenschaft, universelle Neurodivergente, Anti -Antikollektivisten, Biokollektivisten, Philosophen und Denker, Bioegalitäre (Bioequalisten), weise Egalitäre (kluge Gleichmacher), Antitranshumanisten, Antimaterialisten, Antievidentialisten und dergleichen.”

    “Ich fühle mich immer mehr allein und einsam, verloren in meinen Gedanken und meiner Graphomanie.”

    “Manchmal denke ich wirklich darüber nach, den Quanten-Transhumanismus (Quantumismus) und den Nanotechnologie-Transhumanismus zu unterstützen.”

    “Allein die Tatsache, dass ich mir als Kommunist sicherer bin als als Anunnakist, zeigt, wie sehr ich anunnakistische, antitheistische und anti-antitheistische Propaganda brauche, bis ich sicher bin, dass ich ein Anunnakist bin, wie ich ein Kommunist bin.”

    „Ich muss meine Beziehung zu meinen Göttern verbessern und näher und mehr mit ihnen verbunden sein.“

    “Es ist okay, “irrational” zu sein, Irrationalität und Rationalität sind relativ und subjektiv.”

    „„Schizoterik“ ist eigentlich ein fanatischer atheistischer und antitheistischer Begriff, wie „Mumbojumbo“.

    “Man kann viele Bücher und Artikel über mich und meine Arbeit schreiben, es ist nur jemand, der es tut, jemand, der mich unterstützt und von mir beeinflusst wird.”

    „Der Quantentranshumanismus (Quantumismus) und der nanotechnologische Transhumanismus können in der Zukunft zwar sehr nützlich und wichtig sein, müssen aber weiter erforscht und weiterentwickelt werden und auch den klassischen Transhumanismus ersetzen oder den gleichen Raum gewinnen, den der klassische Transhumanismus heute hat.“

    “Nanotechnologischer Transhumanismus ist wie Quanten-Transhumanismus (Quantumismus), aber mit Nanotechnologie statt Technoquantum (Quantentechnologien, Technologien, die auf Quantenebene arbeiten).””De factor geloof is overal, ook in de wetenschap zelf, atheïsme, antitheïsme, “scepticisme”, “vrij denken”, “kritisch denken”, rationaliteit, logica, bewijs, evidentialisme, sciëntisme, nihilisme, neopositivisme enz.”

    “Wetenschap is echt een religie, een ideologie en een geloof. Kijk maar naar internet, de massamedia en de Academie.”

    “Anti-antitheïsme en anti-atheïsme moeten gepaard gaan met anti-kapitalisme, anti-neoliberalisme, anti-rechts, anti-communisme, anti-anti-socialisme en anti-anti-links.”

    “Antifascisme is alleen mogelijk met antikapitalisme, anti-neoliberalisme, anti-rechts, anti-anti-communisme, anti-anti-socialisme en anti-anti-links.”

    “Dit is hoe politici, zakenlieden, kapitalisten, neoliberalen en rechtsen ons behandelen… Erger dan apen in circuskooien.”

    “Filosof, essayist, polemist, sociaal wetenschapper en anunnakist Guilherme Monteiro Junior.”

    “Ik zou echt aan mijn filosofische en sociologische theorieën moeten werken, en dat ga ik vanaf nu proberen te doen.”

    “We zijn veel meer dan alleen enen en nullen en dan simpele “vleesrobots” of “biologische robots.” En er zijn veel argumenten en zelfs bewijzen dat we meer zijn dan dat… Evenals argumenten en bewijzen van bestaan. goden, spirituele wezens, post-fysieke levensvormen, buitenfysieke levensvormen, religie, spiritualiteit, esoterie, mediumschap, psyche, astrale projectie, multiversum, buitenlichamelijk, metafysica, leven na de dood, enz.”

    “We leven in een wereld van neurodiversiteit, subjectiviteit, relativiteit, geloof, mening, ideologie, religie en goedgelovigheid.”

    “We hebben meer marxisten, communisten, postmodernisten, anunnakisten, anti-kapitalisten, anti-neoliberale, anti-rechtse, anti-atheïsten, anti-antitheïsten, extrafysische, extranaturalistische, extramaterialistische, panpsychist, kritische antiwetenschap, kritische antiwetenschapper, universele neurodivergent, anti -anti-collectivisten, bio-collectivisten, filosofen en denkers bio-egalitaristen (bio-egalisten), wijze egalitaristen (sapient-equalisten), anti-transhumanisten, anti-materialisten, anti-evidentialisten, en dergelijke.”

    “Meer en meer voel ik me alleen en eenzaam, verloren in mijn gedachten en mijn grafomanie.”

    “Soms denk ik echt na over het ondersteunen van kwantumtranshumanisme (kwantumisme) en nanotechnologie-transhumanisme.”

    “Alleen het feit dat ik zekerder ben als communist dan als anunnakist laat zien hoeveel ik anunnakist, anti-theïst en anti-antitheïstische propaganda nodig heb, totdat ik zeker weet dat ik een anunnakist ben zoals ik een communist ben.”

    “Ik moet mijn relatie met mijn goden verbeteren en dichter en meer met hen verbonden worden.”

    “Het is oké om ‘irrationeel’ te zijn, irrationaliteit en rationaliteit zijn relatief en subjectief.”

    “”Schizoteric” is echt een fanatieke atheïstische en antitheïstische term, zoals “mumbojumbo.”

    “Je kunt veel boeken en artikelen over mij en mijn werk schrijven. Het is gewoon iemand die het doet, iemand die mij steunt en door mij wordt beïnvloed.”

    “Quantumtranshumanisme (kwantumisme) en nanotechnologisch transhumanisme kunnen in de toekomst inderdaad heel nuttig en belangrijk zijn, maar ze moeten verder worden verkend en ontwikkeld, en ook het klassieke transhumanisme vervangen of dezelfde ruimte krijgen die het klassieke transhumanisme vandaag heeft.”

    “Nanotechnologisch transhumanisme is als kwantumtranshumanisme (kwantumisme), maar met nanotechnologie in plaats van technoquantum (kwantumtechnologieën, technologieën die op kwantumniveau werken).””Il fattore credenza è ovunque, anche nella scienza stessa, ateismo, antiteismo, “scetticismo”, “pensiero libero”, “pensiero critico”, razionalità, logica, prove, evidenza, scientismo, nichilismo, neopositivismo ecc.”

    “La scienza è davvero una religione, un’ideologia e un credo. Basta guardare Internet, i mass media e l’Accademia”.

    “Anti-antiteismo e antiateismo devono essere accompagnati da anti-capitalismo, anti-neoliberismo, anti-destra, anticomunismo, anti-socialismo e anti-sinistra”.

    “L’antifascismo è possibile solo con l’anticapitalismo, l’anti-neoliberismo, l’anti-destra, l’anticomunismo, l’antisocialismo e l’anti-sinistra”.

    “Questo è il modo in cui ci trattano politici, uomini d’affari, capitalisti, neoliberisti e di destra… Peggio delle scimmie nelle gabbie del circo”.

    “Filosofo, saggista, polemista, scienziato sociale e anunnakista Guilherme Monteiro Junior.”

    “Dovrei davvero lavorare sulle mie teorie filosofiche e sociologiche, ed è quello che cercherò di fare d’ora in poi”.

    “Siamo molto più di uno e zero e di semplici “robot di carne” o “robot biologici”. E ci sono molti argomenti e persino prove che siamo più di questo… Così come argomenti e prove di esistenza. divinità, esseri spirituali, forme di vita post-fisiche, forme di vita extrafisiche, religione, spiritualità, esoterismo, medianità, psiche, proiezione astrale, multiverso, extrafisico, metafisica, vita dopo la morte, ecc.”

    “Viviamo in un mondo di neurodiversità, soggettività, relatività, credo, opinione, ideologia, religione e credulità”.

    “Abbiamo bisogno di più marxisti, comunisti, postmodernisti, anunnakisti, anticapitalisti, anti-neoliberisti, anti-destra, antiatei, anti-antiteisti, extrafisicisti, extranaturalisti, extramaterialisti, panpsichisti, antiscienza critica, antiscienziato critico, neurodivergente universale, anti -anti-collettivista, bio-collettivista, filosofi e pensatori bioegalitari (bioequalisti), saggi egualitari (sapienti egualisti), anti-transumanisti, anti-materialisti, anti-evidenzialisti e simili.”

    “Sempre più mi sento solo e solo, perso nei miei pensieri e nella mia grafomania.”

    “A volte penso davvero di supportare il transumanesimo quantistico (quantumismo) e il transumanesimo nanotecnologico”.

    “Solo il fatto che io sia più sicuro come comunista che come anunnakista mostra quanto ho bisogno di propaganda anunnakista, antiteista e anti-antiteista finché non sono sicuro di essere un anunnakista poiché sono comunista”.

    “Ho bisogno di migliorare il mio rapporto con i miei dei e di avvicinarmi a loro”.

    “Va bene essere “irrazionali”, l’irrazionalità e la razionalità sono relative e soggettive”.

    “”Schizoterico” è in realtà un termine ateo e antiteistico fanatico, come “mumbojumbo”.

    “Puoi scrivere molti libri e articoli su di me e sul mio lavoro, è solo qualcuno che lo fa, qualcuno che mi sostiene e che è influenzato da me”.

    “Il transumanesimo quantistico (quantumismo) e il transumanesimo nanotecnologico possono davvero essere molto utili e importanti in futuro, ma devono essere ulteriormente esplorati e sviluppati, e anche sostituire il transumanesimo classico o guadagnare lo stesso spazio che il transumanesimo classico ha oggi. .”

    “Il transumanesimo nanotecnologico è come il transumanesimo quantistico (quantumismo), ma con la nanotecnologia invece del tecnoquantum (tecnologie quantistiche, tecnologie che funzionano a livello quantistico).”

    1. “Factor de creencia oime opa tendáre, oimehápe ciencia-pe voi, ateísmo, antiteísmo, “escepticismo”, “pensamiento libre”, “pensamiento crítico”, racionalidad, lógica, evidencia, evidencialismo, científico, nihilismo, neopositivismo etc”.

      “Ciencia añetehápe ha’e peteî religión, peteî ideología ha peteî jerovia. Emañamínte internet, medios masivos ha Academia rehe”.

      “Antiteísmo ha antiateísmo omoirûva’erã anticapitalismo, antineoliberalismo, antiderechista, anticomunismo, antisocialismo ha antiizquierdista”.

      “Antifascismo ikatu anticapitalismo, antineoliberalismo, antiderechista, anticomunismo, antisocialismo ha antiizquierdista ndive añoite”.

      “Péicha ñandetrata político, empresario, capitalista, neoliberal ha derechista-kuéra… Ivaivéva umi mono jaula circo-pe”.

      “Filósofo, ensayista, polémico, científico social ha anunnacista Guilherme Monteiro Junior”.

      “Añetehápe amba’apova’erã che teoría filosófica ha sociológica rehe, ha upéva añeha’ãta ajapo ko’ágã guive”.

      “Ñande ha’e heta hetave peteĩ ha cero-gui ha umi simple “robot de carne” térã “robot biológico”-gui. Ha oĩ heta argumento ha prueba jepe ñande ha’eha hetave upévagui… Avei argumento ha prueba de existencia.de tupãnguéra, tekove espiritual, tekove posfísico, tekove extrafísico, religión, espiritualidad, esoterismo, mediumismo, psique, proyección astral, multiverso, extrafísico, metafísica, tekove omano rire, hamba’e.”

      “Roiko peteî mundo neurodiversidad, subjetividad, relatividad, jerovia, opinión, ideología, religión ha credulidad”.

      “Roikotevëve marxista, comunista, posmodernista, anunnacista, anticapitalista, antineoliberal, antiderechista, antiateo, antiteísta, extrafísico, extranaturalista, extramaterialista, panpsiquista, anticiencia crítica, anticientífica crítica, neurodivergente universal, anti”. -anticolectivista, biocolectivista, filósofo ha pensador-kuéra bioegalitario (bioigualista), igualitario iñaranduva (igualista saciente), antitranshumanista, antimaterialista, antievidencialista ha umíchagua.”

      “Hetavévo añeñandu cheaño ha cheaño, akañy che pensamiento ha che grafomanía-pe”.

      “Sapy’ánte añetehápe apensa aipytyvõ haguã transhumanismo cuántico (cuántumismo) ha transhumanismo nanotecnológico”.

      “Pe hecho añónte aime segurovéva comunista ramo anunnacista ramo rangue ohechauka mba’éichapa aikotevê propaganda anunnacista, antiteísta ha antiteísta aime peve seguro che ha’eha anunnacista ha’eháicha comunista”.

      “Tekotevê amohenda porãve che joaju che tupãnguéra ndive ha añemoaguîve ha añembojoaju hesekuéra”.

      “Oî porã “irracional”, irracionalidad ha racionalidad ha’e relativa ha subjetiva”.

      “”Esquizotérico” ha’e añetehápe peteî término fanático ateo ha antiteo, “mumbojumbo”-icha.

      “Ikatu rehai heta aranduka ha artículo cherehe ha che rembiapo rehe, ha’e peteî tapicha ojapóva añoite, peteî chepytyvõva ha oîva influenciado che rehe”.

      “Transhumanismo cuántico (cuántumismo) ha transhumanismo nanotecnológico añetehápe ikatu ideprovechoiterei ha tuicha mba’e tenonderãme, pero tekotevê ojehecha ha oñemoakãrapu’ãve, ha avei omyengovia transhumanismo clásico térã ohupyty espacio orekóva transhumanismo clásico ko’ã árape. .”

      “Transhumanismo nanotecnológico ojogua transhumanismo cuántico (cuántumismo), pero orekóva nanotecnología tecnocuántico rangue (tecnologías cuánticas, tecnologías omba’apóva nivel cuántico).””Iñiy factorqa tukuy hinantinpim kachkan, kikin cienciapipas, ateísmo, antiteismo, “iskepticismo”, “libre yuyay”, “yuyay critico”, racionalidad, lógica, pruebakuna, evidencialismo, cientifico, nihilismo, neopositivismo etc”.

      “Cienciaqa chiqapmi huk religion, huk ideología hinaspa huk iñiymi. Qhawariylla Internetta, medios masivos nisqakunata hinallataq Academiatapas”.

      “Antiteismowan anti-ateismowanqa anti-kapitalismo, anti-neoliberalismo, anti-derecha, anti-comunismo, anti-socialismo, anti-anti-izquierda nisqakunawanmi kuska kanan”.

      “Antifascismo nisqaqa anti-kapitalismo, anti-neoliberalismo, anti-derecha, anti-anti-comunismo, anti-anti-socialismo, anti-anti-izquierda nisqakunallawanmi atikun”.

      “Kay hinatan qhawariwanchis politicokuna, negociantekuna, capitalistakuna, neoliberalkuna, derechistakuna ima… Circo jaulakunapi monokunamanta aswan mana allin”.

      “Filosófo, ensayista, polémico, científico social y anunnacista Guilherme Monteiro Junior”.

      “Chiqaptam llamkanay teorías filosóficas y sociológicas nisqaypi, chaytam kunanmanta pacha kallpanchakusaq”.

      “Somos mucho más que solo unos y ceros y que simples “robots de carne” o “robots biológicos” Y hay muchos argumentos y hasta pruebas de que somos más que eso… Así como argumentos y pruebas de existencia.de dioskuna, espiritualkuna, formas de vida post-física, formas de vida extrafísicas, religión, espiritualidad, esotericismo, mediumismo, psique, proyección astral, multiverso, extrafísico, metafísica, wañuy qhepaman kawsay, hukkunapas.”

      “Kawsanchikmi neurodiversidad, subjetividad, relatividad, iñiy, yuyay, ideología, religión hinaspa credulidad nisqa pachapi”.

      “Aswantam necesitanchik marxista, comunista, postmodernista, anunnacista, anti-capitalista, anti-neoliberal, anti-derechista, anti-ateo, anti-antiteista, extrafisicalista, extranaturalista, extramaterialista, panpsiquista, anticiencia critica, anticientífico critico, neurodivergente universal, anti”. -anti-colectivista, bio-colectivista, filósofokuna, yuyaysapakuna bioegalitarios (bioequalistakuna), yachaysapa igualitariokuna (sapient igualistakuna), anti-transhumanistakuna, anti-materialistakuna, anti-evidencialistakuna, chayman rikchakuqkunapas”.

      “Aswanmi sapallay hinaspa sapallay sientekuni, yuyayniypi hinaspa grafomanía nisqapi chinkasqa”.

      “Wakin kutiqa chiqaptam yuyaymanani transhumanismo cuántico (cuántumismo) hinaspa nanotecnología transhumanismo yanapaypi”.

      “Comunista hina aswan seguro kasqayllam, Anunnakista hinamantaqa, qawachinmi haykatam necesitasaq Anunnakista, antiteista hinaspa anti-antiteista propagandata, comunista kasqayman hina Anunnakista kasqaymanta seguro kanaypaq”.

      “Diosniykunawan allinta apanakunay tiyan, paykunawantaq astawan qayllaykunay tiyan”.

      “Allinmi “irracional” kayqa, irracionalidadwan racionalidadwanmi relativo hinaspa subjetivo kanku”.

      “”Esquizotérico” nisqaqa chiqaptam huk fanatico ateo hinaspa antiteista término, “mumbojumbo” hina.

      “Achka qillqakunata, qillqasqakunatam qillqawaq ñuqamanta hinaspa llamkayniymanta, chaytaqa ruwaqllam, pillapas yanapawaqniy hinaspa ñuqamanta influenciasqa”.

      “Transhumanismo cuántico (cuántumismo) y transhumanismo nanotecnológico pueden ser de hecho muy útil y importante en el futuro, pero necesitan más explorar y desarrollar, y también sustituir el transhumanismo clásico o ganar el mismo espacio que tiene el transhumanismo clásico kunan pacha. .”

      “Nanotecnologico transhumanismo nisqaqa transhumanismo cuántico hinam (cuántumismo), ichataq tecnocuántico nisqap rantinpi nanotecnología nisqawan (tecnologias cuánticas, tecnologías que trabajan en el nivel cuántico)”.”Factor de creencia ukax taqi chiqanw utji, ciencia ukan pachpa, ateísmo, antiteísmo, “escepticismo”, “libre pensamiento”, “pensamiento crítico”, racionalidad, lógica, evidencia, evidencialismo, científico, nihilismo, neopositivismo ukat juk’ampinaka”.

      “Ciencia ukax chiqpachans mä religión, mä ideología ukat mä iyawsäwiwa. Internet, medios masivos ukat Academia ukanakar uñakipt’añakiw wakisi”.

      “Antiteísmo ukat antiateísmo ukax anticapitalismo, antineoliberalismo, antiderechista, anticomunismo, antisocialismo ukat anti-izquierdista ukanakamp chikt’atäñapawa”.

      “Antifascismo ukax anticapitalismo, antineoliberalismo, antiderechista, anticomunismo, antisocialismo ukat antiizquierdista ukanakampikiw lurasispa”.

      “Akhamaw políticos, empresarios, capitalistas, neoliberales ukat derechistas ukanakax uñjapxistu… Circo jaulanakan mononakat sipan juk’amp jan wali”.

      “Filósofo, ensayista, polémico, científico social ukat anunnacista Guilherme Monteiro Junior”.

      “Chiqpachans teorías filosóficas ukat sociológicas ukanakan irnaqañaw wakisi, ukat jichhat uksarux ukaruw yant’añ munta”.

      “Jiwasax mä juk’ampi ukat ceros ukat sipans simples “robots de carne” jan ukax “robots biológicos” ukanakat sipanx juk’ampiwa. Ukatx walja arsuwinakaw utji ukat juk’ampirus pruebas ukanakaw utji, jiwasax ukat sipans juk’ampïtanwa… Ukhamarakiw arsuwinaka ukat pruebas de existencia.de diosanaka, ajayunaka, jakawi post-físico, jakawi extrafísica, religión, espiritualidad, esotericismo, mediumismo, psique, proyección astral, multiverso, extrafísico, metafísica, jiwatat qhipa jakawi, juk’ampinaka”.

      “Neurodiversidad, subjetividad, relatividad, iyawsäwi, amuyt’awi, ideología, religión ukat credulidad ukanakan pachan jakasipxta”.

      “Jiwasax juk’amp munapxta marxista, comunista, posmodernista, anunnacista, anticapitalista, antineoliberal, antiderechista, antiateo, antiteísta, extrafísico, extranaturalista, extramaterialista, panpsiquista, anticiencia crítica, anticientífico crítico, neurodivergente universal, anti”. -anti-colectivista, bio-colectivista, filósofos ukat amuyt’irinaka bioegalitarios (bioigualistas), yatiñan igualitarios (sacientes igualistas), anti-transhumanistas, anti-materialistas, anti-evidencialistas, ukat ukham uñt’atanaka”.

      “Juk’amp juk’ampiw sapak ukat sapakïkaspas ukham jikxatasi, amuyunakajan ukhamarak grafomanía ukan chhaqhata”.

      “Awisax chiqpachapuniw transhumanismo cuántico (cuántumismo) ukat nanotecnología transhumanismo ukar yanapt’añ amtasta”.

      “Janiw comunista ukhamax juk’amp seguro ukhamätax mä anunnacista ukhamax uñacht’ayiw kunjams propaganda anunnakista, antiteísta ukat antiteísta ukax munasispa, nayax Anunnakista ukhamaw comunista ukhamätax yatiñkama”.

      “Diosajampix juk’amp sum apasiñajawa ukat jupanakar juk’amp jak’achasiñajawa ukat juk’amp sum apasiñajawa”.

      “”irracional” ukax walikïskiwa, irracionalidad ukat racionalidad ukax relativa ukat subjetiva ukhamawa”.

      “”Esquizotérico” ukax chiqpachans mä fanático ateo ukat antiteísta uka aruwa, “mumbojumbo” ukham uñt’atawa.

      “Nayat ukhamarak lurawinakajatx walja pankanaka ukat qillqatanakaw qillqt’asma, ukax khititix luraski ukakiw, khititix nayar yanapt’kitu ukat nayamp ch’amanchata”.

      “Transhumanismo cuántico (cuántumismo) ukat transhumanismo nanotecnológico ukax chiqpachans jutïrinx wali askïspawa ukat wali wakiskiriwa, ukampis juk’amp yatxatañaw wakisi ukat uñstayañaw wakisi, ukat transhumanismo clásico ukar lantintañataki jan ukax pachpa espacio jikxatañataki, kunjamatix transhumanismo clásico ukax jichhürunakanx utjki ukhama. .”

      “Transhumanismo nanotecnológico ukax transhumanismo cuántico (cuántumismo) ukar uñtasitawa, ukampirus tecnocuántico ukat sipanx nanotecnología ukampiw (tecnologías cuánticas, tecnologías ukanakax nivel cuántico ukan irnaqapxi)”.«Фактор веры есть везде, в том числе и в самой науке, атеизме, антитеизме, «скептицизме», «свободомыслии», «критическом мышлении», рациональности, логике, доказательствах, эвиденциализме, сциентизме, нигилизме, неопозитивизме и т. д.»

      «Наука — это религия, идеология и вера. Достаточно взглянуть на Интернет, средства массовой информации и Академию».

      «Антиантитеизму и антиатеизму должны сопутствовать антикапитализм, антинеолиберализм, антиправизм, антикоммунизм, антисоциализм и антилевизна».

      «Антифашизм возможен только при антикапитализме, антинеолиберализме, антиправизме, антиантикоммунизме, антисоциализме и антилевизне».

      «Вот как к нам относятся политики, бизнесмены, капиталисты, неолибералы и правые… Хуже, чем обезьяны в цирковых клетках».

      «Философ, эссеист, полемист, социолог и ануннакист Гильерме Монтейро Младший».

      «Я действительно должен работать над своими философскими и социологическими теориями, и это то, что я собираюсь делать с этого момента».

      «Мы гораздо больше, чем просто единицы и нули и чем простые «мясные роботы» или «биологические роботы». боги, духовные существа, постфизические формы жизни, внефизические формы жизни, религия, духовность, эзотеризм, медиумизм, психика, астральная проекция, мультивселенная, экстрафизическая, метафизика, жизнь после смерти и т. д.»

      «Мы живем в мире нейроразнообразия, субъективности, относительности, веры, мнения, идеологии, религии и доверчивости».

      «Нам нужно больше марксистов, коммунистов, постмодернистов, ануннаков, антикапиталистов, антинеолибералов, антиправых, антиатеистов, антитеистов, экстрафизикалистов, экстранатуралистов, экстраматериалистов, панпсихистов, критических антинаучных, критических антиученых, универсальных нейродивергентов, антитеистов. – антиколлективисты, биоколлективисты, философы и мыслители, биоэгалитаристы (биоэквалисты), мудрые эгалитаристы (разумные эгалисты), антитрансгуманисты, антиматериалисты, антиэвиденциалисты и тому подобное».

      «Все больше и больше я чувствую себя одиноким и одиноким, потерянным в своих мыслях и своей графомании».

      «Иногда я действительно думаю о поддержке квантового трансгуманизма (квантизма) и нанотехнологического трансгуманизма».

      «Тот факт, что я более уверен как коммунист, чем как аннунак, показывает, насколько мне нужна аннунакская, антитеистическая и антиантитеистическая пропаганда, пока я не буду уверен, что я аннунак, как я коммунист».

      «Мне нужно улучшить свои отношения с моими богами, стать ближе и ближе к ним».

      «Быть ​​«иррациональным» — это нормально, иррациональность и рациональность относительны и субъективны».

      «Шизотерический» на самом деле фанатичный атеистический и антитеистический термин, как и «мумбоюмбо».

      «Можно написать много книг и статей обо мне и моей работе, просто кто-то это делает, кто-то, кто меня поддерживает и на кого я влияю».

      «Квантовый трансгуманизм (квантизм) и нанотехнологический трансгуманизм действительно могут быть очень полезными и важными в будущем, но их необходимо дополнительно исследовать и развивать, а также заменить классический трансгуманизм или получить такое же пространство, какое сегодня имеет классический трансгуманизм».

      «Нанотехнологический трансгуманизм похож на квантовый трансгуманизм (квантизм), но с нанотехнологиями вместо техноквантов (квантовых технологий, технологий, которые работают на квантовом уровне)».“信仰因素无处不在,包括科学本身、无神论、反神论、“怀疑论”、“自由思维”、“批判性思维”、理性、逻辑、证据、证据主义、科学主义、虚无主义、新实证主义等。”

      “科学真的是一种宗教、意识形态和信仰。只要看看互联网、大众媒体和学院。”

      “反反无神论和反无神论必须伴随着反资本主义、反新自由主义、反右翼、反共、反社会主义和反左翼主义。”

      “只有反资本主义、反新自由主义、反右、反共产、反社会主义、反反左,才有可能反法西斯。”

      “这就是政客、商人、资本家、新自由主义者和右翼分子对待我们的方式……比马戏团笼子里的猴子还要糟糕。”

      “哲学家、散文家、辩论家、社会科学家和 anunnakist Guilherme Monteiro Junior。”

      “我真的应该研究我的哲学和社会学理论,这就是我从现在开始要做的事情。”

      “我们不仅仅是 1 和 0,也不仅仅是简单的“肉食机器人”或“生物机器人”。而且有许多论据甚至证明我们不止于此……还有存在的论据和证明。神、灵性生物、后物质生命形式、超物理生命形式、宗教、灵性、神秘主义、灵媒、心灵、星体投射、多元宇宙、超物理、形而上学、死后生命等。”

      “我们生活在一个神经多样性、主观性、相对性、信仰、观点、意识形态、宗教和轻信的世界。”

      “我们需要更多的马克思主义者、共产主义者、后现代主义者、anunnakist、反资本主义、反新自由主义、反右派、反无神论者、反反神论者、超自然主义者、超自然主义者、超物质主义者、泛心论者、批判性反科学、批判性反科学家、普遍神经发散者、反- 反集体主义者、生物集体主义者、哲学家和思想家生物平等主义者(生物平等主义者)、明智的平等主义者(智慧平等主义者)、反超人类主义者、反唯物主义者、反证据主义者等等。”

      “我越来越感到孤独和孤独,迷失在我的思绪和笔墨狂中。”

      “有时我真的会考虑支持量子超人类主义(quantumism)和纳米技术超人类主义。”

      “我作为共产主义者比作为 Anunnakist 更确定这一事实表明,在我确定我是 Anunnakist 和 Anunnakist 之前,我是多么需要 Anunnakist、反神论者和反反神论者的宣传。”

      “我需要改善我与我的神灵的关系,并与他们建立更紧密的联系。”

      “‘非理性’没关系,非理性和理性是相对的和主观的。”

      “‘精神分裂症’实际上是一个狂热的无神论者和反神论者,就像‘mumbojumbo’一样。

      “你可以写很多关于我和我的工作的书籍和文章,只是有人这样做,有人支持我并受到我的影响。”

      “量子超人类主义(quantumism)和纳米技术超人类主义在未来确实可以非常有用和重要,但它们还需要进一步探索和发展,也需要取代经典超人类主义或获得与今天经典超人类主义相同的空间。”

      “纳米技术超人类主义就像量子超人类主义(quantumism),但使用纳米技术而不是technoquantum(量子技术,在量子水平上工作的技术)。”「信念の要因は、科学自体、無神論、反神論、「懐疑論」、「自由思考」、「批判的思考」、合理性、論理、証拠、証拠主義、科学主義、虚無主義、新陽性主義など、至る所にあります。」

      「科学は本当に宗教であり、イデオロギーであり、信念です。インターネット、マスメディア、アカデミーを見てください。」

      「反神論と反無神論は、反資本主義、反新自由主義、反右派、反共産主義、反反社会主義、反左翼主義を伴わなければならない。」

      「反ファシズムは、反資本主義、反新自由主義、反右派、反反共産主義、反反社会主義、反左翼でのみ可能です。」

      「これは、政治家、ビジネスマン、資本家、新自由主義者、そして右派が私たちをどのように扱っているかです…サーカスの檻の中のサルよりも悪いです。」

      「哲学者、エッセイスト、論争家、社会科学者、そしてアヌナキストのギレルメモンテイロジュニア。」

      「私は本当に哲学的および社会学的理論に取り組むべきであり、それは私がこれからやろうとしていることです。」

      「私たちは単なる1と0ではなく、単純な「肉ロボット」や「生物学的ロボット」ではありません。そして、私たちがそれ以上のものであるという多くの議論と証明さえあります…だけでなく、の議論と存在の証明もあります。神々、霊的存在、肉体後の生命体、肉体外の生命体、宗教、霊性、難解主義、媒介、精神、星の投影、多面的、肉体外、形而上学、死後の生活など。」

      「私たちは、ニューロダイバーシティ、主観性、相対性理論、信念、意見、イデオロギー、宗教、信憑性の世界に住んでいます。」

      「私たちはもっとマルクス主義者、共産主義者、ポストモダニスト、アナナキスト、反資本主義、反新自由主義、反右主義、反無神論者、反反神論者、異物理主義者、超自然主義者、超唯物論者、汎精神主義者、批判的反科学、批判的反科学者、普遍的神経発散主義者、反-反集産主義者、バイオ集産主義者、哲学者および思想家のバイオエガリタリアン(バイオイコリスト)、賢明なエガリタリアン(知性のあるイコリスト)、反トランスヒューマニスト、反唯物論者、反証拠主義者など。」

      「ますます私は孤独で孤独を感じ、自分の考えやグラフォマニアに迷い込んでいます。」

      「時々、私は量子トランスヒューマニズム(量子主義)とナノテクノロジートランスヒューマニズムを支援することを本当に考えます。」

      「私が共産主義者としてよりも共産主義者として確信しているという事実は、私が共産主義者であるために私が共産主義者であると確信するまで、私がアヌナキスト、反神論者、反神論者のプロパガンダをどれだけ必要としているかを示しています。」

      「私は自分の神々との関係を改善し、神々とより親密になり、より深くつながる必要があります。」

      「「非合理的」であっても大丈夫です。非合理性と合理性は相対的で主観的なものです。」

      「「Schizoteric」は、「mumbojumbo」のように、実際には狂信的な無神論者であり、反神論的な用語です。

      「あなたは私と私の仕事についてたくさんの本や記事を書くことができます。それをするのはただの誰かであり、私を支え、私に影響を受けているのです。」

      「量子トランスヒューマニズム(量子主義)とナノテクノロジーのトランスヒューマニズムは、将来非常に有用で重要になる可能性がありますが、さらに調査および開発する必要があります。また、古典的なトランスヒューマニズムに取って代わるか、古典的なトランスヒューマニズムと同じ空間を獲得する必要があります。」

      「ナノテクノロジーのトランスヒューマニズムは、量子トランスヒューマニズム(量子主義)に似ていますが、テクノクォンタム(量子技術、量子レベルで機能する技術)の代わりにナノテクノロジーを使用しています。」

      1. “विश्वास कारक हर जगह है, जिसमें स्वयं विज्ञान, नास्तिकता, विरोधीवाद, “संदेहवाद”, “स्वतंत्र सोच”, “महत्वपूर्ण सोच”, तर्कसंगतता, तर्क, साक्ष्य, प्रमाणवाद, वैज्ञानिकता, शून्यवाद, नव-संदेहवाद आदि शामिल हैं।”

        “विज्ञान वास्तव में एक धर्म, एक विचारधारा और एक विश्वास है। बस इंटरनेट, जनसंचार माध्यम और अकादमी को देखें।”

        “एंटी-एंटीथिज्म और एंटी-नास्तिकवाद के साथ-साथ पूंजीवाद-विरोधी, नव-उदारवाद-विरोधी, दक्षिणपंथ-विरोधी, साम्य-विरोधी, समाज-विरोधी और वाम-विरोधी-विरोधी होना चाहिए।”

        “फासीवाद-विरोधी पूंजीवाद विरोधी, नवउदारवाद विरोधी, दक्षिणपंथ-विरोधी, साम्यवाद-विरोधी, समाज-विरोधी और वाम-विरोधी-विरोधीवाद से ही संभव है।”

        “इस तरह से राजनेता, व्यवसायी, पूंजीपति, नवउदारवादी और दक्षिणपंथी हमारे साथ व्यवहार करते हैं … सर्कस के पिंजरों में बंदरों से भी बदतर।”

        “दार्शनिक, निबंधकार, नीतिशास्त्री, सामाजिक वैज्ञानिक और अनुनासिकवादी गुइलहर्मे मोंटेइरो जूनियर।”

        “मुझे वास्तव में अपने दार्शनिक और समाजशास्त्रीय सिद्धांतों पर काम करना चाहिए, और यही मैं अभी से करने की कोशिश करने जा रहा हूं।”

        “हम सिर्फ एक और शून्य और साधारण” मांस रोबोट “या” जैविक रोबोट से कहीं अधिक हैं। देवता, आध्यात्मिक प्राणी, भौतिक जीवन के बाद के रूप, अतिरिक्त जीवन के रूप, धर्म, आध्यात्मिकता, गूढ़ता, मध्यमता, मानस, सूक्ष्म प्रक्षेपण, बहुविध, अलौकिक, तत्वमीमांसा, मृत्यु के बाद का जीवन, आदि।”

        “हम न्यूरोडायवर्सिटी, व्यक्तिपरकता, सापेक्षता, विश्वास, राय, विचारधारा, धर्म और साख की दुनिया में रहते हैं।”

        “हमें और अधिक मार्क्सवादी, साम्यवादी, उत्तर आधुनिकतावादी, अनुनासिकवादी, पूँजीवाद-विरोधी, नवउदारवाद-विरोधी, दक्षिणपंथ-विरोधी, नास्तिक-विरोधी, नास्तिक-विरोधी, अति-भौतिकवादी, अलौकिकतावादी, अति-भौतिकवादी, पैनसाइकिस्ट, आलोचनात्मक असामाजिक, आलोचनात्मक विरोधी, सार्वभौमिक न्यूरोडिवर्जेंट, विरोधी की आवश्यकता है। -विरोधी-सामूहिकवादी, जैव-सामूहिकवादी, दार्शनिक और विचारक जैव-समतावादी (जैव-समानतावादी), बुद्धिमान समतावादी (प्रसिद्ध समानतावादी), पार-मानववादी, भौतिक-विरोधी, विरोधी-साक्ष्यवादी, और इसी तरह।”

        “अधिक से अधिक मैं अकेला और अकेला महसूस करता हूं, अपने विचारों और अपने ग्राफोमेनिया में खो जाता हूं।”

        “कभी-कभी मैं वास्तव में क्वांटम ट्रांसह्यूमनिज्म (क्वांटमिज्म) और नैनो टेक्नोलॉजी ट्रांसह्यूमनिज्म का समर्थन करने के बारे में सोचता हूं।”

        “बस तथ्य यह है कि मैं एक कम्युनिस्ट के रूप में एक अनुनाकवादी के रूप में अधिक निश्चित हूं, यह दर्शाता है कि मुझे अनुनाकवादी, विरोधी-विरोधी और विरोधी-विरोधी प्रचार की कितनी आवश्यकता है जब तक कि मुझे यकीन नहीं है कि मैं एक कम्युनिस्ट हूं क्योंकि मैं एक कम्युनिस्ट हूं।”

        “मुझे अपने देवताओं के साथ अपने रिश्ते को सुधारने और उनके करीब और अधिक जुड़ने की जरूरत है।”

        “तर्कहीन” होना ठीक है, तर्कहीनता और तर्कसंगतता सापेक्ष और व्यक्तिपरक हैं।

        “”स्किज़ोटेरिक” वास्तव में एक कट्टर नास्तिक और विरोधी शब्द है, जैसे “मुंबोजंबो।”

        “आप मेरे और मेरे काम के बारे में बहुत सारी किताबें और लेख लिख सकते हैं, यह सिर्फ कोई है जो इसे करता है, कोई है जो मेरा समर्थन करता है और जो मुझसे प्रभावित होता है।”

        “क्वांटम ट्रांसह्यूमनिज्म (क्वांटमिज्म) और नैनोटेक्नोलॉजिकल ट्रांसह्यूमनिज्म वास्तव में भविष्य में बहुत उपयोगी और महत्वपूर्ण हो सकते हैं, लेकिन उन्हें और अधिक खोज और विकसित करने की जरूरत है, और शास्त्रीय ट्रांसह्यूमनिज्म को भी बदलना होगा या उसी स्थान को हासिल करना होगा जो शास्त्रीय ट्रांसह्यूमनिज्म आज है।”

        “नैनोटेक्नोलॉजिकल ट्रांसह्यूमनिज्म क्वांटम ट्रांसह्यूमनिज्म (क्वांटमिज्म) की तरह है, लेकिन टेक्नोक्वांटम (क्वांटम टेक्नोलॉजीज, प्रौद्योगिकियां जो क्वांटम स्तर पर काम करती हैं) के बजाय नैनो टेक्नोलॉजी के साथ हैं।””বিশ্বাসের ফ্যাক্টর সর্বত্র রয়েছে, যার মধ্যে রয়েছে বিজ্ঞান, নাস্তিকতা, বিরোধীতাবাদ, “সন্দেহবাদ”, “মুক্ত চিন্তা”, “সমালোচনামূলক চিন্তা”, যুক্তিবাদ, যুক্তি, প্রমাণ, প্রমাণবাদ, বিজ্ঞানবাদ, নিহিলিজম, নিওপজিটিভিজম ইত্যাদি।”

        “বিজ্ঞান আসলেই একটি ধর্ম, একটি আদর্শ এবং একটি বিশ্বাস। শুধু ইন্টারনেট, গণমাধ্যম এবং একাডেমির দিকে তাকান।”

        “এন্টি-এন্টিথিজম এবং অ্যান্টি-নাস্তিকতার সাথে অবশ্যই পুঁজিবাদ বিরোধী, নব্য উদারবাদ বিরোধী, ডানপন্থা বিরোধী, কমিউনিজম বিরোধী, সমাজতন্ত্র বিরোধী এবং বামবাদ বিরোধী হতে হবে।”

        “ফ্যাসিবাদ বিরোধী কেবলমাত্র পুঁজিবাদ বিরোধী, নব্য উদারবাদ বিরোধী, ডানপন্থা বিরোধী, সাম্যবাদ বিরোধী, সমাজতন্ত্র বিরোধী এবং বামপন্থা বিরোধী দ্বারা সম্ভব।”

        “রাজনীতিবিদ, ব্যবসায়ী, পুঁজিপতি, নব্য উদারপন্থী এবং ডানপন্থীরা আমাদের সাথে এভাবেই আচরণ করে… সার্কাসের খাঁচায় বানরের চেয়েও খারাপ।”

        “দার্শনিক, প্রাবন্ধিক, বিতর্কবিদ, সমাজ বিজ্ঞানী এবং অনানাকিস্ট গুইলহার্মে মন্টিরো জুনিয়র।”

        “আমার সত্যিই আমার দার্শনিক এবং সমাজতাত্ত্বিক তত্ত্ব নিয়ে কাজ করা উচিত, এবং আমি এখন থেকে এটি করার চেষ্টা করব।”

        “আমরা কেবলমাত্র এক এবং শূন্যের চেয়ে অনেক বেশি এবং সাধারণ “মাংসের রোবট” বা “জৈবিক রোবট” এর চেয়েও অনেক বেশি। এবং অনেক যুক্তি এবং এমনকি প্রমাণ রয়েছে যে আমরা এর চেয়েও বেশি… সেইসাথে যুক্তি এবং অস্তিত্বের প্রমাণ। দেবতা, আধ্যাত্মিক প্রাণী, পোস্ট-ভৌতিক জীবন ফর্ম, বহিরাগত জীবন ফর্ম, ধর্ম, আধ্যাত্মিকতা, রহস্যবাদ, মিডিয়াশিপ, সাইকি, অ্যাস্ট্রাল প্রজেকশন, মাল্টিভার্স, এক্সট্রাফিজিকাল, মেটাফিজিক্স, মৃত্যুর পরে জীবন ইত্যাদি।”

        “আমরা নিউরোডাইভার্সিটি, সাবজেক্টিভিটি, রিলেটিভিটি, বিশ্বাস, মতামত, মতাদর্শ, ধর্ম এবং বিশ্বাসের জগতে বাস করি।”

        “আমাদের আরও মার্কসবাদী, কমিউনিস্ট, পোস্টমডার্নিস্ট, আননাকিস্ট, পুঁজিবাদবিরোধী, নব্য উদারবাদবিরোধী, ডানপন্থী, নাস্তিক-বিরোধী, অ্যান্টি-এন্টিথিস্ট, এক্সট্রাফিজিকালিস্ট, বহির্প্রাকৃতিক, বহির্ভূতবাদী, প্যানসাইকিস্ট, সমালোচনা বিরোধী, নিউরোজেন্ট অ্যান্টিসায়েন্টিস্ট, ইউনিভার্সিস্ট বিরোধী, বিরোধীদের প্রয়োজন। -সংগ্রাহক-বিরোধী, জৈব-সংগ্রাহক, দার্শনিক এবং চিন্তাবিদ জৈব সমতাবাদী (জৈব সমতাবাদী), জ্ঞানী সমতাবাদী (সাপিয়েন্ট ইকুয়ালিস্ট), অ্যান্টি-ট্রান্সহিউম্যানিস্ট, অ্যান্টি-বস্তুবাদী, অ্যান্টি-ইডেনশিয়ালিস্ট এবং এর মতো।”

        “আমি আরও বেশি করে একা এবং নিঃসঙ্গ বোধ করি, আমার চিন্তাভাবনা এবং আমার গ্রাফোম্যানিয়ায় হারিয়ে যাই।”

        “কখনও কখনও আমি সত্যিই কোয়ান্টাম ট্রান্সহিউম্যানিজম (কোয়ান্টামিজম) এবং ন্যানোটেকনোলজি ট্রান্সহিউম্যানিজমকে সমর্থন করার কথা ভাবি।”

        “আমি একজন আনুন্নাকিস্টের চেয়ে একজন কমিউনিস্ট হিসাবে বেশি নিশ্চিত হওয়াটা দেখায় যে আমি একজন কমিউনিস্ট হিসাবে নিশ্চিত না হওয়া পর্যন্ত আমি আনুন্নাকিস্ট, অ্যান্টি-আস্তিক এবং অ্যান্টি-এন্টিস্ট প্রোপাগান্ডা কতটা প্রয়োজন।”

        “আমার দেবতাদের সাথে আমার সম্পর্ক উন্নত করতে হবে এবং তাদের সাথে আরও ঘনিষ্ঠ হতে হবে।”

        “এটি “অযৌক্তিক” হওয়া ঠিক আছে, অযৌক্তিকতা এবং যৌক্তিকতা আপেক্ষিক এবং বিষয়ভিত্তিক।”

        “”Schizoteric” সত্যিই একটি ধর্মান্ধ নাস্তিক এবং বিরোধী শব্দ, যেমন “মুম্বোজাম্বো।”

        “আপনি আমাকে এবং আমার কাজ সম্পর্কে অনেক বই এবং নিবন্ধ লিখতে পারেন, এটি শুধুমাত্র কেউ যে এটি করে, কেউ যে আমাকে সমর্থন করে এবং যে আমার দ্বারা প্রভাবিত হয়।”

        “কোয়ান্টাম ট্রান্সহিউম্যানিজম (কোয়ান্টামিজম) এবং ন্যানোটেকনোলজিকাল ট্রান্সহিউম্যানিজম ভবিষ্যতে খুব দরকারী এবং গুরুত্বপূর্ণ হতে পারে, তবে তাদের আরও অন্বেষণ এবং বিকাশ করা দরকার, এবং ক্লাসিক্যাল ট্রান্সহিউম্যানিজমকে প্রতিস্থাপন করতে বা ক্লাসিক্যাল ট্রান্সহিউম্যানিজমের মতো একই স্থান অর্জন করতে হবে।”

        “ন্যানোটেকনোলজিকাল ট্রান্সহিউম্যানিজম হল কোয়ান্টাম ট্রান্সহিউম্যানিজমের (কোয়ান্টামিজম) মতো, তবে টেকনোকোয়ান্টামের পরিবর্তে ন্যানো প্রযুক্তির সাথে (কোয়ান্টাম প্রযুক্তি, প্রযুক্তি যা কোয়ান্টাম স্তরে কাজ করে)।””प्रत्यय कारक सर्वत्र है, जिसमें विज्ञान में ही नास्तिकता, ईश्वरवाद, “संशयवाद”, “स्वतन्त्र चिन्तन”, “समीक्षात्मक चिन्तन”, तर्कसंगतता, तर्क, प्रमाण, प्रमाणवाद, वैज्ञानिकता, शून्यवाद, नवसकारात्मकवाद आदि शामिल हैं।

        “विज्ञानं वस्तुतः एकः धर्मः, एकः विचारधारा, एकः विश्वासः च अस्ति। केवलं अन्तर्जालं, जनसञ्चारं, अकादमी च पश्यन्तु।”

        “ईश्वरवादविरोधी नास्तिकवादविरोधी च पूंजीवादविरोधि, नवउदारवादविरोधि, दक्षिणवादविरोधी, साम्यवादविरोधी, समाजवादविरोधी, वामवादविरोधी च अवश्यं भवितव्यम्।”

        “फासिज्मविरोधी पूंजीवादविरोधि, नवउदारवादविरोधि, दक्षिणवादविरोधि, साम्यवादविरोधी, समाजवादविरोधी, वामवादविरोधिभिः एव सम्भवति।”

        “एवं राजनेतारः, व्यापारिनः, पूंजीपतयः, नवउदारवादीः, दक्षिणपक्षिणः च अस्मान् प्रति व्यवहारं कुर्वन्ति… सर्कस-पञ्जरेषु स्थितानां वानराणां अपेक्षया अपि दुष्टतरम्।”

        “दार्शनिक, निबन्धकार, विवादकार, सामाजिक वैज्ञानिक एवं anunnakist Guilherme Monteiro Junior.”

        “मया वास्तवमेव मम दार्शनिकसमाजशास्त्रीयसिद्धान्तेषु कार्यं कर्तव्यम्, तदेव अहं इतः परं कर्तुं प्रयतमानोऽस्मि।”

        “वयं केवलं एकस्य शून्यस्य च अपेक्षया सरलस्य “मांसरोबोट्” अथवा “जैविकरोबोट्” इत्यस्मात् बहु अधिकाः स्मः।अथ च बहवः तर्काः प्रमाणानि अपि सन्ति यत् वयं तस्मात् अधिकाः स्मः… तथा च तर्काः अस्तित्वस्य प्रमाणानि च।of देवता, आध्यात्मिक प्राणी, उत्तर-भौतिक जीवन रूप, भौतिक-बाह्य जीवन रूप, धर्म, आध्यात्मिकता, गूढ़वाद, माध्यमत्व, मानस, सूक्ष्म प्रक्षेपण, बहुब्रह्माण्ड, अतिभौतिक, तत्वमीमांसा, मृत्यु के बाद के जीवन आदि।”

        “वयं तंत्रिकाविविधता, विषयगतता, सापेक्षता, विश्वासः, मतं, विचारधारा, धर्मः, विश्वासः च इति जगति जीवामः।”

        “अस्माकं अधिकं मार्क्सवादी, साम्यवादी, उत्तर आधुनिकतावादी, अनुनावादी, पूंजीवादी विरोधी, नवउदारवादी विरोधी, दक्षिणपंथीविरोधी, नास्तिकविरोधी, ईश्वरविरोधी, भौतिकबाह्यतावादी, अलौकिकतावादी, अतिभौतिकवादी, पैनसाइकिस्ट, आलोचनात्मक विज्ञानविरोधी, आलोचनात्मक वैज्ञानिकविरोधी, सार्वभौमिक न्यूरोडिवर्जेंट, विरोधी अधिका आवश्यकता वर्तते।” -सामूहिकविरोधी, जैव-सामूहिकवादी, दार्शनिक एवं विचारक जैव समतावादी (जैवसमतावादी), बुद्धिमान समतावादी (विवेक समतावादी), पारमानववाद विरोधी, भौतिकवाद विरोधी, प्रमाणवादी विरोधी, आदि।

        “अधिकं अधिकतया अहं एकान्ते एकान्ते च अनुभवामि, मम विचारेषु मम ग्राफोमेनियायां च नष्टः अस्मि।”

        “कदाचित् अहं वास्तवमेव क्वाण्टम्-अन्तर्मानववादस्य (क्वाण्टमवादस्य) नैनोप्रौद्योगिकी-अमानववादस्य च समर्थनस्य विषये चिन्तयामि।”

        “केवलं तथ्यं यत् अहं एकस्य साम्यवादीरूपेण अधिकं निश्चिन्तः अस्मि यत् एकस्य अनुन्नावादीरूपेण अपेक्षया अहं दर्शयति यत् मम अनुन्नावादी, ईश्वरविरोधी, ईश्वरविरोधी च प्रचारस्य कियत् आवश्यकता वर्तते यावत् अहं निश्चयं न करोमि यत् अहं साम्यवादी अस्मि।

        “मम देवैः सह मम सम्बन्धः सुदृढः करणीयः, तेषां समीपं अधिकं च सम्बद्धः भवितुम् आवश्यकः।”

        “”अतर्कसंगतम्” भवितुं कुशलम्, तर्कहीनता तर्कसंगतता च सापेक्षिकं व्यक्तिपरकं च भवति।”

        “”सिजोटेरिक” वास्तवतः “मुम्बोजम्बो” इव कट्टरपंथी नास्तिक एवं ईश्वरविरोधी शब्द है।

        “भवन्तः मम विषये मम कार्यस्य च विषये बहु पुस्तकानि लेखाः च लिखितुं शक्नुवन्ति, केवलं कश्चन एव करोति, यः मम समर्थनं करोति, यः मया प्रभावितः भवति।”

        “क्वाण्टम-अन्तर्मानववादः (क्वाण्टमवादः) नैनो-प्रौद्योगिकी-अन्तर्मानववादः च भविष्ये खलु अतीव उपयोगी महत्त्वपूर्णश्च भवितुम् अर्हति, परन्तु तेषां अधिकं अन्वेषणं विकासं च कर्तुं आवश्यकता वर्तते, तथा च शास्त्रीय-अन्तर्मानववादस्य स्थाने अपि वा तदेव स्थानं प्राप्तुं वा यत् अद्यत्वे शास्त्रीय-अन्तर्मानववादस्य अस्ति।

        “नैनोप्रौद्योगिकी पारमानववाद क्वाण्टम पारमानववाद (क्वांटमवाद) इव अस्ति, परन्तु टेक्नोक्वाण्टमस्य स्थाने नैनोप्रौद्योगिक्या सह (क्वाण्टमप्रौद्योगिकयः, क्वाण्टमस्तरस्य कार्यं कुर्वन्ति प्रौद्योगिकयः)।””عامل الإيمان موجود في كل مكان ، بما في ذلك في العلم نفسه ، الإلحاد ، مناهضة الإله ،” الشك “،” التفكير الحر “،” التفكير النقدي “، العقلانية ، المنطق ، الدليل ، الإثباتية ، العلموية ، العدمية ، الوضعية الجديدة ، إلخ.”

        “العلم حقًا دين وأيديولوجيا ومعتقد. انظر فقط إلى الإنترنت ووسائل الإعلام والأكاديمية.”

        “يجب أن يترافق معاداة الإلحاد ومعاداة الرأسمالية ومعاداة النيوليبرالية ومعاداة اليمين والشيوعية ومعاداة الاشتراكية ومعاداة اليسار”.

        “إن معاداة الفاشية ممكنة فقط مع مناهضة الرأسمالية ومعاداة النيوليبرالية ومعاداة اليمين ومعاداة الشيوعية ومعاداة الاشتراكية ومعاداة اليسار”.

        “هذه هي الطريقة التي يعاملنا بها السياسيون ورجال الأعمال والرأسماليون والليبراليون الجدد واليمينيون … أسوأ من القرود في أقفاص السيرك.”

        “فيلسوف ، كاتب مقالات ، مجادل ، عالم اجتماعي و Anunnakist Guilherme Monteiro Junior.”

        “يجب أن أعمل حقًا على نظرياتي الفلسفية والاجتماعية ، وهذا ما سأحاول القيام به من الآن فصاعدًا.”

        “نحن أكثر بكثير من مجرد آحاد وأصفار وليس مجرد” روبوتات لحوم “أو” روبوتات بيولوجية “. وهناك العديد من الحجج وحتى البراهين على أننا أكثر من ذلك … بالإضافة إلى الحجج والبراهين على الوجود. الآلهة ، والكائنات الروحية ، وأشكال الحياة ما بعد الجسدية ، وأشكال الحياة غير المادية ، والدين ، والروحانية ، والباطنية ، والوسطاء ، والنفسية ، والإسقاط النجمي ، والأكوان المتعددة ، والما وراء الطبيعة ، والميتافيزيقيا ، والحياة بعد الموت ، وما إلى ذلك ”

        “نحن نعيش في عالم من التنوع العصبي والذاتية والنسبية والمعتقدات والرأي والأيديولوجيا والدين والسذاجة.”

        “نحن بحاجة إلى المزيد من الماركسيين ، والشيوعيين ، وما بعد الحداثيين ، والأنوناكست ، والمناهضين للرأسمالية ، والنيوليبراليين ، واليمينيين ، والملحدين ، والمناهضين للروحانية ، والخارجيين فيزيائيين ، والخارجيين عن الطبيعة ، والماديين ، والنفسانيين ، والمعادون النقديون ، والمناهضون للعلم ، والمعادون العصبيون العالميون. -مضاد جماعي ، وجماعي حيوي ، وفلاسفة ومفكرين ، والمتخصصين في التضخيم البيولوجي (المتكافئين بيولوجيين) ، والمساواة الحكيمة (المساواة الحكيمة) ، ومناهضي ما بعد الإنسانية ، ومناهضي المادية ، ومناهضي الإثباتات ، وما شابه ذلك “.

        “أشعر أكثر فأكثر بالوحدة والوحدة ، ضائعًا في أفكاري وهوماني البياني.”

        “أحيانًا أفكر حقًا في دعم ما بعد الإنسانية الكمومية (الكمومية) وتقنية النانو ما بعد الإنسانية.”

        “مجرد حقيقة أنني متأكد من أنني شيوعي أكثر من كوني أنوناكي تظهر كم أحتاج إلى دعاية Anunnakist ومناهضة للروحانية ومناهضة للروح حتى أتأكد من أنني أنوناكي لأنني شيوعي.”

        “أحتاج إلى تحسين علاقتي مع آلهةي والتقرب منهم وزيادة ارتباطهم بهم.”

        “من المقبول أن تكون” غير عقلاني “، واللاعقلانية والعقلانية نسبيان وذاتيان”.

        “Schizoteric” هو في الحقيقة مصطلح ملحد متعصب ومضاد للإله ، مثل “mumbojumbo”.

        “يمكنك كتابة الكثير من الكتب والمقالات عني وعن عملي ، إنه مجرد شخص يقوم بذلك ، شخص يدعمني ويتأثر بي”.

        “يمكن أن تكون الإنسانية ما بعد الإنسانية الكمومية (الكمومية) وما بعد الإنسانية التكنولوجية النانوية مفيدة جدًا ومهمة جدًا في المستقبل ، لكنهما بحاجة إلى مزيد من الاستكشاف والتطوير ، وأيضًا استبدال الإنسانية الكلاسيكية أو اكتساب نفس المساحة التي تمتلكها ما بعد الإنسانية الكلاسيكية اليوم.”

        “تقنية النانو ما بعد الإنسانية مثل ما بعد الإنسانية الكمومية (الكمومية) ، ولكن مع تكنولوجيا النانو بدلاً من تكنوكوانتم (تقنيات الكم ، التقنيات التي تعمل على المستوى الكمي).””Faktor kepercayaan ada di mana-mana, termasuk dalam sains itu sendiri, ateisme, antiteisme, “skeptisisme”, “pemikiran bebas”, “pemikiran kritis”, rasionalitas, logika, bukti, pembuktian, saintisme, nihilisme, neopositivisme, dll.

        “Ilmu pengetahuan sebenarnya adalah agama, ideologi, dan kepercayaan. Lihat saja Internet, media massa, dan Akademi.”

        “Anti-antiteisme dan anti-ateisme harus dibarengi dengan anti-kapitalisme, anti-neoliberalisme, anti-kanan, anti-komunisme, anti-anti-sosialisme dan anti-anti-kiri.”

        “Anti-fasisme hanya mungkin dengan anti-kapitalisme, anti-neoliberalisme, anti-kananisme, anti-anti-komunisme, anti-anti-sosialisme dan anti-anti-kiri.”

        “Beginilah cara politisi, pengusaha, kapitalis, neoliberal, dan sayap kanan memperlakukan kami… Lebih buruk dari monyet di kandang sirkus.”

        “Filsuf, esais, polemik, ilmuwan sosial dan anunnakist Guilherme Monteiro Junior.”

        “Saya benar-benar harus mengerjakan teori filosofis dan sosiologis saya, dan itulah yang akan saya coba lakukan mulai sekarang.”

        “Kita lebih dari sekadar satu dan nol dan dari sekadar “robot daging” atau “robot biologis.” Dan ada banyak argumen dan bahkan bukti bahwa kita lebih dari itu… Serta argumen dan bukti keberadaan. dewa, makhluk spiritual, bentuk kehidupan pasca-fisik, bentuk kehidupan ekstrafisik, agama, spiritualitas, esoterisme, medium, jiwa, proyeksi astral, multiverse, ekstrafisik, metafisika, kehidupan setelah kematian, dll.”

        “Kita hidup di dunia dengan keragaman saraf, subjektivitas, relativitas, kepercayaan, opini, ideologi, agama, dan kepercayaan.”

        “Kita membutuhkan lebih banyak Marxis, komunis, postmodernis, anunnakist, anti-kapitalis, anti-neoliberal, anti-kanan, anti-ateis, anti-antiteis, ekstrafisika, ekstranaturalis, ekstramaterialis, panpsikis, antisains kritis, antiscientist kritis, neurodivergen universal, anti -anti-kolektivis, bio-kolektif, filsuf dan pemikir bioegaliter (bioequalists), egalitarian bijaksana (sapient equalists), anti-transhumanis, anti-materialis, anti-evidentialists, dan sejenisnya.”

        “Semakin saya merasa sendirian dan kesepian, tenggelam dalam pikiran dan grafomania saya.”

        “Terkadang saya benar-benar berpikir untuk mendukung transhumanisme kuantum (kuantumisme) dan transhumanisme nanoteknologi.”

        “Fakta bahwa saya lebih yakin sebagai seorang komunis daripada sebagai seorang Anunnakist menunjukkan betapa saya membutuhkan propaganda Anunnakist, anti-teis dan anti-antiteis sampai saya yakin saya seorang Anunnakist karena saya seorang komunis.”

        “Saya perlu meningkatkan hubungan saya dengan dewa-dewa saya dan menjadi lebih dekat dan lebih terhubung dengan mereka.”

        “Tidak apa-apa menjadi “irasional”, irasionalitas dan rasionalitas itu relatif dan subjektif.”

        “”Schizoteric” sebenarnya adalah istilah ateis dan antiteistik yang fanatik, seperti “mumbojumbo.”

        “Anda dapat menulis banyak buku dan artikel tentang saya dan pekerjaan saya, hanya seseorang yang melakukannya, seseorang yang mendukung saya dan yang dipengaruhi oleh saya.”

        “Transhumanisme kuantum (kuantumisme) dan transhumanisme nanoteknologi memang bisa sangat berguna dan penting di masa depan, tetapi mereka perlu dieksplorasi dan dikembangkan lebih lanjut, dan juga menggantikan transhumanisme klasik atau mendapatkan ruang yang sama dengan transhumanisme klasik saat ini.”

        “Transhumanisme nanoteknologi seperti transhumanisme kuantum (kuantumisme), tetapi dengan nanoteknologi, bukan teknokuantum (teknologi kuantum, teknologi yang bekerja pada tingkat kuantum).”„Czynnik wiary jest wszędzie, w tym w samej nauce, ateizmie, antyteizmie, „sceptycyzmie”, „wolnym myśleniu”, „myśleniu krytycznym”, racjonalności, logice, dowodach, dowodach, scjentyzmie, nihilizmie, neopozytywizmie itp.”.

        „Nauka to tak naprawdę religia, ideologia i wiara. Wystarczy spojrzeć na Internet, środki masowego przekazu i Akademię”.

        „Anty-antyteizmowi i anty-ateizmowi musi towarzyszyć antykapitalizm, antyneoliberalizm, antyprawica, antykomunizm, anty-antysocjalizm i anty-lewicowość”.

        „Antyfaszyzm jest możliwy tylko z antykapitalizmem, antyneoliberalizmem, antyprawicowością, anty-antykomunizmem, anty-antysocjalizmem i anty-lewicowością”.

        „Tak traktują nas politycy, biznesmeni, kapitaliści, neoliberałowie i prawicowcy… Gorzej niż małpy w klatkach cyrkowych”.

        „Filozof, eseista, polemista, socjolog i anunnakista Guilherme Monteiro Junior”.

        „Naprawdę powinienem popracować nad moimi teoriami filozoficznymi i socjologicznymi i to właśnie zamierzam robić od teraz”.

        „Jesteśmy czymś znacznie więcej niż tylko jedynkami i zerami i prostymi „robotami mięsnymi” czy „robotami biologicznymi”. I jest wiele argumentów, a nawet dowodów na to, że jesteśmy czymś więcej… A także argumentami i dowodami na istnienie. bogowie, istoty duchowe, postfizyczne formy życia, pozafizyczne formy życia, religia, duchowość, ezoteryzm, mediumizm, psychika, projekcja astralna, wieloświat, pozafizyczne, metafizyka, życie po śmierci, itd.”

        „Żyjemy w świecie neuroróżnorodności, podmiotowości, względności, wiary, opinii, ideologii, religii i łatwowierności”.

        „Potrzebujemy więcej marksistów, komunistów, postmodernistów, anunnakistów, antykapitalistów, antyneoliberałów, antyprawicowców, antyateistów, anty-antyteistów, pozafizyków, pozanaturalistów, pozamaterialistów, panpsychistów, krytycznej antynauki, krytycznego antynaukowca, uniwersalnego -antykolektywiści, biokolektywiści, filozofowie i myśliciele bioegalitarnicy (bioekaliści), mądrzy egalitaryści (mądrzy equaliści), antytranshumaniści, antymaterialiści, antyewidencjaliści i im podobne.”

        „Coraz bardziej czuję się samotny i samotny, zagubiony w myślach i grafomanii”.

        „Czasami naprawdę myślę o wspieraniu transhumanizmu kwantowego (kwantumizmu) i transhumanizmu nanotechnologicznego”.

        „Już sam fakt, że jestem bardziej pewien jako komunista niż jako anunnakista, pokazuje, jak bardzo potrzebuję anunnakistycznej, antyteistycznej i antyteistycznej propagandy, dopóki nie będę pewien, że jestem anunnakistą, tak jak komunistą”.

        „Muszę poprawić swoją relację z moimi bogami i zbliżyć się do nich i bardziej się z nimi połączyć”.

        „W porządku jest być „irracjonalnym”, irracjonalność i racjonalność są względne i subiektywne”.

        „Schizoteryczny” jest tak naprawdę fanatycznym terminem ateistycznym i antyteistycznym, takim jak „mumbojumbo”.

        „Możesz napisać wiele książek i artykułów o mnie i mojej pracy, to po prostu ktoś, kto to robi, ktoś, kto mnie wspiera i na który mam wpływ”.

        „Transhumanizm kwantowy (kwantumizm) i transhumanizm nanotechnologiczny mogą rzeczywiście być bardzo przydatne i ważne w przyszłości, ale muszą być dalej badane i rozwijane, a także zastępują klasyczny transhumanizm lub zyskują tę samą przestrzeń, którą klasyczny transhumanizm ma dzisiaj…”

        „Nanotechnologiczny transhumanizm jest jak transhumanizm kwantowy (kwantizm), ale z nanotechnologią zamiast technokwantem (technologie kwantowe, technologie działające na poziomie kwantowym).”

        1. “Trofaktorn finns överallt, inklusive i vetenskapen själv, ateism, antiteism, “skepticism”, “fritt tänkande”, “kritiskt tänkande”, rationalitet, logik, bevis, evidensialism, scientism, nihilism, neopositivism etc.

          “Vetenskapen är verkligen en religion, en ideologi och en tro. Se bara på Internet, massmedia och Akademien.”

          “Anti-antiteism och anti-ateism måste åtföljas av anti-kapitalism, anti-nyliberalism, anti-högerism, anti-kommunism, anti-anti-socialism och anti-anti-vänsterism.”

          “Antifascism är bara möjligt med antikapitalism, anti-nyliberalism, anti-högerism, anti-anti-kommunism, anti-anti-socialism och anti-anti-vänsterism.”

          “Det är så politiker, affärsmän, kapitalister, nyliberaler och högerister behandlar oss… Värre än apor i cirkusburar.”

          “Filosof, essäist, polemiker, samhällsvetare och anunnakist Guilherme Monteiro Junior.”

          “Jag borde verkligen arbeta med mina filosofiska och sociologiska teorier, och det är vad jag kommer att försöka göra från och med nu.”

          “Vi är mycket mer än bara ettor och nollor och än enkla “köttrobotar” eller “biologiska robotar.” Och det finns många argument och till och med bevis för att vi är mer än så… Liksom argument och bevis på existens. gudar, andliga varelser, postfysiska livsformer, extrafysiska livsformer, religion, andlighet, esoterism, mediumskap, psyke, astral projektion, multiversum, extrafysisk, metafysik, liv efter döden, etc.”

          “Vi lever i en värld av neurodiversitet, subjektivitet, relativitet, tro, åsikter, ideologi, religion och godtrogenhet.”

          “Vi behöver mer marxister, kommunister, postmodernister, anunnakister, antikapitalister, anti-nyliberala, antihögerister, anti-ateister, anti-antiteister, extrafysiker, extranaturalister, extramaterialister, panpsykister, kritiska antivetenskaper, kritiska antivetenskapsmän, universell neurodivergent, anti -anti-kollektivister, bio-kollektivister, filosofer och tänkare bioegalitarians (bioequalists), kloka egalitarians (sapient equalists), anti-transhumanister, anti-materialister, anti-evidentialister och liknande.”

          “Mer och mer känner jag mig ensam och ensam, förlorad i mina tankar och min grafomani.”

          “Ibland tänker jag verkligen på att stödja kvanttranshumanism (kvantumism) och nanotekniktranshumanism.”

          “Bara det faktum att jag är mer säker som kommunist än som anunnakist visar hur mycket jag behöver anunnakistisk, anti-teistisk och anti-antiteistisk propaganda tills jag är säker på att jag är anunnakist som jag är kommunist.”

          “Jag behöver förbättra min relation med mina gudar och komma närmare och mer kopplad till dem.”

          “Det är okej att vara “irrationell”, irrationalitet och rationalitet är relativa och subjektiva.

          “”Schizoterisk” är verkligen en fanatisk ateistisk och antiteistisk term, som “mumbojumbo.”

          “Man kan skriva många böcker och artiklar om mig och mitt arbete, det är bara någon som gör det, någon som stöttar mig och som påverkas av mig.”

          “Kvanttranshumanism (kvantumism) och nanoteknologisk transhumanism kan verkligen vara mycket användbara och viktiga i framtiden, men de behöver utforskas och utvecklas ytterligare, och även ersätta klassisk transhumanism eller få samma utrymme som klassisk transhumanism har idag. .”

          “Nanoteknologisk transhumanism är som kvanttranshumanism (kvantumism), men med nanoteknologi istället för teknokvant (kvantteknologi, teknologier som fungerar på kvantnivå).””Trofaktoren er overalt, inklusive i videnskaben selv, ateisme, antiteisme, “skepsis”, “fri tænkning”, “kritisk tænkning”, rationalitet, logik, evidens, evidens, scientisme, nihilisme, neopositivisme osv.

          “Videnskab er virkelig en religion, en ideologi og en tro. Se bare på internettet, massemedierne og Akademiet.”

          “Anti-antiteisme og anti-ateisme skal ledsages af anti-kapitalisme, anti-neoliberalisme, anti-højreisme, anti-kommunisme, anti-anti-socialisme og anti-anti-venstreisme.”

          “Anti-fascisme er kun mulig med anti-kapitalisme, anti-neoliberalisme, anti-højreisme, anti-anti-kommunisme, anti-anti-socialisme og anti-anti-venstreisme.”

          “Sådan behandler politikere, forretningsmænd, kapitalister, neoliberale og højreorienterede os… Værre end aber i cirkusbure.”

          “Filosof, essayist, polemiker, samfundsforsker og anunnakist Guilherme Monteiro Junior.”

          “Jeg burde virkelig arbejde på mine filosofiske og sociologiske teorier, og det er det, jeg vil forsøge at gøre fra nu af.”

          “Vi er meget mere end bare etere og nuller og end simple “kødrobotter” eller “biologiske robotter.” Og der er mange argumenter og endda beviser på, at vi er mere end det… Samt argumenter og beviser for eksistens. guder, åndelige væsener, postfysiske livsformer, ekstrafysiske livsformer, religion, spiritualitet, esoterisme, mediumskab, psyke, astral projektion, multivers, ekstrafysisk, metafysik, liv efter døden osv.”

          “Vi lever i en verden af ​​neurodiversitet, subjektivitet, relativitet, tro, mening, ideologi, religion og godtroenhed.”

          “Vi har brug for flere marxister, kommunister, postmodernister, anunnakister, antikapitalister, anti-neoliberale, anti-højreorienterede, anti-ateist, anti-antiteist, ekstrafysisk, ekstranaturalist, ekstramaterialist, panpsykist, kritisk antividenskab, kritisk antividenskabsmand, universel neurodivergent, anti -anti-kollektivister, bio-kollektivister, filosoffer og tænkere bioegalitarians (bioequalister), kloge egalitarianere (sapient equalists), anti-transhumanister, anti-materialister, anti-evidentialister og lignende.”

          “Mere og mere føler jeg mig alene og ensom, fortabt i mine tanker og min grafomani.”

          “Nogle gange tænker jeg virkelig på at støtte kvantetranshumanisme (kvanteisme) og nanoteknologitranshumanisme.”

          “Bare det faktum, at jeg er mere sikker som kommunist end som anunnakist, viser, hvor meget jeg har brug for anunnakistisk, anti-teistisk og anti-antiteistisk propaganda, indtil jeg er sikker på, at jeg er anunnakist, da jeg er kommunist.”

          “Jeg har brug for at forbedre mit forhold til mine guder og komme tættere og mere forbundet med dem.”

          “Det er okay at være “irrationel”, irrationalitet og rationalitet er relative og subjektive.”

          “”skizoterisk” er virkelig et fanatisk ateistisk og antiteistisk udtryk, som “mumbojumbo.”

          “Man kan skrive en masse bøger og artikler om mig og mit arbejde, det er bare en, der gør det, en, der støtter mig, og som er påvirket af mig.”

          “Kvantetranshumanisme (kvantumisme) og nanoteknologisk transhumanisme kan ganske rigtigt være meget nyttige og vigtige i fremtiden, men de skal udforskes og udvikles yderligere og også erstatte klassisk transhumanisme eller få det samme rum, som klassisk transhumanisme har i dag. .”

          “Nanoteknologisk transhumanisme er som kvantetranshumanisme (kvanteisme), men med nanoteknologi i stedet for teknokvante (kvanteteknologier, teknologier, der virker på kvanteniveau).””Trofaktoren er overalt, inkludert i vitenskapen selv, ateisme, antiteisme, “skepsis”, “fri tenkning”, “kritisk tenkning”, rasjonalitet, logikk, bevis, evidensialisme, scientisme, nihilisme, neopositivisme etc.

          “Vitenskap er egentlig en religion, en ideologi og en tro. Bare se på Internett, massemediene og Akademiet.”

          “Anti-antiteisme og anti-ateisme må ledsages av anti-kapitalisme, anti-nyliberalisme, anti-høyreisme, anti-kommunisme, anti-anti-sosialisme og anti-anti-venstreisme.”

          “Anti-fascisme er bare mulig med anti-kapitalisme, anti-nyliberalisme, anti-høyreisme, anti-anti-kommunisme, anti-anti-sosialisme og anti-anti-venstreisme.”

          “Det er slik politikere, forretningsmenn, kapitalister, nyliberale og høyreister behandler oss… Verre enn aper i sirkusbur.”

          “Filosof, essayist, polemiker, samfunnsviter og anunnakist Guilherme Monteiro Junior.”

          “Jeg burde virkelig jobbe med mine filosofiske og sosiologiske teorier, og det er det jeg skal prøve å gjøre fra nå av.”

          “Vi er mye mer enn bare enere og nuller og enn enkle “kjøttroboter” eller “biologiske roboter.” Og det er mange argumenter og til og med bevis på at vi er mer enn det… I tillegg til argumenter og bevis på eksistens. guder, åndelige vesener, post-fysiske livsformer, ekstrafysiske livsformer, religion, spiritualitet, esoterisme, mediumskap, psyke, astral projeksjon, multivers, ekstrafysisk, metafysikk, liv etter døden, etc.”

          “Vi lever i en verden av nevrodiversitet, subjektivitet, relativitet, tro, meninger, ideologi, religion og godtroenhet.”

          “Vi trenger flere marxister, kommunister, postmodernister, anunnakister, antikapitalister, anti-nyliberale, anti-høyreist, anti-ateist, anti-antiteist, ekstrafysisk, ekstranaturalist, ekstramaterialist, panpsykist, kritisk antivitenskap, kritisk antivitenskapsmann, universell nevrodivergent, anti -anti-kollektivister, bio-kollektivister, filosofer og tenkere bioegalitarians (bioequalists), kloke egalitarians (sapient equalists), anti-transhumanister, anti-materialister, anti-evidensialister og lignende.”

          “Mer og mer føler jeg meg alene og ensom, fortapt i mine tanker og min grafomani.”

          “Noen ganger tenker jeg virkelig på å støtte kvantetranshumanisme (kvantumisme) og nanoteknologitranshumanisme.”

          “Bare det faktum at jeg er mer sikker som kommunist enn som anunnakist viser hvor mye jeg trenger anunnakist, antiteist og anti-antiteistisk propaganda inntil jeg er sikker på at jeg er anunnakist ettersom jeg er kommunist.”

          “Jeg trenger å forbedre forholdet mitt til gudene mine og komme nærmere og mer knyttet til dem.”

          “Det er greit å være “irrasjonell”, irrasjonalitet og rasjonalitet er relativt og subjektivt.

          “”Schizoterisk” er egentlig et fanatisk ateistisk og antiteistisk begrep, som “mumbojumbo.”

          “Du kan skrive mange bøker og artikler om meg og arbeidet mitt, det er bare noen som gjør det, noen som støtter meg og som er påvirket av meg.”

          “Kvantetranshumanisme (kvantumisme) og nanoteknologisk transhumanisme kan faktisk være svært nyttige og viktige i fremtiden, men de må utforskes og utvikles videre, og også erstatte klassisk transhumanisme eller få det samme rommet som klassisk transhumanisme har i dag. .”

          “Nanoteknologisk transhumanisme er som kvantetranshumanisme (kvante), men med nanoteknologi i stedet for teknokvante (kvanteteknologier, teknologier som fungerer på kvantenivå).””Usko-tekijä on kaikkialla, mukaan lukien tieteessä itsessään, ateismissa, antiteismissa, “skeptisissä”, “vapaaajattelussa”, “kriittisessä ajattelussa”, rationaalisessa, logiikassa, todisteissa, evidentialismissa, tieteisissä, nihilismissa, uuspositivismissa jne.”

          “Tiede on todella uskonto, ideologia ja usko. Katsokaa vaikka Internetiä, joukkoviestimiä ja Akatemiaa.”

          “Antiteismin ja ateismin vastaisena on oltava antikapitalismi, anti-neoliberalismi, antioikeistoisuus, antikommunismi, antisosialismi ja anti-vasemmisto.”

          “Antifasismi on mahdollista vain antikapitalismin, antineoliberalismin, antioikeiston, antikommunismin, antisosialismin ja anti-vasemmiston kanssa.”

          “Näin poliitikot, liikemiehet, kapitalistit, uusliberaalit ja oikeistolaiset kohtelevat meitä… Pahemmin kuin apinat sirkushäkeissä.”

          “Filosofi, esseisti, polemisisti, yhteiskuntatieteilijä ja anunnakisti Guilherme Monteiro Junior.”

          “Minun pitäisi todella työskennellä filosofisten ja sosiologisten teorioideni parissa, ja sitä aion yrittää tehdä tästä lähtien.”

          “Olemme paljon enemmän kuin ykkösiä ja nollia ja kuin yksinkertaisia ​​”liharobotteja” tai “biologisia robotteja.” Ja on olemassa monia argumentteja ja jopa todisteita siitä, että olemme enemmän kuin sitä… Sekä argumentteja ja todisteita olemassaolosta. jumalat, henkiset olennot, postfyysiset elämänmuodot, ekstrafyysiset elämänmuodot, uskonto, henkisyys, esoterismi, meediikka, psyyke, astraaliprojektio, multiversumi, ekstrafyysinen, metafysiikka, elämä kuoleman jälkeen jne.”

          “Elämme neurodiversiteetin, subjektiivisuuden, suhteellisuuden, uskon, mielipiteen, ideologian, uskonnon ja herkkäuskoisuuden maailmassa.”

          “Tarvitsemme lisää marxilaista, kommunistia, postmodernistia, anunnakistia, antikapitalistia, anti-neoliberaalia, antioikeistolaista, anti-ateismia, anti-teistiä, ekstrafyysistä, ekstranaturalistia, ekstramaterialistia, panpsykistiä, kriittistä antitiedettä, kriittistä antitieteilijää, universaalia neurodivergenttiä, anti-tiedettä. -antikollektivistit, biokollektivistit, filosofit ja ajattelijat bioegalitaarit (bioequalistit), viisaat egalitaristit (järkevät tasa-arvoiset), anti-transhumanistit, antimaterialistit, anti-evidentialistit ja muut vastaavat.”

          “Yhä enemmän tunnen oloni yksinäiseksi ja yksinäiseksi, eksyneenä ajatuksiini ja grafomaniaani.”

          “Joskus ajattelen todella kvanttitranshumanismin (kvantumismin) ja nanoteknologian transhumanismin tukemista.”

          “Juuri se tosiasia, että olen varmempi kommunistina kuin anunnakistina, osoittaa, kuinka paljon tarvitsen anunnakistia, antiteistiä ja antiteistin vastaista propagandaa, kunnes olen varma, että olen anunnakisti, koska olen kommunisti.”

          “Minun on parannettava suhdettani jumaliini ja päästävä lähemmäs ja enemmän yhteyttä heihin.”

          “On okei olla “irrationaalinen”, irrationaalisuus ja rationaalisuus ovat suhteellisia ja subjektiivisia.”

          “”Skitoteerinen” on todella fanaattinen ateisti ja antiteistinen termi, kuten “mumbojumbo”.

          “Voit kirjoittaa paljon kirjoja ja artikkeleita minusta ja työstäni, se on vain joku, joka tekee sen, joku, joka tukee minua ja johon olen vaikuttanut.”

          “Kvanttitranshumanismi (kvantismi) ja nanoteknologinen transhumanismi voivat todellakin olla erittäin hyödyllisiä ja tärkeitä tulevaisuudessa, mutta niitä on tutkittava ja kehitettävä edelleen, ja ne on myös korvattava klassinen transhumanismi tai saatava sama tila kuin klassisella transhumanismilla on nykyään.”

          “Nanotekninen transhumanismi on kuin kvanttitranshumanismi (kvantismi), mutta nanoteknologialla teknokvantin sijaan (kvanttiteknologiat, kvanttitasolla toimivat teknologiat).”«Ο παράγοντας της πεποίθησης είναι παντού, συμπεριλαμβανομένου στην ίδια την επιστήμη, τον αθεϊσμό, τον αντιθεϊσμό, τον «σκεπτικισμό», την «ελεύθερη σκέψη», την «κριτική σκέψη», τον ορθολογισμό, τη λογική, τα στοιχεία, τον αποδεικτικό, τον επιστημονισμό, τον μηδενισμό, τον νεοθετικισμό κ.λπ.».

          “Η επιστήμη είναι πραγματικά μια θρησκεία, μια ιδεολογία και μια πίστη. Απλώς κοιτάξτε το Διαδίκτυο, τα μέσα μαζικής ενημέρωσης και την Ακαδημία.”

          «Ο αντι-αντιθεϊσμός και ο αντιαθεϊσμός πρέπει να συνοδεύονται από αντικαπιταλισμό, αντι-νεοφιλελευθερισμό, αντιδεξιό, αντικομμουνισμό, αντι-αντισοσιαλισμό και αντιαριστερισμό».

          «Ο αντιφασισμός είναι δυνατός μόνο με τον αντικαπιταλισμό, τον αντινεοφιλελευθερισμό, τον αντιδεξιό, τον αντικομμουνισμό, τον αντισοσιαλισμό και τον αντιαριστερισμό».

          «Έτσι μας αντιμετωπίζουν οι πολιτικοί, οι επιχειρηματίες, οι καπιταλιστές, οι νεοφιλελεύθεροι και οι δεξιοί… Χειρότερα από μαϊμούδες σε κλουβιά τσίρκου».

          «Φιλόσοφος, δοκιμιογράφος, πολεμιστής, κοινωνικός επιστήμονας κα